supporting life scientists via end user programming luke church computer laboratory, university of...

Post on 27-Mar-2015

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Supporting Life Scientists via End User Programming

Luke ChurchComputer Laboratory, University of Cambridge

Microsoft eScience - Dec ‘08

With thanks to co-authors:

Agenda

End User Programming (EUP)– What is it?– How is it being used?

Supporting Scientists• 1: Usability

– Applying EUP to improve our tools– State of the art: Cognitive Dimensions of Notations

• 2: Executable Biology: Life as Computation– Successes– Challenge: ‘natural abstractions’

End User Programming?

DirectManipulation

Programming

Actions on objectsActions on lots of objectsActions when I’m not hereCommunicating intent

Abstraction

Mainstream Usability

Professional Programmers

End User Programming

End Users

Power, Expressiveness, Communication

Current UI paradigm

End Users Can Program

A few million users...

Given the right problem and tools

End Users Can ProgramGiven the right problem and tools

End Users Can ProgramGiven the right problem and tools

(From http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-02-10.html)

End Users Can ProgramGiven the right problem and tools

Why give EUP a name?

• Programming is a different cognitive task– Direct Manipulation usability methods don’t help much

Reasonable from a direct manipulation perspective

But has Hidden Dependencies poor Provisionality poor Progressive Evaluation etc.

Why give EUP a name?

• Programming is a different cognitive task– EUP analysis tools acknowledge this

• By understanding that something is programming• Improved design discussions

• Text or graphics?• Impact of type systems?

• More appropriate usability techniques• Cognitive Dimensions of Notations• Attention Investment Framework• User Experience of Intentional Information

EUP for life Scientists1: Usability

Modelling tools

• A particular type of programming language– We used analytical EUP techniques to improve usability– Small user study showed a good provisional result

– Prototype now in refinement

Cognitive Dimensions

• State of the art usability technique– Consider an environment, along a number of dimensions

– How defuse is the information?– How viscous is it?– How many abstractions does the user have to learn?– Does the user have to prematurely commit to a structure?

– Highlight areas of likely problems, suggest design manoeuvres

Cognitive Dimensions

Successes

• Identify and fix deep usability problems

• Academically verified and supported• 50+ extension papers, widely cited within community• Theoretical testing, practical adoption• Workshops, tutorials, handbook in progress

• Increasing adoption• Scientific tools• API design at Microsoft’s• Security usability• Spreadsheet UI design• ...

EUP for life Scientists2: Executable Biology

Executable Biology

• Executable models of living processes

Compare predictions to data

Suggest new experiments

Adjust model

Executable Biology

• Successes– Experimentally verified refinements in regulatory models of

various organisms– Proposed new concurrency models to reflect biological

processes– Successful application of formal verification techniques to

laboratory data

• Challenges– Challenges laboratory practice around timed measurements in

experiments– Develop computational models that are more suitable for

biological modelling

Executable Biology

• New Abstractions?– Need for abstraction processes that work with biology– Translucent, socially supported, computationally tractable

– Abstraction problem in computers, let alone biology– Possibility for great mutual benefit

• What does it mean to understand a program?– Pragmatic computationalism, it is useful to consider: life

computational model

– What does it mean to ‘understand’ a program independent of a goal?

On Abstraction...

• Abstraction carries Intention– Classifications/Abstractions are a shaping perspective

– E.g. International Classification of Disease

– Abstracting biological systems => shaping what we can know– What questions are interesting?

– Traditionally decided by the scientific community

• Accelerating time to discovery?– We are deciding what questions are answerable

– Adoption requires supporting social processes– Responsibility to make answers useful

Summary

• Usability• Usability is crucial to adoption and efficiency• Standard techniques: necessary but not sufficient• End User Programming techniques help

• Executable Biology• Pragmatic computationalism• Understand living systems like programs, positive initial results• Deeper challenges• What does biology mean by understand?• Provide new abstraction processes, with social support

Accelerating discovery by providing new ways of thinking about biological systems

top related