phenotyping texture and aroma wp5 training session stress test development jan verschoor
Post on 26-Jan-2017
497 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
WP5 Development of a strategy for the selection of varieties with good storage behaviour DLO Renata Ariens, Jurriaan Mes, Jan Verschoor
Objective
• New varieties should have a good storage potential
• Practice: almost year round storage at Controlled Atmosphere conditions (ULO, DCA)
• Problems: chilling injury, CO2 damage, decay, loss of firmness, short shelf-life when taken from storage
• Develop a test which can select good varieties early during breeding and selection: Storage Stress Test
Stage 1. Selection of storage conditions
Five commercially grown cultivars • Cox O.P. • Elstar • Golden Delicious • Jonagold • Kanzi Harvested (2012) • a week before • at commercial harvest date (for long term ULO-storage) • 1 week after Storage period • 1 week conditioning + 1 week shelf life • 1 month conditioning + 1 wk. shelf life • 2 months conditioning + 1 wk. shelf life
regime T (°C) %O2 %CO2
1 -1 21 0
2 -1 1 5
3 10 21 0
4 10 1 5
Number of apples per time point scored 20
Parameters analysed
• At harvest before storage
– Starch
– Firmness (penetrometer, aweta)
– Colour
– DA meter
– Titratable Acids
– Brix
• After storage and shelf-life
– Firmness
– Colour
– Chilling injury (index)
– CO2 damage (index)
Cultivar behaviour in test
Cultivar
Max storage period
(optimal conditio
ns)
Low Temp Sensitivity flesh
browning Texture issues
Low O2/high CO2 tolerance
Disorder sensitivity
practice
test practice test practice test practice test
Cox 5-6 m +++
+++
(-1°C + CA, late harvest, ≥1 month)
Can develop mealiness
before softening
Mealiness , rapid
softening (air,
≥1 month)
- - Bitter pit,
brown core, Softening
Kanzi 12 m +++
++++
(-1°C + CA, late harvest, 2
months)
Very firm, tough peel
Very firm indeed
++
++
(-1°C + CA, last harvest, ≥1 month)
bitter pit, lenticel
breakdown
Jonagold 9 m - - Greasiness Greasiness (10°C, air, ≥1
month)
++
+ (-1°C + CA,
3 harvest, ≥1 month)
Scald, flesh browning
Golden 8 m - -
- Greasiness (10°C, air, ≥1
month) ++
++
(-1°C + CA, 1+3 harvest, ≥1 month)
Scald
Elstar 7 m + - Rapid
softening after storage
- + - Softening, skin spots
Skin spots (all treatm
Conclusion from Y1
• Chilling injury is reflected at -1˚C +CA, late harvest, >1 month storage
• CO2 sensitivity is reflected at -1˚C +CA, late harvest, >1 month storage
• Texture issues are best reflected at (10˚C) air, all harvest, >1 month storage
• Disorders, difficult to induce, symptoms very rare
• Minimum fruits needed ~ 40, for 1 stress test
Y 2
Objective: expand the correlation analysis between cultivar storage behaviour and stress test
– 13 cultivars (INRA)
– Harvest 2013
– Stored for 1 month at -1°C in CA (1%O2/5%CO2)
Analysis at start
- Firmness (FTA automated penetrometer, destructive)
- Ground colour (colour chart)
Analysis after storage and shelf-life
- Firmness (FTA automated penetrometer, destructive)
- Ground colour (colour chart)
- External and internal disorders
(expert visual evaluation)
Experimental setup
• 13 cultivars from INRA Angers
• harvest date determined by INRA (starch index 7)
• Randomized after harvest
planning for each cultivar day
harvest (INRA) 0 holding temperature day 0-7: 4°C
transport to FBR 1-6 courier transport between day 1-6 (<10h)
storage at FBR 7 storage duration 35 days
storage at 2 regimes:
4°C in air (= control)
-1°C in CA [1%O2/5%CO2] (= stress inducing
treatment)
shelf life 42 7 days at 18°C/80% RH
quality check & freezing
RNA-sample 49
Stress test material
cultivar harvest days between harvest and transport to
FBR
Cox 20-sep 12
Elstar 26-sep 6
Greensleave 26-sep 6
Canada rouge 26-sep 6
Gala face A 26-sep 6
Gala face B 26-sep 6
Golden 26-sep 6
Ariane 26-sep 6
Jonagold 26-sep 6
Belle de Boskoop 26-sep 6
Chanteclerc 18-okt 18
Fuji 23-okt 13
Granny Smith 31-okt 5
Was not possible to have it standardized among samples
Stress test results: Firmness
Average of firmness (kg) storage regime
cultivar -1°C in CA (1%O2/5%CO2) 4°C in air Grand Total
Chantecler 4.63 3.10 3.87
Greensleeve 4.20 3.57 3.88
Canada Rouge 6.47 4.36 5.41
Cox 6.32 4.58 5.42
Jonagold 6.75 4.57 5.63
Elstar 6.19 5.26 5.72
Golden 7.35 4.10 5.72
Gala Face B 7.07 5.61 6.34
Gala Face A 7.05 5.69 6.37
Belle de Boskoop 8.43 5.69 7.06
Fuji 7.55 7.29 7.42
Granny 7.86 7.83 7.84
Ariane 9.23 8.52 8.87
Grand Total 6.87 5.42 6.14
Stress test results: Colour
Average of colour-index storage regime
cultivar -1°C in CA (1%O2/5%CO2) 4°C in air Grand Total
Chantecler 4.9 5.0 4.9
Cox 4.6 4.8 4.7
Gala Face A 4.0 4.8 4.4
Jonagold 3.9 4.3 4.1
Canada Rouge 4.0 4.1 4.0
Gala Face B 3.9 4.1 4.0
Greensleeve 3.7 4.3 4.0
Elstar 3.6 3.9 3.8
Golden 3.1 4.1 3.6
Fuji 3.6 3.6 3.6
Ariane 3.0 3.8 3.4
Belle de Boskoop 3.0 3.1 3.1
Granny 2.0 2.4 2.2
Grand Total 3.6 4.0 3.8
Hardly disorders inducted
Only in -1°C in CA (1%O2/5%CO2)+ shelflife
cultivar Internal CO2-injury (% of fruits) Chilling injury (% of fruits)
Ariane
Belle de Boskoop
Canada Rouge 25% 70%
Chantecler
Cox
Elstar
Fuji 10%
Gala Face A
Gala Face B
Golden
Granny
Greensleeve
Jonagold
Conclusion Y2
• Difficult control harvest time
• Limited disorder symptoms
• Due to pre-storage (4˚C) conditions ?
• 1 months storage not enough ?
• Year to year variation ?
Can gene expression marker speed up storage behaviour diagnose
• Stress test better performed for up to 3 months
– More expensive
– Results later in time and next experiments can be planned
• Do changes in gene expression already predict those cultivars that have storage problems
Experiment 3
- Harvest 2014
- 4 cultivars x 5 different growers (NL)
- Late harvest
- stored at -1°C in CA (1%O2/5%CO2)
- Storage duration 3.5 months (+ 1 wk shelf life)
- Take apple sample after 1 wk for gene expression analysis
- Relate these genes with storage after 3.5 months
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
pe
ne
tro
me
terv
alu
e (
kg)
Firmness
at harvest after 4 months stess inducing treatment (-1°C/1%O2/5%CO2) + 1 week 18°C
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
External CO2 injury-index (0-100%)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
internal CO2-injury
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Average of Chilling injury
Behaviour in practice and test
Cultivar
Max storage period
(optimal conditions)
Low Temp Sensitivity flesh
browning Texture issues
Low O2/high CO2 tolerance
Disorder sensitivity
practice test practice test practice test practice test
Kanzi 12 m +++ ++
Very firm, tough peel
Very firm indeed
+ ++/+
bitter pit, lenticel
breakdown -
Belle de Boskoop
6 m +++ +++ Softening Softening but
acceptable + -/++
Scald, flesh browning
-
Golden 8 m - -
- Softening but acceptable
++ - Scald -
Elstar 7 m +/- +
Rapid softening
after storage
Softening but
acceptable -
+/- +/+ Softening, skin spots
Skin spots (all treatm
Conclusions all tests
• Chilling injury good inducible
• CO2 injury more difficult to induce in agreement with practice (depending of specific pre harvest conditions?)
• Except for skin spot, disorders hard to induce by this storage stress test
• Can we then study varieties better supported by gene expression level as predictive biomarkers?
Samples for microarray
Cultivar
Genetic background
Max storage period
(optimal conditions)
Texture issues Low Temp
Sensitivity flesh browning
Low O2/high CO2 tolerance
Disorder sensitivity
practice test practice test practice test
Cox
5-6 m Can develop
mealiness before softening
+ +++ ++ - - Bitter pit, brown core, Softening
Golden 8 m +/- - - ++ + Scald
12 arrays INRA, dye swap 6 samples selected 1 wk storage samples, to predict effect of longer storage
Sample for array
start 1 wk -1˚C air 1 wk -1˚C CA
Cox Cox A CoxB Chilling stress
CoxD Chilling stress, less CO2 stress
Golden D GDA GDB No chilling stress
GBD No chilling stress, only CO2 stress
Cox D (cold and CO2) Cox B (cold)
Red= upregulated Blue= down regulated
Redox down regulated Peroxidase up Signalling up Cell wall up Beta glucanase up
Redox is most up Peroxidase down Signalling down regulated Cell wall down regulated
Cox D (cold and CO2): Transport:
aa transport Redox:
ascorbate + glutathione Cell wall:
degradation and modification Cox B (cold) Misc:
cytochrome p450, gluco-galacto-mannosidases, β 1,3 glucan hydrolases, peroxidases
Lipid metabolism:
FA synthesis + elongation and lipid transfer proteins
Data set used is t-test between air and CA storage
Bin name description Cox A Cox B Cox D
cell wall.degradation.mannan-xylose-arabinose-fucoseat4g30270Symbols: MERI5B, MERI-5, SEN4 | MERI5B (meristem-5); hydrolase, acting on glycosyl bonds / xyloglucan:xyloglucosyl transferase | chr4:14819192-14820592 REVERSE0.972 -0.438 -3.058
misc.peroxidases at5g05340peroxidase, putative | chr5:1578951-1580875 REVERSE 1.281 0.768 -2.440
signalling.calcium at3g22910calcium-transporting ATPase, plasma membrane-type, putative / Ca(2+)-ATPase, putative (ACA13) | chr3:8116335-8119388 REVERSE0.365 0.777 -1.175
Bin name description Cox A Cox B Cox D
RNA.regulation of transcription.AP2/EREBP, APETALA2/Ethylene-responsive element binding protein familyat1g22810AP2 domain-containing transcription factor, putative | chr1:8074231-8075037 REVERSE0.277 -0.148 0.519
signalling.receptor kinases.wall associated kinaseat1g21230Symbols: WAK5 | WAK5 (WALL ASSOCIATED KINASE 5); kinase/ protein serine/threonine kinase | chr1:7429980-7432346 FORWARD-0.121 0.475 0.731
fermentation.ADH at1g77120Symbols: ADH1, ADH, ATADH, ATADH1 | ADH1 (ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE 1); alcohol dehydrogenase | chr1:28975394-28977417 FORWARD-0.676 -1.266 1.123
hormone metabolism.ethylene.signal transductionat4g31980unknown protein | chr4:15464905-15469204 FORWARD 0.613914 -0.00336 0.53954
cell wall.cell wall proteins.RGP at5g16510reversibly glycosylated polypeptide, putative | chr5:5392793-5394568 FORWARD-0.32762 0.293879 0.558189
misc.short chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR)at3g51680short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) family protein | chr3:19173622-19174667 REVERSE0.709022 0.208936 0.651472
Bin name description Cox A Cox B Cox D
cell wall.cellulose synthesis at4g07960Symbols: ATCSLC12, CSLC12 | ATCSLC12 (CELLULOSE-SYNTHASE LIKE C12); cellulose synthase/ transferase, transferring glycosyl groups | chr4:4802341-4805647 REVERSE-2.332 -0.534 -1.238
RNA.regulation of transcription.WRKY domain transcription factor familyat1g62300Symbols: WRKY6, ATWRKY6 | WRKY6; transcription factor | chr1:23016683-23019279 REVERSE-2.420 -0.323 -1.049
lipid metabolism.FA synthesis and FA elongation.ACP desaturaseat1g43800acyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) desaturase, putative / stearoyl-ACP desaturase, putative | chr1:16577610-16579722 FORWARD-2.749 -2.224 1.437
Possible stress markers for Cox
10 differential genes found in analysis and also present in literature
Differential expression GD
PCA Golden delicious 1% van genen
GDB= -1°C air
GDD= -1° CA
GD B ( cold) GD D (cold and CO2)
Beta-glucanase= cryo/cold protective
Peroxidases react to high CO2= scavenging radicals
Red= upregulated Blue= down regulated
GD B (cold) Transport:
oa unspecified cations, aa, NDP sugars at the ER
Protein: synthesis, posttranslation modification, degradation
RNA: regulation of transcripts
Stress: biotic PR protein
AA metabolism: synthesis, aromatic aa
Lipid metabolism: exotics oa steroids, squalene and lipid degradation
GD D (cold and CO2) Redox:
ascorbate +glutathion and thioredoxin
C1 metabolism: glycine hydroxymethyltransferase
Dataset used is t-test between air and CA storage
Bin name description GD A GD B GD D
lipid metabolism.''exotics'' (steroids, squalene etc).sphingolipidsat3g61580delta-8 sphingolipid desaturase (SLD1) | chr3:22786047-22787972 FORWARD1.832 -5.553 -2.251
misc.beta 1,3 glucan hydrolases.glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidaseat1g64760glycosyl hydrolase family 17 protein | chr1:24054173-24056414 REVERSE0.530 -4.854 -1.390
cell wall.degradation.cellulases and beta -1,4-glucanasesat1g19940Symbols: AtGH9B5 | AtGH9B5 (Arabidopsis thaliana Glycosyl Hydrolase 9B5); catalytic/ hydrolase, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds | chr1:6918191-6920377 REVERSE1.171 -4.761 -1.890
cell wall.degradation.pectate lyases and polygalacturonasesat4g23820glycoside hydrolase family 28 protein / polygalacturonase (pectinase) family protein | chr4:12397038-12400091 REVERSE0.373 -4.344 -1.692
misc.peroxidases at5g05340peroxidase, putative | chr5:1578951-1580875 REVERSE -1.155 -3.333 -2.265
Bin name description GD A GD B GD D
cell wall.cell wall proteins at3g48530Symbols: KING1 | KING1 (SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE REGULATORY SUBUNIT GAMMA 1) | chr3:17987378-17989763 FORWARD-0.214 -3.963 0.436
amino acid metabolism.degradation.aromatic aa.tryptophanat5g65940Symbols: CHY1 | CHY1 (BETA-HYDROXYISOBUTYRYL-COA HYDROLASE 1); 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase | chr5:26376610-26379235 REVERSE0.145 -3.819 0.422
lipid metabolism.''exotics'' (steroids, squalene etc).sphingolipidsat1g27980Symbols: DPL1, ATDPL1 | DPL1; carboxy-lyase/ catalytic/ pyridoxal phosphate binding | chr1:9748737-9752769 FORWARD0.203 -3.689 0.542
hormone metabolism.gibberelin.synthesis-degradation.ent-kaurenoic acid hydroxylase/oxygenaseat2g32440Symbols: KAO2, CYP88A4 | KAO2 (ENT-KAURENOIC ACID HYDROXYLASE 2); ent-kaurenoate oxidase/ oxygen binding | chr2:13775570-13778002 FORWARD0.511 -3.646 1.499
RNA.regulation of transcription.WRKY domain transcription factor familyat4g31550Symbols: WRKY11, ATWRKY11 | WRKY11; calmodulin binding / transcription factor | chr4:15289947-15291539 REVERSE0.360 -3.616 0.505
cell wall.cellulose synthesis.cellulose synthaseat4g18780Symbols: CESA8, IRX1, ATCESA8, LEW2 | IRX1 (IRREGULAR XYLEM 1); cellulose synthase/ transferase, transferring glycosyl groups | chr4:10312624-10316790 REVERSE1.000 -3.431 0.513
signalling.calcium at4g38810calcium-binding EF hand family protein | chr4:18115283-18119077 REVERSE0.469 -3.369 0.491
cell wall.pectin*esterases.PME at3g29090Symbols: PME31, ATPME31 | pectinesterase family protein | chr3:11073703-11075478 FORWARD0.932 -2.785 0.372
Bin name description GD A GD B GD D
misc.beta 1,3 glucan hydrolases at5g55180glycosyl hydrolase family 17 protein | chr5:22388782-22390714 FORWARD-0.410 1.554 0.445
RNA.regulation of transcription.bZIP transcription factor familyat5g60830Symbols: AtbZIP70 | AtbZIP70 (Arabidopsis thaliana basic leucine-zipper 70); DNA binding / transcription factor | chr5:24472639-24473319 FORWARD-1.615 1.593 -0.530
misc.beta 1,3 glucan hydrolases.glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidaseat5g20340Symbols: BG5 | BG5 (beta-1,3-glucanase 5); glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidase/ hydrolase, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds | chr5:6874787-6875851 FORWARD-1.473 1.712 -0.053
stress.biotic at4g33720pathogenesis-related protein, putative | chr4:16182752-16183533 FORWARD0.154 2.300 0.219
Possible stress markers for GD
12 differential genes from the different tests and also in literature
Ethylene signalling pathway
P.A Wiersma et al Post Harvest Biology and Technology 44 (2007
Methionine + ATP
S-adenosyl methionine (SAM)
ACC-synthase (9)
Md-ACS1, Md-ACS2, Md-ACS3, Md-ACS5
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)
ACC-oxidase (5)
Md-ACO1, Md-ACO2, Md-ACO3, md-ACO4
Ethylene [C2H4]
Receptors (5) Md-ETR1 Md-ERS1 Md-ETR2 Md-ETR5 Md-ETR1b Md-ERS2
AF032448 AY083169 DQ847145 DQ847146 AY821544 AB213028
CTR1 (1) Md-CTR1
AY670703
EIN2 (1) Md-EIN2a Md-EIN2b
CV084545 CO066480
EIN3/EIL (6) Md-EIL1 Md-EIL2 Md-EIL3 uit E. Tacken Plant Physiol. 153 (2010)
GU732484 GU732485 GU732486
ERF Md-ERF1 Md-ERF2 Md-ERF3 Md-ERF4 Md-ERF5 Md-ERF6
AB288347 AB288348 JF412350 JF412351 JF412352 JF412353
uit A. Wang J.Exp.Botany (2007) uit A. Akagi Post Harv.Path.and Mycotoxins (2011)
expressed in fruit
What happens with Ethylene pathway in microarray exp
Ethylene signalling pathway Genes ethylene signalling are checked for allelic variation
Golden delicious genome
RNA seq data Cox and Breaburn
alignment of RNA seq data to golden delicious genome
check for SNP and other variation
• Design qPCR primers on specific conserved regions for each gene
• Some genes have variation compared to GD, consequence of these variations is still being analysed
Can we predict ?
• Perform qPCR on material after 1 wk stress test + 1 wk shelf-life
• Correlate to quality parameters of samples after 3.5 months stress test and 1 wk shelf-life
• Ongoing
Conclusions
• 2-3 months storage at -1°C in CA (1%O2/5%CO2) + 1 wk shelf life can be selective
• GD and Cox behave differently in first week of storage stress
• Several genes selected from known pathway and functions, incl ethylene related genes (EIL1, ERF2)
• Now study correlation among 3 samples of exp 1 and 3 to relate storage potential with gene expression
Wrap-up
– Stress test has potential for screening postharvest behaviour prediction
– Needs further optimisation / standardisation
– Marker selection shows potential
– Last analyses ongoing
Thanks for your attention
top related