sona tm jnc

State of the National Association Talent Management | Learning and Development

Principles to follow: ✓  Be wary of intellectual arrogance ✓  Have you heard of growth mindset?

WARNING Talent Management | Learning and Development

Late Submissions:

•  Thapar •  Chandigarh •  Hyderabad •  Lucknow

•  Jaipur •  Dehradun •  Delhi IIT

Not Submitted/ Incomplete

•  Baroda •  Surat

•  Mumbai •  Jodhpur

MC Update Associate Membership:

2 1 0 T M P

A s s o c i a t e M e m b e r s h i p ,

p r o d u c e d

1 1 0 o G C D P

A s s o c i a t e M e m b e r s h i p ,

p r o d u c e d

But is it all worth it?

ANALYSIS FOCUSING

ON 5 MOS FOR TALENT

MEMBER RETENTION

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY

ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS

% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS

1 3 0 0 T M P

I n M a r c h a n d A p r i l ,

A I E S E C I n d i a r e c r u i t e d

8 0 0 p i p e l i n e

a n d w e h a d

MEMBER RETENTION

1 3 0 0 T M P

I n M a r c h a n d A p r i l ,

A I E S E C I n d i a r e c r u i t e d

8 0 0 p i p e l i n e

a n d w e h a d N o w ,

A I E S E C I n d i a h a s 1 5 6 2

T M P

MEMBER RETENTION

5 3 9

W e l o s t

m e m b e r s i n 2 m o n t h s .

MEMBER RETENTION

oGCDP Newie Retention Rate

7 0 % u n d e r

7 5 % u n d e r

5 9 % u n d e r

6 9 % u n d e r

iGCDP Newie Retention Rate

oGIP Newie Retention Rate iGIP Newie Retention Rate

MEMBER RETENTION

MEMBER RETENTION

“Is this even accurate?”

5 3 9 W H Y ?

MEMBER RETENTION

“How can we ensure that we increase our retention rate?” “How can we ensure this data is accurate?”

% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS

0

60

120

180

240

300

JNC Audit May Audit Team Member Program Statistics on the system

“How can we ensure that we increase our retention rate?”

G E T K E E P C O N T R I B U T E

MEMBER RETENTION

“How can we ensure that we increase our retention rate?”

A R E W E R E C R U I T I N G T H E R I G H T P E O P L E ?

A R E W E F U L F I L L I N G T E A M M I N I M U M S ?

A R E O U R M E M B E R S P R O D U C T I V E ?

MEMBER RETENTION

AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY

1 5 6 2

I G C D P 3 0 3

I G I P 2 4 0

O G C D P 2 6 9

O G I P 1 2 2 A R E O U R

M E M B E R S P R O D U C T I V E ?

AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY

1 5 6 2

I G C D P 3 0 3

I G I P 2 4 0

O G C D P 2 6 9

O G I P 1 2 2

2180  RA   3.64

A R E O U R M E M B E R S

P R O D U C T I V E ?

2 1 8 0 R A

1 1 0 5 M A

6 2 7 R A 3 0 4 M A 1.26

7 5 3 R A 7 5 7 M A 2.79

1 5 5 R A 5 3 M A 0.43

AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY

1 . 4 6

A R E O U R M E M B E R S

P R O D U C T I V E ?

4

O u t o f 1 5 6 2 T M P ,

9 3 7 T M P

a r e n o t -p e r f o r m i n g .

6 2 5 p e r f o r m i n g

a n d w e h a v e

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

A R E O U R M E M B E R S

P R O D U C T I V E ?

of iGCDP is not performing

of oGCDP is not performing

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

A R E O U R M E M B E R S

P R O D U C T I V E ?

of iGIP is not performing

of oGIP is not performing

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

A R E O U R M E M B E R S

P R O D U C T I V E ?

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

What is the hindering our productivity?

The problem is not with increasing productivity, it’s about making more people

productive.

How should you calculate the productivity of back office?

A R E O U R M E M B E R S

P R O D U C T I V E ?

ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS

3 0 % O F T H E T E A M S I N

A I E S E C I N D I A H A V E A T E A M

P U R P O S E

1 4 % O F T E A M L E A D E R S G I V E

M O N T H L Y C O A C H I N G C H A T S

8 % O F O F T E A M S H A V E R E F L E C T I O N

A R E W E F U L F I L L I N G

T E A M M I N I M U M S

T E A M M I N I M U M S

1

2

5 3 7

6

Team

Plan

JD

Training

4

Tracking & Coaching

Evaluation

Reflection

85% 0 14% 8%

54% 60% 45%

ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS

A I E S E C I N D I A D O E N ’ T H A V E

P R O P E R J D S F O R A N Y O N E

% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS

No LC’s submitted accurate Talent Management data during Audits

ANALYSIS FOCUSING

ON 5 MOS FOR TALENT

MEMBER RETENTION

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY

ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS

% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS

Parameters:

MEMBER RETENTION

% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE

AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY

ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS

% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS

SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS: % of seniors

VPTM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

LC STANDINGS 5 MOS

FOR TALENT

% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS

K O L K A T A

D E H R A D U N

H Y D E R A B A D

Top performers in Yellow

D E L H I U N I V E R S I T Y

L E A D P R O C E S S I S H A P H A Z A R D A C R O S S

C O M M I S S I O N N O T R A I N I N G S K I L L S

I N A N Y L C T R A I N I N G S C H E D U L E S

N O T A L I G N E D T O E X C H A N G E P E A K

LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT

L E A D L E A R N I N G

5 3 9

W e l o s t

m e m b e r s i n 2 m o n t h s .

5 9 % u n d e r

O G I P 1 2 2 1 5 5 R A 5 3 M A 0.43

5 5 % o v e r

3 0 % O F T H E T E A M S I N

A I E S E C I N D I A H A V E A T E A M

P U R P O S E

T A 1 E N T

E V E R Y M E M B E R I S I M P O R T A N T

E V E R Y M E M B E R M A T T E R S

T A 1 E N T

E V E R Y M E M B E R I S I M P O R T A N T

E V E R Y M E M B E R M A T T E R S