qualité des soins gestion des risques iatrogènes et système dinformation clinique pascal staccini...
Post on 03-Apr-2015
108 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Qualité des SoinsGestion des Risques Iatrogènes
et Système d’Information Clinique
Pascal StacciniLabSTICs, Faculté de Médecine de Nice
DIIM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nicepascal.staccini@unice.fr
Séminaire de Formation aux Internes de Santé Publique - 19 Novembre 2009 - NICE
Plan de la présentation
Source : http://qualitydigest.com
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. Conclusion
Pro
blè
mes
Evidence Based Management
Faits prouvés mesurant l’impact d’un système d’information clinique
1) sur l’amélioration continue de la qualité des soins
2) sur la réduction de la survenue des événements indésirables
Source : http://blogs.onisep.fr/
Pro
blè
mes
Plan de la présentation
Source : http://qualitydigest.com
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. Conclusion
Pro
blè
mes
Problématiques
P. Degoulet, M. Fieschi. Informatique médicale. 3ème édition, Eds Masson, 1998
P. Degoulet, M. Fieschi. Informatique médicale. 3ème édition, Eds Masson, 1998
Pro
blè
mes
Problématiques
Connaître pour mieuxConnaître pour mieux
SoignerSoigner
GérerGérer
RisquesRisques
QualitéQualité
CoûtCoût
SécuritéSécurité
Conformité
Conformité
EfficienceEfficience
EfficacitéEfficacité
EffectivitéEffectivité
Pro
blè
mes
TraceTrace
IndicateurIndicateur
ModèleModèle
ProcessusProcessus
ProblématiquesConnaître pour mieuxConnaître pour mieux
SoignerSoigner
GérerGérer
RisquesRisques
QualitéQualité
CoûtCoût
SécuritéSécurité
ConformitéConformité
EfficienceEfficience
EfficacitéEfficacité EffectivitéEffectivité
Pro
blè
mes
TraceTrace IndicateurIndicateur
ProcessusProcessus ModèleModèle
Qualité et SI
• Démarches amélioration continue de la qualité
• structurantes sur le plan stratégique, puisqu’elles- précisent les objectifs d’évaluation- définissent les objets de la mesure
• structurantes sur le plan organisationnel puisqu’elles précisent les méthodes de travail et les actions de prévention
• Système d’information
• support de la preuve (trace) et outil de communication et de travail collaboratif entre les acteurs
• support de la mesure (source de données) et des traitements
Pro
blè
mes
Problématiques
• Impliquer les soignants
• Comprendre, recueillir, analyser, interpréter les besoins des utilisateurs
• Impliquer les «organisations»
• Quel lien construire entre information et activité réalisée et à réaliser ?
• Expression des besoins :- 1) Implicites / explicites- 2) Individuels / collectifs
Pro
blè
mes
Les soignants• Considérations comportementales
• Connaissance des bénéfices potentiels
• Ne pas craindre le partage et le changement de pratique
• Considérations méthodologiques
• Savoir faire correspondre modèles de travail et processus cliniques
• Considérations organisationnelles
• Prendre en compte l’organisation du travail (rôles, responsabilités)
Pro
blè
mes
Les établissements
• Conformité réglementaire- Traçabilité, Sécurité- Connaissance des pratiques- Manuel de certification
• Capacités du système d’information à répondre
• Sollicitations en temps réel- Prise en charge du patient- Adaptation au contexte
• Sollicitations en temps différé- Évaluation des pratiques professionnelles
Pro
blè
mes
Qualité... à l’hôpital
• La norme ISO 9004:2000 (SMQ et performance) définit les principes fondateurs constituant des règles et conseils destinés aux organisations (hôpital, pôles, services, PMT, logistique...) :- pour améliorer de façon continue leur performance (conformité, délais)- en se focalisant sur la satisfaction de leurs clients (bénéficiaires au sens large) (patients, familles, professionnels, tutelles)- tout en prenant en compte les besoins des différentes parties prenantes (contrats inter-pôles, EPRD, stratégie du recrutement)
Pro
blè
mes
Point de convergence
Sensibiliser les acteurs de soinsLes aider à identifier, prioriser et formaliser leurs besoins
en termes de données, d’utilité, d’accessibilité et de traitements
Décrire les activitésComprendre les organisations
Evaluer leur performance
Pro
blè
mes
Approche par processus
2 démarches
Pro
blè
mes
Au final
Un processus correctement réorganisé doit présenter :
•un temps de cycle réduit de moitié ;
•un traitement des tâches en parallèle chaque fois que c’est possible ;
•des procédures distinctes en fonction de la complexité des opérations ;
•moins de boucles de retour d’information ;
•plus aucune tâche inutile.
Pro
blè
mes
Effets du BPR
Healthcare continues to face many significant challenges in its quest to provide optimal patient care. Many hospitals have instituted various process improvement methodologies to address these challenges. The outcome of these efforts still produces a large volume of manual tasks that must be addressed by the caregiver. The Chester County Hospital employed a Business Process Management (BPM) engine to automate and manage several of these processes. A BPM engine can perform key tasks and interact with the clinician to decrease the manual requirements of a process. The result is reduced workloads and improved outcomes. The Chester County Hospital has been able to demonstrate significant decreases in hospital acquired MRSA infections and compliance with several CMS core measures. There are multiple items to evaluate before attempting to use a BPM engine. This paper reviews the work at Chester County, its outcomes and the considerations that were important for achieving success.
Hess R. The missing link to success: using a business process management system to automate and manage process improvement. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009; 23(1):27-33.
Hess R. The missing link to success: using a business process management system to automate and manage process improvement. J Healthc Inf Manag 2009; 23(1):27-33.
Pro
blè
mes
from EHR to BPRBACKGROUND: Implementation of health information technology (HIT) has encountered many difficulties and produced mixed outcomes. Yet Trinity Health, a major integrated delivery system, successfully leveraged implementation of a systemwide electronic health record (EHR) to promote process redesign and continuous quality improvement. IMPLEMENTING A SYSTEMWIDE EHR: After several years of planning, two waves of EHR implementation were launched, in 2001 and 2003. One system HIT team collaborated with each hospital team for 18 months before its 24-hour transition to the EHR. During EHR planning, the system HIT team used five principles of redesign of care processes: (1) identify and address safety problems, (2) promote evidence-based practices, (3) reduce practice variations and standardize terminologies and care processes, (4) improve communication and relationships among clinician roles, and (5) augment multiple uses of data in HIT-supported care processes. Patient-centered work flows were developed to design improved patient care processes for different types of patients, such as medical inpatients and emergency outpatients. These admission-to-discharge work flows addressed gaps in quality, safety, and efficiency and helped ensure that the EHR and decision supports reflected crucial interactions among clinicians and with the patient. By the end of 2008, 13 of Trinity Health's 17 major health care organizations ("ministries") made the transformation to using EHRs. DISCUSSION: EHR-supported care redesign requires development of substantial system capacities in clinical informatics, customization and standardization of vendor's products, collaboration and coordination between system and hospital implementation teams, quality training for clinicians and change agents, and significant clinician participation in local preparations.Brokel JM, Harrison MI. Redesigning care processes using an electronic health record: a system's
experience. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Feb;35(2):82-92.
Brokel JM, Harrison MI. Redesigning care processes using an electronic health record: a system's experience. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Feb;35(2):82-92.
Pro
blè
mes
Pro
blè
mes
De l’erreur au risque
« L’erreur est de toute façon inéluctable … il faut tirer les bonnes leçons des accidents du passé » (Reason, 1990)
« Maîtriser le risque, c’est éviter l’accident et quand l’accident survient, en minimiser les conséquences » (JJ Duby, 1996)
Conséquences pratiques en termes de recueil et de traitement d’informations : concept de «médicovigilance»
- comment prévenir et éviter la survenue d’erreurs ?- comment identifier et récupérer les erreurs ?- comment rechercher les défaillances latentes ?
Reason J. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Apr 12;327(1241):475-84.
Duby JJ. Cindynique de la vache folle. Institut Européen de Cindyniques, Lettre n°19, Juin 1996.
Reason J. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Apr 12;327(1241):475-84.
Duby JJ. Cindynique de la vache folle. Institut Européen de Cindyniques, Lettre n°19, Juin 1996.
Pro
blè
mes
Prévenir les erreurs
• réduction du recours à la mémoire de court terme :
• aides-mémoire, listes de contrôle, informatisation des tâches répétitives
• utilisation de détrompeurs :
• « watch-dogs » qui guident les opérateurs et ne leur permettent pas d ’effectuer une action sans que les conditions de sécurité de base soient effectives
• amélioration de l’accès à l’information pour optimiser la prise de décision
Pro
blè
mes
Prévenir les erreurs
• standardisation de l’activité sur la base de processus évalués comme les plus fiables :
• l’existence de règles claires et connues des opérateurs est de première importance dans un contexte de surcharge de travail
• pédagogie de la sécurité :
• expliquer le pourquoi de la rationalité des procédures et analyser les facteurs facilitant la compliance aux procédures et à la déclaration d’incident
Pro
blè
mes
Identifier et décrire
• s’organiser pour identifier/détecter les erreurs, les décrire- pour les corriger et ainsi éviter les accidents ou en réduire l’impact
• organiser le feed-back vers les déclarants- immédiat, contextualisé- différé, spécifique, agrégé
Pro
blè
mes
Défaillances latentes
Recherche des défaillances latentes par la constitution d’une base d’incidents (base de connaissance) décrivant :- domaine d’activité, processus clinique en cause...- identification et description de l’événement,- contexte de survenue,- gravité, conséquences,- analyse de la causalité,- actions mises en place,- impact des actionsRecherche de profils par la fouille de données et/ou l’application d’algorithmes de proximité
Pro
blè
mes
Situation duale
• Le Système d’Information
• Contribution : actions de correction ou d’amélioration
• intégré aux processus de soins : prévention, aide à la décision
• Support d’un dispositif de gestion des risques
• identification, analyse, traitement, évaluation (modèle HAS*)
(*)Principes méthodologiques pour la gestion des risques en établissement de santé. ANAES 2003
(*)Principes méthodologiques pour la gestion des risques en établissement de santé. ANAES 2003
Pro
blè
mes
Plan de la présentation
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. Conclusion
Source : http://trustedadvisor.com
Pro
fess
ion
nels
•Health
•Evaluation through
•Logical
•Processing
Pro
fess
ion
nels
HELP
DATA wich comes from measurements, becoming INFORMATION by transformation, becoming INTEGRATION by combining and finallyDECISION SUPPORT by adding inference.
Alertes cliniques si valeurs biologiques anormales
Evaluations des interactions :- médicament/médicament ;- médicament/biologie ;- médicament/allergies
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Aide à la décision
Lepage EF, Gardner RM, Laub RM, Jacobson JT. Assessing the effectiveness of a computerized blood order "consultation" system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care.
1991:33-7.
Lepage EF, Gardner RM, Laub RM, Jacobson JT. Assessing the effectiveness of a computerized blood order "consultation" system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care.
1991:33-7.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Aide à la décision
Gardner RM, Golubjatnikov OK, Laub RM, Jacobson JT, Evans RS. Computer-critiqued blood ordering using the HELP system. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):514-28.
Each order is justified at the time it is entered by selecting from a menu of physician-approved criteria. The criteria are linked to supportive data in the data base, i.e., laboratory results and clinical data. The computer verified that 82% of these orders met criteria. Quality Assurance nurses verified the remaining 18%. Of these 18% only one in eight required manual chart review. After computer and Quality Assurance review, only eight (0.24%) of the orders were found to be true exceptions to established criteria. Physicians and nurses have accepted the computerized critiquing system.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Aide à la décision
Fernández Pérez ER, Winters JL, Gajic O. The addition of decision support into computerized physician order entry reduces red blood cell transfusion resource utilization in the intensive care unit. Am J Hematol. 2007 Jul;82(7):631-3.
From the institutional APACHE III database we identified 2,200 patients with anemia, but no active bleeding on admission: 1,100 during a year before and 1,100 during a year after the intervention. The mean number of RBC transfusions per patient decreased from 1.5 +/- 1.9 units to 1.3 +/- 1.8 units after the intervention (P = 0.045). RBC transfusion cost decreased from $616,442 to $556,226 after the intervention. Hospital length of stay and adjusted hospital mortality did not differ before and after protocol implementation. Conclusion: the implementation of an evidenced-based decision support system through a CPOE can decrease RBC transfusion resource utilization in critically ill patients.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Adverse Drug Events
Leape LL, Bates DW, Culien DJ, et al. Systems Analysis of Adverse Drug Events. JAMA 1995;274(1):35-43Leape LL, Bates DW, Culien DJ, et al. Systems Analysis of Adverse Drug Events. JAMA 1995;274(1):35-43
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Adverse Drug Events
REEM :
Réseau
Epidém
iolo
gique d
e
l’Err
eur
Médica
mente
use
REEM :
Réseau
Epidém
iolo
gique d
e
l’Err
eur
Médica
mente
use
Berhneim C, Schmitt E, Dufay E. Iatrogénie médicamenteuse nosocomiale et gestion des risques d’erreur médicamenteuse : à propos de l’analyse des notifications du réseau REEM. Oncologie
2005;7:104-119
Berhneim C, Schmitt E, Dufay E. Iatrogénie médicamenteuse nosocomiale et gestion des risques d’erreur médicamenteuse : à propos de l’analyse des notifications du réseau REEM. Oncologie
2005;7:104-119
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Adverse Drug Events
• Agrawal A. Medication Errors: Prevention Using Information Technology Systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009;67(6):681-6
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Limites
Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A. Role of Computerized Order Entry System in Facilitating Medication Errors. JAMA 2005;293(10):1197-1203
Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A. Role of Computerized Order Entry System in Facilitating Medication Errors. JAMA 2005;293(10):1197-1203
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Limites
Henneman PL, Fisher DL, Henneman EA, Pham TA, Mei YY, Talati R, Nathanson BH, Roche J. Providers do not verify patient identity during computer order entry. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;15(7):641-8
This was a prospective study using simulated scenarios with an eye-tracking device. Medical providers were asked to review 10 charts (scenarios), select the patient from a computer alphabetical list, and order tests. Two scenarios had embedded ID errors compared to the computer (incorrect DOB or misspelled last name), and a third had a potential error (second patient on alphabetical list with same last name). Providers were not aware the focus was patient ID. (...) Two of 25 (8%; 95% CI = 1% to 26%) noted the DOB error; the remaining 23 ordered tests on an incorrect patient. One of 25 (4%, 95% CI = 0% to 20%) noted the last name error; 12 ordered tests on an incorrect patient.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Limites
Bedouch P, Allenet B, Grass A, Labarère J, Brudieu E, Bosson JL, Calop J. Drug-related problems in medical wards with a computerized physician order entry system. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Apr;34(2):187-95.
Results: A total of 29 016 medication orders relating to 8152 patients were analysed, and 2669 DRPs, involving 1564 patients (56% female; mean age 72±6 years), were identified representing 33 DRPs per 100 admissions. The most commonly identified DRPs were non-conformity to guidelines or contra-indication (29.5%), improper administration (19.6%), drug interaction (16.7%) and overdosage (12.8%). Conclusions: Drug-related problems are common even after implementation of CPOE. In this context, routine participation of clinical pharmacists in clinical medical rounds may facilitate identification of DRPs. Pharmacists should be able to enhance patient safety through such involvement.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Singh H, Mani S, Espadas D, Petersen N, Franklin V, Petersen LA. Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):982-9.
Singh H, Mani S, Espadas D, Petersen N, Franklin V, Petersen LA. Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):982-9.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Limites
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H et al. Effets on Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2005;293(10):1223-
1238
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H et al. Effets on Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2005;293(10):1223-
1238
Pro
fess
ion
nels
LimitesKripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41. Review.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Education and CPOE
Rothschild JM, McGurk S, Honour M, Lu L, McClendon AA, Srivastava P, Churchill WH, Kaufman RM, Avorn J, Cook EF, Bates DW.Assessment of education and computerized decision support interventions for improving transfusion practice. Transfusion. 2007
Feb;47(2):228-39.
Rothschild JM, McGurk S, Honour M, Lu L, McClendon AA, Srivastava P, Churchill WH, Kaufman RM, Avorn J, Cook EF, Bates DW.Assessment of education and computerized decision support interventions for improving transfusion practice. Transfusion. 2007
Feb;47(2):228-39.
Education and computerized DS both decreased the percentage of inappropriate transfusions, although the
residual amount of inappropriate transfusions remained high.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Failure analysis and CPOE
Kim GR, Chen AR, Arceci RJ, Mitchell SH, Kokoszka KM, Daniel D, Lehmann CU. Error reduction in pediatric chemotherapy: computerized order entry and failure modes and effects analysis. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med. 2006 May;160(5):495-8.
Kim GR, Chen AR, Arceci RJ, Mitchell SH, Kokoszka KM, Daniel D, Lehmann CU. Error reduction in pediatric chemotherapy: computerized order entry and failure modes and effects analysis. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med. 2006 May;160(5):495-8.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Process redesign and CPOE
Schnipper JL, Hamann C, Ndumele CD, Liang CL, Carty MG, Karson AS, Bhan I, Coley CM, Poon E, Turchin A, Labonville SA, Diedrichsen EK, Lipsitz S, Broverman CA, McCarthy P, Gandhi TK. Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application a
nd process redesign on potential adverse drug events: a cluster-randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 27;169(8):771-80.
Schnipper JL, Hamann C, Ndumele CD, Liang CL, Carty MG, Karson AS, Bhan I, Coley CM, Poon E, Turchin A, Labonville SA, Diedrichsen EK, Lipsitz S, Broverman CA, McCarthy P, Gandhi TK. Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application a
nd process redesign on potential adverse drug events: a cluster-randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 27;169(8):771-80.
Pro
fess
ion
nels
Plan de la présentation
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. Conclusion
Source : http://carpefactum.typepad.com
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Identification
Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Bass SB, Menlove RL, Gardner RM, Burke JP. Development of a computerized adverse drug event monitor. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:23-7.
The computerized system identified 401 ADEs during the first year of use compared to 9 by voluntary reporting methods during the previous year (p less than 0.001)
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Identification
Evans RS, Burke JP, Classen DC, Gardner RM, Menlove RL, Goodrich KM, Stevens LE, Pestotnik SL. Computerized identification of patients at high risk for hospital-acquired infection. Am J Infect Control. 1992 Feb;20(1):4-10.
Recently, we used the HELP system to employ statistical methods to automatically identify high-risk patients. Patient data from more than 6000 patients were used to develop a high-risk equation. Stepwise logistic regression identified 10 risk factors for nosocomial infection. The HELP system now uses this logistic-regression equation to monitor and determine the risk status for all hospitalized patients each day. The computer notifies infection control practitioners each morning of patients who are newly classified as being at high risk. Of 605 hospital-acquired infections during a 6-month period, 472 (78%) occurred in high-risk patients, and 380 (63%) were predicted before the onset of infection. Computerized regression equations to identify patients at risk of having hospital-acquired infections can help focus prevention efforts.
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Identification
Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP, Battles JB. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005;14:221-6.
Results: Over 18 months we monitored 36 653 hospitalized patients. There were 731 verified ADEs identified in 648 patients, 701 ADEs were characterized as moderate or severe, and 664 were classified as type A reactions. During this same period only nine ADEs were identified using traditional detection methods. Physicians, pharmacists, and nurses voluntarily reported 92 of the 731 ADEs detected using this automated system. (...) The most common drug classes involved were analgesics, anti-infectives, and cardiovascular agents. Conclusion: We believe that screening for ADEs with a computerized hospital information system offers a potential method for improving the detection and characterization of these events in hospital patients.
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Identification
Bedouch P, Allenet B, Grass A, Labarère J, Brudieu E, Bosson JL, Calop J. Drug-related problems in medical wards with a computerized physician order entry system. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Apr;34(2):187-95.
Results: A total of 29 016 medication orders relating to 8152 patients were analysed, and 2669 DRPs, involving 1564 patients (56% female; mean age 72±6 years), were identified representing 33 DRPs per 100 admissions. The most commonly identified DRPs were non-conformity to guidelines or contra-indication (29.5%), improper administration (19.6%), drug interaction (16.7%) and overdosage (12.8%). Conclusions: Drug-related problems are common even after implementation of CPOE. In this context, routine participation of clinical pharmacists in clinical medical rounds may facilitate identification of DRPs. Pharmacists should be able to enhance patient safety through such involvement.
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Identification
Bilimoria KY, Kmiecik TE, DaRosa DA, Halverson A, Eskandari MK, Bell RH Jr, Soper NJ, Wayne JD. Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients.
Arch Surg. 2009 Apr;144(4):305-11
Bilimoria KY, Kmiecik TE, DaRosa DA, Halverson A, Eskandari MK, Bell RH Jr, Soper NJ, Wayne JD. Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients.
Arch Surg. 2009 Apr;144(4):305-11
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Feedback
Evans SM, Berry JG, Smith BJ, Esterman A, Selin P, O’Shaughnessy J, DeWit M. Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006;15:39-
43
Evans SM, Berry JG, Smith BJ, Esterman A, Selin P, O’Shaughnessy J, DeWit M. Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2006;15:39-
43
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Feedback
Benn J, Koutantji M, Wallace L, Spurgeon P, Rejman M, Healey A, Vincent C. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care.
2009 Feb;18(1):11-21
Benn J, Koutantji M, Wallace L, Spurgeon P, Rejman M, Healey A, Vincent C. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care.
2009 Feb;18(1):11-21
Ris
ks m
an
ag
er
Plan de la présentation
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. ConclusionSource : http://traitportrait.blogspot.com/2008/11/carte-didentit-prime.html
Dis
posi
tifs
Haug PJ, Rocha BH, Evans RS. Decision support in medicine: lessons from the HELP system. Int J Med Inform. 2003 Mar;69(2-3):273-84.
Haug PJ, Rocha BH, Evans RS. Decision support in medicine: lessons from the HELP system. Int J Med Inform. 2003 Mar;69(2-3):273-84.
Dis
posi
tifs
Runciman WB, Williamson JAH, Deakin A, Benveniste KA, Bannon K, Hibbert PD. An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005;15:i82-
i90
Runciman WB, Williamson JAH, Deakin A, Benveniste KA, Bannon K, Hibbert PD. An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2005;15:i82-
i90
Dis
posi
tifs
• Permettre le signalement de tout type d’événement indésirable
• Améliorer la mise en œuvre de mesures correctives immédiates
• Optimiser la circulation de l’information d’alerte
• Effectuer l’analyse de événements indésirables
• Permettre une interrogation décentralisée de la base de données
• Optimiser la communication entre acteurs de soins
• Optimiser la gestion documentaire
• Optimiser l’auto-évaluation des professionnels
• Mettre à disposition en externe les protocoles de pratique
• Donner une information « grand public »
Dis
posi
tifs
Identitovigilance
Annuaireidentités
Algorithmesde détection
Workflowdes suspicions
Correctiondocumentée
en temps différé
Correction en temps réel
Base de connaissance
Actionsciblées
Dis
posi
tifs
Fusion des dossiers
Dis
posi
tifs
Pharmacovigilance
• Constitution d’une base de connaissance locale
• non seulement sur l’événement
• mais surtout sur la réponse fournie, généralement basée
• sur l’historique local (réponse quasi-immédiate)
• sur une recherche bibliographique (nouvelle ou d’actualisation)
• sur les conclusions du staff de réponse
Dis
posi
tifs
Marquage a minima
• sous forme de codes diagnostics au sein des RUM du PMSI
• imprécision des codes, certes,
• MAIS l’idée est d’identifier des types de séjours à risque pour les surveiller en leur appliquant les principes de la MSP
Dis
posi
tifs
Plan de la présentation
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. Conclusion
Source : http://noticebored.com
Pers
pect
ives
CPOE with DS
Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Clemmer TP, Weaver LK, Orme JF Jr, Lloyd JF, Burke JP. A Computer-assisted Management Program for Antibiotics and Other Antiinfective Agents. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan
22;338(4):232-8
Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Clemmer TP, Weaver LK, Orme JF Jr, Lloyd JF, Burke JP. A Computer-assisted Management Program for Antibiotics and Other Antiinfective Agents. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan
22;338(4):232-8
Pers
pect
ives
Evaluation
Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Rowe NR. Clinical Information Technologies and Inpatient Outcomes. A Multiple Hospital Study. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(2):108-114
Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Rowe NR. Clinical Information Technologies and Inpatient Outcomes. A Multiple Hospital Study. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(2):108-114
Péd
ag
og
ie
Pers
pect
ives
Pers
pect
ives
Lindenauer PK, Ling D, Pekow PS, Crawford A, Naglieri-Prescod D, Hoople N, Fitzgerald J, Benjamin EM. Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry. J Hosp Med. 2006 Jul;1(4):221-30.
Lindenauer PK, Ling D, Pekow PS, Crawford A, Naglieri-Prescod D, Hoople N, Fitzgerald J, Benjamin EM. Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry. J Hosp Med. 2006 Jul;1(4):221-30.
Pers
pect
ives
Perspectives
van Wyk JT, van Wijk MA, Sturkenboom MC, et al. Electronic alerts versus on-demand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment:
a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2008;117:371-8.
van Wyk JT, van Wijk MA, Sturkenboom MC, et al. Electronic alerts versus on-demand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment:
a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2008;117:371-8.
38 pratiques, 77 MG hollandais, 87 886 patients
Pers
pect
ives
Perspectives
Shojania KG, Levinson W. Clinicians in quality improvement: a new career pathway in academic medicine.
JAMA. 2009 Feb 18;301(7):766-8.
Shojania KG, Levinson W. Clinicians in quality improvement: a new career pathway in academic medicine.
JAMA. 2009 Feb 18;301(7):766-8.
Pers
pect
ives
Plan de la présentation
1. Problèmes et concepts
2. Professionnels et SI
3. Risk managers et SI
4. Dispositifs
5. Perspectives
6. ConclusionSource : http://www.efficience-ergonomie.com
Con
clu
sion
• Evidence-based management is not widely used by health care managers for the following reasons:
• First, the business case for return on investment has not yet been reliably made.
• Second, widespread use would shift power away from senior toward junior managers.
• Third, hospital boards do not regularly review the quality of the managerial decision-making process.
Richard d’Aquila, Daid Fine. “The Practice of Evidence-Based Management”. Health Administration Press, 2008Richard d’Aquila, Daid Fine. “The Practice of Evidence-
Based Management”. Health Administration Press, 2008
Con
clu
sion
Con
clu
sion
• La qualité c’est l’évaluation de l’atteinte d’objectifs
• Dans le domaine de la qualité comme ailleurs, c’est l’analyse des organisations qui prime
• Les technologies ne sont rien sans les usages
• Analyser la plus-value d’une technologie c’est d’abord évaluer la performance d’une organisation (risques)
• Les preuves existent : les comportements doivent évoluer et les décisions doivent être évaluées ; c’est là que résident encore les difficultés
Conclusion
Con
clu
sion
Qualité, Gestiondes Risques et Systèmes
d'Information Hospitaliers
Con
clu
sion
top related