transcending the depiction of market and non-market labour practices; implications for degrowth
Post on 18-Dec-2014
919 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
TRANSCENDING THE DEPICTION OF MARKET AND NON-MARKET LABOUR PRACTICES, EXPLORING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR DE-GROWTH
Colin C Williams : Professor of Public Policy, School of Management, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street Sheffield S1 4DT, UK, E-mail: C.C.Williams@sheffield.ac.uk
Presented byDr. Richard J White : Senior Lecturer in Economic Geography, Faculty of Development and Society, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK , Telephone +44(0)114 2252899, E-mail: Richard.White@shu.ac.uk
Second International Conference on Degrowth, Barcelona March 2010
Part I: Moving beyond the economic binary framework
Part II: The geographies of community engagement and their relevance for de-growth.
Part III toward a Total Social
Organization Labour (TSOL) approach to community self-help
"The Economy haunts and constrains us as social beings – we find our life pathways and visions of social possibility hemmed and hampered by its singular capitalist identity"
J.K. Gibson-Graham (2001) An Ethics of the Local
• "Escaping from the economy: the politics of degrowth"
(Fournier, 2008)
• Putting the economy in its place
"The iceberg model places the reputation of economics as a comprehensive and scientific body of knowledge under critical suspicion for its narrow focus and mystifying effects."
Useful but…
Problematising this formal/ informal binary hierarchy
"The informal economy considers those diverse forms of work and activities that exist beyond formal employment""
Conventional Representations
Formal (Superordinate) Informal (Subservient)
Capitalist Pre-Capitalist
Advanced Primitive
Progressive Residual
Mainstream Marginal
Dynamic Stagnant
Strong Weak
Forward Backward
Extensive Limited
Growth De-growth
Community self-help"Not-for-profit motivated help provided for and by friends, neighbours or other members of ones' community either on (1) and individual basis or (ii) through more organised collective groups and associations.
Unpaid domestic work
More formal institutions charged with delivering services on a paid or statutory basis
Community self-help is the basis upon which communities survive, thrive and evolve
The moral foundations of society are built upon reciprocity
The dependency culture is corrosive of society The state as a welfare provider is in crisis
Burns et al (2004: 6)
Community Self-help Focuses on:
The RealThe local
People (and empowered relations with others)
Community engagement is a common coping strategy to achieve material, social and emotional ends
Identities
The 'Natural', 'The Instinctive'
The Known, the Familiar
Negotiated space
Informal community engagement
Formal community engagement
More desired/ mature participatory culture of engagement
One-to-one reciprocity represents inferior/ immature/ undeveloped cultures of engagement
"Few people go straight...(into) active engagement with their neighbourhood... Most are on a ladder of involvement, with simple acts of good neighbourliness at one end and a regular commitment with a formal or voluntary organisation...at the other. (Home Office, 1999: 30)
Recognising the complex multi-layered 'reality' of the types of
community engagement
Acknowledging how participatory cultures vary spatially
Illustrating how "mainstream" and "alternative" forms of engagement do
not occupy discrete realms
1. Formal paid job in public, private or
voluntary sectore.g., formal job in
voluntary organisation
FORMAL
2. Informal employmente.g., wholly
undeclared waged employment; under-
declared formal employment (e.g.,
undeclared overtime); informal self-employment
3. Paid community exchanges
e.g., paid favours for friends, neighbours
& acquaintances
4. Paid household/ family work
e.g., paid exchanges within the family
INFORMAL
5. Formal unpaid work in public,
private & voluntary sector
e.g., unpaid work in formal community-
based group; unpaid internship
6. Informal unpaid work in public,
private & voluntary sector
e.g., unpaid children’s soccer
coach without formal police check
7. One-to-one unpaid community
exchanges
e.g., unpaid kinship exchange,
neighbourly favour
8. Unpaid domestic work
e.g., self-provisioning of care within household
Typology of forms of community engagement in the total social organisation of labour (TSOL) PAID
UNPAID
Complex, multi-layered interpretations begin to emerge Unpaid community engagement higher in affluent areas Informal community engagement more popular in deprived areas Formal groups rarely figure in material coping practices
Deprived localities engage more in: Informal unpaid activity (e.g. caring for groups of children on an unregistered
basis) Paid favours for kin, friends, neighbours and acquaintances "Illegitimate" forms of community engagement
Vast majority of literature on the voluntary and community sectors has concentrated almost exclusively on unpaid and legitimate forms of community
engagement. Obvious policy implications arise from this…
English Localities Survey (861 face-to face interviews, 1988-2001, rural & urban, deprived & affluent, 44 tasks investigated)
Rethinking community engagement as a spectrum of types
In deprived neighbourhoods there is a need to :
Nurture one-to-one aid Legitimise those who are engaged in remunerated forms
of community involvement (i.e. tally system needed when people conduct favours for each other)
Local Exchange and Trading Schemes (LETS)
Time Banks
There is a great need to recognise how popular binary representations & conceptual frameworks are fundamental in: Framing, de-legitimising and limiting debate and discussion
Overlooking the complex realities of our contemporary economic spaces and
Closing-down the possibility of imagining and harnessing other complex economic futures
In two important ways TSOL acts as a welcome and significant:• Movement away from the stable/ bounded binary
hierarchical debates• Theoretical and policy-making framework for re-thinking
the 'spaces' which we can constructively target for de-growth as well as providing welcome signs of a significant convivial economy that many see as desirable, and wish to harness.
Fournier, V., 2008. Escaping form the economy: the politics of degrowth. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28, 11/12, pp 528-545
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006) A diverse economy: rethinking economy and economic representation (available at http://www.communityeconomies.org/papers/rethink/rethink7diverse.pdf last accessed 12.03.10)
Glucksmann, M., 2005. Shifting boundaries and interconnections: extending the "total social organisation of labour", The Sociological Review, 52, 2, pp. 19-36.
White, R.J. 2009. Explaining why the non-commodified sphere of mutual aid is so pervasive in the advanced economies: some case study evidence from an English City.
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 29., Nos. 9/10, pp. 457-472
Williams, C.C., 2009. Unravelling cultures of community engagement: a geographically-nuanced approach, paper presented to the ESRC-funded seminar Re-mixing the economy of welfare: what is emerging beyond the market and state?, Nottingham Trent University, 11th November 2009
Williams, C.C. 2004. A Commodified World? Mapping the limits of capitalism, London: Zed
Williams, C.C. Round, J. and Rogers, P., 2007. Beyond the formal/ informal economy binary hierarchy, The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 402-414
Richard J WhiteSenior Lecturer in Economic GeographySheffield Hallam University
E-mail: Richard.white@shu.ac.uk
Colin C WilliamsProfessor of Public PolicySchool of ManagementUniversity of Sheffield
E-mail: C.C.Williams@sheffield.ac.uk
top related