mit international journal of electrical and ... paper.pdf · mit international journal of...
Post on 21-Aug-2018
237 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Vol. 4, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 100-103 100
Effect of Bad measurements on IEEE-14 Bus System in Power System State Estimation
Ankhi GulatiAssistant Professor
Electrical Engg. DepartmentIFTM University, Moradabad
Anil KumarAssistant Professor
Electrical Engg. DepartmentIFTM University, Moradabad
Niyati GulatiAssistant Professor
Electrical Engg. DepartmentMIT, Moradabad
INTRODUCTION
algorithm for converting redundant meter readings and other available information’s into an estimate of the state vector, while measured data are taken to be time invariant and static model of
the objective is to provide a reliable and consistent data base for security monitoring, contingency analysis and system control. To meet the above objectives, SE is required to [1].
and angles.
A major factor in the success of producing a good estimate of the system state is the ability to handle errors that exist in the
BAD DATA PROCESSING CYCLE
The ability of power system state estimator to detect and identify noise in the measurement data enables it to provide a dependable data base for power system operation and control. If one or more of the telemetered measurements are contaminated with gross errors (bad data), the estimated system state and the correspond-ing data base will be biased. Bad data may occur as a single bad measurement or multiple bad measurements; therefore, the main
objective of the power system state estimation is to minimize the bias in the data base [2].
Bad data processing in conventionally performed in three steps:
i. A detection procedure to determine whether bad data present.
-ments in the measurement set and their location in the system.
on the state estimate.
Fig. 1: Conventional bad data processing cycle
ERROR ESTIMATION
answers, but in reality never know the absolutely true state of a physically operating system. Even when great care is taken to ensure accuracy, unavoidable random noise enters into the measurements process to distort more or less the physical results. However, repeated measurements of the same quantity under carefully controlled conditions reveal certain statistical properties from which the true value can be estimated [3].
usually present in the telemetered measurements acquired through the data acquisition system and which determines the system
Key Words:
ABSTRACT
ISSN 2230-7656 ©MIT Publications
MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Vol. 4, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 100-103 101
The measured values are plotted as a function of their relative frequency of occurrence, a histogram is obtained to which a
curve most commonly encountered is the bell–shaped function
or normal probability density function, has the formula
p(z) =
21 z
21p(z)
2€
…(1)
And the variable representing the values of the measured quantity along the horizontal axis is known as the Gaussian or normal random variable z. Areas under the curve give the probabilities associated with the corresponding intervals of the horizontal axis. In the probability that z takes on values between the points a and b in the shaded area given by
p(a < z < b) =
Fig. 2: The Gaussian Probability Function
PROBLEM FORMULATION AND SOLUTION
Measurement equations can be written as:
Zmeas = Ztrue + …(3)
where Zmeas = value of a measurement from measurement device
Ztrue
random measurement error
For state estimation the weighted least-squares (WLS) criterion is applied [4], where the objective is to minimize the sum of the squares of the weighted deviations of the estimated measure-
ments, Æ , from the actual measurements, z. So if a single pa-rameter x is estimated, using Nm measurements, the expression as per WLS criterion will be
…(4)
where
ith measurement ,
12 = variance for the ith measurement ,
J(x) = measurement residual (error),
Nm = number of independent measurements,
Zmeas = ith measured quantity
Thus, meters with smaller error variances have narrower curves and provide more accurate measurements. In formulating the objective function f of Eq. (4), preferential weighting is given to the more accurate measurements by choosing the weight wi as the reciprocal of the corresponding variance
12 . Errors of
smaller variance thus have greater weight. Henceforth,
W = R–1 =
21
211
21
21
1. . .
1. . .
W R1
. . .
1. . .
€
€
€
€
…(5)
And the gain matrix G then becomes
G = HT R–1 H …(6)
CIRCUIT MODEL OF THE SYSTEM
System has 5 generation buses and 11 loads. Simulated test data has 41 number of measurements i.e. (Nm), and there are 27 state variables i.e. (Ns = 2N-1), where N is the number of nodes. Redundancy or degree of freedom in the measurement is 14 i.e. (Nm-Ns) There are 13 i.e. (N – 1) angles and14 voltages V to be determined in the test case.
Fig. 3:
ISSN 2230-7656 ©MIT Publications
MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Vol. 4, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 100-103 102
Table 1 presents the actual voltages and angles and estimated voltages and angles also their relative % error in voltage is pre-
magnitude (p.u) by without error is shown. [5]
Table 1: Estmated states without noise and their % errors
Fig. 4: Plot Between Buses No. Vs Voltage Magnitude (p.u)
WITHOUT BAD DATA BUT WITH NOISE
In this case 5% noise measurement noise has been added in measurement number 2, 10, 18 and 30. And also 5% noise in each measurement has been added and thereby estimation of the states is carried out. Table 2 presents the actual voltages and angles and estimated voltages and angles also their relative % errors. Figure 5 gives plot between buses no. Vs voltage magnitude (p.u).
Table 2 Estimated states with noise
Fig. 5: Plot Between Buses No. Vs Voltage Magnitude (p.u)
CONCLUSION
Test results of IEEE-14 bus system have been presented. These test systems are categorized in two parts. First part discusses the results of without bad data containing without noise in the measurements. Results of estimated voltages in (p.u) and angles in (degrees) as well as the % error in voltages are given. In part 2 the state estimate without bad data containing but with 5% noise in the measurement vector are presented. After compar-ing between result between without and by adding noise in the measurements we see the whole state of the system will affected.
ISSN 2230-7656 ©MIT Publications
MIT International Journal of Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Vol. 4, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 100-103 103
REFERENCES
1. R.L. Lugtu, D.F. Hackett, K.C. Liu and D.D. Might, “Power System State Estimation: Detection of Topological Errors”, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-99, No. 6 Nov/Dec 1980.
2. E. Handschin, F.C. Schweppe, J. Kohlas and A. Fiechter, “Bad Data Analysis for Power system State Estimation”, IEEE Trans. On Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-94, No.2, pp. 329-337, March/April 1975.
3. John J. Grainger, W.D. Stevenson J.R., Power System Analysis, McGraw Hill International,USA, 1984.
4. A. Monticelli, “Electric Power System State Estimation,” in the Proceeding of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 262-282, February 2000.
5. M.A. Pai, Computer Technique in Power System Analysis, Second
Edition, Tata McGraw-Hill Edition, 2006.
6. Felix F.Wu, Wen-Hsiung, “Observability Analysis and Bad Data
Processing for State Estimation with Equality Constraints”, IEEE
Trans. on Power System, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 541-548, May 1988.
7. Felix F. Wu, Wen-Hsiung, E. Liu and Shau-Ming lun, “Observability
Analysis and Bad Data Processing for State Estimation with
Equality constraints”, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 3, No.2,
pp. 541-548, May 1988.
8. Roberto Mínguez and Antonio J. Conejo, Fellow, IEEE, State
Estimation Sensitivity Analysis, IEEE Transactions On Power
Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, August 2007.
ISSN 2230-7656 ©MIT Publications
top related