nrpa interests in craft project - pages - gnssn home documents... · radiation safety requirements...
Post on 01-Aug-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
www.nrpa.no
NRPA Interests in CRAFT Project
Malgorzata K Sneve
Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority
Complimentary Safety Reports, Development and Application to Waste
Management Facilities
IAEA CRAFT technical Meeting
Vienna, 16 – 20 June 2013
www.nrpa.no
Norwegian Plan of Action for
Nuclear and Radiation Safety in NW Russia
Overall Objectives
Generate confidence that nuclear legacy management
is under-pinned by a robust and independent regulatory
process, by
Working with relevant authorities to support them in
their regulatory supervision over specific problems,
adopting
A holistic approach to environmental and human health
protection, avoiding short term measures which create
new legacies
Plan of Action updated in 2013
indicating a long-term sustained policy
of regulatory cooperation
www.nrpa.no
Large range of legacies in Russia and CA
SF and RW temporary store Andreeva
Nuclear submarine dismantling
Decommissioning of RTGs in lighthouses
Uranium mine and mill tailings
Lepse Decommissioning
www.nrpa.no
Poor abnormal condition of facilities
View of old SNF storage building and containers with SNF in 2003
www.nrpa.no
Bi-lateral regulatory cooperation
State Atomic Energy Corporation (Rosatom)
Directorate of State Supervision of Nuclear and
Radiation Safety of the Ministry of Defense
Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA)
Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear
Supervision Service of Russia (Rostechnadzor)
Focus on:
Clarification of roles and responsibilities of all
involved organisations
Integrated consideration of legacy issues to
support coherent risk supervision
Development of practical regulatory requirements
and guidance relevant to the abnormal situations
Agreement with the Russian Ministry
of Defence renewed this year
www.nrpa.no
What has been achieved?
Timely development of official regulatory guidance to
address the abnormal conditions for:
Personnel Radiation Safety
Emergency preparedness and response
Control and monitoring of environmental contamination
Protection of the public
Radioactive waste management
Designed to support a comprehensive basis for design and development of remediation operations within an effective regulatory framework for:
radiation protection and nuclear safety, and
transfer from military to civilian supervision of radioactive materials.
www.nrpa.no
Focus of Next Steps
Practical application of the enhanced guidance
Application of optimization
Ensuring compliance through enforcement and
inspection
Coordination among all authorities, working in parallel
Arrangement for emergency preparedness and
response, because just now the most hazardous SNF
and RW recovery operations are due to start, and
Radioactive waste management!
www.nrpa.no
View of Saida Bay Centre of Conditioning and Long-
term Storage facility in 2007
Reactor
compartment
storage pad in
foreground;
RW
conditioning
facility under
construction,
background
www.nrpa.no
Waste management outputs
Radiation safety requirements for the Saida Bay Centre
of Conditioning and Long-term Storage of RW
Regulatory Guidelines on re-categorizing nuclear
materials as radioactive waste (fuel fragments in RW)
Criteria for on-site management and disposal of
industrial hazardous waste radioactively contaminated
above exemption levels, i.e. Very Low Level Waste
(VLLW)
www.nrpa.no
Links to IAEA programs
International working Forum for regulatory supervision
of Legacy Sites (RSLS)
Modaria:
WG1 Remediation strategies and decision aiding
techniques
WG3 Application of models for assessing
radiological impacts arising from NORM and
radioactively contaminated legacy sites
CRAFT!
www.nrpa.no
NRPA role and work in CRAFT
Regulatory Review Working Group
Financial and technical support for the RADON-type
Facility Application Case
Participate in the Project Steering Group
Outputs should support:
Regulatory decision making in general; and
Selection of remediation options, e.g. if to remove
already emplaced waste for further processing,
repacking and re-emplacement, or to leave where it is.
Problematic because it includes not just demonstrating
compliance with limits, but also compliance with
optimisation requirements.
top related