we treasure learning at ruth clark. student demographics data analysis and school improvement
Post on 14-Dec-2015
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
We Treasure Learning at Ruth Clark
Student DemographicsData Analysis and School Improvement
Haysville USD 261 Motto: Caring, effective learning for all.
Mission Statement: The mission of the Haysville Public Schools is to advance learning for all through the relentless pursuit of excellence.
Ruth Clark Elementary School: The mission of Ruth Clark is to prepare students to embrace learning, overcome adversities, and become life-long learners.
Ruth Clark Jaguar PRIDE PledgeAs a Ruth Clark student, I pledge to be respectful, responsible, and real. I will do my best at all times, wherever I go, to show Jaguar PRIDE.
PreparationRespectIntegrityDisciplineExcellence
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011290
300
310
320
330
340
350
360
370
380
329
319
344
367375
370
Ruth Clark September 20th Count 2010N
umbe
r of S
tude
nts
2010-2011 Student Gender
2010-2011 Socio-Economic Status
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
50
42.945.4
48.151 52
Ruth Clark Student Data Percentage of Low SES StudentsPe
rcen
tage
of L
ow S
ES
2010-2011 Building Diversity
• Ruth Clark • Haysville
Ruth Clark ELL Students
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
6.4
9.1
17.816.8
15.213.81
Ruth Clark ELL Students
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
School Goal: Preparing students to embrace learning, overcome adversities, and become life-long learners. Action Plan: Ruth Clark’s plan to reach this goal includes modeling and teaching the expectations and addressing the student needs in the following four areas; academics, communication, wellness and positive behaviors.
Ruth Clark Concept Map
Academics• Standards-driven instruction• High expectations for all• Provide positive support
Communication• PTO parental involvement• Site Council• Focused PLC’s (data driven)• All call
Positive Behaviors• Established consistent routines and
procedures1. HALLS2. GYM3. BREAK4. CAFÉ5. BUS
• Rewards and Recognition for accomplishments• Relationships
Wellness• Organized walking program• Nutrition – Healthy Lifestyle
Kansas Math Assessment% Performing Proficient or Above
Year Ruth Clark State AYP Target
2007 91.0 84.4 67.2 2008 93.8 86.2 71.9 2009 94.2 86.3 76.6 2010 94.3 83.6 82.3 2011 94.2 85.5 86.7
2014 NCLB Target 100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
66.8
73.477.8
82.386.7
84.4 86.2 86.3 88.285.5
91 93.8 94.2 94.3 94.2
Ruth Clark Math State Assessment Scores
AYP TargetState ScoresRuth Clark Scores
School Years
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Third Fourth Fifth80
85
90
95
100
105
89.588.4
87.5
91.590.6
88.1
98.3100
88.5
Ruth Clark Student Data2011 Kansas Math AssessmentStudents Proficient or Above
State District Ruth Clark
% S
tude
nts
Profi
cien
t or A
bove
Summary of Target Area: Math• Scores have consistently improved for all
students • There is no gap between male/female scores• Low SES scores continue to improve and the
gap is closing• Data is continually monitored to address any
discrepancies between gender, socio-economics and student with disabilities subgroups
Kansas Reading Assessment% Performing Proficient or Above
Year Ruth Clark State AYP Target
2007 92.1 81.9 71.7 2008 95.9 83.6 75.8 2009 87.2 84.2 79.8 2010 94.3 86.2 83.7 2011 95.5 85.5 87.8
2014 NCLB Goal 100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
20
40
60
80
100
120
69.5 71.7
79.783.7
87.881.9 83.6 86.2 88.2 87.9
92.1 95.987.2
94.3 95.5
Ruth Clark State Reading Scores
AYP TargetState ScoresRuth Clark Scores
School Years
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Third Fourth Fifth80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
86
89.3
86.8
88.6
91.5 91.6
96.7 97.4
92.7
Ruth Clark 2011 Student Data Kansas Reading Assessment Students Scoring Proficient of Above
StateDistrictRuth Clark
Grade Level
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Summary of Target Area : Reading
• Scores continue to improve for all students
• No discrepancy between gender on the assessment
• Gap between socio-economically disadvantaged is closing
• Continue monitoring for discrepancies between gender, ELL, SES and SpEd subgroups
2009 2010 201182
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
92 92.3
93.3
88
90.3
93
94.2
98.3
89.5
State Science Assessment
State DistrictRuth Clark
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s Pr
ofici
ent
Our scores dipped in science We attribute that quite honestly to our focus on reading and math. We are hoping to gain instructional time this year by addressing some of these standards through our Literacy First centers.
top related