an introduction to qualitative research 2
DESCRIPTION
Introduction of Qualitative ResearchTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RADHIKA VIRURU, PH.D.DEPT. OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES
QATAR UNIVERSITY
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Day 2
![Page 2: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Qualitative axioms (Lincoln and Guba, 1985)
The nature of reality: multiple, constructed and holistic
The relationship of knower to known: interactive, inseparable.
Generalization: a “working hypothesis” that describes a single case
Causal linkages: mutual simultaneous shaping.
Inquiry is value bound.
![Page 3: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Characteristics of qualitative inquiry (ibid)
Natural setting: phenomena take their meaning as much from their contexts as they do from themselves. Demands attention to multiplicities in situations.
The human instrument: no other instrument can adjust to/appreciate multiple realities. Can cope with indeterminacy. Can respond immediately to data. Can be trained to be trustworthy
Uses tacit knowledge.Qualitative methods (though not exclusively) : not
anti quantitative but focuses more on the particular
![Page 4: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Characteristics of naturalistic inquiry
Purposive sampling: try to choose a sample that gives you the widest range, to include as much information as possible (maximum variation sampling). Sampling is emergent; serial; continually focused and selected to the point of redundancy
Inductive data analysis. Grounded theory: theory that emerges from the
data and that “explains” the data. Negative case analysis
Emergent design: “Tell me what questions I need to ask, and then answer them for me”. Emerges through continuous data analysis, interactions, peer debriefing, journals.
![Page 5: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Characteristics of naturalistic inquiry:
Negotiated outcomes: obligation to consult participants.
“Case study” reportingIdiographic (particular) rather than
generalizable interpretations.Tentative application.Special criteria for trustworthiness.
![Page 6: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
When to use qualitative research
“Quality” versus “quantity”.For problems that need explorationFor problems that need a complex detailed
understanding.To empower individual and collective voices.To write in styles that push the limits of
formal academic narrativesTo understand contextsThe question of “fit”
![Page 7: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Five Approaches to Qualitative Research:
Based on “Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
![Page 8: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Narrative Research
Narrative research: begins with the experiences as expressed in lived and told stories of individuals
Can take the form of biographical studies, life histories or oral histories.
Collecting stories and “restorying them
![Page 9: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Example abstract
In my research, which has involved collecting women’s accounts of becoming mothers, I am seeking to understand how women make sense of events throughout the process of child bearing, constructing these events into episodes, and thereby (apparently) maintaining unity within their lives
Miller, T. (2000). Losing the plot: narrative construction and Miller, T. (2000). Losing the plot: narrative construction and longitudinal childbirth research. Qualitative Health Research, longitudinal childbirth research. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 309-32310, 309-323.
![Page 10: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Phenomonological research
Describes the meaning for several individuals of their lived experience of a certain phenomena.
Can center around basic broad questions: “what have you experienced in terms of the phenomena” and “what contexts have influenced your experience of the phenomena”
![Page 11: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Example abstract
Given the intricacies of power and gender in the academy, what are doctoral advisement relationships between women advisors and women advisees really like?
Heinrich, K. T. (1995). Doctoral advisement relationships between women. Journal of Higher Education. 66, pp. 447-469.
![Page 12: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Grounded theory research
Employed in situations where it is perceived as necessary to go beyond description and generate theory.
Use of the constant comparative methodCan lead to follow up quantitative research
![Page 13: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Example abstract
The primary purpose of this article is to present a grounded theory of academic change that is based on research based by two major research questions: What are the major sources of academic change? What are the major processes through which academic change occurs?
Conrad, C.F. (1978). A grounded theory of academic change. Sociology of Education, 51, 101-112.
![Page 14: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ethnographic research
This kind of research focuses on an entire cultural group: describes their shared patterns of values, behavior, language and culture…
Field work as method of data collection.
![Page 15: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Example abstract
This article examines how the work and the talk of stadium employees reinforce certain meanings of baseball in society, and it reveals how this work and talk create and maintain ballpark culture
Trujillo, N. (1992). Interpreting (the work and talk of) baseball. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 350-371.
![Page 16: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Case study research
This kind of research involves the study of an issue explored through one or two cases within a setting or context.
![Page 17: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Example abstract
The purpose of this study was to take a look into education through the eyes of three teachers who are facing their final year as professional educators. The overarching goal was to determine how they have seen children, teachers, administration, policy, and testing change across the thirty year span of their work as teachers in Texas’ public schools. Through their comments they give a considerable amount of insight into the transformation education has experienced in the last three decades. But unexpectedly, they reveal as much about our changing society than they do education itself.
Project submitted in EDCI 690, Summer 2005, Texas A&M University.
![Page 18: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Designing and carrying out qualitative studies
![Page 19: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Designing naturalistic inquiries
Naturalistic designs must emerge and unfold as the study progresses.
Not all of the elements can be specified ahead of time, but some can.
Determining where and from whom data will be collected. Identifying initial sample and making provisions for orderly
evolutionPhases of inquiry: (can overlap)
Orientation and overview. Focused exploration Member checking
Determining instrumentation: teams and training
![Page 20: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Designing naturalistic inquiries
Planning data collection and recording: Interview/participant observation.. Recording: advantages of field notes over recording
Planning data analysis procedures: must begin early and be ongoing.
Planning logisticsPlanning for trustworthiness
![Page 21: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Participant observation (Spradley 1980)
Dual purposes of participant observation: To engage in activities To observe activities
Explicit awareness: becoming aware of things that you normally block out.
Wide angle lens: wider circle of awarenessInsider/outsider experiences.IntrospectionRecord keepingAwareness of what is not there
![Page 22: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Kinds of participation
Non participation (study of TV programs)Passive participation (courtroom spectator)Moderate participation (“watching” video
games)Active participation (learning to do what
others are doing)Complete participation
![Page 23: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Descriptive observations
Based on descriptive questions that ethnographer has in mind
Grand tour observations and mini tour observationsKey things to observe:
Space Actor Activities Objects Acts Events Time Goal Feelings
![Page 24: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Field notes
Issues with taking notes openly: Assures that research is being carried out openly Cannot always take breaks (take time out) Do not always fit the situation Being careful about when to take them.
Jottings: Include initial impressions Include descriptive and reflective notes. Small notepads Symbols Key events (both personal and collective)
![Page 25: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Increasing the value of jottings
Include key components of scenes or interactions observed.
Avoid making generalizations: don’t describe someone as inefficient, include details.
Include sensory details: instead of describing someone as “angry”, describe them. Include speculation about motives as questions rather than facts.
Experiment with what kinds of details jog the memory.
Limit the time in the setting
![Page 26: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Form of field notes (Bogden and Biklen)
Title and other identifying data.If taking notes on site, experiment with
different ways of organizing notes. There is no one right way!!
Use many paragraphsLeave large margins on the left sideLanguage identification principle (Spradley)The verbatim principle
![Page 27: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Qualitative interviews
Kinds of interviews: Informal. Not a major source of data but not without
purpose. Can have some questions ready. Informants must know that these too are “data”
Formal/semistructured: Planned ahead. Researcher in charge. Combination of structure and flexibility. Expect the unexpected.
Standardized interviews: limited use in qualitative studies. Answers transcribed by researchers.
Getting prepared: Thinking through what interviews can be done and with
whom.
![Page 28: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Selecting participants
Extreme or deviant case samples (Teacher of the Year) Maximum variation samples (different perspectives on same
phenomena) Homogenous samples (individuals with similar characteristics) Typical samples (considered typical) Stratified purposeful samples (representing samples of
interest) Snowball samples (one person identifies another) Criterion samples (individuals who fit certain criteria) Theory based samples Confirming and disconfirming samples Convenience samples In all cases, participants should know/negotiate the ground
rules for the interviews.
![Page 29: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Developing questions
Most qualitative interview questions are open ended. Hatch’s categorization
Essential Extra or follow up questions Probing Throwaway/Background
Spradley’s categorization: Descriptive Structural Contrast
Writing effective questions: Language familiar to respondents Clear/neutral Respectful
![Page 30: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Qualities of good interviews
Begin with small talkListening:
Follow up on of course statements Listen for key words Probing questions Use of why questions (Don’t ask for meaning, ask for
use) Self disclosure
![Page 31: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Member checking (Lincoln and Guba, 1985)
When to finish an interview: Information is redundant Fatigue on both sides Responses get guarded
“play back” for the informant what has been said Invites respondent to validate the constructions made. Can induce respondent to add new materials that he
or she is reminded of. Puts the respondent on record, so harder to deny it
later.
![Page 32: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Taking notes (Lincoln and Guba, 1985).
Disadvantages: One cannot record everything. Rapid handwriting is sometimes undecipherable. Respondent may slow down to accommodate the
interviewer and lose train of thought.Advantages:
Forces careful attention Can interpolate questions or comments on to the
notes without knowledge of interviewee. Notes can easily be flagged for follow ups Member checking is easier.
![Page 33: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Unobtrusive measures
Gathered without direct involvement of the participants: does not interfere with ongoing activities.
Artifacts.Traces: wear spots.DocumentsPersonal communicationsRecordsPhotographsHistorical data
![Page 34: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Working with unobtrusive data
Helpful in triangulationExplanationsMust be careful about making interpretationsCollections of data may not be organized.Specify ahead of time what kinds of
unobtrusive data will be collected.Organize it carefully
![Page 35: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Building trustworthiness
JournalsTriangulationDebriefingAudit trail
![Page 36: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Validity and reliability in qualitative research or trustworthiness (Lincoln and
Guba, 1985).
Common criticisms of qualitative research: Subjective; “loudest bangs or brightest lights”.
Four common criteria: Internal validity (measuring what was intended):
that changes in the dependent variable are caused by controlled variation of the independent variable. Common threats such as maturation, testing.
External validity: relationship can be generalized across similar populations.
Reliability: dependability, stability and consistency. Usually tested by replication.
Objectivity: usual criteria is intersubjective agreement.
![Page 37: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Naturalistic trustworthiness criteria
Credibility: activities that make it more likely that credible findings and interpretations will be produced. Prolonged engagement: the investment of sufficient
time to where one can take account of distortions that might creep into data. Also a time to build trust.
Persistent observation: identify salient characteristics of the situation.
Triangulation: use of different sources, methods, investigators and theories (more problematic in naturalistic inquiry).
![Page 38: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Credibility
Peer debriefing: talking to a disinterested peer about inquiry. Can test hypotheses Opportunity for catharsis.
Referential adequacy: making data available for scrutiny.
Member checks: not just at the end of an interview but at end of case study. May take an entire day with multiple stakeholders.
![Page 39: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Transferability and dependability
Transferability is similar to external validity. Provision of thick description.
Dependability and confirmability (similar to reliability): Overlap methods. Audit trails for both process (how study was
conducted) and the product (if accurate or not).
![Page 40: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081520/5695d4851a28ab9b02a1bb83/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Reflexive journals
Includes information both about self and method.
Can include: Daily schedule and logistics of study. Personal diary Methodological log