snapvalet arb rdcr global trojan solutions – team 03 1

SnapValet ARB RDCRGlobal Trojan Solutions – Team 03

1

SnapValet ARB Team Evaluation Molly Karcher

Strengths and Weaknesses: Operational ViewStrengths• All members are friendly,

collaborative, and punctual in regards to deadlines

• Strong sense of communal responsibility for deliverables

• Client is very available, agreeable, and responsive

• Quick and decisive in task delegation; good sense of communal responsibility

• Use of online collaboration tools (Google groups, Bugzilla, Winbook, Facebook messages, etc.

• Better cross-role collaboration since first ARB

Weaknesses• Deliverables generated very

close to deadlines, leaves minimal time for verification

• Lack of availability of remote team member during normal workday hours

• Becoming less conscientious about sending meeting minutes and updating Bugzilla tasks as final exams for other classes approach

• Will lose one teammate in 577b

Strengths and Weaknesses: Technical View

Strengths

• All computer science Masters students - quickly & effectively learn new technologies

• Strong familiarity with MySQL

• Strong familiarity with Java (easy transition to Android)

• Some of the team took Web Tech this semester

• COTS tools nailed down and prototyped

Weaknesses

• Lack of mobile development experience

• Lack of familiarity with Braintree API

• Scope creep• Lack of experience

building scalable systems from scratch

Overall Project Evaluation

• Detailed/feasible, though very ambitious schedule for 577b– Development will need to be very closely tracked to

ensure we maintain schedule.

• All high risks have been identified as requirements stabilized, and all have mitigation plans, but have not actually be mitigated yet– At present, not all Win Conditions have been prototyped

• Technical architecture was developed very thoroughly and with collaboration of entire team, so it is very well understood – Should ease initial phases of development & learning

curve for all developers

Test Plan & CasesMolly Karcher

6

Testing Strategy Overview

• Unit testing• Eclipse & JUnit• Value-based prioritization• Targeting 70% unit test coverage on core API

• Automated Functional Testing• Validation on one client operating system• Functional tests map to TC-01 through TC-07 from TCP• Requirements-Test traceability• Test suite run on-commit

• Formal Quality & Acceptance Testing• Functional tests performed manually on clients pointing to a

deployed production box

7

Testing Preparation

• Hardware

• Local development: laptop

• Formal acceptance testing: deployment box, client devices

• Software

• SnapValet codebase

• Unit Testing – Eclipse, MySQL, JUnit plug-in

• Functional Testing – Xcode, KIF framework

8

Test Schedule

• Test Suite Milestone 1 – March 1st 2015• TC-01 User Profiles (01-03)

• TC-03 Geolocation Check-in (01)

• TC-06 Admin Accounts (01-05)

• Server Unit Testing - 20% coverage

• Core Capabilities Drivethrough – March 25th 2015• TC-04 Car Retrievals (01)

• TC-05 Payments (01-03)

• TC-02 Valet Queue (01-06)

• Server Unit Testing – 50% coverage

• Transition Readiness Review – April 8th 2015• TC-07 Load Testing (01)

• Server Unit Testing – 70% coverage

• Formal Quality & Acceptance Testing – April 15th 20159

Operations Concept Description

Brian Vanover

10

Outline

• System Boundary

11

System Boundaries

12

SnapValet ARB Prototype III

Global Trojan Solutions – Team 03

13

Outline

• Play Framework Client-Server Web Application Prototype

• Valet/Customer Login

• Valet/Customer Check-in

• Customer payment/vehicle request

• Valet Company Management Interfaces• Employee Manager• Venue Manager

• PhoneGap Integrationo Android

14

Play Framework Client-Server Web Application PrototypeModels-Customer-Location-User-Valet-ValetCheckin-User-ValetCompany-ValetRequestViews-employeemanager-index-venuemanager-Checkincustomer-checkinvaletController-Application-CustomerController-ValetController

15

PhoneGap Integration• Android • iOS

• Pending developer license

16

SnapValet ARB SSADGlobal Trojan Solutions – Team 03

17

Outline

• System Context

• Artifacts & Information

• Behavior (Use case Diagram)

• Hardware Component Diagram

• Software Component Diagram

• Deployment Diagram

• Class Diagram

• Sequence Diagram (for two major use cases)

18

System Context

19

Artifacts & Information

20

Behavior (Use case Diagram)

21

Hardware Component Diagram

22

Software Component Diagram

23

Deployment Diagram

24

Class Diagram

25

Sequence Diagram

26

Ridhima Manjrekar

Life Cycle Plan

27

Stakeholder roles

Role Team Member

Client Mona A

Project Manager, Developer

Brian Vanover

Feasibility Analyst, Developer

Patrick Horng

IIV & V QFP

Molly Karcher

Requirements Engineer, Life Cycle Planner, Developer

Ridhima Manjrekar

System ArchitectUML Modeler, Developer

Ditong Ding

Operational Concept Engineer Developer

Brian Bousman

System Maintainer SnapValet employee28

Milestones

DCRDCR RDCRRDCR

CCDCCD

TRRTRR

OCROCR

29

Activities & Responsibilities

30

Activities & Responsibilities

31

Activities & Responsibilities

32

Iteration Plan

Iteration 0 – Preparation

1. Train new team members for project details.

2.Meet with client to verify the requirements

3.Set up develop environment

4.Designing the database

5.Developers get familiar with Play frameworks and

PhoneGap

33

Iteration Plan

Iteration 1 – Core Capability

1. Login and profile management

2.Geo location check-in

3.Connecting the database to valet side and customer side

operations of the app

4.GUI design and implementation

5.Develop payment functionality

6.Prototyping PhoneGap

7.Finishing test plan

34

Iteration Plan

Iteration 2 – Full Capability

1. Valet side Website

2.Improved user interface

3.Preparing user manual /demo video

4.Product installation and Transition

5.Rigorous Integration testing

35

Core CapabilitiesID Trace Capability Description Priority Iteration1 UC-1,5

TC-02-01, TC-03-01

Geo-Location check in

A customer and a valet should be able to check-in at the establishment (location) they are at.

High 1 

2 UC-6, OC-1TC-05-01

Mobile transaction

A customer should be able to pay for valet service using his credit card on the application.

High 1

3 UC-6, OC-4TC-04-01

Ticket number entry

The customer must be able to enter his valet ticket number into the application.

High 1

4 UC-6, OC-2TC-04-01

Request Vehicle A customer should be able to request for his vehicle via the app.

High 1

5 UC-4, OC-5TC-02-04

Retrieval Notification

A customer should receive a notification on his device when his vehicle is being retrieved.

High 1

6 UC-4, OC-3TC-02-04

Queue : Retrieve The valet is able to visually validate the ticket number and then notify the customer of car retrieval.

High 1

7 UC-4, OC-3TC-02-04

Queue : Report “invalid” ticket number

The valet is able to notify a customer that he/she entered a wrong ticket number

High 1

8 UC-4, OC-3TC-02-04

Queue : Close out request

A valet is able to close out a served request and remove it from the queue

High 1

9 UC-2, TC-02-02, TC-02-06

Start and close out a shift

A valet should be able to start a shift for other valets to add on to and be able to close out a shift.

High 1

10 UC-2,7, TC-01-01, TC-01-02, TC-01-03

Profile management

A customer and a valet are able to register and create a profile on the app.

High 136

Patrick Horng

Feasibility Evidence Description

37

Business Case Analysis

38

Personnel Cost

39

ROI Analysis

40

NDI/NCS Analysis

41

NDI/NCS Usages CommentsGoogle Places Interactively maps for

searching and displaying places

Positive points:   - Freeware   - Widely used

Braintree Mobile transaction platform

Positive points:   - Widely used and trustworthy for performance

MySQL Database Positive points:   - Freeware   - Suitable for Large/Small scale systems   - Widely used and trustworthy for performance   - Client’s requirement

Play Framework Framework – app development

Positive points:   - Freeware   - Platform independent   - Web app development conforms to client requirement for iOS and Android development

Bootstrap Styling responsive web design

Positive points:   - Freeware   - Widely used

Risk Analysis

42

Risks

Risk Exposure

Risk MitigationsPotentia

l Magnitu

de

Probability Loss

Risk Exposu

re

Inexperience with mobile development may hinder system development (Personnel Shortfalls)

10->3 1 10->3 Use of Play Framework to remove platform dependency. Learning curve is now dependent on Play Framework which is not that difficult to pick up.

Client uncertainties and changes regarding system workflow requirements i.e. admin console and/or web application may cause the project to expand out of scope (Underdefined Plans and Requirements)

4 4 16 The team will conduct multiple rounds of win negotiations to ensure that both clients and developers are satisfied with the agreed deliverables and system requirements

Mobile transactions may create an insecure environment and foster the breach of sensitive data (Value Conflict)

6 2 12 The team will learn and apply best practices for securing the application.

Risk Analysis – Cont’d

43

Risks

Risk Exposure

Risk MitigationsPotential Magnitud

e

Probability Loss

Risk Exposur

eUnclear full understandings of the current process model for valet parking may cause developers and acquirers to fall out of sync with user win conditions (SCS Lack of Involvement)

2 6 12 The client and project manager will conduct user interviews of valet companies and operators. The team will develop various workflow solutions and discuss these with the users.

Valet operations at unofficial events/venues such as concerts/football games or large house parties may not be locatable by geolocation APIs (NDI Conflict)

1 9 9 The team will apply risk avoidance pending client approval.

Current valet business process regarding transaction management may be incompatible with proposed SnapValet transaction management solutions (SCS Lack of Involvement / Value Conflict)

8 5 40 The client and project manager will discuss current transaction management practices with two large, Los Angeles-based valet companies.

Risk Analysis – New

44

Risks

Risk Exposure

Risk MitigationsPotential Magnitud

e

Probability Loss

Risk Exposure

New requirements for an administrative web interface for valet companies may cause the project to fall out of scope and prevent developers from finishing the program on time and within budget

8 8 64 The team will only agree to develop the minimum sufficient conditions for the web interface such as registration and employee addition/deletion

New client driven requirements regarding changes to the transaction process may cause the schedule to fall behind due to scope creep

9 8 72 The developers will meet with the client to discuss which win conditions she is willing to sacrifice for new requirements

A low colocation rate (i.e. high number of DEN students) may hamper team cohesion, cooperation, and communication

7 10 70 The project manager will re-contact missing team members and establish guidelines for effective communication

The team's late adoption of a web framework and PhoneGap may result in hastly development/implementation that leaves inadequate time/resources for testing and quality assurance

9 7 63 The team will develop and test in parallel. As components are added, they will immediately be tested by our IVV team

Risk Analysis – Removed

45

Risks

Risk Exposure

Risk MitigationsPotentia

l Magnitu

de

Probability Loss

Risk Exposu

re

Developers schedules may prevent developers from completing Android training in a reasonable time (Inflated Expectations)

10 1 10 The team will take advantage of group development sessions such as team meetings and hack nights to complete the android tutorials

Uncertainties surrounding profile management may cause the interface to be too complex/confusing (Human-System Integration Shortfalls)

2 5 10 Information gathered from user interviews will be used in conjunction with interface and profile architecture prototyping

There is uncertainty surrounding the selection of a transaction management NDI/COTS which may lead to selection of an improper or mobile incompatible product (NDI Conflicts)

5 2 10 The team will evaluate various mobile transaction management NDIs and choose two that will be prototyped in parallel in a mobile development environment.

Traceability Matrix

46

OCD Requirements Use Cases Test Cases

OC-1 Mobile Transaction WC-3392, WC-3204 UC-4, UC-6

TC-04-01, TC-05-01, TC-05-02, TC-05-03

OC-2 NotificationsWC-3390, WC-3386, WC-3384, WC-3205 UC-4, UC-6

TC-02-03, TC-02-04, TC-02-05, TC-04-01

OC-3 Admin InterfacingWC-3391, WC-3387, WC-3385

UC-8, UC-9, UC-11, UC-13, UC-12

TC-02-02, TC-06-01, TC-06-02, TC-06-03, TC-06-04, TC-06-05

OC-4 Geolocation Checkin WC-3215, WC-3203 UC-1, UC-5 TC-02-01, TC-03-01

OC-5 Profile Management WC-3387, WC-3208

UC-2, UC-5, UC-7

TC-01-01, TC-01-02, TC-01-03

OC-6 Advertising WC-3210 UC-5 TC-03-01

Definition of Done

47

• Automated unit/integration testing completed

• All test plans/cases written and passed (Acceptance tested)

• All code documented properly

• All functionalities and features documented in user manual

• All code checked into Github (VC repository)

• All code deployed onto demo server; deployable on

Android and iOS devices

Metric Results I – Estimate vs. Actual Hours

48

Metric Results II – Defect Status

49

Technical Debt

50

Issues Possible Solutions

1. Requirements volatility• Interactive admin web

interface• Advertisement win condition

Sit down with client (Mona) and have another Win Win negotation. Bi-monthly updates for client.

2. Lack of domain experience• Problems with Play Framework and Scala and setting up environment• Have not used other APIs before (Braintree/Google Places/Bootstrap)

Go through tutorials; have other teammates help each other overcome the learning curve.

3. Infeasible scheduling Pseduo-agile meetings. Need to include DEN students more often.

4. Hard coding Temporary due to initial development. Need to reduce/minimize the amount of hard-coding.

5. Automated testing Boy Scout – incremental testing and feedback.

Questions?

51