the minnesota accountable health model•steering team formation (january 2017) •data collection...
Post on 17-Oct-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18, 20179:00 AM - 12:00 PM
S H O R E V I E W C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R | 4 5 8 0 V I C TO R I A S T. N . , S H O R E V I E W, M N 5 5 1 2 6
The Minnesota Accountable
Health Model
Joint Community Advisory and Multi-
Payer Alignment Task Force Meeting
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
2
• Welcome and Overview of Agenda
• Updates
• Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-Related Initiatives
• Next Steps / Future Meetings
• Public Comment
Agenda
Minnesota SIM Driver Diagram3
Infographic
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
5
UPDATES
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Updates (slide 1 of 2)
• CMMI Request for Information (RFI) Results
• Evaluation
• Resources – Roadmaps & Toolkits
o E- Health podcast
o E- Health Roadmap
o Emerging Professions Toolkit
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Updates (slide 2 of 2)
• 2017 SIM Funded Grant Opportunities
• Save the Date: 2017 MN e-Health Summit
o Connectivity. Equity. Health.
o June 15, 2017
o Earl Brown Heritage Center, Brooklyn Center
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
8
SUSTAINABILITY AND EVOLUTION OF SIM-RELATED
INITIATIVES
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives:
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives: Community Engagement
• Outcomes from Health Equity Summit
o Visual Meeting Summary
o Call to Action Pledge Form
• Recent Findings from Evaluation
• Upcoming Opportunities
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Topics:
• Community Engagement
• eHealth Use and Data Exchange
• Payment & Care Delivery Reform
• National Perspective
Questions for Each Topic:
• What are member organizations focusing on in 2017 and beyond in this arena?
• Are there specific topics, within this arena, that are of interest for future panel speakers or networking opportunities?
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives– DISCUSSION (1)
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives:
eHEALTH USE AND DATA EXCHANGE
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives: eHealth Use and Data Exchange
• Consent RFI
• HIE Study
• HIO Connectivity
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Consent RFI - Overview
• Assessment of the costs and patient impact associated with the Minnesota consent requirements for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations (Minnesota Health Records Act)
• Due February 2017 to legislature
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Consent RFI – Patient Themes
Patients:• Do not agree on the positive or negative impact of the
Minnesota Health Records Act
• Have varied experiences relating to the “cost” of providing consent for sharing their health information
• Have varied opinions on how their personal health information should be controlled and used
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Consent RFI – Provider Themes
Providers report:
• Negative impact on patient care
• Patient burden
• Patients frustrated; providers confused
• Requirements run contrary to patient expectations
• Processes to obtain consent vary widely
• Most patients do provide consent
• Preference to align with HIPAA
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Consent RFI – Considerations and Implications
• It will be difficult for Minnesota to achieve its health reform goals due to varied interpretations of the MHRA
• Some clarifications to operationalize the current MHRA are needed
• Education, resources and legal assistance are needed by providers and patients
• Implementing the MHRA often require a manual process for obtaining patient consent outside of the EHR
• The MHRA does not adequately support the majority of patients whose preference is to share their health information
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
HIE Study - Overview
• Assess Minnesota’s legal, financial, and regulatory framework for HIE, including the requirements of the MN Health Records Act
• Make recommendations for modifications that would strengthen the ability of MN health care providers to:o securely exchange data
o in compliance with patient preferences, and
o in a way that is efficient and financially sustainable
• Due February 2018
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
HIE Study – High Level Timeline
• Steering Team formation (January 2017)
• Data collection (March – June 2017)o Focus groups, interviews, environmental scan, workgroups
• Recommendations development (June – August 2017)
• Recommendations validation (August – October 2017)
• Report finalization (December 2017)
• Report submission (February 2018)
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Health Information Organization (HIO): an organization that oversees, governs, and facilitates HIE among health care providers that are not related health care entities to improve coordination of patient care and the efficiency of health care delivery.
Current State-Certified HIOs
HIO Development – State-Certified HIOs
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
HIO Development – HIO to HIO Connectivity
Short term
• Confirming HIO participation in ELR and immunization data exchange with MDH
• Discussing priorities for interoperability in 2017
o Patient matching specifications
o Healthcare directory
o Patient directory
o Public health specifications (ELR, immunizations)
Long term - Discussing proposed Shared Services Bus model toward MN statewide HIE strategy; other based on HIE study
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Topics:
• Community Engagement
• eHealth Use and Data Exchange
• Payment & Care Delivery Reform
• National Perspective
Questions for Each Topic:
• What are member organizations focusing on in 2017 and beyond in this arena?
• Are there specific topics, within this arena, that are of interest for future panel speakers or networking opportunities?
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives– DISCUSSION (2)
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Break
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives:
PAYMENT & CARE DELIVERY REFORM
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
• Eligible recipients
o Non-dual, under-65, across both FFS and all Medicaid MCO enrollees
o Attributed using past encounters/claims
• Provider requirements
o Voluntary contracts under model options “Virtual” (shared savings only) and “Integrated” (negotiated gain/loss sharing) based on size and structure
o Flexibility in governance structure and care models
• Payment and quality model
o Defined core set of services, IHP may elect to include additional services
o Existing payments persist with gain-/loss-sharing payments made annually based on risk-adjusted TCOC performance, contingent on quality performance (SQRMS)
• Provider supports
o Data analytics and reporting feedback (monthly and quarterly files)
o Learning collaboratives
IHP Model Components
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
99,107
145,869
204,119
375,924
462,698
$14,825,352
$65,339,161
$76,662,498
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
$80,000,000
$90,000,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
MN Integrated Health Partnerships Growth & Savings
Enrollees Annual Savings
ACOs = 6 ACOs = 9 ACOs = 16 ACOs = 19 ACOs = 21
IHP Successes: Participant Growth and Savings
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
How’s it going? RFI & Other Stakeholders
Helps accelerate care delivery innovations that had already begun, such as movement towards team-based care, community partnerships, a “super-utilizer” focus, etc.
BUT… Long-term sustainability is an open question.
Data and reports have been essential, providing a “source of truth” and a view of patients not readily available elsewhere.
BUT… Data rich, but sometimes still information poor.
Flexibility of model is key - every population is different; everything is local.
BUT… Not all provider models fit well into the current demonstration.
Partnerships are critical to the success of the model longer term – pushing IHPs to reach out to unaffiliated providers and community partners is important.
BUT… Partnerships tend to be informal in nature, and there isn’t a formal mechanism
to ensure partners are involved in the value arrangement and risk models.
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
What’s Next? - IHP 2.0 Key Design Elements
• Include a population-based prospective care coordination payment.
• Support exchange of electronic clinical event notifications between IHPs and providers.
• Incorporate IHP contract incentives that strengthen partnerships with community supports and social service organizations.
• Ensure a “no risk” track for IHPs that are not able to take on risk, but are still accountable for patient care.
• Develop an advanced track where higher capacity systems can take on increased accountability for patient population health outcomes.
• Strengthen alignment between HCH and IHP, MACRA, other programs.
Health Care Homes Transform Care and Lives of 3.9 Million Minnesotans
Review:•Brief history of Health Care Homes (HCH)
•HCH best practices
•HCH program outcomes
•Alignment and Future direction
Objectives
• Centerpieces of Minnesota’s 2008 health reform initiative.
• Focus is on redesign of primary care delivery
• Meaningful engagement of patients in their care.
Health Care HomesBackground
• Voluntary program – no cost to certify
• Recertification every 3 years
• 415 clinics certified overall
• 376 currently certified (20 border state clinics)
• 3,660 certified primary care clinicians and their teams
HCH Certification
91
162
226
326
361376
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Certified HCH Totals: 2011 - 2016
Before Health Care Homes•Patients are recipients of health care
•Patients make appointments.
•Care is determined by current problem and time available.
•Patients are responsible to coordinate their own care.
•High quality care is delivered because well trained.
•It’s up to the patient to tell us what happened to them.
•Clinical operations center on meeting the doctor’s needs.
Health Care Homes•Patients and families are partners in their healthcare.
•Care Coordinator works directly with patients.
•Proactive care planning.
•Care is standardized with evidence-based guidelines and planned visits.
•A multidisciplinary team works at the top of their licenses to coordinate care.
•Improved quality outcomes through measurement.
•Visits, tests and follow-up care is tracked.
What’s different
• Inter-professional team.
• Engage patients as part of the quality improvement.
• Expanding partnerships beyond the walls of the clinic (current standards require only 1 community partner).
• Improve structure through certification requirements.
• Transformation to a Health Care Home provides a strong primary care foundation for:o Alternative payment models
o ACH’s
Health Care Homes Best Practices
HCH vs. Non-HCHs:
• Improved quality for Asthma, Vascular Care, Diabetes, Depression and Colorectal measures.
• 9 percent less expensive
• Fewer hospitalizations with lower costs
• Over a five year evaluation period, spending for Medicaid, Medicare and Dual Eligible patients was approximately $1 billion less - did not take into account other initiatives
Five Year HCH Program Evaluation Key Findings
256B.0753 PAYMENT for Care Coordination
•Develop a payment system that provides per-person care coordination payments to certified health care homes under section 256B.0751 for providing care coordination services and directly managing on-site or employing care coordinators
•Care coordination payment system must vary the fees paid by care complexity, with the highest fees being paid for care provided to individuals requiring the most intensive care coordination.
•Health plan companies shall develop payment conditions and terms for the care coordination fee for health care homes participating in their network in a manner that is consistent with the system developed under section 256B.0753 (62U.02)
Payment for Care Coordination
Future Direction
Health Care Homes a Strong Foundation
• Strengthen meaningful partnerships
• Align with emerging state and federal models for value-based or alternative payment
• Support financial sustainability of HCH clinics by moving towards value-based payment and providing support for community/clinic partnerships.
Health Care Homes Request For Information Ideas for Program Enhancements
•Support the secure exchange of clinical information with a wide range of partners.
•Simplify administrative processes for certification and recertification and requirements for learning collaborative participation.
•Establish health disparity reduction and health equity goals
Health Care Homes Request For Information
We are on the right path!• Value based payment
• Community partnerships
• Health equity
• Learning support and technical assistance
Key challenges• Reimbursement and financial sustainability
• Data exchange and health information management
• Incentives for community partnerships
Request For Information: Key Findings
Feedback indicates top barrier to successful implementation of the HCH model are challenges around billing and reimbursement.
• Clinic level changes necessary to meet certification standards, and maintaining those changes, requires adequate reimbursement and other means of support.
• Enhancements to HCH standards - promoting clinic-community partnerships and addressing social determinants of health will need effective strategies for long-term viability.
Financial Sustainability
Resources
Background/Reports/Statutes:• http://www.health.state.mn.us/healthreform/homes/background/index.ht
ml
Certification Resources:• http://www.health.state.mn.us/healthreform/homes/certification/index.ht
ml
Evaluation Reports: • http://www.health.state.mn.us/healthreform/homes/outcomes/eval
uationreport.html
Request for Information:• http://www.health.state.mn.us/healthreform/homes/newsannounce
ments.html
Bonnie LaPlanteDirector, Health Care Homes
651-201-3744Bonnie.LaPlante@state.mn.us
Contact Information
• What are the best approaches to promoting and providing alignment between payers?
• What key points would need to be addressed to make a compelling case for “payment alignment”?
• What would the steps be to make it happen?
Questions for Taskforce
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Topics:
• Community Engagement
• eHealth Use and Data Exchange
• Payment & Care Delivery Reform
• National Perspective
Questions for Each Topic:
• What are member organizations focusing on in 2017 and beyond in this arena?
• Are there specific topics, within this arena, that are of interest for future panel speakers or networking opportunities?
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives– DISCUSSION (3)
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Sources of information: https://qpp.cms.gov/ ; https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs/MACRA-Quality-Payment-Program-webinar-slides-10-26-16.pdf; https://www.advisory.com/research/physician-practice-roundtable/members/expert-insights/2016/nine-faqs-on-provider-payment-under-macra; and http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/12/12/building-a-system-that-works-the-future-of-health-care/
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives:
NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE FOR TRANSFORMING HEALTH CARE
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
• Millions uninsured
• Avoidable errors
• Health care costs outpacing the rest of the economy
• Payment system that rewards volume
http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/12/12/building-a-system-that-works-the-future-of-health-care/
National Framework for Transforming Health Care: The Challenge
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/12/12/building-a-system-that-works-the-future-of-health-care/
Change the Way We Pay
• Reward the value of care and patient outcomes rather than the quantity of services
Improve Care Delivery
• Promote coordination
• Prioritize wellness and prevention
• Give health care leaders the flexibility to innovate
Unlock Health Care Date and Information
• Use common standards to ensure portability
• Allow patients to access their own electronic health information
• Ensure that rules allow data to move simply and securely
National Framework for Transforming Health Care: The Strategy
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Medicare Access and CHIP Re-Authorization Act (MACRA)
Repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
• SGR was used by CMS to control Medicare spending on clinician services and is based on the growth of federal spending for Medicare services
• However, SGR exceeded the sustainable growth rate target nearly every year since 2002
Changes the approach to Medicare clinician payment
• Locks in provider payment rates at near zero growth
Creates the Quality Payment Program (QPP) with two payment tracks
• Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)
• Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APM)
• Starting in 2019, yearly payment adjustments differ for each payment track
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
• 2017 is the performance year CMS will use to determine clinician payment adjustments in 2019
• Clinician payment will not be impacted until January 1, 2019
MACRA Timeline
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Topics:
• Community Engagement
• eHealth Use and Data Exchange
• Payment & Care Delivery Reform
• National Perspective
Questions for Each Topic:
• What are member organizations focusing on in 2017 and beyond in this arena?
• Are there specific topics, within this arena, that are of interest for future panel speakers or networking opportunities?
Sustainability and Evolution of SIM-related Initiatives– DISCUSSION (4)
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
56
NEXT STEPS / FUTURE MEETINGS
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
The Next Meeting
Final Community Advisory and
Multi-Payer Alignment
Joint Task Force Meeting
Wednesday, April 19, 2017 | 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Wilder Center | 451 Lexington Pkwy N, St Paul, MN 55104
57
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
59
PUBLIC COMMENT
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Task Forces• Jennifer Lundblad (JLundblad@stratishealth.org), CATF Chair
• Garrett Black (Garrett.Black@bluecrossmn.com), MPTF Chair
• Diane Rydrych (Diane.Rydrych@state.mn.us), MDH
• Jennifer Blanchard (Jennifer.Blanchard@state.mn.us), DHS
• Krista O’Connor (Krista.Oconnor@state.mn.us), DHS
Facilitation Team• Greg Howe (ghowe@chcs.org)
• Diane Stollenwerk (diane@stollenwerks.com)
Task Force Contact Information
60
Information: SIM MN Website, www.mn.gov/sim
Contact: SIM MN Email, sim@state.mn.us
Minnesota Accountable Health Model
Public Website
www.mn.gov/sim
61
top related