regiotram utrecht operational modelling ...january 2016 regiotram utrecht - operational modelling....
Post on 03-Aug-2021
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT OPERATIONAL MODELLING FINAL REPORT BASE MODEL JANUARY 2016
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
LIST OF CONTENT
Content slide, two columns with image
Conclusion
Results Scenario C2
Results Scenario C1
Run times
Vehicles
Schematic open track infrastructure diagrams
Input data
Scenarios
Previous model work
Methodology
Process
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
PROCESS
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
OPERATIONAL MODELLING PROCESS
Content slide
Prior consultant: Analysis from operational modelling
Modifications of operational requirements
Built-up of a complete new OpenTrack model
Base scenarios (C1 and C2) to be modelled
Analysis of operational key numbers
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
METHODOLOGY
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
METHODOLOGY
• Collection and documentation of all infrastructure changes (against the November 2013 version) for the operational model (based on Project Step 1 – Modification Speed Profile)
• Implementing the line infrastructure in a new OpenTrack model (no update)
• Building of the two operational schemes (Phase C1 and C2) for the through running services on the SUNIJ- and Uithof line
• Calculation of operational numbers
• run times
• number of vehicles
• system efficiency
• turnaround times
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
PREVIOUS MODEL WORK
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
PREVIOUS MODEL WORK
• The following BRU reports form the main input for this updated model work
• Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 1_report, February 2013
• Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part A_B_v1, November 2013
• Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part C 2020_v1, November 2013
• They are referred to in this report as “Prior Ops study”
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
MODIFICATIONS OF BASE DATA COMPARED TO PRIOR OPS STUDY
• Alignment of Uithof lijn
• Modifications on SUNIJ-Lijn
• Speed profile considering modifications agreed in Project Step 1
• Uithof lijn (no modifications)
• SUNIJ lijn (significant modifications on Ijsselstein branch and section Nieuwegein Stadscentrum – Utrecht Centraal) Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS TAKEN OVER FROM PREVIOUS MODEL
• Regulation at Utrecht OVT to assure needed punctuality
• Influence of bus traffic at Utrecht OVT
• Critical: Turnaround in Utrecht OVT to permit short shuttle between Uithof and Utrecht
• Turn around time:
• OVT minimum 175 s plus 85 s for passenger exchange
• P+R De Uithof max. 300 s Content slide, two columns with image Prior
track layout
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
TURNAROUND TIMES
• Turnaround time:
• Technical minimum turnaround
• Dwell time for boarding and alighting
• Buffer time
• Minimum planned turnaround time
• 4 min minimum turnaround time including
• Sum of turnaround times at both ends of
line shall be between 10% and 20% of
overall runtime
• Technical minimum turnaround time:
• Vehicle shut down: 20 sec
• Driver changing cab: about 2 min
• Vehicle ramp up: 20 s
• Total: 3 min
• Dwell time for boarding and alighting
• Distribution depending on traffic demand
and platform access
• Can be allowed while driver is changing
the cab (at least in case of delay)
• Additional buffer time
• Remaining time to start at planned
departure time
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
DUTY ROASTER EFFICIENCY
• Efficiency
• Definition: Runtime / (Runtimes + turnaround times)
• Shall ideally be between 80% and 90%
• 80 % or lower
• In case the value is below 80 % the (non-productive) turn-around time is compared to the
(productive) run time too high
• The number of vehicles will increase leading to finally higher investment and higher operational
cost
• The system robustness on the other hand is high as delays can be quickly re-covered
• 90 % or higher
• In case the value is 90 % or higher the (non-productive) turn-around time is compared to the
(productive) run time too low
• The system robustness drops as delays cannot be re-covered anymore
• On the other hand the number of vehicles will decrease leading to lower investment and
eventually lower operational cost
• But the system is not reliable anymore and the attractiveness for passengers goes down
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
DUTY ROSTER OF PRIOR OPS STUDY
• Operational Scenario C
• Nieuwegein Zuid – P+R De Uithof: Headway 12 min
• Ijsselstein Zuid – P+R De Uithof: Headway 12 min
• OVT – P+R De Uithof: Headway 2x 12 min
• Duty roster as follows:
Content slide, two columns with image Ijsselstein Zuid
Nieuwegein Zuid
OVT P+R
De Uithof
Nieuwegein
Stadscentrum
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
KEY NUMBERS FROM PRIOR OPS STUDY
Nieuwegein Ijsselstein
Runtime PRU–NWG/ISS (including dwell times) 47 min 54 min 30 sec
Runtime ISS/NWG – PRU (including dwell times) 47 min 56 min
Turnaround time 11-12 min 7-8 min
Runtime Uithof Line To PRU 17 min 20 sec To OVT 16 min 20 sec
Turnaround time P+R Uithof 4-5 min
Turnaround time OVT Uithof Line 6 min
Duty roster 156 min 168 min
Duty roster performance 83% 87%
Number of vehicles (without reserve) 13*2 units 14*2 units
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
SCENARIOS
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
2 OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS TO BE MODELLED
• Scenarios based on prior scenario C (see report Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part C 2020_v1, November 2013)
• Morning peak hour to be modelled (6:00 - 8:00) to generate all operational numbers (e.g. run times, number of vehicles, system efficiency, turnaround times)
• Scenario C1 with reduced headway (not modelled before):
• 8 veh/h/direction on the SUNIJ line (7,5 min headway OVT – Nieuwegein Stadscentrum, 15 min on branches to Ijsselstein and Nieuwegein),
• 16 veh/h/direction on the Uithof line (3,75 min headway).
• Scenario C2 (as modelled before – Scenario C):
• 10 veh/h/direction on the SUNIJ line (6 min headway OVT – Nieuwegein Stadscentrum, 12 min on branches to Ijsselstein and Nieuwegein),
• 20 veh/h/direction on the Uithof line (3 min headway).
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SCENARIO C1
• Nieuwegein Zuid – P+R De Uithof: Headway 15 min
• Ijsselstein Zuid – P+R De Uithof: Headway 15 min
• OVT – P+R De Uithof: Headway 2x 15 min
Content slide, two columns with image Ijsselstein Zuid
Nieuwegein Zuid
OVT P+R
De Uithof 4/h
4/h
8/h 16/h
Nieuwegein
Stadscentrum
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SCENARIO C2
• Nieuwegein Zuid – P+R De Uithof: Headway 12 min
• Ijsselstein Zuid – P+R De Uithof: Headway 12 min
• OVT – P+R De Uithof: Headway 2x 12 min
Content slide, two columns with image Ijsselstein Zuid
Nieuwegein Zuid
OVT P+R
De Uithof 5/h
5/h
10/h 20/h
Nieuwegein
Stadscentrum
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
INPUT DATA
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
BUILT-UP OF A NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL
• Infrastructure:
• Uithof-Lijn: Alignment plans with few changes compared to elder planning (02.09.2014)
• SUNIJ-Lijn: Alignment plans (23.12.2011)
• Operation:
• Consideration of modified speed profiles (09.12.2014)
• Dwell times as in prior Ops study
• No negative effects of bus traffic at OVT and University considered
• Rolling stock: Implementation of new CAF vehicles
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW TRACK LAYOUT AT UTRECHT OVT
New
track layout
• Diamond crossover allows an efficient operation at the OVT intermediate terminus
• Turnaround of short line from P&R Uithof to OVT
• No left side operation for departing courses to P&R Uithof necessary
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: SPEED MODIFICATION
Nieuwegein Zuid – Stadscentrum:
No change of maximum speed because of local restrictions
No change of runtime in this section
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: SPEED MODIFICATION
Stadscentrum – Utrecht OVT C:
No significant effect on runtime
No change of runtime
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SPEED COMPARISON
Stadscentrum – Ijsselstein Zuid
Significant modifications of maximum speed
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL: INPUT DATA (1/3)
Content slide, two columns with image
Alignment Uithof line Description Date Source
01_JBP-OVT.pdf Situatie Tracédeel Doorkoppeling 16.12.2011 ITC
Ontwerpverantwoording VO+ incl. bijllagen I-XIV and
additional documents Ontwerpverantwoording 20.12.2011 Movares
RVT Schets Uithoflijn.pdf Railverkeerstechnische Shets De Uithof Lijn 12.10.2012 Movares
DSM UHL DO 001 003_ACAD_3D.dwg Alignment Uithofline Nov 12
Uithoflijn_overview.pdf Nov 12
WP119-BNS-200-0##_C30-FKU-AU-1300###_v5.0.pdf
Contracttekening Traminfrastructuur
Situatie fietspad Cambridgelaan
De Uithof 02.09.2014 Movares
Alignment SUNIJ line Description Date Source
07120030-1.pdf, 07120030-2.pdf PVS-meting SUNIJ 23.02.2009 ProRail
C30-HBE-AU-110020#_V1.0.pdf
SUNIJ-Lijn: Grootschalige Verwanging
Infrastructuur
Definitief Ontwerp Baan en spoor 23.12.2011 Movares
C30-FKU-AU-1100326_v3.0.dwg
Jaarbeursplein
Overzichtstekening
Sporenplan Tijdelijke eindhalte SUNIJ-lijn
Definitief Ontwerp 02.02.2012 ITC
330_BN~1.PDF - 330_BN~4.PDF, …
Vraagsspecificatie Tijdelijke
Eindhalte Jaarbeursplein 28.03.2012 ITC
000201380 ORblad #.pdf OR-Bladen 19.09.2012 Bestuur Regio Utrecht
OBE blad 0x #,### - #,### - ... #.pdf OBE-Blads 27.11.2014 Bestuur Regio Utrecht
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL: INPUT DATA (2/3)
Content slide, two columns with image
Speed profile SUNIJ line Description Date Source
snelheden SUNIJ versie 3JV.xls Baanvak snelheid SUNIJ Feb 13 Bestuur Regio Utrecht
SUNIJ lijn snelheden.xlsx Baanvak snelheid SUNIJ Dez 14 Bestuur Regio Utrecht
Operation SUNIJ + Uithofline Description Date Source
Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 1_report.pdf
OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF
SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES
Report Phase 1 Feb 13 TTK
1311_Utrecht_SUNIJ_PHAB_vehicles.pdf
OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF
SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES
Phase A and B - working day (2016-2020)
Number of rolling stock required 26.11.2013 TTK
Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part A_B_v1.pdf
OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF
SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES
Report Project-phase 2
Phases A and B (Network from 2016/2018 on) 26.11.2013 TTK
Utrecht_dynamic_modelling_phase 2_part C
2020_v1.pdf
OPERATIONAL DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF
SNELTRAM SUNIJ AND UITHOF LINES
Report Project-phase 2
Phase C (Network from 2020 on) 26.11.2013 TTK
E82-RWÖ-KA-1400065 versie 1.0.pdf Dynamische simulatie stationsgebied Utrecht 07.03.2014 Movares
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK-MODEL: INPUT DATA (3/3)
Content slide, two columns with image
Vehicles SUNIJ + Uithofline Description Date Source
Sneltram vehicles
010149002 sunij maatvoering schoon.pdf Algemeen Plan Sneltram 25.03.1981 NS
Beschrijving Treinstellen Sunij Def.pdf Beschrivingen Treinstellen 1989 NS
CAF vehicles
Q.00.187.00.000-
A0_T_CJTO_GENERAL_UNIDAD_5_MODULOS__-
UTRECHT-_H1.pdf Overzicht Basis Variant Tramvoertuig 17.03.2014 CAF
Q.00.187.00.001-
A0_T_CJTO_GENERAL_UNIDAD_7_MODULOS__-
UTRECHT-_H1.pdf Overzicht Lange Variant Tramvoertuig 17.03.2014 CAF
3-5.2 Tramontwerp.pdf TRAMONTWERP 15.10.2014 CAF
Bijlage 3-6.6.1-TECHNISCHE BESCHRIJVING
TRACTIEAPPARATUUR.pdf
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION TRACTION
EQUIPMENT FOR UTRECHT TRAM 15.10.2014 CAF
Gewichten.pdf Gewichten standaard/lange tramstel 03.03.2015 CAF
Overzichtstekening Standaard Tram (33m).pdf Overzichtstekening (Draft) 03.03.2015 CAF
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
SCHEMATIC OPEN TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE DIAGRAMS
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: IJSSELSTEIN ZUID - DOORSLAG
Content slide, two columns with image
Ijsselstein Zuid
To Nieuwegein
Stadscentrum
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: ST. ANTONIUS ZIEKEHUIS / NIEUWEGEIN ZUID – NIEUWEGEIN STADSCENTRUM
Content slide, two columns with image
Nieuwegein Zuid
Nieuwegein
Stadscentrum
From
Ijsselstein
Zuid
To
Wijkersloot
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: WIJKERSLOOT - ZUILENSTEIN
Content slide, two columns with image
From
Nieuwegein
Stadscentrum
To
Jaarbeurs-
plein
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW OPENTRACK MODEL: GRAADT VAN ROGGENWEG – VASCO DA GAMALAAN
Content slide, two columns with image
Jarbeursplein
From
Westraven
To
OVT
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
OPENTRACK MODEL: VAARTSCHE RIJN – OVT UTRECHT C
Content slide, two columns with image
Utrecht OVT
From
Jaarbeursplein
To P+R
De Uithof
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
OPENTRACK MODEL: GALGENWAARD – P+R DE UITHOF
Content slide, two columns with image
P+R De Uithof
From
OVT
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
(MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM IJSSELSTEIN ZUID – OVT
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
(MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM SUNIJ LINE NIEUWEGEIN ZUID – P+R DE UITHOF
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
(MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM OVT – IJSSELSTEIN ZUID
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
(MAX) SPEED VS. DISTANCE DIAGRAM SUNIJ LINE P+R DE UITHOF – NIEUWEGEIN ZUID
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
VEHICLES
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
VEHICLE PARAMETERISATION AS IN PRIOR OPS STUDY
32 m single unit 42-43 m single unit
combined to a 75 m double unit
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW CAF VEHICLE PARAMETERISATION
33 m single unit 42-43 m single unit
Content slide, two columns with image
• Traction effort curve:
• EL 4 (4 standees per m2) identical with curve EL 6.67
• Acceleration limited for comfort reasons to 1,2 m/s2
Acceleration
Traction
effort
(Force)
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
NEW CAF VEHICLE PARAMETERISATION
Can be coupled to a double unit (simulated as one vehicle train)
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SHORT AND LONG VEHICLES
• The CAF vehicles tested are 33 m long vehicles.
• In the case extended vehicle would be used, they would need one motorised bogie more.
• From experience the performance would be in this case the same as for the short vehicle.
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
RUN TIMES
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
OPERATIONAL KEY NUMBERS: CALIBRATION RUNTIME
Content slide, two columns with image
• Comparison of runtimes based on vehicle and infrastructure from Prior Ops Study
New OpenTrack
model:
New model with similar
runtimes compared with
Prior Ops Study 2014
with the same vehicles
assumed
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SPEED COMPARISON
Maximum speed adapted
in the model
Simulation results:
No significant change
of runtime
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
VEHICLE EFFECTS ON RUNTIME
Content slide, two columns with image
• Comparison of undisturbed runtimes (to compare vehicle influence):
• Single line one-directional simulation
• Remark: Run times without operational effects are shorter than system runtimes
• CAF vehicle shows shorter runtimes than prior reference vehicle of about 1 min between P&R De Uithof and Ijsselstein and Nieuwegein respectively
From To
Reference
vehicle CAF vehicle Difference
P+R De Uithof Ijsselstein Zuid 00:52:45 00:51:32 00:01:13
Ijsselstein Zuid P+R De Uithof 00:54:07 00:53:05 00:01:03
From To
Reference
vehicle CAF vehicle Difference
P+R De Uithof Nieuwegein Zuid 00:47:17 00:45:55 00:01:22
Nieuwegein Zuid P+R De Uithof 00:47:22 00:46:17 00:01:05
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
CHARACTERISTIC RUNTIMES ALONG SPECIFIC SECTIONS
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
RESULTS SCENARIO C2
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SCENARIO C2 (12 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL IJSSELSTEIN ZUID – P+R DE UITHOF
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SCENARIO C2 (12 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL NIEUWEGEIN ZUID – P+R DE UITHOF
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
OVT PLATFORM OCCUPANCY
• Tracks 1 & 2 respectively 3 & 4 use the same platform between the two tracks. From the safety point of view considering the amount of passengers at one point of time on a platform there boarding and alighting at the same time shall be avoided.
• Scenario C1:
• Tracks 1 & 2: No occupancy at the same time
• Arrival at track 3 just after departure at track 4
• Scenario C2:
• Arrival and departure at track 2 while track 1 is not used
• Arrival and departure at track 3 while track 4 is not used
OVT Platform occupancy
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
KEY NUMBERS NEW AND ADAPTED MODEL – SCENARIO C2 (MODIFIED OVT LAYOUT, SPEED MODIFICATIONS , CAF VEHICLE) HEADWAY 12 / 6 / 3 MIN
Nieuwegein Ijsselstein
Runtime PRU–NWG/ISS (including dwell times) 46,5 min 54 min
Runtime ISS/NWG – PRU (including dwell times) 47 min 54 min
Turnaround time 13,5 min 11 min
Runtime Uithof Line To PRU 17 min To OVT 16 min
Turnaround time P+R Uithof 5 min
Turnaround time OVT Uithof Line 6 min
Duty roster 156 min 168 min
Duty roster performance 80% 83%
Number of vehicles (without reserve) 13*2 units 14*2 units
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
RISK ANALYSIS SCENARIO C2
• Ramboll/MMD have calculated 54 vehicles without reserve for the scenario C2
• With sufficient turnaround times a reliable operation can be assured.
• This implies the avoiding the change of line (Ijsselstein/Nieuwegein) at the turnaround in P+R De Uithof
• A further optimisation would not be recommended regarding the risk of longer dwell times as a result of different door opening and closing times of the CAF vehicles.
• Precondition for this operational concept would be:
• Using a short turnaround at OVT and
• The change of line at P+R De Uithof for the intermediate short line service P+R – OVT (combination of Nieuwegein and Ijsselstein line).
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
RESULTS SCENARIO C1
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SCENARIO C1 (15 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL IJSSELSTEIN ZUID – P+R DE UITHOF
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
SCENARIO C1 (15 MIN): TRAIN GRAPH OF NEW MODEL NIEUWEGEIN ZUID – P+R DE UITHOF
Content slide, two columns with image
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
KEY NUMBERS NEW AND ADAPTED MODEL – SCENARIO C1 (MODIFIED OVT LAYOUT, SPEED MODIFICATIONS , CAF VEHICLE) HEADWAY 15 / 7,5 / 3,75 MIN
Nieuwegein Ijsselstein
Runtime PRU–NWG/ISS (including dwell times) 46,5 min 53,5 min
Runtime ISS/NWG – PRU (including dwell times) 47 min 54 min
Turnaround time 10,5 min 11,5 min
Runtime Uithof Line To PRU 17 min To OVT 16 min
Turnaround time P+R Uithof 4,5 min
Turnaround time OVT Uithof Line 4 min
Duty roster 150 min 165 min
Duty roster performance 83% 84%
Number of vehicles (without reserve) 10*2 units 11*2 units
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
RISK ANALYSIS SCENARIO C1
• So far Regiotram calculated with 27 for the Uithof start operation and then 26 options on top of this, in total 53, 26 vehicles are today operating on the SUNIJ-line. But this takes not the efficiency gains of the combined operation into account.
• Ramboll/MMD have calculated 42 vehicles for this without reserve
• Short turn-around times at P+R and OVT
• High efficiency
• There is a risk is that due to higher stop times (the doors at the SIG trams are now opening at a speed below 3 km/h, the new CAF trams will have to go down to 0 km/h) the gain in run times can be lost again.
• In this case a reliable operation can be assured by using 2 more vehicles and longer turn-around times.
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
Content slide, two columns with image
CONCLUSION
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
CONCLUSION
Content slide, two columns with image
New OpenTrack model:
• New model infrastructure built-up
• Model results of Prior Ops Study confirmed
• Runtime of CAF vehicles in preliminary model runs slightly shorter
than reference vehicle from Prior Ops Study
• Effect of runtime on key number of scenario C2 with 12 / 6 / 3 min headway
(shorter runtime, longer turnaround)
• Concept of scenario C1 with 15 / 7,5 / 3-4 min headway implemented
• Modification of speed profile does not affect the runtime significantly
Model ready to use for further analysis and new scenarios
JANUARY 2016
REGIOTRAM UTRECHT - OPERATIONAL MODELLING
End slide
Click to edit Master text styles
Nils Jänig, Director Ramboll Transport
T +49 (0)151 5801 5204
E nij@ramboll.com
Joost Bolck, Business Development Manager Mott MacDonald
T +31 6 5115 8247
E joost.bolck@mottmac.nl
top related