an ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter mmic with series and parallel lc circuits
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2446 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 49, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2001
An Ultra-Broad-Band Reflection-Type Phase-ShifterMMIC With Series and ParallelLC Circuits
Kenichi Miyaguchi, Member, IEEE, Morishige Hieda, Member, IEEE, Kazuhiko Nakahara, Member, IEEE,Hitoshi Kurusu, Masatoshi Nii, Michiaki Kasahara, Tadashi Takagi, Member, IEEE, and
Shuji Urasaki, Senior Member, IEEE
Abstract—An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase shifteris proposed. Theoretically, the proposed phase shifter has fre-quency-independent characteristics in the case of 180phaseshift. The phase shifter is composed of a 3-dB hybrid couplerand a pair of novel reflective terminating circuits. The reflectiveterminating circuit switches two states of series and parallelLCcircuits. Using an ideal circuit model without parasitic circuitelements, we have derived the determining condition of frequencyindependence of circuit elements. Extending the concept, we canalso obtain a broad-band phase shifter for other phase differenceas well. In this case, for a given phase difference and an operatingfrequency, we also derive a condition to obtain minimum variationof phase difference around the operating frequency. This enablesthe broad-band characteristics for arbitrary phase difference.The fabricated 180 reflective terminating circuit monolithicmicrowave integrated circuit (MMIC) has achieved a phase differ-ence of 183 3 over 0.5–30 GHz. The 180phase-shifter MMIChas demonstrated a phase shift of 187 7 over 0.5–20 GHz. The90 reflective terminating circuit MMIC has performed a phasedifference of 93 7 over 4–12 GHz.
Index Terms—Broad-band, MMIC, monolithic microwave inte-grated circuit, phase shifter, reflection type.
I. INTRODUCTION
PHASE shifters have been widely used in active phased-array antennas (APAAs) for electronic beam steering [1].
Recently, broad-band APAAs have been required in wide-bandmicrowave applications. According to the demand of wide-bandAPAAs, broad-band phase shifters have been developed [2]–[5].In this paper, we propose an ultra-broad-band reflection-typephase shifter with new reflective terminating circuits. The con-ventional reflection-type phase shifter, which consists of a 3-dBhybrid coupler and a pair of reflective terminating circuits withimpedance transformers, is able to be operated in a relativelywide frequency range. However, it still has a restriction of op-erating bandwidth because of poor frequency characteristics ofthe impedance transformers [6].
Manuscript received March 30, 2001; revised August 21, 2001.K. Miyaguchi, M. Hieda, M. Kasahara, T. Takagi, and S. Urasaki are with the
Information Technology Research and Development Center, Mitsubishi ElectricCorporation, Kamakura 247-8501, Japan.
K. Nakahara is with Kamakura Works, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Ka-makura 247-8520, Japan.
H. Kurusu is with the High Frequency and Optical Semiconductor Division,Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Itami 664-8641, Japan.
M. Nii is with the Communication Systems Center, Mitsubishi Electric Cor-poration, Amagasaki 661-8661, Japan.
Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9480(01)10444-8.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a reflection-type phase shifter.
The proposed phase shifter is composed of a broad-band3-dB hybrid coupler and a pair of novel reflective terminatingcircuits. Theoretically, it has frequency-independent character-istics in the case of 180phase shift. The reflective terminatingcircuit switches two states of series and parallelLC circuits.Using an ideal circuit model without parasitic circuit elements,we have derived the determining condition of frequency inde-pendence of circuit elements. Extending the concept, we canalso obtain a broad-band phase shifter for other phase differenceas well. In this case, for a given phase difference and an oper-ating frequency, we also derive a condition to obtain minimumvariation of phase difference around the operating frequency.This enables the broad-band characteristics for arbitrary phasedifference. The 180and 90 reflective terminating circuits’monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) and the 180reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC have been designed andfabricated by 0.5-m pseudomorphic high electron-mobilitytransistor (pHEMT) MMIC technology. The 180reflectiveterminating circuit MMIC has achieved a phase difference of183 3 over 0.5–30 GHz. The 180phase-shifter MMIC hasdemonstrated a phase shift of 1877 over 0.5–20 GHz. The90 reflective terminating circuit MMIC has performed a phasedifference of 93 7 over 4–12 GHz.
II. NOVEL REFLECTIVE TERMINATING CIRCUIT
A. 180 Phase-Difference Case
Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a reflection-type phaseshifter. It consists of a broad-band 3-dB hybrid coupler and apair of reflective terminating circuits. Fig. 2 shows a schematicdiagram of a novel reflective terminating circuit. andcorrespond to inductor and capacitor of the seriesLC circuit,while and are the inductance and capacitance of the par-allel LC circuit, respectively. The reflective terminating circuitswitches series and parallelLC circuits by switching the circuit.
0018–9480/01$10.00 © 2001 IEEE
![Page 2: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MIYAGUCHI et al.: ULTRA-BROAD-BAND REFLECTION-TYPE PHASE-SHIFTER MMIC WITH SERIES AND PARALLELLC CIRCUITS 2447
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of a novel reflective terminating circuit.
Reflection coefficients and of series and parallelLCcircuits are given by
(1)
(2)
where
(3)
(4)
In (1)–(4), and are the impedance of series and parallelLC circuits and and are the reflection phase of series andparallelLC circuits, respectively. is the impedance of a 3-dBhybrid coupler. Using (1) and (2), and can be written as
(5)
(6)
The phase difference is defined by the following equation:
(7)
In order to obtain broad-band phase difference characteris-tics, has to satisfy the following condition for all frequencies:
for all (8)
Substituting (7) into (8), we can obtain the following polyno-mial equation:
(9)
The coefficients of all terms with respect tohave to be zeroto satisfy (9) for all . We can then derive the determining con-dition as follows:
(10)
Substituting (10) into (7) leads to
(11)
As a result, it has been shown that only an 180phase dif-ference is obtained without frequency dependence by satisfyingthe determining condition of (10).
B. Non-180 Phase-Difference Case
Next, we derive the condition in the case of non-180phase-difference over a broad bandwidth. To yield a broad-bandphase difference characteristics, it is required to satisfy condi-tions as follows :
(12)
(13)
Substituting (7) into (12), we obtain the following equations:
(14)
(15)
From (7) and (13), we obtain the following equations:
(16)
(17)
![Page 3: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2448 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 49, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2001
To reduce (14)–(17) to solvable forms, we introduce the con-ditions as follows:
(18)
(19)
(20)
Equation (18) corresponds to the condition thatat is thephase difference between the series circuit as a shorttermination and parallel circuit . Equation (19) corre-sponds to the condition thatat is the phase difference be-tween the series circuit and parallel circuit asan open termination. The is the center frequency of and
.We can then reduce (14) and (15) to the following equations:
(21)
(22)
Equations (21) and (22) can be rewritten as follows:
(23)
(24)
Finally, we obtain solvable forms of (14) and (15) as follows:
(25)
(26)
We also reduce (16) and (17) to solvable forms as follows:
(27)
Let be the coefficient of (27). From (20) and (27),and are expressed as follows:
(28)
(29)
Fig. 3. Ideal phase-difference characteristics of the reflective terminatingcircuit.
The circuit elements , , , and are then given asfollows:
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
Therefore, the circuit elements have been expressed as func-tions of and . Substituting (30)–(33) with (7), it is easilyshown that is a function of . The ideal phase-differencecharacteristics versus normalized frequency are plottedin Fig. 3. In the case of a 90phase difference, the phase-differ-ence variation is less than 1.17over to , where andare and , respectively.
III. D ESIGN
A. 180 Reflective-Terminating-Circuit MMIC
Fig. 4 shows a schematic diagram of the proposed 180reflec-tive terminating circuit. It consists of only a few circuit elementsof built-in inductor , built-in capacitor , and a pair of FET1and FET2. These FETs are used as switching elements.
Fig. 5 shows equivalent circuits of parallel and seriesLCstates of the 180reflective terminating circuit, respectively.
and are the on-state resistances of FET1 and FET2,respectively. and are the off-capacitances of FET1and FET2, respectively. In parallelLC state operation, FET1and FET2 are turned on, as shown in Fig. 5(a). By neglecting
and , the circuit can be simplified to a parallelLCcircuit, which corresponds to the parallel resonant circuit of
in Fig. 2. In seriesLC state operation, FET1 and FET2are pinched off, as shown in Fig. 5(b). When the admittance ofa series capacitance combination consisting ofand is
![Page 4: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MIYAGUCHI et al.: ULTRA-BROAD-BAND REFLECTION-TYPE PHASE-SHIFTER MMIC WITH SERIES AND PARALLELLC CIRCUITS 2449
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of proposed 180� reflective terminating circuit.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5. Equivalent circuits of parallel and seriesLC states of 180� reflectiveterminating circuit. (a) ParallelLC state. (b) SeriesLC state.
small enough to be neglected, the circuit can be simplified to aseriesLC circuit, which corresponds to the series resonant cir-cuit of in Fig. 2. Therefore, Fig. 4 can be identical toFig. 2 provided that plays the role of and simultane-ously. From (10), , and must be equal to . Wehave the determining condition for the circuit shown in Fig. 4.When the resonant frequency of the parallel and the seriesLCcircuits is set to be , the circuit elements of andare determined uniquely as follows:
(34)
(35)
However, the parallelLC state has a return loss that is deter-mined by nonzero and . The return-loss increase inthe parallelLC state particularly appears at . Therefore, theparasitic resistances of FETs place a constraint on the operatingbandwidth. has to be optimally determined larger than theoperating bandwidth. From (34) and (35), the values ofand
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of a proposed 90� reflective terminating circuit.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 7. Equivalent circuits of parallel and seriesLC states of 90� reflectiveterminating circuit. (a) ParallelLC state. (b) SeriesLC state.
are 0.23 nH and 0.09 pF under the assumption ofand GHz.
B. 90 Reflective Terminating Circuit MMIC
Fig. 6 shows a schematic diagram of a proposed 90reflectiveterminating circuit. It consists of two inductors, two capacitors,and their FETs. These FETs are used as switching elements.
Fig. 7 shows equivalent circuits of parallel and seriesLCstates of the 90reflective terminating circuit, respectively.
and are the on-state resistances of FET1,FET2, and FET3, respectively. and are theoff-capacitances of FET1, FET2, and FET3, respectively. InparallelLC state operation, FET2 is pinched off and FET1 andFET3 are turned on, as shown in Fig. 7(a). In the conditionthat and can be neglected, the circuitcan be simplified to a parallelLC circuit, which correspondsto the parallel resonant circuit of in Fig. 2. In seriesLC state operation, FET1 and FET3 are pinched off andFET2 is turned on, as shown in Fig. 7(b). In the conditionthat and can be neglected,the circuit can be simplified to a seriesLC circuit, whichcorresponds to the series resonant circuit of in Fig. 2.The FET size was determined so as to equalize the return lossof the series and parallelLC states due to smalland . From (30)–(33), the values of and
![Page 5: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2450 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 49, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2001
Fig. 8. Fabricated 180� reflective terminating circuit MMIC.
Fig. 9. Phase-difference performance of the 180� reflective terminating circuitMMIC.
Fig. 10. Return-loss performance of the 180� reflective terminating circuitMMIC.
are 0.68 nH, 3.26 pF, 2.19 nH, and 0.073 pF, respectively, underthe assumption of and GHz. and
are GHz and GHz, respectively.
IV. M EASUREDRESULTS
A. 180 Reflective Terminating Circuit and Phase-ShifterMMIC
Fig. 8 depicts a photograph of a fabricated 180reflectiveterminating circuit MMIC. The integrated circuit (IC) has beenfabricated by using 0.5-m pHEMT technology. To equalizethe return loss between parallel and seriesLC states, a resistor
Fig. 11. 180� phase-shifter MMIC.
Fig. 12. Phase-shift performance of the 180� phase-shifter MMIC.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 13. Insertion- and return-loss performance of the 180� phase-shifterMMIC (a) ParallelLC state. (b) SeriesLC state.
is incorporated between source and drain terminals of FET1.That resistor has a negligible effect on phase difference andimpedance of the circuit. Fig. 9 shows the simulated andmeasured phase-difference characteristics of the 180reflectiveterminating circuit MMIC. Fig. 10 shows the return-loss
![Page 6: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MIYAGUCHI et al.: ULTRA-BROAD-BAND REFLECTION-TYPE PHASE-SHIFTER MMIC WITH SERIES AND PARALLELLC CIRCUITS 2451
Fig. 14. Fabricated 90� reflective terminating circuit MMIC.
Fig. 15. Phase-difference performance of the 90� reflective terminating circuitMMIC.
characteristics. Both of the measured and simulated results arein good agreement. The measured phase difference is 1833over 0.5–30 GHz, and the measured return loss is 2.30.4 dBover 0.5–20 GHz.
Fig. 11 presents an ultra-broad-band 180reflection-typephase-shifter MMIC fabricated by the same process. It con-sists of a 3-dB Lange coupler and a pair of 180reflectiveterminating circuits. Fig. 12 shows the measured and simulatedphase-shift characteristics of the phase-shifter MMIC. Fig. 13shows the measured and simulated loss characteristics. Themeasured phase shift is 1877 over 0.5–20 GHz. Themeasured insertion loss is 3.70.6 dB over 6–20 GHz andthe measured insertion-loss error between parallel and seriesLC states is less than 1 dB at the same frequency range. Thedifference between the measured and simulated phase shift ismainly due to differences between the model parameter andmeasured data of a 3-dB Lange coupler used in it.
B. 90 Reflective Terminating Circuit MMIC
Fig. 14 depicts a photograph of a 90reflective terminatingcircuit MMIC fabricated by the same process. Fig. 15 showsthe simulated and measured phase-difference characteristicsof the 90 reflective terminating circuit MMIC. Fig. 16 showsthe return-loss characteristics. The measured phase differenceis 93 7 over 4–12 GHz, and the measured return loss is
Fig. 16. Return-loss performance of the 90� reflective terminating circuitMMIC.
1.95 0.7 dB at the same frequency range. The difference be-tween the measured and simulated phase difference are mainlycaused by differences between the measured and simulatedFET characteristics used in it.
V. CONCLUSIONS
We have presented an ultra-broad-band reflection-type phaseshifter, which is composed of a broad-band 3-dB hybrid cou-pler and a pair of novel reflective terminating circuits. Theo-retically, the proposed phase shifter has frequency-independentcharacteristics in the case of a 180phase shift. The reflectiveterminating circuit switches two states of series and parallelLCcircuits. Using an ideal circuit model without parasitic circuit el-ements, we have derived the determining condition of circuit el-ements for frequency independence. Extending the concept, wecan also obtain a broad-band phase shifter for other phase dif-ferences as well. For a given phase difference and an operatingfrequency, we also have derived a condition to obtain minimumvariation of phase difference around the operating frequency.The fabricated 180reflective terminating circuit MMIC hasachieved a phase difference of 1833 over 0.5–30 GHz. Thefabricated 180phase-shifter MMIC utilizing the reflective ter-minating circuits has successfully demonstrated a phase shiftof 187 7 over 0.5–20 GHz. The fabricated 90reflective ter-minating circuit MMIC has performed a phase difference of93 7 over 4–12 GHz.
REFERENCES
[1] R. V. Garver, “Broad-band diode phase shifters,”IEEE Trans. Mi-crowave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-20, pp. 314–323, May 1972.
[2] J. P. Starski, “Optimization of the matching network for a hybrid couplerphase shifter,”IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-25, pp.662–666, Aug. 1977.
[3] M. Schindler, Y. Ayasli, A. Morris, and L. Hanes, “Monolithic 6–18 GHz3-bit phase shifter,” inIEEE GaAs IC Symp. Dig., 1985, pp. 129–132.
[4] D. C. Boire, J. E. Dejenford, and M. Cohn, “A 4.5 to 18 GHz phaseshifter,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., 1985, pp. 601–604.
[5] D. C. Boire, G. St. Onge, C. Barratt, G. B. Norris, and A. Moysenko,“4 : 1 bandwidth digital five bit MMIC phase shifters,” inIEEEMicrowave Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symp. Dig., 1989, pp.69–73.
[6] H. A. Atwater, “Reflection coefficient transformations for phase-shiftcircuits,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-28, pp.563–567, June 1980.
![Page 7: An ultra-broad-band reflection-type phase-shifter MMIC with series and parallel LC circuits](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022080111/575076891a28abdd2e9f0852/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2452 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 49, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2001
Kenichi Miyaguchi (M’00) received the B.E. andM.E. degrees in electrical and electronic engineeringfrom Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, in 1997 and1999, respectively.
In 1999, he joined the Information Technology Re-search and Development Center, Mitsubishi ElectricCorporation, Kamakura, Japan, where he has beenengaged in research and development of microwavecontrol circuits and MMICs.
Mr. Miyaguchi is a member of the Institute of Elec-tronics, Information and Communication Engineers
(IEICE), Japan.
Morishige Hieda (M’94) was born in Toyoma,Japan. He received the B.E. and M.E. degrees inelectronic engineering from Tohoku University,Sendai, Japan, in 1988 and 1990, respectively.
In 1990, he joined the Information TechnologyResearch and Development Center, MitsubishiElectric Corporation, Kamakura, Japan, where hehas been engaged in research and development ofmillimeter-wave mixers, microwave control circuits,and MMICs.
Mr. Hieda is a member of the Institute of Elec-tronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE), Japan.
Kazuhiko Nakahara (M’01) received the B.S. andPh.D. degrees in electronics from Hokkaido Univer-sity, Sapporo, Japan, in 1983 and 2001, respectively.
In 1983, he joined the Mitsubishi Electric Cor-poration, Kamakura, Japan, where he was engagedin research and development of microwave ICs andMMICs. He is currently with Kamakura Works,Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Kamakura, Japan.
Dr. Nakahara is a member of the Institute of Elec-tronics, Information and Communication Engineers(IEICE), Japan.
Hitoshi Kurusu received the B.E. and M.E. degreesin electrical and electronic engineering from KyotoUniversity, Kyoto, Japan, in 1994 and 1996, respec-tively.
In 1996, he joined the High Frequency and OpticalSemiconductor Division, Mitsubishi Electric Corpo-ration, Itami, Japan, where he has been engaged inresearch and development of microwave control cir-cuits and MMICs.
Masatoshi Nii received the B.E. and M.E. degrees inelectronic and electrical engineering from FukuokaUniversity, Fukuoka, Japan, in 1989 and 1991, re-spectively.
In 1991, he joined the Communication SystemsCenter, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Amagasaki,Japan, where he has been engaged in the develop-ment of microwave modules, microwave circuits,and MMICs.
Mr. Nii is a member of the Institute of Electronics,Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE),
Japan.
Michiaki Kasahara received the B.E. degreein electrical engineering from the University ofElectro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan, in 1985.
In 1985, he joined the Information Technology Re-search and Development Center, Mitsubishi ElectricCorporation, Kamakura, Japan, where he has beenengaged in development of RF equipment for radarsystems
Mr. Kasahara is a member of the Institute of Elec-tronics, Information and Communication Engineers(IEICE), Japan.
Tadashi Takagi (M’92) received the B.S. degreein physics from the Tokyo Institute of Technology,Tokyo, Japan, in 1973, and Ph.D. degree in electronicengineering from Shizuoka University, Sizuoka,Japan, in 1995.
In 1973, he joined the Mitsubishi ElectricCorporation, Kamakura, Japan, where he wasengaged in research and development of microwavecircuits and MMICs and solid-state power amplifiers(SSPAs). He is currently the Project Manager ofthe Microwave Prototyping Project Group, Infor-
mation Technology Research and Development Center, Mitsubishi ElectricCorporation.
Dr. Takagi is a member of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Com-munication Engineers (IEICE), Japan.
Shuji Urasaki (M’82–SM’94) received the B.S.,M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electronic engineeringfrom Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, in 1967,1969, and 1985, respectively.
In 1969, he joined the Mitsubishi ElectricCorporation, Tokyo, Japan, where he was involvedwith antennas for public communications, satellitecommunications, and radar systems. He is currentlythe General Manager of the Electro-Optics andMicrowave Systems Laboratory, InformationTechnology Research and Development Center,
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Kamakura, Japan.Dr. Urasaki is a member of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Com-
munication Engineers (IEICE), Japan.