problem based learning
Post on 06-Dec-2014
493 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning Activities in the
Undergraduate Classroom
Lauren M. Dahlquist
Origin of Problem-based Learning
• Problem-based learning (PBL) began in 1969 in McMaster University in Ontario, Canada
• One of McMaster’s authorities on PBL states that PBL is any learning environment in which the problem drives the learning, and motivation for this pedagogical method stems from the human desire for problem resolution
Where is PBL now?
• After the founding of PBL, it spread to several continents
• PBL is largely focused in graduate schools, more specifically, in science and pre-health courses
• Research has been conducted on PBL and its effect on material comprehension, student collaboration, and critical thinking skills; little research has been conducted regarding the effectiveness of PBL
Our Role
• We aimed to determine the effectiveness of PBL exercises in – Understanding– Learning retention– Communication skills– Inter-personal relationships
• We examined the effectiveness and usefulness of PBL exercises using pre-health students at the undergraduate level
We hypothesized that students would gain a greater
understanding of material presented in the PBL format.
Students are presented with a pre-test
Students are presented with a problem
Students meet and discuss with peers to solve the presented problem
Students complete a worksheet dissimilar to pre- and post-test
Materials and Methods
After meeting, students take a post-test identical to the pre-test
Students attend didactic lecture session
Surveys are administered
Material retention test administered 30-60 days later
*All post-test scores of PBL were compared with assessments from material taught via traditional lecture
Results of Student Participation by Grade Level
N=91
Results of Student Participation by Major
n=91
Results
• n=91 (98.9% participation) • Pre-test average was 31.9% (n=4 PBLs with 98.9%
participation each PBL) • Post-test average was 90% • We observed that students had a previous
understanding of common topics (i.e. HIV) and as a consequence scored higher on pre-tests (50%) compared with nascent topics (i.e. flow cytometry; 5%)• Post-test scores were consistently high-no
matter the topic.
Figure 1. Student knowledge before (pre-test) and after (post-test) a problem-based learning activity. Students were given the same pre- and post-test as a method of discerning knowledge acquired solely from the PBL activity. Panels A-D are student performance as measured by average percentage on four PBL activities. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. A, PBL on tetanus; B, PBL on Ebola; C, PBL on Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); D, PBL on Flow cytometry. A-D (n=91), E (n=364), and F (n=91)
Pre-test Post-test0
102030405060708090
100
% A
ve
rag
e
p<0.001
Pre-test Post-test0
20
40
60
80
100
% A
ve
rag
e p<0.001
Pre-test Post-test0
102030405060708090
100
% A
ve
rag
e
p<0.001
Pre-test Post-test0
102030405060708090
100
% A
ve
rag
e
p<0.001
C
A B
D
Results of Material Retention• Students answered 78.6% (SD = 0.07) of questions on
information taught using PBL correctly on an assessment 60 days after PBL presentation
• Students answered only 60% of questions on topics presented in a traditional lecture format correctly
n=91
Results of Survey
• 53 students (57.6%) responded to an optional survey positively about PBL use
• Students enjoyed PBL activities as a supplement to didactic lecture and lab
• The active participation of students relied heavily on the active engagement of facilitators
Limitations
• Time required by instructor, including creation of a PBL exercise
• Logistics such as time and space available• Will these results be similar with different
courses? With different student majors or non-majors?
Conclusion
The data generated indicate that PBL exercises are beneficial as a supplement
to traditional lecture in an undergraduate setting of pre-health students
Now, the authors would like to thank…
• The authors thank the Department of Biology at the University of Nebraska at Omaha for supporting this research project.
• Thanks also to all of the student participants in the study. • Thanks to Drs. W. Tapprich, C. Rauter, and J. White for insightful
suggestions for the study and the IRB process (IRB 548-12-EX). • The authors acknowledge the Office of Sponsored Programs at
the University of Nebraska at Omaha for the support with UCRCA funding (L. Dahlquist).
• This background is provided by The Guardian (2011). The graphics are provided by Lyles, J. (2012) and The Extension (2010).
• Thanks to Jamie Knehans, Dr. Abby Stanger, Dakota Ahrendsen, and Josh Larson for accepting publication of their photo.
top related