oracle vs google second half
Post on 05-Jul-2018
231 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
1/76
77
4/20/09
“Android is rippingoff” Oracle’s IP “
and getting away
with it”(TX 9201)
11/16/07“This is a really important
and legal issue” (TX 382)
1/29/09
“…buying the full rights to
Java… solve all of these
lawsuits” (TX 406)
8/6/10
Alternatives “all suck”…“we need to negotiate
a license”(TX 10)
5/30/08
“These restrictions prevent Apache Harmony
from independently implementing Java SE…not to mention Android (though that’s
water under the bridge at this point)” (TX 405)
4/17/08
“the copyright on the API is real and
hard to ignore.” (TX 5046)
3/24/08
“don’t demonstrate to
any Sun employees or
lawyers”(TX 29)
11/7/07
“Scrub out a few more J’s” (TX 26)
3/28/07
“We are beyond out of time”(TX 5114)
8/16/06
"we are
building a
java basedsystem: that
decision is
final”(TX 303)
6/1/06
Own APIs were
“half -ass at best”(TX 215)
3/24/06
APIs “are copyrighted”(TX 18)
Google Acted in Bad Faith
10/11/05
“We’ll pay Sun for
the license”
“Do Java anyway…perhaps making
enemies along
the way.”(TX 7)
2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0
11/5/2007Schwartz Blog
0 8
0 0 9
2 0 1
2
10/08
AndroidLaunch Date
8/12/10
Oracle suesGoogle
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
2/76
78
The Two Faces of Jonathan Schwartz
PUBLIC11/5/07
SC
HWARTZ BLOG
TX 2536
“I just wanted to add
my voice
to the chorus
of others
from
Sun
in
offering
my heartfelt
congratulations to Google
on the
announcement of
theirnew
Java/Linux phone
platform,
Android
. Congratulations!”
PRIVATE
3/8/07
“The Google thing
is
really a
pain. They
are
immune
to
copyright
laws
, good
citizenship,they
don’t share
.”
TX 563
1
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
3/76
79
The Two Faces of Jonathan Schwartz
“I just wanted to add my voice
to the chorus of others from
Sun in offering
to Google
on the announcement of theirnew Java/Linux phone platform,
Android. Congratulations!”
PRIVATE
11/05/07
“They’re claiming
developers
are undeserved
–
which is
crap.”
TX 2353
1
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
4/76
80
The Two Faces of Jonathan Schwartz
PRIVATE
11/07/07
“I
have no [sic] clue what
they’re up
to
–
my sense is
they’re
playing fast
and
loose with licensing
terms,and
they’re going to start
pissing people off…”
TX 2368
“I just wanted to add my voice
to the chorus of others from
Sun in offering
to Google
on the announcement of theirnew Java/Linux phone platform,
Android. Congratulations!”
1
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
5/76
81
The Two Faces of Jonathan Schwartz
PRIVATE
3/26/08
“They also take Java for
Android, without
attribution
or
contribution. This is why
I
love scroogle”
TX 1056
“I just wanted to add my voice
to the chorus of others from
Sun in offering
to Google
on the announcement of theirnew Java/Linux phone platform,
Android. Congratulations!”
1
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
6/76
82
The Two Faces of Jonathan Schwartz
PRIVATE
4/20/09
“[T]he battles with…
Google Android.”
TX 2362
“I just wanted to add my voice
to the chorus of others from
Sun in offering
to Google
on the announcement of theirnew Java/Linux phone platform,
Android. Congratulations!”
1
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
7/76
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
8/7684
Google Knew Copying Java API Packages Was Wrong
ERIC SCHMIDTExecutive Chairman
A. Yes.
Q. Now, t her e came a t i me when
Googl e was suf f i ci ent l y wor r i edabout bei ng sued t hat i t t houghtabout buyi ng al l t he r i ght s t o
J ava; cor r ect , si r ?
Tr. at 465:2-15
1
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
9/7685
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
1FACTOR
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
10/7686
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
1FACTOR
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
11/76
Fair Use Factors
2 The nature of the copyrighted work;
Jury Instruction 29 at p. 15
JUDGE ALSUP’S INSTRUCTION
“It is undisputed that the declaring code and the
structure, sequence, and organization of the 37 API
packages at issue were sufficiently creative and originalto qualify for copyright protection.”
87
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
12/7688
MARK REINHOLDChief Architect of
Java Platform Group
API Design Is “Intensely Creative”
Tr. at 1459:19-25
Q. And you testified you’ve been
wor ki ng f or 20 year s i n t hi s f i el d
desi gni ng API s. Do you consi der t hepr ocess of desi gni ng API s t o becreat i ve?
A. Oh, it’s intensively creative.
That’s why I like the Harry Potter
anal ogy so much. I t r eal l y i s a l otl i ke wr i t i ng a book. You have t okeep a l ot of st uf f i n your head,and t he end r esul t i s - - i s ver y,ver y r i ch and compl ex.
2
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
13/7689
The Java API Package Design Is Like a Book Series
The Journey from PlatformNine and Three-quarters
_____________________________________
Harry’s last month with the Dursleys wasn’t fun.True, Dudley was now so scared of Harry hewouldn't stay in the same room, while AuntPetunia and Uncle Vernon didn't shut Harry inhis cupboard, force him to do anything, or shoutat him -- in fact, they didn't speak to him at all.Half terrified, half furious, they acted as thoughany chair with Harry in it were empty. Althoughthis was an improvement in many ways, it did
become a bit depressing after a while.
2
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
14/7690
Fair Use Factors
2 The nature of the copyrighted work;
Jury Instruction 30 at p. 16
“When there are many possible ways to structure,
sequence, and organize a program, the particular
way chosen for a copyrighted program and
individual lines of declaring code may be (or maynot be) highly creative.”
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
15/7691
MARK REINHOLDChief Architect of
Java Platform Group
Declaring Code is “Extremely Expressive”
Tr. at 1454:24-1455:3
2
Q. I n what way i s decl ar i ng code
expr essi ve, i f at al l ,Dr . Rei nhol d?
A. Decl ar i ng code i s ext r emel yexpr essi ve. Ther e ar e an i nf i ni t enumber of cr eat i ve choi cesnecessar y t o desi gn i t wel l .
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
16/76
How many packages should there be?
Reinhold: Infinite Number of Creative Choices
Which classes do we want?How should our classes and
interfaces relate to each other?
Is one class a subclass of
this one or is it a subclass of
that one over there?Does a class implement
some interface in this API?
How do the
methods relate?
For every method, what kindsof inputs does it take?
What kind of outputs
does it produce?What kind of errors
can it report?
Tr. at 1460:1-22 (Reinhold) 92
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
17/7693
The Design of Java API Packages Is Creative
TX 877 93
2
JOSHUA BLOCHFormer Chief Java Architect
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
18/7694
The Design of Java API Packages Is Creative
TX 624 at 47
2
JOSHUA BLOCHFormer Chief Java Architect
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
19/76
The Design of Java API Packages Is Creative
Jury Instruction 28 at p 15
JUDGE ALSUP’S INSTRUCTION:
“Creative writing and expression lie at the very heart of
copyright protection”
2
Tr. at 1004:21-24
Q. And are some APIs harder to write than others?
A. Because of the complexity of figuring out how best to
express what it is that the programmer wants done.
Some tasks are more complicated than others.
95
JOSHUA BLOCHFormer Chief Java Architect
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
20/7696
DOUG SCHMIDTOracle Expert
Tr. at 1546:19-21
The Java API Packages Are Creative
2
The onl y t hi ng t hat made i t l ookt he way i t di d was t he degr ee ofcr eat i vi t y and exper i ence of t hedevel oper s who wr ot e t hose cl asses.
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
21/7697
Designing Java API Packages is a Creative Activity
Depo. at 14:3-6Bob Lee, Android Core Library Lead
2
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
22/7698
MARK REINHOLDChief Architect of
Java Platform Group
Placeholder – Reinhold Labels Callout
2
Tr. at 1461:24 – 1462:5
Q.Do you think it’s accurate to describe the
J ava API s as l abel s?
A.As labels? I think that’s laughably
si mpl i st i c.
Q.Why do you say t hat?
A.Wel l , a l abel i s j ust a name. I f al l wehad were names, then we wouldn’t need any
of t he – of t he st r uct ur e and or gani zat i ont hat you act ual l y f i nd i n t he APIpackages.
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
23/76
99
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
2FACTOR
1FACTOR
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
24/76
100
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
2FACTOR
1
FACTOR
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
25/76
Factor 3: The Java API Packages Are Important
3 The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relationto the copyrighted work as a whole; and
“The third statutory factor is the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relationship to the copyrighted work as a whole, which
concerns how much of the overall copyrighted work was used by the
accused infringer.”
“Even a small part may be qualitatively the most important part of
a work.”
Jury Instruction 33 at p. 17 101
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
26/76
102
The Total Amount of Android Code Is Not Relevant
GOOGLE’S ARGUMENT
“1/10 OF 1% OF ANDROID CODE”
3
JUDGE ALSUP’S INSTRUCTION
“For this factor, the total number of lines in Android is irrelevant.”
Jury Instruction 33 at p. 17
102
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
27/76
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
28/76
104
Schmidt: Copied Java APIs Were Substantial
Tr. at 1548:1-5
The f i nal poi nt I woul d l i ket o make i s t hat t he por t i onsof t he J ava API s t hatwer e copi ed ar e subst ant i al .
DOUG SCHMIDTOracle Expert
3
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
29/76
105
Reinhold: Google’s Copying Was Substantial
Tr. at 1456:23 - 1457:2
MARK REINHOLDChief Architect of
Java Platform Group
You coul d t hi nk of t hat – i n t he Harry
Potter anal ogy, i t woul d be t he t i t l esof t he books, t he headi ngs on eachchapt er , t he t opi c sent ences of ever ypar agr aph, but not j ust t hat .
It’s also all of the connections drawnbet ween t hose el ement s over t i me.
3
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
30/76
106
If it wasn’t important,
why did Google copy it?
If it wasn’t important,
why didn’t Google write their
own declaring code?
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
31/76
107
Importance: Using Java APIs Save“a pretty crazy amount of time”
TX 13 at 1
3
G l ’ A i P H I
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
32/76
108
Google’s Actions Prove How Importantthe Java API Packages Were
3
G l ’ A i P h J API P k
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
33/76
109
Google’s Actions Prove the Java API PackagesWere Important to the Market
What Google Privately Tells Prospective Partners
TX 387 at 7, 9, 34, 40, 50, 60, 61, 69, 74; TX 158 at 10; TX 5586 at 2, 7
3
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
34/76
OWEN ASTRACHANGoogle Expert
Tr. at 1267:25 – 1268:4
Q. The J ava pr ogr ammi ng l anguage i s di f f erentf r om t he API s; i s t hat cor r ect ?
A. Yes, I t hi nk t he pr ogr ammi ng l anguage andthe APIs are used together, but they’re
different. Yes. That’s reasonable, yes.
MARK REINHOLDChief Architect of
Java Platform Group
Tr. at 1462:25 - 1463:2
Q.Ar e t he J ava API s par t of t he J avapr ogrammi ng l anguage?
A.No, they’re not. The APIs – t he API s and
t he l anguage ar e di st i nct par t s of t he J ava pl at f or m.
Language Does Not Equal APIs
3
110
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
35/76
111
Language Does Not Equal APIs
Urs HölzleSenior Vice President, Google
3
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
36/76
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
37/76
113
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
2FACTOR
3FACTOR
1FACTOR
A d id H d th P t ti l Li i g M k t
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
38/76
Android Harmed the Potential Licensing Marketof Both Java SE and ME
“The fourth and final factor is the effect of the accusedinfringer’s use on the potential market for or value of the
copyrighted work”
“The term ‘potential market for or value of’ refers to thevalue of the entire copyrighted work itself and licensing
opportunities for the copyrighted work and its derivatives”
4 The effect of the use upon the potential market for or valueof the copyrighted work.
Jury Instructions 34, 35 at p. 18 114
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
39/76
J ava ME i s t he J ava Mi cr o Edi t i on Pl at f or m. You can t hi nk of i t as J ava SE’s little sibling.
Tr. at 1449:6-7MARK REINHOLDChief Java Architect
OWEN ASTRACHANGoogle Expert
ALAN BRENNERSr VP, Sun Client Systems Grp
Tr. at 1668:21-22
We sel ected cl asses f r om SE. J ava ME was essent i al l y der i ved
f r om J ava SE
Tr. at 1273:6-8
Q. I s i t t r ue that most of J ava ME i s a subset of somet hi ng i n SE?
A. I t hi nk t hat i s r easonabl e.
115
Java ME Is a Derivative Work of Java SE
4
Tr. at 1438:2-7
So J ava ME i s a subset of J ava SE, a st andard subset t hat al l owspeopl e t o have wr i t e once, r un anywhere on smal l er devi ces.
EDWARD SCREVENChief Corp. Architect
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
40/76
By 2006 Phones Had Evolved and Java SE
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
41/76
Havi ng a smar t phone t hat you wal k ar ound wi t h
t he power of what used t o be a ser ver has ki nd ofchanged t he l andscape of how we l i ve wi t h our di gi t aldevi ces.
OWEN ASTRACHANGoogle Expert
Tr. at 1932:8-10
ALAN BRENNERSr VP, Sun ClientSystems Group
Tr. at 1670:9-13
Over t i me, J ava ME absor bed mor e and mor e of t he J avaSE f unct i onal i t y. And t hat became possi bl e becausedevi ces wer e r api dl y i ncr easi ng i n CPU capabi l i t y,comput at i onal capabi l i t y, memor y, and bat t er y, t hat
al l owed us t o t ake on more of t he scope of SE.
By 2006, Phones Had Evolved and Java SEWas Licensed for and Used in Smartphones
117
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
42/76
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
43/76
Sun Was Well Positioned to Maintain
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
44/76
120
Sun Was Well Positioned to MaintainIts Strong Market Share (Pre-Android)
TX 9133.1 at 4
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
45/76
121
SAFRA CATZChief Executive Officer
Android Has Harmed Oracle
Tr. at 1355:8-12
Q. I n t he cour se of your busi nessat Or acl e, have you l ear ned t o
what ext ent , i f any, Andr oi d hashad an ef f ect on Sun and Or acl e?
A. Wel l , Andr oi d' s had a ver y
negat i ve ef f ect on Sun Or acl ei n a number of ways.
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
46/76
122
SAFRA CATZChief Executive Officer
Android Has Harmed Oracle
Tr. at 1355:14-18
First, it’s – it’s basically
f or ked t he J ava whol e pr i nci pl e,
t he whol e J ava communi t y has beenf or ked, meani ng spl i t i nt o t wobecause t he whol e i dea of J ava, asI ment i oned yest er day, i s wr i t eonce, run on any platform. That’s
r eal l y t he – t he bot t om l i ne.
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
47/76
123
Google “locks programmers into Android”
EDWARD
SCREVENChief Corporate
Architect
Q. What , i f anyt hi ng, i s yourunder st andi ng of t he consequence
of Android’s failure to be ani ndependent i mpl ement at i on asdef i ned by t he spec l i cense?
A. I t l ocks pr ogr ammer s i nt o Andr oi d.
It means that they can’t – t hei rapplications can’t run in other
envi r onment s, ot her t han Andr oi d.
Tr. at 1440:25-1441:2
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
48/76
124
Google’s Control of the Android Platform
TX 190
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
49/76
125
Android Has Harmed Oracle
Tr. at 1356:3-9
Secondl y, many of t hose cust omerst hat we used t o l i cense t o t ake a
copy, t o t ake a l i censed copy l i keSamsung or ZTE or Mot or ol a, j ustdi f f er ent l i censees, Bl ackBer r y, et c. ,t hey don' t need a l i cense - - t heydon' t t ake a l i cense f r om us anymor ebecause t hey use Andr oi d, whi ch i s
f r ee, and t hey end up usi ng Andr oi di nst ead of act ual l y payi ng us f or acopy of - - of our sof t war e.
4
SAFRA CATZChief Executive Officer
Android’s Effect on Samsung License:
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
50/76
126
Android s Effect on Samsung License:$40 Million Down to $1 Million
Tr. at 1359:5-9
Q. And how, i f at al l , di d t hat af f ectt he pr of i t abi l i t y of t he J ava
busi ness?
A. I t had a ver y negat i ve i mpact .Compani es l i ke Samsung t hat woul dl i cense a $40 mi l l i on cont r act wer e
down t o – woul d be l i censi nga mi l l i on dol l ar s.
4
SAFRA CATZChief Executive Officer
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
51/76
127
Android Was “Devastating”
Tr. at 1639: 23-25
4
Q. Al l r i ght . Can you t el l us,si r , i n one wor d t he i mpact of
Andr oi d on J ava?
A. I t was devast at i ng.
NEAL CIVJANFormer VP Worldwide
OEM Software Sales
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
52/76
128
NEAL CIVJANFormer VP Worldwide
OEM Software Sales
Android Had a “Massive Impact Very Quickly”
4
Tr. at 1632: 6-15
Q. And can you descr i be t o our j ur yt he i mpact t hat Andr oi d had on yourl i censi ng busi ness.
A. Wel l , Andr oi d was ver y – came on ver yqui ckl y, ver y st r ong. I t was f r ee.We wer e l i censi ng f or r oyal t i es, andi t was bei ng adopt ed i n t erms of new
desi gn wi ns f or phones acr oss t heboar d and di spl aci ng J ava on t hosephones and havi ng a massi ve i mpactver y qui ckl y.
C Aff d b A d id
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
53/76
129
Customers Affected by Android
Tr. at 1635:5-15
MASSIVE LOST REVENUEPROJECTED OVER A THREE-YEAR PERIOD
50 to 60%OF MOBILE PHONES USING
ANDROID INSTEAD OF JAVA
4
NEAL CIVJANFormer VP Worldwide
OEM Software Sales
A d id “Hij k d” J
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
54/76
130
Android “Hijacked” Java
Q. J ust t el l us t he i mpact of Andr oi don t he moral e of your t eam.
A. I t was devast at i ng t o me per sonal l yand my t eam because we put our hear tand soul i nt o maki ng t hi s assuccessf ul – I mean, you guys haveprobably all heard of Java and it’s
a huge success st or y i n t he
i ndust r y, and i t was hi j acked. Youknow, t hey t ook our t echnol ogy andt hey gave i t away f or f r ee and t heyt ook our cust omer s, and i t wasdevast at i ng.
4
Tr. at 1641:5-17
NEAL CIVJANFormer VP Worldwide
OEM Software Sales
A d id C d P i E i f O l
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
55/76
131
Android Caused Price Erosion for Oracle
Tr. at 1359:19-24; 1360:9-15
Q. What was t he si t uat i on wi t h respect t o Amazonl i censi ng?
A. So f or Amazon f or t he Ki ndl e – it’s a reader.For t he Ki ndl e Reader had used J ava t o creat e
t he Ki ndl e Reader f or many years. And t hen theyhad anot her pr oduct cal l ed t he Ki ndl e Fi r e andthat one they used Android so they didn’t
l i cense J ava at t hat t i me.
Q. And what happened?
A. Wel l , i n or der t o compete wi t h t hem, we endedup gi vi ng t hem l i ke a 97 and a hal f per centdi scount f or t he Paper whi t e. So i nst ead of whatwe woul d have hi st or i cal l y char ged t hem,because our compet i t i on was f r ee, t hey – t hey –we had t o of f er t hem a 97 pl us basi cal l y coupl ecent s on t he col l ar pr i ce f r om l i st pr i ce.
4
SAFRA CATZChief Executive Officer
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
56/76
Java-Based Android vs.
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
57/76
133
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2007 2008 2009 2012 2013 2014 2015
100%
6/2008
First
milestone
8/2010
Google: “Alternatives All Suck”
2010 2011
1/2010
Oracle
acquires Sun
Java Based Android vs.Licensed Java Smartphone Market Share
4
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
58/76
A d id Cl d th D t th S t h M k t
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
59/76
135
Android Closed the Door to the Smartphone Market
4
Depo Tr. at 135:23 - 136:4
We never made an ef f or t t o ent er
t he smar t phone mar ket . We anal yzed
whet her we had a r easonabl el i kel i hood of success i f we ent er ed
t he smar t phone market and deci ded,
you know, t hat Andr oi d had al r eady -
t her e al r eady was a J ava smar t phone
wi t h a l ot of moment um, and,
t her ef or e, we coul d not ent er t he
smar t phone mar ket .
LARRY ELLISONChairman of the Board
Android Closed the Door to the Smartphone Market
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
60/76
136
Android Closed the Door to the Smartphone Market
4
Depo. at 163:3-7 (1/14/2016)
HENRIK STAHLVP Product Management
Those deci si ons wer e based on
t he si mpl e obser vat i on t hatwe didn’t think there was any
mar ket l ef t af t er Andr oi dappeared and got domi nance, and
no i nvest ment s have been madesince, as far as I’m aware.
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
61/76
137
OPEN SOURCE OPEN SEASON
Andy Rubin
Q. But you looked at it, you understood it,
and you decided the OpenJDK license
was unacceptable to you; true?
A. I believe so, yes.
Tr. at 844:19-21
OpenJDK License Not a Viable Alternative Back Then
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
62/76
TX 9211, Tr. 1010:13
Using OpenJDK in Android was a “verboten topic”
JOSHUA BLOCHGoogle Chief Java Architect
OpenJDK License Not a Viable Alternative Back Then
138
4
BRIAN SWETLANDGoogle Sr. Staff Engineer
Usi ng t he API l i br ar i es woul d be “i ncompat i bl ewi t h our pol i cy of not usi ng GPL f or cor elibraries.”
Depo. at 139:1-2
DAN BORNSTEINGoogle Chief
Software Engineer
The l i censi ng t hat Sun i s usi ng f or bot hSE and ME are incompatible with Android’s needs.
TX 5048
Civjan: OpenJDK Didn’t Harm Business
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
63/76
139
Civjan: OpenJDK Didn t Harm Business
Tr. at 1649:2-6
4
NEAL CIVJANFormer VP Worldwide
OEM Software Sales
A. It didn’t really impact the business.
Q. Now, as – as Sun and then Oracle’s
Vi ce Pr esi dent of wor l dwi de sal es,you knew t hat openi ng sour ci ng J avat hr ough OpenJ DK coul d r educe t hecompany’s competitive advantage from
licensing the software, didn’t you?
Google Executives Admit Harm From
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
64/76
140
Q. And t he same woul d appl y t o Or acl e. Youwoul d agr ee wi t h me t hat any i ncr ease i n t he
unauthorized use of Oracle’s intellectual
pr oper t y coul d make i t more expensi ve t o dobusiness and harm Oracle’s results. Would you
agr ee wi t h t hat st at ement ?
Tr. at 1828:21–1829:1
A.I mean, yes, i t coul d make i t mor e expensi ve.
LARRY PAGECEO
140
ERIC SCHMIDTExecutive Chairman A. Yes.
Tr. at 392:18-21
Q. Any i ncr ease i n t he unaut hor i zed use of youri nt el l ect ual pr oper t y coul d make i t mor eexpensi ve t o do busi ness and har m your oper at i ngr esul t s; cor r ect ?
gUnauthorized Copying
4
A “Free” License Still Has Restrictions
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
65/76
141
A Free License Still Has Restrictions
4
Tr. at 420:12-15
ERIC SCHMIDTExecutive Chairman
A. Ther e i s a l i cense t hat al l ows yout o use i t wi t hout havi ng t o pay f or
i t .
Q. So when you don’t pay for it, canwe agree that’s for free?
A. Subj ect t o t he t er ms of t hel i cense, yes.
Google Protects Its Own Intellectual Property
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
66/76
142
Google Protects Its Own Intellectual Property
v
TX 5250
v
4
v
A “Free” License Still Has Restrictions
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
67/76
143
A Free License Still Has Restrictions
4
Q. And i t says her e t hat t he Adwor ds APIand AdWor ds speci f i cat i ons – do yousee t hose words?
Q. And i t says t hose ar e t he i nt el l ect ualpr oper t y and pr opr i et ar y i nf or mat i onof Googl e. Do you see t hat ?
A. I do.
A. I do.
A. We do.
Q. And you do expect peopl e wi t h t hesecont r act s t o honor t hem, do you not ?
ERIC SCHMIDTExecutive Chairman
Tr. at 410:10-18
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
68/76
Factor 4: Google’s Copying of the Java API Packages
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
69/76
Caused Actual and Potential Harm to Oracle
4 The effect of the use upon the potential market for or valueof the copyrighted work.
Jury Instruction 34 at p. 18 145
“This factor considers not only the extent of any market
harm caused by the accused infringer’s actions but also
whether unrestricted and widespread use of the copyrighted
materials of the sort engaged in by the accused infringer
would result in a substantially adverse impact on the potentialmarket for the copyrighted work.”
Other Oracle Markets at Risk
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
70/76
Other Oracle Markets at Risk
GPS SYSTEMS
MOBILE PHONES
TABLETS/E-READERS
AUTOMOTIVE
INTERNET OF THINGS
VOICE OVER INTERNET
PROTOCOL (VoIP)
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
(Televisions/Set-top boxes/
Blu-ray/Gaming)
PRINTERS
HOUSEHOLD
APPLIANCES
CAMERAS
PAYMENT TERMINALS
& POINT OF SALES
SYSTEMS
WEARABLES
WEB BROWSERS
MEDIA PLAYERS(Including set-top boxes)
GAME CONSOLESVENDING MACHINES
146
4
If Everyone Did What Google Did
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
71/76
147
“We Wouldn’t Have a Business”
Tr. at 1362:14-18; 1363:1-6
Q. Ms. Cat z, one of t he consi der at i ons t hatt he j udge has i nst r uct ed t he j ur y i sr el evant t o f ai r use i s what woul d happen
i f ever yone coul d do what Googl e i sdoi ng. What ar e your t hought s wi t hrespect to Oracle’s business, if that
were the case?
A. I f ever yone t ook a copy of our sof t war e
wi t hout act ual l y l i censi ng i t , wewouldn’t have a business any more.
We simply wouldn’t be able to afford to
invest…
4
SAFRA CATZChief Executive Officer
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
72/76
148
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
2FACTOR
3FACTOR
4FACTOR
1FACTOR
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
73/76
149
The Factors Overwhelmingly Favor Oracle
2FACTOR
3FACTOR
4FACTOR
1FACTOR
What This Case Is About
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
74/76
150
What This Case Is About
ecisions
onsequences
Verdict Form
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
75/76
151
Verdict Form
-
8/16/2019 Oracle vs Google Second Half
76/76
top related