real business cycles supply side economics. the real economy neoclassical (supply side) economics...

Real Business Cycles

Supply Side Economics

The Real Economy

• Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random disturbances to productivity.

The Real Economy

• Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random disturbances to productivity.

• The initial impact takes place in labor markets (employment/output)

The Real Economy

• Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random disturbances to productivity.

• The initial impact takes place in labor markets (employment/output)

• Capital markets determine the impact on future labor markets (Investment today affects the capital stock in the future)

Example: A negative supply shock

• Consider an unanticipated rise in oil prices (permanent enough to impact capital investment).

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A negative supply shock

• Consider an unanticipated rise in oil prices (permanent enough to impact capital investment).

• This drop in productivity lowers labor demand resulting in lower wages, lower employment, and lower output 0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A negative supply shock

• Now, moving to capital markets, the drop in productivity ( from lower employment as well as high oil prices) lowers investment demand

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A negative supply shock

• Now, moving to capital markets, the drop in productivity ( from lower employment as well as high oil prices) lowers investment demand

• Lower investment demand causes interest rates, investment, and savings to fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

• Capital goods are constantly wearing out (depreciation). Therefore, positive investment is needed to maintain the current capital stock.

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

• Capital goods are constantly wearing out (depreciation). Therefore, positive investment is needed to maintain the current capital stock.

• The capital stock evolves according to

K (Future) = (1-dep)*K + I

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

• Capital goods are constantly wearing out (depreciation). Therefore, positive investment is needed to maintain the current capital stock.

• The capital stock evolves according to

K (Future) = (1-dep)*K + I

• A large enough drop in current investment causes the capital stock to shrink.

Example: A negative supply shock

• With a lower capital stock, labor productivity drops (capital and labor are complements) causing another drop in labor demand

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A negative supply shock

• With a lower capital stock, labor productivity drops (capital and labor are complements) causing another drop in labor demand

• Therefore, wages, employment, and output continue to fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A negative supply shock

• Lower employment causes another drop in capital investment (not as big as the previous decline – the capital stock is lower than it was before)

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A negative supply shock

• Lower employment causes another drop in capital investment (not as big as the previous decline – the capital stock is lower than it was before)

• Interest rates and investment continue to fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Example: A Negative supply shock

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

0

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0 1st Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

0 1st Qtr 2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th QtrEmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

8thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

8thQtr

9thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Example: A negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

8thQtr

9thQtr

10thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

The Recession of 2001

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4/1/

99

8/1/

99

12/1

/99

4/1/

00

8/1/

00

12/1

/00

4/1/

01

8/1/

01

12/1

/01

4/1/

02

8/1/

02

12/1

/02

GDPConsumptionProductivity

The Recession of 2001

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Jan-

99

May

-99

Sep-

99

Jan-

00

May

-00

Sep-

00

Jan-

01

May

-01

Sep-

01

Jan-

02

May

-02

Sep-

02

Jan-

03

Investment

The Recession of 2001

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1/1/

99

5/1/

99

9/1/

99

1/1/

00

5/1/

00

9/1/

00

1/1/

01

5/1/

01

9/1/

01

1/1/

02

5/1/

02

9/1/

02

1/1/

03

5/1/

03

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

EmploymentInterest

What caused the 2001 recession?

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

• A sharp rise in oil prices (oil prices doubled in late 1999)

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

• A sharp rise in oil prices (oil prices doubled in late 1999)

• Enron/Accounting scandals

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

• A sharp rise in oil prices (oil prices doubled in late 1999)

• Enron/Accounting scandals

• Terrorism/SARS