probing classically conformal b-l model with …seminar/pdf_2016_zenki/.../ 60 probing classically...

Post on 19-May-2020

13 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

/ 60

Probing classically conformal B-L model with gravitational waves

Ryusuke Jinno (KEK)

Based on arXiv:1604.05035 (by RJ & Masahiro Takimoto)

July 19th, 2016 @ Osaka Univ.

1

/ 60

Introduction & Conclusion

2

/ 60

FIRST DECECTION OF GWS

LIGO announcement @ 2016/2/11

- Black hole binary

36M⊙ + 29M⊙ →62M⊙

with 3.0M⊙ radiated in GWs

- Frequency ~ 35 to 250 Hz

- Significance > 5.1σ

3

/ 60

FIRST DECECTION OF GWS

LIGO announcement @ 2016/2/11

- Black hole binary

36M⊙ + 29M⊙ →62M⊙

with 3.0M⊙ radiated in GWs

- Frequency ~ 35 to 250 Hz

- Significance > 5.1σ

The era of

Gravitational-wave astronomy

has come

4

/ 60

Next will come Gravitational-wave “COSMOLOGY”

FROM ASTRONOMYTO COSMOLOGY

KAGRA と DECIGO

原始重力波シンポ (日本物理学会 2014年秋季大会, 2014年9月19日, 佐賀大学) 49

KAGRA (~2017)Ground-based DetectorÆ 高周波数 の重力波イベント

目標: 重力波の検出, 天文学

DECIGO (~2030)Space observatoryÆ 低周波数 の重力波

目標: 宇宙論的な知見など

From Ando-san’s talk @日本物理学会2014年秋季大会 5

/ 60

Next will come Gravitational-wave “COSMOLOGY”

FROM ASTRONOMYTO COSMOLOGY

重力波天文学のロードマップ

原始重力波シンポ (日本物理学会 2014年秋季大会, 2014年9月19日, 佐賀大学) 58

2010

2015

2020

2025

~10 event/yrのイベントレート

地上望遠鏡

KAGRAAd. LIGO

LIGO TAMA

EnhancedLIGO

CLIO

Advanced LIGO KAGRA Advanced

Virgo

VIRGOGEO

ET

より遠くを観測 (10Hz-1kHz)宇宙望遠鏡

0.1mHz-10mHz確実な重力波源

0.1Hz帯宇宙論的な重力波

低周波数帯の観測 (1Hz以下)

LPF

DECIGO

DECIGO

LISA

BBO

LPFDPF

Pre-DECIGOLISA

Note : + Recent progress in “Atomic interferometry”[See papers by Stanford group,

e.g. Dimopoulos et al., PLB ’09]

From Ando-san’s talk @日本物理学会2014年秋季大会 6

/ 60

FROM ASTRONOMYTO COSMOLOGY

eLISA⌦GWh2

GW frequency [Hz]

100 10410�4

http://rhcole.com/apps/GWplotter/ OR arXiv:1408.0740

LISA DECIGO

BBO

7

/ 60

Next will come Gravitational-wave “COSMOLOGY”

FROM ASTRONOMYTO COSMOLOGY

- Space interferometers (LISA, BBO, DECIGO,...) are planned in the future

What kind of cosmology can we search by GWs ?

- Inflationary quantum fluctuations

- Preheating

- Cosmic strings, domain walls

- First-order phase transition

8

/ 60

FROM ASTRONOMYTO COSMOLOGY

- Electroweak symmetry breaking

- SUSY breaking

- PQ symmetry breaking

- GUT breaking ...

Many particle-physics candidates- Inflationary quantum fluctuations

- Preheating

- Cosmic strings, domain walls

- First-order phase transition

- Space interferometers (LISA, BBO, DECIGO,...) are planned in the future

Next will come Gravitational-wave “COSMOLOGY”

What kind of cosmology can we search by GWs ?

9

/ 60

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

“Classical conformal” models

can lead to first-order PT

with large amount of gravitational waves

10

/ 60

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

“Classical conformal” models

can lead to phase transition

with large amount of gravitational waves

KEYs1. BIG bubbles

2. ULTRA supercooling in the early universe

11

/ 60

TALK PLAN

0. Introduction & Conclusion

1. GW production in cosmic phase transition (General)

2. GWs produced in classicaly conformal B-L model (Model specific)

3. Conclusion

Extra stage. Recent progress in GW calc. from bubble collisions

12

/ 60

1. GW production in cosmic phase transition

13

/ 6014

Quantum tunneling

Φ

V

false vacuum true vacuum

released energy

(thermal trap)

← ~ T →

Bubble formation & GW production

false

x3

true

true

true

ROUGH SKETCH

Field space Position space

1. Bubbles nucleate

/ 6015

Quantum tunneling

Φ

V

Bubble formation & GW production

x3

false vacuum true vacuum

released energy

(thermal trap)

← ~ T →

Field space Position space

true

true

true

2. Bubbles expand

3. PT completes when bubbles collide

1. Bubbles nucleate

ROUGH SKETCH

/ 6016

Quantum tunneling

Φ

V

Bubble formation & GW production

GWs

x3

false vacuum true vacuum

released energy

(thermal trap)

← ~ T →Released energy localized around walls sources GWs

⇤hij ⇠ GT (wall)ij⇤hij ⇠ GT (wall)ij

true

Field space Position space

true

true

ROUGH SKETCHds

2 = �dt

2 + a

2(t)(�ij + 2hij)dxidx

j

Def. of GWs

/ 6017

Bubble formation & GW prod. occur and complete when...

Γ ~ H4 Γ : Bubble nucleation rate per unit time & vol.

H : Hubble parameter

ROUGH SKETCH

because finds bubbles when

Γ × vol × t ~ 1

H -1H -3

is satisfiedH-3, vol ~H-1radius ~

: Hubble horizon

c

H ⌘ a

aHubble parameter :

/ 6018

Bubble formation & GW prod. occur and complete when...

Γ ~ H4 Γ : Bubble nucleation rate per unit time & vol.

H : Hubble parameter

ROUGH SKETCH

because finds bubbles when

Γ × vol × t ~ 1

H -1H -3

is satisfied

cGWs

H-3, vol ~H-1radius ~

: Hubble horizon

H ⌘ a

aHubble parameter :

/ 6019

NO scattering = NO information lossbecause of Planck-suppressed interactions

ROUGH SKETCH

present

Redshift

GWs

tΓ ~ H 4

After production, GWs evolve just by redshifting

Then, what makes LARGE GWs?

20

KEY 1BIG bubbles

21

/ 6022

Why ?

BIG bubbles

small bubbles

⌦GW

⌘ 1

⇢tot

d⇢GW

d ln k: Hubble radius

at the transition

BIG bubbles produce LARGE GWs

→ LONG time for GW sourcing

→ LONG time from nucleation to PT completion

: GW amplitude

BIG bubbles

GW frequency

/ 6023

Typical bubble size ~ β

- Taylor expansion β(t - t )Γ ~ Γ e* *Taylor exp.

around t*

t * : typical transition time(when Γ ~ H )4

-1- Γ changes significantly with timescale β

(because many bubbles start to nucleate here and there after this time)

How to make BIG bubbles

- Then, bubbles can expand only for t ~ t + (a few) * *-1β

t = t* →t = t + (a few)*t = t +*→

-1β -1β

-1

/ 6024

Typical bubble size ~ β

- Taylor expansion β(t - t )Γ ~ Γ e* *Taylor exp.

around t*

t * : typical transition time(when Γ ~ H )4

-1- Γ changes significantly with timescale β

(because many bubbles start to nucleate here and there after this time)

How to make BIG bubbles

- Then, bubbles can expand only for t ~ t + (a few) * *-1β

t = t* →t = t + (a few)*t = t +*→

-1β -1β

-1

BIG bubblesll

SMALL βll

SLOWLY changing nucleation rate

KEY 2ULTRA supercooling

25

/ 6026

false

true

wall

friction

pressure

scalar+plasma dynamics

ULTRA supercooling makes LARGE GWs

Before explaining why, ...

scalar field & plasma

- In thermal PT, two main players :

- Let’s see qualitative classification of bubble-wall behavior

- Walls (where the scalar field value changes)

want to expand (“pressure”) / but are pushed back by plasma (“friction”)

/ 6027

ULTRA supercooling makes LARGE GWs

false

true

wall

friction

pressure

scalar+plasma dynamics

potential

falsetrue

- Roughly speaking,

determines bubble-wall behavior

Before explaining why, ...

↵ ⌘ ✏⇤/⇢radiation

(R) Runaway case

(T) Terminal velocity case

Wall velocity approaches Energy dominated by

speed of light (c)

terminal velocity (< c)

scalar field

plasma bulk motion

↵ & O(10�2)

↵ . O(10�2)

Note : is model dependent↵ . O(10�2)

↵ � 1( )

/ 6028

- (R) Runaway case,Kinetic & gradient of the scalar fieldcarries energy

- (T) Terminal veolcity case

Φ

r

true

false

Φ

r

true

false

Before explaining why, ...

reaches terminal vel. ( < c )

reaches speed of light ( c )

ULTRA supercooling makes LARGE GWs

↵ � 1( )

/ 6029

- (R) Runaway case,Kinetic & gradient of the scalar fieldcarries energy

- (T) Terminal veolcity case

Φ

r

true

false

Φ

r

true

false

Bulk motion of plasma fluid around walls

Before explaining why, ...

reaches terminal vel. ( < c )

reaches speed of light ( c )

ULTRA supercooling makes LARGE GWs

↵ � 1( )

Heated-up plasma

/ 6030

Why’s ULTRA supercooling favorable ?

- Focus on (R) Runaway case, since this occurs in our model

- In this case, large α (ULTRA supercooling) makes LARGE GWs

Rough sketch

simply because walls source GWs

↵ ⌘ ✏⇤/⇢radiation

small αlarge α

wall

rad

wall

rad8<

:{

sourceGWs

sourceGWs

ULTRA supercooling makes LARGE GWs

↵ � 1( )

Let’s see some equations

31

/ 6032

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

⌦GW(t, k)

/ 6033

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

⌦GW(t, k)

/ 6034

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

⌦GW(t, k)

/ 6035

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

GW power spectrum from bubble collisions

⌦GW,peak(t⇤) ⇠ O(10�2)

✓�

H⇤

◆�2 ✓↵

1 + ↵

◆2

maximal fraction which goes into GWs

label for transition time

:*# of bubbles in one Hubble radius( )

-2 wall energy

total energy( )

2

⌦GW(t, k)

/ 6036

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

GW power spectrum from bubble collisions

⌦GW,peak(t⇤) ⇠ O(10�2)

✓�

H⇤

◆�2 ✓↵

1 + ↵

◆2

maximal fraction which goes into GWs

label for transition time

:*# of bubbles in one Hubble radius( )

-2 wall energy

total energy( )

2

⌦GW(t, k)

/ 6037

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

GW power spectrum from bubble collisions

⌦GW,peak(t⇤) ⇠ O(10�2)

✓�

H⇤

◆�2 ✓↵

1 + ↵

◆2

maximal fraction which goes into GWs

label for transition time

:*# of bubbles in one Hubble radius( )

-2 wall energy

total energy( )

2

⌦GW(t, k)

/ 6038

FIRST DECECTION OF GWS

LIGO announcement @ 2016/2/11

- Black hole binary

36M⊙ + 29M⊙ →62M⊙

with 3.0M⊙ radiated in GWs

- Frequency ~ 35 to 250 Hz

- Significance > 5.1σO(1)%

/ 6039

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

GW power spectrum from bubble collisions

⌦GW,peak(t⇤) ⇠ O(10�2)

✓�

H⇤

◆�2 ✓↵

1 + ↵

◆2

maximal fraction which goes into GWs

label for transition time

:*# of bubbles in one Hubble radius( )

-2 wall energy

total energy( )

2

⌦GW(t, k)

BIG bubbles

/ 6040

GWs from bubble collisions

⌦GW

(t) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

(t)

d⇢GW

(t)

d ln k

GW power spectrum (def.)

GW energy densitydecomposed into each lnk

normalized by total (= wall & radiation) energy density

GW power spectrum from bubble collisions

⌦GW,peak(t⇤) ⇠ O(10�2)

✓�

H⇤

◆�2 ✓↵

1 + ↵

◆2

maximal fraction which goes into GWs

label for transition time

:*# of bubbles in one Hubble radius( )

-2 wall energy

total energy( )

2

⌦GW(t, k)

ULTRA supercooling

↵ ⌘ ✏⇤/⇢radiation

/ 6041

Summary so far

Two keys to make LARGE GWs

- BIG bubbles

- ULTRA supercooling

/ 60

2. GW production in classically conformal B-L model

42

/ 60

CLASSICALLY CONFORMAL

What is “classically conformal” ?

- Classically no mass scale & violation of scale invariance by quantum effect

- Naturalness problem

Motivation

(Coleman-Weinberg mechanism)

V0 ⇠ �(�)�4

M

Rough sketch

� < 0 � > 0

[Bardeen ‘95]

produces the EW scale|�|2|H|2

43

/ 60

Gauge & matter content

- Gauge :

- Matter :

Gauge couping gB�L

(equivalently, )↵B�L = g2B�L/4⇡

CLASSICALLY CONFORMAL B-L MODEL

[Iso et. al., ‘09]

44

/ 60

Zero temperature potential

� < 0�

V0 ⇠ �(�)�4

M

- Quartic terms + No mass terms

+ no mass terms

- Scale is induced by the running of (determined by )gB�L

V0 ⇠ �(�)�4

~ M

� > 0

(“classically no-scale” assumption)

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

tree

45

/ 60

Zero temperature potential

� < 0�

V0 ⇠ �(�)�4

M

- Scale is induced by the running of (determined by )gB�L

V0 ⇠ �(�)�4

~ M

� > 0

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

46

/ 60

Finite temperature potential

- Thermal mass + Quartic V ⇠ g2B�LT2�2

+ �(max(T,�))�4

V

M

g2B�LT2�2

thermal mass

��4(� < 0)

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

47

/ 60

Finite temperature potential

M

g2B�LT2�2

- As temperature changes, ...

T

V��4(� < 0)

�/T

V/T 4g2B�LT

2�2 ��4(� < 0)

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

- Thermal mass + Quartic V ⇠ g2B�LT2�2

+ �(max(T,�))�4

T is the only mass scale

relevant to tunneling

All dimensionful quantities

normalized by T

48

/ 60

Finite temperature potential

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

- Thermal mass + Quartic V ⇠ g2B�LT2�2

+ �(max(T,�))�4

- As temperature changes, ...

�/T

V/T 4g2B�LT

2�2 ��4(� < 0)

M

g2B�LT2�2

V��4(� < 0)

T

49

/ 60

Finite temperature potential

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

- Thermal mass + Quartic V ⇠ g2B�LT2�2

+ �(max(T,�))�4

M

g2B�LT2�2

- As temperature changes, ...

�/T

V/T 4g2B�LT

2�2 ��4(� < 0)

V��4(� < 0)

T

50

/ 60

Finite temperature potential

POTENTIAL BEHAVIOR

- Thermal mass + Quartic V ⇠ g2B�LT2�2

+ �(max(T,�))�4

- As temperature changes, ...

potential structure at the origin SLOWLY changes (~ beta function)

M

g2B�LT2�2

V��4(� < 0)

51

/ 60

Γ ~ O(T ) e -S /T34 dimensionless

Note : Usually does not hold since m/T (m : mass scale of the potential) enters

g2B�LT2�2 ��4(� < 0)

Nucleation rate is calculated with “bounce method”

S /T depends only on couplings, not on T (since it’s dimensionless!)3

S3/T ⇠ 10gB�L

|�|

Nucleation rate Γ changes SLOWLY (with beta function)

Key 1 : BIG bubbles(slowly-changing nucl. rate)

52

/ 60

S /T depends only on couplings, not on T (since it’s dimensionless!)3

Γ ~ O(T ) e -S /T34 dimensionless

Note : Usually does not hold since m/T (m : mass scale of the potential) enters

g2B�LT2�2 ��4(� < 0)

Nucleation rate is calculated with “bounce method”

S3/T ⇠ 10gB�L

|�|

Nucleation rate Γ changes SLOWLY (with beta function)

SLOWLY changing nucleation ratell

BIG bubblesll

LARGE GWs

53

Key 1 : BIG bubbles(slowly-changing nucl. rate)

/ 60

Transition occurs at very low temperature

- Phase transition occurs when →�H4 ⇠ 1 S ⇠ 100

KEY 2 : ULTRA supercooling

(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)

M

g2B�LT2�2

V

↵B�L = 0.016↵B�L = 0.008S

T/M

54

/ 60

Transition occurs at very low temperature

- Phase transition occurs when →�H4 ⇠ 1 S ⇠ 100

(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)

M

g2B�LT2�2

V

↵B�L = 0.016↵B�L = 0.008S

T/M

This small gradient

gives small β (prev. slide)

This small T/M gives large α(Need to wait until

couplings run significantly!)

55

KEY 2 : ULTRA supercooling

/ 60

Transition occurs at very low temperature

- Phase transition occurs when →�H4 ⇠ 1 S ⇠ 100

(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)

M

g2B�LT2�2

V

↵B�L = 0.016↵B�L = 0.008S

T/M

This small gradient

gives small β (prev. slide)

This small T/M gives large α(Need to wait until

couplings run significantly!)Transition succeeds

Transition fails

Note :

In the actual calc.,

we use more

sophisticated cond.

56

KEY 2 : ULTRA supercooling

/ 60

Transition occurs at very low temperature

- Phase transition occurs when →�H4 ⇠ 1 S ⇠ 100

(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)(� ⇠ O(T 4)e�S3/T ⇠ M4e�S3/T+4 ln(T/M) ⌘ M4e�S)

M

g2B�LT2�2

V

↵B�L = 0.016↵B�L = 0.008S

T/M

This small gradient

gives small β (prev. slide)

This small T/M gives large α(Need to wait until

couplings run significantly!)Transition succeeds

Transition fails

Note :

In the actual calc.,

we use more

sophisticated cond.

ULTRA supercoolingoccurs in this model

57

KEY 2 : ULTRA supercooling

/ 60

Peak frequency & amplitude of the GW spectrum

: Above this → Landau poles below Mp: Below this → Successful PT does not occur: Left to this → Excluded by Z’ mass constraint

RESULT : LARGE GWS

(at present)[Hz]

M ⌘ h�i↵B�L : Gauge coupling at scaleM

58

/ 60

Detectability in the future

: eLISA: LISA: DECIGO: BBO

(Regions below dashed lines are detectable)

RESULT : LARGE GWS

59

/ 60

CONCLUSION

The era of GW cosmology will come

“No mass scale” at the classical levelKey

Two keys to produce LARGE GWs

- BIG bubbles / - ULTRA supercooling

Classically conformal models satisfy these conditions

and may be tested in future experiments

60

/ 60

Backup

61

/ 6062

GW FREQUENCY

Just redshift strating from transition time

fpeak ⇠ �

H⇤

T⇤108GeV

[Hz]

Hubble-size wave at T = 10^8GeVis stretched to 1Hz by redshift

# of bubbles in one Hubble radius

label for transition time

:*

/ 6063

CONDITION FOR SUCCESSFUL PT

We require transition occur in ~ CMB patch simultaneously

- Survival prob.

- I function behaves like →

- We require I > 100 for T → 0

(“no transition patch” should be

very rare)

/ 6064

THIN-WALL & ENVELOPE

How good are thin-wall & envelope approximations?

- In (R) Runaway case,

envelope approx. → almost justified

thin-wall approx. → justified

Φ

r

energy is stored as kinetic & gradient of the scalar field

no energy sourcingfor collided walls(just the remaining scalar field oscillation)

(N.B. sound wave-enhancement of (T) Terminal velocity case)

- (R) Runaway case is the one where large GW amplitude is expected

n

[Kosowski et al. ‘92]

/ 6065

Estimation of the transition rate

BOUNCE CALCULATION

- Transition rate can be calculated

Φ

V

S ~ 3

Zd3r

✓1

2�0(r)2 + V (�)

◆ll

V0

Vthermal

(temp.-independent)

(temp.-dependent)

~ T

from potential shape

How can we determine

Φ as a function of r ?

Γ ~ O(T ) e4 -S / T3 (in our setup)

/ 6066

Estimation of the transition rate

BOUNCE CALCULATION

- Transition rate can be calculated

Φ

V

Γ ~ O(T ) e4 -S / T3

S ~ 3

Zd3r

✓1

2�0(r)2 + V (�)

from potential shape

Φ

-V

r = infinity

r = 0

with

Φ : solution of �00(r) +2

r�0(r)� dV

d�= 0

(so-called “bounce”)

/ 6067

BOUNCE CALCULATION

Estimation of the transition rate

- Then we can calculate β

since it is just Taylor expansion coefficient

Γ ~ Γ e*β(t - t )*

� ' d(S3/T )

dt' H

d(S3/T )

d lnT

(= how fast transition rate changes, )

/ 6068

ROUGH ESTIMATION OF GW AMP.

10!4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100f!Hz"

10!13

10!11

10!9

10!7

"GW

BBODECIGOLISAeLISA

Detector sensitivities

: eLISA: LISA: DECIGO: BBO- Present GW spectrum

fpeak ⇠ �

H⇤

T⇤108GeV

[Hz]

duration time

h2⌦GW,peak ⇠ O(10�2)O(10�5)

✓�

H⇤

◆2 ✓↵

1 + ↵

◆2

~radiation fraction today~quadrupole factor

cf. SM with → �/H ⇠ O(105),

↵ ⇠ O(0.001)mH ⇠ 10 GeV, �/H ⇠ O(105),

↵ ⇠ O(0.001)

-

Rough estimation of GW amplitude

/ 60

Analytic GW spectrum from bubble collisions

Ryusuke Jinno (KEK)

Based on arXiv:1605.01403 (by RJ & Masahiro Takimoto)

July 19th, 2016 @ Osaka Univ.

69

EXTRA STAGE

/ 6070

Same as the previous talk

Let’s focus on (R) Runaway case.

Then, the main GW source is bubble wall collisions.

MOTIVATIONS

Note : In (T) Terminal vel. case, dominant source is said to be

sound waves & turbulence (these occurs due to plasma bulk motion)

/ 6071

We must fix theoretical prediction for GW spectrum

GW spectrum from bubble collisions is usually calculated

by NUMERICAL SIMULATION with some reasonable approx’s

WHAT PEOPLE HAVE USUALLY DONE

/ f�1 ? f�2 ?

∝frequency

ΩGW

Statistical error

fall-off?

[Huber et al., ‘08]

computer

/ 6072

We must fix theoretical prediction for GW spectrum

GW spectrum from bubble collisions is usually calculated

by NUMERICAL SIMULATION with some reasonable approx’s

WHAT PEOPLE HAVE USUALLY DONE

/ f�1 ? f�2 ?

∝frequency

ΩGW

Statistical error

fall-off?

[Huber et al., ‘08]

computer

→Statistical error&

Uncertain high-frequency fall-off

/ 6073

GW spectrum from bubble collisions is

WHAT WE DID

Exactlydetermined by analytic calculation

in the same setup as in numerical simulations

/ 6074

INGREDIENTSTO CALCULATE GW SPECTRUM

Definition of GWs : ds

2 = �dt

2 + a

2(t)(�ij + 2hij)dxidx

j

Tij is determined by

- Bubble nucelation rate ( )

- Energy-momentum profile around nucleated bubbles

⇤hij = 8⇡GKij,klTkl

projection to tensor mode

Energy-momentum tensor (from bubble walls)

We need thisPropagation of GWs :

Γ = Γ e*β(t - t )*

/ 6075

APPROX’S USUALLY ADOPTED

All energy is assumed to be condensed in a thin surface of the wall.

false

true thin wall

Thin-wall Envelope

lB

Thin-wall & envelope approximations

[Kosowsky, Turner, Watkins, PRD45 (’92)]

Collided walls are neglectedCollided walls are neglected

Fraction of the released energy is localized ata thin surface of the bubble

Fraction of the released energy is localized ata thin surface of the bubble

rB(t)

✏⇤ : fraction of localized at the wall

: released energy density

: bubble radius

✏⇤

Tij(t,x) = · 4⇡3rB(t)

3✏⇤ ·1

4⇡rB(t)2lB· vivj

/ 6076

APPROX’S USUALLY ADOPTED

All energy is assumed to be condensed in a thin surface of the wall.

false

true thin wall

Thin-wall Envelope

lB

Thin-wall & envelope approximations

[Kosowsky, Turner, Watkins, PRD45 (’92)]

Collided walls are neglectedCollided walls are neglected

Fraction of the released energy is localized ata thin surface of the bubble

Fraction of the released energy is localized ata thin surface of the bubble

rB(t)

✏⇤ : fraction of localized at the wall

: released energy density

: bubble radius

✏⇤

for bubble wall region with width lB

Tij(t,x) = · 4⇡3rB(t)

3✏⇤ ·1

4⇡rB(t)2lB· vivj

Numerical simulation has been donewith these (reasonable) approx’s

/ 6077

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

The essence :

Ensemble average

hTij

(tx

,x)Tkl

(ty

,y)iens

GW spectrum is determined by

ll

/ 6078

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

The essence : GW spectrum is determined by

Why ?

hTij

(tx

,x)Tkl

(ty

,y)iens

/ 6079

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

The essence : GW spectrum is determined by

- Why ?

hTij

(tx

,x)Tkl

(ty

,y)iens

Formal solution of EOM : ⇤h ⇠ T →

Note : indices omitted below

Energy density of GWs (~ GW spectrum) :

h ⇠Z t

dt0 Green(t, t0)T (t0)

⇢GW(t) ⇠ h ˙h2iens8⇡G

⇠Z

t

dtx

Zt

dty

cos(k(tx

� ty

))hTT iens

same asmassless scalar field

substitute the formal solution

Note : ensemble averagebecause of the stochasticityof the bubbles

[Caprini et al. ‘08]

/ 6080

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

Estimation of the ensemble average

- Trivial from def. of ensemble average

hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens

hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens = ⌃ Probability for ≠ 0

Value of

in that case×

0

B@

1

CA

0

B@

1

CA

T (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)T (t

x

,x)T (ty

,y)

0

B@

1

CA

0

B@

1

CA

(P) Probability part (V) Value part

/ 6081

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

(tx

,x)

(ty,y)

Estimation of the ensemble average

- Trivial from def. of ensemble average

hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens

hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens = ⌃ Probability for ≠ 0

Value of

in that case×

ll

Probability that bubble walls are passing through(t

x

,x)&(ty

,y)

0

B@

1

CA

0

B@

1

CA

0

B@

1

CA

0

B@

1

CA

T (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)T (t

x

,x)T (ty

,y)

0

B@

1

CA

0

B@

1

CA

(P) Probability part (V) Value part

81

/ 6082

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

(tx

,x)

(ty,y)

nucleation point

Estimation of the ensemble average

- 2 exclusive possibilities for to be nonzero

hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens

T (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)

1. single nucleation point

2. double nucleation points

(tx

,x)

(ty,y)

82

/ 6083

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

(tx

,x)

(ty,y)

nucleation point

Estimation of the ensemble average hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens

1. single nucleation point

2. double nucleation points

(tx

,x)

(ty,y)

- 2 exclusive possibilities for to be nonzeroT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)

83

/ 6084

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

- Single nucleation-point contribution

(V) Value part(P) Probability part

Estimation of the ensemble average hT (tx

,x)T (ty

,y)iens

T (tnucl, tx, ty,⌦nucl)(nx

)i

(nx

)j

(ny

)k

(ny

)l

Summation over nucleation points

×

(tx

,x)

(ty,y)Sum over

nucleation points

hTij

(tx

,x)Tkl

(ty

,y)i(s) =Z

dtnucl P (tx

, ty

, |x� y|)�(tnucl)

/ 6085

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

single

double

Final expression

contains many polynomials, exponentials, and Bessel functions, but just that

�(k/�) ⌘ 3

8⇡G

�2⇢tot

2✏2⇤⌦

GW

(k)

/ 6086

ANALYTIC CALCULATIONHOW IS IT POSSIBLE ?

Result

Peak amplitudedetermined

confirmed / f�1 ? f�2 ?

- Consistent with numerical simulation within factor ~2

⌦GW

(k) ⌘ 1

⇢tot

d⇢GW

d ln k

�(k/�) ⌘ 3

8⇡G

�2⇢tot

2✏2⇤⌦

GW

(k)

/ 6087

FUTURE APPLICATIONS

Inclusion of non-envelope part is possible

- Calculation beyond envelope (More exact GW spectrum from bubble coll.)

- Cross check for sound-wave enhancement of GWs (Recent hot topic)

/ 6088

SOUND-WAVE ENHANCEMENT ?

Some authors argue, with numerical simulations, ...

- In (T) Terminal vel. case, bulk motion of plasma sources GWs

as sound waves, for very very very very long time after bubbles collide

However, correlation <T T> seems to drop after such a long time

I expect our method makes clear whether this enhancement exists

- Because, they’re just saying that localized energy structure sources GWs...

[see e.g. Hindmarsh et al., 1304.2433 / 1504.03291]

top related