red hat storage day dallas - defiance of the appliance

Post on 22-Jan-2018

195 Views

Category:

Technology

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

DEFIANCE OF THE APPLIANCE

Irshad RaihanRed Hat

February 2017

2

RIP TRADITIONAL ENTERPRISE STORAGE

3

CHALLENGES WITH TRADITIONAL STORAGE

COST CONSOLIDATION SECURITY

• Acquisition

• Maintenance

• Lock in

• Privacy

• Data Integrity

• Compliance

• Unstructured Data

• Multiple Silos

• Cloud

THE ROAD TO SOFTWARE DEFINED STORAGE

Development

Model

Application

Architecture

Deployment

& Packaging

Application

InfrastructureStorage

Waterfall

Agile

DevOps

Monolithic

N-tier

Microservices

Virtual Services

Containers

Bare Metal

Hosted

Hybrid

Cloud

Data Center

Scale Out

Software-Defined

Storage

Scale Up

5

RED HAT – A STORAGE VISIONARY

• File, Object, and Block Storage

• Across bare metal, virtual machines, private and

public clouds

• Reference Architectures, Soft bundles, or

appliances

• Container-native storage

• #1 storage for OpenStack

• Choice of industry leading OEM partners

• Thriving open source communities

6

STORAGE DEPLOYMENT

PHYSICAL VIRTUAL PRIVATE CLOUD CONTAINERS PUBLIC CLOUD

7

• Contributions from Intel, SanDisk, CERN, and Yahoo

• Presenting Ceph Days in cities around the world and

quarterly virtual Ceph Developer Summit events

• Over 11M downloads in the last 12 months

• Increased development velocity, authorship, and

discussion has resulted in rapid feature expansion

OPEN ECOSYSTEMS

97 AUTHORS/MO

2,453 COMMITS/MO

260 POSTERS/MO

33 AUTHORS/MO

97 COMMITS/MO

138 POSTERS/MO

8

COMPARING THROUGHPUT AND COSTS AT SCALE

STORAGE PERFORMANCE

SCALABILITYSTORAGE COSTS

SCALABILITY

Number of Storage Nodes Number of Storage Nodes

To

tal

Sto

rag

e C

osts

($)

Read

s/W

rite

s T

hro

ug

hp

ut

(mB

ps

)

Software Defined

Scale out Storage

Traditional

Enterprise NAS

Storage

Traditional

Enterprise NAS

Storage

Software Defined

Scale out Storage

9

TCO COMPARISONFor 1PB Usable Capacity Throughput-optimized Solutions

3 Year TCO

(incl. support)

Throughput

Configuration

• HDD-only media

• Higher CPU-to-media

ratio than archive

configurations

• 2x replication with RHGS

• 8:3 Erasure Coding with

EMC Isilon

X-210 12LFF 12LFF

(small)

X-410 36LFF 36LFF

(medium)

Pricing Sources: EMC Isilon: Gartner Competitive Profiles, as of 2/16/16) & Supermicro: Thinkmate, as of 1/13/16)

10

For large file sequential IO patterns

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4M-Seq-Reads/disk 4M-Seq-Writes/disk (2x Rep)

MB

yte

s /

sec

/ d

isk

Gluster (M) - 2xRep

Gluster (S) - 2xRep

NEAR LINEAR PERF SCALING RHGS SMALL(12LFF) AND MEDIUM (36LFF) NODES

OneFS

Distributed

File System

FreeBSD

Linux

Proprietary Server

Scale up, multiple

storage silos

Additional feature

licenses and support

11

OPEN MATTERS

GlusterFS

Distributed

File System

Red Hat

Enterprise Linux

Choice of x86 Server

Scale out, workload

focused

All in one

subscription

VS.

12

RED HAT GLUSTER STORAGE

Data Services

Erasure Coding

Tiering

Bit-Rot Detection

Snapshots

Quotas

Geo Replication

Protocols

Active/Active NFSv4

SMB3 (protocol negotiation, in-flight

encryption, server-side copy)

Management

Device Management

Dashboard

Monitoring

Command and Control

Security & Data Integrity

SSL based in-flight encryption

At-rest encryption using dm-crypt

SELinux Enforcing Mode

Self Healing

Half the price for comparable features & greater flexibility

13

THE SOFTWARE DEFINED STORAGE LITMUS TEST

HARDWARE

INNOVATION

• Can I repurpose existing industry-standard servers as storage servers rather than buy new

hardware?

• Can I run my storage clusters on a heterogeneous mix of server brands?

OPERATING

EXPENSES

• Can innovations in storage controller software be delivered independently from hardware

upgrades?

• Am I limited by my vendor’s ability to validate new storage features and hardware advances?

• Can I grow my storage cluster in small increments (e.g., by a few servers at a time) or am I

limited to the increments defined by the vendor (e.g., quarter, half or full rack)?

14

SEE FOR YOURSELF

red.ht/glustertestdrive

red.ht/cephtestdriveredhat.com/summit

The Future of Enterprise Storage

redhat.com/storage

• Success Stories

• Blogs

• Use Cases

• Reference Architectures

• Free sign up

• Demo, learn, evaluate

• Hands-on lab experience

• Step by step guided tour

• Technical Sessions

• 1 : 1 Briefings

• Customer Successes

• Live Demos

top related