physical and numerical visualizations of unsteady ......unsteady turbulent flow past a high-lift...

Post on 23-Jan-2021

16 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Physical and Numerical Physical and Numerical Visualizations of Unsteady Visualizations of Unsteady

Separated Flows Separated FlowsSeparated Flows Separated Flows

Fathi FinaishFathi Finaish

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Missouri University of Science and TechnologyMissouri University of Science and Technology

Great Midwestern Regional Space Grant Consortia Meeting

Cleveland, Ohio

September 24-25, 2009

22

The Hubble Space Telescope snapped this image of a dying starthat looks like a delicate butterfly

33

NASA releases new Hubble photosNASA releases new Hubble photos

This image released by NASA on Wednesday (9/9/09) was taken by the refurbished Hubble Space Telescope. It shows stars bursting to life in the chaotic Carina Nebula.

44

Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission:The Soft Capture MechanismThe Soft Capture Mechanism

• Instrument replacement

• Battery replacement

• Gyro replacement

• Installing the Soft Capture

Mechanism (SCM).

55

Jacopo Frigerio is a Senior Staff Engineer and Project Manager with Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company’s (LMSSC) Engineering Resources & Development organization. Jacopo has 14 years of engineering, design, project management and leadership experience at Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company (SSC), including 8 years in propulsion engineering and 7 years as a project manager leading teams in developing test, prototype and flight hardware. He is also a graduate of the Advanced Technical Leadership Program at SSC. Most recently he has been on a 1 year assignment in the Engineering Resources and Development organization, working to improve Workforce Development and Knowledge Management.

Jacopo Frigerio Lockheed Martin Space Systems

Hubble Servicing Mission Program – Chief Engineer developing the Soft Capture Mechanism

66

Unsteady Separated FlowsUnsteady Separated Flows

Separated flows are encountered in many Separated flows are encountered in many engineering applicationsengineering applications

–– Low and high angle of attack aircraft maneuversLow and high angle of attack aircraft maneuvers–– Turbo machineryTurbo machinery–– Flutter/Transonic flowsFlutter/Transonic flows–– Aircraft stallAircraft stall–– Rocket launchesRocket launches–– ………….. ..

77

An exampleAn example

Separated flows are encountered in many Separated flows are encountered in many practical applicationspractical applications

–– Low and Low and high angle of attack aircraft maneuvershigh angle of attack aircraft maneuvers–– Turbo machineryTurbo machinery–– FlutterFlutter–– Aircraft stallAircraft stall–– Rocket launchesRocket launches–– ………….. ..

unsteady turbulent flow past a high-lift airfoil

88

Steady Attached vs. Steady Attached vs. Unsteady Unsteady SeparatedSeparated FlowsFlows

Attached Flows: Traditional AerodynamicsAttached Flows: Traditional Aerodynamics–– Keep flow attachedKeep flow attached–– Maximize performance (Lift to Drag Ratio)Maximize performance (Lift to Drag Ratio)–– Control boundary layer flow developmentsControl boundary layer flow developments

Separated Flows: New DirectionsSeparated Flows: New Directions–– Force flow separationForce flow separation–– Encourage subsequent vortex formationEncourage subsequent vortex formation–– Control Vortex development and make use of itControl Vortex development and make use of it–– Enhance performance (maneuverability/agility, flow mixing)Enhance performance (maneuverability/agility, flow mixing)

99

CharacteristicsCharacteristics

–– UnsteadyUnsteady–– ThreeThree--DimensionalDimensional–– ViscousViscous–– Turbulent Turbulent –– ……..

Extensive requirement of computational Extensive requirement of computational resourcesresources

Complicated flows physicsphysics

Large parameter space

1010

LimitsLimits

Complex flow physics associated with these flows Complex flow physics associated with these flows coupled with extensive requirement of computational coupled with extensive requirement of computational resources are limiting even ambitious studies to spot resources are limiting even ambitious studies to spot investigations. investigations.

The lack of validation sources prevented calibrations The lack of validation sources prevented calibrations and economic use of computational resources. and economic use of computational resources.

Thus, despite the availability of modern CFD tools, Thus, despite the availability of modern CFD tools, using them in computing separated flows remains to using them in computing separated flows remains to be difficult and expensive. be difficult and expensive.

1111

A few ExamplesA few Examples

1212

High Lift High Lift SystemsSystems

Today CFD is used to design complex high lift Today CFD is used to design complex high lift systems; however, the prediction of systems; however, the prediction of CLCLmaxmax by by direct computation is still difficult.direct computation is still difficult.

Confluent boundary layers and flow separation Confluent boundary layers and flow separation are at the center of the difficulties that computer are at the center of the difficulties that computer code developers and designers of highcode developers and designers of high--lift airfoils lift airfoils must deal with.must deal with.

1313

The tripleThe triple--slotted slotted flap system flap system used on the 737used on the 737

Schematic of Geometry Configuration CFD Simulation

1414

CFD SimulationCFD Simulation

JSF Vertical TakeoffJSF Vertical Takeoff

For multiple jets, an upward flow is created.

Multiple jets Flow Interactions near Ground

Unsteady Separated Flows: An Unsteady Separated Flows: An ExampleExample

1616

Development of an Accelerating Flow Development of an Accelerating Flow Over A High Angle of Attack AirfoilOver A High Angle of Attack Airfoil

L.E

T.E

1717

Development of an Accelerating flow Development of an Accelerating flow over a high angle of attack aircraft wing over a high angle of attack aircraft wing

1818

TwoTwo--Dimensional & Corresponding ThreeDimensional & Corresponding Three--dimensional Flow development downstream of an dimensional Flow development downstream of an accelerated wing model at high angle of attackaccelerated wing model at high angle of attack

L.E Vortex Development

T.E Vortex Sheet Development

1919

Development of a Development of a vortex sheet vortex sheet downstream of an downstream of an accelerated wing at 20 accelerated wing at 20 degrees angle of attackdegrees angle of attack

2020

Turbulence Turbulence

2121

Turbulence Turbulence

Initial Initial StagesStages

2222

Evolution of Turbulent SpotEvolution of Turbulent Spot

2323

Evolution of Turbulent SpotEvolution of Turbulent Spot

2424

Evolution of Turbulent SpotEvolution of Turbulent Spot

2525

Applications and Limit of Applications and Limit of Modern CFD Codes in Modern CFD Codes in Predicting Separated Flow Predicting Separated Flow Developments: A Few ExamplesDevelopments: A Few Examples

26

A Computational Study of the Flow Fields Around Supersonic Airfoils at Low Mach Numbers

Case Study

2727

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

The support for this projects was provided byThe support for this projects was provided by

NASANASACalmar ResearchCalmar ResearchUMRUMR

2828

MotivationMotivation

This work is motivated This work is motivated by the recent efforts on by the recent efforts on the development of the development of Supersonic Business JetsSupersonic Business Jets

Lack of available data on Lack of available data on the development of the development of separation bubbles over separation bubbles over supersonic airfoils at low supersonic airfoils at low Mach numbersMach numbers

2929

Research GoalsResearch Goals

Develop computational procedure to analyze the Develop computational procedure to analyze the development of separated bubbles over supersonic development of separated bubbles over supersonic airfoils.airfoils.

Examine the influence of the bubbles on the Examine the influence of the bubbles on the aerodynamic performance of several airfoils at low aerodynamic performance of several airfoils at low Mach numbers. Mach numbers.

Conduct computational parametric study and Conduct computational parametric study and compare produced results with the limited available compare produced results with the limited available experimental measurementsexperimental measurements

3030

Laminar Separation Bubble (LSB)Laminar Separation Bubble (LSB)

Physics of FormationPhysics of Formation–– Geometry InducedGeometry Induced–– Adverse Pressure GradientAdverse Pressure Gradient–– Reversal of flow in boundary layerReversal of flow in boundary layer

Effect on Aerodynamic PerformanceEffect on Aerodynamic Performance–– Increase in drag Increase in drag –– Onset of StallOnset of Stall–– Promotion of Unsteady FlowPromotion of Unsteady Flow

3131

Schematic of Separation BubbleSchematic of Separation Bubble

3232

Grid Generators EmployedGrid Generators Employed

Surface Grid Generation Surface Grid Generation Aerodynamic Grid and Paneling System (AGPS)Aerodynamic Grid and Paneling System (AGPS)

Volume Grid Generation Volume Grid Generation (Chimera Grid Tools)(Chimera Grid Tools)

3333

Typical Grids Typical Grids Generated around Generated around the Double Wedge the Double Wedge

AirfoilAirfoil

Sharp Leading EdgeSharp Leading Edge4.23% Thick4.23% ThickMax Thickness at MidMax Thickness at Mid--ChordChord

Even Density- 325,440 Total Pts

Top Front- 229,400 Total Pts

3434

325,440 Total Grid Points

3535

Flow Visualizations as Depicted by Flow Visualizations as Depicted by The Flow StreamlinesThe Flow Streamlines

αα = 3.8= 3.8oo, Re = 5.8 X 10 , Re = 5.8 X 10 66, M = 0.17, M = 0.17

3636

Visualizations of Velocity Profiles Visualizations of Velocity Profiles And Pressure DistributionAnd Pressure Distribution

αα = 3.8= 3.8oo, Re = 5.8 X 10 , Re = 5.8 X 10 66, M = 0.17, M = 0.17

3737

Sample of Surface Pressure DistributionSample of Surface Pressure Distribution

αα = 2= 2oo ,Re = 5.8 X 10,Re = 5.8 X 1066, M = 0.17, M = 0.17

3838

αα = 3= 3oo , Re = 5.8 X 10, Re = 5.8 X 1066, M = 0.17, M = 0.17

Sample of Surface Pressure DistributionSample of Surface Pressure Distribution

3939

Comparison of Bubble over Comparison of Bubble over Different Airfoil ConfigurationsDifferent Airfoil Configurations

4040

CFD simulation of separation bubble development and subsequent massive separation over a supersonic airfoil at low Mach number.

Re = 5.8x106, M = 0.17

4141

ConclusionsConclusions

Attached regions are well predicted (Good Attached regions are well predicted (Good agreement outside of LSB region)agreement outside of LSB region)

Pressure plateau is not as prominent as Pressure plateau is not as prominent as experimental data suggests experimental data suggests

Fully Turbulence model implemented over Fully Turbulence model implemented over entire domain correlated best with entire domain correlated best with experimental resultsexperimental results

4242

Current Research EffortsCurrent Research Efforts

Collection of reliable experimental dataCollection of reliable experimental data

33--D ModelingD Modeling

Bubble Modification TechniquesBubble Modification Techniques

43

A Computational Study of A Computational Study of ThreeThree--Dimensional Flow Dimensional Flow Fields in A Mixing ChamberFields in A Mixing Chamber

Case Study

4444

AcknowledgmentAcknowledgment

This project was funded by in part byThis project was funded by in part by

Ruskin Research LaboratoryRuskin Research Laboratory

ASHRAE TRPASHRAE TRP--1045 1045 ““Verifying Mixed Air Verifying Mixed Air Damper Temperature and Air Mixing Damper Temperature and Air Mixing CharacteristicsCharacteristics””

4545

MotivationMotivation

The purpose of the study was to determine The purpose of the study was to determine whether mixed air dampers perform theirwhether mixed air dampers perform theirintended functions of the mixing of twointended functions of the mixing of twostreams of air with dissimilar temperaturesstreams of air with dissimilar temperaturesand COand CO2 2 concentrationconcentration..

4646

Schematic of the Flow Problem: A Typical Flow Through Air Handling Unit

4747

BackgroundBackground

Thermal stratification of the mixed outside and return air streams results in regions of hot and cold air on the conditioning coils.

If the outside air is < 32°F, more serious conditioning coil freezeup and/or tube rupture could occur.

4848

Research GoalsResearch Goals

Develop a CFD model that is useful for studying thermal mixing and flow development.

Use the CFD model to analyze the relationship between thermal mixing and input parameters of damper blade angles and flow velocity ratio.

Identify the flow developments in the mixing chamber that have primary influence on the thermal mixing.

4949

Test FacilityTest Facility

5050

Test FacilityTest Facility

5151

Temperature Sensors at the Mixed Air StationTemperature Sensors at the Mixed Air Station

5252

Comparison with Experimental Measurements

5353

Temperature distribution for best mixing: Configuration 1Temperature distribution for best mixing: Configuration 1

74757575757474737373

73737373737272727271

73737372727372727171

x (inches)

y(in

ches

)

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90

[Best Case]

Confiuration 1 Test No: 7Percent Outside Air: 15 Blade Size of Damper: 6"Outside Air Temperature: 37.0 F Return Air Temperature: 76.9 FThermal Mixing Effectiveness- Range: 0.89 Statistical: 0.95

PLOT OF TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION

5454

Temperature distribution for least mixing in Configuration 1Temperature distribution for least mixing in Configuration 1

64636159575554535253

62616059565452515053

63616160585856555465

x (inches)

y(in

ches

)

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90

[Worst Case]

Confiuration 1 Test No: 6Percent Outside Air: 30 Blade Size of Damper: 4"Outside Air Temperature: 35.2 F Return Air Temperature: 74.3 FThermal Mixing Effectiveness- Range: 0.62 Statistical: 0.79

PLOT OF TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION

5555

View of Typical Grid 26 Blocks, 174,160 Grid Points

5656

CrossCross--section of Mixing Chambersection of Mixing Chamber

5757

An example shows dimensionless Flow Speed of outside airflow in the mixing chamber.

VOA=1,500 fpm, OA damper angle = 0°

5858

ThreeThree--dimensional flow computation in a mixing Chamber. dimensional flow computation in a mixing Chamber. Dimensionless flow speed distributionDimensionless flow speed distribution

5959

Visualization of vortex development in the mixing chamber. VRA=1,500 fpm

6060

Flow visualization of outdoor and return airflows in the mixing chamber.

6161

Samples of Temperature Distribution in the mixing chamber

VOA=VRA=1,500 fpm : fRA=fOA=0°

6262

Comparison of Temperature Distributions VOA=VRA=1,500 fpm

0° 30° 45° 60°

6363

ConclusionsConclusions

The temperature distribution in the Mixing chamber is determined Primarily by the Velocity Ratio.

Temperature Mixing Effectiveness Increases with Downstream Distance

The Mixing Effectiveness Generally Increases with Increasing Velocity Ratio and with Increasing Damper Angle

6464

Final Concluding RemarksFinal Concluding Remarks

6565

Final ConclusionsFinal Conclusions

The two examples presented demonstrate the application of The two examples presented demonstrate the application of modern CFD tools in simulating external and internal flow modern CFD tools in simulating external and internal flow configurations dominated by separated flows. configurations dominated by separated flows.

While the simulation results correlated well with While the simulation results correlated well with corresponding experimental measurements, flow computations corresponding experimental measurements, flow computations in the separated bubble (example 1) and the upstream flow in the separated bubble (example 1) and the upstream flow region deviated considerably from experimental region deviated considerably from experimental measurements. measurements.

The second example reveals the complex flow interactions The second example reveals the complex flow interactions between the two airflow streams as dominated by flow between the two airflow streams as dominated by flow separation and subsequent vortex developments downstream in separation and subsequent vortex developments downstream in the mixing chamber. There still need for further experimental the mixing chamber. There still need for further experimental measurements, in order to assess the simulation results.measurements, in order to assess the simulation results.

6666

Final ConclusionsFinal Conclusions

Obtaining reliable experimental measurement Obtaining reliable experimental measurement and visualizations of separated flows would be and visualizations of separated flows would be useful resource for assessing, calibrating, and useful resource for assessing, calibrating, and economizing the use of modern CFD tools. economizing the use of modern CFD tools.

Experimental data needs to be collected with Experimental data needs to be collected with careful attention paid toward the free stream careful attention paid toward the free stream and wall conditions, as these are required for and wall conditions, as these are required for successful validations of parallel successful validations of parallel computational efforts. computational efforts.

6767

OutlookOutlookExploring possibilities of utilizing separated flows in many Exploring possibilities of utilizing separated flows in many engineering application may lead to new fruitful opportunities engineering application may lead to new fruitful opportunities in the future. in the future.

For instance, new flow control technologies and techniques to For instance, new flow control technologies and techniques to control massive flow separation may open up new control massive flow separation may open up new opportunities in making effective use of separated flows in a opportunities in making effective use of separated flows in a wide range of engineering applications. wide range of engineering applications.

However, understanding of these flows still limited. However, understanding of these flows still limited.

Experimental and computational studies that been conducted Experimental and computational studies that been conducted on unsteady separated flows revealed complex flow physics on unsteady separated flows revealed complex flow physics associated with these flows and the challenge to document their associated with these flows and the challenge to document their time dependent nature. time dependent nature.

6868

fiftywithtime.wmv

top related