the time for high speed rail

Post on 20-May-2015

532 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

The Time for High Speed Rail(250km/h+)(250km/h+)

A Frecciarossa high-speed train at Milan's Central Station

Michael CharlesSouthern Cross University

Program Leader, Economic, Social & Environmental SustainabilityCRC f R il I tiCRC for Rail Innovation

Brett HughesAustralasian Railway Association

Program Chair, Economic, Social & Environmental SustainabilityCRC for Rail Innovation

1111Established and Supported under Australia’s Established and Supported under Australia’s Cooperative Research Centres ProgrammeCooperative Research Centres Programme

OutlineOutline

Background to research

Research findings

Future action

2222

HSR definedHSR defined

Speeds: 250 km/h+km/h+

Infrastructure formsforms

Requirements

33

HSR applications worldwideHSR applications worldwide

J Shi k (1964)Japan: Shinkansen (1964)

Europe: TGV (1981) and others

Global expansion: boom period

44

Why research now?Why research now?

Different context

Public interest

Environmentalconcernsconcerns

Overseas successOverseas success

55

HSR Enablers in AustraliaHSR Enablers in Australia

P liti l i t tPolitical interest

N ti l t tNational transport policy calls

Sustainability

Increasingcapacitycapacity

Mature technology66

Mature technology

HSR Barriers in AustraliaHSR Barriers in Australia

CompetingCompeting infrastructure initiatives

Legacy of federalism

R l t t i tReluctance to invest taxpayer funding

Lack of planning coordination

Affordability of other modes

77

Outcomes: Infrastructure i iprovision

N ti b ildiNation-building overseas

Public-privatePublic private partnerships

Innovative ownership and financing models

88

Outcomes: HSR vs. airOutcomes: HSR vs. air

HSR iHSR can win passengers over from air

“4-hour4 hourrule”

Workinggtogether

99

Outcomes: urban issuesOutcomes: urban issues

C iti lit fCriticality of station location

Interconnect-Interconnectivity

Shared or stand-alone infrastructure?

1010

Outcomes: non-commercial b fitbenefits

E h dEnhanced energy security

Reduced GHGs in operationoperation

Reduced airportReduced airport congestion

Reduced external costs

1111

Critical success factorsCritical success factors

St i iStrong vision

Demonstrated capacity issues

Demonstrated wider benefits

Understanding network effects

Competing with air

1212

Most importantly of allMost importantly of all

T t it th dTreat it as another mode

Needs to beoptimum

Avoid lowest-Avoid lowestcost

Planning is everything

1313

Complementing, not il tinecessarily competing

1414

CRC for Rail Innovation R tReports

Stay tuned

First in December 2009: St t i I f tiStrategic Information

Second early 2010: Non-economic Benefitseconomic Benefits

1515

Next stepsNext steps

T l d d j tiTravel demand projections

Corridor protectionCorridor protection

Financial and economic analysisFinancial and economic analysis

Operational and technology issuesOperational and technology issues

Environmental and demographicEnvironmental and demographic issues

1616

Thank youThank you

For q estions/comments regardingFor questions/comments regarding our HSR research:

Email michael charles@scu.edu.auTel. 07 5506 9383

Email bhughes@ara.net.auTel 08 6270 4508Tel. 08 6270 4508

17171717

top related