via email and u.s. mail - southern california edison. box 800 via email thomas r administra...

P.O. Box 800

Via Email Thomas RAdministraCalifornia 505 Van NSan Franci

Dear ALJ

As (“Joint UtiexemptionThe Joint UDelaware lother memapplicationan order thalternative2012, the A

Wia pending applicationparty, the Dwe have adFebruary 1Given thatrequest and

Purcommunicof the R. 0

1 A c2 The requ3 R. 0

2244 Waln

l and U.S. M

R. Pulsifer ative Law JuPublic Utili

Ness Avenue isco, CA 94

Re:

Pulsifer:

you know, Silities”) are t

ns from the CUtilities submlimited liabi

mber of the Sn before theihat the affiliaely, a waiverACC approv

ith the ACC’application bn, we were hDivision of Rddressed DR17, 2012 amet we are on ad urge the C

rsuant to CPcation on all 05-10-030 se

opy of the ACCe Joint Utilitiesuest hearings. 05-10-030 is th

nut Grove Ave.

Mail

udge ities Commis

4102

A.11-11-01

Southern Cathe joint appCalifornia Pumitted their ility companTARS Alliair regulatoryate transactior of the regulved APS’ app

’s approval obefore their

hopeful to haRatepayer A

RA’s concernendment to ta critical path

Commission t

PUC Rule 8.3parties on th

ervice list.3

C decision is as note that in S

he Commission

Rosemead, C

Apr

ssion

9

alifornia Edislicants to A.

ublic Utilitierequest beca

ny called STAance, Arizony agency, theon rules did lations. Theplication.1

of APS’ appstate regulat

ave had a CoAdvocates (“Dns in our Febthe applicatih to moving to act quickl

3(c)(3), we ahe A. 11-11-

attached for youection IV of D

n’s rulemaking

California 91770

ril 20, 2012

son Compan. 11-11-019,s Commissioause they deARS Allianca Public Ser

e Arizona Conot apply toe Joint Utilit

lication, the tory agency.

ommission dDRA”) filedbruary 3, 20ion which inforward wit

ly on our app

are serving a-019 service

ur review. RA’s January 2

on the affiliate

(626) 302-1999

ny and Pacifi which seekon’s (“CPUC

esire to have ce, LLC. Bervice Compaorporation Co the proposeties wish to l

Joint Utiliti. As indicate

decision by Md a protest to12 response

ncluded a revth the STARplication wit

a copy of thilist, as well

24, 2012 prote

e transaction ru

GSegl

9 Fax (626)

fic Gas and Eks an order grC”) affiliate an equity ow

esides the Joany (“APS”)

Commission (ed transactiolet you know

ies are the laed in our No

March 31, 20o our applica

to the protevised STARSRS formationthout eviden

s written ex as a courtes

st, DRA indica

ules.

Gloria M. Ing enior Attorney loria.ing@sce.co

302-3990

Electric Comranting limittransaction

wnership in int Utilities,, had a pend(“ACC”), se

on, or, w that on Ap

ast utilities toovember 201012. Only onation. We best, as well asS reporting fn, we respectntiary hearing

parte sy copy to pa

ated that it doe

om

mpany ted rules. a one

ding eeking

pril 5,

o have 11 ne elieve s our form. tfully gs.2

arties

s not

Thomas R. Pulsifer Administrative Law Judge California Public Utilities Commission April 20, 2012 Page 2

Very truly yours,

/s/ Gloria M. Ing

Gloria M. Ing Southern California Edison Company /s/ Doreen A. Ludemann Doreen A. Ludemann Pacific Gas and Electric Company

GMI:odf LIMS 310-1350

Enclosure cc: R. Rashid (DRA) S. Logan (DRA) A. 11-11-019 service list R. 05-10-030 service list