navigating an auspicious regulatory risk governance path to seal your pension fund’s success or...

Post on 23-Jun-2015

600 Views

Category:

Business

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

For more information contact: emailus@marcusevans.com Stephen Mallett, Chairman of Trustees, Cobham Pension Scheme & Alan Grant, Regional Director, Jardine Lloyd Thompson delivered his presentation titled "Navigating An Auspicious Regulatory Risk Governance Path To Seal Your Pension Fund’s Success or It’s Just Not Good Enough!" at the UK Pensions and Investments Summit 2011. Join the 2015 Summit along with leading regional pension investors and global asset managers in an intimate environment for a focused discussion of key new drivers shaping institutional investment strategies today. For more information contact: emailus@marcusevans.com

TRANSCRIPT

1

Navigating An Auspicious Regulatory Risk Governance Path To Seal Your Pension Fund’s Success UK Pensions and Investments Summit 2011

2

or

It’s Just Not Good Enough!

UK Pensions and Investments Summit 2011

3

What’s the point?

4

What’s the point?

•The old cliché….to pay the right benefits to the right people at the right time

•Good governance should help efficiently achieve this objective

5

Good Governance

Procedures and governance tools

Conflicts of Interest Knowledge andUnderstanding

Funding and Investment

Communications

Good Governance

6

Good Governance

Assistance in the form of:

Advice from professionals

Codes of Practice

Independent and internal audits

tPR guidance

Industry surveys

1. Meetings

7

8

1. Meetings -Why is it a problem? Meetings The good trustee boards schedule

meetings in advance and stick to them…..but some meet infrequently

9

1. Meetings - Proposal Meetings The good trustee boards schedule meetings in

advance and stick to them…..but some meet infrequently

Mandatory meeting requirements based on size of scheme e.g. minimum 4 meetings per annum for schemes with assets of £200m+

“Must do” or “You cannot be serious”?

10

11

2. Trustee Training

12

2.Trustee Training -Why is it a problem? Trustee training Some trustees are clearly not properly

equipped to fulfil their duties

13

2.Trustee Training - Proposal Trustee training Some trustees are clearly not properly

equipped to fulfil their duties Completion of the Regulator’s trustee

toolkit is mandatory to be able to act as a trustee

“Rolls Royce” or “Robin Reliant”?

14

15

3. Conflicts of interest

16

3. Conflict of interest - Why is it a problem? Conflicts of interest They are to be expected, and can

generally be managed, but sometimes actual or perceived conflict is not dealt with as robustly as it should

17

3.Conflict of Interest - Proposal Conflicts of interest They are to be expected, and can generally be

managed, but sometimes actual or perceived conflict is not dealt with as robustly as it should

The Chairman, CEO and CFO should all be prohibited from being an employer-appointed trustee of an occupational pension scheme

“The Ivy” or “McDonalds”?

18

19

4. Governance Tools

20

4. Governance Tools-Why is it a problem? Governance Tools Trustees are left to their own devices and

practices vary from well organised to extremely poor

21

4.Governance Tools - Proposal Governance Tools Trustees are left to their own devices and

practices vary from well organised to extremely poor

Mandatory risk register, business plan, review of advisers, register of interests and conflicts

“Barcelona” or “Hartlepool United”?

22

23

5. Employer Covenant Assessment

24

5.Employer Covenant - Why is it a problem? Employer Covenant Assessment Practices vary and many trustees are still

not sure how far they should go

25

5. Employer Covenant - Proposal Employer Covenant Assessment Practices vary and many trustees are still not

sure how far they should go Minimum tests of strength of covenant

assessment for DB schemes

“Sandbanks” or “Middlesbrough”?

26

27

6. Timely Funding Updates

28

6. Timely Funding Updates- Why is it a problem?

Reacting to Funding Requirements Current statutory deadlines are such that

by the time agreement is reached the next funding update is due or has already been prepared

29

6. Timely Funding Updates - Proposal

Reacting to Funding Requirements Current statutory deadlines are such that by the

time agreement is reached the next funding update is due or has already been prepared

Valuations and new schedules of contributions should be signed off and implemented within 9 months of the effective date of the valuation

“Inspired” or “Crackpot”?

30

31

7. Member Communication

32

7. Member communication-Why is it a problem? Member Communication There’s a great deal happening in the

pensions world but few schemes communicate those issues well and rely on the Summary Funding Statement or annual benefit statement

33

7. Member Communication - Proposal Member Communication There’s a great deal happening in the pensions

world but few schemes communicate those issues well and rely on the Summary Funding Statement or annual benefit statement

Mandatory communication with members within 3 months of the accounts being signed off (annual newsletter)

“William Shakespeare” or “Jeffrey Archer”?

34

35

8. DC Communication

36

8. DC Communication - Why is it a problem? DC Communication General appreciation and understanding

of the DC pension is poor

37

8. DC Communication - Proposal DC Communication General appreciation and understanding of the

DC pension is poor Strengthened mandatory communication

with DC members re their potential benefits

“Mozart” or “Sex Pistols”?

38

39

9. Independent Trustees

40

9. Independent Trustees- Why is it a problem? Independent Trustees Many trustee boards have too many

potential conflicts of interest but employers shy away from appointing an independent trustee

41

9. Independent Trustees- Proposal Independent Trustees Many trustee boards have too many potential

conflicts of interest but employers shy away from appointing an independent trustee

Reduced PPF levy for schemes with independent trustees

“Go for it” or “Non-starter”?

42

43

The Top Nine Mandatory meetings Mandatory toolkit Ban on Chair, CEO, CFO being ENTs Mandatory internal controls documentation Core covenant assessment measures Shorter valuation timescales Annual newsletters Clearer communications for DC members Incentives for appointing independent trustees

44

Disclaimer

The views expressed during this presentation are those of Stephen Mallett and/or Alan Grant and

do not necessarily reflect the views of their employer or colleagues

top related