patent agent examination paper a 2012 › ... › $file › brevetepreuvea2012-patentpapera… ·...
Post on 25-Jun-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
PATENT AGENT EXAMINATION
PAPER A
2012
Dear Candidate,
Paper A is a patent drafting exercise in which the candidate is requested to
prepare a full patent specification, with significant weight (60%) given to the
claims.
A hypothetical inventor has provided a description of the technology as the
inventor understands it. A search has been provided to assist the candidate in
evaluating the actual scope of the inventor’s invention. You will assume the
search is the most relevant of the prior art and you are cautioned not to impart
your own knowledge into your analysis and preparation of the patent application.
The inventor has provided the attached materials describing a peat harvesting
apparatus. A search has revealed three pertinent references, namely: US Patent
X,XXX,001, US Patent X,XXX,002, and a short article published in a well known
agricultural magazine.
On the basis of the client's letter, drawings, and the known prior art, prepare a
patent application. As is evident from the mark breakdown below, preparation of
formal portions of the application such as a petition is not required. The order of
the different sections is also not important for Exam purposes, yet the candidate
must provide titles for each section in order to assist correction.
Page 2 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Claims (60 marks)
The Candidate is required to submit a first independent claim (22 marks) of the
method type having 4 dependent method claims (8 marks, 2 marks each) and a
second independent claim (22 marks) of the apparatus type having 4 dependent
apparatus claims (8 marks, 2 marks each).
Description of the Embodiments (22 marks)
While clever, the inventor is unlikely to have provided language, structure and
organization appropriate for a patent application. Accordingly, full marks for the
description will not be awarded if the Candidate merely copies the inventor’s text
and, historically, lower marks have been awarded for exclusively cutting and
pasting portions from the examination itself. The description should not simply
consist of an enumeration of the elements on each figure. The description must
address with more details the point(s) of invention including the subject matter
recited in the dependent claims. Alternative embodiments should also be
discussed.
Drawings
The Candidate has been provided with duplicate unmarked copies of the
drawings for their use.
Page 3 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
MARK BREAKDOWN
Abstract 2.5 One (1) Independent Method Claim
22
Title 1 Four (4) Dependent Method Claims (2 marks each)
8
Field of the Invention 1 One (1) Independent Apparatus Claim
22
Background of the Invention 9 Four (4) Dependent Method Claims (2 marks each)
8
Summary of the Invention
2.5
Description of the Drawings
2
Description of the Embodiments (marks are allotted for proper reference to the drawings)
22
Subtotal 40 Subtotal 60
TOTAL 100
Page 4 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
To: Patent Agent
From: Abe Bogg
I’ve been harvesting peat for 30 years and I’m always looking for ways to
improve my harvests. The bogs I harvest are quite large, so I prefer to use heavy
duty suction-based harvesters, you know, the ones that have multiple suction
heads spread wide on either side and in front of my harvesting machine
(basically a tractor pulling a collection tank on wheels with a tow bar, with the
suction head assemblies spread in front of the tractor and on either side of the
tank on respective wheeled support frames that get towed along with the tank –
see Drawing A). Each suction head feeds into the tank, to which it is
interconnected by a duct works. A fan mounted on the chassis of the collection
tank is powered by a driving shaft connected to the power take off of the tractor’s
motor (not shown). The inlet of the fan is connected to an outlet of the collection
tank by an exhaust duct, and the outlet of the fan simply blows air outside. That
way, the suction produced by the fan draws peat from the ground through the
multiple suction heads as the machine advances through the bog.
Until recently, I had to adjust the speed of my tractor and the suction of the heads
(i.e. fan speed) based on the conditions of the peat, the type of peat I was
harvesting, the weather, etc., like farmers have been doing for years, to make
sure we don’t over or under harvest. That works fine for smaller machines, but
with wider harvesters, particularly when the contour of the bog is uneven, you
can’t really have optimal conditions across all the suction heads. Even with
smaller machines, I’ve tried adjusting the optimum peat collecting height
manually while driving the tractor, but either the inlet ends up getting blocked or I
break the suction head by striking it on the ground. You just can’t get a good
enough sense of the contour when you are sitting up in the tractor.
Page 5 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
So I came up with a solution and tried it out last month on my farm, and everyone
there thought it was a great idea. I came up with a pretty simple sensing
assembly that I can drag along the surface of the bog from the bottom of each
suction head for sensing changes in the contour of the peat to be harvested. For
each suction head, I welded a bunch of longitudinally spaced-apart curved rigid
sensing bars or fingers to extend down from a shaft that runs along the front and
bottom of the suction head (see Drawing C). I also welded a metal plate to a
collar that I secured to the shaft such that it points pretty much upwards between
a pair of metal sensors that are mounted inside the suction head (I picked them
up at the hardware store – when a piece of metal passes by, the electromagnetic
field changes around the sensor and the sensor outputs an electric signal). You
can see them in my drawing B marked as “up sensor” and “down sensor”. Note
that when I had tried it out on my farm, I had used optical sensors like the ones
you use for safety on garage doors, but these got dirty and tended not to perform
as well as the electromagnetic ones.
As the back of the rigid fingers drag on the surface of the peat to be harvested,
when they come across a dip, the fingers roll out and rotate the shaft, which
moves the metal plate toward the down sensor that outputs a signal indicating
that the suction head is approaching a dip and that it should be brought down.
When the fingers roll up a bump, they curl up, the shaft is rotated in the opposite
direction and the metal plate activates the up sensor indicating that the suction
head should be brought up. Then all I had to do was use the sensors to control a
vertical actuator that can adjust the vertical height of my suction heads, and thus
the inlet, up and down based on which sensor is sending a signal, and which
maintains the inlet at the optimum height. You can see an example of the
hydraulic piston actuators I used in drawing D.
Page 6 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
You can see on my drawings D and E (E is from the side of D as shown) how
each suction head is mounted to a wheeled mobile frame through a vertical
actuator. In this particular design, I used a separate piston-actuated structure for
each suction head; that way, each suction head can move vertically relative to
the frame. You can see how the wheels that are mounted on the actuated
structure engage and cooperate with the vertical channel fixed on the frame to
move the suction head up and down upon actuation of the piston.
When the sensor fingers at the front of one of the suction heads senses a drop,
the corresponding signal is sent to this suction head’s actuator to drop the head,
and vice-versa when the sensor fingers sense a rise in the bog contour. That
way, each suction head is pretty much kept at the same optimal distance above
the bog regardless of the bog contour. I could never do that manually for each
head at once! Even for a single suction head, it beats having to do it manually.
I have included a supporting schematic like sketch to help explain operation of
my peat harvester. Sorry about the coffee stains, but its a rough sketch and I
don't think you want to use it in the application anyways, better just to explain
what it shows using the other drawings A-E.
It works pretty well. I can even sample the bog conditions (wet vs dry), take into
account the type of peat being harvested, the speed at which I can safely drive
my machine and the suction speed of the fan, and set the optimal height of my
suction heads accordingly at the onset – the automated height adjuster takes
care of the rest. Of course, Phragmites, Fibric, Hemic and Sapric peats are of
decreasing density, so I run my optimal height at 5, 8, 10 and 15 centimetres for
each of these species, respectively. I also adjust the height based on a moisture
content of the peat: down 25% in dry conditions to draw a thicker layer, and up
25% in wet conditions to draw a thinner layer.
Page 7 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
You can move the sensing fingers forward, up and down by adjusting the length
of the longitudinal and vertical adjustment bars that ultimately couple the
respective sensor shafts to each of the suction heads (see drawing D). That way,
you can set the optimal height of the suction heads before you start, and moving
the sensing bars forward can give you another means for optimizing how precise
your suction head adjustments are relative to your driving speed. Another way to
adjust the optimal height is to rotate the metal bar and collar on the shaft relative
to the sensing bars. There’s probably twelve different ways of doing this.
Page 8 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 9 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 10 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 11 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 12 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 13 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 14 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 15 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 16 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 17 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
US PATENT No. X,XXX,001 April 14, 1980
MEANS FOR PNEUMATIC GATHERING OF MILLED PEAT
Pete Hoover
The present invention concerns a means for pneumatic gathering of peat,
consisting of a carriage moving on the bog and comprising a blower or equivalent
member for producing suction, a conduit for sucking up peat from the surface of
the bog, a separator for separating the peat from the suction air, and a receptacle
wherein the peat gathers.
The quality of the peat being gathered can be influenced by adjusting the driving
speed or suction, as wet peat particles can be left on the surface of the bog when
suction is lowered or driving speed increased to gather only the desirable dried
layer of peat.
Hereby, it is possible to moll and gather thick layers during favourable drying
periods and when rainy weather is impending, to draw only a thin, dried layer
from the surface of the bog. Using this method, annual overall yields can be
increased by as much as 15 to 40%.
The invention is described with reference to the following Figures, in which:
Figure 1 is a side elevation view of a means for gathering milled peat, in
accordance with one embodiment of the invention; and
Figure 2 is a sectional view of the means of Figure 1, taken along line Il-Il thereof.
The means depicted in the drawings and intended for pneumatic gathering of
peat consists of a gatherer carriage 2 provided with wheels 1 and which may be
attached e.g. to a tractor (not shown). The carriage 2 generally comprises a
blower 3, suction tubes 5 provided with suction heads 4, and a receptacle 6. The
Page 18 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
section tubes 5 terminate in the upper part of the receptacle 6. The receptacle is
divided with the aid of a flap 8 hinged on its top end into a larger part 9 and a
smaller part 10. A cyclone 11 located above the smaller part 10 of the receptacle
and communicating with each part 9 and 10 of the receptacle is connected to the
blower 3 via tube 12.
The gatherer carriage 2 is used to collect the dried peat layer 13 from the surface
14 of the bog. The gathering takes place while the carriage 2 is moving and the
suction heads 4 are drawing peat 13 by action of the suction produced by the
blower 3. The two suction heads 4 are staggered and oriented such that
respective inlets thereof face rearwardly relative to the general advancing motion
of the carriage, though other configurations are possible including forwardly or
downwardly facing inlets, side-by-side suction heads, and different suction head
combinations located in different locations around the carriage 2.
In operation, the peat is drawn by the suction tubes 5 into the upper part of the
part 9 of the receptacle 6, wherefrom the course peat particles descend onto the
bottom of the receptacle under gravity effect. In contrast, the suction air and the
more finely divided peat particles move as indicated by the arrow 15 in Fig. 1, to
the cyclone 11 where separation of the finely divided particles takes place by the
centrifugal force effect. Hereby, the said particles gather, as shown by the arrows
16, in the part 10 of the receptacle, the suction air proceeding, as shown by the
arrows 17, into the tube 12 departing from the cyclone 11, and thence further
through the blower 3 into open air.
During peat gathering, the flap 8 is in the position in which it constitutes an
airtight partition between the parts 9 and 10 of the receptacle. When the carriage
2 is dumped for emptying from the receptacle the peat collected therein, the flap
carried by the hinges 7 turns under gravity effect into the position 8' indicated by
Page 19 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
interrupted lines in Fig. 1, whereby the peat is enabled to flow out from both parts
of the receptacle. When the carriage 2 after being emptied is lowered down to its
normal horizontal position, the flap returns to its initial position.
As noted above, the amount of suction generated through suction head 4 can be
adjusted upon adjusting blower speed, for example, as can the driving speed, to
accommodate different harvesting conditions (e.g. wet vs. dry), improving overall
annual yields.
Page 20 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 21 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
US PATENT No. X,XXX,002 July 31, 1975
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HARVESTING PRODUCE SUCH AS
TOMATOES
Red Orbgardener Jr.
The present invention relates to a method and machinery for harvesting of vegetables
or fruits growing on low plants such as tomatoes, and particularly to such plants grown
on plastic mulch covered beds.
Mechanical harvesters are available that cut vines free from their roots and transport
the cut plants and its fruit to processing equipment which removes the tomatoes from
the vines, separates the tomatoes from the foliage and dirt, and sorts the tomatoes as
to size and quality.
Typical prior art mechanical harvesters are characterized by cutters that operate at or
just below the surface of the soil. Problems encountered with cutters operating in this
way include: picking up of soil along with the tomato plants; damage to the tomatoes
from soil and rocks; and damage to the tomatoes in the separation of soil and rocks. In
addition, soil is quite abrasive, wearing out moving parts and causing costly
maintenance.
With the bush type planting style, tomatoes are grown without stakes and supporting
lines and the foliage grows in a matted fashion with the lower fruit weighting the matted
vines to lie on the surface of the soil bed. The lower hanging fruit is subject to damage
by the mechanical harvester, even with the cutters operating below the bed surface.
Recently, the technique of growing tomatoes and other plants on plastic mulch covered
Page 22 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
beds has been developed. This has proven to have many advantages including
cleanliness of the fruit and good control of weeds, increase in harvesting efficiency. It
is also common to include drip irrigation tubing along the bed underneath the plastic
mulch for watering and fertilizing of the bed.
Available mechanical harvesters have proven unsatisfactory for operation over plastic
mulch beds. The plastic film becomes torn and shredded, causing clogging of conveyor
belts, separators, and other moving parts of the machinery, and the irrigation tubing is
usually damaged.
The invention is a novel harvester head end and method of harvesting for tomato
plants and like produce that is particularly suited for use over plastic mulch covered
beds. The harvester head or front end comprises a novel reciprocating sickle cutter
operated and maintained less than 3/4 of an inch (2 cm) above the surface of the
plastic, means for lifting the lower portions of the plants to permit the cutter to sever the
plant stems without damaging the lower hanging fruit, and a short conveyor for carrying
the plants rearwardly from the cutter. The apparatus is carried in a framework chassis
supported by a pair of gage wheels that ride in the furrows between the beds. Thus,
the head end of the invention cuts and picks up the plants without damage to the beds,
and delivers the cut plants to the prior art conveyor. The plants are then conventionally
processed in the field by the appropriate functions of the prior art machine.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will be noted by a reading of
the following detailed description, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a schematic side view of the invention showing the operation thereof;
FIG. 2 is a partial cutaway top view of the invention;
Page 23 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
FIG. 3 is a right-side view of the invention supported on a chassis; and
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the electro-hydraulic cutter height control system of
the preferred embodiment.
Referring to FIG. 1, a typical seed bed 1 for tomato plants and the like is shown in
cross section covered with a plastic mulch 3. Growing through perforations in the
plastic mulch 3 are tomato plants 4 with one such plant 4a shown just prior to cutting of
its stem. The elements of the invention shown are moving over the bed 1 in the
direction of the open face arrow. Four major elements of the apparatus are
schematically illustrated: cutter assembly 10 for cutting the stems of the tomato plants
4; lifter and conveyor 20 for lifting pendant lower portions of plants 4 and conveying cut
plants 6 rearwardly; reel 40 for urging cut plants onto conveyor 20; and height sensing
assembly 30 used as part of a system to maintain cutter assembly 10 a selected
distance above the surface of plastic mulch 3.
Tomato plants, such as plants 4, are planted in rows along the center line of bed 1 and
spaced about one foot apart. Cutter assembly 10 is thus arranged to move
longitudinally along the center line of bed 1 as best seen in the top view of FIG. 2.
Cutter assembly 10 includes a fixed upper blade having a set of V-shaped teeth 17,
and a matching lower reciprocating blade having a matching set of V-shaped teeth 19
such that a plant stem contacted by cutter 10 is quickly and cleanly severed by the
blades.
Lifter/conveyor 20 utilizes a pair of endless flat belts 22 having a set of rubber covered
fingers 24 projecting from their surfaces. As the apparatus moves forward, the fingers
24 on belts 22, which are rotating clockwise as viewed in FIG. 1, contact and lift the
branches, leaves, and fruit of the plant being approached. As the harvester continues
Page 24 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
to move forward, plant 4a is carried higher and rearward by belts 22 as indicated by
arrow A. Cutter assembly 10 then contacts the plant stem a short distance above
mulch 3 and cleanly cuts the stem. The cut plant, as illustrated by plants 6, is then
carried by belts 22 and belt 29 in an upward and rearward direction due to the inclined
disposition of conveyor assembly 20 as shown in FIG. 1. Plants 6 are then dumped to
the rear of the harvester to be redeposited on the bed surface as shown by arrow B.
The redeposited plants 8 are left in the field for a brief period to allow the plants to wilt,
making later separation of tomatoes from the plants much easier to accomplish.
It is important that cutter assembly 10 be an optimum distance above the surface of
bed 1 and plastic mulch 3. If too low, cutter blades 17, 19 can contact plastic mulch 3,
cutting and tearing the plastic film. If too high, the cutter assembly 10 can contact plant
limbs and fruit with consequent damage thereto. It has been found for tomato plants
that a height of about 3/4 inch is effective. Due to the irregularities of produce beds, an
automatic height adjustment system has been found highly desirable to maintain the
selected height, and greatly reduces or eliminates both produce and mulch damages.
Accordingly, a height sensing assembly 30 is utilized to control a height adjustment
apparatus to be described below. Cutter assembly 10 is supported by brackets 15
attached to transverse frame member 11 which also supports height sensor mounting
plate 31. A skid 32 is pivoted to plate 31 and arranged to slide along plastic mulch 3
and bed 1 as the harvester moves forward. An upward extending arm 38 is formed to
operate microswitches 36 and 37, as shown in FIG.4. When the cutter height is correct,
arm 38 is essentially centered and neither switch is closed. If the cutter height is too
low, upper switch 36 will be closed, and, if too high, lower switch 37 will be closed.
Operation of switches 36 and 37 causes frame member 11 to be raised or lowered by a
hydraulic actuator 84. Actuator 84 is attached to tube 85 with its actuating rod attached
to post 83 whereby operation of actuator 84 will raise or lower the frame 100 by
telescoping action of tube 85 and post 83. Spring 34 maintains a strong downward
bias on skid 32 sufficient to crush loose tomatoes or plant parts that could otherwise
Page 25 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
produce a false height indication. Thus, if furrow 7 rises, the cutter assembly 10 will be
caused to lift too high from the bed surface, and contact 37 will close as the skid 32
drops. Contact 37 operates solenoid 92 with the battery of the towing tractor furnishing
the necessary electrical power. Solenoid in turn actuates valve 90 to apply hydraulic
pressure to actuator 84 to cause tub 85 to lower with respect to wheel 82 until skid 32
opens contact 37 returning the valve 90 to neutral. The reverse is done if the furrow
drops.
The operative parts of the invention may be supported on a frame or chassis 100. As
seen in FIG. 3, the chassis can be pulled by a tractor utilizing yoke assembly 80
attached to the front of member 74. Square steel tubes 85, also attached to the front of
member 74, support gage wheel posts 83 which slide within tubes 85. Posts 83 are
attached to a pair of gage wheels 82 that ride in the furrows between beds while the
harvester is in operation. The height of the chassis 100 above a plant bed is adjusted
by sliding of posts 83 in tubes 85 utilizing hydraulic power to be described herein
below. Rearward extending side members 73 support rear vertical members 72 and
rear cross member 11. Two cantilevered arms 77 also project rearward from front cross
member 74.
FIG.3 shows rearward-extending member 73 cut away to reveal cantilevered arm 77
with conveyor assembly 20 supported therefrom by vertical support post 76. Post 76 is
formed by two telescoping structural forms to permit a vertical adjustment on initial
assembly. Conveyor 20 is attached to posts 76 by end pieces 75 and angle plates 51
which pivot about the lower ends of posts 76, permitting the adjustment of the angle of
conveyor belts 22 and 29 with respect to the beds. A hydraulic motor 39 serves to drive
rear roller 27 which powers belts 22 and 29. Yoke 80 is attached to front cross member
74 for coupling to a tractor with three point hitch 90. Also shown in FIG. 3 is hydraulic
actuator 84 connected to wheel tube 85 and wheel post 83. Hydraulic fluid and
pressure is supplied to the harvester from the towing tractor hydraulic system for the
Page 26 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
operation of actuators 84 and the hydraulic motors such as motor 39. The harvester
assembly is moved by the tractor in the direction of the open faced arrow with height
sensing skid 32 moving along the raised bed 1 over plastic mulch 3 with gage wheels
82 riding on the surfaces of furrows 7 shown in cross section.
Page 27 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 28 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Page 29 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
Reference 3
Peat Carvers and Cutters Weekly
August 6, 1968 edition
A new peat moss harvester to solve all your peat strata problems!
From our field correspondent, Harvey Ester
A revolutionary new machine is now available, which dramatically improves peat
harvesters’ ability to loosen and separate peat from a strata of relatively dense
peat and then collects the loosened peat, all in one simple operation.
In the diagram below, the machine has a blower 17 mounted on a wheeled frame
13. The blower 17 supplies air to a duct 19 that is connected to a wide mouthed
jet 21 An air stream, shown by arrows 27, is directed onto the dry, milled peat 29
that is partially enclosed in a collection head 31 as the machine rolls over the
peat. Air from the jet 21 loosens the upper strata of dried, milled peat 29 from
the lower strata of wet or damp peat 33. The air from the jet 21 not only loosens
and separates the dry peat from the wet peat, but also the stream deflecting off
the wet peat directs the loosened dry peat up and over a deflector 37 having an
edge that is contiguous with the surface of the uncollected dry peat. The air
velocity at the jet is controlled by a bleed off duct 23 and a damper 25. The
loosened dry peat is entrained into a second air stream (shown by arrows 41) at
the throat 43 of the collector head 31.The throat 43 communicates with a vacuum
collection passage 45 that leads to a collection bin 47. When the air and peat 35
enters the bin 47, the velocity of the second air stream drops and the dry peat
falls into the bin 47. If needed, separate blowers can be used for controlling or
adjusting the velocity of the air streams. A damper 53 in a duct 49 controls and
adjusts the velocity of the second air stream. An access door 55 is available to
aid removal of the collected peat 35.
Page 30 of 30
PAPER A - 2012
The new machine now solves the problem of wet peat being picked up with the
dry peat; a problem which has plagued conventional vacuum pick up models in
the past. Also, where vacuum pick up models only seem to work well on smooth
terrain, the new machine works well on almost any type of terrain, rough or
smooth.
The new machine guarantees a lifetime of unhindered peat harvesting, even in
the most dense peat strata.
top related