social dimensions of health institute, universities of dundee & st andrews standards and...
Post on 18-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Standards and individuals: GPs’ views of what matters for quality
Vikki Entwistle
31 October 2007
Seminar for School of Public Health
University of Sydney
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
• University of Sydney International Visiting Fellowship Scheme
• Alex Barratt and Lyndal Trevena
• Many other members of School of Public Health who have helped with this study and/or otherwise helped to ensure my visit has been productive and enjoyable.
Thank you!
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Help!
• Thoughts on this ‘work in progress’ will be welcome!
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Background
• Understandings of what constitutes ‘good’ medical practice continue to evolve.
• Current notions emphasise evidence based medicine (EBM) and patient involvement (PI).
• Governments have invested in various strategies to improve (aspects of) health care quality.
• There have been few studies of GPs’ views of shifting agendas and improvement initiatives.
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
EBM: issues in 1990s
• First accounts downplayed clinical expertise
• Compatibility with patient-centred care disputed
• Applicability to general practice contested
• Studies of GPs’ attitudes found concerns about:– Lack of relevant evidence– Lack of resources for accessing evidence– Lack of skills for appraising evidence
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
EBM: more recently
Clinical state & circumstance
Research evidencePatient’s preferences and actions
Clinical expertise
Haynes et al, 2002
• More research conducted in general practice• Research findings more accessible • Clinical expertise now emphasised
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Quality incentive payments
• Australia and UK both offer incentive payments for GP management of chronic conditions
• For, e.g. diabetes, they promote similar forms of care with similar goals…
• … but incentives were introduced into different ‘basic’ payment systems…
• … and the UK scheme rewards ‘outcomes’ as well as care processes
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Key Medicare items of interest
• Service and Practice Incentive Payments (SIPs and PIPs), including for: – Having diabetes register / recall system– Completing annual ‘cycle of care’ for diabetes patients– Having completed cycle for 20% of diabetes patients
• Enhanced Primary Care items, including:– Care planning for people with chronic conditions– Care planning for people with mental health problems
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Study aim
• Investigate GPs’ perspectives on what is required of good GP today, including:– Understandings of and attitudes towards:
Evidence based medicine
Patient involvement in decision making
– Experiences of financial incentive schemes and thoughts about their implications for quality
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Target sample
• About 20 GPs from metropolitan NSW (pragmatic considerations)
• Reasonably diverse in terms of: – Gender– Length of time in practice– Practising in more/less affluent areas– [Interest in EBM / patient involvement]
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Recruitment
• Invitations were: – posted to NSW GPs identified from Medical
Directory of Australia– e-mailed to USyd academic GP list– given/left at occasional GP meetings– passed on by participants and colleagues
• Invitations included: – Initial response form, pre-paid reply envelope– Offer of $150 honorarium
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Data collection
• Face-to-face interviews
• ≥1 hour conversations
• Focusing on key topic areas, but not strictly structured
• Audio-recorded
• Transcribed
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Topic areas
• Key features of good quality GP care– Evidence based medicine (EBM)– Patient involvement (PI)
• Quality improvement initiatives – Influence in practice, implications for quality
• Current challenges and possible solutions in their efforts to deliver quality care
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Analysis
• Initial familiarisation
→ Development of thematic framework
→ Systematic coding of data (N-vivo)
→ Charting to summarise and further analyse e.g. relationships between:– Understandings of EBM & views of its importance– Practice characteristics & implications of incentives– Views of incentives & aspects of quality emphasised
• NB general statements cf specific examples
•
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Sample
• 18 GPs interviewed to date:– 9 male, 9 female– Graduated 12 - 46 years ago– Some diversity in ethnic background– 4 solo practitioners, 2 in two GP practices– Practicing in more and less affluent areas– 2 don’t bulk bill at all
• 4 more interviews scheduled
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Health warning!
• Data collection is ongoing• Only 16 interviews have been transcribed• Only 12 transcriptions have been checked• I’m presenting impressions and preliminary
observations only
Your thoughts about issues we should be careful to look at further are welcome!
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
What has surprised me?• Features (and implications) of Australian system
I hadn’t appreciated:– Pervasiveness of financial considerations– Variety within general practice – Mobility of GPs– Ease/frequency of patient “doctor (s)hopping”
• Amount of concern expressed about other GPs’ clinical competence and ethics
• Disclosure of behaviours thought less than ideal
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Evidence based medicine
• All have the gist…• Some have more sophisticated understandings• Descriptor ‘evidence based’ often attached to
particular clinical interventions or targets• All think EBM is somehow important for quality
– “Everything we do should be evidence based”
or– “It’s very important – just not the whole story”
(See what EBM requires as perhaps conflicting with what patient can/wants to do)
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
“Doing” evidence based medicine
• Updating by reading Australian Doctor etc., listening to specialists, being wary of drug reps, doing CME…
• Following guidelines• Getting on top of research relating to common
problem then just doing (not consciously EBM)• [Few, including academics] searching Medline or
Cochrane when uncertain– Patient brings alternative remedy / information in– Waiting to get patient into specialist
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Challenges of doing EBM (1)
• Lack of accessible information resources• Lack of ability to interpret / appraise research• Volume of potentially relevant information• Lack of time for update reading• No time to look things up in consultations (and
no reimbursement)• Mishaps like Vioxx• Gaps or biases in research
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Challenges of doing EBM (2)
• Not sure when research findings apply
• [GP’s preferences and experiences]
• Patient’s preferences and actions…
• … in a context in which a patient who doesn’t like what you offer/recommend might just take their business to another GP
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
GPs’ views of EBM model
• Mostly “yes!”• Goal is increased overlap• Some qualifiers:
– If ‘clinical expertise’ isn’t cold clinical
– Unless patient preferences are off the page
– The circles might not always be equalDoes this ring true?
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Which forms of use of research evidence, which
ways of attending to patients’ preferences should
‘count’ as EBM?
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Discussing evidence with patients (1)
When and why?• So patients know basis of recommendations• To show “it’s not just me saying this”• To support recommendations • To “sell” preventive interventions• To overcome patient concerns• To respond to “my friend…”, “my naturopath…”,
“this information… ” queries• Because (affluent, educated) patients expect it
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Discussing evidence with patients (2)How?• Show guidelines• Talk through flowchart• Mention studies in conversation
– Variable presentation! • Patient might not need/want details• GP might not know/recall details
How does this relate to GP talk about how things work?
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
About SIPs and PIPs for diabetes
• Cycle of care items are important
• “We were doing them anyway”
• Reasons for not claiming:– Object to accreditation requirement– Practice not accredited (not worth effort)– Administrative burden (esp. small practices)– Salaried GP– Not ‘main’ GP for many people with diabetes– Mobile population, difficulties with follow up
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
About care plans• Can usefully encourage thorough review
– But formal structure may ↓ holism, rapport – Busy GPs don’t have time to complete
• Don’t necessarily improve care quality– ‘Cavalier’ completion, not evidence-based– May lead to some over-servicing
• Could be more effective with built-in templates
• Some inapp’te (AHP prompted) patient demand • Good income earner for GPs (often abused)• Waste of collective health care $?
Social Dimensions of Health Institute, Universities of Dundee & St Andrews
Initial thoughts about possible Australia – UK differences
Patient mobility in Australia:• (Combined with financial considerations) may
incline GPs to accede to patients’ wishes• Lets GPs glean what their colleagues do • Raises issues of professional etiquette and who
claims incentive payments
Differences in broader payment arrangements:• Render individual GP circumstances more
important in Australia
top related