progress report flash adc probabilistic architecture

Post on 19-Jan-2016

41 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Progress Report Flash ADC Probabilistic Architecture. Yuta Toriyama. yuta@ee.ucla.edu August 10, 2012. The design of a variability-agnostic Flash ADC Using small devices and low supply voltages for a low-power low-area design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Progress ReportFlash ADC Probabilistic Architecture

Yuta Toriyama

yuta@ee.ucla.eduAugust 10, 2012

2

The design of a variability-agnostic Flash ADC Using small devices and low supply voltages for a low-

power low-area design Architecture / calibration techniques to deal with large

amounts of variation Basic concept: Model each comparator as having a static

voltage offset at its input

Low Power Flash ADCs

3

Probabilistic Approach

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

X

1

0

X

X

0

X

Enc

oder

Architectural design:– Allow only certain

comparators to be active– Turn off power to unused

comparators

Requirements:– Threshold values and

indexes of chosen comparators must be monotonically increasing

– Single 1 output to decoder

Logi

c

4

Represent the entire Flash architecture as a network Each comparator (or voltage at which it switches) is a

node

Network Formulation

, ,ij OS i OS je E i j V V

0

12

3

4

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

0

12

3

4

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

5

Any path from lowest to highest comparator in this network guarantees a monotonic sequence of active comparators To find an “optimum” path, assign weights to each edge

Network Formulation

0

12

3

4

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

0

12

3

4

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

6

LP Formulation & Simplex Algorithm

maximize cTx

s.t. Ax = [1 0 0 . . .-1]T

0 ≤ xi ≤ 1, i

x = vector s.t. xi{edge chosen (1), edge not chosen (0)} LP can be solved with Simplex Algorithm

Theoretical average-case complexity = O(|V|*|E|)

123456

arcs

no

de

s

= A

1-10000

100-100

1000-10

10000-1

0001-10

00010-1

010-100

0100-10

01000-1

0010-10

00100-1

00001-1

10-1000

7

Dijkstra’s Algorithm

Solves single-source shortest path problem for networks with non-negative edge weights Simple implementation complexity = O(|V|2)

Balls (vertices) connected by strings (edges) of different lengths (weights)

0

12

43

50

12

3

4

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

8

FPGA Implementations

Dijkstra’s Algorithm: outperforms Simplex in time-to-solution uses much fewer resources in FPGA implementation than

an implementation of the Simplex algorithm

Hardware resourceUtilization

Simplex Algorithm Dijkstra’s Algorithm

Slice Register 10,107 / 58,880 (17%) 3735 / 58,880 ( 6%)

Slice LUT 10,884 / 58,880 (18%) 4406 / 58,880 ( 7%)

DSP48E 62 / 640 ( 9%) 11 / 640 ( 1%)

BlockRAM 62 / 244 (25%) 58 / 244 (23%)

32Mb SRAM (QDR) 1 / 1 (100%) 0 / 1 ( 0%)

Edge Weight Assignment

Calculate the noise power contribution of each arc:Vj

Allows for the inclusion of non-uniform distributions Does not take into account linearity

Ck =

Vi

for all k = {1,2,Numarcs}

di = 4

9

DNL2

1

0

-10 5 10 15 3025 35 4020

INL5

0

-50 5 10 15 3025 35 4020

Code

10

Look-Up Table

Currently the encoder output indicates the index for which comparator was toggled

Instead, we would like the output to indicate what analog voltage trips the comparators

Threshold voltages known from DAC measurements taken for foreground calibration

The

rmom

eter

to O

ne-H

ot, B

ubbl

e C

orre

ctio

n

Vin

Enc

oder

Dout

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

VFS

VFS2N

1

VFS2N

2N-3

VFS2N

2N-2

VFS2N

2N-1

VFS2N

2

N’bxxxx

11

Look-Up Table

Add a look-up table at the output of encoder

Values filled in after calibration

Size of memory required ~1kb for # comparators = 1024 (based on number of active comparators after calibration)

The

rmom

eter

to O

ne-H

ot, B

ubbl

e C

orre

ctio

n

Vin

Enc

oder

Dout

1

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

VFS

Look

-Up

Tab

le

12

New Graph Formulation

Divide threshold voltage axis into L equally-spaced regions

Find one comparator from each region, index of comparators still must be monotonically increasing

Cost = distance from midpoint of each region

0

12

34

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

0

12

34

Comparator Index

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

(V

) 5

13

New Graph Formulation

ENOB, linearity improved

Conclusion

Dijkstra’s Algorithm leads to great improvement in calibration method

LUT-based calibration shows vast improvement in linearity over previous network formulation method

14

top related