zl b croydon zr b kingston zl b merton z south london waste plan · south london capacity (2017...

South London Waste Plan

L B CroydonR B Kingston

L B MertonL B Sutton

PAGE 3 Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan

SEQUENTIAL TEST (FLOOD RISK)

ON PROPOSED WASTE MANAGEMENT SITES

Draft South London Waste Plan (SLWP)

Submission Version

September 2020

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 4

Contents Page

ONE Introduction 7 Background to the new South London Waste Plan 7 Purpose of the Sequential Test 8 Environment Agency Flood Zones 9 Purpose of the Exceptions Test 9 Flood Risk Vulnerability Classifications 9 Flood risk compatability of different development types 11 TWO Flood rrisk across the plan area 155 LB Croydon 13 RB Kingston 15 LB Merton 17 LB Sutton 19 THREE Identification of potential waste sites for the purpose of the Sequential Test 211 Identifying sites and broad locations 21 Initial site profiling 21 Broad areeas considered unsuitable for waste uses 22 Assessing current and future waste management capacity 23 Site appraisal 26 FOUR Sequential Testing of Potential Waste Sites 29 TABLE 4.1: LOW RISK: POTENTIAL SITES AND BBROAD LOCATIONS AAT LOW RISK

OF FLOODING (LOCATED WHOLLY IN FLOOD ZONE 1) 311

TABLE 4.22: MMEDIUM RRISK: POTENTIAL SITES AND BROAD LOCATIONS AT MEDIUM RISK OF FLOODING (LOCATED WHOLLY OR PARTLY IN FLOOD ZONE 2)

55

TABLE 4.33: HHIGH RRISK: POTENTIAL SITES AND BROAD LOCATIONS AT HHIGH RRISK OF FLOODING (LOCATED WHOLLY OOR PARTLY IN FLOOD ZONE 33)

65

FIVE Conclusions 77 Sequential test summary 77 Sequential test conclusions 79 Next steps 80

1. Introduction

Background to the new South London Waste Plan 1.1 The London boroughs of Croydon, Kingston, Merton and Sutton are preparing a new South London Waste Plan (SLWP) covering the time period 2021-36. When it is adopted in 2021-22, the new plan will replace the current SLWP 2011-211 introduced in 2012.

1.2 The purpose of the new SLWP is to plan for the essential waste management infrastructure to support future population and household growth in South London by: safeguarding existing waste management sites; identifying sites and broad locations suitable for new waste facilities if needed; providing sufficient sites across the four partner borough to deliver the combined

apportionment targets set out in the draft London Plan up to 2036, including the aim of achieving net self-sufficiency by 2026; and

setting out planning policies to ensure that new or redeveloped waste facilities within South London drive waste management further up the Government’s waste management hierarchy, promote the circular economy and minimise any adverse impacts upon on nearby land uses and the local environment.

1.3 Following public consultation on an Issues and Preferred Options document and accompanying sustainability appraisal (SA) between 31 October and 22 December 2019 (Regulation 18 consultation2), a draft version of the SLWP 2021-36 (the draft plan) has now been prepared for submission to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (DHCLG) prior to Examination-in-Public.

1.4 The draft plan, which incorporates a number of changes made in the light of representations received and changing circumstances, safeguards 46 existing sites for waste treatment and identifies ten development management policies to guide waste treatment within the four boroughs over the next 15 years. An updated sustainability appraisal (SA) report, incorporating strategic environmental assessment (SEA), Equalities Impact Assessment (EqIA) and Habitats Regulations Screening, has been prepared alongside the draft plan in order to meet the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Regulations 2004 and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 as amended.

1.5 In line with the government’s national planning practice guidance (NPPG), a ‘sequential test’ has also been carried out on all potential waste sites within the plan area in order to identify the level of flood risk for each site, determine if the proposed uses are compatible with that level of risk and, where possible, to steer future waste related developments to areas (or to specific parts of individual sites) at the lowest probability of flooding. This document presents the findings of the sequential test in relation to the draft SLWP and should be read in conjunction with the site assessment included as Section 9 of the SA Report on ‘Identifying and Assessing Waste Sites’.

1.6 The draft plan, together with the SA Report and the Sequential Test (this document) has now been published for further consultation in accordance with Regulation 19 of The Town & Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.

1 the current South London Waste Plan 2012 is available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bww0pBhg-RKJc3ExSE9vQ1czbU0/view 2 under Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012

The purpose of the sequential test 1.7 The updated National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (DHCLG, June 2019)3 requires that inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding should be avoided by directing development away from areas at highest risk, but where development is necessary, making it safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere. Development plan documents, such as the joint South London Waste Plan, should therefore apply a sequential, risk-based approach to the identification of development sites in order to avoid flood risk to people and property and manage any residual risk, taking account of climate change. This should be done by applying the ‘sequential test’ and if necessary, applying the ‘exception test’ to all potential development sites in line with technical guidelines4 set out in the government’s NPPG.

1.8 The purpose of the sequential test is to ensure that sites at little or no risk of flooding are developed in preference to sites at higher risk, taking the vulnerability of the proposed use into account. This will help avoid the development of sites that are inappropriate on flood risk grounds. The sequential approach should be applied at all levels and scales of the planning process, both for sites between flood zones and where a site has to be located in a higher risk zone, within the extent of that flood zone by locating the more vulnerable elements of the development in the areas of lowest risk. All opportunities to locate new developments in reasonably available areas of little or no flood risk should be explored, prior to any decision to locate them in areas of higher risk.

1.9 The NPPG confirms that the Sequential Test can either be demonstrated in a free-standing document or included as part of the SA Report. The four boroughs have opted to produce a free-standing document for ease of reference and in order to avoid an excessively lengthy SA Report.

Environment Agency Flood Zones 1.10 The basis for undertaking the Sequential Test lies primarily in assessing the probability of fluvial (river) flooding to each potential site in line with the following EA flood zone definitions in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1. Environment Agency Flood Zone definitions

Flood Zone Definition

Zone 1:: Low Probability

Land having a less than 1 in 1,000 annual probability of river or sea flooding. (Shown as ‘clear’ on the Flood Map – all land outside Zones 2 and 3)

Zone 2:: Medium Probability

Land having between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of river flooding; or land having between a 1 in 200 and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of sea flooding. (Land shown in light blue on the Flood Map)

Zone 3a:: High Probability

Land having a 1 in 100 or greater annual probability of river flooding; or Land having a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of sea flooding.(Land shown in dark blue on the Flood Map)

Zone 3b:: Functional Floodplain

This zone comprises land where water has to flow or be stored in times of flood. Local planning authorities should identify in their Strategic Flood Risk Assessments areas of functional floodplain and its boundaries accordingly, in agreement with the Environment Agency. (Not separately distinguished from Zone 3a on the Flood Map).

3 the updated NPPF is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 4 formerly set out in the Government’s Planning Policy Statement on Development and Flood Risk (PPS25) (now cancelled)

1.11 The EA’s Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea)5 shows the extent of the above flood zones and provides information on the areas that provides information on the areas that would flood if there were no flood defences or buildings within the ‘natural” floodplain’. It also identifies areas which, in the event of a river flood with a 1% AEP, or a idal flood with a 0.5% AEP, would be protected from flooding by the presence of flood defences6. However it should be noted that the above Flood Zones do not take account of the possible impacts of climate change on the future probability of flooding.

1.12 This mapping was first developed in 2004 using national generalised modelling (JFLOW) and is now routinely updated using the results from the EA’s programme of catchment studies, entailing topographic surveys and hydrological and/or hydraulic modelling as well as previous flood events.

1.13 An overview of flood risk across each of the four boroughs making up the plan area is provided in Section 2 of this document.

The purpose of the Exceptions Test 1.14 If, following application of the sequential test, it is not possible, consistent with wider sustainability objectives, for the development to be located in zones with a lower probability of flooding, the exception test can be applied if appropriate. For the Exception Test to be passed: it must be demonstrated that the development provides wider sustainability benefits to the

community that outweigh flood risk; and a site-specific flood risk assessment (FRA) prepared in support of any planning applicationmust

demonstrate that the development will be “safe for its lifetime taking account of the vulnerability of its users, without increasing flood risk elsewhere, and, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall”. Both elements of the test will have to be passed for development to be allocated or permitted7.

1.15 The NPPG is clear that where other sustainability criteria outweigh flood risk issues, the decision making process should be transparent with reasoned justifications provided (in either the Sequential Test document or in the SA Report) for any decision to allocate land in areas at high flood risk. in the sustainability appraisal report.

Flood risk vulnerability classifications 1.16 The sequential test must take account of the vulnerability of different types of development as set out in the government’s flood risk vulnerability classifications in Table 2 of the NPPG and as set out below in Table 1.2.

Table 1.2. Government Flood Risk Vulnerability Classifications

Essential infrastructure Essential transport infrastructure (including mass evacuation routes) which has to cross the area

at risk. Essential utility infrastructure which has to be located in a flood risk area for operational

reasons, including electricity generating power stations and grid and primary substations; and water treatment works that need to remain operational in times of flood.

Wind turbines.

5 the EA’s Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea) is available at https://flood-map-for-planning.service.gov.uk/ 6 these areas are described as ‘Areas Benefitting from Defences’ (ABD). 7 within the context of the South London Waste Plan, many of the proposed sites are already in operation and therefore have planning permission. In such cases, a site specific FRA will already have been prepared in support of the planning application to demonstrate that the development will be safe for its lifetime taking account of the vulnerability of its users, without increasing flood risk elsewhere, and, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 10 Highly vulnerable Police stations, ambulance stations and fire stations and command centres and

telecommunications installations required to be operational during flooding. Emergency dispersal points. Basement dwellings. Caravans, mobile homes and park homes intended for permanent residential use. Installations requiring hazardous substances consent4. (Where there is a demonstrable need to

locate such installations for bulk storage of materials with port or other similar facilities, or such installations with energy infrastructure or carbon capture and storage installations, that require coastal or water-side locations, or need to be located in other high flood risk areas, in these instances the facilities should be classified as ‘essential infrastructure’)

More vulnerable Hospitals. Residential institutions such as residential care homes, children’s homes, social services homes,

prisons and hostels. Buildings used for dwelling houses, student halls of residence, drinking establishments,

nightclubs and hotels. Non–residential uses for health services, nurseries and educational establishments. Landfill and sites used for waste management facilities for hazardous waste. Sites used for holiday or short-let caravans and camping etc

Less vulnerable Police, ambulance and fire stations which are not required to be operational during flooding. Buildings used for shops, financial, professional and other services, restaurants and cafes, hot food takeaways, offices, general industry, storage and distribution,

non–residential institutions not included in “more vulnerable”, and assembly and leisure; Land and buildings used for agriculture and forestry. Waste treatment (except landfill and hazardous waste facilities). Minerals working and processing (except for sand and gravel working). Water treatment works which do not need to remain operational during times of flood. Sewage treatment works (if adequate measures to control pollution and manage sewage during

flooding events are in place). Water--compatible development Flood control infrastructure. Water transmission infrastructure and pumping stations. Sewage transmission infrastructure and pumping stations. Sand and gravel working. Docks, marinas and wharves. Navigation facilities. Ministry of Defence defence installations. Ship building, repairing and dismantling, fish processing and refrigeration and compatible

activities requiring a waterside location. Amenity open space, nature conservation and biodiversity, outdoor sports and recreation and

essential facilities (changing rooms) Essential ancillary sleeping or residential accommodation for staff required by uses in this

category, subject to a specific warning and evacuation plan.

1.17 It can be seen from the above table that most sites used for waste treatment purposes (except for landfill and hazardous waste facilities) fall within the ‘less vulnerable’ category with regard to flood risk. Both landfill sites and hazardous waste facilities are classed as ‘more vulnerable’ since such sites pose much greater potential risks to human health, ecosystems and neighbouring land uses in the event of a flood. However no new landfill sites are being put forward as part of the new SLWP.

Flood risk compatability of different development types 1.18 Table 1.3, which is based on Table 3 of the NPPG, indicates the compatibility of the above development types with each of the Environment Agency’s (EA) flood zones.

Table 1.3: Flood Risk Vulnerability and Flood Zone ‘Compatibility’ (NPPG, 2014)

Flood Zone Essential

infrastructureWater

compatible Highly

vulnerable More

vulnerable Less

vulnerable

Zone 1:: Low Probability

Zone 2:: Medium Probability

Exception

Test required

Zone 3a:: High Probability

Exception Test required

x Exception

Test required

Zone 3b:: Functional Floodplain

Exception Test required

x x x

1.19 The above vulnerability and flood zone compatability tables show that most sites likely to be retained or designated within the plan area for waste treatment purposes, apart from hazardous waste facilities, are likely to be deemed ‘compatible’ with all levels of fluvial flood risk up to and including EA Flood Zone 3a (high risk) without a formal requirement for the Exception test to be carried out. However, any proposed waste facilities in EA Flood Zone 3b (functional floodplain) should not be permitted. A greater degree of caution is required for hazardous waste facilities, which require an Exception test for sites located within EA Flood Zone 3a (high risk).

1.20 Figure 1.1 below sets out the government’s recommended process for undertaking the sequential and exceptions test as part of the plan preparation process as set out in the NPPG

Figure 1.1: Application of Sequential Test for Local Plan Preparation

2. Flood risk across the plan area 2.1 The extent of flood risk from both fluvial and surface water flooding across the plan area is shown below in Figures 2.1-2.8. The mapping for the London Boroughs of Croydon, Merton and Sutton is based upon the joint Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1 Report prepared on behalf of the four Wandle catchment boroughs8 by AECOM consultants in December 2015. The mapping for the Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames is based on work carried out by Capita consultants in 2014 for the purpoise of kingston’s Local Flood Risk management Strategy.

London Borough of Croydon Figure 2.1: Fluvial flood risk in LB Croydon (EA Flood Zones)

Table 2.1: Fluvial flood risk in LB Croydon – Properties located within EA Flood Zones EA Flood Zone Flood Risk % of Borough Dwellings Non-Residential Unclassified

Flood Zone 1 Low Risk

Less than 1 in a 1000 annual probability (<0.1%)

97.8% 144,140 6,149 8,649

Flood Zone 2 Medium Risk

Between 1 in a 100 and 1 in a 1000 annual prob (1% - 0.1%)

1.7% 1,030 113 107

Flood Zone 3a High Risk

More than 1 in a 100 annual probability (>1%)

<0.5% 3,913 380 326

Flood Zone 3b Functional Floodplain

More than 1 in 20 annual probability (>5% ‘defended’).

<0.5% 235 48 15

8 including the London Borough of Wandsworth

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 14 Figure 2.2: Surface water flood risk in LB Croydon

Source: SFRA Level 1 Report (AECOM, December 2015)

Table 2.2: Surface Water Flooding in LB Croydon: Proprties at Risk in the 1 in 100 year event

RoFSW 9Category

Surface Water Flood Risk Dwellings Non-Residential Unclassified

Low Less than 1 in 100 annual probability (<1%)

32,090 1,434 1,722

Medium Between 1 in 30 and 1 in a 100 annual probability (3.3% - 1%)

10,094 871 638

High More than 1 in a 30 annual probability (>3.3%)

5,856 737 513

Source: Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1 Report (AECOM, December 2015)

9 based on the Government’s Risk of Flooding from Surface Water (RoFSW) map (formerly referred to as the updated Flood Map for Surface water (uFMfSW)

RB Kingston-upon-Thames Figure 2.3: Fluvial flood risk in RB Kingston (EA Flood Zones)

)

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 16 Figure 2.4: Surface water flood risk in RB Kingston

Table 2.4: Surface Water Flooding in RB Kingston: Properties at Risk in the 1 in 100 year event

RoFSW 10Category

Surface Water Flood Risk Dwellings Non-Residential Unclassified

Low Less than 1 in 100 annual probability (<1%)

data not available data not available data not available

Medium Between 1 in 30 and 1 in a 100 annual probability (3.3% - 1%)

High More than 1 in a 30 annual probability (>3.3%)

10 based on the Government’s Risk of Flooding from Surface Water (RoFSW) map (formerly referred to as the updated Flood Map for Surface water (uFMfSW)

LB Merton Figure 2.5: Fluvial flood risk in LB Merton- EA Flood Zones

Source: SFRA Level 1 Report (AECOM, December 2015)

Table 2.5: Fluvial flood risk in LB Merton – Properties located within EA Flood Zones

EA Flood Zone Flood Risk Land Area of the

Borough Dwellings Non-Residential Unclassified

Less than 1 in a 1000 annual probability of flooding (<0.1%)

91.0% 78,864 3,698 6,496

Between 1 in a 100 and 1 in a 1000 annual prob of flooding (1% - 0.1%)

5.2% 5,106 316 489

Flood Zone 3a Highh Risk

More than 1 in a 100 annual probability of flooding (>1%)

1.9% 1,272 101 136

More than 1 in 20 annualprobability of flooding (>5% ‘defended’).

1.7% 254 20 61

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 18 Figure 2.6: Surface water flood risk in LB Merton

Table 2.6: Surface Water Flooding: Properties at Risk in LB Merton

RoFSW Category Surface Water

Flood Risk Dwellings Non-Residential Unclassified

Low Less than 1 in 100 annual probability of flooding (<1%)

19,730 1,147 1,936

Medium Between 1 in 30 and 1 in a 100 annual probability of flooding (3.3% - 1%)

4,361 439 190

High More than 1 in a 30 annual probability of flooding (>3.3%)

1,668 176 247

LB Sutton Figure 2.7: Fluvial flood risk in LB Sutton - EA Flood Zones

Table 2.7: Fluvial flood risk in Sutton – Properties located within EA Flood Zones

EA Flood Zone Flood Risk Land Area of the

Borough Dwellings Non-Residentia Unclassified

Less than 1 in a 1000 annual probability of flooding (<0.1%)

96.3% 76,352 3,236 5,699

Between 1 in a 100 and 1 in a 1000 annual prob of flooding (1% - 0.1%)

2.4% 1,889 167 181

Flood Zone 3a Highh Risk

More than 1 in a 100 annual probability of flooding (>1%)

1.0% 822 20 43

More than 1 in 20 annualprobability of flooding (>5% ‘defended’).

0.2% 198 11 20

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 20 Figure 2.8: Surface water flood risk in LB Sutton

Table 2.8: Surface Water Flooding in LB Sutton: Properties at Risk in the 1 in 100 year event

RoFSW Category Surface Water Flood

Risk Dwellings Non-Residential Unclassified

Low Less than 1 in 100 annual probability of flooding (<1%)

15,429 870 1,078

Medium Between 1 in 30 and 1 in a 100 annual probability of flooding (3.3% - 1%)

4,287 325 303

High More than 1 in a 30 annual probability of flooding (>3.3%)

2,860 267 219

3. Identification of potential waste sites for the purpose of the Sequential Test

Identifying sites and broad locations 3.1 Paragraph 4 of the NPPW states that:

“Waste planning authorities should identify, in their Local Plans, sites and/or areas for new or enhanced waste management facilities in appropriate locations. In preparing their plans, waste planning authorities should give priority to the re-use of previously-developed land, sites identified for employment uses, and redundant agricultural and forestry buildings and their curtilages.”

3.2 In addition, 2020 London Plan Policy SI 8 states that:

“Development Plan should identify the following as suitable locations to manage borough waste apportionments: (a) existing waste and secondary material sites/land, particularly waste transfer facilities, with a view to maximising their capacity; (b) Strategic Industrial Locations and Locally Significant Industrial Sites; (c) safeguarded wharves with an existing or future potential for waste and secondary material management.”

3.3 At the outset of the preparation of the new South London Waste Plan (SLWP), an initial ‘longlist’ of potential sites and ‘broad areas’ was identified for the purposes of both the sequential test and for the wider assessment of site suitability, availability and viability. This incorporated all of the existing or permitted waste treatment sites within the four Boroughs together with all of the Strategic Industrial Locations (SILs) and locally significant industrial locations (LSILs) across the plan area which were previously identified as ‘broad areas suitable for waste management uses’ in Schedule 2 of the existing SLWP 2012.

3.4 The initial ‘longlist’ therefore brought forward all of the currently designated waste sites and broad locations for further consideration as part of the preparation of the SLWP Isues and Preferred Options document for public consultation between 31 October and 2 December 2019.

Initial site profiling 3.5 The period leading up to consultation on SLWP ‘Issues and Preferred Options’, Anthesis consultants prepared initial site profiles for all existing waste management sites including address details, location maps, operator, type of facility, maximum throughput, licensed capacity, type of waste accepted, management type (by reference to the waste hierarchy), nature and scale of the facility, planning constraints and opportunities for intensification or upgrading existing operations.

3.6 The results of the initial site profiling work, incuding a broad assessment of flood risk affecting each potential site, are set out Appendix 4 of the Technical Paper (Anthesis, July 2019).

Broad areas considered unsuitable for waste uses 3.7 Since the adoption of the current SLWP 2012, a number of industrial areas listed in Schedule 2 or smaller parcels of land forming part of a currently designated SILs or LSILs have since been redeveloped or allocated for other uses as set out in Table 3.2 below. These broads areas are therefore considered unsuitable (or unavailable) for the development of future waste facilities and this is reflected in the outcome of the detailed site assessment and the sequential test.

Table 3.2: Broad areas areas previously identified as suitable but not carried forward

SLWP 2012 Ref. Industrial Area Significant changes since 2012

CROYDON/ SUTTON

102 Purley Way, Lysander Road and Imperial WayInd. Area

n/a

CROYDON

99 Purley Oaks Highways Depot

This area has been allocated as a Gypsy and Traveller site. Therefore, it is no longer suitable for new waste facilities

105 Factory Lane Industrial Estate

3.33ha of land within this area has been designated for redevelopment (Proposal Sites 430 and 946). Therefore the area suitable for waste uses will reduce in size

125 Factory Lane (Sth Side)

n/a

KINGSTON

351,352,353

Chessington Industrial Area

n/a

MERTON

641, 642 Durnsford Road Industrial Area

This area has had office buildings converted to residential accommodation under Prior Approval (Vantage House, Weir Road). The Area is now subject to an Article 4 direction which has removed the permitted development rights., however the residential accommodation already within the Area will affect the suitability of the south of the area for new waste uses. Durnsford Road was identified in the Crossrail 2 consultation in 2015 as the ‘proposed site for stabling, depot, shaft and tunnelling works’, however Crossrail 2 works are likely to begin beyond the plan period

702 Garth Road Industrial Area

This area has had office buildings converted to residential uses under Prior Approval (Enterprise House). The Area is now subject to an Article 4 direction which has removed the permitted development rights., however the residential accommodation already within the Area will affect the suitability of parts of the Area for waste uses

69 Willow Lane Industrial Area

This area has had office buildings converted to residential accommodation under Prior Approval (Connect House). The Area is now subject to an Article 4 direction which has removed the permitted development rights, however the residential accommodation already in the middle of the Area will affect the suitability of parts of the Area for waste uses. Willow Lane is a Business Improvement District and is currently subject to a BID vote

SUTTON

5312,532, 533, 534, 535 &539

Beddington Ind Area (part)

n/a

491 Kimpton Industrial Estate (part)

Land north of Minden Road has been redeveloped for other uses. Therefore, it is no longer suitable for new waste facilities

1006 Wandle Valley Trading Estate (part)

This area has been redeveloped for other uses and it is an is an integral part of the Wandle Valley Trail. Therefore, it is no longer suitable for new waste facilities

Assessing current and future waste management capacity 3.8 In order to assess the need for additional waste sites for inclusion in the new SLWP, a comprehensive analysis was undertaken for all operational waste management sites in South London in order to establish current and future waste management capacity within the plan area. A number of data sources were used, including discussions with site owners and EA ‘active sites’, Waste Data Interrogator (WDI) and environmental permitting data (using 2017 as the baseline year).

3.9 The sites included in the appraisal therefore consisted of all of the existing waste treatment sites within the four Boroughs together with all of the Strategic Industrial Locations (SILs) and locally significant industrial locations (LSILs) across the plan area. It also includes Site C4: Days Aggregates site, which utilises the Purley railhead. The Chessington railhead was not included as the operators have informed officers that the site will not be used for waste management purposes and so would fail the availability strand of the developability test (see below).

3.10 In line with the Intend to Publish London Plan 2019, waste is deemed to be ‘managed’ where: it is used in London for energy recovery; it relates to materials sorted or bulked in London facilities for reuse, reprocessing or recycling; it is reused, recycled or reprocessed in London; and it is produced as a solid recovered fuel (SRF) or a high-quality refuse-derived fuel (RDF)

meeting the Defra definition as a minimum11.

3.11 Where material is bulked at transfer stations for transportation to other waste management facilities, this capacity is not included as a contribution towards the apportionment targets. However, where a proportion of the incoming waste is recycled, this recycling capacity has been included.

3.12 Waste facilities in the planning pipeline were identified which, if given permission, would also contribute towards meeting any shortfall in waste management capacity. Exempt sites, which do not require an environmental permit, have also been included where capacity meets the requirements of the London Plan (see Section 5.2.3 of the Anthesis consultants’ Technical Paper).

3.13 Table 3.2 below provides a breakdown of existing waste management capacity for all sites which are currently contributing towards the London Plan 2016 apportionment for household and C&I waste. Where relevant, opportunities to increase capacity are identified, such as intensifying the throughput of existing operations and identifying vacant sites which could be redeveloped for waste uses’.

Table 3.2 Sites Counting Towards the Apportionment and C&D Targets (updated)

Ref Name Household/C&I

(tpa) C&D (tpa)

Potential for Intensification

Croydon

C1 Able Waste Services 0 43,268

C4 Days Aggregates Purley Depot 0 178,593

C5A Factory Lane Waste Transfer Station 0 0 Yes

C5B Factory Lane Reuse and Recycling Centre site 9,623 5,206

C6 Fishers Farm Reuse & Recycling Centre 4,542 0

C7 Henry Woods Waste Management 0 0

11 refuse derived fuel (RDF) consists of residual waste that complies with the specifications in a written contract between the producer of the RDF and a permitted end-user for the thermal treatment of the waste in an energy from waste facility or a facility undertaking co-incineration such as cement and lime kilns

Ref Name Household/C&I (tpa)

C&D (tpa)

C8 New Era Materials 4,213 0

C9 Peartree Farm 0 0

C10 Purley Oaks Civic Amenity Site 6,684 0

C11 Safety Kleen 0 0

C12 Stubbs Mead Depot 0 0

C13 Solo Wood Recycling 5,000 0 Yes

CEX Exempt Sites 2,580 0

Croydon Total 32,883 227,067

Kingston

K2 Genuine Solutions Group 1,630 0

K3 Kingston Civic Amenity Centre 9,392 0

K4 Kingston Waste Transfer Station 19,620 0

KEX Exempt Sites 5,000 0

Kingston Total 35,642 0

Merton Capacity

M1 B&T@Work 0 0

M2 European Metal Recycling 70,100 0

M3 Deadman Confidential 9,866 0

M4 Garth Road Re-use and Recycling Centre 15,704 0

M5 Garth Road Transfer Station 0 0

M6 George Killoughery 0 0

M7 LMD Waste Management (Abbey Industrial Estate) 0 20,774

M8 LMD Waste Management Wandle Way 0 33,845

M9 Maguire Skips (Wandle Way) 0 0

M10 Powerday (Weir Court) 0 42,856

M11 Morden Transfer Station 0 0

M12 NJB Recycling 0 18,030

M13 One Waste Clearance 13,453 4,547

M14 Reston Waste Transfer and Recovery 0 30,131

M15 Riverside AD Facility 46,341 0

M16 Riverside Bio Waste Treatment Centre 51,715 0

M17 UK and European (Ranns) Construction 0 0

M18 Wandle Waste Management 0 0

MEX Exempt Sites 1,000 0

Merton Total 213,179 150,183

Sutton Capacity

S1 777 Recycling Centre 20,625 32,972

S2 Beddington Farmlands ERF 275,000 0

S3 Cannon Hygiene 0 0

S4 Croydon Transfer Station 21,113 0 Yes

S5 Hinton Skips 5,381 1,819 Yes

S6 Hydro Cleansing 0 0

S7 Kimpton Civic Amenity Site 8,640 0

Ref Name Household/C&I (tpa)

C&D (tpa)

S8 King Concrete 0 0 Yes

S9 Premier Skip Hire 8,072 2,728

S10 Raven Recycling 5,310 5,506

S11 TGM Environmental 15,000 0

S12 Country Waste Skip Hire 305,000 0

SEX Exempt Sites 500 0

Sutton Total 664,641 43,025

South London Capacity

Croydon 32,883 227,067

Kingston 35,642 0

Merton 213,179 150,183

Sutton 664,641 43,025

South London Total 946,345 420,275

South London Capacity Gap

South London Capacity (2017 baseline year) 946,345 420,275

South London Apportionment/Forecast for 2036 929,750 414,380

Capacity Gap/ Surplus +16,595 +5,895 Source: Anthesis Consultants 2019 (incorporating subsequent amendments 2020)

3.14 The waste capacity information in Table 3.4 has been revised following consultation on the SLWP Issues and Preferred Options document in order to accommodate new waste throughput figures and to reflect the latest information from site owners as to which sites have potential for intensification. In addition, a number of sites have been amended or deleted as follows: Site C2 (Croydon Car Spares, Croydon) was deleted because it is closed, it only contributed a

minute amount to meeting the targets and was located adjacent to two residential properties;

Site C3 (Curley Skip Hire, Croydon) was deleted because it contributed nothing to the targets and is adjacent to existing and proposed residential uses;

Site C4 (Days Aggregates): The estimated throughput of C&D waste at this site was increased from 0 to 178,593 tonnes per annum following consultation with the site owner;

Site C5 (Factory Lane Waste Transfer Station) was divided into three: C5A (Factory Lane Waste Transfer Station), C5B (Factory Lane Reuse and Recycling Centre) and C13 (Solo Wood Recycling) at the request of the site operators/owners; and

Site K1 (Chessington Equestrian Centre) was deleted because it is a temporary site which is closing soon.

3.15 The most significant outcome of the above changes (arising from the increased throughput figures for the Days Aggregates site C4) is that the overall current throughput of C&D waste across the four boroughs has increased from 241,682 to 420,275 tonnes per year.

3.16 Table 3.1 shows that the current capacity for the management of household and C&I waste in South London is 946,345 tonnes per annum. This represents a capacity surplus of 16,595 tonnes per annum compared to the combined apportionment of 929,750 tonnes per annum for 2036.

Sequential Test (Flood Risk) of Draft South London Waste Plan PAGE 26 3.17 The overall current throughput of C&D waste across the four boroughs, at 420,275 tonnes per year, now exceeds forecast C&D arisings at the end of the plan period in 2036 (414,380 tonnes per annum) by +5,895, where there was previously an estimated shortfall of 172,698 tonnes per annum.

Site appraisal 3.18 Following the preparation of the Technical Paper by Anthesis consultants, the four partner Boroughs carried out further detailed site appraisal work for all potential sites within the plan area in order to identify a range of suitable, developable waste sites for inclusion in the new SLWP. The methodology used was closely based on policy and guidance set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the National Planning Policy for Waste (NPPW) and the 2020 London Plan.

3.19 The NPPF’s approach to site appraisal is based on the following three elements which determine whether a site is considered to be ‘developable’: (i) suitability – the site is appropriate in terms of planning policy and associated designations; (ii) availability – the site has no land ownership constraints; (iii) viability – the site could be considered financial viable to develop.

Suitability 3.20 The suitability criteria used for the purpose of appraising potential waste sites are set out below in Table 3.3 together with the scoring system. These are derived from the criteria set out in Appendix B of the NPPW but incorporating amendments to reflect the context of the plan area.

3.21 Some of the potential waste sites are quite large and so are surrounded by a lot of different use and this creates a bias against large sites where proximity criteria are involved. Consequently, large sites are only marked down for proximity or being adjacent to sensitive receptors where the land use has a significant boundary with the site.

3.22 The maximum suitability score for any particular site is 50.

Table 3.3 Site Suitability Criteria and Scoring

Suitability Criterion Used Scoring Systrem Relevant NPPF Definition Waater quality (SPZ)

5 - Not in SPZ12 or in SPZ3 3 - In SPZ2 1 - In SPZ1

(1) water quality

Fllood risk management (Flood)

5 - Flood Zone 1 3 - Flood Zone 2 1- Flood Zone 3

(aii) flood risk management

Metropolitan Open Land and Green Belt (MOL/GB)

5 - Not adjacent to MOL/Green Belt 3 - Adjacent to MOL/Green Belt 1 - In MOL/Green Belt

(c) visual impacts

Site of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC)

5 - Not adjacent to a SINC 3 - Adjacent to a SINC 1 - Within a SINC

(d) nature conservation

Conservation Area or SScheduled Ancient Monument (CA/SAM)

5 - Not adjacent to a CA or SAM 3 - Adjacent to a CA or SAM 1 - Within a CA

(e) historic environment

Strategic Road Network (SRN)

5 - Direct access to Strategic Road Network 3 - Access to Strategic Road Network without

(f) traffic and access

12 Source Protection Zone

Suitability Criterion Used Scoring Systrem Relevant NPPF Definition going through residential areas 1 - Access to Strategic Road Network going through residential areas

Sustainable Transport (Sus Trans)

5 - Access to a sustainable transport network 1 - No access to sustainable transport network

(fii) traffic and access

Sensitive Receptors (Sens Rec)

15 - Not adjacent to sensitive receptors (residential, schools, hospitals) 7 - Adjacent to sensitive receptors (residential, schools, hospitals)

(g) air emissions (h) odours (i) vermin and birds; (j) noise, light & vibration; (k) litter (l) land use conflict

SUITABILITY SCORE MAXIMUM 50

Availability and Viability 3.23 The scoring system used for appraising site availability and viability is set out below in Table 9.2. The maximum respectives scores for each of these criteria is 25, making 50 in total.

3.24 An existing operational waste site scores highly because its very existence is considered to provide availability and viability. Large industrial areas which already include existing waste facilities score more highly than those which do not include existing waste facilities. The rationale for this is to reflect the fact that industrial land values vary across the plan area and those estates which are lower in value tend to have waste facilities which are more marginal in terms of profitability. This is considered to be a more reliable indicator of viability and availability than a notional viability assessments.

Table 9.2 Site Availability and Viability Criteria

Suitability Criterion Used Scoring System

Availability 25 - Existing site 15 - Existing sites within or nearby 5 - No existing sites within or nearby

AVAILABILITY SCORE MAXIMUM 25

Viability 25 - Existing site 15 - Existing sites within or nearby 5 - No existing site within or nearby

VIABILITY SCORE MAXIMUM 25

Total combined score 50

Overall site appraisal score 3.25 For each site appraised, a total score out of 100 was obtained by adding the sub-totals for site suitability (50), availability (25) and viability (25).

3.26 The results of appraisal for all potential waste sites considered in the preparation of the Draft SLWP are presented alongside the detailed flood risk assessment and sequential test conclusions in Section 4 of this document (see Table 4.1).

4. Sequential testing of potential waste sites4.1. Table 4.1 presents the results of the Sequential Test for all potential waste sites and broad locations considered as part of the preparation of the Draft South London Waste Plan (SLWP). This includes an assessment of fluvial flood risk affecting each site using the Environment Agency’s (EA) Flood Map for Planning13 to map the extent of EA Flood Zones 1, 2 and 3 (in terms of the percentage of each site at ‘low’, ‘medium’ and ‘high’ risk respectively) and sequential test conclusions.

4.2. The flood risk assessment and sequential test conclusions are presented alongside the site appraisal scores indicating the suitability, availability and viability of each site.

4.3. In determining whether to carry forward each potential waste site or broad location for inclusion in the the Draft SLWP, the four boroughs took account a number of important factors alongside flood risk issues. These included:

the need for the SLWP to designate further waste sites and management capacity in addition toexisting waste sites which are currently in operation in the plan area, As outlined above in Section 3, existing capacity for managing housing and commercial & industrial (HCI) waste within South London (946,345 tpa) already exceeds the 2036 apportionment (929,750 tpa) by+16,595 tpa) and existing C&D capacity (420,275) exceeds forecast C&D arisings in 2036(414,380 tpa) by +5,895 tpa;the suitability, availability and viability of each potential waste site or broad area as evidencedthrough the site appraisal process (see scores below in Table 4.1);the need to provide sufficient land for (non-waste) employment uses within industrial locations(this is particularly important in LB Sutton, where the strategic demand for industrial, logisticsand related uses is anticipated to be the strong ; andfor existing waste management operations which are located within areas of higher flood risk andwhere a planning permission has already been granted, the fact that a site specific Flood RiskAssessment (FRA) will already have been prepared and approved by the relevant local planningauthority.

4.4. Currently operational waste management sites within the plan area which are proposed to be carried forward and safeguarded in the Draft SLWP (Submission Version) are shaded in green. Where a particular site, or broad location, has been deleted from further consideration, the reasons for this decision are set out in the final column of Table 4.1

13 the EA’s Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea) is available at https://flood-map-for-planning.service.gov.uk/

PA

GE

31

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL A

ND

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T FO

R PO

TEN

TIAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

WIT

H T

HE

SLW

P AR

EA

Tabl

e 4.

1: L

ow R

isk:

Pot

entia

l site

s an

d br

oad

loca

tions

at

low

ris

k of

floo

ding

(lo

cate

d w

holly

in F

lood

Zon

e 1)

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y Vi

a-bi

lity

TOTA

L SC

ORE

Vu

lner

-ab

ility

Fl

ood

Zone

1

Floo

d Zo

ne 2

Fl

ood

Zone

3 FL

OO

D

RISK

Fl

ood

Zone

Ext

ents

Af

fect

ing

the

Site

Si

te CC

1:

Able

Was

te

Serv

ices

42

Im

peria

l W

ay,

CR0

4R

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r &

Tr

eatm

ent

–C&

D)

0.45

36

25

86

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Site

cur

rent

ly in

use

for

was

te

purp

oses

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘less

vu

lner

able

’ to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re a

pplic

atio

ns fo

r w

aste

use

s (i

ncud

ing

site

inte

nsifi

catio

n).

SITE

C1

IS TT

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

C4:

D

ays

Aggr

egat

es

Purle

y D

epot

, St

atio

n Ya

rd,

Appr

oach

Ro

ad,

Purle

y,

CR8

2AL

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r &

Tr

eatm

ent

–C&

D)

2.0

36

25

86

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pu

rpos

es w

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘lle

ss

vuln

erab

le’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

C4

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

14 S

ee S

ectio

n 9

of S

usta

inab

ility

App

rais

al R

epor

t on

‘Ide

ntify

ing

and

Appr

aisi

ng W

aste

Site

s’ fo

r fu

ll de

tails

of t

he o

utco

me

of s

ite a

ppra

isal

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

32

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

C6:

Fi

sher

s Fa

rm

Reus

e an

d Re

cycl

ing

Cent

re

Nor

th D

owns

Ro

ad,

New

Ad

ding

ton,

CR

0 0L

F CR

OYD

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r [H

ouse

hold

W

aste

Am

enity

Si

te]

– H

CI)

0.2

28

25

78

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

C6

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

RROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

C7:

H

enry

Woo

ds

Was

te M

gmt

La

nd A

dj T

o U

nit

9, M

ill

Lane

Tra

ding

Es

t, C

R0 4

AA

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r an

d Tr

eatm

ent

0.7

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

C7

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

C8:

N

ew E

ra

Met

als,

51

Im

peria

l W

ay

CR0

4RR

CR

OYD

ON

Exis

ting

(Rec

yclin

g an

d Re

use

– H

CI)

0.4

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

C8

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

PA

GE

33

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

C9:

Pe

ar T

ree

Farm

Fe

athe

rbed

La

ne,

CR0

9AA

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

HCI

and

C&

D)

1.8

32

25

82

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re a

pplic

atio

ns fo

r w

aste

use

s (i

ncud

ing

for

inte

nsifi

catio

n).

SITE

C9

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

C11

: Sa

fety

-Kle

en

Uni

t 6b

, Re

dlan

ds,

Coul

sdon

, CR

5 2H

T CR

OYD

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

Haz

ardo

us)

0.3

40

25

90

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘mor

e vu

lner

able

’ to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng p

ropo

sals

for

site

in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

C11

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

C2:

Cr

oydo

n Ca

r Sp

ares

,

111

Aure

lia

Road

,

CR0

3BF

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Rec

yclin

g an

d re

use

– H

CI a

nd

haza

rdou

s)

0.05

30

5

5 40

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

LOW

FLO

OD

RIS

K,

SITE

C2

WAS

DEL

ETED

FRO

M

FURT

HER

CO

NSI

DER

ATIO

N

FOLL

OW

ING

TH

E SL

WP

‘ISSU

ES A

ND

PR

EFER

RED

OPT

ION

S’ S

TAG

E BE

CAU

SE:

IT

IS C

LOSE

D;

IT

IS L

OCA

TED

DIR

ECTL

Y AD

JACE

NT

TO T

WO

DW

ELLI

NG

S;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OR

FORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

34

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

C3:

Cu

rley

Skip

H

ire,

rear

of 6

4 N

orth

woo

d Rd

CR

7 8H

Q

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

0.05

34

5

5 44

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

LOW

FLO

OD

RIS

K,

SITE

C3

WAS

DEL

ETED

FRO

M

FURT

HER

CO

NSI

DER

ATIO

N

FOLL

OW

ING

TH

E SL

WP

‘ISSU

ES A

ND

PR

EFER

RED

OPT

ION

S’ S

TAG

E BE

CAU

SE::

II

T IS

CU

RREN

TLY

CON

TRIB

UTI

NG

N

OTH

ING

TO

TH

E CO

MBI

NED

AP

PORT

ION

MEN

T TA

RGET

S;

IT

IS L

OCA

TED

DIR

ECTL

Y AD

JACE

NT

TO E

XIST

ING

AN

D

PRO

POSE

D R

ESID

ENTI

AL U

SES;

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Purle

y W

ay

Nor

th S

IL

(Par

t 1)

CRO

YDO

N

SIL

71.4

(t

otal

ar

ea)

44

5 5

54

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e 2.

1), t

his

area

is c

onsi

dere

d un

suita

ble/

una

vaila

ble

for

futu

re

was

te u

se d

ue t

o its

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6 (4

14,3

80 t

pa)

by +

5,89

5 tp

a.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

LOW

FLO

OD

RIS

K,

TTHIS

ARE

A H

AS B

EEN

EXC

LUD

ED

FRO

M T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

SIN

CE:

IIT

IS U

NSU

ITAB

LE/

UN

AVAI

LABL

E FO

R W

ASTE

USE

S; A

ND

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T OO

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

PA

GE

35

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Purle

y W

ay

Sout

h SI

L

(Par

t 1)

15

CRO

YDO

N

SIL

33.3

(t

otal

ar

ea o

f SI

L)

38

15

68

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e 2.

1), i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e/

unav

aila

ble

for

futu

re w

aste

use

e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity e

xcee

ds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

LOW

FLO

OD

RIS

K,

T THIS

ARE

A H

AS B

EEN

EXC

LUD

ED

FRO

M T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

SIN

CE:

IIT

IS U

NSU

ITAB

LE/

UN

AVAI

LABL

E FO

R W

ASTE

USE

S; A

ND

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T

Purle

y W

ay

Sout

h St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IL)

-Par

t 2

CRO

YDO

N

SIL

33.3

(t

otal

ar

ea o

f SI

L)

38

15

68

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e 2.

1), i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e/

unav

aila

ble

for

futu

re w

aste

use

e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity e

xcee

ds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

LOW

FLO

OD

RIS

K,

TTHIS

ARE

A H

AS B

EEN

EXC

LUD

ED

FRO

M T

HEB

DRA

FT S

LWP

SIN

CE:

IIT

IS U

NSU

ITAB

LE/

UN

AVAI

LABL

E FO

R W

ASTE

USE

S; A

ND

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T

15

Pur

ley

Way

, Ly

sand

er R

oad

and

Impe

rial W

ay I

ndus

tria

l Are

a

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

36

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Mar

lpit

Lane

(U

llsw

ater

In

dust

rial

Esta

te)

CRO

YDO

N

SIL

20.0

42

15

72

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

site

is a

t at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

floo

ding

.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FFUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Thor

nton

Ro

ad

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

CRO

YDO

N

LSIL

4.

7 38

5

5 48

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

site

is a

t at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

floo

ding

.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

PA

GE

37

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Uni

on R

oad

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

CRO

YDO

N

LSIL

3.

3 38

5

5 48

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEN

T OO

R FU

TURE

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S

Sels

don

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

CRO

YDO

N

LSIL

6.

7 36

5

5 46

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

:

IIT

IS I

NH

EREN

TLY

LESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LEE’

AND

‘VIA

BLE’

CO

MPA

RED

TO

CU

RREN

TLY

OPE

RATI

ON

AL S

ITES

;

IT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FFUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

38

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Glo

uces

ter

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te (

East

) CR

OYD

ON

LSIL

2.

6 44

5

5 54

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FFUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS

Glo

uces

ter

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

(Wes

t)

CRO

YDO

N

LSIL

1.

5 38

5

5 48

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEN

T OO

R FFU

TURE

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S

PA

GE

39

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Vulc

an W

ay

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

CRO

YDO

N

LSIL

9.

1 28

5

5 38

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

are

a is

at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

floo

ding

.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ O

R ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEN

T OO

R FU

TURE

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S Si

te K

2:

Gen

uine

So

lutio

ns,

Solu

tions

H

ouse

, U

nit

1A,

223

Hoo

k Ri

se S

outh

, KT

6 7L

D

KIN

GST

ON

Exis

ting

(Rec

yclin

g an

d re

use

– H

CI)

0.3

46

25

96

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

K2

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

K3:

Ki

ngst

on R

&R

Cent

re

Chap

el M

ill

Road

, of

f Vi

llier

s Rd

, KT

1 3G

Z

KIN

GST

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

HCI

)

0.4

38

25

88

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

K3

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

40

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

K4:

Ki

ngst

on

Was

te

Tran

sfer

St

atio

n Ch

apel

Mill

Ro

ad,

off

Villi

ers

Road

, KT

1 3G

Z KI

NG

STO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

HCI

)

1.6

38

25

88

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

K4

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Barw

ell

Busi

ness

Par

k St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IIL)

KIN

GST

ON

SIL

- 48

5

5 58

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEN

T OO

R FU

TURE

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S

PA

GE

41

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Ches

sing

ton

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IIL)

KIN

GST

ON

SIL

- 36

15

66

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEN

T OO

R FU

TURE

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S.

Cam

brid

ge

Roa/

H

ampd

en

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

KIN

GST

ON

LSIL

-

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Th

is b

road

are

a is

at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

42

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Canb

ury

Park

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

KIN

GST

ON

LSIL

-

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Th

is b

road

are

a is

at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Re

d Li

on

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

KI

NG

STO

N

LSIL

-

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Th

is b

road

are

a is

at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

PA

GE

43

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

St G

eorg

e’s

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

KI

NG

STO

N

LSIL

-

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Th

is b

road

are

a is

at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Si

lver

glad

e Bu

sine

ss P

ark

KI

NG

STO

N

LSIL

-

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Th

is b

road

are

a is

at

‘llow

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

So

uth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

exc

eeds

fore

cas

aris

ings

in 2

036.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

44

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M1:

B&

T@W

ork

Uni

t 5c

, W

andl

e W

ay,

CR4

4NA

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r an

d re

cycl

ing

– H

CI)

0.06

44

25

94

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Site

cur

rent

ly in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

sew

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

ee’to

floo

d ris

k.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M1

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

M4:

G

arth

Roa

d Re

-use

&

Recy

clin

g Ce

ntre

,

66-6

9 Am

enity

Way

, G

arth

Roa

d,

SM4

4AX

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Hou

seho

ld

Was

te

Amen

ity

Site

–

Exis

ting)

0.7

36

25

86

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘less

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M4

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

M5:

G

arth

Roa

d Tr

ansf

er

Stat

ion,

66

-69

Amen

ity W

ay,

Gar

th R

oad,

SM

4 4A

X M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r -

LA

colle

cted

w

aste

and

ha

zard

ous)

0.45

36

25

86

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Site

cur

rent

ly in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

sew

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘ ‘

mor

e vu

lner

able

’ to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M5

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

PA

GE

45

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M7:

LM

D W

aste

M

anag

emen

t (A

bbey

Ind

Es

tate

),

Will

ow L

ane,

CR

4 4N

A M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r w

ith

trea

tmen

t –

C&D

)

0.06

44

25

94

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Site

cur

rent

ly in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

sew

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘ ‘

mor

e vu

lner

able

’ to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M7

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

M9:

M

agui

re S

kips

(W

andl

e W

ay)

Stor

age

Yard

W

andl

e W

ay,

CR4

4NB

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

)

0.2

34

25

84

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M9

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

M10

: Po

wer

day

(Wei

r Co

urt)

36

Wei

r Co

urt,

SW

19 8

UG

M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

)

0.3

ha

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M10

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

46

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M11

: M

orde

n Tr

ansf

er

Stat

ion

Amen

ity W

ay,

SM4

4AX

M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

and

H

CI)

0.8

34

25

84

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M11

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

M12

: N

JB

Recy

clin

g

77 W

eir

Road

,

SW19

8U

G

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

)

0.3

36

25

86

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M12

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Site

M13

: O

ne W

aste

Cl

eara

nce

U

nit

2 Ab

bey

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

, 24

Will

ow L

ane,

CR

4 4N

A M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r an

d Re

cycl

ing

– C&

D a

nd

HCI

)

0.1

44

25

94

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M13

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

PA

GE

47

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M14

: Re

ston

Was

te

Tran

sfer

and

Re

cove

ry

Uni

t 6,

W

eir

Road

SW

19 8

UG

M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

0.43

36

25

86

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Site

cur

rent

ly in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

sew

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘lle

ss v

ulne

rabl

ee’to

floo

d ris

k.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

M14

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

M18

WWan

dle

Was

te

Man

agem

ent

Uni

t 7,

Abb

ey

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

, W

illow

Lan

e,

CR4

4NA

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

Haz

ardo

us)

0.07

44

25

94

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Site

cur

rent

ly in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

sew

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘m

ore

vuln

erab

le’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

haza

rdou

s or

any

oth

er w

aste

use

s (i

ncud

ing

for

site

inte

nsifi

catio

n).

SITE

M19

IS

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP

Dun

dona

ld

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

3.

7 36

5

5 46

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

HCI

in S

outh

Lon

don

(946

,345

tpa

) al

read

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36

appo

rtio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

itex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

48

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Gap

Roa

d In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

3.

8 38

5

5 48

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

HCI

in S

outh

Lon

don

(946

,345

tpa

) al

read

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36

appo

rtio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

itex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TTH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FFUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Ra

inbo

w

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

(R

ayne

s Pa

rk)

MER

TON

LSIL

3.

2 34

5

5 44

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

HCI

in S

outh

Lon

don

(946

,345

tpa

) al

read

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36

appo

rtio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

itex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

T TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FFUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

PA

GE

49

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

S1:

77

7 Re

cycl

ing

Cent

re,

15

4a

Bedd

ingt

on

Lane

CR

0 4T

E SU

TTO

N

Exis

ting

(Rec

ylin

g an

d Re

use

– H

CI a

nd

C&D

)

1.0

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘less

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S1

IS T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P.

Site

S2:

Be

ddin

gton

Fa

rmla

nds

Ener

gy

Reco

very

Fa

cilit

y (E

RF)

105

Bedd

ingt

oLa

ne C

R0 4

TD

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

(Ene

rgy

from

Was

te–

HCI

)

5.8

34

25

84

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng p

ropo

sals

for

site

in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S2

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWPP.

Site

S3:

Ca

nnon

H

ygie

ne, U

nit

4, B

eddi

ngto

n La

ne I

ndus

tria

Esta

te,

109-

131

Bedd

ingt

on

Lane

CR

0 4T

G

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

Haz

ardo

us)

0.2

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘ ‘m

ore

vuln

erab

le’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

haza

rdou

s or

any

oth

er w

aste

use

s (i

ncud

ing

prop

osal

s fo

r si

te

inte

nsifi

catio

n).

SITE

S3

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

50

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

S4:

Cr

oydo

n Tr

ansf

er

Stat

ion

Ende

avou

r W

ay,

Bedd

ingt

on

Farm

Roa

d,

CR0

4TD

SU

TTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

HCI

)

0.7

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘less

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng p

ropo

sals

for

site

in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S4

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P...

Site

S6:

H

ydro

Cl

eans

ing,

H

ill H

ouse

, Be

ddin

gton

Fa

rm R

oad

CR0

4XB

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r &

Tr

eatm

ent

- w

aste

-w

ater

/ CD

&E)

0.2

44

25

94

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘less

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

clud

ing

prop

osal

s fo

r si

te

inte

nsifi

catio

n).

SITE

S6

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P..

Site

S7:

Ki

mpt

on P

ark

Way

Civ

ic

Amen

ity S

ite

Kim

pton

Par

k W

ay S

M3

9QH

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

(Civ

ic

Amen

ity

Site

– H

CI)

0.4

44

25

94

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

clud

ing

prop

osal

s fo

r si

te

inte

nsifi

catio

n).

SITE

S7

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP.

PA

GE

51

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

S8

: Ki

ng C

oncr

ete

12

4 Be

ddin

gton

La

ne C

R0 4

YZ

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

)

0.5

30

25

80

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pu

rpos

es w

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘lle

ss

vuln

erab

le’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng s

ite in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S8

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP.

Site

S9:

Pr

emie

r Sk

ip

Hire

U

nit

12,

Sand

iford

Ro

ad,

SM3

9RD

SU

TTO

N

Exis

ting

0.1

46

25

96

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pu

rpos

es w

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘lle

ss

vuln

erab

le’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng p

ropo

sals

for

site

in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S9

THER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N T

HE

DRA

FT S

LWP.

Site

S10

:

Rave

n Re

cycl

ing

Uni

t 8-

9,

Ende

avou

r W

ay,

Bedd

-in

gton

Far

m

Rd, C

R0 4

TR

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

0.3

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng fo

r si

te in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S10

TH

EREF

ORE

PRO

POSE

D

FOR

INCL

USI

ON

IN

DRA

FT S

LWP.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

52

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

S11

:

TGM

En

viro

nmen

tal

112

Bedd

ingt

on

Lane

, CR

0 4T

D

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

0.2

40

25

90

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

(alth

ough

di

rect

ly

adja

cent

)

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng fo

r si

te in

tens

ifica

tion)

.SI

TE S

11 T

HER

EFO

RE P

ROPO

SED

FO

R IN

CLU

SIO

N I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P.

Site

S12

: Co

untr

y W

aste

Ski

p H

ire16

79

-85

Bedd

ingt

on

Lane

, CR

0 4TH

SU

TTO

N

Exis

ting

2.8

36

25

86

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

LOW

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

whi

ch a

re c

lass

ified

as

‘lless

vul

nera

blee’

to fl

ood

risk.

Site

at

low

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

uses

(in

cudi

ng fo

r si

te in

tens

ifica

tion)

.

SITE

S12

TH

EREF

ORE

PRO

POSE

D

FOR

INCL

USI

ON

IN

DRA

FT S

LWP.

Impe

rial

Way

St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IL)

SUTT

ON

SIL

18.8

40

5

5 50

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

Whi

le t

his

loca

tion

is a

t llo

w r

isk

of

flood

ing,

it h

as n

ot b

een

carr

ied

forw

ard

in t

he D

raft

SLW

P si

nce:

i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e fo

r w

aste

us

e du

e to

its

rede

velo

pmen

t /a

lloca

tion

for

othe

r us

es

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036.

SITE

NO

T N

EED

ED A

ND

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES

AND

TH

EREF

ORE

EXC

LUD

ED F

ROM

SLW

P

16

site

intr

oduc

ed fo

llow

ing

the

SLW

P ‘Is

sues

and

Pre

ferr

ed O

ptio

ns s

tage

’

PA

GE

53

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

114

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Croy

don

Road

In

dust

rial

Area

SU

TTO

N

LSIL

0.

9 38

5

5 48

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

HCI

in S

outh

Lon

don

(946

,345

tpa

) al

read

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36

appo

rtio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

itex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

G

ande

r G

reen

Lan

e/

Abbo

tts

Road

SU

TTO

N

LSIL

0.

7 36

5

5 46

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

HCI

in S

outh

Lon

don

(946

,345

tpa

) al

read

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36

appo

rtio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

itex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

54

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL114

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Plum

pton

W

ay T

radi

ng

Esta

te

SUTT

ON

LSIL

1.

1 34

5

5 44

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

100%

0%

LO

W

This

bro

ad a

rea

is a

t ‘llo

w’ r

isk

of

flood

ing.

How

ever

, ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

HCI

in S

outh

Lon

don

(946

,345

tpa

) al

read

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36

appo

rtio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

itex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6.

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘LO

W’ F

LOO

D R

ISK,

TH

IS A

REA

HAS

BEE

N E

XCLU

DED

FR

OM

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: II

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS ‘A

VAIL

ABLEE

’ AN

D ‘V

IABL

E’ C

OM

PARE

D T

O

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

ENT

OOR

FUTU

RE C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

.

PA

GE

55

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

Tabl

e 4.

2: M

ediu

m R

isk:

Pot

entia

l site

s an

d br

oad

loca

tions

at

med

ium

ris

k of

floo

ding

(w

holly

or

part

ly in

Flo

od Z

one

2)

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

117

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

C5B:

Fact

ory

Lane

R&

R Ce

ntre

Fa

ctor

y La

ne,

CR0

3RL

CR

OYD

ON

Exis

ting

(Hou

seho

ld

Was

te

Amen

ity

Site

– H

CI)

0.3

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

0%

10

0%

MED

IUM

Si

te in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

ses

whi

ch

are

‘less

vul

nera

ble’

to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(90%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

MED

IUM

RIS

K O

F FL

OOO

DIN

G,

SITE

C5B

IN

CLU

DED

IN

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT:

I

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE

USE

S IN

TH

E SL

WP

2012

& H

AS

THER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

TED

TO

TH

E SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

ALRE

ADY;

HH

AS P

LAN

NIN

G P

ERM

ISSI

ON

AN

D

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECT

TO A

SIT

E SP

ECIF

IC F

RA;

AND

II

S CU

RREN

TLY

OPE

RATI

ON

AL.

Site

C13

: So

lo W

ood

Recy

clin

g18

Fact

ory

Lane

, CR

0 3R

L

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Woo

d re

cycl

ing

– H

CI)

0.2

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

0%

10

0%

MED

IUM

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(100

% o

f are

a in

FZ

2).

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

MED

IUM

RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

C13

IN

CLU

DED

IN

TH

E D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT:

AA

LREA

DY

HAS

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FRA

; II

S CU

RREN

TLY

OPE

RATI

ON

AL.

17

See

Sec

tion

9 of

Sus

tain

abili

ty A

ppra

isal

Rep

ort

on ‘I

dent

ifyin

g an

d Ap

prai

sing

Was

te S

ites’

for

full

deta

ils o

f the

out

com

e of

site

app

rais

al

18 s

ite in

trod

uced

follo

win

g th

e is

sues

and

pre

ferr

ed o

ptio

ns s

tage

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

56

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL117

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Purle

y W

ay

Nor

th

Stra

tegi

c In

dust

rial

Loca

tion

(SIL

) -

Pt 2

CR

OYD

ON

SIL

71.4

(t

otal

ar

ea)

44

5 5

54

Less

vu

lner

able

80

%

20%

0%

M

EDIU

M

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘med

ium

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g (2

0% in

FZ

2);

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e 2.

1), t

his

area

is c

onsi

dere

d un

suita

ble/

una

vaila

ble

for

futu

re

was

te u

se d

ue t

o its

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

MED

IUM

FLO

OD

RIS

K;

IIT

IS U

NSU

ITAB

LE/

UN

AVAI

LABL

E FO

R W

ASTE

USE

S; A

ND

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED.

PA

GE

57

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

117

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y Vi

a-bi

lity

TOTA

L SC

ORE

Vu

lner

-ab

ility

Fl

ood

Zone

1

Floo

d Zo

ne 2

Fl

ood

Zone

3 FL

OO

D

RISK

Fl

ood

Zone

Ext

ents

Af

fect

ing

the

Site

Si

te M

2:

Euro

pean

M

etal

Re

cycl

ing

23 E

llis

Road

, W

illow

Lan

e In

dust

rial

Esta

te,

CR4

4HX

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Rec

yclin

g an

d Re

use

–H

CI)

1.0

38

25

88

Less

vu

lner

able

10

%

90%

0%

M

EDIU

MSi

te in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

ses

whi

ch

are

‘less

vul

nera

ble’

to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(90%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M2

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

IIS

DES

IGN

ATED

FO

R W

ASTE

USE

SIN

TH

E SL

WP

2012

& H

ASTH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

OTH

E SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

ALRE

ADY;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECT

TO A

SIT

E SP

ECIF

IC F

RA;

AND

IIS C

URR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

..Si

te M

3:

Dea

dman

Co

nfid

entia

l 35

Will

ow

Lane

, CR

4 4N

A M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Rec

yclin

g –

HCI

)

0.4

38

25

88

Less

vu

lner

able

0%

10

0%

MED

IUM

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(100

% o

f are

a in

FZ

2).

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M3

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

IIS

DES

IGN

ATED

FO

R W

ASTE

USE

SIN

TH

E SL

WP

2012

& H

ASTH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

OTH

E SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

ALRE

ADY;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECT

TO A

SIT

E SP

ECIF

IC F

RA;

AND

IIS C

URR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

58

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL117

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M6:

G

eorg

e Ki

lloug

hery

Lt

d 41

Will

ow

Lane

, CR

4 4N

A M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

)

0.8

32

25

82

Less

vu

lner

able

40

%

60%

0%

M

EDIU

MSi

te in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

ses

whi

ch

are

‘less

vul

nera

ble’

to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(60%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M6

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

II

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE U

SES

IN T

HE

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O

THE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FRA

; AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

Si

te M

8:

LMD

Was

te

Man

agem

ent

(W

illow

Lan

e)

32 W

illow

La

ne,

CR4

4NA

M

ERTO

N

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

C&D

)

0.07

38

25

88

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

0%

100%

0%

M

EDIU

MSi

te in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

ses

whi

ch

are

‘less

vul

nera

ble’

to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(8%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M8

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

II

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE U

SES

IN T

HE

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O

THE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T (F

RA);

AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

PA

GE

59

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

117

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M15

Ri

vers

ide

AD

Faci

lity

43 W

illow

La

ne,

CR4

4NA

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Man

age-

men

t of

m

ixed

ga

rden

&

kitc

hen

was

te –

An

aero

bic

Dig

estio

n)

0.5

32

25

82

Less

vu

lner

able

92

%

8%

0%

MED

IUM

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(8%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M15

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

II

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE U

SES

IN T

HE

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O

THE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T (F

RA);

AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

. Si

te M

16:

Rive

rsid

e Bi

o-Tr

eatm

ent

43 W

illow

La

ne,

CR4

4NA

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Com

pos-

ting

– H

CI)

0.4

32

25

82

Less

vu

lner

able

92

%

8%

0%

MED

IUM

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(8%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M16

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

II

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE U

SES

IN T

HE

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O

THE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FRA

; AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

60

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL117

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

M17

U

K an

d Eu

rope

an

(Ran

ns)

Cons

truc

tion

Uni

t 3-

5,

39 W

illow

La

ne,

CR4

8NA

MER

TON

Exis

ting

(Tre

atm

ent

of C

&D

to

prod

uce

soil)

0.5

38

25

88

Less

vu

lner

able

0%

10

0%

MED

IUM

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(100

% o

f are

a in

FZ

2).

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M17

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

I

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE U

SES

IN T

HE

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O

THE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FRA

; AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

. Pr

ince

G

eorg

e’s

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

SIL

6.2

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

85

%

15%

0%

M

EDIU

M t

his

site

is a

t ‘m

ediu

m’ r

isk

of

flood

ing

(20%

in F

Z 2)

; e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6 (4

14,3

80 t

pa)

by +

5,89

5 tp

a.

THIS

SIT

E H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: II

T IS

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;

IT

IS L

ESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

I

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

MM

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

PA

GE

61

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

117

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Dur

nsfo

rd

Road

(A)

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

2.

4 40

5

5 50

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

98%

2%

0%

M

EDIU

M t

his

area

is a

t ‘m

ediu

m’ r

isk

of

flood

ing

(20%

in F

Z 2)

; a

risin

g fr

om s

ite a

ppra

isal

(Ta

ble

2.1)

, it

is c

onsi

dere

d un

suita

ble/

un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

a ex

istin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6 TTH

ISS

AREA

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N

E EXCL

UD

ED F

ROM

DRA

FT S

LWP

SIN

CEE:

IT

IS A

T M

EDIU

M F

OO

D R

ISK;

II

T IS

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES;

AN

D

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OOR

FORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S..

Stre

atha

m

Road

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

5.

3 40

5

5 50

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

80%

20

%

0%

MED

IUM

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘med

ium

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g (2

0% in

FZ

2);

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: II

T IS

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;

IT

IS L

ESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

62

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL117

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Nel

son

Trad

ing

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

2.

3 38

5

5 48

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

75%

25

%

0%

MED

IUM

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘med

ium

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g (2

5% in

FZ

2);

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: II

T IS

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;

IT

IS L

ESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS.

Si

te S

5:

Hin

ton

Skip

s Re

ar o

f 112

Be

ddin

gton

La

ne,

CR0

4YZ

SUTT

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r an

d tr

eatm

ent

of s

kip

was

te –

C&

D)

0.6

40

25

90

Less

vu

lner

able

85

%

15%

0%

M

EDIU

MSi

te in

use

for

was

te p

urpo

ses

whi

ch

are

‘less

vul

nera

ble’

to

flood

ris

k.

Site

at

med

ium

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(15%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ RIS

K O

F FL

OO

DIN

G,

SITE

M16

HAS

BEE

N

INCL

UD

ED I

N D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT::

II

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED F

OR

WAS

TE U

SES

IN T

HE

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O

THE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HHAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FRA

; AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

.

PA

GE

63

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

117

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Bedd

ingt

on

Stra

tegi

c In

dust

rial

Area

(SI

L)

SUTT

ON

SIL

105. 8

26

15

56

Less

vu

lner

able

85

%

15%

0%

M

EDIU

M t

his

area

is a

t ‘m

ediu

m’ r

isk

of

flood

ing

(20%

in F

Z 2)

; a

risin

g fr

om s

ite a

ppra

isal

(Ta

ble

2.1)

, it

is c

onsi

dere

d un

suita

ble/

un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

MED

IUM

FLO

OD

RIS

K;

IIT

IS U

NSU

ITAB

LE/

UN

AVAI

LABL

E FO

R W

ASTE

USE

S; A

ND

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS

Hac

kbrid

ge

Indu

stria

l Ar

ea

SUTT

ON

LSIL

1.

3 32

5

5 42

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

40%

60

%

0%

MED

IUM

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘med

ium

’ ris

k of

flo

odin

g (6

0% in

FZ

2);

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFTT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: II

T IS

AT

‘MED

IUM

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;

IT

IS L

ESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

64

PA

GE

65

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

Tabl

e 4.

3: H

igh

Risk

: Po

tent

ial s

ites

and

broa

d lo

catio

ns a

t hi

gh r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng (

loca

ted

who

lly o

r pa

rtly

in F

lood

Zon

e 3)

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

119

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

C5A

: Fa

ctor

y La

ne

Tran

sfer

St

atio

n Fa

ctor

y La

ne,

CR0

3RL

CR

OYD

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

HCI

)

1.2

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

0%

95

%

5%

HIG

H

Site

at

hhigh

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(5%

of a

rea

in F

Z 2)

.

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘HIG

H’ R

ISK

OF

FLO

OD

ING

, SI

TE C

5A H

AS B

EEN

IN

CLU

DED

IN

DRA

FT S

LWP

SIN

CE I

T::

IS

DES

IGN

ATED

FO

R W

ASTE

USE

S IN

EXI

STIN

G S

LWP

2012

& H

AS

THER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

TED

TO

TH

E SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

ALRE

ADY;

H

AS P

LAN

NIN

G P

ERM

ISSI

ON

AN

D

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECT

TO A

SIT

E SP

ECIF

IC F

RA;

AND

II

S CU

RREN

TLY

OPE

RATI

ON

AL.

19

See

Sec

tion

9 of

Sus

tain

abili

ty A

ppra

isal

Rep

ort

on ‘I

dent

ifyin

g an

d Ap

prai

sing

Was

te S

ites’

for

full

deta

ils o

f the

out

com

e of

site

app

rais

al

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

66

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL119

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Site

C10

: Pu

rley

Oak

s R&

R Ce

ntre

Br

ight

on R

oad

Purle

y

CR8

2BG

CR

OYD

ON

Exis

ting

(Tra

nsfe

r –

HCI

and

C&

D)

0.2

30

25

80

Less

vu

lner

able

10

%

5%

85%

H

IGH

At

‘hig

h’ rr

isk

of fl

oodi

ng (

5% in

FZ

3).

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘HIG

H’ R

ISK

OF

FLO

OD

ING

, SI

TE C

5A I

S IN

CLU

DED

IN

DRA

FT S

LWP

SIN

CE I

T:

IS

DES

IGN

ATED

IN

TH

E EX

ISTI

NG

SL

WP

2012

& H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE

BEEN

SU

BJEC

TED

TO

TH

E SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

ALRE

ADY;

H

AS P

LAN

NIN

G P

ERM

ISSI

ON

AN

D

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N S

UBJ

ECT

TO A

SIT

E SP

ECIF

IC F

RA;

AND

II

S CU

RREN

TLY

OPE

RATI

ON

AL.

Site

C12

: St

ubbs

Mea

d D

epot

Fa

ctor

y La

ne,

CR0

3RL

CRO

YDO

N

Exis

ting

(Veh

icle

de

pot

rela

ted

to

HH

was

te

colle

ctio

n)

2.7

42

25

92

Less

vu

lner

able

15

%

84%

1%

H

IGH

At

‘hig

h’ rr

isk

of fl

oodi

ng (

1% in

FZ

2).

Site

in u

se fo

r w

aste

pur

pose

s w

hich

ar

e ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

od r

isk.

Exce

ptio

ns T

est

not

requ

ired

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te

ALTH

OU

GH

AT

‘HIG

H’ R

ISK

OF

FLO

OD

ING

, SI

TE C

12 I

S IN

CLU

DED

IN

D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

IT:

I

S D

ESIG

NAT

ED I

N T

HE

EXIS

TIN

G

SLW

P 20

12 &

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BE

EN S

UBJ

ECTE

D T

O T

HE

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T AL

READ

Y;

HAS

PLA

NN

ING

PER

MIS

SIO

N A

ND

H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

SU

BJEC

T TO

A S

ITE

SPEC

IFIC

FRA

; AN

D

IIS

CURR

ENTL

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

.

PA

GE

67

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

119

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Purle

y W

ay

Nor

th

Stra

tegi

c In

dust

rial

Loca

tion

(SIL

) -

Pt 3

CR

OYD

ON

SIL

71.4

(t

otal

ar

ea

of

SIL)

44

5 5

54

Less

vu

lner

able

50

%

30%

20

%

HIG

H

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

(20%

in F

Z 3)

; a

risin

g fr

om s

ite a

ppra

isal

(Ta

ble

2.1)

, it

is c

onsi

dere

d un

suita

ble/

un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

ti onm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

II

T IS

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES;

AN

D

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OOR

FORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S.

Site

K1:

Ch

essi

ngto

n Eq

uest

rian

Cent

re,

Clay

ton

Road

, KT9

1N

N

KIN

GST

ON

Exis

ting

9.9

42

5 5

52

Less

vu

lner

able

10

0%

98%

2%

H

IGH

Si

te c

urre

ntly

in u

se f

or w

aste

pu

rpos

es w

hich

are

cla

ssifi

ed a

s ‘le

ss v

ulne

rabl

e’ t

o flo

odin

g.

Whi

le a

sm

all p

ortio

n of

thi

s si

te is

at

high

ris

k of

fluv

ial f

lood

ing

(2%

with

inFZ

3),

the

Exc

eptio

ns T

est

wou

ld n

ot

be r

equi

red

for

any

futu

re p

lann

ing

appl

icat

ions

for

was

te u

ses.

H

OW

EVER

, SI

TE K

1 W

AS D

ELET

ED

FRO

M F

URT

HER

CO

NSI

DER

ATIO

N

FOLL

OW

ING

TH

E IS

SUES

AN

D

PREF

ERRE

D O

PTIO

NS

STAG

E BE

CAU

SE I

T IS

IN

TEM

PORA

RY U

SE

AND

CLO

SIN

G S

OO

N..

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

68

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL119

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

St J

ohn’

s In

dust

rial

Esta

te

KIN

GST

ON

LSIL

-

38

5 5

48

Less

vu

lner

able

95

%

5%

HIG

H

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

(5%

in F

Z 3)

; e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIIN

GS.

Fa

irfie

ld

Trad

e Pa

rk/

King

smill

Bu

s Pk

3 KI

NG

STO

N

LSIL

-

30

15

60

Less

vu

lner

able

50

%

20%

30

%

HIG

H

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

(30%

in F

Z 3)

; e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS..

PA

GE

69

S

eque

ntia

l Tes

t (F

lood

Ris

k) o

f D

raft

Sou

th L

ondo

n W

aste

Pla

n

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

119

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Lond

on R

oad

Indu

stria

l Es

tate

KI

NG

STO

N

LSIL

-

34

5 5

44

Less

vu

lner

able

45

%

50%

5%

H

IGH

t

his

area

is a

t ‘h

igh’

ris

k of

floo

ding

(5

% in

FZ

3);

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS..

So

uth

Wim

bled

on

Busi

ness

Pa

rk

(Mor

den

Rd)

MER

TON

SIL

31.7

34

5

5 44

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

98%

1%

H

IGH

t

his

area

is a

t ‘h

igh’

ris

k of

floo

ding

(1

% in

FZ

3);

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

I

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEM

T O

R FO

RECA

ST C

&D

ARI

SIN

GS..

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

70

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL119

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Dur

nsfo

rd

Road

St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IL)

MER

TON

SIL

18.5

38

15

68

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

95%

4%

1%

H

IGH

t

his

area

is a

t ‘h

igh’

ris

k of

floo

ding

(1

% in

FZ

3);

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e 2.

1), i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e/

unav

aila

ble

due

to r

edev

elop

men

t /a

lloca

tion

for

othe

r us

es;

e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6 (4

14,3

80 t

pa)

by +

5,89

5 tp

a.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

II

T IS

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES;

AN

D

IT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MMEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OR

FORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S..

Plou

gh L

ane

Stra

tegi

c In

dust

rial

Loca

tion

(SIL

) M

ERTO

N

SIL

13.8

28

15

58

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

5%

20%

75

%

HIG

H

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

(1%

in F

Z 3)

; e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

II

T IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

M

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEEN

T.

PA

GE

71

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

119

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y Vi

a-bi

lity

TOTA

L SC

ORE

Vu

lner

-ab

ility

Fl

ood

Zone

1

Floo

d Zo

ne 2

Fl

ood

Zone

3 FL

OO

D

RISK

Fl

ood

Zone

Ext

ents

Af

fect

ing

the

Site

Bu

rling

ton

Way

(B

ever

ley

Way

) St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

cato

n (S

IL)

MER

TON

SIL

7.3

36

5 5

46

Less

vu

lner

able

0%

98

%

2%

HIG

H

this

are

a is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng(1

% in

FZ

3);

exis

ting

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

thLo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

yex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

:IT

IS

AT ‘H

IGH

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;IT

IS

INH

EREN

TLY

LESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

YO

PERA

TIO

NAL

WAS

TE S

ITES

IT I

S N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

OM

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEEN

T.W

illow

Lan

e St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IL)

MER

TON

SIL

41.3

28

15

58

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

65%

30

%

5%

HIG

H

this

are

a is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng(5

% in

FZ

3);

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e2.

1), i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e/un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t(9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

ndex

istin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

:IT

IS

AT ‘H

IGH

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;IIT

IS

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES;

AN

DIT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OOR

FORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S..

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

72

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL119

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Hal

low

field

W

ay

Stra

tegi

c In

dust

rial

Loca

tion

(SIL

) M

ERTO

N

SIL

7.9

38

5 5

48

Less

vu

lner

able

95

%

4%

1%

HIG

H

thi

s ar

ea is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng

(3%

in F

Z 3)

; e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6 (4

14,3

80 t

pa)

by +

5,89

5 tp

a

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TTO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EENT.

Bu

shey

Roa

d In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

3.

7 42

5

5 52

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

90%

3%

7%

H

IGH

t

his

area

is a

t ‘h

igh’

ris

k of

floo

ding

(7

% in

FZ

3);

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TTO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EENT.

PA

GE

73

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

119

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y Vi

a-bi

lity

TOTA

L SC

ORE

Vu

lner

-ab

ility

Fl

ood

Zone

1

Floo

d Zo

ne 2

Fl

ood

Zone

3 FL

OO

D

RISK

Fl

ood

Zone

Ext

ents

Af

fect

ing

the

Site

Bu

rling

ton

Way

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

(Par

t 1

– M

alde

n W

ay)

MER

TON

LSIL

0.

7 34

5

5 44

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

12%

85

%

3%

HIG

H

at ‘h

igh’

floo

d ris

k (3

% in

FZ

3);

exis

ting

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

thLo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

yex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6(4

14,3

80 t

pa)

by +

5,89

5 tp

a

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

:IT

IS

AT ‘H

IGH

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;IT

IS

INH

EREN

TLY

LESS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

T TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;

IT I

S N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

OM

EET

THE

2036

APP

ORT

ION

MEEN

T.G

arth

Roa

d In

dust

rial

Esta

te

MER

TON

LSIL

9.

4 32

15

62

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

84%

15

%

1%

HIG

H

this

are

a is

at

‘hig

h’ r

isk

of fl

oodi

ng(5

% in

FZ

3);

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e2.

1), i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e/un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t(9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

ndex

istin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EEX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

:IT

IS

AT ‘H

IGH

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;IIT

IS

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES;

AN

DIT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OOR

FORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S..

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

74

SI

TE D

ETAI

LS

SITE

APP

RAIS

AL119

FL

OO

D R

ISK

ASSE

SSM

ENT

SEQ

UEN

TIAL

TES

T O

UTC

OM

E

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y

Via-

bilit

y TO

TAL

SCO

RE

Vuln

er-

abili

ty

Floo

d Zo

ne 1

Fl

ood

Zone

2

Floo

d Zo

ne 3

FLO

OD

RI

SK

Floo

d Zo

ne E

xten

ts

Affe

ctin

g th

e Si

te

Kim

pton

St

rate

gic

Indu

stria

l Lo

catio

n (S

IL)

SUTT

ON

SIL

5.9

34

15

64

Less

vu

lner

able

90

%

5%

4%

HIG

H

at

‘hig

h’ fl

ood

risk

(4%

in F

Z 3)

; a

risin

g fr

om s

ite a

ppra

isal

(Ta

ble

2.1)

, it

is c

onsi

dere

d un

suita

ble/

un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;

exi

stin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

y ex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

e

xist

ing

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

II

T IS

UN

SUIT

ABLE

/ U

NAV

AILA

BLE

FOR

WAS

TE U

SES;

AN

D

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EMT

OR

FFORE

CAST

C&

D A

RISI

NG

S.

Old

field

s Ro

ad

Indu

stria

l Ar

ea

SUTT

ON

LSIL

0.

6 30

5

5 40

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

0%

90%

10

%

HIG

H

at

‘hig

h’ fl

ood

risk

(10%

in F

Z 3)

; e

xist

ing

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

th

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t (9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

nd

exi

stin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6 (4

14,3

80 t

pa)

by +

5,89

5 tp

a

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SSI

NCEE

: I

T IS

AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

I

T IS

IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS

‘AVA

ILAB

LE O

R VI

ABLE

’ CO

MPA

RED

TO

ALR

EAD

Y O

PERA

TIO

NAL

SIT

ES;;

IIT

IS N

OT

NEE

DED

IN

ORD

ER T

O

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EENT.

PA

GE

75

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

SITE

DET

AILS

SI

TE A

PPRA

ISAL

119

FLO

OD

RIS

K AS

SESS

MEN

T SE

QU

ENTI

AL T

EST

OU

TCO

ME

Site

Ref

. an

d Ad

dres

s Ty

pe

Area

(h

a)

Suita

-bi

lity

Avai

la-

bilit

y Vi

a-bi

lity

TOTA

L SC

ORE

Vu

lner

-ab

ility

Fl

ood

Zone

1

Floo

d Zo

ne 2

Fl

ood

Zone

3 FL

OO

D

RISK

Fl

ood

Zone

Ext

ents

Af

fect

ing

the

Site

Re

stm

or

Way

In

dust

rial

Esta

te

SUTT

ON

LSIL

3.

4 30

5

5 40

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

10%

85

%

5%

HIG

H

at ‘h

igh’

floo

d ris

k (3

% in

FZ

3);

exis

ting

capa

city

for

HCI

in S

thLo

ndon

(94

6,34

5 tp

a) a

lread

yex

ceed

s th

e 20

36 a

ppor

tionm

ent

(929

,750

tpa

) by

+16

,595

tpa;

and

exis

ting

C&D

cap

acity

(42

0,27

5)ex

ceed

s fo

reca

st a

risin

gs in

203

6TH

IS A

REA

HAS

TH

EREF

ORE

BEE

N

EXCL

UD

ED F

ROM

DRA

FT S

LWP

SSIN

CEE:

IT I

S AT

‘HIG

H’ F

LOO

D R

ISK;

IT I

S IN

HER

ENTL

Y LE

SS‘A

VAIL

ABLE

OR

VIAB

LE’ C

OM

PARE

D

TO A

LREA

DY

OPE

RATI

ON

AL S

ITES

;;IT

IS

NO

T N

EED

ED I

N O

RDER

TO

MEE

T TH

E 20

36 A

PPO

RTIO

NM

EENT.

Wan

dle

Valle

y Tr

adin

g Es

tate

SU

TTO

N

LSIL

0.

3 26

5

5 36

Le

ss

vuln

erab

le

0%

60%

40

%

HIG

H

area

at

‘hig

h’ fl

ood

risk

(40%

FZ

3);

aris

ing

from

site

app

rais

al (

Tabl

e2.

1), i

t is

con

side

red

unsu

itabl

e/un

avai

labl

e du

e to

red

evel

opm

ent

/allo

catio

n fo

r ot

her

uses

;ex

istin

g ca

paci

ty fo

r H

CI in

Sth

Lond

on (

946,

345

tpa)

alre

ady

exce

eds

the

2036

app

ortio

nmen

t(9

29,7

50 t

pa)

by +

16,5

95tp

a; a

ndex

istin

g C&

D c

apac

ity (

420,

275)

exce

eds

fore

cast

aris

ings

in 2

036

(414

,380

tpa

) by

+5,

895

tpa.

THIS

ARE

A H

AS T

HER

EFO

RE B

EEN

EX

CLU

DED

FRO

M D

RAFT

SLW

P SI

NCEE

:IT

IS

AT ‘H

IGH

’ FLO

OD

RIS

K;M

UCH

OF

THE

ORI

GIN

AL A

REA

HAS

BEE

N R

EDEV

ELO

PED

FO

RO

THER

USE

S AN

D R

EMAI

NIN

GAR

EA F

ORM

S IN

TEG

RAL

PART

OF

THE

WAN

DLE

VAL

LEY

TRAI

L; A

ND

NO

T N

EED

ED T

O M

EET

THE

2036

APPO

RTIO

NM

EEMT

OR

C&D

ARI

SIN

GS

Seq

uent

ial T

est

(Flo

od R

isk)

of

Dra

ft S

outh

Lon

don

Was

te P

lan

PA

GE

76

PAGE 77 Sequential Test on Proposed Waste Management Sites: SLWP Submission Version

South London Waste Plan: SA Report on South London Waste Plan Submission Version (September 2020)

5. Summary and ConclusionsSequential test summary

FLOOD ZONE 1 – LOW RISK (1) SITES AT LOW RISK OF FLUVIAL FLOODING (FLOOD ZONE 1) AND INCLUDED IN THE DRAFT SLWP

5.1 Following the sequential test, the following sites are proposed for inclusion in the SLWP since: they are located wholly in Flood Zone 1 (low risk);they are currently in use for waste purposes which are classified as ‘less vulnerable’ to flood risk;the ‘exceptions test’ would not required for any future planning applications for waste uses onthese sites, incuding proposals site intensification; andthey score highly for suitability, availability and viability as shown in the site appraisal scores.

Site C1: Able Waste Services (Croydon) Site M11: Morden Transfer Station (Merton) Site C4: Days Aggregates (Croydon) Site M12: NJB Recycling (Merton) Site C6: Fishers Farm (Croydon) Site M13: One Waste Clearance (Merton) Site C7: Henry Woods (Croydon) Site M14: Reston (Merton) Site C8: New Era Metals (Croydon) Site M18 Wandle Waste Management (Merton)* Site C9: Pear Tree Farm (Croydon) Site S1: 777 Recycling Centre (Sutton) Site C11: Safety-Kleen (Croydon)* Site S2: Beddington Farmlands ERF(Sutton) Site K2: Genuine Solutions (Kingston) Site S3: Cannon Hygiene (Sutton)* Site K3: Kingston R&R Centre (Kingston) Site S4: Croydon Transfer Station (Sutton) Site K4: Kingston Waste Transfer Station (Kingston) Site S6: Hydro Cleansing (Sutton) Site M1: B&T@Work (Merton) Site S7: Kimpton Park Way Civic Amenity (Sutton) Site M4: Garth Road R&R Centre (Merton), Site S8: King Concrete (Sutton) Site M5: Garth Road Transfer Station (Merton)* Site S9: Premier Skip Hire (Sutton) Site M7: LMD Waste Management (Abbey) (Merton), Site S10: Raven Recycling (Sutton) Site M9: Maguire Skips (Wandle Way) (Merton) Site S11: TGM Environmental (Sutton) Site M10: Powerday (Weir Court) (Merton) Site S12: Country Waste Skip Hire (Sutton)

(2) SITES AT LOW RISK OF FLUVIAL FLOODING (FLOOD ZONE 1) BUT EXCLUDED FROM DRAFT SLWP

5.2 Despite being located within Flood Zone 1, the following sites and broad industrial areas are have been excluded from further consideration because:

they are not needed in order to meet the 2036 apportionmemt or forecast C&S arisings over theplan period;based on the outcome of the site appraisal, they are either (i) unsuitable or unavailable for wasteuses; and/or (ii) they are inherently less ‘available’ or ‘viable’ compared to currently operationalsites (as reflected in the individual site scores);the Intend to Publish London Plan indicates that there is a need for the four boroughs to ensurethat sufficient land is safeguarded for (non-waste) employment uses within industrial locations(particularly within LB Sutton).

Site C2: Croydon Car Spares (Croydon) Purley Way South SIL – Part 1 (Croydon) Site C3: Curley Skip Hire (Croydon)32 Purley Way South(SI) - Part 2 (Croydon) Purley Way North SIL33 - Part 1 (Croydon) Imperial Way SIL (Sutton) Marlpit Lane (Ullswater) LSIL (Croydon) Canbury Park LSIL (Kingston) Thornton Road LSIL (Croydon) Red Lion LSIL (Kingston) Union Road LSIL (Croydon) St George’s LSIL (Kingston)

32 this site is currently closed and located directly djacent to two dwellings 33 this site is currently not contributing to the apportionment and is located adjacent to existing and proposed residential areas

South London Waste Plan: Sequential Test on Proposed Waste Management Sites (September 2020)

Selsdon Road LSIL (Croydon) Silverglade Business Park LSIL (Kingston) Gloucester Road LSIL (East) (Croydon) Dundonald Road LSIL (Merton) Gloucester Road LSIL (West) (Croydon) Gap Road LSIL (Merton) Vulcan Way LSIL (Croydon) Rainbow LSIL (Raynes Park) (Merton) Barwell Business Park SIL (Kingston) Croydon Road LSIL (Sutton) Chessington Industrial Estate SIL (Kingston) Gander Green Lane/ Abbotts Road LSIL (Sutton) Cambridge Road/ Hampden Rd LSIL (Kingston) Plumpton Way Trading Estate LSIL (Sutton)

FLOOD ZONE 2 – MEDIUM RISK (3) SITES AT MEDIUM RISK OF FLOODING (FLOOD ZONE 2) AND INCLUDED IN THE DRAFT SLWP

5.3 Despite being located wholly or partly in Flood Zone 2 (medium risk), the following sites are proposed for inclusion in the SLWP since:

they are currently in use for waste purposes which are classified as ‘less vulnerable’ to flood risk;they already have planning permission and have therefore been appoved on the basis of a sitespecific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA);the ‘exceptions test’ would not required for any future planning applications for waste uses onthese sites, incuding proposals for site intensification; andthey generally score well for suitability, availability and viability by comparison with alternativesites (mostly broad industrial locations) across the plan area as shown in the site appraisal scores.

Site C5B: Factory Lane R&R Centre (Croydon) Site M8: LMD Waste (Willow Lane) (Merton) Site C13: Solo Wood Recycling (Croydon) Site M15 Riverside AD Facility (Merton) Site M2: European Metal Recycling (Merton) Site M16: Riverside Bio-Treatment (Merton) Site M3: Deadman Confidential (Merton) Site M17: UK and European (Ranns) (Merton) Site M6: George Killoughery Ltd (Merton) Site S5: Hinton Skips (Sutton)

(4) SITES AT MEDIUM RISK OF FLOODING (FLOOD ZONE 2) AND EXCLUDED FROM THE DRAFT SLWP

5.4 Following the Sequential Test, the following sites and broad industrial areas are have been excluded from further consideration because:

they are wholly or partly in Flood Zone 2 (medium risk);they are not needed to meet the 2036 apportionmemt or forecast C&S arisings over the plan period;based on the outcome of the site appraisal, they are either (i) unsuitable or unavailable for wasteuses; and/or (ii) they are inherently less ‘available’ or ‘viable’ compared to currently operational sites(as reflected in the individual site scores);the Intend to Publish London Plan indicates that there is a need for the four boroughs to ensure thatsufficient land is safeguarded for (non-waste) employment uses within industrial locations(particularly within LB Sutton).

Purley Way North SIL - Part 2 (Croydon Streatham Road LSIL (Merton) Durnsford Road LSIL?? – (Merton) Nelson Trading Estate LSIL (Merton Beddington SIL (Sutton) Hackbridge LSIL (Sutton) Prince George’s Road LSIL (Merton)

South London Waste Plan: SA Report on South London Waste Plan Submission Version (September 2020)

FLOOD ZONE 3 – HIGH RISK (5) SITES AT HIGH RISK OF FLOODING (FLOOD ZONE 2) BUT INCLUDED IN THE DRAFT SLWP

5.5 Despite being located wholly or partly in Flood Zone 3 (high risk), the following sites are proposed for inclusion in the SLWP since:

they are currently in use for waste purposes which are classified as ‘less vulnerable’ to flood risk;they already have planning permission and have therefore been appoved on the basis of a sitespecific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA);the ‘exceptions test’ would not required for any future planning applications for waste uses onthese sites, incuding proposals for site intensification; andthey generally score well for suitability, availability and viability by comparison with alternativesites (mostly broad industrial locations) across the plan area as shown in the site appraisal scores.

Site C5A: Factory Lane LSIL (Croydon) Site C12: Stubbs Mead Depot (Croydon) Site C10: Purley Oaks LSIL (Croydon)

(6) SITES AT HIGH RISK OF FLOODING (FLOOD ZONE 3) AND EXCLUDED FROM THE DRAFT SLWP

5.6 Following the Sequential Test, the following sites and broad industrial areas are have been excluded from further consideration because:

they are wholly or partly in Flood Zone 3 (high risk);they are not needed to meet the 2036 apportionmemt or forecast C&S arisings over the plan period;based on the outcome of the site appraisal, they are either (i) unsuitable or unavailable for wasteuses; and/or (ii) they are inherently less ‘available’ or ‘viable’ compared to currently operational sites(as reflected in the individual site scores);the Intend to Publish London Plan indicates that there is a need for the four boroughs to ensure thatsufficient land is safeguarded for (non-waste) employment uses within industrial locations(particularly within LB Sutton).

Purley Way North SIL – Part 3 (Croydon) London Road LSIL (Kingston) Durnsford Road SIL (Merton) Sth Wimbledon Bus Park (Morden Rd) LSIL (Merton) Willow Lane SIL (Merton) Plough Lane SIL (Merton) Garth Road LSIL (Merton) Burlington Way (Beverley Way) SIL (Merton) Kimpton SIL (Sutton) Hallowfield Way SIL (Merton) Wandle Valley Trading Estate LSIL (Sutton) Bushey Road LSIL (Merton) Site K1: Chessington Equestrian Centre (Kingston) Burlington Way LSIL – Part 1 Malden Way (Merton) St John’s Industrial Estate LSIL (Kingston) Oldfields Road LSIL (Sutton) Fairfield / Kingsmill LSIL (Kingston) Restmor Way LSIL (Sutton)

Sequential test conclusions 5.7 The London boroughs of Croydon, Kingston, Merton and Sutton have undertaken a sequential test on all potential waste sites and broad industrial locations which have been considered for inclusion in the new South London Waste Plan (SLWP) 2021-36. Accordingly, this document demonstrates how flood risk has been taken into account as part of the wider process of site appraisal and how the four boroughs have sought to apply a ‘sequential, risk-based’ approach to the identification of waste sites in order to avoid flood risk to people and property and manage any residual risk, taking account of climate change.

South London Waste Plan: Sequential Test on Proposed Waste Management Sites (September 2020)

5.8 While the fundamental purpose of the sequential test is to avoid the development of sites that are inappropriate on flood risk grounds by ensuring that sites at little or no risk of flooding are developed in preference to sites at higher risk, there are several unique circumstances relating to the preparation of the new waste plan which have constrained the ability of the sequential test to generate and chose between alternative sites. Most importantly

5.9 Most importantly, the evidence base underlying the preparation of the new plan, including the EA’s waste data interrogator; the Technical Paper (Anthesis, 2019) and updated site throughputs in the Sutton Authority Monitoring Report (AMR) 2018-19, shows that existing capacity for the management of household and commercial & industrial (HCI) waste in South London (946,345 tpa) already exceeds the 2036 apportionment (929,750 tpa) by +16,595tpa in the Intend to Publish London Plan 2019; and existing C&D capacity (420,275) already exceeds forecast arisings in 2036 (414,380 tpa) by +5,895 tpa.

5.10 Since it can be demonstrated that there is no need for additional waste sites or capacity to be identified over the plan period to 2036 over and above existing operational or permitted waste sites, it would be difficult to justify the designation of additional alternative waste sites in the form of broad industrial locations, which mostly consist of SILs and LSILs across the plan area. This is because:

the site appraisal carried as part of the evidence base shows that many of the broad industriallocations (SILs and LSILs) within the plan area are unsuitable and/or unavailable for waste uses(see Table 3.2);the outcome of the site appraisal (see scores in Tables 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3) reflects that fact thatbroad industrial locations are inherently less ‘available’ and viable’ for waste uses by comparisonwith existing waste sites which have planning permission and are already operational;a number of the broad industrial locations are affected by flood risk, with significant areas located within EA Flood Zones 2 or 3;the Intend to Publish London Plan 2019 shows that there is a need to provide sufficient land for(non-waste) employment uses within industrial locations. This is particularly important in LBSutton, where the strategic demand for industrial, logistics and related uses is anticipated to bethe strongest);

for existing waste management operations which are located within areas of higher flood risk and where a planning permission has already been granted, the fact that a site specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) will already have been prepared and approved by the relevant local planning authority which demonstrates that the development is ‘safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere’. While the ‘Exception test’ is not strictly required to be demonstrated for most waste uses (with the exception of hazardous waste or landfilling operations located in Flood Zone 3), an operational site which already has planning permission based upon an approved FRA is favoured over a site which has never previously accommodated a waste use.

Next steps 5.11 The Sequential Test (this document) together with the sustainability appraisal (SA) report, the Equalities Impact Assessment (EqIA) and Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) screening will be considered by the Inspector alongside a range of other evidence base documents when determining the soundness of the SLWP at the Examination in Public (EiP) stage.

zl b croydon zr b kingston zl b merton z south london waste plan · south london capacity (2017...

Documents

london south bank pictures

living in south kensington, london

developing fh services in south west and south east london

london & south east

quantity surveyor – residential - south london

givrybourgogne.free.frgivrybourgogne.free.fr/2013/ap_2013143_0012_derogation...zl...

london south bank university | london south bank...

imprressive cleaners south east london

docs.gre.ac.uk · web viewbirkbeck, university of london;...

south east london gyms

our values - london south bank university | london south

wild south london

south london data centre

projected acute hospital demand in south east london meic...

london and south east pharmacy

skills for south londoners - south london...

hlv 03radnovice.cz/02_hlv.pdf · 2018. 9. 14. · spo 50 zo...

south east london: sustainability and transformation plan...

south west london performance & quality highlight report...

south london rus - network rail