private-to-private corruption: how to make the companies the remedy, not the cause of corruption...
Post on 18-Jan-2018
217 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
PRIVATE-TO-PRIVATE CORRUPTION:HOW TO MAKE THE COMPANIES THE
REMEDY, NOT THE CAUSE OF CORRUPTION
Antonio ArgandoñaEmeritus Professor, “la Caixa” Chair of
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate GovernanceIESE Business School
Conference “Reducing Corruption: Focusing on Private Sector”Tallinn, 11-12 February 2016
“Business should work againstcorruption in all its forms,
including extortion and bribery”
UN Global Compact, 10th principle
2Prof. Antonio Argandoña
3Prof. Antonio Argandoña
V. Lucas and J. Gutmann, “Unbundling Private- and Public-SectorCorruption: Insights Based on Two New Indicators”, 2015
There are several definitions of private corruption
Any misconduct in the organization, any act forbidden by law
“The abuse of public office for private gain” (World Bank 1997)
“The abuse of a position of trust for obtaining a dishonest profit”
“The misuse of an organizational position or authority for personal gain (…), where misuse (…) refers to departure from accepted societal norms”
(Anand, Ashforth & Joshi 2004)
4Prof. Antonio Argandoña
… and there are many varieties of corruption
Bribery and extortion or solicitationCommissions, gifts, hospitality, favorsAbuse of power or influence, embezzlement of property or
funds, fraudConflict of interest, nepotism, favoritism, cronyism, influence
peddlingIncorrect use of privileged informationIllegal financing of political parties or campaignsMoney launderingOrganized crime, mafia, 'protection', kleptomaniac State
5Prof. Antonio Argandoña
•Companies should not ignore any variety of corrupt behavior
6Prof. Antonio Argandoña
7Prof. Antonio Argandoña
Less corruptionMore corruption
Less corruption
More corruption
V. Lucas and J. Gutmann, “Unbundling Private- and Public-SectorCorruption: Insights Based on Two New Indicators”, 2015
Private vs. public corruption
Private corruption is not so bad!For-profit companies are efficient in protecting their interestsThere are fewer incentives in private companiesCorrupt practices may increase the efficiency There is less private corruption (or have we less information?)
Oh, no! It is really bad! And dangerous!Connection with public corruption: the distinction becomes
irrelevantGlobalization, competition risk of proliferation leveling the
playing field More legal pressure companies are now more awareIncreasing social awareness: the attitudes are changing
8Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• Private corruption is no less bad than public corruption, and its consequences are not lighter
• The difference between public and private corruption is becoming irrelevant
9Prof. Antonio Argandoña
Causes of private corruption
1a. The rotten apple: the individual is the problemCorruption as a personal, isolated behavior: transaction level Benefit, probability of being captured and cost of capture
1b. The rotten apple in the basket: the individual works in a companyThe individual (and the company?) are the beneficiaries
The organization ignores (or pretends to ignore)
An organization with corrupt individuals
10Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• On a personal level, corruption is seen as an incentive problem
11Prof. Antonio Argandoña
2. The basket that rots the fruits: the organization is at center stageA corrupt organization
Corruption rooted in the culture of the company“If we don’t pay bribes we cannot do business”“This is the normal way of doing business here”
The organization ignores, allows or promote corrupt practices
MechanismsStructure: tasks, responsibilities, rules, procedures…
incentives!Culture: shared ideas, expectations, values, visions,
customsBureaucratic culture: loyalty, conformity… pride,
arrogance, hubris… collusionCulture may be a predictor of corrupt conduct
12Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• For companies, corruption is always an organizational problem
• Companies have a key role in the fight against corruption, both public and private
13Prof. Antonio Argandoña
3. The corrupt warehouse that pollutes many baskets: the social / political / cultural dimensionsCorruption is a common practice of the industry or the country
“Everybody does it” “Greed is good”
Legal, political, institutional environmentBusiness environment: rent-seeking Social, cultural, moral ideas: the decline of values
14Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• Individuals and companies suffer the consequences of the social, moral and political environment in which they move
• And, therefore, companies should take an active role in the fight against corruption in their environment
15Prof. Antonio Argandoña
16Prof. Antonio Argandoña
The costs of private and public corruption for the companies
1. High costsDirect costs: higher costs, lower revenues
Transaction costs, not selling or buying at the best price, quality or service
Financial costs of the corrupt actionsLocked-in with accomplices, uncertainty about the pay-off Fines and jail (for the individual and the organization),
reputation loss, rejection of clients, employees and investorsHigh long-term costs: contagion, social reactions, changing
anti-corruption climate, reorganization costsLong-term practices doesn’t mean long-term gains
Indirect costs: misrepresenting financial information, opacity, loss of governance quality, discomfort of employees, tax evasion
2. Undesirable learningExtension to other areas of the firmOther kinds of immoral behavior: putting the personal interest in front
of the company’s Adverse selectionLoss of trust and unity
3. It is a bad strategyUncertain outcomes, undifferentiated, easy to imitate, it
discourages innovative strategies, difficult to change, diminishing competitive advantage
Resource misallocation, capability-building deterrence, lack of confidence and credibility
Problematic leadershipIt could become endogenousRisk of blackmail
17Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• In a cost-benefit analysis, corruption is probably a mistake
• Corruption is bad management
18Prof. Antonio Argandoña
Private corruption is costly also for the industry
1. An uneven playing field
2. Undesirable learning, unethical atmosphere
3. Deterioration of the business environmentUnderground economy, fiscal fraudDifficulties to act according to the lawHarsher regulations and controlsReputation hamperedThe appearance of the “specialist”
4. It could become endemicIt is difficult to eradicate
19Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• If there is corruption in one sector, the consequences for the companies are always bad
• Companies must be active in the fight against corruption in their environment
20Prof. Antonio Argandoña
Anti-corruption strategies are changing
Traditional strategies: fighting public, domestic corruption
1970s: fighting international public corruption: US Foreign Corrupt Pratices Act 1977Ethical arguments, national legislation, emphasis in demand side
New strategiesEconomic arguments Involvement of international financial
institutions International conventions: OAS, Council of Europe, OECD, UNCAC,
AU Involve more countries, international cooperationIndependent monitoringEnlarge de concept of corruption: private corruption is part of the
problem
21Prof. Antonio Argandoña
Emphasis in the supply side The problem is in the organizations Multistakeholder cooperation Companies are an important part of the solutionEthics and compliance programs: US Organizational Sentencing
Guidelines 1991, UK Bribery Act 2010Economics is not enough: change the organizational
cultureIntegrated, preventive and corrective complianceIntegrated: legal, tax, competition, anti-
corruption, environmentMaking the adoption of corporate principles mandatoryDetect and respond, investigate
Disclose, open communication
Problem-solving approachPrivate and public (and other misconducts too)
22Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• Companies should develop ethics and compliance programs integrating all risks under the supervision and with the commitment of top management, and engaging everyone in the company
• Managers must understand the nature of the risks, their characters, how they depend on the context, power and market imperfections and how society and prosecutors understand it: it is not what you think but how the prosecutors perceives it
• Employees should be aware of the risks and costs of corruption, must understand how to protect themselves and the company and what to do when problems arise
• SME: do what you can, but do it!
23Prof. Antonio Argandoña
Ethical arguments
The person who receives the bribe: injustice and disloyalty towards the companyFails to fulfill his due, abuses a position of power
The person who pays the bribe: accomplice or instigatorPossible damages to the company
Lower quality of products, worse conditions...Reputational riskContagion Lack of transparency, falsification of records
Injustice to competitorsHarm to society
Encouraging corruption, opacity
24Prof. Antonio Argandoña
• Ethics is necessary to fight corruption
• But ethics is not enough if it does not translate into adequate rules, structures, incentives, customs, controls, accountability, role models and professionalism
• Law and judges are also necessary, but not enough: the “carrot and stick” approach has limitations, if not accompanied by higher inner motivations
25Prof. Antonio Argandoña
“The morality of a companyis as strong as the morality of the
weakest employee.We are all links in a chain”
Ron SugarPresident and CEO, Northrop Grumman
argandona@iese.eduhttp://blog.iese.edu/antonioargandona
Thank you!
top related