analysis and comparison of awesome detected vlf perturbations

14
Analysis and Comparison of AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations S. NAITAMOR 1 , M. A. ALABDOADAIM 2 1 Centre de Recherche en Astronomie Astrophysique et Géophysique-Alegria. 2- Department of Physics, Sebha University-Libya

Upload: devika

Post on 11-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Analysis and Comparison of AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations. S. NAITAMOR 1 , M. A. ALABDOADAIM 2. 1 Centre de Recherche en Astronomie Astrophysique et Géophysique-Alegria . 2- Department of Physics, Sebha University-Libya. Outline. Analysis of Algeria AWESOME results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Analysis and Comparison of AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

S. NAITAMOR1, M. A. ALABDOADAIM2

1 Centre de Recherche en Astronomie Astrophysique et Géophysique-Alegria.2- Department of Physics, Sebha University-Libya

Page 2: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Outline

Analysis of Algeria AWESOME results

Association between TLEs and Early VLF signal perturbations Are TLEs the unique cause of early VLF perturbations?

Comparison between Algeria and Libya AWESOME results

Can we observe an Early event by distant receiver ?

Conclusions

Page 3: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

12-13 October EventsSprite at 22:51:35 (36.59N 3.32E)Sprite at 23:04:41 (38.06N 3.83E)

Elves at 00:32:00

Page 4: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Direct Paths Scattered Path

Tons=198ms

Tons= 180

Page 5: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Direct Paths

Scattered Paths

Circles Lightning near to the Elves time

Tons = 180ms

Tons = 120 ms

Page 6: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

October 17-18 eventsSprite at 21:28:27 (40.1N 4.55E) Sprite at 20:59:32 (39.98N 4.51E)

Page 7: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Tons = 600ms

Tons = 330ms

Tons = 600ms

Tons = 300ms

Page 8: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Sprite at 01:43:59

17-18 December events

Sprite at 23:09:48

The events were well situated for multi frequencies observations

17/12/200718/12/2007

Page 9: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Sprite at 23:09:48

Tons = 48ms

Tons=258ms

Tons= 40ms

Page 10: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Sprite at 01:43:59

Tons = 198ms

Tons = 138ms

Tons = 318ms

Page 11: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

Last TLE was at 03:54:25 234mn after 00:00

No TLE was observed during this time interval

Are TLEs the unique sources of VLF signal perturbations ?

What could be the sources of these perturbations ?

Page 12: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations
Page 13: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

No Signal perturbation was observed by the receiver at Sebha even though the CG locations were near the GCPs from HWU, GQD and NRK to Sebha

What about the distant receiver data ?

Page 14: Analysis  and Comparison of  AWESOME Detected VLF Perturbations

• Near receiver results showed that Early VLF perturbation due to TLE may have different scattering process.

• The scattering process plays an important role in determining the onset time and the amplitude of the VLF signal perturbation.

• In absence of TLEs, supplementary ionization can occur due to Lightning discharges which can affect the VLF signal.

• Sebha (Libya) AWESOME receiver results showed clearly that not all the VLF perturbations survived the long distance to the receiver, event if the activity is close to the GCP.

Conclusion