special education – solving the mystery together 08/17/07 lori ames, school finance consultant
Post on 25-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Special Education – Special Education – Solving the Mystery Solving the Mystery
TogetherTogether
Special Education – Special Education – Solving the Mystery Solving the Mystery
TogetherTogether
08/17/0708/17/07
Lori Ames, School Finance ConsultantLori Ames, School Finance Consultant
Agenda• Special Education Funding Sources
• Special Education Expense Coding
• State Special Education Categorical Aid
• Adjustments to Aidable Expenses
• Special Education Fiscal Reporting
Special Education Funding Sources
• State Special Education Categorical Aid
• High Cost Categorical Aid
• Federal Special Education Aid
• Medicaid
• State Equalization Aid
• Local Property Tax
State Spec Ed Categorical Aid
• Aidable costs may include, but are not limited to:– Salary/Fringe Benefits for:
• Most Special Education Teachers and Assistants• Speech/Physical/Occupational Therapists• School Psychologists, Social Workers, Guidance
Counselors, and Nurses• Special Education Administrative Staff• Special Transportation
High Cost Categorical Aid
• School districts are eligible for aid if the district incurred, in the previous school year, more than $30,000 of non-administrative costs for providing special education and related services to a child, and those costs are not eligible for reimbursement under the state special education categorical aid program, the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or the federal Medicaid program
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/highcost.html
Federal Special Education Aid/Grants
• The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) originally authorized funding of 40% of average per-pupil expenditures to support special education services for children with disabilities. Most of the funding is distributed to local school districts in the form of flow-through aids or other discretionary grants.
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sped/fedgrant.html
Medicaid
• A fairly small source of revenue for school districts is insurance reimbursement provided through the combined federal/state Medicaid program.
http://dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/medicaid.doc
State Equalization Aid
• Equalization is a state “cost sharing formula” which reduces local district reliance on local property taxes.
• The state shares in most costs incurred by Wisconsin school districts that are not reimbursed by other revenue sources. Eligible costs include special education and related services.
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/equalaid.html
Local Property Tax
• Special Education and related services not reimbursed through one of the programs mentioned above are funded by local property taxes.
• The extent to which local property taxes are used to fund special education costs in a particular district varies greatly and depends largely on the amount of state equalization aids received by the district.
Spec Ed Expense Coding
• All special education expenses, regardless of funding source must be accounted for in fund 27
• The function number and the project number are the most critical elements of the total account code
Special Education Expense Coding
• Function Number– Identifies the special education program
• 152000 – Early Childhood
• 158000 – Cross Categorical
• 156600 – Speech & Language
• 159200 – Substitutes
Spec Ed Expense Coding
• The Business Office and the Special Education Department will need to work closely together to ensure that staff members are being charged to the appropriate program or function.
• Appropriate staff licensure is important when assigning staff to various functions
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/valid_code_se.doc
Project Coding
• The key to identifying the correct project code is ……
……understanding that the project code identifies how the expense is to be ultimately funded.
Project Number – 011
• Use this project on all original object 100 – 900 expenditures when:
– the LEA is using only local dollars to fund the expenditure (no grant money reimbursement)
– the expenditure is directly state special education categorically aidable
Project 011-Aidable Expense Example
• The school district incurs salary & benefit expenses for an appropriately licensed Early Childhood teacher, funded w/ local dollars.
Fund Object Function Project
27 100/200 152000 011
Project Number - 019• Use this project on all original object
100-900 expenditures when:
– the LEA is using only local dollars to fund the expenditure (no grant money reimbursement)
– the expenditure is NOT directly state special education categorically aidable
Project 019-Non-Aidable Expense Example
• The school district purchases supplies for an early childhood program w/local dollars.
Fund Object Function Project
27 410 152000 019
Project Number - 340• Use this appropriate IDEA grant project
code of “341-349” on all original object 100-900 expenditures when:– This expenditure is charged directly to an
IDEA (flow-through, entitlement, etc..) grant.
– The LEA name on the grant is the same as this LEA.
Project 340 Grant Expense Example
• The LEA purchases supplies for an early childhood program that is reimbursed by grant dollars direct to this LEA.
Fund Object Function Project27 410 152000 340
Project Number - 599
• Use this project code on all original object 100-900 expenditures when:
– This expenditure is charged directly to a grant such as AODA, Drug Free, etc….
– The LEA name on the grant is the same as this LEA.
Project 599 Grant Expense Example
• The LEA purchases supplies for an early childhood program that is reimbursed by non-IDEA grant dollars direct to this LEA.
Fund Object Function Project27 410 152000 599
Project Number – 315/317• Use these projects, 315 (State) or 317
(Federal) on all original object 100-900 expenditures when:
– The expenditure is then charged to a state/federal grant of another LEA
– The LEA name on the state/federal grant is another school district (NOT this LEA)
Project 315/317Grant Expense Example
• The LEA purchases supplies for an early childhood program that is reimbursed by another school district using federal grant dollars
Fund Object Function Project27 410 152000 317
Project Number – 515/517
• Use these projects, 515 (State) or 517 (Federal) on all original object 100-900 expenditures when:
– The expenditure is then charged to a state/federal grant.
– The LEA name on the state/federal grant is a “CESA” or a “CCDEB”, NOT this LEA
Project 515/517Grant Expense Example
• The LEA purchases supplies for an early childhood program that is reimbursed by a CESA or CCDEB using federal grant dollars
Fund Object Function Project27 410 152000 517
Project Number - 091
• Use this project on all original object 100-900 expenditures when:
– The LEA is using only local dollars to fund the expenditure (no grant money reimbursement)
– The expenditure is directly reimbursed by a payment from CESA (using CESA local dollars – no grant money)
Project 091 CESA Package Program Example
• The host district of a CESA package program purchases supplies for an early childhood program that is reimbursed w/local dollars by CESA.
Fund Object Function Project27 410 152000 091
Project Number – 092
• Use this project on all original object 100-900 expenditures when:
– The LEA is using only local dollars to fund the expenditure (no grant money reimbursement)
– The expenditure is directly reimbursed by a payment from a CCDEB (using CCDEB local dollars – no grant money)
Project 092 CCDEB Package Program Example
• The host district of a CCDEB package program purchases supplies for an early childhood program that is reimbursed w/local dollars by a CCDEB.Fund Object Function Project
27 410 152000 092
Why is Coding Important?
• DPI uses the account codes to determine aidable expenses and ultimately calculate your district’s state special education categorical aid
How Do I Know If An Expense is Aidable?
• Refer to the “Special Education Categorical Aid Claim Directions” document for definitions of aidable expenses.
http://dpi.wi.gov/sfs/xls/se_claim_directions.xls
Special Education Categorical Aid
• Entities eligible to receive state special education categorical aid:– School Districts
– CESAs
– CCDEBs
– 2R Charter Schools
Special Education Categorical Aid
• Based on the information reported in the special education annual report, the district’s special education categorical aid is calculated
• the aid is paid based on prior year aidable expenditures (aid paid in 2007-08 is based on expenditures from 2006-07)
Special Education Categorical Aid• Categorical aid may be received either
directly or indirectly:
– Direct: Your district receives aid directly from DPI as a result of an expense coded to an 011 project
– Indirect: Your district reimburses another entity with local funds for expenses that the other entity coded to an 011 project. The other entity transits your share of the aid to our district.
Special Education Categorical Aid
• Due to the high amount of eligible expenses, the amount of aid paid is prorated to approximately 29%.
• Aid is paid in multiple payments (Nov 15%, Dec 15%, Jan 15%, Feb 15%, March 15%, and June 25%)
Special Education Fiscal Reporting
• Districts are required to submit both a special education budget and annual report that is currently separate from the full SAFR budget and annual report
• The special education budget/annual program is located on either a staff member’s individual hard drive or on a network drive within the district.
Spec Ed Fiscal Reporting
• District data is entered in the resident program.
• Since the report is not web-based, the district must create a text file containing the data. (part of the program)
• The text file is emailed to:DPIsfsreports@dpi.state.wi.us
Adjustments to Aid Eligible Expenses
• No Valid License – staff members are not appropriately licensed for the program.
• Additional Questioned Cost -
• Inappropriate allocation of salaries/benefits - social workers, psychologists, nursing, and guidance
No Valid License
• PI 1202
– Report filed by district with DPI in fall
– List by staff, FTE, and teaching position
– No updates during the year
No Valid License
• “No Valid License” listing on June 30th
– Identifies staff not properly licensed for the teaching assignment listed on the PI 1202
– Auditor required to report to DPI salaries, benefits, and account structure (even in funds other than 27) for all individuals on “no valid license” listing.
No Valid License
• “No Valid License” listing on June 30th
– When teaching position of an individual was incorrectly reported on PI-1202
• Obtain, for auditor, a written representation from the Special Education Director or other appropriate person stating that the reported assignment (PI-1202) was incorrect. Include previously reported teaching assignment and correct teaching assignment for individual.
No Valid License
• “No Valid License” listing on June 30th
– DPI special education licensing follows up on the licensing status
• May result in phone call to district
– Aid is withheld until DPI special education licensing approves the individual
Additional Questioned Cost
• “Valid License” listing on June 30th
– Available in Reporting Portal
• Auditor performs a payroll test and determines if salary and related benefits are properly reported for staff on the list
Additional Questioned Cost
• Any individual not reported in proper account coding for their teaching assignment (per PI-1202 and valid license list) is:
– Reviewed by Auditor for correct teaching assignment (through inquiry)
• If teaching assignment is in agreement with license – salaries and benefits are moved to appropriate WUFAR accounts (no filing with DPI)
• If teaching assignment is not in agreement with license – salaries and benefits are reported to DPI as questioned cost
Additional Questioned Cost
• DPI special education licensing follows up on the licensing status
– May result in phone call to District
• Aid is withheld until DPI special education licensing approves the individuals
Allocation of Salaries and Benefits to Fund 27
• Salaries and benefits of professionals working in both the regular education and special education areas must be allocated between fund 10 and fund 27 based on time and costs
– School Social Worker– School Psychologist– School Nurses (Registered Nurses, licensed by WI
Department of Regulation and Licensing)– School Counselors
Allocation of Salaries and Benefits to Fund 27
• January 12, 2006 Letter– http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/ltrjan12_06.html– Types of activities that would be eligible for
special education aid– Methodologies in determining time and cost
• Must be done for each individual staff member claimed
• Documentation must be maintained• Must be rational and defensible method of
allocation
Allocation of Salaries and Benefits to fund 27
Special Education
General Ledger Claim FormSocial Worker Function 212000 Function 212000
Project 011
Psychologist Function 215000 Function 215000
Project 011
Nurse Function 214000 Function 299999
Project 019
Guidance Counselor
Function 213000 Function 299999
Project 019
Allocation of Salaries and Benefits to Fund 27
• Identify these costs in the cover e-mail with the upload file attachments as follows:– For (LEA Name), the “011-state aidable” guidance
counselor and school nurse salary/fringe costs reported in function 299 999 under project “019” on the PI 1505SE are:
• School Guidance Counselor– Object 100 – Salary: (Amount)
– Object 200 – Fringes: (Amount)
• School Nurse– Object 100 – Salary: (Amount)
– Object 200 – Fringes: (Amount)
Allocation of Salaries and Benefits to Fund 27
• Included in Auditor payroll test will be individuals from the categories of psychologist, social worker, guidance counselor, and nurse
• Supply auditor with instructions to staff on how to determine what time is aidable
• Provide auditor with documentation of methodology used
Allocation of Salaries and Benefits to fund 27
• Auditor reports to DPI as questioned cost the salaries and benefits of individual in question
• DPI special education licensing follows up on the licensing status
– May result in phone call to District
• Aid is withheld until DPI special education licensing approves the individual
Spec Ed Fiscal Report
• Common Errors in the Special Education Annual Report:
– Spec Ed Annual = SAFR Annual Report– Grant payments and expenses between
entities do not equal.– Deductible receipts are not identified
Spec Ed Annual = SAFR Annual
Spec Ed SAFR
218200.100 21,000 21,000
218200.200 4,200 4,200
218200.300 3,000 2,500
218200.400 800 800
218200.500 1,000 1,000
Total 30,000 29,500
Function total out of balance
Spec Ed Annual = SAFR Annual
Spec Ed SAFR
218200.100 21,000 21,000
218200.200 4,200 4,200
218200.300 3,000 3,800
218200.400 800 0
218200.500 1,000 1,000
Total 30,000 30,000
Object Total out of Balance
Grant Payments Between Entities• Example Assumptions:
– 3rd party grant scenario
– District A incurs the original expense to be reimbursed
– District B is the grant holder
– Federal flow-thru grant
Grant Payments Between Entities
DPI
District A – Incurs Original Vendor Expense - Project 317
VENDOR
District B – Reimburses District A using Federal Flow-Thru Funds –
Project 340
District B files DPI Grant Claim & Receives Reimbursement – Source
730
District A – Receipts Reimbursement-Source 317
Grant Payments Between Entities• On the special education report:
– District A enters nothing but the expense in the appropriate account number, project 317
– District B answers “yes” to paying another LEA for services from a grant, identifies District A, and the amount paid
District A Project 317 =
District A Source 317 = District B Object 340
Grant Payments Between Entities• Example Assumptions:
– 3rd party grant scenario
– District A incurs the original expense to be reimbursed
– CESA is the grant holder
– Federal flow-thru grant
Grant Payments Between Entities
DPI
CESA
District A – Incurs Original Vendor Expense - Project 517
VENDOR
CESA – Reimburses District A using Federal Flow-Thru Funds –
Project 340
CESA files DPI Grant Claim & Receives Reimbursement – Source
730
District A – Receipts Reimbursement-Source 517
Grant Payments Between Entities• On the special education report:
– District A enters nothing but the expense in the appropriate account number, project 517
– CESA answers “yes” to paying another LEA for services from a grant, identifies District A, and the amount paid
District A Project 517 =
District A Source 517 = CESA Object 340
27.000.211.152000.011 27.000.386.436000.019
27.000.110.152000.011
27.000.550.218100.517
27.000.410.221300.599
27.000.310.221300.340
27.000.410.156600.317
27.000.212.152000.011
27.000.220.152000.01127.000.310.156600.515
Special Education ReportSpecial Education Report
But what happens if another entity reimburses your district for an
expense coded to 011 using grant funds?
Not Aidable Aidable
Deductible Receipt• What is a deductible receipt?
– A deductible receipt is created when an entity incurs an aidable expense (coded to project 011) that is ultimately reimbursed by another entity with grant funds.
Deductible Receipt• Why does DPI care about deductible
receipts?
– DPI should not pay special education categorical aid on an aidable expense (coded to project 011) that has been reimbursed with state or federal grant funds.
Deductible Receipt Example
• District A provides Early Childhood services to multiple districts. District B’s share of the program include salary ($400), benefits ($200), and materials ($100). District B reimburses District A using federal grant money.
• District A Expense: 27E.xxx.110.152000.011 $400• District A Expense: 27E.xxx.2xx.152000.011 $200• District A Expense: 27E.xxx.410.152000.019 $100• District A Revenue: 27R.317 $700
Deductible Receipt Example
• On the Special Education Report:– District A:
• Answers “yes” to “did your district receive deductible receipts”
• Identifies District “B” and the amount of the deductible receipt $600
• Enters $600 in 27D152000 000 011
– District B:• Answers “yes” to paying another LEA for
services from a grant, identifies District “A”, and the amount paid ($700)
Deductible Receipt-Open Enrollment
• District A serves the student and bills District B.
– District B pays with local funds only
• Flat Rate – no deductible receipt
• Additional Cost – no deductible receipt
Deductible Receipt-Open Enrollment
• District A serves the student and bills District B.
– District B pays with grant funds
• Flat Rate – no deductible receipt
• Additional Cost – deductible receipt for the portion of the additional cost originally charged by District A to an 011 project number.
Spec Ed Reporting Changes Ahead!
• The finance team is currently in the design phase of creating a new special education fiscal report.
• The goal is to integrate the fund 27 detail with the full SAFR Budget/Annual Report beginning with the 2008-09 Budget Report.
Resources
• WUFAR (full document & expense matrix) http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/wufar.html
• Special Education Transaction Coding
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/sped.doc
• Special Education Claim Directions
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/xls/se_claim_directions.xls
Resources
• Valid Teacher Licenses & Reporting Codes
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/pdf/valid_code_se.pdf
• “Special Education” Pupil Transportation
http://dpi.wi.gov/sfs/xls/setrpl00.xls
• Special Education Media-Site Presentations
http://media2.wi.gov/DPI/Catalog/Front.aspx?cid=2352cf23-e130-4a9c-b83f-8f8e90b15f41
Resources
• Open Enrollment
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/open_enrollment_wufar.doc
• Function 430000http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/funct_430.doc
• Coop Agreement – 66.0301
http://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/coop_agree.html
Resources
• Fiscal Agent Requirementshttp://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/fisagnt.doc
• Fiscal Agent Agreement Account Codinghttp://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/xls/fisagagree.xls
• Fiscal Agent-Example of Level 3 Documentationhttp://www.dpi.wi.gov/sfs/doc/fisagnt_example.doc
top related