nustorm implementation at fermilab

3/27/20131

NuStorm Implementation at Fermilab

Michael GeelhoedFermilab AD/EBD

Photo by Marty Murphy

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20132

• Location• Primary Beamline• Main Injector Specifics• Components • Cost• Safety Considerations

Focus on Fermilab specific aspects

Topics covered yesterday:

Target ModulePion CaptureSpecial Magnet Design

Decay RingFar DetectorNear Detector

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20133

Location of Facility

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20134

Location of Facility

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20135

Location of Facility

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20136

Main Injector Absorber Area

Location of Facility

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20137

-20 80 180 280 380 480 580 680 780 8800

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

XBEAM (1 sigma)YBEAM (1 sigma)XBEAM (95%)YBEAM (95%)Aper XAper Y

Stationing (ft)

Half

Wid

th (m

m)

NuStorm Primary Beamline

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20138

-10 90 190 290 390 490 590 690 790 890

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

ALPHAXALPHAY

Stationing (ft)

-10 90 190 290 390 490 590 690 790 8900

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

BETAXBETAY

Beta

(m)

NuStorm Primary Beamline

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20139

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Y 1 SigmaX 1 Sigma

X and Y (mm)

X’ a

nd Y

’ (m

r)

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Y 6 sigmaX 6 sigma

X and Y (mm)

X’ a

nd Y

’ (m

r)

Beam on Target

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 103/27/2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

XBEAM (95%)YBEAM (95%)Aper XAper Y

Half

Wid

th (m

m)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

XBEAM (95%)YBEAM (95%)Aper XAper Y

Stationing (ft)

Half

wid

th (m

m)

Q001 Q002 Q003 Bermpipe

MI Abort line Reconfiguration

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 113/27/2013

Move Q002 and Q003 upstream by 30’ and 23’, along with different currents, NS/Abort beam reduces in size through the bermpipe

Current (Amps) Present Future

Q001 2770.5 1883.2

Q002 2828.0 1423.9

Q003 2770.5 853.0

MI Abort line Reconfiguration

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 123/27/2013

Find a suitable proton beam(Energy, pulse length, structure, etc.)

Beam Parameters:

120 Gev/c protons*1.33 second cycle time**1.57 µs pulse length per “batch”7.0E12 protons per pulse100 kW Beam Power

Available “Now”

Shielded for 400 kW

* Primary Beamline can be converted to 60 Gev/c ** Post 2013 Shutdown

Possible MI Capabilities

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 133/27/2013

Cost Quantity Cost ($M)

Dipoles 11 1.10

Quads 5 1.30

Trims 18 0.26

BPMs 12 0.08

Multiwires 11 0.22

Toroids 3 0.06

Enclosure length 432 ft 4.32

Total 7.34

Total x 3.2 (Contingency + Escalation) 23.50

Estimates provided by Fermilab Technical Division Project CoordinatorEstimates given by Fermilab AD/Instrumentation Dept. for LBNE Estimates provided by Fermilab’s FESS EngineeringEstimate based on Project X Management data

Beamline Components

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 143/27/2013

Magnet Images

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 15

Magnet costs

3/27/2013

Escalated values

Magnet style Series Date Escalation Labor ea Materials ea Total ea Qty Extended Total Comment

B2 Dipole BDM 2008 1.0958 $ 102,523 $ 11,287 $ 113,810 9 $ 1,024,288 Est for LBNE Job 440: Burn, clean-

up, reconstruct

3Q-120 QQQ 2009 1.0711 $ 90,958 $ 170,313 $ 261,271 5 $ 1,306,356 Est for LBNE Job 465 Build new

EDB EDBC 2012 1 $ 5,200 $ 2,700 $ 7,900 2 $ 15,800

Recently rebuilt with PEEK and 4 lg power flags (assumes existing

magnet)

IDH IDH 2004 1.2112 $ 10,780 $ 4,481 $ 15,261 8 $ 122,089 (23) were built in 2004 Job 188

IDV IDV 2004 1.2112 $ 10,780 $ 5,490 $ 16,270 8 $ 130,160 (same as IDH but 22.5% larger

M&S)

$ 2,598,694

* Estimates provided by TJ Gardner TD Project Coordinator

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 163/27/2013

Safety Consideration

Critical Devices include: NSHV1- Single EDB magnet bends beam away from MI Absorber to NS notch NU1H1- 5 B2 magnet string in NU1

Consideration taken: 50’ away from MI beamline center offers protection for construction installation and access

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 17

Safety Beamline Map

3/27/2013

MARS15 simulation run for Critical Device Justification N.V. Mokhov, "The MARS Code System User's Guide", Fermilab-FN-628 (1995); N.V. Mokhov, O.E. Krivosheev, "MARS Code Status", Proc. Monte Carlo 2000 Conf., p. 943, Lisbon, October 23-26, 2000; Fermilab-Conf-00/181 (2000); N.V. Mokhov, "Status of MARS Code", Fermilab-Conf-03/053 (2003); N.V. Mokhov, K.K. Gudima, C.C. James et al, "Recent Enhancements to the MARS15 Code", Fermilab-Conf-04/053 (2004); http://www-ap.fnal.gov/MARS/. MARS was developed in part with Government funding provided under DOE Contract DE - AC02 -76CH03000.

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/201318

Thank You

Special thanks to:Steve Dixon

Tommy LackowskiRonald Jedziniak

TJ GardnerDallas Heikkinen

Robert Riley

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 19

Backup Slides

3/27/2013

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 20

Backup Slides

3/27/2013