progressive damage test - vce

Post on 04-Dec-2021

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

supported by the European Commission

www.vce.at/iris/

Project – S101 Flyover Reibersdorf

Damage

Initial condition after 50 years of service life Progressive Damage Test1 2

4

Effects of KPIs3

www.vce.at

Progressive Damage Test S101 Flyover Reibersdorf

Trend of Eigenfrequencies3a Lifeline3b

Mode Shapes3c Dissipation of induced vibration3d

3

Trend of Eigenfrequencies

3a 3b

Lifeline3c

Mode Shapes

3d

Damping

Effects of KPIs

North SouthTendon cutting

Pier settlement

Demolition4

Progressive Damage Test

Piersettlement

2aTendoncutting

2b

2Initial condition

after 50 yearsof service life

1

2a Pier settlement

2b Tendon cutting

1,5056,0 51,0 46,0 41,0 36,0 31,0 26,0 16,0 11,0 6,021,0

1,25

1,00

0,75

0,50

0,25

0,00

Station [m]

Dam

ping

[%]

North South

8,0056,0 51,0 46,0 41,0 36,0 31,0 26,0 16,0 11,0 6,021,0

7,00

6,00

5,00

4,00

3,00

2,00

1,00

0,00

Station [m]

Dam

ping

[%]

North South

11,0056,0 51,0 46,0 41,0 36,0 31,0 26,0 16,0 11,0 6,021,0

10,009,008,007,006,005,004,003,002,001,000,00

Station [m]

Dam

ping

[%]

North South

Undamaged condition Pier settlement (3 cm) 4th tendon cut through

Evident redistribution of available integrity

56,0 46,0 36,0 26,0 16,0 6,0

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

-0,50

North South

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

-0,50

-1,00

0,00

1,00

-2,00

56,0 46,0 36,0 26,0 16,0 6,0

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

-0,50

North South

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

-0,50

-1,00

0,00

1,00

-2,00

56,0 46,0 36,0 26,0 16,0 6,0

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

-0,50

North South

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

-0,50

-1,00

0,00

1,00

-2,00

Undamaged condition

1st bending mode – main span

1st torsional mode – main span

2nd bending mode – main span

Pier settlement (3 cm) 4th tendon cut through

4.05 Hz

6.30 Hz

9.69 Hz

3.62 Hz

5.39 Hz

8.22 Hz

4.04 Hz

6.18 Hz

9.67 Hz

10

4th tendon partially intersected

20 30 40 50 60 70

Compensation plates inserted

Start of cutting through the pier

End of damage test lowering the pier

Second cut is finished

3rd tendon intersected

2nd tendon intersected

1st tendon intersected

3rd step of lowering

2nd step of lowering

1st step of lowering

-18,1%-16,8%

-11,2%-5,6%

The flyover S101 is a typical prestressed concrete bridge from the early 1960ies. It was decided to replace it as the structure did not fit into the overall traffic and infrastructure concept anymore – the bridge did not meet the current requirements in terms of sufficient carrying capacity.

During the IRIS project VCE (together with the University of Tokyo) took the opportunity of this certain damage test to demonstrate the benefit of monitoring, offering a broadened insight and reduced uncertainties in order to support the decision processes of infrastructure owners.

The major objective of the current progressive damage test was to emphasize refined methods for the analysis of upcoming, slowly progressing damage and its effects on parameters of dynamic response.

age [year]

1960 1970 206020502040 2070203020202010202019901980 2080

1

2

3

4

5

Demolition

To assess the lifetime of a structure several assumptions have to be made. Models and parameters have to be estimated and the risk or a equivalent rating factor has to be calculated.

top related