workshop presentation open access non-contrast t and t … · 2017. 4. 6. · workshop presentation...

Post on 16-Oct-2020

4 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

WORKSHOP PRESENTATION Open Access

Non-contrast T1 and T2 relaxometrycharacterizes reperfusion injury of acute MIin swineHaiyan Ding1,2*, Michael Schär3, Karl H Schuleri4,5, Henry R Halperin4, M Muz Zviman4, Roy Beinart4,6,Daniel A Herzka2

From 18th Annual SCMR Scientific SessionsNice, France. 4-7 February 2015

BackgroundReperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction (MI)results in edema, necrosis, microvascular obstruction(MVO), and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH), the lat-ter presents an interesting clinical target. [1] Cardiovas-cular MRI has been shown capable of characterizing allof these tissue components. Other than MVO, which iscurrently detected by flow-deficient regions in contrastenhanced imaging, all other tissue components can beidentified by T1 and T2 (T2*). Theoretically, the bypro-ducts of blood breakdown observed with IMH lead todecreased T1 and T2 (T2*). [2] Conversely, free wateraccumulation (edema) and necrosis lead to increased T1

and T2. [2] Hence, direct and quantitative measurementof relaxation rates is promising in myocardial tissuecharacterization, avoiding ambiguity typical of weightedimages (i.e. T2-weighted spin-echo), undesired signalloss from T2* (weighted) images or the uncertaintyintroduced by contrast agent kinetics. Hypothesis: Com-bined T1 and T2 mapping can characterize reperfusedMI without contrast agents.

MethodsMI was induced in swine by 1 (N=3) or 2 (N=3) hr bal-loon occlusion of the LAD after the first diagonal, withMRI 7-9 days post MI (Achieva TX, Philips). Relaxome-try: 3D respiratory navigator-gated T2-mapping [3]; 2DBreath-hold T1-mapping (MOLLI) [4]. Clinical standard:breath-hold black-blood T2W TSE (BB-T2-STIR) [5];early (3 min post) gadolinium-enhanced images (EGE)using PSIR and 0.2 mmol/kg Magnevist. [6]. IMH was

identified in T2W images/T1/T2 maps as areas ofhypointensity surrounded by hyperintense signal/T1/T2

representing edema. MVO was defined in EGE imagesas hypointense areas surrounded by enhanced MI. Theco-localization of tissue types among techniques wasexamined.

ResultsIMH was detected in all animals with 2 hr occlusions,identified by decreased T1 and T2, and was spatiallyconsistent with the hypoenhanced core in BB-T2-STIRand with MVO in EGE. Edema was observed in all ani-mals (elevated T1and T2). (Fig. 1)Planimetry showed that relative to remote myocar-

dium, T1 and T2 of edema were significantly higher (p <0.001 and p <1e-5, respectively), while within IMH T1

was lower (p = 0.001) and T2 the same (p = 0.28). (Fig. 2)

ConclusionsThough either T1 or T2 can be used to separate tissues,combined T1 and T2 mapping may allow for more accu-rate detection of IMH in reperfusion injury, without varia-bility from contrast kinetics, or BB-T2-STIR artifacts. [7]Based on a small number of animals, T2 was superior inedema detection, while T1 performed better in IMH detec-tion. Combined relaxometry may identify tissues with bet-ter specificity than individual and may help clarify the linkbetween MVO and IMH. High-resolution relaxometrymay be necessary to avoid partial volume.

FundingFunded in part by the American Heart Association -11SDG5280025.

1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of BiomedicalEngineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaFull list of author information is available at the end of the article

Ding et al. Journal of Cardiovascular MagneticResonance 2015, 17(Suppl 1):W14http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/17/S1/W14

© 2015 Ding et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction inany medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ details1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of BiomedicalEngineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 2Department of BiomedicalEngineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3RussellH. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, JohnsHopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4Department of Medicine,Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.5Department of Radiology, Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, Darby, PA, USA. 6HeartInstitute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Published: 3 February 2015

References1. Yellon: NEJM 2007.

2. Salerno: JACC CVI 2013.3. Ding: MRM 2014.4. Messroghli: MRM 2004.5. Simonetti: Radiol 1996.6. Kellman: MRM 2002.7. Kellman: MRM 2007.

doi:10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-W14Cite this article as: Ding et al.: Non-contrast T1 and T2 relaxometrycharacterizes reperfusion injury of acute MI in swine. Journal ofCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2015 17(Suppl 1):W14.

Figure 1 Matched representative SAX images from swine without hemorrhage after 1 hr LAD occlusion (Case #1) (a-d) and with hemorrhageafter a 2 hr occlusion (Case #2) (e-h). In Case #1, significant T1 and T2 elevation are present in both maps (c,d), though no MVO was observedwith EGE (b) nor was a hypointense core present in T2W images (a). In comparison, Case #2 shows clear IMH, demarked by decrease in T1 andT2, surrounded by edema, shown by increased T1 and T2 (g and h), all of which are excellently co-localized with that in T2W (e) and EGE (f).Green arrowhead indicates edema; red arrowhead indicates the core of IMH. Note that T1 mapping is influenced by off-resonance and lowerimage resolution. As the result of competing effects on T1 and T2 from IMH and edema, partial volume averaging makes the T2 in IMH close tothat of normal myocardium.

Figure 2 a. ROI-based T1 & T2 for edema, IMH and remote myocardium from matched T1 and T2 maps. b. Changes in T1 & T2 after subtractionof the reference values of remote myocardium. Edema had higher T2 than both remote myocardium or IMH. T1 can be used to discriminatebetween edema, IMH and normal myocardium, though the distributions may overlap. Edema and IMH can be classified with higher specificityusing both T1 and T2.

Ding et al. Journal of Cardiovascular MagneticResonance 2015, 17(Suppl 1):W14http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/17/S1/W14

Page 2 of 2

top related