an introductionto airwothiness&...
TRANSCRIPT
An introduction to
Airwothiness & Type Certification
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 1
Airwothiness & Type Certification
Eng. Giovanni Di Antonio
The information contained in this presentation is intended for educational purpose only, it exclusively refect the Author’s ideas and point of view and in some parts may not be completely updated. The content of this presentation has not been formally endorsed neither by the Italian Civil Aviation
Authority (ENAC) nor by the European Aviation Agency (EASA) or other Civil Aviation Authorities. Any implementation of the approaches and methodologies exposed in ths presentation remains under the complete responsibility of the implementer.
Rome, 20 Sep. 2017
SUMMARY
What we are talking about?
• Aviation safety
• Regulatory Framework and Civil Aviation Authorities
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 2
• Why we need Type Certification?
• Airworthiness Standards
• Type Certification Process
Regulations
Standards
a/c
Aerodr.
SAFETY APPROACH IN AVIATION
Safety is assured by imposing Tech. Req.s & Procedures to the Aviation System
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 4
Certificati
Oversight
Safety(occuants)
Org.
Pers.Source: Internet
WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT?
Airworthiness
Possession of the necessary requirements for flying in safeconditions within allowable limits
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 7
(ENAC Technical Regulation)
Requirements
Safety
WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT?
Source: Internet
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 8
SafetyAirworth.
AllowableLimits
THE MACHINE
Aeronautical Product
AircraftEnginePropeller
Source: Internet
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 9
Aircraft (ICAO definition)Any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of
the air other than the reactions of the air against the earth’s surface
STATISTICS
Accident Summary by Type of Operation Worldwide Commercial Jet Fleet | 1959 – 2015
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 12
Tot: 1918 accidents
STATISTICS
Departures, Flight Hours, and Jet Airplanes in Serv ice Worldwide Operations Commercial Jet Airplanes (MTOM > 27216 kg)
Accident Rate = 1918 / 1321E+6 FH = 1.45 E-6 / FH
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 13
1321 mililon FH
STATISTICS
ICAO Accident Records 2011-2015Sheduled Commercial Flights (MTOM > 5700 kg)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 14
Total number of accident = 503
Total number of flight hours (estimated) = 272 E+6 FH
Accident Rate = 503 / 272E+6 = 1.85 E-6 /FH
[Source: ICAO Safety Report 2016]
STATISTICS
Accident Rates and Onboard Fatalities by YearWorldwide Commercial Jet Fleet | 1959 - 2015
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 15
STATISTICS
Fatal Accidents and Onboard Fatalities by Phase of Flight Worldwide Commercial Jet Fleet | 2006 - 2015
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 16
STATISTICS
Fatalities by Aviation Occurrence CategoriesWorldwide Commercial Jet Fleet | 2006 - 2015
[TO BE NOTICED]
Only 10% of accidents is due to technical causes related to
system failures
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 17
THE CONCEPT OF SAFETY
Safety and Probability• Air navigation must be «safe» … what does it means? … how much?• Let us consider a generic “unwanted harmful events”
• To the machine• To people (occupants or third parties on the ground or in the air)• To properties & goods
• The probability that such an event occurs must be sufficently low
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 18
Source: CS-25 Book 2, AMC 25.1309
how low is
low enough?
THE CONCEPT OF SAFETY
Safety objectives : How to define acceptable level of probabilties?Let us consider a catastophic (CAT) event of a large aircraft
E = “a CAT event occurs”T = “the event is due to techincal causes (system failure)”T|E = “CAT event is due to technical causes (CAT failure)”Fi (i=1, …, n) = technical failures that lead to CAT event (n = 100, assumption)
P(E) = 1E-6/ FH (accident rate from the statistics)P(T|E) = 1E-1 (from the statistics)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 19
P(T|E) = 1E-1 (from the statistics)p = P(Fi) = max allowed prob. (per FH) for system CAT failure (SAFETY TARGET)
We must have :P(E ∧ T) = P(E)*P(T|E) == P(F1 ∨… ∨ F100) = (small prob.) == P(F1)+ …+P(F100) = p + ... + p = 100*p
� (1E-6)(1E-1) = 100*p � p = 1E-9 / FH
Part 2
The Regulatory Framework and the
Pag. 20
The Regulatory Framework and the Civil Aviation Autorities
REGUALTORY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
ChicagoConvention
(ICAO)
National Regulation
(EU Members)
Three regulatory frameworks: ICAO–EU–NATIONAL
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 21
EU Regulation(EASA)
OBBLIGATIONS
THE INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK
Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago, 1944)
– The Chicago Convention regulates the international civil aviation– Establishes the ICAO
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 22
[Source: Internet]
ICAO – International Civil Aviation Organisation
• UN specialised Agency established by the ChicagoConvention in 1944
• It regulates and controls the international civil aviation
• It regulates and oversighs the international civil aviationto the aim of harmoniziation
• It assures the uniform adoption of the provisionscontained in the Annexes to the Chicago Convention
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 23
contained in the Annexes to the Chicago Convention (SARPs – Standards and Recommended Practices)
• It promotes the safe development of the international civilaviation in a context of reciprocity and fair competition
ICAO only drafts policy when there was a high degree of maturity and
experience within one or several of its member States
ICAO ANNEXES
Chicago Convention Under the Art 37 each Contracting State must adopt and implement the standards contained in the ICAO Annexes
ICAO Annexes
Contains minimum safety objectives in terms of– Standards (mandatory) &
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 24
– Standards (mandatory) &– Recommendend Practices (optional)
� «SARP»
>>Up to now: 10000 SARPs of which 5000 related to groundinfrastructures
ICAO ANNEXES
• Annex 1 Personnel Licensing
• Annex 2 Rules of the Air
• Annex 3 Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation
• Annex 4 Aeronautical Charts
• Annex 5 Units of Measurement to be Used in Air and GroundOperations
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 25
Operations
• Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft
• Annex 7 Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks
• Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft
High level techical safetyrequirements
ICAO ANNEXES
• Annex 9 Facilitation
• Annex 10 Aeronautical Telecommunications
• Annex 11 Air Traffic Services
• Annex 12 Search and Rescue
• Annex 13 Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation
• Annex 14 Aerodromes
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 26
• Annex 14 Aerodromes
• Annex 15 Aeronautical Information Services
• Annex 16 Environmental Protection
• Annex 17 Security: Safeguarding InternationalCivil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference
• Annex 18 The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
• Annex 19 Safety Management
Annex 16
Volume I(Noise)
Volume II(Fuel Venting & Emissions)
STANDARD AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICIES (SARPs)
• Standard
• “Any specification for� Physical characteristics� Configuration� Material� Performance� Personnel� or Procedure
• the uniform application of which
• Recommended Practices
• “Any specification for� Physical characteristics� Configuration� Material� Performance� Personnel� or Procedure
• the uniform application of which
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 27
• the uniform application of whichis recognized as necessary forthe safety or regularity ofinternational air navigation
• and to which Contracting Stateswill conform in accordance withthe Convention;
• in the event of impossibility ofcompliance, notification to theCouncil is compulsory underArticle 38 of the Convention”
• the uniform application of whichis recognized as desirable inthe interest of safety, regularityor efficiency of international airnavigation
• and to which Contracting Stateswill endeavour to conform inaccordance with the Convention.
• States are invited to inform theCouncil of non-compliance.”
ICAO ANNEX 8
Annex 8
Definitions
Procedures
TypeCertificate
Production
Certificate ofAirworthiness
ContinuingAirworthiness
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 28
TecnicalReq.s
SmallAircraft
750 kg < MTOM ≤ 5700 kg
LargeAircraft
MTOM > 5700 kg
Helicopters
Engines& Propellers MTOM = Maximum Take-Off Mass
ICAO ANNEX 8
ICAO Annex 8 – Scope
• In the interest of safety (of occupants, other airc raft, third parties and property) , an aircraft must be designed, constructed and operated in compliance with the appropriate airworthiness requirements of the State of Registry of the aircraft
• The aircraft is issued with a Certificate of Airworthiness declaring it is fit to fly
• ICAO Standards would not replace national regulatio ns and codes of
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 29
• ICAO Standards would not replace national regulatio ns and codes of airworthiness containing the full scope and extent of detail considered necessary for the certification
• Each State is free to develop its own detailed code of airworthiness or to adopt those established by another Contracting State
• The State of Registry can recognize an airworthiness certificate issued by another Contracting State, if the airworthiness requirements under which such a certificate is issued are equal to or above the minimum standards contain ed in Annex 8
ICAO ANNEX 8
Anticipated operating conditions
• Environment in which an aircraft is expected to perform known from experience, reasonably envisaged to occur during the operational life of the aircraft
• Take into account the operations for which the aircraft is made eligible(Weather, terrain surrounding the aerodromes, functioning of the aircraft, efficiency of personnel, …)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 30
personnel, …)
• Do not include extremes
– which can be effectively avoided by operating procedures
– which occur so infrequently that higher levels of airworthiness to meet them would render aircraft operations impracticable
ICAO ANNEX 8
Minimum (objective) technical requirements
Performance & Flying qualities
Structural Design & Construction
Engine & Propeller Design and Installation
Systems & Equipment Design and Installation
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 31
Systems & Equipment Design and Installation
Operating Limitations & Information
Crashworthiness & Cabin safety
Operating Environment and Human Factors
Security
EU REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Implementing Rules for Type Certification
Reg. (EU) 748/2012 – Annex I (Part 21)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 32
Source: www.easa.europa.eu
EU REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Regulation (EU) 216/2008
(Basic Regulation – BR)
“on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a
European Aviation Safety Agency”
- It establishes the EU regulatory framework for aviation
- It establishes the European Safety Agency (EASA)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 33
- It defines the Essential Requirements
The BR calls up the Chicago Convention
“The Chicago Convention (…) provides for minimum standards to ensure the safety of civil
aviation and environmental protection”
“Community essential requirements and rules adopted for their implementation should
ensure that Member States fulfil the obligations created by the Chicago Convention”
EU REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Basic Regulation Scope
Art. 2
Main scope“To establish and maintain a high uniform level of civil aviation safety in Europe”
Some other scopes
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 34
Some other scopes
“To promote cost-efficiency in the regulatory and certification processes and to
avoid duplication at national and European level”
“To assist Member States in fulfilling their obligations under the Chicago
Convention, by providing a basis for a common interpretation and uniform
implementation of its provisions, and by ensuring that its provisions are duly taken
into account in this Regulation and in the rules drawn up for its implementation”
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS
Essential Requirements
(Annex I - Basic Regualation)
• Performance based high level safety requiremens in compiance with
ICAO Annexes
“Community essential requirements and rules adopted for their implementation should
ensure that Member States fulfil the obligations created by the Chicago Convention”
Products … shall comply with the environmental
protection requirements (Art. 6 BR)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 35
ensure that Member States fulfil the obligations created by the Chicago Convention”
EssentialRequirement
(ER)
ER forairworthiness
ER forenvironmental
protection
Aircraft … shall comply with the essential
requirements for airworthiness (Art. 5 BR)
EASA
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
• Estabished by Reg. (EU) 1592/2002 (repealed by Reg. (EU) 261/2008)
• On behalf of the Member States, it assumes its obligations arising frominternational and bilateral treaties
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 36
• It issues the technical saftey regulation (airwhorthiness standards) accordingto the ICAO Annexes along with the relevat interpretative material• CS – Certification Specifications• AMC & GM – Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material
• It certifies• Products (i.e. aircaft, engines and propellers)• Parts and Appliances• Design Organizations
EASA
EASA tasks
Art. 20 Basic Regulation
1. The Agency shall, where applicable and as specified in the Chicago
Convention or its Annexes, carry out on behalf of Member States the
functions and tasks of the state of design, manufacture or registry
when related to design approval –
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 37
(a) establish and notify the type-certification basis
(b) establish and notify the specific airworthiness specifications
(e) conduct, itself or through national aviation authorities or
qualified entities, investigations associated with products, parts
and appliances certification
(f) issue the appropriate type-certificates
EASA
2. With regard to organisations, the Agency shall:
(a) conduct, itself or through national aviation authorities or qualified
entities, inspections and audits of the organisations it certifies
(b) issue and renew the certificates of:
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 38
(i) design organisations
(ii) production organisations located within the territory of the
Member States, if requested by the Member State concerned
(iii) production and maintenance organisations located outside
the territory of the Member States
Part 3
Why we need Type Ceritification?
Pag. 39
Why we need Type Ceritification?EU Regulation (part 21)
TYPE CERTIFICATION SUMMARY
Type Cerification (at a glance)
• An aircarft can be admitted to the international naviation if it holds a valid
Certificate of Airworthiness (CoA)
• To have a CoA it must demonstrate that
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 40
• To have a CoA it must demonstrate that
� The single a/c conforms to an approved Type Design , and
� It must have no unsafe characteristics in relation to operations for which
it is approved
• A Type Design is approved when a Type Certificate is issued
TYPE CERTIFICATION SUMMARY
• A Type Certificate can be issued when it has been verified that the Type
Design (TD) complies with its Certification Basis (CB)
• The Certification Basis is built with the requirements issued by the
EASA in compliance with the Essential Requirements of the Basic
Regulation and, hence, in compliance with ICAO Annex 8 and Annex
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 41
Regulation and, hence, in compliance with ICAO Annex 8 and Annex
16. The CB also includes the Operational Suitability Data (OSD)
• The Type Certification process essentially consists on the definition of
the CB of the relevant TD and then in the verification that the TD
complies with the CB’s requirements
TYPE CERTIFICATION LEGAL BASIS
Based on the Chicago Convention
Art. 31 – Every aircraft engaged in international navigation shall be provided with a certificate of airworthiness issued or rendered valid by the State in which it is registered.
Art 37 – Each contracting State undertakes to collaborate in securing the highest practicable degree of uniformity in regulations, standards, procedures, and organization in relation to aircraft, personnel, airways and
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 42
procedures, and organization in relation to aircraft, personnel, airways and auxiliary services in all matters in which such uniformity will facilitate and improve air navigation. To this end ICAO shall adopt and amend (…) international SARPSs and procedures
� Each Contracting State is expected followthe ICAO Annexes
TYPE CERTIFICATION LEGAL BASIS
What does ICAO Annex 8 say about the CoA ?
– The Contracting State shall develop for each class of aircaft an airwothiness standard such that the compliance with the design requirements contaniend therein assures that the minimun safetyrequirements of Annex 8 are met (Part II Para. 1.2 )
– The Type Certificate is issued based on the evidence that the Type
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 43
– The Type Certificate is issued based on the evidence that the TypeDesign conforms to the design requirements of the applicableairworthiness code as specified in its CB (Part II Para. 1.4 )
– The Contracting State issues a Certificate of Airworthiness to an aircraft based on the evidence that the specific aircraft conforms to the design requirements of the applicable airworthiness standard (Part II Para. 3.2)
TYPE CERTIFICATION LEGAL BASIS
So, a CoA is issued …
based on the evidence that the specific aircraftconforms to the design req.s of the related aiworthiness
standard …
Yes, but how ?
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 44
Yes, but how ?
By verifing the conformity of the specific a/c to the approved Type Desing
Hence we have to understand what is a Type Design
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Type Design
It is a complet set of information necessary to unambigously identify the
configuration and the design characteristics of an aeronautical
product in order to be able to assure conformity by comparison
21.A.31
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 45
(a) The type design shall consist of:
1. the drawings and specifications, and a listing of those drawings and specifications, necessary to
define the configuration and the design features of the product shown to comply with the applicable
type-certification basis and environmental protection requirements;
2. information on materials and processes and on methods of manufacture and assembly of the
product necessary to ensure the conformity of the product;
3. an approved airworthiness limitations section of the instructions for continued airworthiness as
defined by the applicable airworthiness code; and
4. any other data necessary to allow by comparison, the determination of the airworthiness, the
characteristics of noise, fuel venting, and exhaust emissions (where applicable) of later products of
the same type.
(b) Each type design shall be adequately identified.
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Type Certificate
• It attests that a Type Design of an aeronautical product conforms
to the requirements of the established Certification Basis and
hence to the applicable airworhines standards, environemntal
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 46
requirements and to operational suitability data
• It also attests that the Type Design has no unsafe characteristics
in relation to the intended operations
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
A Type Certificate can be issued when
21.A.21
• The product to be certificated meets the applicable type-certification basis
and environmental protection
• Any airworthiness provisions not complied with are compensated for by
factors that provide an equivalent level of safety
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 47
factors that provide an equivalent level of safety
• No feature or characteristic makes it unsafe for the uses for which
certification is requested
• The engine or propeller have a type-certificate issued
• OSD data meets the applicable OSD certification basis
Basic Regulation Art. 5
2. (a) (…) The type-certificate (…) shall be issued when the applicant has shown that the product complies with a type-
certification basis (…) established to ensure compliance with the essential requirements (…) and when it has no
feature or characteristic making it unsafe for operation. The type-certificate shall cover the product, including all parts
and appliances fitted thereon
OSD=Operational Syuitability Data
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Information and data associated to a Type Certificate
21.A.41
• Type Design
• Operating Limitations
• Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) for airworthiness and emissions
• Type Certification Basis and Environmental Protection requirements
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 48
• Type Certification Basis and Environmental Protection requirements
• Any other conditions or limitations prescribed for the product
• Operational Suitability Data (OSD) and OSD certification basis
• TCDS for noise
• Record of emission compliance (for Engines)
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Restricted Type Certificate (RTC) 21.A.23
It is issued to a Type Design which does not comply with the Airwortinesss CB as defined in 21.A.21(c) if it is shown that
– Appropriate type-certification basis established by the Agency ensuring adequate safety with regard to the intended use of the a/c
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 49
ensuring adequate safety with regard to the intended use of the a/c
– Applicable environmental protection requirements
– Applicable operational suitability data certification basis designated in accordance with point 21.A.17B
CB= Certification BasisAW=Airworthinessa/c=Aircaft
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) Part 21 Subpart E
• It is an approval of a major modification to a Type Design, designed by an Applicant who is not the product’s TCH
• A major modification to a part affected by an STC is a new STC
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 50
• A major modification to a part affected by an STC is a new STC
• Only the STCH can design a major modification to its STC
• In general the STCH has to hold a DOA or an APDOA
TCH=Type Certificate HolderSTCH=Supplemental Type Certificate HolderDOA=Design Organization ApprovalAPDOA=Alternative Procedure DOA
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
European Technical Standard Order (ETSO )Part 21 Subpart O
• Technical Specificatios of Parts & Appliances to be installed onboard the a/c• The ETSO approval includes both design and production aspects• Declaration of Design and Perfomance (DDP): functional performences,
environmental limitation, qualification tests passed, maintenance to be carriedout, declaration of compliance to a specific CS-ETSO
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 51
Parts’ Ceritfication
ETSO DDP must be adequate
within a TC
Qualification & Compiance
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Certificate of Airworthiness• Attests the conformity of an a/c to the approved Type Design
• Attests the continued airworhiness of the product
Enable the a/c to the national and intenational air navigation
(Art. 764 Code of Navigation)
(Art. 31 Chicago Convention)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 52
(Art. 31 Chicago Convention)
Basic Regulation Art. 5
2.(c) each aircraft shall be issued with an individual certificate of airworthiness when it is
shown that it conforms with the type design approved in its type-certificate and that
relevant documentation, inspections and tests demonstrate that the aircraft is in
condition for safe operation.
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Continuing Airwothiness (CAW )
• An a/c holds in an airworthy state as long as it complies with the
ER (i.e. with its CB) and does not have any dangerous
characteristics in relation to its intended use
(fit -to-fly )
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 53
(fit -to-fly )• The CAW consists in all those procedures and maintenance or
corrective tasks which assure the a/c continues to hold in an
airworthy state
[Source: Internet]
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
AW
Initial AW Initial Type Certification
Maintenance ICA
Repair
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 54
CAW
Repair
TDModifications
Occurrences SB & ADAW = AirworthinessCAW=Continued AirworthinessTD=Type DesignICA=Istruction for Continued AirwothinessSB=Sevice BullettinsAD=Airwothiness Directive
Aging
Aircaft
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA )21.A.61
• Instructions necessary to carry out maintanace task i.a.w. theMaintenance Manual
• The TCH must produce, update and furnish a complete set of ICA toeach known owner of a product before its delivery or before issue ofthe first CoA whichever occurs later and then make the ICA available
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 55
the first CoA whichever occurs later and then make the ICA availableon request to any person required to comply with them
• Must be prepared in accordance with the CB req.s (CS XX.1529)
• Those ICAs dealing with overhaul or other forms of heavymaintenance, may be delayed until after the product has entered intoservice, but not after the products reaches the relevant age or flight-hours/cycles.
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
CS 25.1529 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness inaccordance with Appendix H must be prepared.
ICA content (e.g. CS- 25 large a/c)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 56
• a/c systems description, information and maintenance data• Checks and relevant procedures• Servicing• Sheduled maitenance tasks• Installation/Removal procedures• Troubleshooting
• Aiwothiness Limitation Section (ALS)
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Airworthiness Limitation Section (ALS)H25.4 Airworthiness Limitations section
(a) The Instructions for ContinuedAirworthiness must contain a section titledAirworthiness Limitations that is segregated andclearly distinguishable from the rest of thedocument. This section must set forth –
(1) Each mandatory replacementtime, structural inspection interval, andrelated structural inspection procedureapproved under CS 25.571: and (:…)
ALS
Life Limited Parts(Replacement
Time) CS 25.571 (*)
DamageTolerance Data
CS 25.571 (*)
(*) In other airworthiness codes Fatige & DT req.s may be specified in different Para.s (e.g. CS 23.571, 572, 573, 575)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 57
approved under CS 25.571: and (:…)
(3) Any mandatory replacement timeof EWIS components as defined in CS25.1701 (…)
(b) (…). This section must contain a legible statement in a prominent location that reads: ‘The Airworthiness Limitations Section is approved and variations must also be approved’.
EWIS(Replacement
Time) CS 25.1701
ALS is approved by EASA during Type Certificationand it is made mandatory by AD
EWIS – Electrical Wiring Interconnection System = any wire, wiring device, or combination of these, including termination devices, installed in any area of the aeroplanefor the purpose of transmitting electrical energy, including data and signals between two or more intended terminationpoints.
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Airworthiness Directives (AD)21.A.2B
• Document issued or adopted by EASA which mandates actions to be performed on an aircraft to restore an acceptable level of safety
• An AD is issued when:– an unsafe condition (ref. 21.A.3C) exists in an a/c, as a result of a
deficiencyin the a/c, engine, propeller, part or appliance installed; AND
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 58
deficiencyin the a/c, engine, propeller, part or appliance installed; AND– that condition is likely to exist or develop in other a/c
• The TCH shall– propose the appropriate corrective action or required inspectionsand
submit details to EASA for approval
– make available descriptive data and accomplishment instructions to those who are concerned
TCH=Type Certificate Holder
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Type Design Modification (or Changes)Part 21 Subpart D
Must comply with the applicable aiworthiness req.s
Minor Substantial New TC
21.A.91 21.A.19
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 59
Mod.
Minor
Major
Substantial New TC
SignificantCB updated to the latest Amdt at the time of Application
Not SignificantOriginal CB
(TCDS) or belowthe latest Amdt
Standard
21.A.101 21.A.90B TC=Type CertificateBdC=Base di Certificazione
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Substantial Changes21.A.19
A change which is so extensive that a substantially complete investigation of compliance with the applicable type-certification basis is required, and consequently a new type certificate
CS 25 Exemples
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 60
CS 25 Exemples– Change in the number or location of engines– Change from a high wing to low wing– Change from an all metal aeroplane to all composite primary structure– Change of empennage configuration (cruciform vs. ‘T’ or ‘V’ tail)– Increase from subsonic to supersonic flight regime
�New TC / TCDS required TC=Type CertificateTCDS=Type Certificate Data Sheet
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Minor Change21.A.91
• Do not have an «appreciableeffect» on- Mass & Balance- Structural strength- Reliability
Major Change21.A.91
• Non-Minor Modifications
• Only the TCH can apply for a Major Mod. approval
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 61
- Reliability- Operational characteristics- Noise, Fuel venting &
Exhaust emission- Operational Suitability Data - Other characteristics
affecting the airworthiness
• Any legal person can apply forMinor Mod. approval
• The TCH must hold a valid DOAor APDOA
TCH=Type Certificate HolderDOA=Design Organization ApprovalAPDOA=Alternative Procedure DOA
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
(Non Standard) Changes Classification ProcessGM 21.A.91
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 62
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Significant Changes21.A.101
It changes at the product level one or more of the following: 1) General configuration2) Principles of construction3) Assumptions used for certification
(but not to the extent to be considered a substantial change)
See ex. in Appendix A to GM 21.A.101
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 64
(but not to the extent to be considered a substantial change)
Must be considered in the context of all previous relevant design changes (ex. numerous slightly increments of MTOM)
CB impact: Must comply with the latest Amdt. of the rule, unle ss- it is impractical or - it does not contributes materially to the level of safety of the changed product
(little safety gain)
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Standard Changes21.A.90B
• Aeroplanes MTOM ≤ 5 700 kg
• Rotorcraft MTOM ≤ 3 175 kg
• ELA1 & ELA 2 (powered) sailplanes, balloons and airships
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 65
• ELA1 & ELA 2 (powered) sailplanes, balloons and airships
• Must comply with design data included in specific CS – acceptable methods– techniques and practices– ICA
ELA = European Light Aircraft (Rif. Art 1 Reg. (EU) 748/2012 as amended)ELA1 includes: non complex motor-powered aeroplane, Sailplane of MTOM ≤1200 kgELA2 includes: non complex motor-powered aeroplane, Sailplane MTOM ≤ 2000 kg, Very Light RotorcaftCS = Certification Specificatins issued by EASAICA = Istructions for Continued AirworthinessTCH = Type Certificate Holder
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
RepairsPart 21 Subart M
• Same classification of Modifications– Minor– Major– Standard
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 66
– Standard
• Must comply with the applicable airwothiness req.s
• Can be temporary
• The Applicant must hold a DOA or APDOA
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Permit To Flight (PTF)Part 21 Subpart P
• For a/c’s that do not (fully) comply with the applicable aiworthinessreq.s even if they are able to safely flight under specifiedconditions and limitations
• Specific scopes
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 67
• Limited time duration
• For single a/c only
• Pre-approved Flight Conditions needed
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
PTF main
Develop-ment
Showingcompliance
with CS
DO/PO Crew
TrainingProduction
flight testing
Production Ferry Flight
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 68
mainscopes
Production sites transfer
Customeracceptance
Delivering/Export
Exibitions/ Air Show
Market survey/ Customer crew
training21.A.701
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Application FC Approval(EASA/NAA)
ConformityInspection
(NAA)
PTF issuing(NAA)
PTF issuing processPart 21 Subpart P Config. as built = Config. as designed
+ accepted deviations
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 69
FC
Design Related
EASA Approval
Non Design Related
NAA Approval
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Configuration
Conditions & Limitations
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 70
FC21.A.707
Safety of Flight
Demosntation
ConfigurationControl
Procedure
EU REGULATION (PART 21)
Cofiguration
Conditions & Limitations
itineraries or
airspace
Flight crew
carriage of persons
other than flight crew
operating limitations procedures
technical conditions
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 71
FC21.A.707
Safety of Flight
Demonstration
ConfgurationControl
Demonstration
Flight test program
(if applicable)
Maintenance
REGULATION & SAFETY
What is an airworhiness code?
Technical req.s imposed to Type Design to assure a certain level of saftey
Regulations impose
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 73
Regulations impose increasing levels of severity assuringincreasing levels of safety
[Source: Internet- EASA Presentation for Workshop GA 14 Nov. 2014]
REGULATION & SAFETY
The practicability criterion
• We have diferent classes of products
• The severity imposed by a regulation is increased up to the levelwhere the sacrifice (cost) to be payed for implementation isgrossly disproportinate w.r.t. safety gain
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 74
COST
SA
FE
TY IMPRACTICAL
ALARP concept(As Low As ReasonablyPracticabe)
AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS
Main Certification Specifications (CS)
CS-VLA Very Light Aeroplanes
CS-VLR Very Light Rotorcrafts
CS-22 Sailplanes and Powered Sailplanes
CS-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic and Commuter Category Aeroplanes
CS-25 Large Aeroplanes
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 75
CS-27 Small Rotorcrafts
CS-29 Large Rotorcrafts
CS-34 Aircraft Engine Emissions and Fuel Venting
CS-36 Aircraft Noise
CS-E Engines
CS-P Propellers
AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS
• BOOK 1 – AIRWORTHINESS CODE
• SUBPART A – GENERAL
• SUBPART B – FLIGHT
• SUBPART C – STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS
• SUBPART D – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
Disciplines
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 77
• SUBPART E – POWERPLANT
• SUBPART F – EQUIPMENT
• SUBPART G – OPERATING LIMITATIONS AND INFORMATION
• APPENDICES
• BOOK 2 – ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE (AMC)
Disciplines
How quantitative Req.s are defined?
Ex. Stall velocity limitation for CS-23, CS-VLA a/c’s
• CS-23 limits the stall speed (hence the flight speed) to 61 KT for a Single Engine Arcraft
• This req. limits the ground impact velocity and hence the impact KE in case of a minor crash landing due the engine failure (engine off)
AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 78
case of a minor crash landing due the engine failure (engine off)
• CS-VLA limits the stall speed at lower (more conservative) value of 45 KT because it allows to intstall CS-22 less reliable engines which are expected to fail more often
The mean number of events inceases (engines fail more often) but the severity of each event deceases (the impact KE is lower) so that the risk
(hence the level of safety) remains the same in terms of expectedcasualties
CS 23.49 Stalling speed
(…)(c) Except as provided in sub-paragraph (d)of this paragraph, VSO at maximum weight must not exceed 113 km/h (61 knots) for –(1) Single-engined aeroplanes; and(2) Twin-engined aeroplanes of 2722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight that cannot meet the minimum rate of climb specified in CS 23.67 (a) (1) with the critical engine
CS 23.562 Emergency landing dynamic conditions
(…)(d)(1) The ultimate load factors of CS23.561(b) must be increased by multiplying the load factors by the square of the ratio of the increased stall speed to 113 km/h (61 knots). (…)
AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 79
CS 23.67 (a) (1) with the critical engineinoperative.(d) All single-engined aeroplanes, and thosetwin-engined aeroplanes of 2722 kg (6 000 lb) or less maximum weight, with a VSO of more than 113 km/h (61 knots) at maximum weight that do not meet the requirements of CS 23.67(a)(1), must comply with CS 23.562(d)
UAS REQUIREMENTS
JARUS
Joint Authorities for Rulmaking
on Unmanned Aircfat Systems
(54 Member States)
JARUS CS-LURS – Rotary wing - MTOW<750 kg
[Source: Internet – JARUS Web Site]
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 80
JARUS CS-LUAS – Fixed wing - MTOW < 750 kg
JARUS CS-UAS – Every config. - MTOM < 750 kg –
performance based (under development)
UAS REQUIREMENTS
New safety philosophy
• UAS = UA + GCS (RPAS = RPA + RPS)
• No occupants onboard (…for the time being…)
• Third parties (on ground, in air, at sea) & critical infrastructures ’ safety
• May be complex irrespective to the MTOM
UAS = Unmanned Aircraft System (include sistemi autonomi)RPAS = Remote Piloted Aircfat SystemUA = Unmanned AircraftGCS = Ground control StationRPS = Remote Pilot StationC2 = Command and Control (data link)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 81
• May be complex irrespective to the MTOM
• C2 Function ?
[Source: CS-LUAS Book 2]
UAS REQUIREMENTS
UAS Risk-Based classification
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 82
C - CERTIFIEDB - SPECIFICA - OPEN
[Source: JARUS]
UAS REQUIREMENTS
Some UAS req.s
• FCS envelope protection(CS LUAS/LURS.23, 1329)
• ERC (Emergency Recovery Capability)(CS LUAS/LURS.1412, .561)
[Source: CS-LUAS Book 2]
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 83
- Automatic pre-programmed procedure to reach a pre-definedumpopulated forced landing area
- FTS (Flight Termination System)
• RPS new «product» eligible for a TC (CS LUAS Subpart I)
FCS=Flight Control System
PERFORMANCE BASED REGULATION
The new CS/FAR 23 and CS-UASCS 23 Amdt 5 & JARUS CS-UAS
What we had ….[Source: Internet]
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 84
Gross differences : performances | complexity | tecno logy | operations[Source: EASA CS-25 Amdt 5 NPA]
PERFORMANCE BASED REGULATION
Problems with traditional approach
• Relation between MTOM vs Complexity
• Very detailed (prescriptive) design-related req.s
• Not always aligned with technology development (UAS, composites, Complex HW & SW, glass cockpit…)
MT
OM
CS 25, CS 29
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 85
• Special Conditions needed (Slow and complex certification process)
• Innovation could not be promptly supported
• Req.s may be to demanding for low performance a/c
PERFORMANCE & COMPLEXITY
CS 23 Amdt 5
PERFORMANCE BASED REGULATION
The solution (?)
High level performance based objectiverequiriments
The Applicant may developdetailed de to comply with the objective req.s
ADS – Aiworhiness Design Standards (EASA Approved)
ANNEX 8 ICAO
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 86
Standards (EASA Approved)
CS 23 Amdt. 4 is an approved ADS
DesignReq.
MOC ADS
[Source: EASA CS-25 Amdt 5 NPA]
DESIGN CAPABILITY
To apply for a TC the Applicant must shown its design capability
21.A.14
TCRTC
DOA Part 21 Subpart J
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 88
DOA =Design Organization Approval, AP-DOA = Alternative Procedure DOA , ELA = European Light Aircraft
ELA2ELA 2 Engine/Propeller
Piston EngineFixed or adjustable pitch propeller
APDOAAd hoc procedures linked to
specific projects
ELA1ELA 1 Engine/Propeller Certification Program
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
joint exercise
Applicant Certification Team&
EASA Certification Team
Type Certification Process
Does notintervene in the design phase
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 89
EASA Certification Team
Demonsnrates the compliance with the CB
req.s
Estabishes the CB and verifies that the Applicant has complied with the CB
req.s
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Preliminar Phases
Application(Applicant)
EASA PCM designation
PCM=Project Certification ManagerPID=Progect Information DocumentToR=Terms of Reference
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 90
EASA CertificationTeam of Experts
(per discipline)
Project Information Document (PID)
(with the ToR)
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase IPhase II
CertificationPhase III
Compliance
Phase IVFinal Report
Certification process : 4 phases
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 91
FamiliarizationCertification
ProgramCompliance
demonstration
Final Report and TC issuing
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase IPhase II
CertificationPhase III
Compliance
Phase IVFinal Report
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 92
FAmiliarizationCertification
ProgramCompliance
demonstration
Final Report and TC issuing
[Source: Internet]
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase I
Technical Familiarisation and establishment of the
Type Certification Basis
- Certification Team gathers information on the
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 93
- Certification Team gathers information on the
projects
- Agreement of the Certification Basis
CRI A-1CRI = Certification Review Item
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Certification Basis
It is the set of detailed technical requirements of Airworthiness,
Environmental Protection and Operational Suitability Data, which assure
that the Type Design complies with the Essential Requirements
Basic Regulation
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 94
Basic Regulation
Art. 20
1.(a) certification basis consists of the applicable airworthiness code, the provisions
for which an equivalent level of safety has been accepted and the special
detailed technical specifications necessary when the design features of a
particular product or the experience in operation render any of the
airworthiness code provisions inadequate or inappropriate to ensure
conformity with essential requirements
OSD=Operational Suitability Data
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Certification Basis structure21.A.17A, 21.A.17B, 21.A.18
CERTIFICATION BASIS
AW Req.s21.A.17A
ODS Operational Suitability Data
21.A.17B
Environmental ProtectionReq.s
21.A.18
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 95
CS SC
ELOSArt 20(a) BR
FCD CCD
SIMD MCSD
MMEL SC
NoiseCS-36
Engine Emissions& Fuel Venting
CS-34
BR = Basic regulation
CS – Certification Specifications
SC = Special Conditions
ELOS – Equivalent Level Of Safety
FCD – Flight Crew Data
CCD – Cabin Crew Data
SIMD – Simulator Data
MCSD - Maintenance Certifyng Staff Data
MMEL – Master Minimum Equipment List
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Operational Suitability Data (OSD)
21.A.23
• OSD are data important for the safety of operations
- Pilot training (FCD)- Maintenance staff qualification (MCSD)- Simulator qualification (SIM)- Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 96
- Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL)- Type specific data for cabin crew (CCD)
• Approved as an integral part of the TC
TC = AW + EP + OSD • Can be either mandatory or recommended
(NAA can mandate those recommended) NAA=National Aviation Authority
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Special Conditions (SC)21.A.16B
• Ad hoc specific technical req.s set by the Agency when the applicable CS does not contain adequate AW standards for
- Novelties (w.r.t. the CS assumpions)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 97
- Non conventional use
- Unsafe conditions (from experience or similar products)
• Must assure a level of safety equivalent to the applicable CS
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS)Art 20(1)(a) BR, 21.A.21(c)(2)
“Any airworthiness provisions not complied with are compensated for by factors that provide an equivalent level of safety”
DeviationsEASA MB Decision 12-2007 – Products Certification Procedures
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 98
EASA MB Decision 12-2007 – Products Certification Procedures
• Used in certification practice when some part of the design cannot comply with the applicable CS and such a deviation does not qualify for an ELOS
• In order for a product to be eligible for a standard TC, any deviation must ensure conformity with the essential requirements
• Otherwise, the aircraft would only be eligible for a restricted type certificate (RTC)
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
CS
Level of safety
ER
FULL CS COMPLIANCE
ELOS
OPERTIONAL CONDITIONS & LIMITATIONS
DEVIATIONS
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 99
Standard TC Restricted TC CS=Certification SpecificationsER=Essential RequirementsELOS=Equivalent Level Of Safety
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Changed Product Certification BasisGM 21.A.101
“TOP DOWN APPROACH “
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 100
yes
yes
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase IPhase II
CertificationPhase III
Compliance
Phase IVFinal Report
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 102
FamiliarizzazioneCertification
ProgramCompliance
demonstration
Final Report and TC issuing
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase II
Agreement of the Certification Programme
- Agreement on the Means of Compliance (MOC)
used for each CB Req
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 103
used for each CB Req
- Level of Involvement (LOI) of the Certification
Team
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Certification Programme21.A.20(b), AMC to 21.A.20(b)
“The applicant shall provide the Agency with a certification programme detailing the means for compliance demonstration . This document shall be updated as necessary during the certification process.”
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 104
• Project and operations description• Means of Compliance (MOC)• Compliance Check List (CCL)• Identification of the personnel having a decision role on AW, OSD, EP • Planning
MOC=Menas of ComplaianceCCL=Complaicne Check ListAW=AirwothinessOSD=Operational Suitability DataEP=Environmental Protection
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Level of Involment (LoI)EASA Opinion No 07/2016
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 107
Source: EASA Presentation “EASA Level of Involment (LOI) project”, Oct. 2015
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase IPhase II
CertificationPhase III
Compliance
PhaseIVFinal Report
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 108
FamiliarizzazioneCertification
ProgramCompliance
demonstration
Final Report and TC issue
[Source: Internet]
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase III
Compliance determination
- Demonstration & Verification (Applicant)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 109
- Verification based on LoI (certification Team)
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase IPhase II
CertificationPhase III
Compliance
Phase IVFinal Report
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 110
FamiliarizzazioneCertification
ProgramCompliance
demonstration
Final Report and TC issuing
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
Phase IV
Final Report and issue of a Type Certificate
- Declaration of Compliance (Applicant)
- Statements of Satisfaction (Team Experts)
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 111
- Type Certification Board Meeting (Applicant &
Cert. Team)
- Final Report (PCM)
- Type Certificate issuing (EASA)
CM(Policy)
CRI
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
CM – Certification MemorandumCRI – Certification Review ItemCAI – Certification Action itemCM – Certification Memorandum
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 112
TypeCertification
Tools
CRI
CAI
CM(Policy)
CRI
TYPE CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
BdCCRI A-1 MOC
ELOS / Deviations
Giovanni Di Antonio 2017Pag. 113
CRI
CAI
TypeCertification
Tools
ControversialIssues
Thank youfor your attention
Pag. 114
for your attention
The information contained in this presentation is intended for educational purpose only, it exclusively refect the Author’s ideasand point of view and in some parts may not be completely updated. The content of this presentation has not been formallyendorsed neither by the Italian Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) nor by the European Aviation Agency (EASA) or other Civil
Aviation Authorities. Any implementation of the approaches and methodologies exposed in ths presentation remains under the complete responsibility of the implementer.