today’s outline - october 19, 2016csrri.iit.edu/~segre/phys570/16f/lecture_16.pdf · today’s...
Post on 31-May-2020
6 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Today’s Outline - October 19, 2016
• Final presentation
• Ewald sphere (continued)
• Modulated Structures
• Crystal Truncation Rods
• Diffuse Scattering
• Debye-Waller factor
Homework Assignment #04:Chapter 4: 2, 4, 6, 7, 10due Monday, October 24, 2016
Homework Assignment #05:Chapter 5: 1, 3, 7, 9, 10due Wednesday, November 2, 2016
No class on Wednesday, November 9, 2016
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 1 / 16
Final presentation
1 Choose paper for presentation
2 Clear it with me!
3 Do some background research on the technique
4 Prepare a 15 minute presentation
5 Be ready for questions!
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 2 / 16
Final presentation
1 Choose paper for presentation
2 Clear it with me!
3 Do some background research on the technique
4 Prepare a 15 minute presentation
5 Be ready for questions!
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 2 / 16
Final presentation
1 Choose paper for presentation
2 Clear it with me!
3 Do some background research on the technique
4 Prepare a 15 minute presentation
5 Be ready for questions!
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 2 / 16
Final presentation
1 Choose paper for presentation
2 Clear it with me!
3 Do some background research on the technique
4 Prepare a 15 minute presentation
5 Be ready for questions!
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 2 / 16
Final presentation
1 Choose paper for presentation
2 Clear it with me!
3 Do some background research on the technique
4 Prepare a 15 minute presentation
5 Be ready for questions!
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 2 / 16
Ewald sphere & the reciprocal lattice
a*1
a*2
The reciprocal lattice isdefined by the unit vec-tors ~a∗1 and ~a∗2.
The key parameter is therelative orientation of theincident wave vector ~k
As the crystal is rotatedwith respect to the inci-dent beam, the reciprocallattice also rotates
When the Ewald sphere intersects a reciprocal lattice point there will be adiffraction peak in the direction of the scattered x-rays. The diffractionvector, ~Q, is thus a reciprocal lattice vector
~Ghlk = h~a∗1 + k~a∗2
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 3 / 16
Ewald sphere & the reciprocal lattice
The reciprocal lattice isdefined by the unit vec-tors ~a∗1 and ~a∗2.
The key parameter is therelative orientation of theincident wave vector ~k
As the crystal is rotatedwith respect to the inci-dent beam, the reciprocallattice also rotates
When the Ewald sphere intersects a reciprocal lattice point there will be adiffraction peak in the direction of the scattered x-rays. The diffractionvector, ~Q, is thus a reciprocal lattice vector
~Ghlk = h~a∗1 + k~a∗2
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 3 / 16
Ewald sphere & the reciprocal lattice
The reciprocal lattice isdefined by the unit vec-tors ~a∗1 and ~a∗2.
The key parameter is therelative orientation of theincident wave vector ~k
As the crystal is rotatedwith respect to the inci-dent beam, the reciprocallattice also rotates
When the Ewald sphere intersects a reciprocal lattice point there will be adiffraction peak in the direction of the scattered x-rays. The diffractionvector, ~Q, is thus a reciprocal lattice vector
~Ghlk = h~a∗1 + k~a∗2
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 3 / 16
Ewald sphere & the reciprocal lattice
The reciprocal lattice isdefined by the unit vec-tors ~a∗1 and ~a∗2.
The key parameter is therelative orientation of theincident wave vector ~k
As the crystal is rotatedwith respect to the inci-dent beam, the reciprocallattice also rotates
When the Ewald sphere intersects a reciprocal lattice point there will be adiffraction peak in the direction of the scattered x-rays.
The diffractionvector, ~Q, is thus a reciprocal lattice vector
~Ghlk = h~a∗1 + k~a∗2
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 3 / 16
Ewald sphere & the reciprocal lattice
The reciprocal lattice isdefined by the unit vec-tors ~a∗1 and ~a∗2.
The key parameter is therelative orientation of theincident wave vector ~k
As the crystal is rotatedwith respect to the inci-dent beam, the reciprocallattice also rotates
When the Ewald sphere intersects a reciprocal lattice point there will be adiffraction peak in the direction of the scattered x-rays. The diffractionvector, ~Q, is thus a reciprocal lattice vector
~Ghlk = h~a∗1 + k~a∗2
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 3 / 16
Ewald sphere & the reciprocal lattice
The reciprocal lattice isdefined by the unit vec-tors ~a∗1 and ~a∗2.
The key parameter is therelative orientation of theincident wave vector ~k
As the crystal is rotatedwith respect to the inci-dent beam, the reciprocallattice also rotates
When the Ewald sphere intersects a reciprocal lattice point there will be adiffraction peak in the direction of the scattered x-rays. The diffractionvector, ~Q, is thus a reciprocal lattice vector
~Ghlk = h~a∗1 + k~a∗2C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 3 / 16
Ewald construction
It is often more con-venient to visualize theEwald sphere by keep-ing the reciprocal latticefixed and “rotating” theincident beam to visual-ize the scattering geome-try.
In directions of ~k ′ (detec-tor position) where thereis no reciprocal latticepoint, there can be nodiffraction peak.
If the crystal is rotated slightly with respect to the incident beam, ~k , theremay be no Bragg reflections possible at all.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 4 / 16
Ewald construction
It is often more con-venient to visualize theEwald sphere by keep-ing the reciprocal latticefixed and “rotating” theincident beam to visual-ize the scattering geome-try.
In directions of ~k ′ (detec-tor position) where thereis no reciprocal latticepoint, there can be nodiffraction peak.
If the crystal is rotated slightly with respect to the incident beam, ~k , theremay be no Bragg reflections possible at all.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 4 / 16
Ewald construction
It is often more con-venient to visualize theEwald sphere by keep-ing the reciprocal latticefixed and “rotating” theincident beam to visual-ize the scattering geome-try.
In directions of ~k ′ (detec-tor position) where thereis no reciprocal latticepoint, there can be nodiffraction peak.
If the crystal is rotated slightly with respect to the incident beam, ~k , theremay be no Bragg reflections possible at all.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 4 / 16
Polychromatic radiation
If ∆~k is large enough,there may be more thanone reflection lying onthe Ewald sphere.
With an area detector,there may then be multi-ple reflections appearingfor a particular orienta-tion (very common withprotein crystals wherethe unit cell is verylarge).
In protein crystallography, the area detector is in a fixed location withrespect to the incident beam and the crystal is rotated on a spindle so thatas Laue conditions are met, spots are produced on the detector at thediffraction angle
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 5 / 16
Polychromatic radiation
If ∆~k is large enough,there may be more thanone reflection lying onthe Ewald sphere.
With an area detector,there may then be multi-ple reflections appearingfor a particular orienta-tion (very common withprotein crystals wherethe unit cell is verylarge).
In protein crystallography, the area detector is in a fixed location withrespect to the incident beam and the crystal is rotated on a spindle so thatas Laue conditions are met, spots are produced on the detector at thediffraction angle
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 5 / 16
Polychromatic radiation
If ∆~k is large enough,there may be more thanone reflection lying onthe Ewald sphere.
With an area detector,there may then be multi-ple reflections appearingfor a particular orienta-tion (very common withprotein crystals wherethe unit cell is verylarge).
In protein crystallography, the area detector is in a fixed location withrespect to the incident beam and the crystal is rotated on a spindle so thatas Laue conditions are met, spots are produced on the detector at thediffraction angle
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 5 / 16
Multiple scattering
If more than one recipro-cal lattice point is on theEwald sphere, scatteringcan occur internal to thecrystal.
The xrays are first scat-tered along ~kint thenalong the reciprocal lat-tice vector which con-nects the two points onthe Ewald sphere, ~G andto the detector at ~k ′.
This is the cause of monochromator glitches which sometimes removeintensity but can also add intensity to the reflection the detector is set tomeasure.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 6 / 16
Multiple scattering
If more than one recipro-cal lattice point is on theEwald sphere, scatteringcan occur internal to thecrystal.
The xrays are first scat-tered along ~kint
thenalong the reciprocal lat-tice vector which con-nects the two points onthe Ewald sphere, ~G andto the detector at ~k ′.
This is the cause of monochromator glitches which sometimes removeintensity but can also add intensity to the reflection the detector is set tomeasure.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 6 / 16
Multiple scattering
If more than one recipro-cal lattice point is on theEwald sphere, scatteringcan occur internal to thecrystal.
The xrays are first scat-tered along ~kint thenalong the reciprocal lat-tice vector which con-nects the two points onthe Ewald sphere, ~G
andto the detector at ~k ′.
This is the cause of monochromator glitches which sometimes removeintensity but can also add intensity to the reflection the detector is set tomeasure.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 6 / 16
Multiple scattering
If more than one recipro-cal lattice point is on theEwald sphere, scatteringcan occur internal to thecrystal.
The xrays are first scat-tered along ~kint thenalong the reciprocal lat-tice vector which con-nects the two points onthe Ewald sphere, ~G andto the detector at ~k ′.
This is the cause of monochromator glitches which sometimes removeintensity but can also add intensity to the reflection the detector is set tomeasure.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 6 / 16
Multiple scattering
If more than one recipro-cal lattice point is on theEwald sphere, scatteringcan occur internal to thecrystal.
The xrays are first scat-tered along ~kint thenalong the reciprocal lat-tice vector which con-nects the two points onthe Ewald sphere, ~G andto the detector at ~k ′.
This is the cause of monochromator glitches which sometimes removeintensity but can also add intensity to the reflection the detector is set tomeasure.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 6 / 16
Laue diffraction
The Laue diffractiontechnique uses a widerange of radiation from~kmin to ~kmax
These define two Ewaldspheres and a volumebetween them such thatany reciprocal latticepoint which lies inthe volume will meetthe Laue condition forreflection.
This technique is useful for taking data on crystals which are changing ormay degrade in the beam with a single shot of x-rays on a 2D detector.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 7 / 16
Laue diffraction
The Laue diffractiontechnique uses a widerange of radiation from~kmin to ~kmax
These define two Ewaldspheres and a volumebetween them such thatany reciprocal latticepoint which lies inthe volume will meetthe Laue condition forreflection.
This technique is useful for taking data on crystals which are changing ormay degrade in the beam with a single shot of x-rays on a 2D detector.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 7 / 16
Laue diffraction
The Laue diffractiontechnique uses a widerange of radiation from~kmin to ~kmax
These define two Ewaldspheres and a volumebetween them such thatany reciprocal latticepoint which lies inthe volume will meetthe Laue condition forreflection.
This technique is useful for taking data on crystals which are changing ormay degrade in the beam with a single shot of x-rays on a 2D detector.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 7 / 16
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 8 / 16
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 9 / 16
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 10 / 16
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 11 / 16
Diffraction from a Truncated Surface
For an infinite sample, the diffractionspots are infinitesimally sharp.
With finite sample size, these spotsgrow in extent and become more dif-fuse.
If the sample is cleaved and left withflat surface, the diffraction will spreadinto rods perpendicular to the surface.
The scattering intensity can be ob-tained by treating the charge distri-bution as a convolution of an infinitesample with a step function in the z-direction.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 12 / 16
Diffraction from a Truncated Surface
For an infinite sample, the diffractionspots are infinitesimally sharp.
With finite sample size, these spotsgrow in extent and become more dif-fuse.
If the sample is cleaved and left withflat surface, the diffraction will spreadinto rods perpendicular to the surface.
The scattering intensity can be ob-tained by treating the charge distri-bution as a convolution of an infinitesample with a step function in the z-direction.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 12 / 16
Diffraction from a Truncated Surface
For an infinite sample, the diffractionspots are infinitesimally sharp.
With finite sample size, these spotsgrow in extent and become more dif-fuse.
If the sample is cleaved and left withflat surface, the diffraction will spreadinto rods perpendicular to the surface.
The scattering intensity can be ob-tained by treating the charge distri-bution as a convolution of an infinitesample with a step function in the z-direction.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 12 / 16
Diffraction from a Truncated Surface
For an infinite sample, the diffractionspots are infinitesimally sharp.
With finite sample size, these spotsgrow in extent and become more dif-fuse.
If the sample is cleaved and left withflat surface, the diffraction will spreadinto rods perpendicular to the surface.
The scattering intensity can be ob-tained by treating the charge distri-bution as a convolution of an infinitesample with a step function in the z-direction.
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 12 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
CTR Scattering Factor
The scattering amplitude FCTR along a crystal truncation rod is given bysumming an infinite stack of atomic layers, each with scattering amplitudeA(~Q).
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3=
A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
this sum has been discussed previ-ously and gives
or, in terms of the momentumtransfer along the z-axis,Qz = 2πl/a3
since the intensity is the square of the scattering factor
ICTR =∣∣∣FCTR
∣∣∣2 =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
(1 − e i2πl) (1 − e−i2πl)=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl)
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 13 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Dependence on Q
When l is an integer (meeting the Laue condition), the scattering factor isinfinite but just off this value, the scattering factor can be computed byletting Qz = qz + 2π/a3, with qz small.
ICTR =
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (Qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (πl + qza3/2)
=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4 sin2 (qza3/2)
≈
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
4(qza3/2)2=
∣∣∣A(~Q)∣∣∣2
q2za23
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 14 / 16
Absorption Effect
Absorption effects can be included as well by adding a term for each layerpenetrated
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3je−βj
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3e−β
This removes the infinity andincreases the scattering profileof the crystal truncation rod
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 15 / 16
Absorption Effect
Absorption effects can be included as well by adding a term for each layerpenetrated
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3j
e−βj
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3e−β
This removes the infinity andincreases the scattering profileof the crystal truncation rod
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 15 / 16
Absorption Effect
Absorption effects can be included as well by adding a term for each layerpenetrated
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3je−βj
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3e−β
This removes the infinity andincreases the scattering profileof the crystal truncation rod
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 15 / 16
Absorption Effect
Absorption effects can be included as well by adding a term for each layerpenetrated
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3je−βj
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3e−β
This removes the infinity andincreases the scattering profileof the crystal truncation rod
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 15 / 16
Absorption Effect
Absorption effects can be included as well by adding a term for each layerpenetrated
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3je−βj
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3e−β
This removes the infinity andincreases the scattering profileof the crystal truncation rod
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
β=0.2
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 15 / 16
Absorption Effect
Absorption effects can be included as well by adding a term for each layerpenetrated
FCTR = A(~Q)∞∑j=0
e iQza3je−βj
=A(~Q)
1 − e iQza3e−β
This removes the infinity andincreases the scattering profileof the crystal truncation rod 10
-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
β=0.2
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 15 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3
This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3
This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
z0=+0.05
z0=-0.05
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
Density Effect
The CTR profile is sensitive to the termination of the surface. This makesit an ideal probe of electron density of adsorbed species or single atomoverlayers.
F total = FCTR + F top layer
=A(~Q)
1 − e i2πl
+ A(~Q)e−i2π(1+z0)l
where z0 is the relative displace-ment of the top layer from thebulk lattice spacing a3This effect gets larger for largermomentum transfers
10-1
100
101
102
0 2π 4π
z0=+0.05
z0=+0.10
ICT
R
Qz
C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 570 - Fall 2016 October 19, 2016 16 / 16
top related