an archaeological survey of goshen valley, utah county

162
Brigham Young University Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1968 An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County, Central An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County, Central Utah Utah Leland Gilsen Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Gilsen, Leland, "An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County, Central Utah" (1968). Theses and Dissertations. 4716. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4716 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected].

Upload: others

Post on 13-May-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

Brigham Young University Brigham Young University

BYU ScholarsArchive BYU ScholarsArchive

Theses and Dissertations

1968

An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County, Central An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County, Central

Utah Utah

Leland Gilsen Brigham Young University - Provo

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd

Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons

BYU ScholarsArchive Citation BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Gilsen, Leland, "An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County, Central Utah" (1968). Theses and Dissertations. 4716. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4716

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected].

Page 2: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

ANXN archaeological SURVEY OF GOSHEN VALLEYvaldey

UTAH COUNTY CENTRAL UTAH

fulfifulci ent

A thesis

presented to the

department of anthropology and archaeology

brigham young university

in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the degree of

master of arts

by

lelandleiandlefand gil611gilsensen

august 1968

V EY

Page 3: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

vilevlie

woaldwould excavate in the cave for three days then

survey two days and thetrie followingf week reverse so that three days were

spenspewspeh surveying and two excavatingexcavatingoexcava intingo this way we gained experience in

both cave excavation and surface site surveyingosurveyingsurvey weingo concentrated on the

currentcu creekrrent cndand kimball creek drainagesdrainagesodraina somegeso work was done in the sand

duriesdunes around the salzsalt ponds and along the eastern slope of the tinticgintic

raneanear we were never able to spend the time needed for a survey of the

dunes around the southernbouthern end of utah lake our visit to this area confined

to the area around 42utl0342utlo3

appreciation is expressed to ross T christensen chairman of the

department of anthropology and archaeology for the use of equipment and

laboratorylaborlabon facilitiesfaatory atlitj-es brigham young universityouniversity

andund

PREFACE

the objectives of this thesis are threefold 1 to survey and

record thetine archaeology cic i sites in goshen valleyvalleygvaileyvalleys 2 evaluate the

materials found during the survey and 3 to discover if there is a

dividing line between the provo sevierserier fremont region as outlined by

ambler 1966 little has been done archaeologically around utah lake

tiietietlevie bast ecological setting for ancient peoples along the wasatch front

and several hypothesis concerning the breakdown of the fremont area into

subdivisions revolve around goshen valleyovallebo green 196480196480o1964800

the survey was conducted during the last half of the summer of

1966 on a part time basisobasisbariso arrangements were made with james mock who

was excavating spotten cave in genola so that the survey could be done on

a operativecooperativeco basisbasisobariso WWs

archaeoloaello gi callyeallyeaily

11wo wing

rance

04

bas is

Page 4: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

winegwifeg pats

special thanks go to ray te matheny for his help and advice and also

his time spent in aerial photography in an experiment to test the value of

this method of site surveying in the utah desert

special thanks go also to jamesjanes mock and my wife pat for the

long hours spent in walking the many miles in the valleyovalleyvaileyvallebo also to earl and

jay woodard residents of goshen who helped in the excavation of the

woodard mount mromramro woodard spent many hours among the residents of the

valley gleaning information on archaeological sites from the residents

and then spent many hours in the field guiding our party to these new sitesositessltesditeso

appreciation is also expressed to those students of the brigham

young university field class of 196661966671966 67 who6 gave up their thanksgiving

holidays to excavate at the woodard moundomoundboundo theyoney are bill jonesjoness bruce

louthan judy conner beverly earl and elaine thurberthurberothurbergThur thanksbero also goes

to bryant and shurman jones of payson for their volunteered time and back

hoe at the woodard mound excavation

acknowledgementknowledgementAc is given to dr jesse do jennings for coming out to

look at ut1o442u110442 and 42ut2342ut273 for his advice and for his kindness for allow-

ing james mock and myself to study the collections of the university of

utah also thanks go to floyd wo sharrock who allowed us to work with the

nephi materials while they were being processed

all specimens recovered during the survey are now stored at the museum

of archaeology and ethnology brigham young university provo utahoutahitaho

LG

august 1967

T

4an

D

whi le

Page 5: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

09 0

00 00 080

11

8

physiography

09

bab0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii

chapter

lo10 introduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

ao theoretical developmedevelopments with regard to thefremont culture 0 0 0 0 0 ol01

bo goshen valley history

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

A valleyvailey location 11

B geology 0 0 0 11

C hydrology 0 0 0 0 12

D climate 0 0 0 0 0 0 14

E flora 0 0 0 0 0 14

fauna 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 16

1110illoiilo procedures 0 0 0 0 0 0 17

A field method 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17

B laboratory method 0 0 0 0 0 0 a0 0 0 0 18

IV descriptions OF SITES 0 0 0 0 20

A types of sites 0 0 0 0 21

bo site descriptions 0 0 0 21

V excavation AT SITE 42uu0442utlo4 WOODARD mounirMOUNDS 0 0 57

VIvl CERAMICS 0 0 0 76

ao sandlingsanylingSany methodsling 0 0 0 0 0 0 76

B types and varieties 0 0 0 0 0 76

co sherd analysis 0 0 87

D reworked sherdsshards 0 91

E pipes 0 93

9 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i1LISTusiusn OF FIGURES

1

A

0 09 9 9

B V ey e 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

V ey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0

do 9 a e 9 e 0 a0 0 0 0

e 0 9 9 e e

6 e e 9 9

e 9 e e e e e 0 e 9 e a

0 9 e 9 e e

0 0 0

As e & 9 e 0 9 e 9

B 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

e 09 e e e 0 0 0 0 0 9 a0 0 0 0

A S & 0 e e & e

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

do e 9 e a 0 a0 e 9

e 9 9 0 9 a 9 0

Developmentsants9.9

Page 6: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aa2a

VII NON CERAMIC SPECIMENSSPECIMNS 94

A chipped stone 94

1 projectile points 942 scrapers 0 1043 knives 107ae4e drills 0 11250 choppers 1156 hammerstonesHammer stones 115

bo smoothed stone 0 117

1 metatesmetakes 0 11720 manos 11930 grooved stone balls 0 0 0 0 0 0 e a0 0 12040 shaft smoothers 0 0 0 0 0 0 122

co worked bone 125

lo10 awlsawlawiskwi 0 0 1252 flaking tools 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1273 beads of bone and shell 0 12740 gaming pieces 130

D unfired claydaymay objects 131

E miscellaneous specimens 136

VIIIvili discussion 140

A settlement pattern 0 0 140

B ceramic indicators 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142

C relationships of goshen valley to the fremontculture 146

bibliography 0 0 148

0 10 1 IV Is 0 0

1 11 1.1 0 16 16 6 6 0 0 0 0 0

0

0 0 0 0

0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Is 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

5 0 0 9 0 1.1 0 0

601 19 0 16 0 0 0 0.0 Is 0 0 0

B 0 0 0 a0 1 a 9 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 6 a 0

2 0 10 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 1 0 Is 1 0 0 0 0

3 0 a 0

4 0 0 0 0

C 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 s 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 9 0 9 9

0 0 a 0 0 0

G ng e e 9 e 9 0 0 0 0

0 9 0 9 a 0 9 e e 9 w 9 e a

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 a

0 0

0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 a

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 7: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

LIST OF FIGURES

figure pegepagepere

1 map of the fremont area 6

2 42utio342utl03 23

3 woodard mound feature 2 61

4 woodard mount feature 171 7 62

5 cache pits of the woodard mound 63

6aaa camparativecomparativeCampara datative on pottery types of the woodard mound 69

6bab same data with ceramics clustered types 70

6cac same data with squares clustered types 71

7 profiles of trenches 72

8 profiles of square 111IIIlii 73

gadgedd pottery frequency and distribution 8386

10 reworked sherdsshards and pipe 92

11 projectile points 95

12 projectile points 97

13 projectile points 0 100

14 distribution of projectile points 103

15 scrapers 105

igo16160ige distribution of scrapers 106

17 knives 108

18 knives and scrapers 110

19 distribution of knives

113

21 distribution of drills 114

22 choppers 116

0

0

70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

80 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 11 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 illIII111liililili20 drills 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

220 0 0 0 0

83 86

Page 8: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

figure page

23 measurement and distribution of discoidal manos 0 119

24 sinkers and shaft smoothers 0 0 0 0 121

25 distribution of traits 0 0 0 0 123

26 bone awls and flamersflakers 0 0 0 0 126

2 beads and gaming pieces 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129

28 figurines 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132

29029 trait distribution of fremontfremon figurines of the provosevier area 0 0 0 0 134

30 miscellaneous specimens 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 137

31 ceramic bearing sites in the valley

144

fi 6

0 9 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9

0 0 0 0 0

a 0 1 0 0 0

t0 0 a a0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0

a e

0 0 a 0 0 0 e 9 8143143.1430143

32 ceramic distribution within the valley by type 0 0

143

Page 9: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

CHAPTER ONE

introduction

theoretical developments WITH REGARD TO THE FREMONT CULTURE

the theoretical concept of the fremont culture has been in a state

of modification since the earliest archaeological explorations indicated

that a prehistoric fanningfarming culture had existed in itahoutahoutah morss 1931 s

one of the first to call the material remains excavated by judd 1919

1926 and the sites discovered during his survey of the sevier riverrivers a

northern peripheral area to the southwestsouthwestoSouth thewesto early excavatorsexcavatorsqexcavatoryexcava suchtors as

judd were misled into believing that the pit houses found in utah were

kivas because the tunnel entrance to the structures looked like kiva

ventilator shafts judd and morss believed that the kiva and the associ-

ated farming complex must have been a growth out of the southwestosouthwestSouth thewesto

evidence at that time did seem overwhelmingooverwhelm

wormington

ingo

1955 fromfrom work at the tumerlookTumerturner sitesitessltesLook cited evidence

for possible northeastern influences in the fremont areaoareaarcao she examined

the evidence that the earliest sites seem to be found in the northeastern

section of the stateostatestareo this was of course inconsistent with the northern

peripheral theoryotheorytheordo also wormington pointed out the plainsstylePlains pletostyle

graphs present in the fremont area appeared to be inconsistent with the

northern peripheral theory

As more sites were excavated the anomaly between southwest and

fremont became more selfseif evidentevidentoevidente the basic material cultures differed

too widely to be accounted for by the northern peripheral theoryotheorytheordo the

OPMENTS

was

ex ned

Page 10: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

basicbaslebasie y

clacia

areadareav

diceadiceq

glen canyon project interrupted work on the main body of fremont sites

until the late 1950 s when gunnerson and taylor did some workowork gunner-

son 1956 suggested a plains promontory relationshiporelationshiprelationshipsrelations engerhipo and blairbiair

1947 advanced this idea when they recognized that skeletal materials

seemed to have been basically of plains briginooriginoorigin armelligosArmel personalligos

communication disagrees with the interpretation on the basis of the

lack of a statistical framework in the small numbers of skeletons but

there does seem to be some evidence that there is a difference between

the southwestern and fremont physical typesotypes

in the middle 1960 aikens 1966 ambler 1966 and sharrockShar

1965

rockroek

did more work in the fremont area their work indicated that

there were just too many weaknesses in the northern peripheral theory

for it to be upheldupheldc

mulloyslloysmullousMu work 1958222 along with that suggested by burgh and

scoggin 194889 indicated an early date for an intrusion of plains

traits into utah the earliest sites seemed to be in the caveseaves of the

northeastonortheastnort forheasto many years it was believed that the promontory culture

indicated a strong plains influx into the fremont area but at a late

datedateebatee steward 1937 listed many of the traits that were strongly

northern in origin these included a distinctive moccasin mittensmittenssmittenessmitt

sinew

ensienss

backed bow dicedlce end scraper of particular form paddle and

anvil pottery serrated bison bone metapoidal fleshersfreshersfle gunnersonshers 1956

indicated an association between the promontory and dismal river cultures

with promontory as a late plains thrust dismal river parentage

energingbnergingemergingEner evidenceging indicates thtth4tthat the promontory is earlier than

the dismal river culture aikens 1966a as a c14 date has been made of

a fremont moccasin of AD 1100751100 yearsyearse75 also there have been several

2

1950s

1960s 19669

Page 11: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

sites in which promontory and fremont materials have been found to be

contemporaneous steward 1937 smith 1941 jameson 1958 aikens

1966a 1966c

indications are that the fremont is of northern plains origin

due to the fact that both areas share the following traits north-

western plains style pictographspictography recently discovered house forms pro-

jectile point forms bone and antler artifacts moccasins bison hunting

surface manipulated pottery the absence of kivas sandals cotton

turkeys grooved axes and peculiar pottery forms common in the south-

west also tend to negate southern influences traits such as stone

alignments like tipi rings taylor 1957 aikens 1966a 1966b sharrock

1966 hide shields and a boundary between fremont and southwestern

area euler 1964 aikens 1965 1966c are also plains like

recent evidence that the promontory culture was contemporary with

the fremont and is admittedly plains in origin and nature seems to su-bstantiate the plains origin for the fremont the promontory culture

shares with the fremont the following traits surface manipulated

ceramics stone pipes floor carved pot rests hidden ball game cane

dice and inscribed stone slabs the latter have recently been found

in direct association with fremont pottery in spotten cave mock per-

sonal communication

the proto fremont peoples aiken 1967204 were probably a group

of bison hunters with most of the above named characteristics who moved

into the utah area around 600 AD they seemed to have adopted traitsfrom an early anasazi culture probably along the virgin river drain-

age or from basket maker indigenesindi aikensgenes 1967204 these people

3

c on

co ubicationunicationunicationcatlon

Page 12: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

stonegsatoneg

4

adapted quickly to a modified corn horticulture architecture and cerwaicscerooicsoceroo

the

icso

combined traits were synthesized into a mixed hunting hortihorticultureulturealtureeconomy with a continued emphasis on the old nomadic life way there are

some indications that the tipi rings continued totc be built in the extreme

north sharrock 196610911 and possibly remained as ceremonial structures

called stone allignmentsoalligrments these are found encnc highn localities near

house clustersoclustersclust theyerso have been reported from the old woman site taylor

1957 9 cisco wormingtonWona 195ington torrey morss 1931193 uinta basirbasin

gunnerson 19 529579 sharro3ksharrock 1966a garrison taylor 1954929549 tavaputsTava

plateau

puts

gunnerson 1957 bridger basin day and dibble 19639 fremont

river woodard personal communication and in goshen valley 42ut325e42ut325

the pro to fremont peoples adopted the concept of coil made and

surface painting of ceramics from the anasazioanasazianasarioAna vethesazio people synthesized

the pottery complex into a tradition of painted andor surface manipulated

typesotypes also they adopted the concept of making figurines from the

anasazi and elaborated them to the point where they became one of the

more spectacular traits of the fremont maemal

many structural forms are found in the fremont area and the timetimatinetinb

or areal distributions of these forms is still in doubt sharrock per-

sonal communicomminicationscanions o0 in generalgene storageralgraig structures are cfofc thef fc1lowingfellowingbellowingfeifel

typestypess

lowing

1 unlined cadlecadiecache pits found in most open sites bell shaped

capped with stone or clay 2 stone lined cadhecache pits found usually

in rock shelters stoneslabstone linedslab rectangular or square in single or

multibinmult unitsibin 3 coursed adobe surface units floors and walls of

clay mud and pole roofs stone roof coversnavers for entrantentrancesentranc 4 masonry

units coursed motarlessmotorlessmot stonearless built on rock floors mud and pole roofroofs59

stone side or roof entrance coverscover so

1

1957

1957t 1963 FY emont

mae iallallai ulturealtureul ture

communications

units9

proto

ma e

entranc ss

morsswonn

maemae

Page 13: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

5

type 4 granaries are usually found in the southwestern and

midwesternmid siteswestern in sheltered areas type 3 granaries are more cha-racteristic of the sevier and provo regions and open sites this type

of granary was called the kanosh house by steward 1933 but is now

recognized as a granary

dwellings are also varied and are of the following general

typestypess 1 coursed adobe walls coiled surface or shallow pit floors

rectangular to circular average fifteen feet to a side some prepared

floors central firelitfirepit that is usually circular and clay lined roof

of mud and poles four support posts around the firelitfirepitfire andpit roof en-

trance 2 adobe brick built on surface similar in all other

respects to type 1 3 jacal surface and shallow pit foundations

pole and mud roof 12 to 25 feet to a side central firepitfirelit stone or

clay lined 4 surface earthlodgeearth ovallodge average 13 feet in diameter

central clay lined firelitfirepitfire probablypit conical with truncated roof roof

or high side entrance 5 masonry surface structure mud and pole

roof central stone lined firepitfirelitfire 6pit pit earthlodgeearth rectangularlodge to

round up to 30 feet in diameter 6 to 12 inch pits central firepilfirepiusually clay lined four support posts around the firelitfirepitfire somepit tunnel

entrances some roof entrances probably truncated pyramid in shapeoshadeo

type I11 structures are found at nephi beaver marysvalemrysvaleMarysmaeys ephraimvalevaie

tooelethoele old woman and nile mile canyonocanyoncantono type 2 is found in nine mile

canyoncanyouo type 3 is found at nephi garrison marysvaleMarys ephraimvale and

old woman sites type 4 is found at nephinephiabephia willard and beaver type 5

is found at nine mile canyon poplar knob caldwell turner look fremont

river and escalante sites type 6 is found at nephi beaver Paragonaparagonahpparagonah

marysvalenhrysvaleMarys ephraimvalevaie tooelethoele old woman and nine mile canyon sitesoditeso

acteristic

hpParagonah

Page 14: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

fig I1 mopmap showing the location of the fremont oreoareaorea the major oreolareolareal subdivisions

some of the more important fremont sites

Page 15: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

asaziabazi

sharrock personalners communicationonalonai stated that selected contrac-

tion and method and materials seem to be a function of available mate-

rials and olace of construction rather than locally culturally conditioned

nreferencesreferencespreferences I1 disagree however as archaeological data almost invari-

ably demonstrates that structural designs are as culturally determined

as are ceramic types point types and other learned processes

it would appear that by around AD 900 the mixture of plains

and southwestern traits were solidified into the fremont culture with

rich traditions and a tenacious ability to hold onto the inhospitable

land there was an established border between the anasazi and the

fremont peoples euler 196480 aikens 19657 over which trade goods

were exchanged it would appear that about this time regional differ-

ences also began to appear with plains traits being predominant in the

north and anasazi in the south

fremont rock art indicates that there was some emphasis on wa-

rfare and the sophisticated weaponry supports this viewpoint it has

been suggested that the fremont practicedoracticed head hunting and possibly

cannibalism wormington 1955

the size of structures and their general clustering into small

groups indicate that villages were rare in most cases the people

seemed to have been in an extended family situation which exploited

the local area for its animal resources while practicing horticulture

they would visit the samebame areas around springs and rivers over and over

which had a tendency to build up stratigraphic sequences in some areas

meighan 1956 stated that paragonahPara appearedgonah to be occupied continuous-

ly for about 200 years by a group of around 150 to 200 people there

are indications that nephi and a few other sites were of approximately

equal size and lasted a comparable time

7

contruc

an

ders

Page 16: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

casesicasesq

utahsutahq

8

the smallsnallsnail size of structures indicates that they were not lived

in so much as they were the home base for the family0 there are use

areas associated with structures sharrock personal communication

where most of the everyday living went on also associated with the

use areas are firepitsrepitsfi and cache pitsopitspottery seems to have been locally made in most caseseases but there

are indications from the goshen survey that some of the more elaborate

painted varieties were made at the longtermlong sitesterm see chapter vo

villages may have developed that traded with the more mobile groups and

may have been the stabilizing factor in fremont ceranicceramicsoceramicsceramicby around 1250 ambler 1966 to 1600 aikens 1967205 the

fremont began to move out of utah possibly because of shoshonianshoshoneanShosho

movements

nian

into the basin lamb 1958e the fremont peoples may have

become the stimulus to the dismal river culture of nebraskaNebrask kansas

colorado and wyomingomingvoyItyvoo aikens 1966o196601966

GOSHEN VALLEY HISTORY

in 1775 escalantesescalantecalantesEs party passed along utah valley and down

through goshen valleyvailey and current creekcreeke some exerptsexempts from hishig diary

translated by bancroft 1964 are as followfollowssfollows

except for the marshes on the lake borders the landis good for agricultureoagriculturooagriculturer of the four rivers whichwater the valley the southernmostsouthern gmosts which they callaguas callientessCallien passestess through ridlridirichrial meadows capable of supporting two large townsotowns besides theserivers are good springs of water on both plain andmountainside pasture lands are abundant and inparts the fertie soil yields such quanitiesquantitiesquani ofties flaxand hemp that it seems they must have been plantedthere by manomannanonan on the san buenaventura the spaniardshad been troubled by the cold but here the climateis so delightfuldelight 9 the air so bainybalmyy that it is apleasure to breathe it by day and by nightnightefighte inthe vicinity are other valleys equally delightful

sm

f ly

V

1960to

1958

s

V ey

C lentes

so

ss

aq

fulg

Page 17: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

I1steele 1960o196001960

weswas

azwz uld scarescara thezhe settlers into giving them food when they caught them

aloneoa1oneabone theychey used the west side of the lake to move in a north south

direction as it was much faster than going around west mountain and

across the riversoeversoe theverso last engagement of the walker war was fought

on thethigthle southern shore of utah lake and is known as the goshen valleyvailey

battle steele 1960o19600 in 1856 a group of utes under tinticgintic moved out

of cedar valleyvailey and stele some cattlecattie and six people were killed in

the resulting skirmishes steele 1960o19600

in 184 phineas cook and a small group decided to settle the area

south of utah& lake and obtained permission from president brigham

ycungycungoyoungo they found large natural meadows of bunch grass bluestem

grassgrassy and curley grass on the higher areas and broadleafbroad grassleaf narrow

leaflear grass and wire grass in the lowlandslovlandsolovland they established a settle

nent and dammed up current creek then little salt creek for irrigatlono

sagebrush in the valleyvailey was then very rareorarecareo the original settlement

was fort sodom steele 1960

cattlegcattler

irrigatirrigatelonion

besides theuhe products ofI1

thehareharelhanalhanat

lakerdcind

thegather

utasseeds

huntfrom which they make

stoiestole 0 they might capture some buffalo inthe northnortnorl northh west but for the troublesomecomanchesoComanconan heytheycheso dwell in huts of osierosler ofwhich likewise many of their utensils aremade some of them wear clothescloth theesq best ofwhich are of the skins of rabbits and antelopeoantelopeantelopesanteloantelanteianteio

aheihe indians

opeo

voaidwould steals- eal cattle wheneveruh availableenever and they

woulawould

about two miles north of the present

town of goshen on the east side of the creedocreekocreek it was two acres square

with double maliswallsmails of juniper posts filled with sodosod

methe lowland meadows were so rich for cattle that until the

winter of 1879189187 80 the attieattle grazed the lake bottoms on their own

during the winterswintersowintersonwin butbatterseterso over 3000 head diedclied during the 1879189187 winter

and now the residents mow the natural grasses for emergency situations

9

0 make

TC aanch e s osierowhi&j

t e se ers

0 1 V ey

eo 6 19L 60stV ey

1960

1847

04 brigh

V ey

1960s

w s

A

so

pG

stogle

eai

ula

leaf

ecung

Page 18: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

10

some people say the valley gets its name from its resemblance

to the land of goshengoshen11 given to jacob by pharaoh in genesis 46114761146476

but

11

others less romanticromanronan declaretieg that it was named after phineas

cooks home town of goshen massachusetts steele 1960o19600

in 18589 johnstonsJohn armystonOs camped in cedar valley just over a

low range of hills and traded with the people of goshenogoshen trade stim

alatedulated settlement and in 1859 the people moved to a new town called

sandtownSand onetown mile to the southwest of goshen to get out of the swampswamps so

but the drifting sand drove themhemthen to the townsite of lower goshen

several miles northwestenorthwests and mechanicsvilleMechanics establishedville only 300 yards

southwest of the old fortofort in l860y a ditch was dug from the dam to

the meadows near lower goshen which is now called job creekocreekcreedo finally

the people slowly moved to the present site of goshen steele 1960

1960

goshen

es

1860

11

hen

Page 19: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

lalkalkai

levellevei

and 795507550255029550 feet above the valley floor currentcarrent creek originates on

mount nebo where the snows provide perennial waterowaterbatero on the south

goshen valley is narrowed by the junction of long ridge with the east

untie range 0 the tinticgintic mountains also border the west side of the

valleyvailey and along the northwest borderborders 9 the lake mountains complete

the chain all ranges are of the typical northsouthnorth tendingsouth basin and

range varietyovarietyvarieverieverle highwaytyo 6 passes through the valley in an east west

direction from the pass at santaquinSan totaquin the pass through the tinticgintic

mountainsomountainsmountainshmounta highwayinso 68 goes down the west side of utah lake and joins

highway 6 at elbertaoelbertabertaoEl

GEOLOGY

most of the valley consists of broad alluvial fans and gravel

beds deposited by lake bonnevilleobonneville the surrounding ranges have a

short history compared to the wasatch front immediately to the eastoeastmount nebo is basically an oquirrah formation upthrust over gray and

red shales of jurrasicJur ageoagerasic the total vertical displacement along

the wasatch front amounts to many thousands of feetofeetfeato long ridge

11

CHAPTER TWO

physiography

goshen valley is located in central utah at the south end of

utah lakeolakejakeo the valley is surrounded by mountains and drains directly

into utah lake on the east is west mountain and long ridge with

a pass between them located at santaquinosantaquinSan totaquinotaquin the east of long ridge

is mount nebo s a snow covered peak over 12000129000 feet above sea leveigleveigh

d

v ey

to l&l

Page 20: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

12

seems to be a late thrust of cretaceous and tertiary formations covered

with a cap of volcanic rocks of tertiary ageageo the east gintictintic range

is of a comparable ageageo the tintle mountains were a major source of

minerals used by the indians in the manufacture of stone toolsotoolstoolson

HYMOLOGYHTCROLOGY

the dominant feature of goshen valley is utah lakelakeojakeo the lake

is a freshwaterfresh bodywater which freezes over almost every winter it isabout 22 miles long and 10 miles wide and covers about 959000 acresacresoaeresacress

the lake averages only about eight feet in depthodepthdepths due to its large

surface area the level fluctuates during long dry or wet spells

wakefield 1933o19330

the water sources for the lake are streams seepagesseepagesqsee9 springspages

in or near the lake and precipitationpreeipitationo most of the water comes from

the provo rlverfdveradver and other streamstreams but there are huge springs feeding

the lake along the shore lineslinesoiineslinero the lake drains about 3600 square

miles atlallatt of the active sources from the wasatch frontopronto the provo

river source is in the uinta mountains seventy five miles east of

utah lake and drains an area of about 600 square milesomilesnilesmileno spanish fork

river is the next largest water source with almost as great a drainageodrainagedrainagesdrain

there

ageo

are ten streams feeding the lake and only one the jordan

flowing from it wakefield 1933 0

goshen canyoncanyons in the southeastsouth cutseasts through long ridge for

one and one half milenomilesomilesniles it has a general

do ant goshen

ost

es es

1933 0

northwest southeast trendotrend

dethe canyon has steep walls no more than 200 feet high and current

creek flows through it from juab valleyvailey and mount nebo peterson 1953 0V ey

ss

Page 21: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

deedsneeds

centacentq

13

the main northeastnorthestnortheast trendingnorthestnorthwest goshen valley ends in

th southbouth kimball creek canyoncanyorecenyoncalyoreCan kimballyoroyoreyone creek is dry in the valley

except during heavy melt or rains9rainsqrainsb but at higher elevations there isa4 constant flow about one foot wide and several inches deepdeepoceepo itwould appear that this is sufficient for horticultural or camping

nteds9 as there are aboriginal house clusters and campsites along the

rekersekthetle warnwarmwam springs are located on the west escarpment of long

ridge 0 two miles east of the town of goshenogoshen the springs are thermal

keeping a constant year round temperature of 71 fo the springs are

located along a mile long fault and average 6 second feet with a low

headoheadbeado the output of the springs dropped only 25 per cent after a two

year drought in 1935 d have never been known to dry up peterson

1953o19530

in the center of the valleyvailey are a group of salt ponds which

freeze avereverover in the kinterowinterowinter they are fed from an unknown source and

are on Ifferentterent eleatioielevatiarxs

the

710 F

621

and

1953

v ey

most unexpectedmnexpen placested but these generally dry up in the summer these

are madmud flats covered with growths of reed and bullrushobullrushbullbuilbuli thererusho are

two cfof these vegetation colonies near the salt ponds

d-ifferent ase ditches dug from the highest to the low-

es producedproda ad rapid flow but in no way altered the level of the

pondsepondsfondse they averagearage about 30 feet in diameter and about 30 feet in

mearyngange abieablearabieavablearable depth wbodardwoodardqwoodardd personal communication the water isslightlyriigmlysligbtly saline but of very lowlw concentration and supports an amazingamassing

variety of simple forms of lifeolifeilfedifeo

theretheris are a few springs seatterscattered throughout the valley in the

mos

ed

est

asek

Page 22: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

14

CLIMATE

the overall climate of goshen valley is semiaridsenisemisent aridgakridg thearidarld annual

precipitation being only 13.0130 inches the west side of utah lake has

a little higher precipitation in summer as storms tend to form over

the untie mountains and move across the valley theche wet months are

march aprilaprilpaprile and may while the dry months are june july august

and september the valley averages four stormy days a month in

summer and ten stormy days a month in spring there is a yearly

average of sixty two stormy days wakefield 1933o19330

the mean annual temperature of the valleyveiley is 4 5 F with 125

frost

1933

v ey

ji

1933

free days in the valley and 150 on the higher benches wak-

efield 1933o193301933

the summer months are characterized by high temperatures low

rainfall and high evaporation because of these conditions the soil

moisture used by most plants comes from precipitation occurring during

the first five months of the yearoyearbearo

FLORA

plants observed in the valley during the survey varied with

altitude and soil conditions around the extensive swamps and bogs

of utah lake were abundant reeds bullrushesbullrushesqbullrushbullbuil andrushes cat tails scrildusscripusscripps

validusvalibus vahlyahlvahisahl is the most common bullrush in the valleyvailey

in the area around goshen bay are about 10000 acres of alkali

land which supports only extreme salt grasses h&lophyteshalophzies and sage

artemisia dentatatridentatatridentatetri on the dune areas farther out in the valley

the main vegetation is sagessage rabbitbrushrabbit chrysothamnusbrush nauseosus

greasewood sacolatusSaco vermiculatustvermiculatusqlatus and juniper juniperus utahensis

wakefield 1933e

esq

130

4750

leid

475047.50

Page 23: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

yiaylasalix spo

quercus gamboleigam

1husrhusihusibusahusbolei

melameianoca a

trilobatatrilobitacirsium spo

zea mays

phaseolusPhap spospeoluscucurbita sposp

peach seed intrusiveapricot seed intrusiveplum seed intrusivecockleburpinon pinechoke cherryhackberrysage brushgreasewoodjuniperpoplarrushtumbling mustardsunflowerelderberrynine bark

alffdiffcliff rosewillowoak

skunk brush

thistlecornbeansquash

15

the flora recovered from 42uu04942u1104 the cave site excavated by

james mock was identified by glenn moore of the BYU botany depart

ment and are as follows

level 111IIIlillii this is a temporary label as this is the third

level from the surface and consists of fremont materialsomateri

prunus

also

persicaprunus anneniacaarmeniacaarmentanneniarmeni

krcarckrearctium

aca

ti urmurnumm sppinusfinnspinns edulisadulisprunus melanocarpamelanocamelanomelanoma

celtis reticulatareticulateretiartemesia

culatatridentatatridentatetri

sacobatussarcobatusSacodentata

vermiculatusbatusjuniperus utahensispopulus angustephoriaphragmites spo

brassica spo

heliathushelianthusHeli annusathussanbucussambucusSan glanousalanousalandusbucus A

phisocaphi so carpus spo

coweniacodenia stansburyiastansburstansbustansby a

sp

sp

carpa

trilobata

Page 24: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

fishlfishy

canaeanadensi s

deerdoerblack tailed jackrabbitJackcottontail

rabbitrabbit

porcupinerock squirrelcommon raven

rock wren

mourningmounting dove

gamberscambersGam quailbelsbeistealduckdackduek

american cootcanadian goose

there were many more smallersnailer forms of animal life such as

fish snakes lizards miscellaneous9 birds and smallsmail mammals but

the animals mentioned seem the likeliest food animals and the animal

bones recovered appear to have been of these speciesspeciesospeciosospecspee bisonlesoieso was

recovered along with what mightnight be mountain sheep from the fremont

levellavellevei of the cavecavooeavecadoo A complete list will be published in the spotten

caveCAVO reportoreport

birds9birdsa

16

fauna no animal bones have been identified from goshen valley as the

material from the cave is so great that it has swamped the zoologistsozoologistszoologistnumerous animals were observed in the area during the survey and a

partial list follows

odocileusodocoileus spo

lepus californiouscaliforsylilagusSylila

niousspospgus

erethizonD

diosatumdiosasitellustellusvitellusSi

tum

spo

corvus obsoletusobsoletessalpintusSal obsoletusobsoletespintuszenaidura macroursmacrourusmacro

lophortyxurs

gambeliigambelligamb

anaselii

spespo

aythyavthyaathya spo

fulica americanabranta canadensiscanadensi

goshen

sp

L

sp

sp

sp

sm er

sm

so

Page 25: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aenmen

frequentfrequeney

c ing groundgroundogroundy

in the dunes around the salt ponds and lake the ridge and slope

of the dunes were walked in search of sltessitesositesditeso

once a site was located we placed it on the map by narrowing the

area down to 11 of a sectionosectionsectionssect alliono through the survey a careful tab-

ulation was made of surface features so that the group knew where it was

at any moment of timetimcedimce the site was then measuredmeasureneasure usuallyusudv byy pacing

given a site number and a description made of the site features as well

w ed

frequene

2717272.7

CHAPTER THREE

procedures

FIELD

the first area to be explored contained those sites found by

carl hugh jones 1961 and jay woodard personal communicationecommunicationcommunications the

explorations were confined to the sides of the current creek drainagedrain

so

ageg

it was decided that the survey should start at the utah juab county

line and work down streamstreamo the explorations of dunes on both sides of

the creekcreck were done at intervals of 25 to 50 feet between each person

hen&en any stone flakes were discovered a cry would be given indicating

the nature of the material and through the numbers of calls the frocefrocpbencyiency

of calls the surveyorssurve usuallyyers determined the areal distribution of the

site fairly quicklyoquicklyquick atlyoiyo times a single find would keep the group in the

area of a drainage for several hours before someone would discover where

it came from and locate the siteositepiteo special attention was paid to flatareas between the dunes and creek and the top of dunes which seemed to

have been a favorite camping

Page 26: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

algalsais a sample was obtained

by going to various parts of the site and picking up all cultural mat

erialodrialo

six sites were already known and numbered in goshen valley and 68

more were added to that number by the survey for a total of 4 sites

the numbers used were 42ut2242ut272 through 42u13384zut338 and 42jb3o42jb73

laboratory

once the artifacts were brought in from the field they were washed

and dried they were then numbered with the site number and placed in

divided storage drawers until an analysis could be madeomadenadeonade all debatagedeba

was

tage

placed in general categories countedcount andedg thrown awayavayo all worked

material was classified and a museum catalogue card made out for each

group of artifacts such as knives or projectile points from each sitesiteopiteo

classes of artifacts were devised on the basis of the artifactconfigurations and not on any preconceived system an attempt was made

to keep the system as simple as possible so that each class would not

appear too ambiguous or too complex this also seemed to make more

statistical sense as the numbers involved in each class were increased

to the point where they approximated a statistical sample 0 I1 found the

systems that berge used on his projectile points just too cumbersome to

handle berge 1964

18

as a sketch mapomapnap all materials were placed in paper bags with the sitenumber on theniothemchenio where there was too much materialmateri

pottery was handled in a new way which will be discussed under

ceramics the old pottery classifications were so confused that the

material no longer seemed to fitofitcito the amount of information about the

fremont culture has more than doubled in the last two years

erial

goshen

74

Page 27: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

19

all sites were recorded on university of utah standard site survey

forms and are on file with the department of anthropology there and at

brigham young university

Page 28: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

huntehuniehumie n t1

brudfredrred

ocatoctadcocat 1

oltoui

lnalne

leskleek uieule

sitessltes 42ut2742u1273

is octcd i tc a large flat area where subsurfacesub irrigationsurface isprcticket tod ayo070 the itessitess on the lower end of the creek where the

sand dunsdens rc ijnerlonerlorerajner13r produceger a valleylikevalley effectlike are scattered over

the higherhift frudkribillkribtllfrkliirib

lerier

te creek

ud

l sites are found in these areas where springs

foadfo&d thqi creek searyearfear rundorando the larger sites are located next to springs

or next to flt easreasr rjdhereliereoher sub surface waters could have aided horticul-

ture techniques all of the sites are high on the side of the creek

wellweil OLI rf tr readipeaelpegel of floodsefloods

cledclde

unioaniu

lindaind

20

CHAPTER FOURPOUR

description OF SITES

e i in thethee dunesduardunr ares scattered throughout the valley in

bhethe arjoarj9ar5q arunaar theuniu salt ponds wintering birds probably attracted many

huntenhmitershunterheiters c the ateraler is a natural feeding ground and the dunes offer a

natljc iindllinjllina rhethe dunes are also fed in this area by the warm springsprings 3

drainagedrainagpedrain thepheage dimesdariesdarjesearies along the wannwab springsn area probably were a rich

drdnage and2nd 3 around dune areas in the valley praporprjpor

taina currentcurrertcu creek sites are located in the dunes on either side

of the ci eko tlethejle camp sites are usually located in the high dunesdune

oveilcirioveil ncIri tie creekI eekesk or even on the slope away from the water on thejie

othrmothr0 lendsbendsthe anetner houseI1 clusterscluciu arestenosterostens along the edge of the creek but high

enough

crek A c z

r

9

As 7

loday

dun s c

fe c A

ff

water

Dnneine

rea-h

nat- al 1

A r1ae 1oficalepical sites in goshen valley are located in three mainmailmall

uietheulearecareg current3 creek1 drainageaionalor 2 along the upper

kimtal2 crek drcdlnag pr por

rpnt

r 1 und

p

tle

roach outoat of the reach of floods thenieoheoieole largest site

erek

coday

pne

raae

and

alt

ard

Page 29: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

21

source of wild life during the winters but no trace of sites can be

found today the whole area has been leveled graded and rebuiltorebuilt italso has been used as a cattle grazing area and is torn by their hooves

the dunes along highway 68 appear to have been natural camping

grounds for indian groups moving along the west side of the lake the

pioneer countsaccountsao report that the utes used the west side of the lake as

their main northsouthnorth routesouth

the southern part of the valleyvailey was surveyed to a much greater

extentex thantent tl a3 north because of the drainage potentialsopotentialspotenti currentalsoaiso and

kimball creek offered the best circumstances for settlement so the main

phasisemphasisen of the survey was in this area in the area of dunes around

the lake sites have been reported in mass by the local residents andaridarld a

quick ride by tote gteagteG indicatedyte the correctness of these observations

there was just no time to investigate this area in any detail as winter

snows altered our plans

the following is a brief listing and description of the sites in

goshen valleyvailey i

VILLAGE SITES

lower current creek upper current creek

42utlo242u1102 42ut2342ut273

42ut33842u1338

HOUSE CLUSTERS

lower current creek upper current creek

42ut293 42ut2542ut275

42u12974 42ut27942ut29ut297

42ut29942u1299 42ut282

42ut3oo42u1300 42ut28642u1286

42ut301 kimball creek

v ey

goshen

lakes

Page 30: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

22

42ut3o742u1307

42ut3o942ut309

42ut32542u1325

y2ut3j6

42ut3242ut327

genolagenota

42ut328

reservoir 42ut333

42utl0442ut1o4 elberta

42ut3o642ut306

project

CAMPSITECAMPSITES

42ut103a42utl03a

lowerlover uppercurrent currentcreek cheekcreek

42ut29242u1292 42ut27442ut24

42ut29442u1294 42ut27642ut26

42ut29542u1295 42ut27742ut27

42ut296 42ut28042u1280

42ut298 42ut28l42ut281

42ut30842u1308 42ut283

salt 42ut284ponds

42ut28542ut302

42ut28842ut3o342ut303

42ut28942u128942ut3o442ut304

42ut29042ut334

42ut29142ut335

42ut3l342ut313kimball

42ut31442ut3l442ut32042u1320

creek

42ut31542ut321

42ut31642ut3l642ut322

42ut33742ut32342u1323

elberta4201324 project

42ut326 42utl03bcd

42ut329 42ut31o42u1310

ae utjj6

ceno a

42ut1oab3b 9 c 9 d

C eno

St

geno

Page 31: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

romanroahro mw03

ronrow BERGE 1

figureFIGURS Z2

2

sm 10 senSEC 3

isoo1500

FENCEfendefehde

x AREA

ARE

4sooasoo

SEC

408

Page 32: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

24

CAMPSITES contconto

42ut330 42ut31142ut3ll

42ut331 42ut31242ct312

42ut332 42ut3142ut3l7

dune distance between 42813192

goshen and warm springs

42ut30542ut3o5

42utlo242utl02 rwrafrwf of SW of seco2sec2secof t10s rlwelw house cluster

thisohis site is about one mile northwest of the town of goshen on

the bend roadroade it is on the east side of the road and in the field

across from the whitewitemite farm it was excavated to an extent and is reported

in chapter fivefiveoyivefileo

42utl0342u siwS of SW of seco2sec2seca tst4s RLW campsite and house austerclusterduster

this site is on the elberta project farm and is about one half

mile long and consists of multiple occupationsoceupationso it is on a low bench

along an old shore line near the sourhwesternsouthwestern end is a spring which

fluctuates with the lake levelslevelsoleveisleverso oiesietheole bench is covered with shifting

sands due to the nature of the local dunesodunesdoneso dethe northeastern end has

been leveled and placed under cultivationocultivationcultivations

I1 have divided the site up into four areas see figure 2 some-

what equivalent to those assigned by jones 1961o196119610 area A is a house

cluster next to the spring area B is a group of campsites that have

been partially destroyed by the road area C is another group of

possible houses but in a very eroded condition area D is perhaps

twentyfivetwenty smallfive campsites that are scattered in the dunesodunesdoneso all of

these sites have been lumped together because they overlap also allaliailareas have some fremont pottery in association with campfirescamp reaareafiresD does seem to b predominantly non fremont

4

S

be

swe seca

Page 33: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

25

CULTURAL MATERIAL area A

29 provo gray4 salt lake gray

14 sevier gray1 scraper fragment4 hammerstoneshammer2

stonesmano fragments

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

debatageDeba65tage

agate34 quartzite81 chert69 jasper

3 obsidian

CULTURAL MATERIAL area B

2 prowproveprovo gray1 sevier gray2 scraper fragments

debatageDeba57tage

agate5 quartzite

38 chertehert34 jasper1 andesite

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

CULTURAL MATERIAL area Cs

15 provo gray8 salt lake gray2 sevier gray1 hammerstone1 flat mono discoidal1 tubular shell bead

CULTURAL affiliationsaffiliation fremont

dabatagedebatageDabaDeba36tage

agate8 quartzite

16 chert21 jasper1 obsidian

CULTURAL MATERIAL area Ds

4 provoprove gray1 shoshonishoshoneSho sherdshoni

10 projectile pointsI11 type H

1 type L1 type N

7 fragments1 type B knife3 drills

1 type A

2 type B

debatageDeba79tage

agate34 quartzite54 chert45 jasper

2 obsidian

6 scraper fragments2 hammerstoneshammer

CULTURAL

stones

affiliation unknownUnknow possibly late ute

bt

chert

CUL AL

C

D

ng

Page 34: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

awknwk

26

42utio442utl04 SEsek of NW of sec 4 t9sts rlwelw cave site

this site is just south of highway 6 where it passes over long

ridge from santaquinSan thetaquin site is southwest of the reservoir and in a

rocky outcrop of the ridge the cave opens to the southwest and is

thirty feet deep it is more of a rock shelter than a cave as it is

almost as wide as deep the cave was excavated over the period of

1964 to 1967 it contained seven feet of fill in the front and five

in the rear after excavation it was thirty six feet long twenty one

feet wide and seventeen feet deep there were five main stratigraphic

sequences in the cave of which the fremont wasvaswad the largest the strata

were from top to bottom temporary labels level 1 white contact

period level 11 late hunters and gatherers level 111 fremont

level IV and V desert culture the bottom of level I11 was sealed off

from the rest of the cave by a layer of sheep dung ranging from 4 to 12

inches in depth this material was so consolidated as to be very much

like cement rodent action in the cave after this time seems to have

been confined to the sides of chethe cave where the dung did not extend

each level had many living floors as evidenced by compacted soils and

an abundance of artifacts all levels had fire lenses and C 14 samples

were taken from almost all of them but are not available for evaluation

at the present time the fremont level contained corn beans and squash

it also contained a sleeping platform mud wall across the entrance of

the cave and an angostura point that was obviously out of context

promontory inscribed slabs were found in all levels but were obviously

from the fremont level they were not in association with the typical

promontory assemblegeassemblageassemble andge this seems to bear out the hypothesis that

fremont and promontory were contemporaneous

Page 35: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

klelle 5wyq

nekneb

jawdaw

awkswk awkswk

27

great salt lake gray 178 60.076007snake valley gray 64 21.612161knolls gray 38 12.821282sevier gray 16 5.49549

296 99.999999

42ut 153 sec 36 TIOS RIW

mile northwest of the flume it is of two men

both in ceremonial costume and is done in red paint this site was

also reported by reagan 1935

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut272 NE of SE of sease6 26 tiost10sbios RIW

uk

k

pictograph jamA rour4urodrau aoqo

this site is located in upper current creek canyon near the old

flume it is done in red paint

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

N i 542utl54 SW of SW of sec 36 TIOS RIW pictograph SATJSA 0TJ

this site is located in current creek canyon about 100 yards

north of the bridge and dam across the creek it is on the east side

of the road and high up under an overhang there is a line beneath

the main spiral which has been repainted with red spray paint

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42utl55 sec 26 TIOS RIW pictograph

I1 was not able to find this pictograph either it is in current

creek canyon about

pictograph

this group is located in the limestone cliff on the hill which

sits in the mouth of current creek canyon the hill is to the west of

the creek and to the south of the wolf farm the pictographspictography are high

up in an overhang and are hard to see they are of an animal several

zigzagzig lineszag and a triangular man with upraised arms these are also

done in red paintCULTURAL affiliation fremont

u k

Page 36: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

nekneb

isalt4salt

nwkawk swkawk

28

42ut273 NEneb of NE of sec 26 t10s rlwelw village

this site is located on the wolf farm on the sand hill west of

their house it is on the west side of current creek where the creek

swings around the hill the site is located on the hillside and the top

of the hill thirteen structures were visible from concentrations of

artifacts and decaying clay walls the site covers the area from the

top of the hill to the cultivated ground to the west and south and

extended to an old abandoned shack about 600 feet to the west

CULTURAL MATERIAL

556 provo gray15 provo black on gray

1 provo black on gray corru-gated exterior

4 provo applique14 provo fingernail impressed

2 provo red on gray1 provo incised

109 salt lake gray4 salcsaltsaic lake fingernail impressed

285 sevier gray1 sevier1sevier applique2 2seviersevier black on gray6 sevier6sevier red on gray5 5unknownunknown

10 projectile points2 type A

I11 type E

I11 type G

I11 type 1I5 fragments

1 shaft smootherI11 hammershammerstoneconetonedoneI11 pecked stone ball

debatageDeba34tage

agate3 quartzite

16 chert100 jasper

2 obsidianI11 andesite

1 type B drill3 knives

I11 type B

1 type E1 fragment

5 scrapers1 type E

4 fragments2 mano fragments2 metate fragments

deep trough3 type A pottery

gaming pieces

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut274 NW of SW of sec 24 tlosflosfiosalos rlwelw campsite

this site is on the dunes immediately north of the wolf farm and

current creek it is just south of a farm road and fence crossing the

dunes and is on a spur of the sand ridge the area of occupation is about

75 feet in diameter

444nek

4provo

2provo1provo

Page 37: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aqsq

baet4aet

29

CULTURAL MATERIALS

1 type A drill debatageDeba2

tagescrapers 14 agate

1 type B 5 jasperI11 fragment 1 flint

CULTURAL affiliation unknownasxs

42ut2d42u1275 neinet of SE of secsee 2323nost10s siw house clusterausterduster

this site is just west of 42ut27442ut24 and is on a spur projecting down

across the farm road and fenceofencefenced the major part of the materials came

fromfron north of the roadoroadboado no structural materials were recovered but three

depressions indicate the possibility of structures of some kindo bethe area

is about 150 et square and overlooks the same flat area that 42ut27342u1273

does and which has natural subsurfacesub irrigationirrigationoirrigationsirrigsurface

CULTURAL

ationo

MATERIAL

31 provoprove gray debatageDeba2

tagesalt lake gray 6 agate

4 sevier gray 63 quartzite2 projectile point fragments 23 chert1 type B drill 9 jasper1 scraper fragment 3 obsidian1 chopper2 hammerstoneshammerstcneshammer 1stones mano fragment

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut26 iminetIMJnei of SE of secosec 23 t10s rlwelw campsite

this site is on the north side of current creek and west of 42ut25o42ut275

it is 75 feet from the fence line which cuts the two wolf farms in halfhalfohairit is on the dune and among the juniper treesotreesgreeso toth the west the sand hillswings north to widen the valley of current creekcreeke this site is only

about 20 feet in diameter and may have been a single teepeesteepee as an irregular

ring of stokesstoresstohes outlines the site all of the materials werewregre found within

tiethe ring of stonesostonesstohesstoness

NE

fromron

76

tle

Page 38: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

nebnek nekneb

1flataflat

awkswk

30

CULTURAL MATERIAL

debatageDeba16tage

agate7 quartzite8 chertI11 jasperI11 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut277 NE of NE of sec 26 TIOS RIW

mile

west of the wolf farm the hill overlooks the exit to current creek

canyon the valley between the sand hills as well as the surrounding

terrane most of the materials were found on the north and west sides

of the summit material was scattered over an area of about 200 by 800

feet but dery thinly and with the main concentration around the summit

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

10tage

provo gray 258 agate2 salt lake gray 11 quartzite4 sevier gray 24 chertI11 type A projectile point 15 jasper2 scrapers 4 4obsidianobsidian

I11 type C

I11 fragment 1 fiatflat mano discoidal

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut278 sek of SW of sec 23 TIOS RIW

h

lookout and campsite

this site is on the south side of upper current creek just west

of 42ut273 it is on the highest point of the sand hill about

kill site

this site is located on the south side of upper current creek

on the top of a spur the site is above the western wolf farm and next

to a sand and gravel pit on the farm much of the site is windblown and

sloughing into the gravel pit it is confined to an area of about 25

by 10 feet with a firelitfirepit in the center the sand is covered with split

bones and stone chips it appears that about seven animals the size of

large deer were killed and eaten on the spot possible horse bones

the firelitfirepit was three feet in diameter and about four inches deepdeepe

dery

Page 39: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

31

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

1tage

projectile point fragment 7 agate1 metate fragment flat 54 quartzite

25 representative large mammal 2 chertbones unidentified 48 jasper

3 obsidianCULTURAL affiliation unknown

42u127942ut279 NWN of sveswe of secoseesec 23 t10s rlwelw house clustermusterauster

this site is on the finch farm west of the main road to goshenogoshen

it is on a large flat area on top of the sand hills and west of a

commercial sand gravel pitopit this site is well above the creek and

very dry but some areas have recently been plowed for what looks like

dryfarmingo there are no visible house remains but in two places

stone alignments appear to have been destroyed by plowing and a road

the cultural material was spread out over an area of 300 by 100 feet

but most was concentrated in the center of the siteCULTURAL MATERIAL

debatageDeba5

tageprovo gray

12 salt lake gray 72 agate8 sevier gray 40 quartzite9 projectile points 9 jasper

1 type A 6 obsidian1 type E 150 chert1 type F 3 andasiteandesiteanda1

sitetype G 1 calcite

4 fragments3 manosmanosgmanoag

2 flat discoidal1 loaf shaped

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut280 neenetnefnei of NE of secseco 22 t10s rlwr1welw campsite

thiss site is on the north side of upper current creek on the

bend west of the finch farm house the site is slightly west of the

old pond and cement damsdamseadamse it is at the foot of the sand hill with

re ainsdry farming

Page 40: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

32

the creek less than 100 feet awayoawayagwayo the material was thinly scattered

over an area of about 100 by 100 feetofeetfeato

CULTURAL MATERIAL

debatageDeba1

tageprovo gray 26 agate

2 knife fragments 10 chert

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut28142ut28l SWsas4 of NBNE of seesecosec 22 t10s HLW campsite

this site is south of upper current creek on a projecting spurospur

the site overlooks the farm road along the edge of the dune and iswest of a row of trees planted by the early settlerssettlersosettler A field onletonfetinletmonfet

road is just below the site and an old road used to cross the creek

to the northonorthdortho the material was found on the tip of the spur and was

spread out by the erosion to a circle of about 50 feetCULTURAL MATERIAL

nbatageitebatage1 provo black on gray 6 agate2 loaf shaped manos 2 chert

1 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut2822ut282 NE of NE of secoseesec 22 TIOS rlwhouse lusterclusteriusterthistils site is located on the north side of upper current creek

on the east end of a flat area where the creek swings a little south

before turning towards the pondopond the site is at the foot of the sand

hill and overlooks a marshlike area of the creek bottoms which is over-

grown with reeds and cattailscoattailscat theretails is evidence from concentrations

of materials of at least three and possibly five structuresostructuresstructure claydayaay from

the structures is abundantoabunda thento whole area is overgrown with sagesagcosacco

f

so

so

Page 41: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

neinef

aqsq

nan4

33

CULTURAL MATERIAL

71 provo gray debatageDeba5

tageprovo black ongray 20 agate

7 salt lake gray 25 quartzite50 sevier gray 14 chert

1 sevier redon gray 1 andasiteandesiteanda1

sitesevier black on gray

1 temperless sheid 5 projectile points1 typetypcyp B drill 1 type A

vertical1vertical mano 1 type C

3 fragmentsCULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut283 SB of nie of1 sec 22 liosllos rlwr1welw campsite

this site is south of upper current creek on the second spur

east of the power lines it is on the end of the spur among sand

blowoutsblow andouts juniper trees the area is a circle about 50 feet in

diameter this site overlooks an abandoned house of which only the

foundations remainremaine

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

52tage

agate13 quartzite14 chert

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut284 NB of 4 of secosecsee 22 t10s rlwelw campsite

this site is on the north side of upper current creek where

the creek bends northward to go to the pond it is on the westermost

spur around which the creek swings the pond supports a large duck

population and this spur is the only way to approach the pond without

being seenoseen this site is largeslarge covering an area of about 500 by 200

feet andiands probably represents a seasonal camp used for hunting and

fishing

e dr 111

11

wette ost

and

fi shing

sherd

ingray

Page 42: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

secsee TIOSlOSios

sas4

nan4 ntant4

34

CULTURAL MATERIAL

dabatagedebatageDabaDeba7

tageprovo gray 123 agate

6 sevier gray 20 quartzite1 projectile point fragment 66 chert2 knives 40 jasper

1 type B

1 fragment 1 1peckedpeckedpeekedspecked stone ball1 metate trough type

open end

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut285 nan1 of SW of secoseesec 22 tlost10salos rlwr1welw campsite

this site is on the south side of upper current creek on the

dune overlooking 42ut286o42ut286 thisblisbilsnils site is almost due south of the bend

in the creek where it swings toward the pondopond the power lines across

the dunes just northeast of the siteositepiteo it is spread out over an area

of about 200 square feetofeato

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

1tage

provo gray 84 agate4 quartzite

12 jasper3 chert1 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut286 NW of NW of secotlosSeCoT rlwelw house cluster

this site is located in the smallsnallsnail dunes and flat area south of

the bend leading to the pond on upper current creekocreekcreedo the area was

recently leveled and structural clay was in evidenceoevidenceevidenceseviden thisceo site islocated next to another flat area similar to the one next to 42ut27342u1273

and could be subsurface irrigated the creek bottom in this area iscovered with lush growths of reed and cattailsocatta itlisoilsolise is very hard to

cross the creek on foot as the mud is several feet deep and much like

quick sandosand

1metatel

42ut N

sm

cat tailstalis

Page 43: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

sweswi

blowbiowouts

35

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I1tage

provo gray 16 agate6 salt lake gray 25 quartzitequartzquarte7

tesevier gray 9 chert

1 hammerstone 64 jasper1 metate fragment 6 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut287 N of NW of secoseesec 22 TLOS rlwelw campsite

this site is on the sand hill south west of the pond there

is a small cleared field east of the dune and next to the creekocreekcreedo the

site is at the midpoint of the field in relation to the duneduneobuneo the

power lines erossacross the northeast corner of the site it covers an

area about 200 feet in diameterodiameterdiametersdiam mostetero of the materials was found in

surface blowoutsblowoutsoblowout

CULTURAL MATERIALdegatagedegavageDega

1tage

projectile point fragment 50 agate3 scraper fragments 10 quartzite

41 chert17 jasper

2 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut28842u1288 SWs of SW of secoseesec 15 closcios rlwelw campsite

this site is in the small dune northwest of the junction of

current and kimball creeks this site overlooks the junction and

a large pond just to the easteasto the materials were found in blow

outs around the sagebrush the area involved is 100 by 50 feet along

the ridge of the duneduneobuneo

17

0

N

cross

kimb

so

Page 44: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1 42ut28942u1289 NWnannun of NW of see 21 t10s rlwr1welw camp site

this site is on the highest part of the sand hill northwest of

the junction of current and kimball creeksocreeks the site is on the ridge

the most southern point which a fence line passes to divide the finch

property from that of an unknown party an old farm road passes over

the dune just north of the site the site is approximately 100 feet

in diameterdiam

CULTURAL

etereetero

MATERIALdebatagedsbatageDeba

3tage

knife fragments 106 agate1 hammerstone 18 quartzite

0 chert

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut29042u1290 steSWJsieswe of SW of sec 15 t10s rlwelw campsite

this site is on the southwest extremity of the sand ridge

north of the pond and on the east side of upper current creekcreeke an

old meander passes along the south edge of the dune and swings east

it shows up in the aerial photographs quite well this site over-

looks the pond and is situated under agroup of juniper treesotreesgreeso the

site is about 200 feet in diameterodiameterdiametersdiamdiandlan

CULTURAL

etero

MATERIALdebatageDeba

1tage

flat metate 160 agate29 quartzite37 chert

5 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

kimbnimb

4groupagrout

36

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

8tage

provo gray 19 agate1 type A knife 3 quartzite1 chopper 20 chert

9 jasper2 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

NVA

hammerstone70

S

campsite

Page 45: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

nweNWJ seiSEJ

voodyood and sagebrush that extends

across the road to lower current creek the old drainageodrainagedrainagesdrain theageo site isonly 100 by 50 feetofeetreetfeato

CULTURALCULcbl MATERIALSMATERIALAT

debatageDeba1

tageprojectile point fragment 28 agate

1 quartzite3 chert3 jasper1 sandstone

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut29242u1293 siw of 4 of secoseesec 12 t10s rlwelw house cluster

this site is on the east side of lower current creek north of

goshengosheuo it is next to the first wooden gate on the west side of the main

37

42ut291420t291 naw4n4 of NE of seco 16 ciosclos rlwcampsite

this site is next to highway 6 and west of goshen reservoiroreservoirreservoirsReser

there

voiro

is an abandoned house just east and over the edge of the duneodunebuneo

A road to the pond area is east of the site and househouseohousdo this site ison three spurs of the sand dune and seems to have been a single encamp

mentmento each area is about 50 feet in diameterdiameifcero

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

1tage

flat metate 33 agate24 quartzitequamzitequattzitequahquaMquatt

9elteziteeite

chert11 jasper

1 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut292 NW of SE of sec I1 t10s rlwcampsite

this site is in the town of goshen on the central road that circles

north past the cattle association pens north of towntowriotorrio the site is west

and a little south of the pens in the greasyoodgreasgrea eod

of

it17

SAWO

N

Page 46: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

piouplou

38

road after one passes over the denver and rio grande western railroad

tracksotracks there is a pivou throughmostthrough ofmost the site as the dirt was

used to resurface roads at the turn of the centuryocentury the site is seen

as a luxuriant growth of sagebrush and extends on both sides of the

roadoreadroadboado it is about 200 by 200 feet squareosquaresquardo

CULTURAL MATERIALMATER

debatageDebailleIALo

12tage

provoprove gray 35 agate3 salt lake gray 9 quartzite7 sevier gray 12 chert1 projectile point fragment 3 obsidian1 bone knife 1 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut294 of abtsbt of secsecosee 3 t10s rlwr1welw campsite

this site is on the white farm on the bendbendo the area involved islocated along the first eastwesteast fencewest line south of the white approach

roadoroadboado it is about 300 feet west of the main roadoboado there appears to have

been a very old drainage north of the site but the evidence is sparmeosparseo

the number of sites in this area might not mean that there was a drainage

as the pioneers record that current creek used to flood plain irrigate

the entire arecoare&oareabreaCUUTBULCMTURAL MATERIAL

debatageDebatage

of SE of seco 3 t10s rlwelw campsite

this itesite is on the hitewitebiteeitemite farm and surrounds the house and barnsobaraso

the whole group of structures is on a low group of dunesodunesdoneso the white

family remember plowing up concentrations of stone mixed with artifactsoartifactsartifact

piau throug7through

tb SE

7 provoproveparvoplavo gray 1 agate3 salt lake gray 1 quartzite

18 sevier gray 3 chert2 hammerstoneshammer 5stones jasperI11 loafloa shaped4 mano47 1 pumice

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut29542u1295 jaj4

so

7hmost

tte

loe

hoost

Page 47: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

jawj9

they think they may have been structures but there are none left todayotodaytocayo

this site is very large extending 300 or more feet in every direction

from the housesohouseshousego not one shaddshardshedd of pottery has been found by the owners

who have potted the site for years the garden of mrsmrsoarso whitehhite is lined

with manos and metatesmetatesometakesmeta

CULTURAL

teso

MATERIALdebatageDeba

5tage

knives 89 agate1 type D 20 quartzite4 fragments 14 chert

2 scrapers 3 obsidian1 type A

1 type E 9 9hammerstoneshammerstoneshammerhamner10

stonesmanos 4 4metatesmetatestatesmetakesme

5 fiats discoidal 2 shallow trough1 loaf shaped fragments4 fragments 2 flatfiat fragments

flatfiat

neeNEJ

3obbob sciclisicli an

2flataflat

aslssl

4 sinkersCULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut296 SB of NE of secsee 2 t10s rlwelw campsite

this site is on the east side of lower current creek on the dimedune

between the main north road and the creekocreekcreedo it is next to the first turn

north of the junction of the north road with the bend roadoroadboado the site isabout 50 feet in diameterdiameterodiametersdiamdiandlan

CULTURAL

etero

MATERIALdebatageDebatage

4sinkersAFF ATIONatlon

7 provoPTOVO gray 9 agate1 sevier gray 12 quartzite

8 chert10 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut 297 NW of NE of secosecsee 2 TLOSZLOS rlwelw house cluster

this site is just north of 42ut296 between the lower current creek

drainage and the north roadoroadboado it is just south of a hay storage area and

a group of trees is across the creek from the sitesiteecitee the area involved

is about 75 feet in diameterodiameterdiametersdiametero

n144

metates

CULT AL

Page 48: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

4043

CULTURAL MATERIALMATERIALS

debatagedebatagesDeba3

tagetagesprovo gray 42 agate

1 provo blackblackelack on graygrey 20 quartzite2 salt lake gray 8 chert5 sevier gray 8 jasper2 projectile point fragments 5 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliationaffiliations fremont

42ut298 NW of NW of secoseesec 2 TLOS rlwcampsite

this sitesize is between the lower current creek drainage and north

roadroade

debatagedebatages6 provoprove graygrays plain var 30 agate1 sevier graygrays plain varovar 11 quartzite1 type I1 prooctileprpctilepro 10octile chert1 hamerstonehammerstone

CULTURALCULTU affiliationsaffiliationAL fremont

42ut29942u1299 NWN of NE of secosec 2 t10s KLW house cluster

this site is on the dune between the lower current creek drainage

and north roadoroadboado the dune gives out just north of the site and the road

makes a jog to the westweste

nan4

projebroje tiletlle pointspointsspointis 14 chert1 type F 1 obsidian1 type H

1 fragment 1 hammerstone1 flat metate fragment 1 stone disk

CULTURAL affiliationaffiliations fremont

it is north of sitesate 42ut29642ut29flo there is a small jog in the road

east of the site and another hay storage area east of the roadoboado there

is a ditch through the western side of the sitesitoosidoo this site is diffuse

in that material was found over an area of about 100 by 50 feetfeetofeato

MATERIALTERIterl CULTURECULTURES

there is a ditch cut through the western side

of the site where a piece of charred corn was recovered two feet below

the surfaoeaceeaceCULTURAL MATERIALMATERIALS

debatagedebatagesDeba14

tagetagesprovo gray 83 agate

2 sevier gray 26 quartzite3 projectile

114

p ainaln

dit h

pie

Debatagetages

nes4

Page 49: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

irw114

sas4

sas4

41

42ut300 NE of SW of secsee 35 t9sts KLW house cluster

this site is between the lower current creek drainage and north

roadroade to the east across the road is a grove of trees and north is an old

abandoned house there is a ditch through the western side of the site

it covers an area of about 100 by 100 feetofeato across the road is 42ut338o42ut338

CULTURAL MATERIALHATERIALsdebatagedebatagesDeba

53tagetages

provo gray 12 agate9 salt lake gray 11 quartzite7 sevier gray 6 chert1 temperless 16 jasper1 knife fragment1 type A drill 2 flat mano fragments

CULTURAL affiliation fremontqs

42ut30142ut sekseiSE of2 NW1 of seco 35 nosHOS rlwelw house cluster

this site is about 500 feet south of the old abandoned house and

between the lower current creek drainage and the north roadroade it is also

just north of a cattle penopen the material came from three concentrations

in a line from the southeast cornercomer of the pen towards the northwestnorthwestonorthwestenorth

they

westo

are in 30 foot diameter clusters

CULTURAL MATERIALSMATERIALdebatagetebatagemebatebaDebaneba

50tage

provo gray 18 agate3 salt lake gray 13 quartzite7 sevier gray 26 chert2 scrapers 5 obsidian

1 type C 1 jasper1 fragment

1 hammerstone

CULTURAL affiliationaffiliations fremont

42u1302 SW of SE of secsee 26 t9s19sts rlwelw campsite

this site is on and around the hay storage area and corral of the

woodard property west of the salt ponds the north road more or less ends

just northeast of the siteesitecitee the site is on a low mound of sand and could

afford a lookout for a hunting campcampocampe migrating birds use these ponds dur-

ing the winterowinterkintero

42ut

s

42ut sweSWJ

Page 50: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

42ut3o442utg04 4N of NW of secsecosee

iffAFFILIillATIONatlon

t9sts rlwelw campsite

aqsq

aqsq

42

CULTURAL MATERIALMATERIALS

debatageDeba3

tageprojectile points 122 agate

1 type C 14 quartzite1 type L 145 jasper1 type 1I 110 chert

1 loaf shaped mano fragment 8 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut303 SW of SE of see 26 t9sts rlwelw campsite

this site is half way between the site on the woodard corral

42ut302 and the northernmost salt pond the site is on a slight rise

in ground and was of very short durationdura perhapstiong only one or two days

he material was found on the rise of groundgroundogroundy

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

23tage

agate2 quartzite

48 chert14 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation unknown x

TP

this site is southeast of the salt ponds and east of the temporary

pond the dune is low and surrounded by salt pans and more dulesdunesduiesdulee A high

dune to the west hides the salt ponds from viewviewovieco this site is perfect

for waterfowlwater huntingfowl as it is hidden it is about 100 feet in ameterdiameterlameterkemeteraneteriCULTURAL MATERIAL

debatagedgbatageDeba3

tageprojectile point fragments 122 agate

1 loaf shaped mano fragment 71 quartzite140 chert

50 jasper10 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut305 SBSE of SE of secosec 12 t10s rlwelw campsite

this site is east of goshen and the large intermittent pond which

is fed by the warm springs overflow thetiletlle warmwannwarn springs ditch swings around

42u S

10

N 4

MA IALlal

42u

goshen

Page 51: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

sebsek

8jasperijasperI11 scraper fragment

I11 hammersihammerstype toneE

I111

type I1CULTURAL affiliation fremont

43

the west side of the pond the area around the pond is one of low sand

dunes the site is about 50 feet in diameter

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I11tage

type C knife 5 quartziteI11 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut3o642ut306 WneaNFA of SE of sec 33 t9sts RIW

this site is in genola northwest of the genola reservoir and

northeast of 42utl0442utlo4 this site is located on an old santiquinSan canyontiquin

drainage which the dump and reservoir now fill the site is about

200 feet in diameter

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

34tage

provo gray 2 agate33 salt lake gray 23 quartzite15 sevier gray I11 chert

2 projectile point fragments 67 jasperI11 type B drillI11 stone square I11 chopper

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut3o742ut307 SEselu of efiknfik of sec 11 TIOS RIWrinNF

3provo

f

house cluster

house cluster

this site is in the town of goshen and just north of 42ut292

the material came from an area of about 50 feet in diameter and to a

depth of one foot below surface

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

74tage

provo gray 48 agate3 provo black on gray 51 quartzite

15 salt lake gray 36 chert16 sevier gray 8 jasper

5 ivie creek black on white2 projectile2projectile points

Page 52: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

nekneb

44

42ut3o842ut308 NWawknwk of SE of sec 10 TIOS RIW

miles north of the elberta project offices A road extends

to an old gravel and sand pit in the dunes the site is north of the

gravel pit on the second eastward spur of the dune north of the road

the area involved is about 50 by 50 feet three rock clusters are vis-

ible but with no associated charcoal

sek

SA

lk

campsite

this site is northeast of the goshenoshen reservoir in the dunes on

the north side of highway 6 and on the east side of the old current

creek drainage where it turned east through the dunes the site is

about 100 feet in diameter and is on the top of a sand dune

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I11tage

type B drill 365 agate2 scraper fragments 72 quartzite

58 chert10 obsidian

1 ijasperjasper2 2andasiteandasiteandesiteanda

CULTURALsitesice

affiliation unknown

42ut3o942ut309 NWNA of SW of sec 11 TIOS RIW house cluster

this site is in a field next to an old abandoned house near

the junction of the bend road with a lane which extends to the west

the lane is the first road west when one is going north on the bend

road from highway 6 the site is about 100 by 50 feet and has been

plowed and leveled

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

5tage

provo gray 9 agate2 sevier gray I11 quartzite

3 chertCULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut3lo42u1310 NWnwkawk of NE of sec 3231 t9sts1 rlwelw campsite

this site is onan a group of dunes west of highway 68 and approx-

imately

Page 53: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

42ut3ll42ut311 NWnwicwi of seiset of secoseesec 29 t9st19sts campsitecampsittcampsif6rikthis site is north of 42ut310s42ut3lo on the third and final spur of

the sand hillohill the site is on the northeastern tip of the spurospur there

was a campfire within a cluster of rocks and waste maleriamaterialsmateria 0 the area

of occupation was about 50 feet in diameterdiameterodiametersdiam theetero depth of fill was six

inches in the area of the fireCULTURAL MATERIAL

1 projectile point fragment2 mano fragments

1 flat discoidal1 loaf shaped

debatageDeba58tage

agate12 chert1 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

I1 nan4

45

CULTURAL MATERIAL

1 type A projectile point2 scrapers

1 type E1 fragment

3 hammerstoneshaimnerstoneshammer

debatagetebatageDebatebamebaneba

stones

98tage

agate12 quartzite10 chert

134 jasper1 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut312 NW of 4 of seco 32 t9sts rlwr1welw campsite

this site is just northeast of 42ut31042u1310 and southeast of 42ut311o42ut3ll

the material is clustered around a group of rocks on the north side of

the same spur that 42ut31042u1310 is ono it is about 20 feet in diameterdiameterodiametersdiam

CULTURAL

etero

MATERIALdebatageDeba

2tage

agate4 quartzite5 chert

32 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut42u 313 NW of svesie of secsecosee 15 t10s rlwelw campsite

this site is southeast of goshen reservoir and east of upper

current creek and the farm road which swings around the lower edge of

the duneodunebuneo the site is on the dune and is about 50 feet in diameterodiameterdiametersdiametero

SE

nv4

NWJ

iso

Page 54: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

neknev

awknwk awkswk

nwkawk

awknwk

46

CULTURAL MATERIAL

debatageDebaI11

tagetype D scraper 12 agate

11 quartzite22 chert78 jasper

5 andesiteandasiteandaCULTURAL

siteaffiliation unknown

42ut314 NW of SW of sec 15 TIOS RIW campsite

this site is south of 42ut3l342ut313 and northeast of 42ut290 therhedhe site

is on the edge of the dune where it sloped towards the road and creek

below part of the site has fallen onto the road the site is only

about 10 feet in diameter and has a fire lens about 6 inches thick

CULTURAL MATERIALSdebatageDeba

12tage

agate5 quartzite4 chert

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42u1315qu015 SEseksev of NW of sec 15 tlosTIOSalos RIW campsite

this site is just east of the southern end of the goshen reservoir

and is on the same dune with a cattle pen the site iois northwest of the

pen and is about 100 feet in diameter

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I11tage

hammershammerstoneconetonedone 73 agate2 manos 17 quartzite

I11 flat discoidal 79 chertI11 loaf shaped 46 jasper

2 metate fragments 3 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

i42ut3l642u1316 NE of NW of sec 15 TIOS rlwelw campsite

this site is north of 42ut3l542u1315 on the dune east of the central

part of the reservoir the site is on the southwest slope and several

rock clusters are present but there is no evidence of charcoal the

site is about 100 feet in diameter

Page 55: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

nekneb

nebnek

47

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I11tage

hammershammerstonetoneconedone 38 agateI11 loaf shaped mano 23 quartzite1 metate fragment 44 chert

24 jasper10 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut317 swe of NE of sec 32 t9sts rlwelw campsite

this site is in the sand dunes west of highway 68 and is part

of the 42ut310qu010 312 group this site is south of the gravel pit road

and on the first western extending spur rock clusters are present in

the 100 by 200 foot area where the material was found but no charcoal

was found the wind could easily blow most of the charcoal away

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I11tage

scraper fragment 59 agate5 quartzite7 chert

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

4211318 SWawkswk of NE of sec 32 t9sts RN campsite

this site is south of 42ut31742ut3l7 and on the second east west spur

of the dune system it is in the saddle of the dune there are rock

clusters present but no charcoal the site is about 100 feet in dia-

meter

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

I11tage

projectile point fragment 71 agate2 scraper fragments 6 quartziteI11 shallow trough metate fragment 13 chert

71 jasperCULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut31942ut3l9 awknwtnwk of sek of sec 32 t9sts RIW campsite

this site is south of 42ut318 on the third east west spur and

almost centrally located the site is about 200 feet in diameter and

two campfirescamp infires rock clusters are present the fires are about 20

inches in diameter and four inches deep

Page 56: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

neane4

48

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

2tage

type A scrapers 42 agate2 mano fragmentsfragment 3 quartzite

1 flat discoidal 14 chert1 loaf shaped 44 jasper

1 shallow trough metate fragment 3 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut32042u1320 NWNA of NE of sec 35 nisHIStils r2wraw campsite4

this site is in kimball creek canyon above its junction with the

dry ridge systemosystemsystems the site is on the west side of kimball creek just

south of where the road dips down off of the side of the canyon and

crosses the streamostream A cabin is above the site to the southwest and to

the northeast across the creek is a smallsmail cliff with a karst like appear

anceoance the site is 100 feet by 20 feet and follows the creek it is very

eroded and overgrown with junipersjuniperusjuni andpers boulders

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

2tage

projectile points 12 agate1 type G 5 quartzite1 fragment 18 chert

4 jasper3 andasiteandesiteanda

CULTURALsite

affiliation unknown

42ut321 sies4siwsa of SE of sec 26 TLLStils rlwr1welw campsite

thisohisohls site is on the road in kimball creekscreek just north of 42ut320

the road in this area is on the side of the canyon just south of the site

50 feet or sogsoy the road drops down into the canyon to cross the creek the

site is on bothbotkibotel sides of the road but its main area is east of the road in

the bouldersaldersbol and juniper it is about 100 by 50 feet in size

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatagedabatageDebaDaba

I11tage

projectile point fragment 20 agateI11 knife fragment 1 quartzite2 scrapers 17 chert

1 type B 12 andasiteandesiteandaI11

sitefragment

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

sm

42 sb4k

so

st

Page 57: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

dlenie

49

42dt32242ut222 abtsbtSE of NE of seesec 26 tils r2wraw campsite

this site is in the mouth of kimball creek canyon about two miles

south of the hancock ranchrancho the site is west of kimball creek but east

of the canyon roadroade just south of the site is a new fence line and fire

trail which extends in a east west direction this site is about 50 feet

in diameter and is in juniper and boulders

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatagedsbatageDeba

90tage

agate7 chert5 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42u1323 SBSE of NBNE of secsee 26 t11s r2wcampsite

this site is south of 42ut322 and on the other side of the fence

lineolineeineo thedie site is about 900 feet south of the fence it is on the west

side of the creek and a ditch runs through the west side of the site which

feeds a water tank at the hancock ranch the area involved is about 100

by 50 feetfeetofeato

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

1tage

type A knife 2 agate3 scrapers 3 quartzite

1 type B 5 chert2 fragments 4 jasper

6 andasiteandesiteandaCULTURAL

siteaffiliation unknown

42ut324 abtsbt of NBNF of secsee 26 tils r2wraw campsite

this site is on the west side of the creek and ditch but east of

the road the hills close in just north of the site to form the steep

sided canyon more characteristic of the upper sections of kimball creek

the site is about 100 by 50 feet in area

s

42ut

SE

kimb

Page 58: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

tritrlangular

50

CULTURAL MATERIAL

debatagedabatageDebaDaba1

tagescraper fragment 52 agate

5 quartzite9 chert7 jasper

15 andasiteandesiteanda1

siteopalitecopalite

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

42ut325 SE of SBSE of secoseesec 26 nisHIS RZW house site

this site is on the crest of a hill west of kimball creek and

north of the junctions of kimball and dry ridge canyonsocanyonsCanyon there is a

spring at the junction which is aided by spring runoff from both can

yonsoyonsbonso the site consists of a single round stone structure 36 feet in

diameter the visible wallswaliswails consisting of rounded basaltic boulders

averages six feet in width most of which is probably due to the wallswalosvalisvailscollapse the area is overgrown with juniperojuniperguniperojuni

CULTURAL

pero

MATERIALdebatageDeba

59tage

provo gray 90 agate159 sevier gray 12 quartzite

7 sevier red on gray 142 chert9 projectile points 48 jasper

1 type D 8 andasiteandesiteanda1

sitetype G 15 basalt

1 type 1I 2 obsidian6 fragments

3 scrapers 3 hammerstoneshammer1

stonestype A 1 triangular mano

2 fragments

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42ut326 NB of SE of secsecosee 21 nisHIStii r2wrawS campcampsitesite

this site is in the angle of the junction of kimball and dry ridge

canyonscanyonseCanyceny theonse road goes up to the side of the canyon at this point and

the site is west of the road in the boulders and juniorjuniprjunip0rjuntjuni thepr site isonly 50 by 20 feet in area and very eroded

42ut

b

w aqsq

78

42ut 26 aqnq

so

widths

junetlonionton

Page 59: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

neknev

neknev

awknwk

awkswk

51

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

1Itage

thin discoidal shell bead 26 agate7 chert2 jasper9 andasiteandesiteanda

CULTURALsite

affiliation unknown

42ut327 NW of NE of sec 35 t11s r2wraw house cluster

this site is on the west side of kimball creek and about half

way between the junctions of dry ridge with kimball creek and the

junction of garbett gulch with kimball creek the site is east of

the ditchoditchdetcho A gully separates the site from the rest of the mountain

the area involved is 100 feet in diameter in a clearing

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

11IItage

provo gray 72 agate19 sevier gray 15 quartzite4 projectile points 31 chert

I11 type G 4 jasper2 type 1I 17 andesiteandasiteandaI11

sitefragment I11 opalitecopalite

3 knivesI11 type A 4 scraper fragmentsI11 type B I11 deep trough metateI11 fragment fragment

CULTURAL affiliationaffiliations fremont

42ut328 SW of NE of sec 35 t11s r2wraw house cluster

this site is north of 42ut327 and overlooks the junction of kim-

ball and garbett gulch canyons the site is on the west side of the

creek and north side of the junction the site is on a ridge which pro-

trudes out into the canyoncanyonocantono it slopes both into kimball creek and gar-

bett gulch the site is in the heavy sage but is clear of juniperusjunipersjuni

there

pers

are two stone foundation to structures both of which are square

and about 14 feet to a side the whole complex is about 75 feet in

diameter there was one large metate left at the site

Page 60: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

kimbnimb

52

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

72tage

provo gray 83 agate104 sevier gray 7 quartzite

1 sevier surface manipulated 20 chert1 ivie creek black whitekbitekaiteon 4 jasper6 projectile points 4 obsidian

2 type C 15 andasiteandesiteanda2

sitetype E 3 opalitecopalite

1 type G

1 type 1I 1 type A drill2 knives

1 type B

1 fragment

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42u132942ut329 SWswi of NE of secsecosee 35 TUSHISeisels r2wraw campsite

this site is northeast of the junction of kimball creek and garbett

gulch and on the opposite side of the creek from 42ut328o42ut328 it covers an

area of about 50 by 50 feetofeato the road crosses the site before dropping

downclowndoun to cross the creek for the second timetimeotineo

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

3tage

provo gray 10 agate3 sevier gray 5 chert3 projectile point fragments 8 jasper1 long flat mano

CULTURAL affiliation fremont rfoj 0

nie of neinet of secosec TUS r2wraw campsite

this site is on the opposite side of the creek from 42ut32742u1327 the

areaaurea involved is great as a gully cuts through the site and has washed

the materials down to the creekocreekcreedo thezhehe original site probably was small

and in the upper one fourth of the gullyogullygullye

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

2tage

projectile points 10 agate1 type 1I 27 quartzite1 fragment 12 andasiteandesiteanda

10site

chert

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

surfaceaee

0

42ut220 NW NE

Page 61: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

acedlatedlacedabed

sestwentvent

tec100yec

sllsilsif k csas ir aingsjings 1 attieittleattle dog

yon

utiluiliuni nown

I1 3 road swings acrsc kimball creek and

en weh

vestwest side

atedbated tntiltii ate overlooloverlooksovercooloverloveci theoolooi

la ft where th og C nyonsdyons juncbunc ire the ite is southwest of

th in and cover an ara of about 100 feet by 50 feet

cnxuilal 1 1.111

I1

eccc 555 TIIStils househouR cierclercleeCLcljalj

f

er

tiiethetiledhetlleI1 jurnjury

bevber

sotesobe

debdebu

westwesc

slosio

li71

theche E

laylaj sluesite

tudalnural

arbettrbett gulch

eetbeet

i bizal1izalTJRALvital MATERIMATERmaterialirm

an7n

awkswk

aj1j igegeI11 knifekn d7if a

53

2ut3j3l2ut331 SWsw14 0 sec 35 tilstilgtii WS campsite

TV tj toheobee isi ins tli agieiglpagleiglan between the jctionsjtirztionsactions of kimball

creek an

jards a hunthuntt cabincabiri on the west sidesido of the creek

fhe sit a out 100

ge1 type C dr 3 agate

i quartzite11 chert

5 andesiteandasiteanda

jlitlsite

AFFIaffy i

42ut332 SW of sec t11s campsite

hshis site i kimball ek on the so ern

slo t e hill w- c c cabin is

1

J quartzite12 chert

3 jasperCULTURALUi TURAL ilixljn unk

SW 0

s J or i ft n of lit c

u J caical and of the hill sgcthwestsocthwestsouthwest of thetqetae

r c on the lat the site inits cut on the westwet side by tle ditch

a 00200 b 00 feet n si2sia the fill is at least one footboot thick

01 1ht a pa 1 A e sic

t we

t1&ge

I1

5

tlb- o0J junccire

t 11 N

n

42u42jj 3 svj1 E SA

c ij L n

C a r

rv

on

TII11I I

ar- a

Ai

h

lre lue

tie

age

uge

bards

da

aht

ta

Page 62: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

seiSEJ

54

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

16tage

provo gray 79 agate13 sevier gray 29 quartzite

1 unknown sherd 26 chert5 projectile points 2 jasper

4 type A 25 andasiteandesiteanda1

sitefragment

4 scraper fragments

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

42u1334 SE of sw4swi1swibswa of secoseesec 25 t9sts rlwelw campsite

this site is east of the northernmost salt pondponds but well into the

dunesodoneso there is a large salt pan between the site and the pondsopondspondzo the site

is in the junction of two dunes and is on the southeastern slopeslopoosiopeslopok it is

also on the eastern tip of the dune which flanks the southern side of the

salt panopan

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

8tageagate

I1 quartzite5 chert

50 jasper4 obsidian

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

SE of SW of secsecosee 25 t9sts rlwelw campsite

this site is 500 feet west of 42ut335 on the same dune which borders

the salt panopan this dune curves back around to the south and east like a

boomerangoboomerangboomerangsboo themerango area involved is about 75 by 50 feetofeato the site would make

a good hunting campocamp

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatagenbatageDeba

272tage

agate16 quartzite30 chert1 jasper

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

1

agaie17

42ut sas4 S

MA IALlaligl

Page 63: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aqsq

aqsq

55

42ut336 NW of SW of secoseesec 2 TIOS rlwelw house cluster

this site is just north of 42utlo242u1102 near the bend in the roadroaclroaul the

site is in the field south of the road and was discovered when an irriga-

tion trench was cutcuto the area involved is 100 by 100 feetfeetofeato an abandoned

house is north of the site and across the road

CULTURAL MATERIAL

debatageDeba8

tageprovo gray 3 quartzite

1 provo blackelack on gray13 sevier gray

1 sevier red on3 salt lake gray1 type A pottery gaming piece

CULTURAL affiliationaffiliations fremont

42u133 sajsbj of SB of seco 15 t10stlosalos rlwr1welw campsite

this site is on the north side of upper current creekocreekcreedo 42ut280

is 500 feet to the southeast and 42ut28242u1282 is about 1000 feet to the south-

west the site is first under the crest of the dune and next to USBR

marker gulloG theU areallolio involved is about 50 by 75 feetfeetofeato

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

4tage

provo gray 25 agate1 salt lake gray 2 quartzite1 corn cob fragment 14 chert1 type B knifeI11 mano fragment

CULTURAL affiliation fremontfremaFrerafrena

42u133842ut

ont

NWnaana4 of SB of secoseesec 5 t9s79sts rlwr1welw village

this site is on the east side of lower current creek and northeast

of 42u430042uooe the site is on the east side of the north road where a irri-

gation ditchditth has just been cuteuto the trench cut through several strucstrue

tures and there were materials recovered from 150 yards of trench mater

1 alsais were in evidence as much as two feet below surfaceosurfacesurfacsurfaced the area involved

i s about 450 long and at least 50 feet wideowidedideo

42ut nv4 S

redon gray

42ut23z aqsq

27

is

eo

11

lais

Page 64: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

42jb342jb73 nell of wf of secoseesec 1 HISnis rlwelw source area

thisclis site is located on the east side of upper current creek in

juab county it is south of the bridge and irrigation damsdansodans A dirtroad goes around the dam and past the edge of the site the site is on

the third spur through which the road cutscutsocitso the top of the knoll is the

site and on both sides of the canyons are agate nodules some of which

range up to several pounds in weightoweightleighto A large yellow brown jasper

boulder was also found on the west side of the roadoroadboado

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

3tage

projectile points 58 agate1 type C 19 jasper1 type E 9 chert1 fragment wyMV p&wFP moollookM

CULTURAL affiliation unknown

footoo

56

CULTURAL MATERIALdebatageDeba

8tage

provo gray 11 agate6 provo surface manipulated 8 quartzite

10 sevier gray 9 chert3 ivie creek on whitewitemite3 unknown1 type projectile point1 type D haftedchafted knife1 shaft smoother

CULTURAL affiliation fremont

87surfaceaee

black

MAT AL

0

nwe

paw

Page 65: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

wideghideg

thisethisq

57

CHAPTER FIVE

excavation OF SITE 42utl0242utlo2 WOODARD mounirMOUNDS

thisohlsohis site was named after the woodard family of goshen who have

protected the mound on their property from pot hunters and cultivation

for many yearsoyearspearso farmfannfant roads were cut through the northern tip and west

ern side of the mound but otherwise it is in good shape 0 jay woodard

and carl hugh jones surface collected and tested the mound in 196101961iggithey reported a large number of knolls gray sherdsosherdsshards

the mound is 1 miles northwest of the town of goshen out on

the bendroado it is located in the SW of SW of secoseesec 2 TLOS r1wraw

of the santaquinSan 15taquin minute quadrangleoquadranglequadrangles

prior to excavation the mound was covered with a high growth of

ragweed which hid all of the surface features and made exploration al-

most impossibleoimpossibleimpossibles the mound is about 100 feet long and 50 feet wide 9 the

axis being oriented in a northsouthnorth directionodirectiohodirectionsdirectsouth itionolono is about five feet

above the surrounding surface at its highest pointopointcointo the desire to eccaexca

vate this site grew out of its excellent state of preservationopreservationpreservatipreservations

nomalnormal stratigraphic section of the site first revealed a layer

of late trash and dung of variable depthodepthdepths below this and to a depth of

about 1 feet is a sandy soil with a comparatively high percentage of

artifacts this soil showed little charcoal or decayed organic materialomaterialmaterialematernater

A

ialolaiolaiq

second layer averaging 14 inches in depth was filled with refuse

charcoals and red ochreoehroomehrooachre the line between these layers was somewhatsomevhat hazy

kno2lsgray

21

bendI1

road S t1os9 rlw9

21

ono

swe

Page 66: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

annlnnklesclesumes

58

in most areas 0 at a depth of 2 to 3 reetfeet was a layer of sterile sand

that was probed to a depth of five feet in one place in the back hoe

trenchtrenche there was no indication of cultural remains below the sandosand

before excavation was begun the site was laid out with a control

grid of two meter squaresosquaressquarestsquar sinceeso it was later decided that measurements

were to be made in inches the squares were converted to six foot size

with six inch balks for stratigraphic controlocontrolcontrolscon Atrolotroio datum was established

by placing a large spike in a log once part of an old barn and hay stor-

age areaareaoarcao the spike was six inches above surface and all measurements

of vertical displacement were measured from this point with the use of

line levellevelsleveileveis so

the initial test pit L was placed eighteen inches east of the

dutumautum as surface collections indicated a concentration and associated

featurefeat ofureare some kind charcoal was encountered at 22 inches that seemed

to be part of a very thin roof of some kindokind at three feet sterilesand was encounteredcuntered in the northern part of the squareosquaresquardo an area of soil

color indicated an ancient disturbance of some nature in the southern endoend

this was excavated and revealed two cachepitscache inpits a shallow pitlikepit arealike

fonlytonlytoniydonly six inches deep but irregularoirregularirregulars A shallow trench six inches wide

peddledpa thebillednilled uthwesternsouthwesternse side of the pitlikepit areaoareaarcaolike three post holes

were aisoalsobiso boondfoond see figure 2oao20 the excavated area had the appearance of

a ud reo

anotherarrArckrc testther pit to the south 2 was sunk to the same depth to

test the sie of the pitlikepit arealike the use area was encountered in the

arthnrthneifneiiheii andth east in highly irregular form and confirmed my opinion that itwas a use alreasireaosimeao another cache pit was encountered and three more post

moldsomoldsgoldso the use ateaareareatea ended two feet into the square with two irregular

protrusions to the east and southosouthboutho

21

fl

enc canteredcuntered

ex avatedabated sh ow

2

A 1le f

3

Page 67: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

westawestq

59

arrangements were made to have the boyouobyu9 1966 field class go out

to the site during thanksgiving vacationsvacationsevacation I11 third test pit was dug to

the south 3 and eleven post holes were encountered that indicated a

structure very possibly a surface earthlodgeearth oflodge deviant type was being

uncovereduncoveredouncover anotheredo test pit 4 was expanded to the west and six more

post holes were found which tended to support the original hypothesisohypothesishypothesist

in totaigfcotaly eight feet of a north wall and six feet of a west wall of a

structure were uncovereduneoveredo in the west side of square four a large cache

pit was also uncovehuncove redo during the excavation of squares three and four

bryant and shurmanshuman jones stopped by to test soil dampness for excavating

a ditch for one of the local residentsresidentsoresident the ground was too dampdamps so they

offered the use of their backhonbackhoebac forkhoe the afternoon they dug two trenches

just west of square four one extended to the west 271 feet and the other

to the south for 32 feetofeetreetfeato in the western trench was encountered a large

cache pit four feet west of square fourofourcouro this cache pit was covered with

a crib of logs placed six inches below the lip of the pito all of the

logs were charredocharredarredoch the bottom three were aligned in a north south dir-

ection and above these were two aligned with a eastwesteast orientationoorientationsorientwest

this

ationo

effectively sealed the pit whim contained much decayed materials

but nothing recagnizablerecognizableorecognizable

the southern trench contained two featuresofeaturesfeature the first a shallow

trenchtreneltrenah 111 feet deep and 111L feet wideodideo it cut across the trench at a 30

degree angleangicoangie sixteen feet south was a large pit structure of undetermined

sizeosizedizeo A test pit placed within the trench at the lip of the structure un

earthed a large potpoitpost hole one foot in diameter and 2 feet deepodeepceepo it looked

very similar to the king posts found in middle missouri earth lodges of

uncovered

dill ch

2

sh ow

pit212

se

so

so

i

recagnizablezabie

byul

Page 68: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

11do60

thomas riggs derivation this does not preclude any relationshiprelationshiporelationshipsrelations thehipo

trenches were cleaned up and profiled while the features were being ex-

cavated

THE STRUCTURE

only the northwestern corner of one structure was excavated at

the sitesiteopiteo this one was rectangular without clearcut walls

FEATURE 11 figure 3

shipeSHAPEsSHAPE appears to be rectangular

dimensions excavated portion of north wall 8 feet

west wall 6 feetfeetofeato

foundation surface sand artificiallyartificia leveledveledoleilyliyllyFLOOR packed and leveled sandsando

ROOF SUPPORTS appears to be a line of posts down the

center line of the structurestructuroo

ENTRANCE unknown but possibly the shallow trench in

trench B is a tunnel entrance to the structure

FIREPIT none found in excavatedxoavated sectionssectionoseationsect

FLOOR

tonoionolono

PITS none found in excavated sectionosectionssect

associations

iono

two large cache pits to the west and one

shallow trench that might be part of a

ventilator shaft or entrance tunnelotonnelo

COMMENTS it appears that this structure was collapsing

and the walls reinforced in and out and finally

torn down due probably to the unstable nature

of the sandosandsande

tren h

cavated

Page 69: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

61

figure 3 feature 11 woodard mound

this structure appears to be of the surface earthlodgeearth typelodge as

found at nephi willard and beaver this structure differs however

in that it is rectangular rather than oval and incorporates what appears

to be features of jacal structures in that the side walls are set into

the ground instead of just leaner posts

USE AREA

there was only one use area excavated at the site it is de-

fined by a highly irregular shallow pit and associated cache pits

this area was only eight feet from the house but not next to any vis-

ible entrance

FEATURE 3 figure 4

SHAPE irregular shallow pit

dimensions 5 by 5 feet in the excavated area six inchesdeep

A

limie or lxcavalionPOST HOLES

CACHE PITS

Page 70: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

unfinfacedaeed

62

PIT WALLS unfaced native sandosand

FLOOR irregular compacted sand

ROOF possible r ftinada arrangement evidence of burningoburningburringoburn

FIREPIT

ingo

none found in excavated area

FLOOR PITS two cache pits in the northeast two cache pits

just outside the southwest side trench just

outside the northwest side

associations none

COMMENTS none

figure 4 feature 171 woodard7 mound

POST HOLES

CACHE PITS

v SHALLOW PITSOF USEAREATTSRARRAUSETTSR AREAARRA

0

v mada

A

6 2

fet

Page 71: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

feature j9ja

feature 8

s

feature 4

feature 1

figure 5 cache pits of the woodard mound

63

feature 2

yeature

Page 72: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

blackblaek

64

CACHEPITSCACHE

A

PITS

total of 5 pits which presumably had been used for storage pur-

poses were excavated at the woodard mount figure 5oao50 three of them were

away from houses but next or part of the use area two of them were next

to the house allgli of these features appear to have been contemporaneous

as all lips appeared on the edge of the sterile sandosand

allaliail of the pits fallfalifail into the same class straight sided cache

pits with rounded bottoms 0 they all had either a very short neck or else

no neck at all and a diminishing body which reached its smallest diameter

at the bottomobottombottolo depths ranged from six inches to three feet maximum

diameters from two and one half feet to six inches the pits ranged from

circular through oval to irregular in outline it is possible that the

smallest pit is a post hole of irregular shape one unusual cache pithas already been described which had a covering of logslogsolocso

CULTURAL MATERIAL

SURFACE19 provo gray debatagenbatageDeba

2tage

provo on gray 81 agate10 sevier gray 20 quartzite

1 uinta gray 29 chert4 salt lake gray 1 jasper1 type I1 projectile point 1 obsidian1 glass bead1 loaf shaped mano 1 shaft smoother

SQUARE 1 LEVEL 149 provo gray debatageDeba

1tage

provo surface manipulated 111 agate21 sevier gray 28 quartzite

2 sevier surface manipulated 28 chert1 sevier red on gray 8 jasper

11 salt lake gray 8 obsidian6 uinta gray

30 ivie creek black wiitewhitewaiteon 5 projectile point3 temperless fragments7 miscdisc nailsnallsnalis cartridgecartridges leather 1 knife fragment1 type B drill 1 tubular bone bead

5

f

sm est

19

M pulatedpalated

sv

Page 73: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

as1s

blackonblackbon

65

SQUARE 1 LEVEL 289 provo gray

2 provo surface manipulated3 provo redonred grayon2 provo black on gray

35 sevier gray3 sevier gray surface manipulated3 sevier

30 salt lake gray3 knolls gray6 uinta gray5 ivie creek blackblaek on white4 temperless1 unknown sherd1 type A drill3 scrappersrapperssc

1 type A

2 fragments2 bone awls round4 bone flakersflamers

2 type A

2 type B

1 washerwasher11 bone bead1 pottery pipe fragment1 figurine fragment

SQUARE

g

1

ng

USEAREAUSE12

AREAprovo gray

2 sevier gray1 sevier red on gray3 salt lake gray1 knife fragment1 figurine fragment

SQUARE 2 LEVEL 144 provo gray

2 provo blackelackblaek on gray2 provo surface manipulated

18 sevier gray1 sevier red on gray

10 salt lake gray1 salt lake surface manipulated4 knolls gray3 knives

2 type B

1 fragment1 type C bone gaming piece1 type A pottery gaming piece1 figurine ragmentfragmentfragment

debatageDeba228tage

agate39 quartzite65 chert9 obsidian

45 projectile points10 type A

2 type B

2 type C

1 type D

2 type E1 type K

4 knives2 type A

2 fragments2 shaft smoothers1 flat metate

framentfragment3 bone gaming piecespiecesj

2 type A

1 type B

1 type A potterygaming piece

debatageDebaI1tage

agate1 quartzite9 chert

debatageDeba15tage

agate5 quartzite9 chert

6 projectile points2 type A

1 type C

1 type I12 fragments

1 type A flaker1 washer shell bead1 slate figurine

19

red on gray

f

17

29

f

11

Page 74: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

as3s

66

SQUARE 2 LEVEL 248 provo gray

9 sevier gray17 salt lake gray

1 knolls gray1 uinta gray2 ivie creek black on white3 temperless1 type E scraper2 hammerhanmerstones1 shaft smoother1 bone punch1 figurine head1 type B pottery gaminggaining piece

black on white

SQUARE 29 USEAREA13 provoprove gray

1 sevier gray4 salt lake gray4 ivie creek black on white1 stone percussion flaker1 harpoon head bone2 figurine fragmentsrag

SQUARE

ments

3 LEVEL 12 provo gray

2 provo black on gray6 sevier gray

14 salt lake gray1 uinta gray3 temperless1 type A drill1 hammerstoneI11 round awl

SQUARE 3 LEVEL 246 provo gray

1 provo surface manipulated10 sevier gray

1 sevier surface manipulated5 salt lake gray4 knife fragments2 drills

1 type B

1 type C

1 rocker type mano

debatageDeba23tage

agate10 quartzite12 chert

5 projectile points1 type A2 type C

3 fragments3 knives

1 type A2 type B

debatageDebanonetage

1 type G projectile point1 type A drill1 type A pottery gaming

piece y black on witemite

debatagedabatageDebaDaba12tage

agate13 quartzite

1 chert

3 projectile points2 type G

1 fragment

debatagedabatageDebaDaba3tageagate

1 quartzite

6 projectile points2 type A

1 type B

1 type C

1 type E1 fragment

29

hammerstonesshaft

2 9 USE- AREA

f

9

27

white

heads

Page 75: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

as5s

6

SQUARE 4 LEVEL 169 provo gray28 sevier gray

5 sevier surface manipulated1 sevier red on gray5 salt lake gray1 ivie creek blackelackerackbrack on white1 knife fragment1 washer bone bead4 pottery gaming pieces

3 type A

1 type C

5 bone gaming pieces4 type B

1 type C

SQUARE 4 LEVEL 240 provoprove gray

7 sevier gray4 salt lake gray1 knolls gray1 type B drill1 loaf shaped mano2 round awls1 figurine fragment1 clay object

SQUARE 5 LEVEL 1126 provo gray

2 provo black ongray17 sevier gray

2 sevier black on4 salt lake gray1 uinta gray1 temperless1 unknown3 ivie creek black whitewitemiteon1 flathatnatfiat awl2 intrusive buttons

FEATURE 8 CACHEPITSCACHEPITCACHE

3PITPITSpitt

projectile points1 type C

2 fragments

debatageDeba7tageagate

2 quartzite2 chert1 jasper

11 projectile points1 type A

1 type C

2 type D

1 type I12 type J4 fragments

3 misemisconisco metal and leather

debatageDeba28tage

agate10 quartzite13 chert

4 projectile points1 type A

1 type C

1 type G

debatageDeba16tage

agate4 quartzite1 chert

3 projectile points1 type C

1 type I11 fragment

1 washeewashed bone bead

debatageDebanonetage

1 tubular bone bead

67

49

49

gray

85

ingray

Page 76: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

BACKHOE TRENCH

3 projectile points1 type A

1 type C

1 fragment1 shaft smoother4 manos

2 loaf shaped1 faceted1 flat discoidal

1 tubular bone bead2 figurine fragments1 flat awlI11 type B bone gaming piece

68

debatageDebanonetage

3 knives1 type C

1 fragment2 scrapers

1 type E1 fragment

1 deep trough metatefragment

BACK HOE

Page 77: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

I1

I1

vav1

P tf07

0

0

0

I169

j0

6 i

scL

S

stt&D

c

s a 9 S 8 js 1 j g S S j a i 1

square I1level 1I

square I1level II11

square II11level I1

square II11level II11

square 111IIIlilliilevel I1

square 111IIIilllevel II11

square IVlevel I1

square IVlevel II11

square V

level I1

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x presentsk absent

comparative DATA ON POTTERY TYPESTIPES OF THE WOODARD MOUND

figure 6aaa

w69

Z

cE

T ccct

0

1

Page 78: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

I1

70

V

0

ttsS

z a

0

square I1level I1

square I1level II11

square II11level I1

square II11level II11

square 111IIIlilliilevel I1

square 111IIIliilevel II11

square IVlevel I1

square IVlevel II11

square V

level I1

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

S f St L 0 vZ Q 5

uj a 5t

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

0 2i s tS I1x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

t 01 s 1

z

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

SAME DATA WITH ceramicsclusteredceramicclusteredCERAMICCERAMICS

figure

CLUSTERED

6bab

10

cLV

2

Q

U 1

i

Page 79: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

I1

71

t s

5

3

I1S

V

i

9

6u00 0

sC

1

f v

5

b

JG

tf2I1

1

c

c

0Tr

J T a 9 1 0S 1 0

i i sf J S

square I1level II11

square II11level I1

square I1level I1

square II11level II11

square V

level I1

square 111IIIlilliilevel I1

square IVlevel I1

square 111IIIlilliilevel II11

square IVlevel II11

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

SAME DATA WITH SQUARESSQUARED CLUSTERED

indicates there is only one major group of potterypresent with four major groups of traitstraitsetraipse it alsoindicates a difference between the groups of potteryused at the use area versus that used at the houseit would appear that the concentration in the usearea indicates that most of the living did go on inthis area

figure 6cac

SL

CL

t2

6.6

0N

Page 80: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

SANDsanoI1

INTRUSIVENORTH WALL SQUARESOIJARE ts ZW2&w D WHITE

CLAY

13 SANDY

FILLifr0

as2s

1

0centimeters

i

feefeeta

tooloo100 r

3

FILL

FILL WITHFIRED CLAY

FILL WITHMUCH

CHARCOAL

0 isanoJSAND

FIL L

ROOFFI L L

r

t

Ix r1

00el

Page 81: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

J

DDa

ot

EASThast WALL TRENCH 0

ARC AL

ILI

IA

L

OIL

T E

CLAYolay

E SA

aro

oll

Page 82: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

fathaith

ah7h7

an analysis of the two arbitrary levels of 42utlo242u1102 was accomplished

by lumping the top level of square I1 through V nithwithirithrithi the surface collection

and comparing this with the lower levels of squares I1 through IV along

withvith the use area sherdsshards from squares I1 and II11 the original levels were

arbitrary but did divide the normal stratigraphic section in half

UPPER COMPONENT LOWER COMPONENT

245 provo gray 52575152.5751 256 provo gray 60.6635606635112 sevier gray 24.0343240343 2 sevier gray l06lclogic

49 salt lake gray 10615010.6150106150lo 636150 salt lake gray 14.928914928911 uinta gray 236052.36052360512.3605120605236051 7 uinta gray 1.65881658834 ivie creek 729617.29617296117.2961122961 11 ivie creek 26588

blaekblack on white alackhiack on whitelabite8 temperless 171674171671.7167 7 temperless 1.6588165884 knollskno graylislls 8584.85848584 5 knorisknojiskno31 gray 118481.18483 unknown 6437.64376437117 1 unknownunknoni 2370.237020702370

T 99999899999 72 99998799.998799998712 99

ath

99871

minorninori variations the proportion of type to type is about equiv-

alent and both groups follow the same frequency pattern to such an extent

that it could be safely said that both layers should be considered a statis-

tical unity and the mound a single occupation site of either static material

culture or short duration with a rapid accumulation of material the

equality in number of sherdsshards tends to support the latter hypothesis but

further analysis showed up something curious A treatment of the use area

againsta theadnstadest house or structure turned up quite a different result the

useube area was defined as squares I1 and II11 rithzith the associated features 3

as determined brithwithirith the cluster diagram figure 5cac the house feature 11

as associated ithwith squares 111IIIlillii to V

72 17 0 616gig

s 1 1848164 40

vdethith

h thesispothesisprothesispo

1 71674TL s

Unknoni 237k46 99 999

tith

Page 83: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

lleile

llelie

liddid

ceramiccramic

96.9939969939 while the use areuarea contained only 87.8378878378878378 of the utilitari-

anilitaralitar

types thevie termrprrn utilitaiutilitayutil iilaitai hereinere means the surface manipulated and

painted varieties of provo eviersevierevler salt lake and uinta grays the

ivie creek black

75

USEAREAUSE COMPONEcomponlirCOMPONAREA HOUSELIr COMPONENT

267 provo gray 51.5444515444 213 provo gray 63772o6377263772063772.6377297 sevier gray 18.7259187259 77 sevier gray 23051230023.0512305176 salt lake gray 14.6718146718 32 salt lake gray 9509.509580m15 uinta gray 2.895728957 2 uinta gray 5.5

41 ivie creek 7.915179151 4 ivie creek 1107yblack on white blaciblaclblace on white

11 temperless 2123521232.1232.1235 4 temperless 11976110761.10761.19768 knolls gray 15vc I11 knolls gray 2994729947029947.299473 unknown 5792.579257921.57921579257921 1 unknown .299429942994

518 99.99999999 334 99999699.9996

the use area had 21.5921592159 184 sherdsshards more pottery associated witwlch

it than the house and had a much broader frequency range of typecype

the widest of graphicalgeographicaleo areas such as outlinedoutlEoutie byned ambler

1966

N

1 V 7

1 99 9 996

ul1

z

from tetie salt laf-e type for this analysis

the two nalysesanalyses of components taken together indicanindicjitsindicat that the

site is laterally differentiated by use but vertically stable through

time this had a bearing on the interpretation of surface surveys and

chronological parisonscomparisons between sites it would appear riatlat only

complete excavation can yield sufficient data for inter site compari-

sons beyonbeyopbayon

cc

asso-

ciated with it flefietierie house seemed to be strictly utilitarian in cramic

n white bosbcilsbails never show any evidence of cocking or

storage marksmarke tetoe temperless and knolls gray are too fragile forcor any

known use beyond decoration it is for this reason that knollknollsknoils gray is

separated r m

nalyses ind icAt

pari sons

950

diat

tle

parlparnsons

154411.5441J4 41

Page 84: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aq1q066706

7

CHAPTER SIX

CERAMICS

sandlingsampling methodmethodsmethode of the seventy four sites in goshen valley thirty

three ieldedfielded pottery during the course of the survey at all the

campsitescanositescamnsitescamocano ansitessltes attempt was made to collect all artifacts but at some

of the larger sites such as the village sites only a statisticalsample could be taken

types and varitiesvaritieseparitiesVarivarl thetiestiese criteria for the analysis of pottery from

goshen valley was like in most utah ceramics by temper and surface

finish the initial identification was based mainly on rudy 1953

and deblooisdebDeH 1961967Loois but their criteria later had to be abandoned in

the process of analysis of the pottery from the brigham young university

1966671966 field67 class at the hinckley farm sherd samples were submitted

to drdre hyronmyronwron ceC best of the brigham yound university geology depart

ment for petrographic analysis the sherdsshards were a representative

sample of the then tentative system as outlined by debloois 19645511967455119645196745

the sherdsshards were identified as sevier gray snake valley gray great salt

lake gray and turner gray cisco variety before and during the pro-

cess of identification the writer discussed with dr best the criteria

for the identification of the tempering agents he identified the temper

on the basis of nonresidualnon propertiesresidual of the clay each fragment of

temper was found to be freshly broken and angular with no trace of deco-

mposition to indicate that they may have been residual particles of the

th e

0

51

sandli

Page 85: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

coimeola ion

jahj1h e

udededed

mam9

77

clay none of the feldspar identified was of a transitionaltransition nature the

grain size and relative abundance between 9 and 16 of total constitu-

ents and occuranceoccupanceoccur ofance particles not common to clay were also used in the

criteria for the identification of thetjie temper dr best was as surprised

as myself to find not one tempering agent in many of the sherdsshards but as

manynany as three types he expressed the opinion that the particles did not

come from a single source althoughalthoucalthous ah crushed mica granite could be the

tempering agent in salt lake gray granite also could have been used in

provo gray dr bests results are as follows in order of highest percenpercentpercentotc 7

age temper to the lowest where biotite occurs in the paste it isincluded in the percentage relationship this is relative as heavily

micaseousmicaceousmi pastecaseous might not be included if the temper is of a corres-

pondingly high percentage some of the results appear to be weighted

from this builtinbuilt biasin dr best did not know the type of sherdsshards he

was working with beyond the fact that they were fremont this was done

to insure against bias in looking for established criteriasherd 126a a calcite feldspar biotite

herdsherd 126a b welded tuff feldspar biotite

sherd 126a c feldspar biotite quartz

sherd 126a d obsidian basaltic glass

sherdshend quartz biotite feldspar

sherd ll8a118allda b obsidian quartz feldspar

sherdeherdsherd 18acll8ac obsidian feldsparfelds quartzpargpangpany biotite

sherd lisailsalita d welded tuff quartzquartzy feldspar

sherd 121a obsidian feldspar biotite

sherd 122a a obsidian feldspar biotite

sherd 122a b quartz biotite feldspar

C cac3

inc

0 D

12 aaa

he1 rd 118 a- as

pondingly

I

lon

Page 86: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

surrsurfsuurance

ilslisais

I1 sid

I1lacla ll8adilljalllja ilca11call3alicalldad I1LD 121a121 b and 117117c

chetherho leiipcringlelbeiuel agent associateassociated aithilh7ithi hese shardssherdsshcrlsharl is cid

5sparspryr and quartz rithitheth obsidian oftenoflen resentresepresen Lc nd biotic

bozioncozion in the pastepasticpastiepastue

saitsalt5 lakeit gray fortierFor obsidiannierrier aidand wartzyartz te ipcred grcgrca

salt lake gray represented in tincthetino samplesampiele by sherd lioa

I1

I1 td CD

forrlerfornier

salsai ilelielle

naemae

nhonno

calcai cite tempered

ichluh

abilbi iocular micro3co 0L 1.1

lollo10110 viin inconinfonaallionaltion

inalinvl ic

neitroteitro c rodA

t eachcachachC sherdsherl uncerunder a binocular microscope cvcaivc hc

following information the differentiation between crushed 0 sidian

ifeldspafoldsp&i an quartz is impossible undrundarandar the binocular microscopetaicrosco

sevier

oc

gray former vesicular basalt or basaltic lass tempered

sevier gray represented in this samplesauble by shoulssherls 12a b

126a d liba118 d and 112a tlleiliezileitie tempering agent associated

with these sherdsshards is welded tuff and asalticbasaltic classjlassilassblass oftenoflen

ithrth 7feldsparfeldfeidreid acandsoarv quarlequarlz and somesone niarnicr

provo gray former obsidian tempered sevierseerseen gray representrepresentedropresentby shards 1212sa c

and 32231223 b the tempering agenasagencsangentstangents ateCTQarere the sacsaicsalc as provo

gra but with micaracaacanicanacar added to thetine pastei oraste surracesurface to create

a decorative effect these sher Is are considered to be a0

i xt lype but tinstino layay be invrlidinvalid as soicsolc shardssherds thoughtlhoughlghoughtoughtGh

to bebe arlts3tsrlt lake gray ere discoverer to fit onto J of

provoprove gray this happens often

unita gray former calcite turner gray cisco variety

ohlsthischisonis type is represented in the sample by only one sherd

126a120 a theilietilelile tempering agent in this sherd wastas calcinocalcibocalcitcalcatcalcai illthirithilithrdeitcit th

S Un

D rsherdherd llalia quartz biotite feldsparleids1eldsfelds

sherdlierdilerd1 112aS feldspar biotite basaltic daosdags

3orllig shardssherdssho accordingds to the original sherdsherrlsherri analysis adeide hy

clushilciashuig p

Yto

lan

irmpo isible

quar s 0 mi c

122

U s

r r id

co ion

G

11s amp C

0 te perin

effectact Ilr1 e

tt t iisa j i

rai r

1

b

ci

iasaltic

ad

a

ten c reddedald

each

vlin

lon

ras

resent

arca

at

Page 87: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

79

an equal amount of feldspar acid tests revealed that feld-

spar residues are common in the other sherdsshards classified as

uinta gray

the new taxonomic designations were felt to be necessary as the

old names have so many different descriptions of the same potter typetypeotyped

also the new evidence for subdivisionssub withindivisions the fremont have created

a tool for this classification sevier gray has been defined as being

tempered with 1 basalt lava mica and obsidian malouf 1940 2

obsidian with small amounts of quartz feldspar and mica rudy 1953

3 idiansidian and basalt taylor 1954 4 vesicular basaltic glass

quartz with mica present taylor 1957 and 5 the same as turner

gray emery variety sharrock 1965 debloois 1967 emery variety

has been described as 1 angular fragments of light gray rock possibly

the mancos siltstonessilt wormingtonstones 1955 2 crushed igneous rock

gunnerson 1956 3 light gray rock ultimately of igneous origin with

feldspar and quartz in the matrix taylor 1957 and 4 porphyritic

rock lister 1960 taylor 1957 differentiates between turner gray

emery variety and sevier gray on the basis of temper basaltic glass

is the criterion for sevier gray while crushed igneous porphories are

left for the turner type however debloois could find no significant

difference between the sherdsshards he examined at the university of utah

and he showed me one pot where all of the inner surfaces of the sherdsshards

were labeled sevier gray by one person and the outer surfaces labeled

turner gray by another

I1 was able to identify a few sherdsshards as having identical tempers

as ivie creek black on white which were different from the sevier gray

sherdsshards with basaltic glass or welded tuff

I1

Page 88: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

80

the term provo gray is an outgrowth of amblers 1966 sub divi

sion of the fremont into five areas the provo area gives the pottery

a distinctive name and leaves the sevier area with a parallel name for

its main pottery type

the term salt lake gray has been adopted because the old great

salt lake gray has been defined as 1 quartz and mica tempered enger

1940 2 obsidian and quartz with mica added to the paste rudy 1954

3 obsidian and quartz in micaseousmicaceousmi pastecaseous taylor 1954 and 4

possibly sand tempered ambler 1966 the term great was dropped as

being superfluous and to differentiate between my criteria and the

older ones

knolls gray has been kept but as an extreme variant of the salt

lake variety it appears to be a functionalnonfunctionalnon decorative variety as

the mica is present in such quantities that the walls of the sherd can

be crumbled in the hands and will fall apart when wet

snake valley gray was not submitted in the sample because no sherdsshards

were found in the survey and excavations which fit the definition of

being sand tempered meighan 1956 rudy 1953 and taylor 1954 to

name a few all state that snake valley gray is sand tempered the part-

icles identified as temper in provo and salt lake gray were all freshly

broken sharp edged no wearing fragments they do not fit the defini-

tion of sand by kuenen 1960 the term sand as geologists use it means

an accumulation of sedimentary particles having a diameter between .0505

and 2 millimeters large grains are called gravel while smaller ones a

are silts or clay sands come from limestone feldspar or quartz in

fact quartz is so much more abundant that in referingferingredferingre to sand the term

usually means a quartz sand sand particles always have some edge

roundcound ing from wind movement or show water polishrounding

05

Page 89: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

004ool001uteryautery

ouldouid tie in with debloois if the difference between provo and snake

valley gray could be reconciled there are hints in the literature that

much of the snake valley gray is tempered with crushed quartz rather

thanchantharlrhall quartz sand and if this is true as debloois indicates then the

conger and provo areas may be brought into a much closer relationship

I1 have listed the pottery types according to a rather inclusive

system as all plain undecorated sherdsshards are lumped together under a plain

variety all coffee bean applique

ola011her

varval

axonomictaxonomic system presented here

varitiesparities

31

other factors whichkiichbilchblich requirerequdequ enohalisenohasisennenoern werehasis outlined by blooise91ooi810015aloois in

nisn nalysisnalyislysisnallisnainanalS ofyis surface manipulated shardssherds from the wasatch fron c argaareaarellavea

1975520196745521975196745 he520 pointed out that many forms of surface manipulation

occur onoiloinorn the same sherdsshards althoughalthouah these are used as criteria for setting

up vailtiesvarlvailvari ofties pottery such as those from pargonahPar meighangonah 1956o195601956the cnlyanly valid method of decorative analysis would appear to be through

whole vessel analysis the suggested

punched incised applique noded

incision etcetcoecco are surface manipulated varivanitiesties all painted sherdsshards are

classified by slip and by color

the result of this taxonomic system is somewhat simpler to handle

than deblooisqebloois 1961967 505150 and51 is outlined below

FREMONT TYPES AND VARITIESVERITIES

TYPETYPEs SEVIER GRAY tempered with welded tuff and basaltic glassglass with varying amounts of feldspar quartzand micamicaemccae the mica is usually sparseincludes pottery formerly classified as seviergray and turner gray emery variety

Varivanvahvarl ties

sevier gray surface manipulated variety

sevier gray red on arakgraygrakorayorar variety

sevier gray black on gray variety

re ei in out ined

C

an llysisulysisclysis

3

T b1moo100mlo1 soo

0 11

52

althou ah

ba

Page 90: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

82

TYPE PROVO GRAY tempered with feldspar quart and micapossibly crushed mica granite with some

obsidian added to a majority of the sherdsshardsincludes pottery formerly classified assevier gray

varietiesprovo gray plain varietyprovo gray red on gray varietyprovo gray black on gray variety

provo gray black on gray exterior corrugated variety

TYPE SALT LAKE GRAY tempered with feldspar quartz and obsidianmica added to the paste and surface fordecorative effect formerly great salt lakegray

varieties

salt lake gray plain variety

salt lake gray surface manipulated variety

salt lake gray knolls variety

TYPE TURNER GRAY tempered with crushed porphyreticporphyriticporphy rockreticultimately of igneous origin includespottery formerly classified as seviergray and turner gray emery variety

varieties

turner gray plain variety

turner gray surface manipulated variety

turner gray black on gray variety

turner gray ivie creek black on white variety

TYPE UINTA GRAY tempered with crushed calcite and feld-spar with some mica in varying amountsamountsoamounformer

tsutsoturner gray cisco variety and

promontory ware

varietiesuinta gray plain variety

uinta gray surface manipulated variety

uinta gray coarse variety

inc I1 udes

Page 91: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

afffffdofdov

bahtwahtboht

lo10 I1 00 0

vypvye

orvprvarvtplnabsb

ancang

ohmohn

timrim

QTS3

07ot

loio

itlteldelp

134434

efaelc

nejdij

viestvlistaoa202

trsars

bocool

at5t

Cinfitnfit f

RCORCaeoeco O

cncPAP

S 1 Xnvf

f6fPM

sfir uffeiffealfflf

efcM

anolllnollthollnij

vitst0 hm

fiCU

t N i

63 3

to10

0 1 aooZ

2

sa3200

0

CZ

fc

56

tcoICOido

3676

1

if m7

n o0

7 75

Z v&sl

itiits ii n

lctfif

ht

v8

9797.kyi

crs50 6

y

131

YW1

ujiS sas6 S

c 1 & 1

20

151 0.0

S 2&s

I1 .1010

l2 11.11

01 0

4

1

5 1

oo00

9

3ra7531 y 76

IY iollol101lotlonion

2

27

oocngi v

lysr

y sac

Z as4s

C CC CCO

CT

i ice c

C f

qura

if

3t7

7

k73

7 sic

1 73.73

6

z T ag7g A 7 44. a j r 777 Z7 7 0

2 cjtS G L ac 100loo 170 6 CC

1 N anqn 0 fC 7

1341.34ogkoga

9

1

z lic L txo S I1 C

T j an&n

kakkvk k

v NT f

ewtvwt C w AY

bwhtr

totsktottk 5uhe N T

176TQ craera t C 00f

c foofcocooecolecyecrec eae6 bereclerec

co

c

naai

paa

loi

obra

73

zoo

naf

afir

au

ma

va

abo

1011.01

S 6 .07070

1

7

ao2

Page 92: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

leleozeoC dedoveder rdeleeawa1walma

I1 10001

1

5- 3505- 9560 7 f750F 37150 g 272 7

72067&06

70to

malvMAIV

0

0 cl

2 3 7

galgil

arvorv

hiravywiravy

as5s

twry cu0

9yvuce

ft

w6gfl

srrpt

M06

Pig PLyraf4rv

kytuc k

i C

aj AJ

sr

akafixira

lc

V

tetc

7j s

cr

7

i

fo

ory urff

1

1

1

A r y

7 fc

7 22.

oc

30 5

c- o0

1 1

A y

6

ty7 9560

y

rc1

42 777

7so

y

st09sT6

09S 71

7

r

53 tj bocoim60ooco llailaita 51

lec

TW ry

A

TE tc

y

7 l sl

3 ifc

v stirw7

5 3

ude

sur

toc

tsz 45

0000

awry

vyv

wa

tecc

aj

icc

aso

stira

aalallaai

6

WQ

oieole f41fieviij

0.0

571757.17

707.0

S 454.5

91

A

ils

Page 93: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

soosao500

awdnadnae

tvelveaveWK

I1

AJTMrtjvrj

T

karmeemeg

frI1

L

sehsheelmpimnachaq

tookoo

4424921 1

iniinf zurzut

ntiftc

triairigaaa4 r Q q 4 lt 5 2 a v

RWDW 10 1

rwd i

fyftifvr i

rrT

fimft11 16 r

rr

ftlt t kfr7

P 1 N1

jKN w

t fa

cowfhowfmowetarmttrmlzraazra smosrxossrosixos

07 aaa001 cv Z O0 0000 boco&ocoaccotork

4

6

606

c

f

1

i

1

t

1 1

ac7c

yi6

ia co

tri6tri ofcro7j6 aur79Aur 4cr479 crtlfc

t

3i

is 3a

SSS 464S SS6

1

1

2

ucyc

1 17

5 2

7

S afo9fo 02

a

c

cs7b

C

cf

r37

c16 c

rrr1

r 606 dad50 fa- e 72 2474414 110 lf si

ika IV I1

6 CON

cac7 0

4421

15iroito j A el V

PC k 7 e el1 171 7

4

wigr LU V T yo i

aAC

S oo

iya

oddo

falt

bcr

aa

ucac

csc ra

Page 94: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

tucfuctacarioroooo

I1 4

3 SO

1

I1

103107193

ifksif 0Ks

6

ailaib

teuluu

1112

34343 7

S

gimgit

gyeggenysoms

ayruff

nccfcc

iccifc e3

11 MZ

av3v

twc iryw air7b Q irztoi rypwsumvft

IO101c4t6fl

eV

uyrM

rc6rr

LT L 1

plirkc

hcc j

i

1rfranrzn

tt

1iljj500

wvw1

cTY- S

S OOQ

t

r0

llotco110tto

yw

1 5c

Z n

o

yty

4 0ri

1

0

1 q0c&

lco6feedlfe

s7

eDledi

77iszi0

0 17.17

3 1

3

l

Ss

1

9z

111.15

35b

1

izr3072

S

347

1 r

5

t 1

1 ogOZ

5115311

7

0 1 G3

7

1

5552.52

tvftf ro

SGO560O

30.1730173017

O0

1

r

z

o

pyy

0

1 q 1.1 L utzot 33awopwohwoomo x 6066 7 7 c F z

sas46two

1 4 ojoCIO 717

rcaregwegL 16 R

lp i tj

L ickstrus PC

3 7 SG octactG

0

3i6

cl

if

177 5

1 3 Z TS75

73 3&

lip

kir

17

teff

toetog oo00

avei wnm edthtdth

52

217

irow

ikc

arf

waw

ea

ac

aty lcou

feeal

sa

ia

ai

0.0

Page 95: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

87

sherd analysis the most numerous type of sherd collected in the

process of survey and excavation was provo gray 5609165609167o5609167056.0916 this

type is represented at most of the pottery bearing sites as defined

as a feldspar quartz obsidian tempered type this pottery is common

throughout the provo area and is also found to be present in the

sevier area

provo gray is generally medium gray in color but ranges from

very light gray to black predominantly fine textured this pottery is

often smoothed on the exterior and sometimes polished often the temper

is visabledisable on the exterior and interior where it appears micaceous as

the sharp edges catch the light and reflect it the interiors of the

jars show striations

several varieties of provo gray are represented as outlined above

the most common being the plain variety the sample of pottery from the

survey indicates a low number of surface manipulated types but a sur-

prising number of painted varietiesprovo gray plain variety 53.8931538931 is an undecorated well

made medium gray pottery found in the shapes of large wide mouchmouth glob-

ular jars and a few bowls in general this variety is harder better

polished and better made than the closely related salt lake type

provo gray surface manipulated variety .94669466 is the most

common decorated variety all of the sherdsshards collected by the author

seem to have come from globular jars and all were exterior decorationsodecorationsdecoration

the decorative techniques ran from fingernail incision on the body

t

in

so

coffee bean applique in single rows applique nodes applique bands

that are punched or incised and punctate sherdsshards incision is limited

to parallel bands around the neck of the jars or else angular lines

across bands of appliquedappliquesapp clayliqued

538931

9466

Page 96: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

88

provo gray red on gray variety .15271527 was found at several

sites and in all cases seems to have come from large globular jars allof the painting is done in crude brushed strokes with considerable edge

smudging decorative elements appear to be very wide lines in hollow

triangles or diagonal lines from the lip to the body of the pot

provo gray black on gray variety 10681106817o10681701.0681 is the most common

painted variety and all the sherdsshards appear to have come from interior

painted bowls these are always well smoothed on the interior and occa-

sionally well polished on the exterior the designs tend to be linear

with many solid triangles which are hooked to lines to produce a sawtooth

effect lines range from 116 to 14 inch and occur in different kinds

of patterns and panels occasionally the base of the bowl will have a

spiral with a central design step design elements are also important

provo gray black on gray corrugated variety 030503057o.0305030570 is very

rare and is represented by a single sherd from goshen it had the typi-

cal single line beneath the lip and linear decorations the exterior

was finely corrugated and very well made

sevier gray was the second most numerous type of sherd collected

during the survey 5016795016797o5016797050.1679 this type tempered with basaltic glass

and welded tuff is easily recognized by the darkness of the particles

the basaltic glass is vesicular and quite distinctive often particles

are very large and show through on the surface the sherdsshards are gene-

rally gray to buff with many that are fire blackened some of the sherdsshards

were quite orange with the appearance of having been retired but they

also show firing clouds the forms seem to be wide mouth jars and nar-

row mouth jars with lip to body handles there are some bowls known

sionally

0305

Page 97: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

89

most of the sevier gray pottery is undecorated and classified as

a plain variety 28.9466289466289466 the surfaces are smoothed and sometimes pol-

ished the interiors remaining striated the bowls have well smoothed

interiors and polished exteriors which sometimes have a coating of red

ochreachre

sevier gray surface manipulated variety .39693969 is restricted

to four different kinds of treatment in goshen valley A noded applique

treatment is the most common with an equal amount of fingernail incisionincisionoincisionsincisi

the

ono

number of surface manipulated sherdsshards is much less than the number

found farther south debloois 1967o19670

sevier gray red on gray variety .67176717 is much more numer-

ous than the provo variety these sherdsshards are the typical unslipped type

with a much wider range of painted designs they all appear to be jars

with exterior painting the most popular design element is a thin line

and open triangle but examples of squared double lines and solid tri-angles are common often the lines have faded or have turned very dark

and are much cruder than any of the black on grays this type is report-

ed from nephi gooseberry creek and fountain green by debloois 1967

sevier gray black on gray variety 152715277o.1527152770 is rare in goshen

valley in comparison to sites farther south the only design elements

represented in the valley are single lines beneath the lip of the sherd

and lines across body sherdsshards at all anglesoanglesangiesanglelo debloois mentions interlock-

ing scrolls dots fine line sawtooth line barbed line circle nega-

tive circles square triangle stepped line and parallel lines de-

bloois 19675657196756salt lake gray is the next largest group of sherdsshards represented

1659541659547o1659547016.5954 this type is rather hard to judge as only the percentage of

1967

57

3969

1527

165954

Page 98: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

90

mica and darkness of the paste separate them from the provo type there

appear to be a valid regional differentiation of these sherdsshards so the

type remains in the system jars and globular pots seem to be the do-minant forms with some bowls and water bottles this type is tempered

with feldsparfeld quartzspar and obsidian

again the most common variety is the plain variety 10.1679101679

which is very dark with conspicuous surface mica the sherdsshards are not

well smoothed and usually pitted some of the sherdsshards have a paddle and

anvil appearance with no sign of interior striation but rather undulat-

ing surface

salt lake gray surface manipulated variety .15271527 is restrict-

ed to fingernail incision and then only rarely this seems odd because

just north at the hinckley site a majority of the decorated sherdsshards arearc

salt lake gray

only eight salt lake gray knolls variety .27482748 were recovered

and these only from the woodard mundmoundwundhound they were almost 30 micamicat and

very delicate several sherdsshards were destroyed in screening aeas they would

crumble when pressed against the screen

turner gray is represented by one variety which is porphyraporphyraticporphyritic

rock tempered there are a few of the ivie creek black on white sherdsshards

16489l64897o16489701.6489 scattered throughout the surveyed sites but most of them were

found in the woodard mount this variety is white slipped on the interior

surfaces with the outer lip often slipped also it would appear that itis rare farther northward and is known from nephi and hinckley this

variety is very common in the san rafael area where it reflects south-

western traits and design elements lister 1960 the design elements

acearcare similar to those found on the other painted sherdsshards but with an even

c on

tic

2748

Page 99: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

raicai

linesalinesq multiple lines and stepped lines various kinds of circular

lines and designs are also presentpresentocresentopre allsento the sherdsshards are highly polished

on the exterior and allailali have red ochreachre applied to the exterior A few

rare sherdsshards have a fine line around the outer lip of the bowl

uinta gray 05915491.5491 is represented by plain sherdsshards only they are

calciteral andcite feldspar tempered

91

greater variety the goshen sherdsshards included open triangles usually filledwith dots solid black triangles squares sawtooth lines barbed lines

fine linesiines

and light gray in color this type is rare

in the valley but theune sherdsshards are well made and smoothed no polished

sherdsshards were foundofoundboundo the forms seem to be restricted to wide mouth

globular jars

A few sherdsshards of what has been identified as shoshonishoshoneSho wareshoni 030550

were foundfoundoboundo they are sandand crushedrockand cruerushed- ro ck tempered and very crude in

appearance the sherdsshards are reddish brown with large fragments of temper

protruding from the surface the surfaces are poorly smoothed and very

pittedpittedo one sherd had crude fingernail incision

several temperless sherdsshards 59 were found that appear to be

from miniature vessels in imitation of tempered provo varieties it has

been suggested that these were childrens playthings or practice vessels

reworked sherdsshards these are somewhat common objects in the fremont area

but are most common in the provogprovoyfrovog uinta central sevier and northern

san rafael areas these artifacts are represented by three main groups

GROUP A figure lo1010 6 specimens

this group is represented by worked circular sherdsshards with no holes

drilled in themothemthenothen two specimens are striped with black and one

identified as a provo hlackonelackblackblaek grayon sherd and the other one an

ivie creek blackonblackbon white

0305

s

594594.5945 94

Page 100: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

91292512

xk

NI

A

I1

REWORKED SHERDS

A

alvliv

L Yf

v ymf

E

afv

ri v 1

l11 vr

t

WpvNS

i a

1

H

MV

M f

VB

V

J

ilv i

n f iwwn

r

fc

y

wwWD

lw

F TYPETIPE A

G TYPE B

H TYPE C

PIPE

I1 single prolanprolcn pjpft

REVTORKEDRLVORKED SHERDS AND PIPE frafiment

figure 10

V

M

w

vj

A v

ell

rF G

brokeiolpipe

F T

Page 101: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

93

diameter mean 1 1332 inches range 2 to 78 inch

GROUP B figurefiore 10 1 specimenapeci

this

mennen

is a worked circularaircu sherdlar with a central drilled hole the

sherd is ivie creek blaekblack on white

diameter 1 12 inches

GROUP C figure 10 1 specimen

histhis is what appears to be a specially made sherd of discoidal

shape so that the edges are pointed and the cross section istriangular the center is drilledodrilleddri

diameter

lledo

1 14 inches

the above are considered to be gaming pieces in this paper the

holes are to hold a thong or cord of some kind bone gaming pieces which

complete the set often are drilled either in the center or on one end for

stringing these pieces are described by culin 19074449 as being

part of a dice game and for turning the dice while in a basket or bowl in

which they are being mixed often these turners also act as dice in the

game and therefore the use of painted sherdsshards in making these gaming

pieces

pipe one fragment of a straight pipe was recovered from square one

level two at the woodard mount the fragment is the narrow end with the

bowl broken off the remaining section is 1 14 inches long and 9l6916giginch in diameter where broken and 14 inch at the narrow end it ispierced with a hole down the long axis 116 inch in diameter

g ng

flore

speel y

Page 102: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1deblooisblooisaloois 1961967 because the requirements change with the needs of thetine

survey an attempt was made to seperateperateseparatese the points into large aprehenscoraprehens vf

categories which still differentiated enough attributes so that comparative

studies could be made berges 1964 modification of a point classification

system as advanced by haury 1950 is too cumbersome to use as the points

arealreatre separated by nonsignificant attributes

A drawing of each point was laid out on a table drawings were

clustered as to fundamental blade shape notching and base curvature the

recording system is somewhat close to that used by lehmer 195 in the

river basin survey papers

thiethle

CHAPTER SEVEN

NON CERAMIC SPECIMENSSPECMENS

oilppedstoneaifipped Astone fairly large samplesampie of complete chippedhipped stone specimens

were recovered during the course of the survey A variety of different

kinds of stone was used as the raw material for the manufacture of the

worked stone all of the varieties of lithic materials are common to

titelitetiye vicinity of goshen valley except for the obsidian which must be

portedimportedii from southwest of the tinticgintic mountains

projectileerojectile points 189 specimens the smallsmail light pressure flaked

projectile points from the survey were definatlydefinablydefi designednatly for arrows A

majority of the specimens are from the excavation of the woodard mound

there was no attempt to place the projectile points into typologies as

envoivedenvolvedinvolved by rudy 1953 taylor 1957 wormington 1955 berge 1964

and

sample c

co 1 11

eooarati F

clazssifie tion

pojilsjnls

1954

snails

uhe

Page 103: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

Wlv i

i kJAr

c B

fe

f

L mw

projectile POINTS

A P TYPE A

Q s TYPE B

figure 11

95

A B

F

V

G H

K L N

ol01

R

E

L v

Page 104: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

icancanioanloan l6la16716 inch range 58 to 516516 inch

these points group A and B are common in the provo and sevier

subdivisionssub anddivisions have been found at hinckley nephi spotten

cave grantsvillegrantsvillegGrants meadowmeadowsvillevilleg and kanosh but these points are

more characheristiccharacteristiccharach oferistic the uinta and san rafael subdivisionssub

where

divisions

they are very abundant especially in the uinta basibasl

caldwell village big rock boundryboondry village and marigold

cave areas and dirty devil areas

716216

saes2e camensclmens

GROUP A figure ll1111 31 specimens

triangular with slightly convex bases stemless maximum width

at base edges straight or slightly convex

length mean 1 ll6116ilglla inch range 1 3 t 7578 inch

width mean 1932 inch range 1 to l6la16 inch

GROUP B figure 11 4 specimens

triangular writhwith slightly concave bases stemless maximum

width at base edges slightly convex to straight

length mean 3132 inch range 1 l6la16 to 1116 inch

width

emery poplar knob old

woman etc

GROUP C figure 12 15 specimens

triangular with straight to slightly convex edge straight

base side notched on lower one third of blade maximum width

at base

length mean 9l6916gig inch range 15161516 to 1932 inch

width mean l6la16 inch range 12 to 1332 inch

34 to

716

basiij

width 716

caves

Page 105: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

alifralfaalf

M k NP

Q R S T U

A J TYPETIPE C

K 0 TYPE D

projectile POINTS

P U TYPE EV & W TYPE F

X & Y TYPE J

figure 12

97

A Bc D E

HK

flif

v w x y

PROJECT

Page 106: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

98

GROUP D figure 12 6 specimens

triangular with straight to slightly convex edge convex base

side notched on lower one third of blade maximum width at baseobasebabeo

length mean 716 inch range 78 to 2132 inch

width mean 1532 inch range 58 to 716 inch

GROUP E figure 12 10 specimens

triangular with straight to slightly convex edge concave base

side notched on lower one third of blade maximum width at blade

length mean 34 inch range 1 316 to 916 inch

width mean 1532 inch range 12 to 516 inch

GROUP F figure 12 3 specimens

triangular with straight to convex edges notched base side

notched on lower one third of blade maximum width at base

length mean 2932 inch range 1 18 to 1116 inch

width mean 2532 inch range 12 to 1932 inch

these groups C D E and F are on the border between being

common and abundant they are found commonly in sites in the

uinta provo and northeastern san rafael sub divisionsodivisions they

have been found at hinckley west canyon grantsvilleGrants spottenvillecave turner look and caldwell village they are present in

the sevier conger and southwestern san rafael region but

never in any number it has been suggested by mock personal

communication that this type was emphasizedreemphasizedre with the fremontfremFrer

intrusion

montoontmonc

into utah but was fairly common in the center desert

culture sites

s p ec imensamens

s ec imensamens

sp cimenscaimens

subdivisions

Page 107: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

vav1dth

cavegcaved

baseabaseq

rp

GROUP G figure 13 14 specimens

triangular with straight to convex edges corner notched expandedepbase

anded

much smaller than blade maximum width at notch

length mean 2132 inch range 1 14 to 1116illgilig inch

width mean 1732 inch range 1316 to l6la16 inch

GROUP H figure 13 2 specimens

triangular with straight to convex edges corner notched ex-

panding base just smaller than blade maximum width at notch

length no complete specimens

width no complete specimens

these groups group G and H are common along the wasatch front

of the provo fremont area as well as the uinta area they have

been found at hinckley spotten cave the ivie creek area and

in the uinta basin they are much more abundant in the western

provo sevier and southern san rafael areas where they appear to

have been introduced by the anasazi

GROUP I1 figure 13 12 specimens

triangular with straight to convex edges parallel notched square

base maximum width at notch

length mean 78 inch range 58 to 532 inch

width mean 9l6916gig inch range 78 to 38 inch

GROUP J figure 12 2 specimens

triangular with straight to convex edges parallel notched rounded

base maximum width at notch

length mean 1 1332 inch range 1 34 to 1 116116itiilg inch

width mean 1532 inch range 9l6916gig to 616616gig inch

716

seviI1 er

212re

figure 122

Page 108: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1A

I1 TYPETIPE G

J

tabeab

100loo

i WA W

F abcvbc G tag i

w

A

0 TYPE I1

projectile POINTS

P TYPETIPE K

Q R TYPETIPE LS TYPETIPE M

T TYPETIPE N

figure 13

B c

H

D E

I1rj

K L m N 0

p R

S T

Page 109: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

alamulam

manimami

triangutriangi

GROUP K figure 13 11 specimensos

triangulartriantilan

ecimeno

withaularrular straightstraistzai edgeht parallel notched triangular baesebease

niaximum width dfat botchonotchonotcllh

length 3 inch

width 12 inch

these groups group I1 J and K are rare in the fremont aridandarld are

generallyZene notrallyraily diagnostic of the sites oheytheyoney are present in uiehieule

provo

c

and

I1

seviersevicrsevich divisionssubdivisionssub but always in a minority they areame

definitely associated rithwithnith fremont sitessltes but appear more often in

hunting camps than

GROUP L figure 13 2 specimens

ovate ithwithvithvithu very convex edges slight concave depressions in lower

one third of blade convex base maximum width about one half way

up the blade

length neonmeonmeenmeneenmeln 3 Aen inchrichJ range same

width mean 916 inch range same

GROUPGROUT M figure 13 1 specimen

triangular with straight edge side notched with large dee con-

cave notch in base maximum width at base

length no complete specimens

width 916 inch

GROUP N figure 13 I11 specimen

triangular irregular edge expanding triangular base inaximun

width lt base straight base

length 9l6916gig inch

width 916 inch

3

34wi C tat1I1

ar ee

sitesq

house clusters

lar deep

1

i

at

co-mplete

p

triant alar beset

ri adrnu n ibidiqid th

speelI1

mensnens

Page 110: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

536586386

rodnonred arallarbll ar y system of significances so thatU furtheri

sitec

at

recordste could be syterdtizedsysteirdlizedc

there wervers

comdomdonoutipull sr

severalsevercil hundred fragments that could not be classifiedclaselaseias

mosthosthosl

sinnedsifted

of the poltepoirsdoirs eretere madenadema cfde hert andai agteagid withte somesopiesonesoplewit jasperh atarajid a

fexfewcowrex quartquartzitezite and obsidian all of these materials are readily availabler3v3dlableavaalable

in many areaareas lng girfencurrentoirfen ctr0 kjinballKJin creekballbailbali andsnd the gintictintic mo

tiplid liduld

lleile

cewrew

linlyn

nthnith

anging

la4laa

ifaif7

eicenseimensnens ninety ix111

of them canevanerane from acthe excavation at the wbadardwoodard mound 42utl02 sixtytwo of the points c frcrfi saueesqu&esau oneareaye nd two in1 associationn with ththethu

usc areaareaearcaardeae only

atyity

these groupsarcgrc grupgruts LIID M and N ayeare very rredreaxeadeare and in fact coiacoij d be

called unique in thehe abreoareoameoameare other points similarsimsiasla toila-a type L were recovered

by the author in sitessltes in le houlehouse range near white valley which seemed

to be associated with plute or ute sitesesinese this type was also found in

white valley by bergebedgebc 1961964dgerge it would appear that these points are late

hunter and gathering lypeso they are typically made of obsidian

there aregre some weaklyiesseweskneses inln this system as somesoriesone points inter-

grade

in

and

terZ

others deviatedevladeviadewia fromfrone the ideal but theresthereis some basis for co-mparison and one dcedctidati nonot needn tced keepkeenheent in1 mind1 hundredsn of variablesvariable

while studying the cyptyp lgi 0 A computer analysis should be made of all

recorded point attributes andcind theirt1eir stdtisucal significance noted the

fremont aeasaaas need

As things rov 4 andane projectileproiesproiec pointskleilekie dopo-i notntsants seem to be a criterionrifor 4

terion

culturaculturalculturelorkor affiliationaffiliofaffaft byndiliof thehetle largelargest gorlestegoriestegoresgoriesgerieste somesoloesomacoresgores eijew datadad3

prepared by ambler 1966 and the sprttenspottenaspzspz cavet analysisanaaraer oflysis uiethe statastrata

fied site doe indicate tha there areire somesmes affiliationsaffilaffailme theiativns zavecave did

have points asociatedrsoclatedassociated idithirith the lower and upper levels rith a majoritymajornajormajoe

of41ty

themthentherlA in the Fremfremencn level

of allailali AB prjctlle panispclntspcnis recoveredaccoverccove 136286redned specimens

hj irtyrtyarty cnec fromfronfrne the squares associatedsocialed vithwithbrith the structurec tr licturp

sxe c

an4qlue r type

si es 1 yi lie

U e

e

gather rq typ- s

t

ss

statdstilcal

a eas

f ztjj0 as1s t

rig crr kj iai a tint is 1 01

t a aY

s

th

etl1 2 eimens

42u 102

and

m a s

nonarblt apyary

severcil

C r r

1 i bc pd

gnup

erg

ulat

alid

119

ule

103

agi

aynd togores

acal

aas

airty sociales

ats

Page 111: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

bawvawnaw

rayflnyelnyee

I1 SA 0u

trJL

A1

I1 T Tx Y

lt2n2suvr2w2

jaj&

2ts323

JL

UVO

asfs

ijt32s

l

urn3

3

4 un3

wn

lvr30ttvro

403

X2ar3oz

2u

103

3012jt3o1

r

4

wrawwr3wwut320

uracura7

ubes

21

4tz30

I1

4aw

I1

ryfl

X X X

1 X

X X

Y Y VX A JL JL

I1 X

X X X X

X X X

IE

X

h

I1 OON

A IT K r

2vrio22vvlo2

ovoovy

atacblacaaa& al- ac aaa0 aaa7 A A A A

103

g accoaffo A

X X

a

Xu-

a A4

XA A0

r f

ii

s7

tj0

Xjk k jaj& jaj&

t2

C

1

E

distribution OF projectile pointsfigurePOINTS 14Figure

42mi 7

burao

urna

au

una

Page 112: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

tireethree of the points came from the back hoe trenelltrenchtrenelh and one fronfroli hethe surface

zhethe distributions4cribution of pointspointe supports the hypothesishypohydo thatthesis fremont sites are

laterallylaterlatex diffaren2ateddifferrendifdlfallyaily toferren a greater degree than they are vertically

the use area is clearly differentiated from the structure in function ac

already shown by the ceramics it would appear that many of the weapons

were hatted in the use area nothing else would explain the great numbers

of finicjed nd unbroken points

scraperseScra 62perse pecimenspecimenpec thisimen group of chipped toolswools has been classified

by their lack on specializedspedialized characteristics they are rather arbitrary

in function andend could have been used for multiple purposes some of then

could have been knives or choppers or just about anything else A few of

the flake thumbnailthwnbna sized scrapers ore snllsms11smilsall enouhenoughenoah to have been projectile

points they do have too much curvature and could have been modified for

hafting so easily that this seensseems very unlikelylikely there are five categories

of scrapers these should not be considered rigid classes but as clusters

around a mode or ideal type and many intergrade many of these are frag-

ments ndaridcridclid are not classifiable

GROUP A figure 15 6 specimens

elliptical side scrapersqscraperssscrap irregularerss in outline both surfaces

fullylully flanedyflakedyflaked retouchedtouchedretoucherre sides 14 possible specimenspecimensespecimens

LENGTH 1 151615116 inch range 2 14 to 1 14 inch

WIDTH 1 18 inch ranerange 1 14 to 78 inch

GROUP B figure 15 3 specimens

discoidal side scrapers irregular outline both surfaces fully

flaked pressure retouching common three possible specimens

LENGTH mean 112 inchgincha range 1 14 to 1 34 inch

WIDTH mean 1 14 inchgincha range 1 to 1 12 inch

clascias sintsiftsinn ableabie

anpn

tlialie di

int1

f ocantsi atedabed

fini 119d

4crapersapersclaperscr

CD

or

un

t eyp

s

1 12 inch

inch

m-d

se

il

bhe

cerandi cs

lied

snall

Page 113: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

edwell

B

Is

c

D

E F

G

dapdas bab9

gag9

105

v

SCRAPERS

A B C TYPE B E F TYPETIPE C

D TYPE D G H TYPE E

figure 15

eq

E

Page 114: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

106log

afipppSCRAPER TYPES

i3z

i

c3

3 9

325

2952104

102

Zx

273

X

310

ffi

313

W

301

X

277

X

323

X

321

X

27

0

X

J

X

X

11

X

X

00

X

X

X

distribution OF SCRAPERS

figure 16the overlap and cofigurationfigurationconfigurationco is forease of drawing

44UO

2743

274

2

30u

Page 115: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

716216

lthalth

beawheawy

1 r n

GROUP C figure 15 2 specimensapespe

lipticalellipticalT

camens

side scrapers made from flakesflafia planoconvexplanokesykesi singleconvex

flake scar sixteen possible specimens

length mean 1 316 inch range 1 14 to 1 18 inch

width mean l6la16 inch range 34 to 12 inch

GROUP D figurefigarefig 15ureare 11 specimen

single flake with small extension at one end similar to the

group I1 projectile points pressure flaked edges

length 1 78 inch

width 1 18 inch

GROUP E figure 15 3 specimens

end scrapers of planoconvexplano typeconvex comparatively large irregular

outline triangular cross sectionsec fronttiong cutting edge pressure

flaked

length mean 2 14 inch range 2 78 to 31 12 inch

width mean 1 532 inch range 1 12 to 34 inch

there are not enough of these artifacts to be ableabie to make a valid

statistical comparison but they do cluster into two large groups

these are A and E and B C and D the clustering includes both

known fremont sites and unknown campsites so there is no basis for

differentiation in that respect

knives jl11 specimens these artifacts are very similar to many of the

projectile points as they have haftinghatting shapes similar to notched points

but all are much too heavy for arrows and spears never seem to have been

a popular weapon many are similar to hatted knives from the southwest

and in the miscellaneous collections of the brigham young university

museum of ethnology and archaeclogyarchaeology

112

v 41 o0

JL

2

vh0 dt-ii

ab

figure

Page 116: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

KNIVES

A C TYPETIPEtibetybe A D G TYPEt1petape B

H TYPE E

figure I1

108

J

B

cA

E

G

D

F

17

Page 117: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

speciapeciI1 mens

GROUP A figurfigure I1 3 cj3ciicns

long lanceolate forms with rounded bases edges very harpsharp knives

from the southwest are basaly hatted twenty possible specimens

length mean 2 111611116illgilig inch range 3 38 to 2 14 inch

width mean 1 732 inch range 1 34 to 78 inch

GROUP B figure 17 5 specimens

long lanceolate with square bases pressure flaked surfaces

sharp edges appear to be basaly haftedchafted four possible specimens

length no unbroken specimens

width mean 1 332 inch range 1 316 to 1516 inch

GROUP C figure 18 2 specimens

triangular parallel notched knives usually percussion flaked

irregular edges fairly crude and made of quartzite or andasiteandesiteanda

length

siteno unbroken specimens

width mean 1 18 inch range 1 14 to 1 inch

GROUP D figure 18 1 specimen

triangular side notched with pressure flaked surfaces similar

to type H projectile point very thinthine

length 3 1316 inchincho

width 1 316 inch

GROUP E figure 17 1 specimen

triangular with opposing triangular base similar to type K

projectile point base broken

length 3 1316 to break

width 1 316 inch

again the statistical sample is too small to be of any use in

a distributional study

17 cl signsiigns

C

vidth

specimen

Page 118: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

110llolio

B

A

DE

C

F

H

I1 TYPETIPE A SCRAPERS

figure 18

KNIVES

Aaa B TYPE C

C TYPETIPEzype D

D

a9

Page 119: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

veeyeeape ayreryneryng

I1

ill

2

0IJ

1

Qjaj1

T

01

38

03

37102

323023

288

2

295

30

vpe 0s

X

x

x

x

x

x

tyeeTYPGTYPE rt T

3

x

x

x

x

x

tymmtyma c35

x

x

x

x

tyfttyf6tieg e

x

ryre 0a

X

distribution OF KNIVES

figure 19

0

177

32

29

Page 120: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

vav3 dth

112

drillsdrill 19 specimens the drills were confined to three main types which

fit also the categories outlined by ambler 1966 they are all made for

cutting or drilling of holes and many are highly specialized tools group

A are very well made and could have had only this one function

GROUPGROOP A figure 20 7 specimens

these are straight very round drills which have the appearance

of needles no bases evident

length mean 1 1364 inch range 1 12 to 78 inch

width mean 38 inch range 1 14 to 14 inch

this type is common in the southern provoprovos uinta san rafael and

sevier regions but few have been found in the provo lake area

they are known from hinckley many sites in the provo area have

been badly reported so this may be in error

GROUP B figure 20 10 specimensRecimeel

poorly

mensnens

shaped or well shaped expanding base drills often flatand little retouchedtouchedretoucherre flakes with one end sharpened into the

drilllength mean 1 38 inch range 1 34 to 1 inch

width mean 1316 inch range 1 14 to 1016 inch

this type is present in the sevier and uinta regions but are

much more common in the extreme east of the colorado plateau

they are known from intermediate sites in the dirtyurty devil river

area also it is rare in the provo area

s

11 2

Page 121: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

sssssA

w4f

JB C

tH

L

drillsBRILLS

A G TYPETIPE A

H P TYPEtitpetiepe B

Q R TIPETYPEtrpe C

FLAKER STONE S

figure 20

DF

G K

sy

pN 0

at

DR S

113

ssiss

11311.3

Page 122: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

000300ooo

38

lih114

mlwe

c

iz

z33

r

i

tii

282

304306

0

ac1c

2

n

e ssjsyv

X

y

r

2

x

tf A

X

X

X

X

X

type c

x

X

distribution OF DRILLS

figarefagfigpag 21ureare

TY PC

7

8 2

C

C ci

figure 2

Page 123: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

GROUP C figure 20 2 specimens

this type appears to be modified projectile points withirith side

notching expanded base thick and thin

length mean 1 716716711 inch range 2 to 78 inch

width mean 2332 inch range 78 to 916 inch

this group is reported from the sevier and san rafael areas

but only at six sites they are from west to east deep

creek beaver poplar knob 42em542em59 harris wash and turner

look ambler 1966 this type is rare in the vaiglevjholevaiole fremont

area

choppers 3 specimenspecimens these are classified under choppers due to

their large size and crude appearance materials analyzed from nephi

indicates smooth ground stone axes were popular and these were haftedhaftodhaftor

the choppers on the other hand are all percussion flaked and very ir-regular in outline all appear to be retouchedtouchedretoucherre cores there was onernecne

discoidal chopper from 42ut27542u1275 which is made of quartzite and is approx-

imately three inches in diameter the other two choppers are ellpticoeliptico

in shape and are 42ut28842u1288 314014oiw3 inches14 long by 2 18 inches wide

42u130642u306 3 12 inches long and 3 14 inches wide they are bothboun made

of agate

hammerstonesHammer 38stones specimens these appear to be specially made tool 5

as hammerstoneshammer ofstones similar type were recovered by deblooisdehlooiseeelooisdeeDeHEeEdeblee personalLoois

communication james mock from spotten cave and from the hinckley fanfastifasli

site also many similar stones are found in the brigham young univeralyUniveuniversuniverso

collections

i

they

ty

are generally made of quartzite or agate that has been

chipped into a roughly cubical or flattened polygonal shape manymarlymaily caucaacoucould

figure

wi dthath

in

rALy

knobs

caves

ryty

Page 124: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

CHOPPERS

A 42ut3o642ut306

B 42ut288

C 42ut2542ut275

figure 22

ilg1161.16

A B

c

Page 125: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

ii11

be called discoidal all show one edge which has been fractured infernally

from repeated blows oron something very hard these hammerstoneshammer havestones a

very consistent size averaging 3 ll6116ilglla inches across the largest diameterdiu

andarid

neterbeterteter

1 78 across the smallest the largest stone was 3 34 inches by

2 12 inches and the smallest 2 inches by 1 inch they all appear to be

designed for the palm of the hand

ground stone under this category are all pecked and ground stone artiirtiartl

facts such as manos metatesmetakesme stonetates balls and sinkers most of these

artifacts are broken into very small fragments so hiat identification of

types is literally impossible

metatesmetakesMe thesetates fragments were found at only fourteen sites and at only

six of these were manos found in association with them only two recoglecog

nzableszable types were recovered during the course of the survey and excava-

tion and no complete specimens were found at all one large utah type wa

found at 42ut328 as part of the foundation wall but it was too large to

haul away A photograph was taken of this particular artifact as itweighed about 60 pounds the utah type is typically found in the provoprove

aridandarld sevier regions and is present in the conger and san rafael regionrecrea

this

cdionlon

is the open end type with the flat grinding surface on theunevae upper end

another metate of the open end type was recovered from 42ut28442u1284 thisthiathid type

is more characteristic of the uinta region but is common throughout the

fremont area

five sites yielded fragments of flat metatesmetakes which are more character

isticcistic of the desert culture than the fremont all but two of the sltessites

were campsites of unknown cultural affiliation but the other sites terei

definitefinitedo fremont house clusters 42ut29 the campsites where the flat

ghentsgments

in

sm est

thatJ

frag

LL I1 p e was

i

s tes

n emonaemon41

realon

Page 126: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

comocomp miscellaneous

specimens

lete

at the end of the report

trountroug ins

carefcalef y

118

metate fragments were found are 42utlo242u1102 42ut291 and 42ut29542u1295 all of

these sites are on current creek

at three sites 42ut29542u1295 42ut31842u1318 and 42u131942ut3lg shallow trough

fragments were recovered which could have been either open end or utah

type metatesmetakesme thesetates fragments are very fragmentary and very broadlybroa

categorized

cIly

most of the fragments had been p reshapedre withshaped pecking

and smoothing so that the finished product would weigh less the

borders averaged about one inch in thickness and about a half an inch

deep

at three other sites 42u110242utlo29 42ut2342ut273 and 42ut3242ut327 deep

trough fragments were found which may have been parts of open end or

double open end metatesmetakesme thesetates also have been carefully shaped for use

these have a border thickness about 3 inch thick but with troughs as

deep as two inches all of the fragments seem to have come froin metatesmetakes

that would have been about one foot wide and two feet lonion

at three sites 42ut286942u1286 42u131542ut3l5 and 42ut3l642u1316 the fragments

were so small as to be unidentifiable or else the depth of the trough

could not be determined most of these fragments do however appear

to have come from deep trough metatesmetakes rather than the shallow type

almost all of the fragments were made from local igneous porphorporphir

ies basaltic glasses and sandstones there were many metatesmetakes collected

by the whitelwhiteiwhite family from 42ut29542u1295 and most of these were either of the

utah type or else were flat mrs whitesnhitels garden was lined with artifactsand a more complete discussion of her collection is under

34

C

i

pre

Page 127: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

lonion

lengieng debloois

19678182196781 it82 would appear that these are also of the one hand type

as they fit the hand with a little overlap

flat discoidal manos were as numerous as the loaf shaped ones

but came from only ten sites there were seven of this type represented

and all fall within the same size range with a variation averaging less

than one fourth of an inch

measurement AND distribution OF DISCOIDAL MANOS

site where found length width thickness

42utlo242u1102 4754.75 3.50350050 150

42ut295 425 3.25325 1.251255.00500 3753.75 1.751751754754.75 475 1.501501505.3755375 3.00300ooo000 2.00200200

42ur27942ur29 5.50550 3753.75 1.25125

42ut33242u1332 5.00500 3.50350050 1751.75

size variation 353 T tso

average size 5028 3.69369 1.55155

figure 23

119

manos of the surveyed sites yielded manos of one formfonncormcorn or another

these have been classified into several types by shape and size most

of the manos are fragments like the metatesmetakes and could not be measured for

statistical comparisons the main type found was the loaf shaped manoinanonano

which is fairly common in the provo sevier and san rafael areas this

type is represented by sixteen specimens from twelve sites there were

only four unbroken specimens two of these came from the woodard mound

and were 4 12 inches long 2 12 inches wide 2 inches high and 4 34inchesindies lonsions 1 12 inches wide 2 inches high respectively both of these

manos fall well under the 6.30630goo inch length established by deblooisdebDeH forLoois

his rocker bottom type of one hand manos as an average lengthpety th

le

335 .2525 .2020

1 tenty

125

125

wides

25 20

Page 128: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

edgeds one at 42ut325 is a triangular

mano somewhat similar to an isosceles triangle on its side this mano

measured 6 14 inches longiong 2 14 inches wide and 1 12 inches high

A vertical mano was found at 42ut28242u1282 which was 6 1813 inches lonion 1 12inches wide and 2 14 inches high this specimen has a rectangular cross

section both of these manos still fallfalifail within the range of being one

handed manos

all of the rest of the manos are fragments that could be identified

as to class but whose measurements could not be taken due to their frag-

mentary nature it would be of interest to make an etnographicethnographic study of

a people who use stone grinding tools and discover what the cause of the

great degree of breakage as many of the manos were made of very hard stone

which has been broken into fairly small fragments it does not appear to

have been accidental

stone balls these were recovered from two sites 42ut299 and 42m27342u1273

and are fairly common throughout the fremont area they have been reported

by gunnerson 1957 wormington 1955 taylor 1957 sharrock 1965

ambler 1966 and debloois 1967 these have been described as being

juggling balls or as part of the hidden ball game the hidden ballbail game

is described by cullin 190733533919071335339190733519071335 as339 a game where one hides a ball in

one of several places usually four the opponent guessing where it ishidden the implimentsimplements employed are 1 cane or wooden tubes or 2

moccasins the ball is hiddenhieden in the tubes or moccasins and bets are placed

120

the range falls slightly under the one handed type as illustrated

by debloois and would appear to be of a one handed type also but with a

much smaller range of variation

two other types are representrepresented

lonz

f

19579 19559 19579

b

wides

Page 129: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aliiWlotei ii

I1

dad9 eq

121

WTOwwwliifhu i lillie

ti

aoaq Bbab9 & C SINKERS19 C D E &

A

c

E

D

F SHAFSHAFT SMOOTHERSSMOTHERS

SINKERS AND SHAFT SMOOTHERSSMOTHERS

figure 24

T

Page 130: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

gratdratgreatgraat

ttltiidil jgglieggli C stonesstonerstoneb are usually in groups of three and arearl often

wateratarvater worn pebbles or stuffed leather balls they average a diameterdiadla ofol01rieternieter oneono

inch but rarierange up to three inches these are also part of a betting gamegaacganega

whereinhere

ac

much is wagered cullincollin 19077137141907713 seven714 raterwater worn pebbles were

recovered from the use area at the woodard mourd the balls recovered average

2 inches in diameter with a range of 2 12 inches to 1 12 inches

grooved stone balls or sinkers were recovered from 42ut29542u1295 itechiteohite farfarmfarn

wherethere they were quite common the two whole ones were both 2 inches in di-

ameter

d

andlidltditdP

L

have full diameter grooves these artifacts were presumably used

as fishing sinkers although it has been suggested that they were bola stonestonesstonel

as they have been found at otherodierodlerouier sites in groups of three tillsilastiastins is not diag-

nostic a bolas often have variableariabarbab numbersnule ofabers stones and veryverst often thoytheytho c0.0

placed

Y

in leather saekssackssackacksr eks ratherscks than grooved as they tear loose easily and

the time involved in grooving is lost herweerween the stones arearc lost nne gretpreponderate

C

ofpre fish bones alsoelsoaiso arguesarg forbiestiesbles fishingfisli netsing andard sinkerssin

shrift sr othuyot sevenheyhuY partialpartia or completeconpleteccmpletacompletaeonconeom objectsplete classifiedclascified ar As ftsiojirSioslo 3Jir lo10 recovered at 42u1273 on haft smoother of

4

sp

ricthinchrieth

clorioctorio

aldewldemearrli alidlaid 14 inchindi hishhighIUClushlus raswasvash found on thezuiezule curfccsurcurclr thfcc

jd va

rocroe

reksteks

eereen

beibel

amonaron algonquian

tribes

LD

the pl& o ersems point at their choice by pointing with

piidalid

diadla

morskors

sheftshaft

euideuld

doidolpoipol

plapta

fichfishin c

ondelonde i cj

on quickly the opponent can guess the place besides stone ballsballbailsbalibail sticks

belisbeiisbellsbebis or pebbledpebbleb can be used for the gaming piece count is kept with sticstior beansberns undand isir a game ortenofteneftenerten found where the social system is divided into

dual orzorcerz rlzations nieliellie moccasinnaoccasin version is commonly found amongarong

ijhpr

14

ii orfoff the peipienpei andpienplenrien it had a single groove doendown the ionglonglonz

axis anther surfacesurrace findfinirindrinerini wasI1 at 42ut338 whichah measuredichice 2 34 inches lor

1 34 inchezinches wide and 1 inch high this smoother was made of what appears

opp nen g

ss lelblr gamin v th L

co lmonlv

ro

i ataterar

i i

7

i

I1

C

tf e

L a

42 u27

ff n

42ut3 S 234A lattat

p-

layers

bs i

and

othey

mas

Page 131: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

etcxtcnrc

p3

i

I1

123113

41urio2vro2bunoshunos

VTPtto43lytx7&

ltvlt5 77

hownhvtnhvengrawralraiywtw2wir9s

w6

lmoimm

tadtod

235335

073uta

as6sC

irawras

etwowtwowinowingwuryffw79yatwdrwwrw

UTW ixut373 XJ

tr34ritr36

wtz07xut3 XJ7ju73w xw7j7jy

9273929223 73

aji ajxj17326

avtj37f iTVUT 623

ZO881887 vav7 3

I1 lu

z VIiny RZ

cac2 Z

F I1 Gv 111 k 15252 5

r3373y1

t

1

Xx

xS

X

T

SM

X

x

f

i0

XX

x

Xx

sqjmjJXJtx

0S

j

X

xXfisi r

j

d

1

j

X

x

t

pxq

t

h10 j

x

11

htgaig5iL

X

t

1

1

x

i

1 J

I1

X

i

f

i

i

i

i1

i

4 k

1

v

I1

k

1

i

1

ajxj

i

t

i

X

1

0 tt s

axjx xX

X1

tn

ftgrt

3

aa4a teanteun7

V rd 744 vrvR

W 17

faf211-

792 YTq

2v730tv P

ot3ooteo

P

wc1731641 nv737 3

L4 advavvavi 103494 9

ay

wirbswa

araw

yata

uta

ajwoj

aq

arv

Page 132: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

wideywidel nalincli hij l

and was made of cinder also the association with the use area supports tle

differentiation by use within thehe site

worked bone the most common worked bone artifacts are awls allaliail of 1he

bone except for the bone knife recovered from 42u129342ut2q came from the excav-

ation at the woodard moundmoundoboundo the bone therefore will be analyzed in fcenns

of the use area and structure in a manner very similar to that used on the

ceramics the preponderance of bone tools that suggest much work withvith

animal skins also suggests the dependence on wild game as well as agriculagrical

ture and that the fremont economy was very much a subsistence situation bip

subsistence in the sense that the agents of production and consumption wee

most probably the same individual

1

to be an ore of04 copper it also had a single groove down the long axis

but was much more finished than the rest of the shaft smoothers recovered

the other five smoothers came from the woodard mound one of thosethese cainecalnecalno

from the surface and had the end broken off but measured 1 14 inches widowidevido

and 12 inch high three of the smoothers came from close association

with the use area and all were broken twono of them were 1 12 inches wide

and 1 inch to 3 inhinch high respectively the second shaft smoothersmooth had

two grooves one on each side the other smoother from the use area

measured 1 34 inches wide and 1 inch high this specimen had two grooves

alsoaisoalsos one on each side and down the long axis all of the specimens from

the useareaeareaus were made of cinder the last smoother was found in hethe back

hoe trench and measured 1 12 inches longlongiiong JU34 inch wide and 3 ch

34

34

11

0

in

irillah

tarlieutlieux1.1

fremont bi

cr

tor

ahe

3.3

Page 133: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

ellalleli

hidnidaldI1I1

eargar

handiehenele

wriurlethith

aidi4idi

figiifigini le

5

awlskaarisrris theses are the most common bone implimentsimplements andarid are of three general

classes the 196661966671966 67 brigham6 yound university field class recovered c ny

bone awisawlsaels from the hinckley site 42utllo42utilo which fit these same threethroethre catcaic

egoriegeaorieoeg thealeoheeleoriesorieGorles first category has the joint of articulation for a handlehandie

the

co

second has the joint split and ground to makemjem aJ handlehendlehandiehee andnd thele hldareciretire splinterssp- i thate have been broken fromfron longlonalonoiono bones these classes aebirdiasimilarsirdia to the types setsel up by gunnerson 1957 and de blooishlooisbloods 1971

none

0

of the awlsawisavis recovered from the woodardbodardI moundhound were whoiewhole so the at

edoriesegories established here are a little broader

GROUP A figure 2526 5 specimens

these are long rounded and highly polished tips of what appear

to be deer or antelope metapoidals none of them appear to be

splinters as they are very thick with very little cancellouscancelloubcancel

tissue

iousloublous

length 11 broken 5 range 3 12 to 1 inch

dui alisllallablabi broken rangeange 12 to 14 inch

GROUP B figure 26 212 specimensspecimens

these are short flat fragments that are not well polisher to y

ezr to be tips of bison or deer long bonesdones as they show muh

cancellousmioellousc tissue and have slightly curved cross section they

may have been made from bison ribs

length all broken range 1 12 to 1 34 inches

wiclth all broken range 3 inc maximummanmaa

teotwotvo

mum

typetypcyp A were associated with the use area and they both came

fromfron the elowerlower level just above the floor of the depression in

square one the other three awls type A were associated with the

structurestructstract twouregareg of them found just above the floor of the house

awIs

i

frorironi

1 J

ego wieriegie

me adoidals

1112

poli isiccificc

11 40 31

aa1a r Alth

e

ri th depr ssionassionf

y

uny

dul

nuh

cann ellous

s sue

alth

Page 134: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1I1

I1 A

I1

I1

I1 TYPE A

J TYPE 13

figure 26

Arar1w

D EB

A

Q11nI1I1

F G

BONE AWLS AND FLAKERS

AWLS

A E TYPE A

F G TYPE B

FLAKERS

H

126

c

A

NJ

H

Page 135: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

efieyl

17

one flat awl was found in the upper level of square five and the

other one came from the back hoe trenchtrenche most of the awls then were

associated with the structure

flamersflakersflalcersFl thisakers type of artifact is represented by two types they do not

appear to be punches as the tips are too broad and are heavily scarred from

use

GROUP1jroup A figure 2 3 specimens

this type is chisellikechisel inlike configuration and appears to have been

quite short it is very heavy and wide

length 1 58 inches two broken specimens are 1 38 anduad 1 12 inches

width 58 inch two broken specimens are 9l6916gig and 12 inch wide

GROUP B figure 26 3 specimensmeclMeci

this

mens

type is rounded and fairly heavy it appears to have been made

from heavy bison bone fragments

length all broken range 3 12 to 1 18 inches

width all broken range 58 to 14 inch

all of the flakersflamers come from the use area and all but one were in clos

association with the floor of the depression the odd one came from level one

of square one the evidenceeri seemsdence to indicate that the awls were used within

theia sls l1la11 V wh t kers weretere used in the use area this indicates that

the skins were handled inside while the stone tools erewere manufactured outside

the numbers of projectile points would seem to support this hypothesis

bone and shell beads 10 specimens seven of the prehistoric beads and

one historic glass bead came from the woodard mound one olivella sp bead

came from 42ut32642u1326 in kimball creek canyon and was of the mussel shell type

7

27

3

lfigure

14 cers uyere

aad

Page 136: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

aisalqals smoothed

edges often rounded edges

length mean 18 inch range 532 to 18 inch

width mean 3l6316olg016 inch range 14 to 5l6516 inch

GROUP C figure 2 1 specimen

olivella bead of unknown species top removed for stringingstrin slightgingg

bluish tinge but bleached rare in fremont

length 12 inch

width 14 inch

GROUP D figure 221271 2 specimens

perforated shell disks very thin one very curved surfacesurfac the other

slightly curved

outside diameter mean l6la16 inch range 38 to 12 inch

inside diameter mean 532 inch ranaran3 732 to ll6116lla inch

the beads were divided evenly between structurestrue andture use area three

being found in each area none of the beads had any decorations

which are common farther north at the hinckley site the glass

bead is discussed under miscellaneous artifacts

lureinreaure

716pig

sas2ecimenaimen s

boneaboneq discoidaldiscoid

3

GROUP A figure 2 31 specimens

lonslonglon tubularla bone beads made from bird bones highly polished ends

rounded by grinding

length mean 2732 inch range 1 9l6916gig to l6la16 inch

width mean 3l6316olg016 inch range 14 to 532 inch

GROUP 3 figure 2 3 specimens

small washer like beads made from bird bone

fiure 271

716

27

27

27

ran

eg

Page 137: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

dad9 Es gag9 TYPETIPE B

TYPE C

TYPETIPE D

TIPE E

GAMING PIECES

J K TPETYPE AL M N 0 P Q TYPE B

R S TYPE C

figure 2

rar9

TOA

b li lyhD E F S

H

BEADS AND GAMING PIECES

TYPE A

129

C

G

l0

1 1

P

m N 0L

L

minMIDR

BEADS

ap bab9 C

G

H

19 mam9 aqnq 09 aqpq

27

byh

Page 138: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

130ijoico

bone gaininggaming pieces these are somewhat common objects in the provo area

but are much more common in the southwestern sevier and uinta regions

there are four characteristic types outlined by ambler 1966 and his

system was followed somewhat

GROUP A figure 27 2 specimens

these are square bone gaming pieces which are fairly thick undec-

orated bone scars on bottom side

length mean 1 inch range same

width mean 1116 inch range 34 to 58 inch

GROUP B figure 2 6 specimens

rectangular bone pieces thin undecorated show bone scars on lower

side

length mean 2 ll6116ilglla inch range 3 12 to 1 14 inch

widthnidtheidth mean 1532 inch range 9l6916gig to 38 inch

GROUP C figure 2 2 specimens

rectangularrectanaular decorated gaming pieces incising and punctuate in designs

similar to dominos

length mean 1 58 inch range 1 34 to 112 inch

width mean 38 inch range same

these gaming pieces are for a gamlingcamling game in which number is deter-

mined by throwing of dice such games are found among 130 tribes of 30

linguistic stocks there are two essentials the dice and counters for the

game the dice have two faces distinguished by color or markings some of

the plain dice have traces of red ochreachre on the bottom side they are either

thrownth byrojin hand or in bowls or baskets there are many varitiesparitiesvari inties counting

but the idea is to gain all the counters thus ending the game in general

such games are commualcoimnualcommunalcoimcolm affairsnual on a dual organization basis culin 1901907igo

pennsmenns

greare

opecppec

i 10

C

4re ensfig hecimmecim

fi re 27

27

0 co

rovin

Page 139: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1 ne

131

unfired clay objects the only objects recovered in this class are

figurines and one fragment of what appears to be a clay coil all of

these objects came from the woodard mound

figurineFiR Aurine A slate figurine which has the appearance of an arrowhead

when observed from the rear this figurine is carved and

incised slate and therefore is very unusual it is in-

cluded here due to its pertinence to the rest of the fig-

urines it has two incised horizontally incised lines

across the lower body and three across the shouldersoshouldersshoul twoderso

upward projections like tangs appear to be nubbin arms

the mouth and eyes are incised and the nose holes are

drilled the overall shape is the basic triangular figure

seen on fremont rockartrock thisart figurine was found in

square two level I1 use area association

figurine B partial head with coffee bean applique eye that has a cen-

tral punctate hair is carved on the side of the head

and the nose is of the pinched bridge type no nostril

holes are in evidence

figurinefiguribiguri C head only of figurine and is triangular in shape the nose

is of the pinched bridge type without nostrils the mouth

is punctate and it also has carved hair but on both sides

there appears to have been applique eyes at one time but

they were broken off

bigurifigurinefiguri D top of head with only the right eye remaining which is an

applique pellet with a central punctate the nose is

pinched without nostril holes

f ig

fijzuriI1 ne

ne

Page 140: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

u

I1

amxm

132

A

ri

Vhi

1 i1

vV

H

J

x

yA

rJ

r1fym

7

i

1

yEK

FIGURINES

ALL LETTERS correspond TO TEXT

figure 28

B

D E

C

F

G

ia

Page 141: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

bereherclemelemo the stick was pushed ratherrauler kan drawnoiciwndi

the

awn

nose is slightly pinched

figurine F basically triangular shaped head with a pinched nose therechere

are nostril holes with a punctuate mouth the eyes are pun-

ctate otherwise the head is undecorated

figurine G flaring base of a figurine with no decoration or elaboration

of form typical flattened cylinder

figurine H central portion of a badly eroded and broken figurine which

appears to have had the right shoulder twisted about 10

degrees towards the front it is very flat with no evidence

of decoration

figurine I1 central portion of body of what appears to be a seated fig-

urine nubbin legs protrude from the base at right angles

to tevietie figure which is very cylindrical there is nor dec

oration on the body

figurine J strange Y shaped piece of clay which looks like deerdoer antlersanglers

for a zoomorphiczoor figurinemorphic this object is 58 inch high

and at its widest point is 78 inch several small straight

objects very similar to this were accidentally destroyed

during the excavation

agmentfragmentadment K undecorated long piece of clay which has no distinguishing

features it does not seem to be a figurine fragment but

may rather be a piece of rolled clay from the coil pottery

making process

the only complete figurine A had the typical shoulders found on

provo figurines at the hinckley farm it should be mentioned that the

aionlionalon

shosharsfigurine E upper one fourth of a head with a slash eye shich shcrs sr io11

inner seriations

s

i iere

figuriI1 ne

L

fr

ur-ine

Fi

ora 16

han

Page 142: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

enefeene

ammAIMhin qhsc10

I1

2v

uruuku

peiepi

134

t&

ukftt

14

04

i

1

11

0IS

0

0 s

15

03

10 hllhliahlihig

&ltj

lk14

distribution

v

OF FIGURINES

0

PROVO

o

7I11

4B

1

0

7

07

0

ltI1

JJ

1

neTRAITS

tonefoneNONEtongnong5oudfev3ssiculsjcul

prfetPR

ftfrFt

feT

elfteL

fRfsft s

PP

HGH06coftty

toopinchplnchpanch 0

PUCTPT N 0

SLHppt VS

onctfttc y

SVYA

poncthtg0oncthtcoad10PADond urUT

SH

ifttsift

S

TS

e ys

cl faf0

note contrast in numbers

H ewaREAeweurz RL tehTRHtem ITS

G

P recz nan7

C V on R

L L C LA CWWC

F t N

C C 0 tz aarlaart omioricri

osc

QE

C C U NCT ATC C

R

4

A Is

f C 11 Tr ra Ms

ca

2 t Z IAI I1A

L

k

DC

14

ngh

skya

wut

ifa

ta

arfet

ftfe

alft

bftts

al

as

appt

Page 143: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

laalannaa theuiediedle hinckley ones but this is only natural cs icpliIc hihpli

is predominately sevier oriented is connected ithwithkithu goshen valley by

currentcarren4z creek theoheone goshen figurines do however seem to lo10 bicullybithetle

cullycally

provoprove type this in turn indicates that the doundryboundryundryfoundryDo bwnprovoprove

the

and sevier areas lies along long ridge and is of a liu

beslbellbeid aeon

florcflonc

hiihllaih

I1

ostantialifostiuitial

nau e cs sites only a few miles apart ar3ar5ara statisticallystatistical quite1y differ-

ent this maynay also indicate a substantial time difference between ti

eece it 19

oneona

natnal uralururai aa

nawnal u

essesq on the other hanchndand are

predo iicd itly non shouldered with himhigh area body decoratidecordtindecolatidecoradecord scivehcivetinmore body punctate noses applique eyes and breasts than the proeeproveprovo

figurinfigurines

the goshen figurines seem to have more of the sevier characterchiracteriracterzch

istlsisticsistas thanzhant

cioritiori

13

recyit 19667196 field67 class at the hinckley mound 42utll342utlld recovered 14

more fragments of figurines which increases the known number from that

site to 34 with the additional information on the sevier figurines

providedprodded by de blooisaloois 19771771957717719771195771 who77 analyzed the foote collection

from nephi a statistical comparison could be made to place the

goshen figurines within the provo subareasub thearea goshen figurines

harehavehane r ndencypudency towardstw shoulderslouldersgslards applique and1 slash eyes pinched

noses elaborate or plain bases punctate mouths and presence of

hair

fron the data on the trait distributions chart of the provprovobrov

sevier areas on can see at a glance that thetine provo figurlric1gurirx ceare

characteristically shouldered with decoration found on the low areaacea

of th3tnraanra body have pinched noses have slash and appliqueapplique1appliques eyes1 andwidmid

have very few breasts the sevier figurinesfigurin

florescence of the two subdivisionssub itdivisions naymayway also indicate toritrltoritritrltsi

7

ne s

coile

A

gos ien

f

11

o0

4 t

conce

s

ss

ostanttalialtai

rl

c on

licu

figura

len

neon

cence

awn

ay

Page 144: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

ahlezablezabahie sinssiens of0 wear from hatting inside a hiewhlewblew bulbut

speciaspecia1specialspecian care beyond being collected and placed together in

mellrelimeil dlogiodio

itesliesaies

arbeybeye

hayhatazy

aysayqalq theitheathe figurfiguralAL e

I1t i rs I1

rihrib

tritrl barbharbparlo sticks out at a 30 decreedegree angieingleangleang andle is 3 6

secseooientarysedentaryoien linagetary lysecysedyse

th

j

ithichizhi E jiesj rajtrjte eces opposect thtunatanat the fjnontfroanonlfinont werek of a seiientai uo

j-

hc

gosepose

tomithe fi gurine s

boibol P 1

11

zabiezahie

laielale do siiSlisildilooi universal clctrllontbont

keaker

manmcn Us spasp3spy

haftinhafkin

caccicacli altsplts were filled with decayed garbagegarbagbarbag usually flfiutah lake itletheitietyle associationssciationsalsociations seeiseemseenseel paradoxicalparai

miseiselsyiisce

domicaldorical

cohlcollcehicinus specimens one bone harpoon point came fronfromfroimfroin bhothounebheuno LJC

speciapeci n

differences of cia sine people such as occurs in

rocur

in gencrzl cy

lhrlhout lechocheeho fi qiontinont area but there are regional variation iefanellonfanllonranfanrun fLlonlionliol bhethe figurinesfigurinejfigurin i still in doubt as they in a feefewcee case

appear to have beenbenueen dolls rather than of a religionsreligio significssignificcsignific ccrcc

it ic known that atimalwdmai shapes were anadeinade as a zoomorphic flarineflurineflwas

urine

foundsound byb the 196661966 field6 class that some figurines from the

hinkley siteolte were placed on clay plugs matheny personcjpersonpersoncpersona coroiiunicali r

and that nie f tlle figurines ara made of stone vaichwhichIi lehichieh is a tedio

prprocessprocesoicess thetaetagohe associations have not been with any kind of specialize

cereinoniaceremonialremonialcere rtytresinonia nor have the figurines sho jnelmedm any high crb

jn square tuotwo of the tdoodardwod&rd plo116fiohoundind see figure 30 the hzy

single barbbcrb 2ieuilrd theuieule way dovmdoamdovdoi them shaftshafshact1.1 cliecilethe shaftsha is 3 7 lclacl j

lonion canhicluicll1 141 inch14 in diameter it taperstemperstampers to a point in the reareadreat

thertherbthei 3 are csidrablelcr3

an inelinhinclknel lnlobjectsobject of a simllarciniilarsimulargirlcini typeilar have been reported fron the freinont9 butlut thythe

are veryreily rrULone bone knifelikeknife objectlike cecx fromfronfrone 42u125342M it2n appears to bj

ex binbir ribrhu which has beonbeen worked dow to a fine pylntpyant it ke2

differelirices

j t t c

2 aC

1

tllaere 11 e

U IL 0n 1 s ti11 in doabubt a s taht1hey in fevr ca se

s

lc

19 667

hin klley 0

he

specjl jiaji2 e 1

ce f

VL 1

1 armoorarpoorarpoonpoor

t e

ft 7 nlb r one hird 1 eC

ho low

ma L of la10

s freir ont

z bi s r- r1b uhlwhiich h 0 s bee ii vov ro kec d0w 1 t0 fine int

ro cUr

ej

cj

1

h r

zoonoymoy r h

6 67

cache piepilipitpiti

these

C

i to

czin sid

rie

loc

662

kte

retoy

olen

hocur

animal

beligio fcc

alley

an

Page 145: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

137107102

A

B

MISC ANEOUSmiscellaneous SPECIMENS

A HARPOON

B KNIFE

C STONE SQUARE

figure 30

Page 146: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

bitbut ha

historichictor artifacts were excavated in the upper levels of the

woodard mund in the process of digging the test picpis these objelswere confinedronfinedronftneinonronnen to4fined square1 nlljo0 bits of leatherleatharle cartridgesaldier and gla5oglado

none of thetllethle maleriamaterialsmateria seem to be prehistoricprepro materialshistoric

I1I1

surrsurfaceacs

round

pipil C t objejobje

calleccollec 41

lliedallied

approampro c

di ly row of likelikoilkeilko drilled holsholeshoishoies just above the breed

it lo10 iottijtt ilensilhns long to the break and 78 inch tridewideiride the surracesurface lb

ground bt n polichedpolishedpoli seeched figure 30

fc

a gisgibgins bead whirhwhlhwhich is sirnellarsimilarsirellarrellar to glass trade beads of the plainsplairs andcdmountain ameaareasarea the bead is ll6116ilglla inch in diameter and is bright redzedvedleehed

the 4mound tcould have ben used by prehistoricpre orhistoric historic utesules withwi veitewhitevelte

trade items

photographs were taken of two collections from goshen the1 mostnoste

pertinentPer collectionlecloncotinant was that of mrs G T white who collected f r

4281245 her collection contained about 200 projectile points of all

typstypitapit fifteenyp369 kalvesknlvesklikiikia seven sinkersinkers twenty or so mmosamos sevrlsev

metatesmeratesmetakesme

nral

onetatesrates tonestone axea severalxe pendantspendantsqpennantspend andants three stone disks with

centrally drilled holes the nostmost interesting part of the colletioncollationwere cyrefirecype pointspoinc widlwilhwidiwich long parallel flaking angostura like forms

these pointspoind are very long and well made one smaller one looks iiilIiboto

ila folsom type

the etherother collection was that of ned okelburryokelberryOkel whoburry collectcollects from

around the lakelaka as wellvrellweil as the valley the collection contained approx-

imately 400 points 100 knives and about 15 drills all of the materialsdiate

appear

rialsto be Fremonfremont or later his collection was not typed nor was

any provenienceprovenprover maintaineddeneedence

punctate bre

s az ht

not

c

s

na 11 gl s6

except

z

JI1 lecloncion ed

L ia3 o zmanoss0

dr colle tionaionalonmion

f v e

s

photog-raphs

s

fc

bi t

s

si

s

axes

searl

icil

sa

declon

iab

Page 147: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

139

one square stone 2 inches by 2 14 inches by 2 inches was

found at 42ut30642ut3o6 a house cluster at genola and of unknown function

this artifact is very similar to one reported by debloois 196784

he speculated a relationship with the stone balls but this seems

doubtful

one stone disk was found at 42ut299 a hunting camp on upper

current creek 6 inches along the long axis 4 34 inches along the

short axis and 12 inch thick this may have been a palette for

grinding pigments the edges are percussion flaked and slightly

rounded by grinding its function is unknown

Page 148: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1

ticrtkr irrigationirrigatio tacht3cht ichesicuesachicues which are found farfarl

I1

I1

ondersoreersoneers

the calpstcaLcalestpstdiclicdie

tectionotection to camptecotec liontionlloneieele hiyeheye

quizguli

lisils

andalandai

lriini

tiertiar

ac1c

caitscnits

140

CHAPTER EIGHT

discussion

jgjt lenient pattern it could be said that the majority of the sites are

close association with a source of running water all of the fremont

hochourhous lustersclusters are along creek drainages 9 next to constant springs or

M i to flood plains of creeks this indicate rather rigid choice

of ridencejidencemidenceri whichdence is dependent upon a good werwaer source as it is re-

quite for horticulture this stress also iricitirdlicaltriricit that structures

werwere onlyjnly built wherewheye water was available therlihcrtth recrlcruerl many fremont camp-

s C

south site 42ut293

t i ie wolf farfare haa large flat area arossacossaboss t reek which could be

with sirila ii rigation and whwhi appe to be used in this

r today the lard mound and 42llt33842it338 ar 1 thithichyth on the floodlood plainplapia

f

in

1jrrentirren crekcreek wbobii h1 wasi recordedrecordejrecordelcordelrecorre adeideJ being b j ike in the winter arf

prgT byr theng narlaarlarly p

unknown affilaffiliaffidiaffail clontionllon are f nd wherever the hlr good or elcelf hirehi there dunesduner c fer naturinaturnaceynalcynatura

As mentloncj ore the size f structustruc tu and the clusterinclusteriiclusterclustering

f sn Lic curestures into its of three cocc five houseshouse t a site indicatindican

thacthat villagetillage itustcri weretuat rarec heyaheyai appear t have exploited

T

set tle abentaent

a

r

2397ins

0 cr elleluelgs

evCI

t

tl

sub h

f

t 1 ar 2

ariy1

y naturl i

ment fonejrfonej ore

CA S t 1 11

hz t

a l1 la c

n-

d or allaliail of it anialcinal resourcesresource more e

l-

ly the lake

i-

id

ii

c

ji

1

239

oze

ilyily

1119

anly

arg

midence

lection

7617617o76.1fi r is indicate the emphasis on hunting r el the transitory nature

I1 c mpsamps while rnoinglaoiao toillg new locations

the village sitessilssltes were all located in ayeaarea here4herechere subsurfacesub

iriirllrisurface

rationoptiontation occuroccur1occurs ratrsllytatrat andrallyraily there is no e 1 ce for canals or

23923.92397 in comparison to the sites of unlnoaunkn3 affiliations 76170

Page 149: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

141

fish while practicing limited horticulture As pointed out by green

19647980196479 utah80 lake appears to have been the center for the popula-

tion of the provo subareasub andarea that sites along great salt lake are

peripheral to utah lake this survey increased the known sites in utah

county to 338 of which a great number are of fremont affiliation the

settlement intensity alone would tend to support this conclusionconclusionoconclusions other

considerations are the ecological setting of utah lake in the area west

of the wasatch front it is the only major body of fresh water and has

perineal streams feeding it the lake abounded with trout and suckers

in aboriginal times not to mention the abundance of game birds and deer

the wasatch front just a few miles away has abundant game and wild

fruits and berries goshen valley and tinticgintic mountains are a major

source of agate chert etc available for tools cedar valley west

of the lake and near goshen has abundant pinon trees which could be

harvested every few years

so far only a very small portion of the better house and campsite

areas have been surveyed in utah county there are still vast areas

along the spanish fork river hobble creek santaquinSan canyontaquin jordan

river and lake flats that are untouched no survey has been made of

the peripheral areas of the lake bottoms which has indications of yield-

ing aastevaste numbers of sites most of them are probably late ute but there

should be many fremontfremFrer sitesmontoont there too cedar valley is untouched and

should contain much historic ute material

it would appear that the large sites in goshen valley are late

in that all of them contain some foreign trade wares which appear to be

of anasazi derivation I1 would place these sites around 1050 to 1150

AD due to their ceramic indicators alone

80utah

Page 150: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

iviivivl

anelanalanetlysismysis

chicchie

6282

mokeok

innind iuded

baolao

pottenotte ry froirol

sicsisllslu ttenatenc

wiowic r

idt105

uranurkn

crlic indicators of the sites surveyedsurvey thirtyedg three confined p ttyth ce ofcf these were village sites 102loz 2792279 and

27522927527927522799

338333308303033

2822829

eighteen

2862861

werwetwerg

2932939

9 hru

2972979clust 299rj 3003009ooo0009 301 3063069006 30307 30309s 3

32 328 3333339303 and

2809.2809

336 one was a cave site 104 and elevensievenglevensleven yet p w27 2802809 281 284 2852859 288288t 2942949 296 298298y 329129 and 337 the eavcvccuccuscac le

ivt included in the comparisons as different criteria verewere used iii 4

analysisailaaziaariarnic mocklysis personal communication

breaking the data down into four main areas within gshrgahrgash valleyvaileyvaldey

A

r

ivr tieuhe bellowingfellowingfel informationlowing

KIMBALL CREEK UPPER CURRENT CREEK

161 provoprove 343233234 75032 provoprove306 sevier 6524 376 seersevierseeler 295129.51

1 iviebriedriedrleielelele creek .2121 142 saltsait lake nlnnl51 unknown .2121 1 tenperlecs 03

7 999799985s 5 unknown 31 10000

LOWER CURRENT CREEK

837 provo 6147274 sevier 2012620.126 GENOLA

159 salt lake 116711.6718 uinta 1.32132 9893 provo 2 9.9

53 1 creek 3893e89s3.89 31 sevieseviersevle 626.216 temperless 117lel71.17lela 249 stsalt lake os

7 unknown .5151 3 9a9djsijs 100i417oo14

As would be expected salt lake gray is more common in thetho C

santacuinsantquinSantSanta

i

passcuinquin

1

joins

ar

utah valley theche veryverry highhilgh psrcrt S3 cf slhiieliiediledale is due primarily to the analysis done by kokyaoylomao encnk the pottery from

spottensprtten cave and his criteria are different theoheone single site I1 clas ifidbifid

rj ganolagcnola showed the following 42 provoprove 41 seviersovie and 17 salt lalolaiothis irdcatesird thatcates there is a much greater percentage of salt lake grajgray

th s rrjgion but alsosisoaiso a much greater percentage of seviersevien gray

Yc l ned1 t

Y 7.7

2

2849 L

S 1

withhi

V 7

3al

im100 00

etempel less

373170014

c nunon

oins

c as1s

421

percent ge gra 7 1

re glohgiongich se neraer G ay finli t

fibtc grem lands the percentage circled on figure 32 are the fiihrfiizrekr uljij0

99 97

I

y

thy

thee

moek

tle

2121

51 gag

bield

loo

389117

ind

arlic

aal

bac

201220.12

Page 151: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

CERAMIC BEARING SITES IN THE VALLEY

scales exageratedexaggeratedexa

figure

gerated

31

143

Page 152: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

elinKlinekinballbalibail

crekciekbiek5

all other types

T

lo10

lo10 vie r0

I1

CERAMICERAMIC distributions WITHIN THE VALLEY by types

figure 32

I1

gif611a ge- a

27 8414244

carrentcurrent

gloagaoa

klimballklinball

gebalagejala617

1

kaeyiciey

144

lowerdowerdovercurrentcreek 61

upphci

prosprovprovs type

icleyk1ey hinckley24

Y a

gioa2j

55

genola1 CQJ

65 uporupwr area29

5

sevier9

type

35

hinckley hinckley35 4

N N

lower

a

owerrrentarentcreekreek12

cergurent

salt lake ttetype

j1

i

lowercurrent

1

1

creek7

vyy

genolaabsent

kimballcrocrtc v uppery5 current

v I1

r

H1

C I1

erar

2

rY ent

rent m allaliuppeuppulphappe oae

mb6 rCz up

current

G la ab sent0

U ranren5creek creek

5.5 rentcnek

tA

THE V EY

creeks11

rene

aj

ya

Page 153: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

ardsands ki creek which

is a pass directly into the sevier river regionregione As could be expected nephi

influenced upper current creek less than did the sevier river on kimball

creek but the influence from nephi is noticablenoticeablenoti incable that there is a 9

increase in upper current creek over lower current creek the sevier type

is more common in genola and at hinckley 35 as the nephi influence seems

to have channeled down through santaquinSan andtaquin into utah valley easier than

into goshen

provo gray has its greatest distribution along the current creek

drainage and I1 believe its greatest distribution within the provo area

it would appear that this type is native to the goshen valley region and

spread towards the city of provo through santaquinSan passtaquin towards nephi

through current creek and santaquinSan andtaquin into the sevier river region

through kimball creek canyon

the analysis of ceramics from the woodard mound indicated that there

was a strong lateral differentiation within the site by use but that itwas vertically stable through time this has a bearing on chronological

interpretations of the surveyed sitessltes as it is for this reason that I1 have

placed a personal interpretation on dating the house clusters and campsites

the projectile points were just as expected from the trait distributions

outlined by ambler the points also showed the same lateral differentiation

but with greater vertical differences it is interesting to note that

goshen has a very high percentage of flat metatesmetakes and discoiddiscoidatdiscoidaldisco manosleal

and this trait should be analysedanalyser as ambler did in his dissertation it may

be that goshen valley is not only the center of provo gray but is the

distribution point for the flat metate trait

145

the mock analysis modified slightly to fit my criteria at the hinckley

site in provo the percentage is up to 35 gil sen 196919670

the sevier ceramics are heavily weighted towards K iballlnballleball

gilsen

to

cr

goshen

goshen

vertic y

sitesq

lo-v

at

gli

Page 154: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

tlenetieno

1

relationships ambler 1966 divided the fremont up into five malnmainnain sub-

areas on thefrieurieurle basis of trait distributions which centered on the following

areas uinta basis san rafael swell sevier riversriver conger range and the

provo salt lake region these he named respectively the uinta san rafael

seflersevier conger and provo areas the basis for this was an analysis by

frequency distributions of 114 traits the provosevierProvo seperationseverationsepeSevier wasration

tentative as they shared numerous traits and there seemed to be little to

differentiate them the provo was suggested by jones 1961 and elaborated

by green 1964 on the basis of traits figurine stylesstyless and the unique

environmental setting of the valleys much of the differentiation used

to lie in the promontory influence but recent evidence indicates that

even without the late promontory thrust the provo is still differentiated

from the sevier and is centered on utah valley the goshen survey indicates

a closer affiliation of utah valley with the sevier region than does goshen

but that goshen and utah valley are more closely affiliated than eitherelther are

to the sevier region the boundryboondry between the provo and sevier regions

seems to lie along long ridgeridgel from santaquinSan totaquin the east range of the

gintictintic mountains how this border swings to the west has yet to be estab-

lished the provo region appears to have a fairly concrete territorialityterritorialitterritorialityas sites seperatedseparatedsepe byrated only a few miles show sudden trait changes which fitrivrittheir respective areas rather than blend

the ceramic taxanomictaxonomictax systemanomic has been modified somewhat by debloisdebloois

and in order that new ideas could be checked and evaluated in the context

of survey work we each had slightly different criteria and our final

analysis differed because of this

relation

he

fre 1ienojeneleno y

territorial itky

Page 155: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

V

the experience at the woodard mound created the need for careful

reporting of excavated materials it would appear that dating fremont siteson the basis of trait distributions is a complex and possibly impossible

job radiocarbonradio datescarbon are needed in much larger numbers than now avail-

able so that relationships can be solidified

in a general way the importance of goshen valley to the under-

standing of the role of the provo area has been demonstrated in this

paper the survey has also pointed out the need for exploration of the

surrounding areas so that a comprehensive interpretation of the data

could be made the area between the city of provo and santaquinSan canyontaquin

should be surveyed for ceramic indicators the kimball creek region should

be followed up with a survey through the canyon to the sevier river so that

a line of sites could be established and ceramics studied in this wayways the

link between goshen and the borders of the provosevierProvo regionsSevier could be

established there are many more sites in goshen as jay woodard saw me

after I1 had cut the survey off and described several more including a

village complex these sites should be recorded and their relationships

to what has been discussed evaluated to test if the data from the valley

is consistent

goshen

mores

Page 156: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

148insibsibb

bibliographyLIOGRAPHY

aikens co melvin1965 excavations in southwest utahoutahitaho university of utah anth

ropoloicallopoloalcalropolo papersical no 76076 salt lake city

1966a plains relationships of the fremont culture paperpresented at the annual meeting of the society for americanarchaeologyarehaeologyo reno nevada

1966b excavations at snake rock central utahoutahitaho MSmsoms9 department ofanthropology university of utah salt lake cltyocltycleyoalty

1967 plains relationships of the fremont culture A hypothesisamerican antiquity vol 32 noo 2

ambler jo richard1966a caldwell village and fremont prehistory MS doctoral disser-

tation university of coloradoocoloradosColocoio boulderradoo

andersonandersons keith M

1963 ceramic dues to pueblo puebloid relationshiprelationships so americanantiquityantaauity volovolvoi 28 no 3 ppoppapoap 303307303300303330303 30o307300 salt lake city

baldwin gordon co

1950 the pottery of the southern paiute american antiquityvolovolvoi 16 no 1 ppap 505650 salt56 lake cityocitycilyo

berge dale1964 an archaeological survey of white valley millard county

utzutahoutaitaho MAmoio thesis brigham young university provooprovo

blair william co1949 additional data on crania from the warren mounds utahutahoitaho

american antiquity vol 14 no 3 apoppoppap 2245

burgh robert F and charles R scoggin1948 the archaeology of castle parkparky dinosaur national monument

university of colorado studiesstudiestudle seriesserles in anthropology noonoeno202 boulderboulderoboulderyBoul

champe

dero

jo lo101949 white cat villageovillagevillagerVillviii americanageo antiquity vol 14 no 4

ppoppapoap 28592285 92antiantl

C

relation psno

J

coloraclora& 0

C

WI am C

149

sl seriesinriesinSe

491

leal

Page 157: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1calcai

untUniversi

investiinvests ons

ethnetan 9 190219031902290391902 190329039washington

cutler hugh co1966 carrccrr curcurbitsCurcur andbits cotton from glen canyon anthro

logicalpologicaloologicalpo papers of the university of utah noo 80 0 saltlake cityocitycilyo

debloois evan io1967 archaeologicalarchaeologiarchaeology studies in central utahoutahitaho unpublished

preliminary MAmoko reportoreport brigham young universityuniversityo

enger walter do1942 archaeology of black rock and cave utah reprinted in

1950 in university of utah anthropological papers nonoo 770

salt lake city

enger walter do and william co blairklairbiair1947 crania from the warren mounds and their possible signif-

icance to northern periphery archaeology amerleanamericanAmerigneriantiquity

cailcajieailvol 12 noo 2 ppap 14246142 46

universeuniversi

149

christensenChri rcssrossrassstenser tu1947 A preliminary report of archaeological investigations near

utahutahoitaho MA thesis brigham young university provoprove

collncolinculin stewart1907 games of the north american indians in the 24th arival

report of the bureau of american ethnology

euler robert co

1964 southern paiute archaeology american antiquity volvolovolevoievoi 29noo 39 PP 3798lo37981037981079810379 salt81 lake city

frisonprison george co

1965 spring creek cave wyomingifyomingo american antiquityg volovoi 31 y

noo 1 apoppoppap 819481 salt94 lake city

gebhardgebGeh davidhard1966 the shield motif in plains rock artoartant american antiquity

volovolvoi 31 no 8 part I1 ppoppapoap 721732721732o7217320821732821232721221 salt732232 lake citycityocilyo

gillin john1938 archaeological investigations in nine mile canyoncanyons utah

reprinted 1955 in universityUniver ofsiszsilzslyz utah anthropological papersno 21 salt lake city

gillin9gillingilline john po

1941 archaeological investigations in central utahoutahitaho peabodypeemuseum

dpapers vol 17 no 20 cambridge massachusetts

gil sen leileland1967 archaeological investigations at the hinckley sitesitessltes 42ut110942u1110

196667 field classoclass unpublished mosomso department ofanthropology and archaeology brigham young universityouniversity

T

port

C

C rn

D

D C

111

no

C

no

C

antig tygtystzgno

89

lake7ity

P

2

gilsen leland

ms9university

utahs noz

caves

Page 158: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

I1 cac0

antlantivolovolvoi 30 nooneo 1 ppoppapoap 74807480074 80 salt800 lake city

gunnerson james ho1956 plains promontory relationships american antiquity

volovolvoi 22229 no 1 ppoppapoap 69726972069 72072 salt lake cityocitycilyo

1957 an archaeological survey of the fremont areagreao universityof utah anthropological papers noono 28028 salt lake citycityocilyo

1960a A introduction to plain apache archaeology the dismalriver aspectoaspectaspecio bureau of american ethnology bulletin173 ppoppapoap 131260131265131iol101 260265 washingtonowashingtonwashingtondWashing

1960b

tono

the fremont cultureocultureculturesCulcui internaltureo dimensions and externalrelationshipsorelationshipsRelationship american antiquity volo 25 noo 3 ppoapo07008003733800373 salt38000800 lake cityocitycilyo

jamesonjamesonyJame sidneysongsony jo so1958 archaeological notes on stansbury islandoisland university of

utah anthropological papers noo ao3o3034 salt lake cityocitycilyo

jones carl hugh1958 A puebloidPue sitebloid in utah valley utah archaeology volo 4

noo 2 ppoppapoap 713713071007 loo13 salt lake cityocitycilyo

1961 anar archaeological survey of utah county utahoutahitaho MA thesisothesisbrigham young universityouniversity

juddjudds neil mo

1917 evidence of circular kivas in western utah ruinsoruins americananthropologist volvolovoi 19 noo lo10 menashaoMena

1926

shao

archaeological observations north of the rio coloradoocoloradocoloradosColobureau

radooof american ethnology bulletin noo 82 washingtonowashingtonwashingtondWashing

kehoekehoe9

tonotoro

thomas fo1960 stone tipi rings in north central montana and the adjacent

portion of alberta canada their historical ethrologicalethrologicalsethnologicalEthroand anthropological

logicallogicalsarchaeological papersaspectsaspeetsoAspe nooetSo 62

bureauburema of american ethnology bulletin nooneo 173 ppoppapoap 41774417washingtonowashingtonwashingtondWashing

74

1966

tono

the small side notched point system of the northern plainsoplainsplainseamerleanamericanamerlameri antiquitycanean volovolvoiantlanti 31o0

noo ay6y ppoppapoap 82841827841082782 salt841841olake cityocilyo

archaeoarchago ip

150

green dee fo1961 archaeological investigations at the G M hinckley sitesitey

utah county utah 1959191959 moaMA19 thesis brighamyoung university

1964 the hinckley figurines as indicators of the position ofutah valley in the sevier culturecultureoculturesCulcui americantureo antiquity

F

309 no

H

an

259 no

J S

P no

410

no

coun y

M

no 1

no

F

no

no 6

So

Page 159: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

keraeerakerk

nceneeneb 1 glen canyon series no 3 s14 leparrbtret

anencrencrem

keaiea

sitessltes

faf7anciscofranciscoalciscoan

lamblsmblnmb

cisco

sydney M

1958 linguistic prehistory in the great basin inter ol01o

journall

of american lingvisticslinguistics vol 24 no 2 ppap95100 baltimore

lister rbR bcalntln

aloriper

al11 4

lpialpi fangsfdngsrangs of the high plains american antiquityvol 26 no 3 part I11 ppap 38l3819 saltsait lake city

leighsheightmeighs clement W

1956 excavations at paragonahPara Sgonah summary from archecliccrlexcavations in iron county utah on university of utahanthropological papers no 20 salt lake city

morss noel1931 the ancient itureculture of the fremont river in utah peperspapers

of the peabody museum of american archaeologykreare volviivoivilhaeo 12129loey9no 3 cambridge

universiuniverse f

anthaeanthre oo1 gicaificai

o th ns F and bruce A mccorgeodale391191 chethe aonleaannlea point

0

horizon marker for the northwejterrplains plains anthropologist vol101voi 6 N 13 ppap 1-188

H

195 thath3 co nb iesitesieS universityun ofhersityversity C loradborad ar tcglp3r

j

lister robert H je richard ambler and florence C lierl6l161igligiloglal the coombs site university ofOPO utahP anthrcpologicno 41 glen canyon series no 35 parpart II11

salt lake city

liteu311 rbc rt H andnd florence C lister19611961iggi the coombs site university of utah anthropological

papers p no 41 glen canyon seriesserlesserlestserless no 3 part III111liililsalt lake city

maloufMaloimarouf carlcaricanicarlingingL9391939gog anttantithoughts quon iutah tyarchaeology american antiqiy vol

N 31 ppoppapoap 311328311oiloii0102831328

1956 jt

328

prehistoric exchange in utah universityuniversityaf ofaf ughh anthropologicalologicaltropologicalrop papers no 1 ppap 262 ae6e salt6 lake city

10 telwetwe ardaelogy of sites along fifteen M crursityurrityUr ofsityity utah anthropologicalanthropoloc paperPical N

3 saltsal lake city

1961 the tipi

rr

TT

T e amoravoramonPIC1 rs 111 1c

tnen H

1

me

1 qc8

rt he

noe eye y

k L 1 111j 11

N

robe 111 he V

T

C ombs sltessites universiuniverseUniversi

TR blor he

89

1l

P clotyity

1

T

twe

ca

CL

95- 100

t

9

northwo ter s

lf

S 1 tes

antiqii ithity

Universi

yen

88

ac

ambs

ab tegl

abc

CoiaCoincolncolacoltpany sanygg196yog 3rdrciir sromfrom scientificS americanq 14en Hhef freersereerfri

ndatc

coiapanycoinpanyamegmeri can

norgannonnanbonnan

kenenK fh IL

.8888

Page 160: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

phipphlp

152

mulloy william1958 A preliminary historical outline for the northwestern

plains university of wyoming publications vol 22no 1 laramie

petersen herbert N

1953 structure and pelargonic stratigraphystrastre oftigraphygraphyti the current creekarea near goshen utah unpublished MS brigham younguniversity

reagan albert B

1935 archaeological report of field work done in utah in 1934-35 utah academy of sciences arts and letters vol 12ppap 508850 salt88 lake city

reed erik K

1955 human skeletal remains from the turner look site in A

reappraisal or the fremont culture by H M wormingtonproceedings denver museum of natural history noldenver

rudy jack R

1953 archaeological survey of western utah university of utahanthropologicalAnthron papersological no 12 salt lake city

rudy jack R and earl stoddard1954 site on fremont island in great salt lake american

antiquity vol 19 no 8 ppap 285 90 salt lake city

sirrine keith1953 geology of warm springs mountain goshen utah unpu-

blished MS brigham young university

sharrock floyd W

1965 preliminary report on excavations at the nephinuhi site nephiutah special unpublished report prepared for the nationalscience foundation salt lake city

1966 prehistoric occupation patterns in southwest wyoming andcultural relationships with the great basin and plainscultural areas university of utah anthropologicalpapers no 77 salt lake city

shepard anna 01961 ceramics for the archaeologarchaeologistarchaeology

washington D C

carnegie institute of

smith elmer R

1941 the archaeology of deadman cave utah reprinted 1952 inuniversity of utah anthropological papers no 10 saltlake city

hi

geol ogyagy

t

noi

Page 161: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

593393 andrnd

unpgnp lisilshed

ldoado R

eanoe&no ogyagy

ho1933 early inhabitants of western utah university of utah bull-

etin vol 23 no salt lake citycityocilyo

caves of the great salt lake regions buraubarauburgaubabaubargbarcburg ofol01auaaemcculalterAaenaeate ethnologyMCcUl bulletinBuIbul nonoorooletin 1161160ilg washington

taylor dee coC

9577959377 T19 ftemcntfr75 sitesencnttwo nd their position in southwestern pre-history university of utahottahottuitgit anthropologicalanthroj2oloah papersal nooP29

no

salt lake citycityc

wakefieldldakefie john1911933igi19 A1 study of the plant ecology of saltsaitstit lake and utra valleys

before the monnon immigrationimmigrationo unpublished MS brighamyoung university

wedel waldo ro1959 ankn introduction to kansas archaeology bureau of american

ethnology bulletin no 14 washington

wormingtrtgormingtnWorming hoH moM

195519 A reappraisal of the fremont culturecultureoculturesCulcui denvertureetureo museumItis ofeuraeuianatural history noe lo10 denver

chairman major department

steele raymond duanedaanenanemane390590 goshen valley history bookcraft salt lake city

stewardsteuardstoward jianjinlan

0J hengo z hi st

H

10 3

2871 no 3

tlie1c an eth no

T

idfc logy ut

W

5no 1

CII1 iairmanl VLa or

s- it

tr

Universit9936

heh

tuh

ac

mexicomedeomemeo bulletin vol 28 anthropology series volovolvoiij neo 30 albuquerque

13 ancienancient

universityuniversituniversia ofnew

936.936 pueblo material culture in western utah

Page 162: An Archaeological Survey of Goshen Valley, Utah County

andang

suosub

shoshonishoshone and unknown A

cultural sequence of food collecting loliowedioliowedloliioli byowed farming followed by food

collecting was in evidence in the material remains of the valley

the remainder of the thesis deals with theoretical developments

and the relationships of the fremont farming sites in the valley to the over-

all fremont culture the information obtained from the survey ancianaancl

analysis of the material culture of the fremont sites lends support to

tnetheane jones green ambler hypothesis that there was a divisondavison between the

provo and the sevier subareassubsuu onareas the basis of trait distributions

APPROVED

inhadinha

ABSTRACT

this thesis is a field report on thetiletiie archaeologicalarchaeolo sitesical surveyed

by anctnc author in goshen valley utah county utah the survey has the

threefold objectives of 1 surveying and recording of sitesitessltes in goshen

valley 2 providingprovidinproviden information on the material culture of the ancient

mhaoitants of the valley ana 3 discovering whether there was a dividing

line during the fremont occupation between the provo and sevier regions

as outlined by jones 1961 green 1964 and ambler 19661960tiggolgg

to thistnisanis end seventy four sites are described along withalth the

related material culture with an analysis of the material culture in the

appropriate sections of thehe thesis cultural material has been cataorizedcatagonzed

into tnreethreeenree main affiliations fremont

T

chairman advisory committee

A

member advisory commielcommiecr

f

chairman major departmentdepartndeparts lent

0

llyily

ob ec f survey d recordsrecordi ng s inj livesulves 0 inoing an

61tants

lth

ith

IL

1

n

follo ed

in

in

subareas

irman adv

Sho shoni

pro vidin a

con u i i tteeC a isoryisery I1

conini4cc

ith

atee