an experiment in computed tomography physics department portland state university, portland, or...

17
An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott ([email protected]) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap Ralf Widenhorn ([email protected]) Buzug, Thorsten M. Computed Tomography: From Photon Statistics to Modern Cone-Beam CT

Upload: ashlie-jordan

Post on 16-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

An experiment in computed tomography

Physics DepartmentPortland State University, Portland, OR

Elliot Mylott ([email protected])Ryan KlepetkaJustin DunlapRalf Widenhorn ([email protected])

Buzug, Thorsten M. Computed Tomography: From Photon Statistics to Modern Cone-Beam CT

Page 2: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Objectives

To design a lab that Introduces students to

CT Utilizes light instead of X-

rays Requires little setup Fast data collection and

analysis Reinforces concepts of

light/matter interaction Can highlight CT specific

issues

Page 3: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

An Example of X-rays and Projections for Students

X-ray tube

X-ray film Projecti

ons

Page 4: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

CT and Back Projection

X-ray source rotates around an object accumulating projection data

Projection data reflect the attenuation of the X-ray by the object

Projection data is spread back onto a reconstructed image

Multiple scans from different angles result in an image of the original object

Pro

jectio

n D

ata

X-ray Source

Pro

jec

tio

n

Dat

a

1

111

1

1

1

11

1

Projection Data

Back projection image

1

Page 5: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

An Example of Back Projection for StudentsThree light sources on a cylinder

Shadows (projections) converge at the cylinder

Page 6: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Scanner Generations

3rd Generation

•Rotation Only•Large Fan Beam•Large Detector Array

1st Generation 2nd Generation 4th Generation

•Translation & Rotation•Pencil Beam•Single Detector

•Translation & Rotation•Small Fan Beam•Small Detector Array

•Rotation Only•Large Fan Beam•Stationary Detector Array

•Rotation Only•Pencil Beam (Simulated Fan Beam)•Single Detector (Simulated Large Detector Array)

Page 7: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Hidden Objects

http://amasci.com/amateur/irgogg2.html

Page 8: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Apparatus

Page 9: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Comparison to X-ray CT Scanners

Rotate X-ray Source

Rotate Scanned Area

Page 10: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Comparison to X-ray CT Scanners

Analog Projection Data

Attenuation0 1

Photogate Scan

X-ra

y tu

be Digital

Projection Data

Page 11: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Focus-Center Distance (FCD)

Rotational Axis

Scanning line

y

x

IR Source

IR Detector

Scanner Geometry

Variables

•FCD – distance between the center of the grid and the rotary motion sensor

•θ - The angle between the rotary motion sensor and the x-axis

• φ – The angle between the focal length line and the scanning line

Output

Equation for the scanning line (y=mx+b)

Page 12: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

LabVIEW

•Displays data in real time•No programming experience needed•Can be adjusted for different computer speeds•Will be available as an .exe file

Page 13: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Creating an Image

Page 14: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Creating an Image

Original Positions Final Reconstruction

θ=180

θ=360

Page 15: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

CT Concepts - Artifacts

Back projection results in additional, unwanted data.

Page 16: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

CT Concepts -Windowing

Change in Gray Scale Value

Page 17: An experiment in computed tomography Physics Department Portland State University, Portland, OR Elliot Mylott (emylott@pdx.edu) Ryan Klepetka Justin Dunlap

Conclusion