spanx v. yummie tummie - motion re 2d am compl
Post on 08-Aug-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
1/72
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
SPANX, INC., )
)
Plaintiff, ) Civil Action
)
v. ) No. 1:13-cv-00710-WSD
)
TIMES THREE CLOTHIER, LLC )
d/b/a Yummie Tummie, )
)
Defendant. )
CONSENT ORDER REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
By stipulation and agreement of the parties, and with the express consent of
plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Spanx, Inc. (Spanx) and defendant and
counterclaim plaintiff Times Three Clothier, LLC (Times Three), as indicated by
the signatures of their respective counsel below, and in accordance with Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15 (a) (2) permitting amendments to pleadings with the written consent of
the parties; and
It appearing that Spanx filed its Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this
matter on March 5, 2013 [Dkt-1] seeking declaratory relief that Spanx did not
infringe seven patents asserted against Spanx in a January 18, 2013 letter from
Times Three (namely, U.S. Design Patent Nos. D606,285S (the 285 Patent),
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 4
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
2/72
- 2 -
D616,627S (the 627 Patent), D632,051S (the 051 Patent), D632,052S (the
052 Patent), D632,053S (the 053 Patent), D622,477S (the 477 Patent ), and
D623,377S (the 377 Patent)) and sought, obtained and filed on April 5, 2013
Times Threes Waiver of Service thereof [Dkt-5]; and
It further appearing that Times Three filed and served Defendant Times
Three Clothier, LLCs Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims on May
13, 2013[Dkt-17] counterclaiming infringement of certain of the patents asserted in
the January 18, 2013 Letter (namely the 285, 627, 477, and 377 Patents) and
two additional patents (namely, U.S. Design Patent Nos. D665,558S (the 558
Patent) and D666,384S (the 384 Patent)) against Spanx and admitting that
certain of Spanxs products did not infringe any valid claim of three of the seven
patents originally asserted in its January 18, 2013 letter (namely, the 051, 052
and 053 Patents); and
It further appearing that, on June 6, 2013, Spanx filed and served its First
Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief [Dkt-20], adding declaratory
judgment claims of non-infringement for the newly asserted 558 and 384 Patents
and adding declaratory judgment claims of invalidity for all nine patents including
the 051, 052 and 053 Patents; and
It further appearing that counsel for the parties have conferred regarding the
how to address the 051, 052 and 053 Patents no longer being asserted by Times
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30 Filed 07/31/13 Page 2 of 4
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
3/72
- 3 -
Three against Spanx and how to simplify the pleadings in this matter and in light of
Times Threes decision not to pursue infringement claims against Spanx with
respect to those Patents, and have agreed, as set forth in this Consent Order, that
Spanx may amend its Complaint in this action to remove, without prejudice,
Spanxs non-infringement and invalidity claims as to the 051, 052 and 053
Patents, such that the action may continue as to the Patents that remain in dispute;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
(1) Spanx is hereby granted leave to file and serve a Second Amended
Complaint for Declaratory Relief herein, as per the marked pleading attached as
Exhibit A;
(2) The removal of Spanxs claims as to the 051, 052 and 053 Patents
is without prejudice, is not an adjudication on the merits, and does not constitute
either claim or issue preclusion;
(3) Times Three shall not file or serve any response to Spanxs First
Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief; and
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30 Filed 07/31/13 Page 3 of 4
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
4/72
- 4 -
(4) Times Three shall file and serve a response to Spanxs Second
Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief in accordance with the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED, this ______ day of __________, 2013.
WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR.UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CONSENTED TO:
Counsel for Plaintiff and Counsel for Defendant and
Counterclaim Defendant Counterclaim Plaintiff
SPANX, INC.: TIMES THREE CLOTHIER, LLC:
/s/ Natasha H. Moffitt __ /s/ Theodore H. Davis Jr.
Natasha H. Moffitt Theodore H. Davis Jr.
(Georgia Bar No. 367468) (Georgia Bar No. 212913)
Laura S. Huffman Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
King & Spalding LLP 1100 Peachtree Street
1180 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 2800
Atlanta, GA 30309-3521 Atlanta, GA 30309
Kathleen E. McCarthy Steven B. Pokotilow
King & Spalding LLP Laura Goldbard George
1185 Avenue of the Americas Irah H. Donner
New York, NY 10036 Binni N. Shah
New York, NY 10036 Stroock Stroock & Lavan
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038-4982
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30 Filed 07/31/13 Page 4 of 4
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
5/72
Exhibit A
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
6/72
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
SPANX, INC., )
)
Plaintiff, ) Civil Action
)
v. ) No. 1:13-cv-00710-WSD
)
TIMES THREE CLOTHIER, LLC )
d/b/a Yummie Tummie, ))
Defendant. )
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
Plaintiff Spanx, Inc. (Spanx) alleges as follows for its second amended
complaint against Times Three Clothier d/b/a Yummie Tummie (Yummie
Tummie):
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Spanx is a Georgia corporation with its principal place ofbusiness at 3344 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 1700, Atlanta, Georgia 30326. Spanx
is an apparel company that designs and manufactures, among other things,
undergarments, slimming apparel and shapewear, hosiery, swimsuits, and
activewear.
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 2 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
7/72
- 2 -
2. On information and belief, Defendant Yummie Tummie is a NewYork Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business at 561
Seventh Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10018. On information and
belief, Yummie Tummie manufactures and sells bodyshaping undergarments and
apparel.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35of the United States Code, 1 et seq., with a specific remedy sought under the
Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202. An actual,
substantial, and continuing justiciable controversy exists between Spanx and
Yummie Tummie that requires a declaration of rights by this Court.
4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).
5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Yummie Tummie by virtueof Yummie Tummies purposeful contact with this district, including, on
information and belief, Yummie Tummies substantial business conducted with
customers residing in this district; and Yummie Tummies attempts to enforce
design patents purportedly assigned to it against Spanx, an entity having a principal
place of business in Georgia, for alleged infringing activity occurring in Georgia.
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 3 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
8/72
- 3 -
6. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391.FACTUAL BACKGROUND
7. Defendant Yummie Tummie claims to be the owner by assignment ofU.S. Design Patent Nos.D606,285S (the 285 Patent, copy attached hereto as
Exhibit A), D616,627S (the 627 Patent, copy attached hereto as Exhibit B),
D622,477S (the 477 Patent, copy attached hereto as Exhibit C), and D623,377S
(the 377 Patent, copy attached hereto as Exhibit D), D665,558S (the 558
Patent, copy attached hereto as Exhibit E) and D666,384S (the 384 Patent,
copy attached hereto as Exhibit F) (collectively, the Patents-in-Suit).
8. The Patents-in-Suit are related to one another in that the 627 Patent,the 477 Patent, the 377 Patent, the 558 Patent, and the 384 Patent all claim
priority to the 285 Patent.
9. Each of the Patents-in-Suit identifies Heather Thompson Schindler asthe sole inventor.
10. On or about January 18, 2013, Yummie Tummie (through counsel)contacted Spanx by letter, informing Spanx that Yummie Tummie is the owner of
some of the Patents-in-Suit, enclosing a copy of the said patents, and stating that
Spanx is making, offering for sale and selling shapewear products in the
United States that contain Yummies patented designs and that the Spanx
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 4 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
9/72
- 4 -
products appear substantially the same as the patented designs from the point of
view of an ordinary observer, thereby, constituting design patent infringement. In
its January 18 letter, Yummie Tummie identified the allegedly infringing Spanx
products as including The Total Taming Tank A226764, also known as The
Spanx Total Taming Tank, the Top This Tank Style 1847 and The Top This Cami
Style 1846 (collectively, the Accused Products). Yummie Tummie further
noted in its letter that it vigorously enforces the rights in its patents, referenced
patent infringement litigation it recently settled with Maidenform, and demanded,
among other things, that Spanx cease manufacturing, offering for sale, and selling
the Accused Products.
11. On or about February 14, 2013, Spanx (through counsel) responded toYummie Tummies January 18, 2013 letter, describing in detail significant
differences between the Accused Products and Yummie Tummies patents that and
stating, among other things, that it does not believe the Accused Products infringe
Yummie Tummies patents.
12. Since Yummie Tummie contacted Spanx in January 2013, counsel forSpanx and Yummie Tummie have communicated on several occasions by
telephone and in writing concerning Yummie Tummies claims. During these
telephone conferences, Yummie Tummie continued to maintain that the Accused
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 5 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
10/72
- 5 -
Products infringe its patents and expressed its willingness to enforce its patents
against Spanx.
13. On April 2, 2013, a month after Spanx initially brought this action fordeclaratory relief, Yummie Tummie filed suit against Spanx in the Southern
District of New York, asserting that the Accused Products infringe the Patents-in-
Suit. Spanx has denied infringement in the New York action and has also asserted
that the parties dispute should not proceed in New York but in this, the first-filed
court, the Northern District of Georgia.
14. As a result of Yummie Tummies previous and continued assertionsthat Spanx is infringing the Patents-in-Suit, and Spanxs denial of the same, an
actual and justiciable controversy exists between the parties of sufficient
immediacy and reality to warrant issuance of a declaratory judgment under 28
U.S.C. 2201 and 2202 as to the alleged infringement and invalidity of the
designs claimed in the Patents-in-Suit.
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT)
15. Spanx restates and incorporates by reference the allegations inparagraphs 1 through 14 above.
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 6 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
11/72
- 6 -
16. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the partieswith respect to the alleged infringement of the Patents-in-Suit. Spanx contends
that Spanxs products, including The Total Taming Tank A226764, also known as
The Spanx Total Taming Tank, the Top This Tank Style 1847, and The Top This
Cami Style 1846 have not infringed and do not infringe any valid claim of the
Patents-in-Suit. Upon information and belief, Yummie Tummie currently disputes
these contentions.
17. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202, a judicial determination ofthe respective rights of the parties with respect to the alleged infringement of the
Patents-in-Suit is necessary and appropriate under the circumstances.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT)
18. Spanx restates and incorporates by reference the allegations inparagraphs 1 through 17 above.
19. Spanx contends that the Patents-in-Suit are invalid for failure to meetone or more of the conditions of patentability specified in 35 U.S.C. 102, 103,
112, and/or 171. Upon information and belief, Yummie Tummie disputes these
contentions.
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 7 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
12/72
- 7 -
20. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202, a judicial determination ofthe respective rights of the parties with respect to the alleged invalidity of the
Patents-in-Suit is necessary and appropriate under the circumstances.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Spanx prays for relief as follows:
A. For a judicial declaration that Spanx does not infringe any valid claimof U.S. Design Patent Nos.D606,285S, D616,627S, D622,477S, D623,377S,
D665,558S, and D666,384S; and
B. For a judicial declaration that U.S. Design Patent Nos.D606,285S,D616,627S, D622,477S, D623,377S, D665,558S, and D666,384S are invalid; and
C. For an order awarding Spanx its costs, expenses, and reasonableattorneys fees as provided by law; and
D. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.JURY DEMAND
Spanx demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable as a matter of right and
law.
Respectfully submitted, this __th day of ____, 2013.
KING&SPALDINGLLP
Natasha H. Moffitt
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 8 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
13/72
- 8 -
(Georgia Bar No. 367468)
Laura S. Huffman
(Georgia Bar No. 595909)1180 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3521
Telephone: (404) 572-4600
Facsimile: (404) 572-5134
E-mail: nmoffitt@kslaw.com
E-mail: lhuffman@kslaw.com
Kathleen E. McCarthy
(admittedpro hac vice)
1185 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 556-2345
E-mail: kmccarthy@kslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SPANX, INC.
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 9 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
14/72
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this day, I electronically filed the foregoing
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF with the
Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such
filing to Defendants counsel of record:
Theodore H. Davis Jr.
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
1100 Peachtree StreetSuite 2800
Atlanta, GA 30309
Steven B. Pokotilow
Laura Goldbard George
Binni N. Shah
Stroock Stroock & Lavan
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038-4982
This __th day of _______, 2013.
Natasha H. Moffitt
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 10 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
15/72
Exhibit A
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 11 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
16/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 12 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
17/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 13 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
18/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 14 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
19/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 15 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
20/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 16 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
21/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 17 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
22/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 18 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
23/72
Exhibit B
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 19 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
24/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 20 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
25/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 21 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
26/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 22 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
27/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 23 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
28/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 24 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
29/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 25 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
30/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 26 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
31/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 27 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
32/72
Exhibit C
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 28 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
33/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 29 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
34/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 30 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
35/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 31 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
36/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 32 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
37/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 33 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
38/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 34 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
39/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 35 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
40/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 36 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
41/72
Exhibit D
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 37 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
42/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 38 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
43/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 39 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
44/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 40 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
45/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 41 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
46/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 42 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
47/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 43 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
48/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 44 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
49/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 45 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
50/72
Exhibit E
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 46 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
51/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 47 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
52/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 48 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
53/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 49 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
54/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 50 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
55/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 51 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
56/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 52 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
57/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 53 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
58/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 54 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
59/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 55 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
60/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 56 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
61/72
Exhibit F
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 57 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
62/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 58 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
63/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 59 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
64/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 60 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
65/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 61 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
66/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 62 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
67/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 63 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
68/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 64 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
69/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 65 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
70/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 66 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
71/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 67 of 68
-
8/22/2019 Spanx v. Yummie Tummie - Motion re 2d Am Compl
72/72
Case 1:13-cv-00710-WSD Document 30-1 Filed 07/31/13 Page 68 of 68
top related