vienna 12.07.2006
Post on 04-Jan-2016
23 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
2nd IG-Meeting
Preparation of the Coordinated Physical Transmission Right (PTR)
Allocation Scheme for the CEE – Region
Vienna
12.07.2006
2
Commitment of 8 TSOs from CEE-Region
Common willingness of 8 TSOs to improve allocation system: Bring better in line commercial and physical load flows
(PTR allocation) Coordinated Capacity Forecast Firmness and netting as far as possible from the view of
secure grid operation Foundation of an independent auction office One stop shop, direct bids between all countries involved
-
3
Time schedule5th April – High Level Meeting:
HLM decision of 8 TSOs to establish two Working Group for further development.
2nd May: 1st coordination Meeting of WG chairmen
19th May: 1st WG – Meeting Flow Based Allocation
24th May: 1st WG – Meeting Coordinated Auctioning
14th June: 2nd coordination Meeting of WG chairmen
20nd June: 2nd WG – Meeting Flow Based Allocation
26th June: 2nd WG – Meeting Coordinated Auctioning
7nd June: 3rd coordination Meeting of WG chairmen
11th July – High Level Meeting:
Presentation of common Working Group report to HLG and HLG decision.
4
Current Status
Working Group „Flow Based Allocation“ – chaired by PSE Development of concept of flow based mechanism – PTDF and Border
Capacities Investigate necessary preconditions and environment Common network model and common data
Working Group „Coordinated Auction“ – chaired by APG Prepare new approach of commonly owned, independent and transparent
auction office Auction rules for flow based allocation Principles for distribution of revenues
WGs work together, chairs coordinate frequently their work
Joint presentation
5
Principles of Design of CEE Auction Office
Joint the same amount of shares of the AO for each TSO the same rights of access to and control of the AO for each TSO
Independent AO with full legal rights No subsidiary of a TSO
Transparent Towards national authorities and market participant (clear and
easily accessible market information) auction rules and results Toward the AO shareholders (clear and easily accessible
information for monitoring) business process
6
General procedures for PTR auctions
PTR Auctions
TSOs
PTR Holder
Secondary Market
SchedulingSupport
RiskManagement
“online”
BCsPTDF-coordination
PurchaseData
SaleData
System DataPTDF, ABCs, Base Cases,
Auction Results(historical, actual)
Auction Participants
Auction Entities
AO:AO:
IT-relatedIT-related
AO: AO:
Customer relatedCustomer related
Proposed structure is also open for further developments (e.g. OMC)
7
Concept of Common Grid Model for capacitycalculation by an Auction Office
Capacity Forecast based on Secure grid operation as first priority Flow based method Daily forecast for border capacities provided by common
centralised body Final decision remains with the responsible TSO Not considering preventive measures to increase capacities (in
order to save reserves for necessary re-dispatch during real time trading)
Sensitive data should be updated periodically (e. g. wind and hydro generation)
8
Decisions from HLG
Principle support of the HLG for further investigation on PTR-auctions and on a centralised calculation of a grid model, capacities and PDTF matrix
Principle support to provide data – as far as they are available
General agreement on the content of a common Position Paper
Decision on a preliminary optimistic time table (implementation scenario)
9
PTR Allocation - Challenges on technical parameters calculation
New centralised approach of common calculation activities necessary (while responsibility for SoS remains with the individual TSOs)
Higher complexity of the calculation process (more parties involved – not only regional, huge amount of data,…)
If adopted to the specific region strongly affected by external regions creates „ chicken and egg story”
More complex information of the offered capacities for market participants (ABC plus PTDF)
In contradiction with present UCTE rules on scheduling has to be modified
10
Position Paper: preliminary Time Table (optimistic)
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6
1) Signing Position Paper
1) Continuation of WGs tasks’ (with support from “scientific” consultant)
2) Draft concept of technical parameter calculation
3) Fixing the principles of distributing the auction incomes
4) Finishing of concept of scheduling support (and impose UCTE to modify OH P.2)
5) Finishing of elaboration of legal framework
6) Adaptation and finishing of Business Plan
Identify issues for Regulators for market harmonisation
1) Board approval on concept/methodology of technical parameter calculation
2) Implementation design of technical parameter calculations (contract)
Acceptance of Regulators on principles on revenue distribution
Notification EC Merger regulation
Approval of Regulators on the concept of technical Parameter calculation
1) Acceptance of implementation design
2) Foundation of CEE-AO
3) Finishing of Auction Rules
4) Tender for IT
Approval of Regulator on Auction Rules (and on Multilateral Agreement)
1) IT-installation
2) AO staff recruiting
3) Testing phase (Trial operation)
Operationalisation of CEE-AO – Starting Phase
August 2006
Nov 2006 Dec 2006 Q1/2007Q2&Q3/2007
Q4/2007*
11
Support and decisions from Regulators
Support concerning market harmonisation
Approval of costs for establishing and running a common AO before establishing the entity.
Support according to possible obstacles due to the EC Merger Regulation 139/2004.
Acceptance of principles on revenue distribution
Approval of Regulators on the concept of techn. Parameter calculation
To proceed with the process according to the shown time table support and decisions from Regulators are necessary!
12
Outlook
Serious time constraints Capacity forecast (common grid model, IT etc.) Data to asses external effects from adjacent regions Decisions in Supervisory Boards of TSOs necessary Legal procedure according EC Merger Regulation 139/2004 Future Guidelines not entered into force until now Changes in scheduling nomination procedure necessary (UCTE OH) Approval of regional regulators for financing the CEE-AO
Preparation to prolong current solution (AO: CEPS) with changed auction rules – but to change to new system as soon as possible
13
Challenging exercise, but all participating TSOs are giving their highest commitment to it and are stating their
willingness to make a further step forward to a transparent market integration in the CEE region.
top related