extra-territorial application of united states law paul b. klaas partner-in-charge (international)...

Post on 16-Jan-2016

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

www.dorsey.com

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF UNITED STATES LAW

Paul B. KlaasPartner-in-charge (International)

Dorsey & Whitney LLPMinneapolis / London

www.dorsey.com 3

Microsoft v. ATT (U.S. Sup. Ct. 2007)

“There is a presumption that United States law governs domestically but does not rule the world.”

www.dorsey.com 4

www.dorsey.com 5

SOME US LAWS WITHEXTRA-TERRITORIAL APPLICATION

Antitrust Laws

Securities Fraud Laws

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Export Administration Regulations

Cuban Asset Control Regulations

www.dorsey.com

US ANTITRUST LAWS

www.dorsey.com 7

Sherman Act (1890)

www.dorsey.com 8

Sherman Act

Section 1: Restraint of Trade

Section 2: Monopolization

www.dorsey.com 9

Clayton Act (1914)

www.dorsey.com 10

Clayton Act

Price discrimination

Tying

M&A

www.dorsey.com 11

“Effects Test”

US courts have jurisdiction over the conduct of foreign corporations where that conduct was intended to, and actually did, affect US commerce

US v. Alcoa (2d Cir. 1945)

www.dorsey.com

Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act

(“FTAIA”) (1982)

www.dorsey.com 13

FTAIA

US antitrust laws apply if:

1) The conduct has a “direct, substantial, and reasonably forseeable effect” on US domestic commerce, imports into the US, or US exporters, and

2) The conduct “gives rise to a claim under the provisions of the [US antitrust laws]”

www.dorsey.com 14

Statoil v. Heeremac (5th Cir. 2001)

Global conspiracy among barge owners caused American consumers to pay “supracompetitive prices for oil”

But, the global conspiracy did not “give rise to an [antitrust] claim” by Statoil

So, US antitrust laws do not apply

Case dismissed

www.dorsey.com 15

Comity

Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America (9th Cir. 1976)

US federal courts should balance “effects” on the United States of anticompetitive conduct in foreign countries against “the degree of conflict with foreign law or policy” before finding that US antitrust laws apply

www.dorsey.com 16

US SECURITIES LAWS

www.dorsey.com 17

US SECURITIES LAWS

Securities Act of 1933– Section 5: requires that corporations register with

SEC if wish to sell securities in the US

Securities Act of 1934– Section 10(b)(5): forbids “untrue statement of a

material fact”

Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002

– the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”

www.dorsey.com 18

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

www.dorsey.com 19

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Increased disclosure requirements for public companies

Corporate executives personally responsible for financial information reported to SEC

Increased SEC enforcement powers and penalties

www.dorsey.com 20

Effects and/or Conduct

In determining whether US securities laws apply, US courts will apply:

An “effects test” and

A “conduct test”

www.dorsey.com 21

Foreign³ [foreign-cubed cases]

“1) foreign plaintiffs suing,

2) a foreign issuer in an American court for violations of American securities laws based on securities transactions in

3) foreign countries.”

Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.(2d Cir. 2008) (certiorari accepted by US Sup. Ct.)

www.dorsey.com 22

Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. (2d Cir. 2008)

Q. “What conduct comprises the heart of the alleged fraud?”

A. The fraudulent statements made at NAB headquarters in Australia, not the falsified numbers calculated in US

No jurisdiction in US federal court

Case dismissed

www.dorsey.com

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

(“FCPA”)

www.dorsey.com 24

FCPA

A “covered person”

may not make a prohibited payment or offer

to a “foreign official”

with corrupt intent.

www.dorsey.com 25

FCPA

“Covered person” includes, for example:

– US citizens– US corporations– Foreign subsidiaries of US corporations– Foreign corporations who are “issuers”

registered with the SEC– Anyone acting in the US

www.dorsey.com 26

FCPA

“Prohibited payments or offers” include, for example:

– Cash– Paid travel expenses– Free upgrades of airplane seats– Requested donations to charities– “Anything of value”

www.dorsey.com 27

FCPA

“Foreign official” includes, for example:

– Government officials– Employees of state-owned or controlled

entities

www.dorsey.com 28

FCPA

“Corrupt intent” includes, for example:

– Influencing any act or decision, or– Securing any improper advantage, or– Inducing the foreign official to use his

influence– To obtain or retain business

www.dorsey.com 29

Lanny Breuer Assistant Attorney General of the United States

(Criminal Division) November 12, 2009

“Our focus and resolve in the FCPA area will not decrease, and we will be intensely focused on rooting out foreign bribery in your industry. That will mean investigation and, if warranted, prosecution of corporations to be sure, but also investigation and prosecution of senior executives. Effective deterrence requires no less. Indeed, we firmly believe that for our enforcement efforts to have real deterrent effect, culpable individuals must be prosecuted and go to jail…”

www.dorsey.com 31

EXPORT ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS

(“EAR”)

www.dorsey.com 32

Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”)

Targets “dual use” items -- items that can have commercial or military uses

Items can be commodities, technology, software…

www.dorsey.com 33

EAR

US Department of Commerce license is required, if: 1) the item is “in the United States” or is

“U.S. origin,” 2) the item is on the Commerce Control List

(15 C.F.R. pt 774), and 3) the item is being exported or re-exported to a

country on the Country Chart (15 C.F.R. 738)

www.dorsey.com 34

EAR

“Re-export” includes:

– Transfer of U.S. origin items from one foreign country to another

– Transfer of technology or software to a foreign national outside of the US (e.g., delivery, oral briefing, visual inspection)

www.dorsey.com 35

CUBAN ASSETCONTROL REGULATION

(“CACR”)

www.dorsey.com 36

Cuban Asset Control Regulation (“CACR”)

CACR bars US citizens or entities

from transacting business with Cuba

www.dorsey.com 37

CACR applies to:

All US citizens

All US permanent residents

All individuals and organizations physically in the US

All branches and subsidiaries of US organizations throughout the world

– US Office of Foreign Assets Control

www.dorsey.com 38

Nyheter

Cuba fordømmer norsk hotellnekt

Scandic Edderkoppens amerikanske eiere vil ikke ha kubanske gjester.Foto: Espen Braata /ScanpixKubanske myndigheter beskylder Norge for å bøye seg for amerikansk press etter at en kubansk delegasjon ble nektet å ta inn på et amerikanskeid hotell i Oslo.

www.dorsey.com 39

Helms-Burton Act (the “Libertad” Act) (1996)

www.dorsey.com 40

Helms-Burton Act

Title III: “Protection of Property Rights of US Nationals”

– US nationals who had property expropriated by the Cuban government can sue anyone who “traffics” in such property, including non-US individuals and entities (suspended)

Title IV: “Exclusion of Certain Aliens”

– “Traffickers” (including corporate executives) can be denied entrance to the US

www.dorsey.com 41

Canadian Response to theUS Helms-Burton Act

The Godfrey-Milliken Bill (Canada, 1996)

www.dorsey.com 42

Godfrey-Milliken Bill

Persons loyal to England who fled the US in 1776 and became Canadians may reclaim land confiscated by American revolutionary courts

Americans who “traffic” in property confiscated from loyalists shall be barred from Canada

(The bill was not passed by the Canadian Parliament)

top related