utilizing patient feedback (and therapist civility) to improve psychotherapy outcome dan buccino...
Post on 28-Dec-2015
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Utilizing Patient Utilizing Patient Feedback Feedback
(and Therapist Civility)(and Therapist Civility)to Improve to Improve
Psychotherapy OutcomePsychotherapy OutcomeDan BuccinoDan Buccino
JHBMCJHBMCJHUSOMJHUSOM
BPIBPIJune 27, 2006June 27, 2006
Civility and Healthcare
Through the 20th Century, science has opened the body.
Into the 21st Century, civility will reopen the person.
To do even better science. Pro-civility practice and policies
Civility and Therapy Good therapists born not made? = Good manners come from a good heart. Good therapists made not born? = Good heart comes from good manners.
Legislating civility and public health? (NYC: quality of life, tobacco, obesity)
Teaching and Practicing “Relational Competence.”
Civility and Risk Good relationship with pt and family best
prevention against malpractice suit, even if adverse event.
Injured patients 50% less likely to sue when an error was disclosed and there was an apology. (Annals Int. Med. 2004)
Move in OR & CO to make it illegal to use doctors’ apologies against them in court.
Acknowledge, apologize for outcome, not necessarily take blame.
Osler’s Golden Rule
• “Alter the Golden Rule: What you do not like when done to yourself, do not do to others.”
- Sir William Osler, JHUSOM
• “Others bruise as easily as we do.”
One Step Beyond the Golden Rule!
• Think first of others’ (comfort and convenience).
• If not OK for others, don’t insist.
• Restrain Yourself!
• “presenteeism”
87%
13%
Updating the Wheel:Updating the Wheel:Recent ResearchRecent Research
TreatmentTreatment::60% due to “Alliance” 60% due to “Alliance” and Relationship and Relationship (“common factors”: (“common factors”: 8% of 13%)8% of 13%)
•30% due to “Allegiance” 30% due to “Allegiance”
FactorsFactors (4/13%) (4/13%)
8% due to model and 8% due to model and technique (1/13%)technique (1/13%)
•Extra-therapeuticExtra-therapeutic
Wampold, B. (2001). Wampold, B. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy DebateThe Great Psychotherapy Debate. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hubble, M., Duncan, B., & Miller, S. (1999). The Heart and Soul of Change. Washington, D.C.: APA Press
Relationship FactorsRelationship Factors
•The Therapeutic The Therapeutic Alliance:Alliance:
•Agreement on Agreement on goals;goals;•Agreement on Agreement on tasks;tasks;•““Rogerian” core Rogerian” core conditions.conditions.
60 %60 %
(R+H+P) Formula for Success(R+H+P) Formula for Success
Practitioners’ Contributions:Practitioners’ Contributions:
RRelationshipelationship
HHope and aope and a
PPlanlan
Super ShrinksSuper Shrinks
Do better than other therapists. Do better than other therapists. Period. Regardless of caseload mix, Period. Regardless of caseload mix, severity, training, experience, severity, training, experience, degree, etc.degree, etc.
Interpersonal facilitative skills Interpersonal facilitative skills
(civility) best.(civility) best.
Most open to feedbackMost open to feedback..
Therapy Effectiveness Super Shrinks effective with 75%. Least effective with 25%. Improve least effective by 65% with active,
formal patient feedback (re customer satisfaction, service, and outcome).
Least effective can then become effective with 41% of cases.
All therapy works sometimes with some patients.
What will work with this patient and this therapist at this time?
•Scored to the Scored to the nearest nearest millimeter.millimeter.
•Add the four Add the four scales together scales together for the total score.for the total score.
•Client places a Client places a hash mark on hash mark on the line.the line.
•Each line 10 cm Each line 10 cm (100 mm) in (100 mm) in length.length.
The Outcome Rating ScaleThe Outcome Rating Scale
•Scored to the Scored to the nearest nearest millimeter.millimeter.
•Add the four Add the four scales together scales together for the total score.for the total score.
•Client places a Client places a hash mark on hash mark on the line.the line.
•Each line 10 cm Each line 10 cm (100 mm) in (100 mm) in length.length.
The Session Rating ScaleThe Session Rating Scale
Patient 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Session
Pati
en
t O
utc
om
e &
Sati
sfa
cti
on
ORS SRS
JHBMC Student Therapist Outcomes 2003-06
9 students; passive collection of data N=89 cases (n=75 ≥2 sessions) Mean # sessions: 6.4 Mean intake ORS: 18.9 Mean D/C ORS: 25.1 (recovered ≥ 25
clinical cutoff) Mean RCI: 6.2 (improved ≥ 5 points)
JHBMC Student Therapist Outcomes 2003-06 (cont’d)
48% improved (RCI ≥5) (36/75) 59% recovered (D/C ORS ≥25) (44/75) 86% of improved also recovered (31/36) Preliminary data 6/26/06 Progress comes quickly. Tx is beginning
of end. Deterioration comes over time.
JHBMC Student Therapist Outcomes 2003-06 (cont’d)
Mean RCI with intake ORS < 25 (clinical cutoff) (72%, 54/75) : 9.7 (cf. 6.2)
More symptomatic populations improve more in tx.
61% (33/54) improve. 50% (27/54) recover. Big improvements even without
complete recovery. Therapy works!
JHBMC Student Therapist Patient Satisfaction 2003-06
9 students; passive collection of data N=89 cases (n=75 ≥ 2 sessions) Mean # sessions: 6.4 Mean intake SRS: 34 Mean D/C SRS: 35.6 Preliminary data 6/26/06
Patient 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Session
Pat
ient
Outc
om
e &
Sat
isfa
ctio
nORS SRS
Thank You!Thank You!
Questions, comments, concerns?Questions, comments, concerns?
Dan BuccinoDan Buccino
410.550.0105410.550.0105
DBuccino@jhmi.eduDBuccino@jhmi.edu
Counterintuitive Civility
It may be simple, but it’s not easy. Common sense isn’t always common
practice. Changing surface changes depth.
Patient 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Session
Pati
en
t O
utc
om
e &
Sati
sfa
cti
on
ORS SRS
Patient 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Session
Pati
en
t O
utc
om
e &
Sati
sfa
cti
on
ORS SRS
Patient 3
0
5
10
1520
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Session
Pati
ent
Outc
om
e &
Sati
sfa
ctio
nORS SRS
Patient 4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Session
Pati
ent
Outc
om
e &
Sati
sfact
ion
ORS SRS
Patient 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Session
Pat
ient
Outc
om
e &
Sat
isfa
ctio
nORS SRS
Patient 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Session
Pati
en
t O
utc
om
e &
Sati
sfa
cti
on
ORS SRS
Patient 4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Session
Pati
ent
Outc
om
e &
Sati
sfact
ion
ORS SRS
Patient 3
0
5
10
1520
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Session
Pati
ent
Outc
om
e &
Sati
sfa
ctio
nORS SRS
top related