analysis and interpretation of dairy co-operative unions...

78
155 Chapter No. 5 Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions in Satara District. 5.1 Introduction: This chapter forms the major part of the present study highlighting the brief profile of various co-operative unions under study and dealing with analysis and the interpretation of the data collection pertaining to the study. This chapter is important one as the conclusions and the findings of the study are based on analysis and interpretation of the data. This chapter is presented in two parts i.e. A) The profile of six selected dairy co-operative unions in the district on the basis of various key factors like location, year of establishment, daily milk collection, sale of milk, computerization etc. B) Financial analysis of the unions selected for the comparative study. A: Organizational Setup: The chart 5.1 highlights the organizational setup of the co-operative unions in the district. The members (primary dairy co-operative societies and other co-operative societies) are the real owners of the union and they are supreme body of co-operative union. The responsibility for the day to day administration and management is entrusted with the board of directors who are the representative of the members. The directors so elected are accountable for their performances to the members. They are also responsible for making policy decisions to implement the resolution passed by the members in the annual general meeting (AGM). They are also responsible for the overall development of the union. The responsibility for the day to day operation and implementation of policy decision is interested with one of the member of the director elected as chairman and who is assisted by the vice chairman. Directors make the policy decisions through there board meetings. The

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

155

Chapter No. 5

Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions

in Satara District.

5.1 Introduction:

This chapter forms the major part of the present study highlighting the

brief profile of various co-operative unions under study and dealing with

analysis and the interpretation of the data collection pertaining to the study.

This chapter is important one as the conclusions and the findings of the study

are based on analysis and interpretation of the data. This chapter is presented in

two parts i.e.

A) The profile of six selected dairy co-operative unions in the district on

the basis of various key factors like location, year of establishment, daily

milk collection, sale of milk, computerization etc.

B) Financial analysis of the unions selected for the comparative study.

A: Organizational Setup:

The chart 5.1 highlights the organizational setup of the co-operative

unions in the district. The members (primary dairy co-operative societies and

other co-operative societies) are the real owners of the union and they are

supreme body of co-operative union. The responsibility for the day to day

administration and management is entrusted with the board of directors who

are the representative of the members. The directors so elected are accountable

for their performances to the members. They are also responsible for making

policy decisions to implement the resolution passed by the members in the

annual general meeting (AGM). They are also responsible for the overall

development of the union. The responsibility for the day to day operation and

implementation of policy decision is interested with one of the member of the

director elected as chairman and who is assisted by the vice chairman.

Directors make the policy decisions through there board meetings. The

Page 2: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

156

following organization chart through light on the overall organization structure

of the union

Organization Chart :

Manager is administrative head. He has to inform all important

development of the union to the Board of Directors. He has to supervise the

work of subordinate staff and maintain good relation with directors and

employees. He has to work as mediator between board of directors and the

employees.

5.2 A) Dairy Co-operative unions in the district: A profile

The six dairy co-operative unions presently works in the district are

1. Khandala Taluka Sahakari Dudh Puravata Sangh Ltd. Shirval Tal-

Khandala

2. Koyana Sahkari Dudh Utpadak Prakriya Sangh Ltd. Karad

3. Javali Taluka Dudh Puravata Sangh Ltd Medha, Tal Javali

4. Patan Taluka Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd. Patan

5. Phaltan Taluka Sahkari Dudh Puravata Sangh Ltd. Phantan

6. Shivshambhu Sahakari Dudh Purvatha Sangh Ltd Doulatnagar Tal -

Patan .

The following table highlights a brief profile of the above unions on the

basis of certain key variables like year of establishment, command area,

number of primary co-operative societies as member, own building and

computerization activities etc.

Page 3: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

157

Page 4: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

158

Page 5: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

159

Table No. 5.1

Dairy Co-operative Unions in the District: A Profile (As on 31/3/2010)

Sr.

No. Union

Reg.

Date

Command

Area

PDCs

Members

Own

Building Computerized

1 Khandala 1977 Khandala 83 yes No

2 Koyana 1957 karad, patan 308 yes Yes

3 Javali 1974 mahableshwar,

javali

108 yes No

4 Patan 1998 Patan 149 yes Yes

5 Phaltan 1976 Phaltan 269 yes No

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

1998 Patan 63 no No

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

In accordance with the table no.5.1 it is clear that Koyana dairy co-

operative union is the oldest one and was established in late 1950’s (i.e. 1957).

Whereas the Khandala, Jaoli and Phalatan unions were registered in the 1970s,

where as the Patan and Shivshambhu unions were registered in the late 1990s,

(i.e 1998). The table also highlight the command area of each co-operative

union. The patan and shivshambhu unions were interestingly registered on the

same date i.e. for the august 1998. Koyana being first and oldest dairy co-

operative in the district, Patan taluka was initially associated with this union.

However, in 1998 a separate dairy co-operative unions having the patan as

command area were registered called as Patan and Shivshambhu dairy co-

operative unions.

The above table also highlights the number of primary dairy co-

operative societies as members of each union. The Koyana Union has the

highest number of primary dairy co-operative societies followed by Phalatan,

Patan and Jaoli. The Khandala and Shivshambhu have the PDCs as members

less than 100 i.e. 83 and 63 respectively.

Page 6: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

160

The above table also points up that except Shivshambhu co-operative

union other unions have their own building. So far as the computerization of

certain activities concerned. the Table reveals the fact that only Koyana and

Patan unions have computerized. Certain activities where were as no

computerization has been introduced by rest of the other unions.

Table No. 5.2

Number of Members of Dairy Co-operative Unions

Name of the

Union

2005-

2006

2006-

2007

2007-

2008

2008-

2009

2009-

2010 CGR

Khandala

(%)

78

(7.98)

83

(8.56)

83

(8.66)

83

(8.52)

83

(11.51) 1.25

Koyana

(%)

332

(33.98)

331

(34.12)

331

(34.55)

343

(35.22)

308

(42.72) -1.14

Javali

(%)

96

(11.05)

96

(9.90)

96

(10.02)

96

(9.86)

96

(13.31) -2.33

Patan

(%)

107

(10.95)

108

(11.13)

96

(10.02)

99

(10.16)

99

(13.78) -2.40

Phaltan

(%)

289

(29.58)

289

(29.79)

289

(30.17)

290

(29.77)

72

(9.99) -24.24

Shiv-Shambhu

(%)

63

(6.45

63

(6.459)

63

(6.58)

63

(6.47)

63

(8.74) 0.00

Total

(%)

977

(100)

970

(100)

958

(100)

974

(100)

721

(100) -5.86

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The table 5.2 indicates the total number of members of each union from

the year 2005-06 to 2009-10, also showing increase or decrease in the number

of membership. The Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the year

2005-06, which has increased to 83 for the year 2006-07 to 2009-10 showing

the positive compounding growth rate CGR of 1.25. The Koyana union had

332 members in 2005-06 which has decreased to 331, 331 in the year 2006-07

and 2007-08, showing an increased of one member in the year 2008-09.

Number of members increased to 343 and number come down to 308 showing

a declining trend in the year 2009-10, having negative compounding growth

rate (-1.14). The Javli union had 96 members 2005-06 and which remained

same from the year 2006-07 to 2009-10. The Patan union also show a negative

Page 7: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

161

CGR (-2.40). as number of members decrease from 108 in 2006-07 to 99 in

the year 2009-10. The most significant negative CGR was notice in the case of

Phalatan unions as the number of members 2008-09 in the year 2005-06

drastically decreased to number 72 in the year 2009-10 as this union has made

the decision to cancel the membership of those members who are not providing

milk with prior permission the appropriate authority.

The Shivshambhu union had the same number of members over the year

i.e. 63.

From the above table, it is observed that there is over all a negative CGR

in the membership of the dairy co-operative unions in the district. The total

number of dairy co-operative unions in the district is made up of a) primary

dairy co-operative societies b) other co-operative societies c) individuals. The

following table reviews the classification of the total number of members as per

its constituents.

Page 8: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

162

Table No.5.3

Number of PDCs societies

Sr.

No

Name of the

Union

2005-

2006

2006-

2007

2007-

2008

2008-

2009

2009-

2010

1 Khandala

(Trends)

78

(100)

83

(106)

83

(106)

83

(106)

83

(106)

2 Koyana

(Trends)

127

(100)

127

(100)

127

(100)

139

(109)

109

(86)

3 Javali

(Trends)

96

(100)

96

(100)

96

(100)

96

(100)

96

(100)

4 Patan

(Trends)

107

(100)

108

(101)

96

(90)

99

(93)

99

(93)

5 Phaltan

(Trends)

267

(100)

267

(100)

267

(100)

268

(100)

50

(19)

6

Shiv-

Shambhu

(Trends)

63

(100)

63

(100)

63

(100)

63

(100)

63

(100)

Total

Trends

738

(100)

743

(101)

731

(99)

747

(101)

499

(68) Source- Annual report of concerning unions.

The above table 5.3 points up that there were 738 P.D.C societies as

member in the district in the year 2005-06. This number has come down to 499

in the year 2009-10. This is because of the fact that the number of primary

dairy co-operative societies at Phaltan union has come down from 267 to 50 in

the year 2009-10.

Page 9: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

163

Table No.5.4

Number of other Co-Operative Societies as members

Sr. No Name of the

Union

2005-

2006

2006-

2007

2007-

2008

2008-

2009

2009-

2010

1 Khandala - - - - -

2 Koyana 9 9 9 9 1

3 Javali 12 - - - -

4 Patan - - - - -

5 Phaltan 22 22 22 22 22

6 Shiv-Shambhu - - - - -

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.4 shows number of other co-operative societies as the

members of each union. From the above table it is observed that Khandala,

Patan and Shiv-shambhu co-operative unions have no other co-operative

societies as a member. The Koyana co-operative union had 9, other co-

operative societies as a member from the year 2005-06 to 2008-09. This

number has come down to number 1 in the year 2009-10. The Phaltan union

had 22 other co-operative societies from 2005-06 to 2009-10.

Table No. 5.5

Number of Individual Members: As Members

Sr. No Name of the

Union

2005-

2006

2006-

2007

2007-

2008

2008-

2009

2009-

2010

1 Khandala - - - - -

2 Koyana 196 195 195 195 23

3 Javali - - - - -

4 Patan - - - - -

5 Phaltan - - - - -

6 Shiv-

Shambhu - - - - -

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 10: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

164

As per the provisions of the co-operative Act 1960, a dairy co-operative

union should not have the individual member of the union, only primary dairy

co-operative societies and other co-operative societies can be the members.

Despite this, the above table shows that the Koyana union, being earliest and

oldest, had 196 as individual members in 2005-06 and this number has been

gradually reduced over the years to 23 in the years 2009-10

Table No.5.6

Primary Dairy Co-operative Societies: Milk Provider and not Provider

Sr.

No

Name of

the Co-op

Union

2005-

2006

2006-

2007

2007-

2008

2008-

2009

2009-

2010

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Milk

Providing

30

(38.46)

25

(30.12)

23

(27.71)

17

(20.48)

19

(22.89)

Non

Providing

48

(61.54)

58

(69.88)

60

(72.29)

66

(79.52)

64

(77.11)

1 Khandala

Total 78

(100)

83

(100)

83

(100)

83

(100)

83

(100)

Milk

Providing

181

(54.52)

171

(51.66)

171

(51.66)

168

(48.98)

172

(55.84)

Non

Providing

151

(45.48)

160

(48.34)

160

(48.34)

175

(51.02)

136

(44.16)

2 Koyana

Total 332

(100)

331

(100)

331

(100)

343

(100)

308

(100)

Milk

Providing

70

(64.81)

72

(75.00)

42

(43.75)

12

(12.50)

12

(12.50)

Non

Providing

26

(35.19)

24

(25.00)

54

(56.25)

84

(87.50)

84

(87.50)

3 Javali

Total 96

(100)

96

(100)

96

(100)

96

(100)

96

(100)

Milk

Providing

105

(98.13)

99

(91.67)

86

(89.58)

86

(86.87)

84

(84.85)

Non

Providing

2

(1.87)

9

(8.33)

10

(10.42)

13

(13.13)

15

(15.15)

4 Patan

Total 107

(100)

108

(100)

96

(100)

99

(100)

99

(100)

Milk

Providing

86

(29.76)

75

(25.95)

75

(25.95)

48

(16.55)

49

(68.06)

Non

Providing

203

(70.24)

214

(74.05)

214

(74.05)

242

(83.45)

23

(31.94)

5 Phaltan

Total 289

(100)

289

(100)

289

(100)

290

(100)

72

(100)

Page 11: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

165

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Milk

Providing

0 8

(12.72)

9

(14.29)

9

(14.29)

8

(12.70)

Non

Providing

63

(100)

55

(87.30)

54

(85.71)

54

(85.71)

55

(87.30)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

Total 63

(100)

63

(100)

63

(100)

63

(100)

63

(100)

Milk

Providing

472

(48.91)

450

(46.40)

406

(42.38)

340

(34.90)

344

(47.71)

Non

Providing

493

(51.08)

520

(53.60)

552

(57.62)

634

(65.10)

377

(52.29)

7 Total

Total 965

(100)

970

(100)

958

(100)

974

(100)

721

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.6 shows the numbers of PDC societies providing milk

to their respective union and the number of non providing societies. The

Khandala dairy union had 30 PDCs providing milk and 48 non providing milk

societies in the year 2005-06. The number of milk providing societies has come

down from 30 in 2005-06 to 19 (2009-10). On the other hand the number of

non providing societies has increased from 48 (2005-06) to 64 in the year

2009-10.

Page 12: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

166

The number of milk providing societies of Koyana union has also gone

down from 181 (2005-06) to 172 (2009-10), respectively the number of non

providing societies has also corresponding come down to 151 (2005-06) to 136

(2009-10). In the case of Javali union there is a tremendous decrease in the

number of milk providing societies i.e form 70 (2005-06) to just 12 in 2009-10

and the number of non providing societies have increase from 26 to 84. The

same is the case with Patan dairy co-operative union showing gradual decrease

and increase in number of milk providers and not providers societies

respectively.

A drastic change in the number of milk providers and not provider

societies is noticed in case of Phaltan dairy co-operative union. In case of Shiv-

shambhu union almost 88% and 12% are not providing and providing milk

societies respectively.

Thus the above table clearly points out that the number of milk

providing societies and non milk providing societies (472) and that of non

milk providing societies (493) in 2005-06 respectively in the year 2009-10,

indicating gradual decrease in the number of milk providing societies. Thus of

the total societies in the district almost 52% of societies are non milk providing

societies. Which is matter of serious concern.

5.3 Directors:

The directors are the policy makers and responsible for the overall

successful running of their respective unions. The overall administration and

management of the union vested with the board of directors. The directors are

elected by the members of the union in the general body meeting on the basis

the principle of co-operation i.e “One member one vote” irrespective of share

holding. Usually the tenure of the directors of the union is 5 years; the directors

so elected are responsible for the following functions.

1. To determine the terms and conditions for raising capital, accepting

deposits and making fruitful investment as per the provisions of co-

operative law.

Page 13: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

167

2. To accept applications of shares, make allotment of shares and transfer

of shares.

3. To keep register and books of account in custody of the union.

4. To authorize member of board of director to check cash, sign on

cashbook etc.

5. To take the decision to provide for the building for the working of union

i.e to construct or hire.

6. To prepare and send the information demanded by the government

department or district union.

7. To arrange for sale and purchase of milk, cattle feed, instruments,

equipments and other material as per requirement of the union.

8. To appoint secretary and other staff and to decide the terms and

conditions of their services.

9. To make schedule for annual general meeting i.e date, place and time.

10. To amend by- laws of the union.

11. To prepare annual reports and financial statement for presenting to the

members at the time of annual general meeting.

Chairman:

After the annual general meeting the chairman is elected to look after

day to day operation by the board in the first meeting. The chairman so elected

is responsible for discharging the following duties.

1. To implement, resolutions passed in the meeting of board of directors

and Annual General Meeting.

2. To supervise the work of manager and other staff.

3. To check cash in hand, inventories after every three months.

4. To run the union as per Act and by-laws.

5. To collect and present the data as required by the dairy department of

the Government and district union.

6. To redress the grievances if any and suggest measures accordingly.

Page 14: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

168

Table No. 5.7

Director Profile: Age Wise (For the year 2009-10)

Sr.No Age (year) Number Percentage

1 21 to 30 0 0

2 31 to 40 14 13.8

3 41 to 50 20 18.69

4 51 to 60 47 43.92

5 Above 60 26 24.29

Total 107 100 Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.7 indicates the age wise profile of the directors of six

unions under the study of 107 total directors of these unions.47 directors

belong to the age group of 51 to 60. Whereas, 14 directors belong to the age

group of 31 to 40 and 26 directors are above 60 years of age. This point out the

fact that most of the directors are senior and fairly matured and experienced

(43.92 percent) commanding the good regard and respect.

Table No. 5.8

Age Wise Directors Profile of Unions

Age group Sr.

No

Name of

the

Union 21 –

30

31 –

40

41 –

50

51 -

60

above

60

Total

1 Khandala - -

2

(11.11)

10

(55.56)

6

(33.33)

18

(100)

2 Koyana -

4

(14.29)

5

(17.86)

16

(57.14)

3

(10.71)

28

(100)

3 Javali -

2

(12.50)

4

(25.00)

8

(50.00)

2

(12.50)

16

(100)

4 Patan -

3

(18.75)

4

(25.00)

5

(31.25)

4

(25.00)

16

(100)

5 Phaltan -

5

(31.25)

2

(12.50)

5

(31.25)

4

(25.00)

16

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu - -

3

(23.08)

3

(23.08)

7

(53.85)

13

(100)

Total

0

14

(13.08)

20

(18.69)

47

(43)

26

(24)

107

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 15: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

169

Table No.5.8 shows the age wise profile of directors of each union under

study. It also points out that no director is of below 30 years of age indicating

the directors of these unions are above 30 years of age. In the age group of 31

to 40 of 14 directors, 5 directors are of Phaltan union, 4 are of Koyana union

and 2 are of Javali union. The Khandala and Shiv-shambhu union have no

directors belonging to this age group. The table also highlights the facts that

most of the directors of these unions are of the middle age and above.

Table No. 5.9

Directors Profile: Level of Education

Sr. No Category Number Percentage

1 Illiterate 2 2

2 Below SSC 51 48

3 HSC 26 24

4 Graduate 12 11

5 Post Graduate 15 14

6 Others 1 1

Total 107 100

Source- Annual report of concerning unions.

Table 5.9 shows the classification of 107 directors of the unions

according to their level of education. i.e from illiterate to post graduation. It

also observes that 51 directors are below SSC level and 26 are higher

secondary certificate holders. 12 directors are graduate and 15 directors are

post graduate. It also clear from the above table, that 50 percent of directors

have the education up to SSC level. And 25 percent of the directors are

graduate and post graduate. Whereas 25 percent of the directors have the

education up to HSC level.

Page 16: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

170

Table No. 5.10

Directors Profile of Each union; Level of Educationwise (2009-10)

Sr.

No

Name of

theUnion

Illi-

terate

Up to

S.S.C.

Up to

H.S.C. Graduate

Post-

Graduate Others Total

1 Khandala -

9

(50)

4

(22)

2

(11)

3

(17) -

18

(100)

2 Koyana

1

(4)

6

(29)

6

(21)

4

(14)

9

(32) -

28

(100)

3 Javali -

7

(44)

7

(44) -

1

(6)

1

(6)

16

(100)

4 Patan -

8

(50)

5

(31)

1

(6)

2

(13) - 16

5 Phaltan -

11

(69)

2

(13)

3

(18) - -

16

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

1

(8)

8

(62)

2

(15)

2

(15) - -

13

(100)

Total 2

(2)

51

(48)

26

(24)

12

(11)

15

(14)

1

(1)

107

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Out of 18 directors of Khandala union, almost 50% of the directors had

the education up to SSC level. Whereas 4 directors (22%) have completed their

HSC, 2 directors are graduate where as 3 directors are post graduate.

In the case Koyana union out of 28 directors, one director had no formal

education, on the other hand 9 directors are post graduate.

In case of Javali union 7 directors are SSC and 7 directors are HSC. One

director is post graduate and other director had holding diploma. Of Patan

union 50% of the directors have their education up to SSC level. 31% up to

SSC, 6% graduate and 13% post graduate. In Phaltan union no a single director

is post graduate but 3 directors are graduate, 11 director had the education up to

SSC level and 2 HSC level. In case of Shiv-shambhu union, 1 director is

illiterate and 2 directors are graduate.

From the above table it is observed that almost 50% of the directors had

the education up to SSC level. The percentage of graduate and post graduate

directors is very low.

Page 17: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

171

Table No. 5.11

Directors profile: Category Wise (2009-10)

Sr.

No Category Khandala Koyana Javali Patan Phaltan

Shiv-

Shambhu Total

1 Open 14

(77.78)

52

(89.29)

11

(68.75)

11

(68.75)

11

(68.75)

10

(76.92)

82

(76.64)

2 Reserve 4

(22.22)

3

(10.71)

5

(31.25)

5

(31.25)

5

(31.25)

3

(23.08)

25

(23.36)

Total 18

(100)

28

(100)

16

(100)

16

(100)

16

(100)

13

(100)

107

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.11 highlights the profile of directors of all these

unions according to category wise. It is observed that all the unions adopt the

reservation policy of the co-operative Act 1960. for appointing the directors.

The category wise representation is given in the appointment of directors. The

above table pointed out that 77% of the directors belong to open category and

23% to reserve category.

Table No. 5.12

Directors profile: Experience wise (2009-10)

Sr.

No

Name of

the

Union

1 to 5

Years

6 to 10

Years

11 to

15

Years

16

to20

Years

above

20

Years

Total

1 Khandala

9

(50.00) -

9

(50.00) - -

18

(100)

2 Koyana

3

(10.71)

12

(42.86)

7

(25.00)

1

(3.57)

5

(17.86) 28

(100)

3 Javali

5

(31.25)

6

(37.50) -

3

(18.75)

2

(12.50) 16

(100)

4 Patan

3

(18.75)

4

(25.00)

7

(43.75)

2

(12.50) -

16

(100)

5 Phaltan

8

(50.00)

5

(31.25)

2

(12.50) -

1

(6.25) 16

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu -

13

(100) - - -

13

(100)

Total 28

(26.17)

40

(37.38)

25

(23.36)

6

(5.61)

8

(7.48)

107

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 18: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

172

The above table 5.12 highlights the directors profile according to their

experience of directorship. 37% of the directors have the experience of 6 to 10

years. Whereas 8% directors are having experience above 20 years. The table

indicates that most of the directors are fairly experienced. It is also observed

that 13% of directors enjoyed more than 4 terms of directorship and 37.38% of

directors elected for 2nd

term.

5.4 (A) Annual general meeting of the members (AGM):

General body of the members is the supreme body of the union. General

body consist of the members of the societies i.e. share holders. As per

Maharashtra co-operative societies Act 1960. Every union has to call and hold

its annual general meeting of its members between 1st April to 14

th August

every year. In this meeting various resolutions are passed for the smooth

running of the business, and giving necessary power to the board of directors,

to implement various resolution passed in the meeting to give the director to

the union. The registrar of co-operative union has the right to extend the period

specified for holding the meeting, generally 3 month for 14th

August onward

and if union failed to call and hold the meeting in such an extended period of 3

month registrar himself has the power to call the meeting. The notice of annual

general meeting is to be served to the members before 14 days of the meeting

along with agenda. Generally the following businesses are transacted in the

annual general meeting.

1. Confirmation of the minutes.

2. Sanctioning the financial report of the last year.

3. Approving financial statements.

4. Approval of the budget.

5. Selection of the Directors.

6. Appointing internal auditor.

7. Deciding about raising loan.

8. Formulating policy about collection of milk, sales of milk with

consultation of the District Milk Union.

Page 19: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

173

9. Amend bylaws of the union.

10. Any other subject with permission of the chair.

Table No: 5.13

Annual General Meeting: Attendance of the members

Unions

Years 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Average

Total

Members 78 83 83 83 83 82

Khanadala Present

Members

36

(46.15)

32

(38.55)

36

(43.37)

25

(30.12)

31

(37.35)

32

(39.08)

Total

Members 332 331 331 343 308

329

Koyana

Present

Members

39

(11.75)

34

(10.27)

46

(13.90)

51

(14.87)

39

(12.66)

41.8

(12.69)

Total

Members 108 96 96 96 96 98.4

Javali Present

Members

52

(48.15)

34

(35.42 )

43

(44.79)

43

(44.79)

31

(32.29)

40.6

(41.8)

Total

Members 107 108 96 99 99 101.8

Patan Present

Members

39

(36.45)

42

(38.89)

49

(51.04)

50

(50.51)

42

(42.42)

44.4

(43.88)

Total

Members 289 289 289 290 72 245.8

Phalatn Present

Members

44

(15.22)

44

(15.22)

58

(20.07)

45

(15.52)

51

(70.83)

48.4

(27.37)

Total

Members 63 63 63 63 63 63

Shiv-

Shambu Present

Members

37

(58.73)

26

(41.27)

27

(42.86)

28

(44.44)

28

(44.44)

29.2

(46.35) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table 5.13 show the attendance of the members in annual general

meeting of all the six unions under the study. Table 5.13 also throws light on

the member’s interest and active participation in annual general meeting. From

the above table the average percentage of the present members for the last 5

years is just 39% i.e almost 61% of the members remain absent in the case of

Koyana union, the picture is not all that encouraging and sordid one as the

percentage of the present member for the last 5 years is just near 13% i.e 87%

of the members are not attending annual general meeting.

Page 20: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

174

In case of Javali union 58% of the members have not attended the

meeting. The average percentage of present member of Patan union is nearest

48%. In the case of Phaltan union average percentage of present member is just

27% and it is 46% in case of Shiv-shambhu union.

The table highlights that most of the members of all unions are not

attending the annual general meeting, a sort of apathy is observed.

Table No. 5.14

BOD meetings: No. of meeting held and directors present 31/03/2010

Sr.

No

Name of the Co-

operative Union

Meeting

Held Present Absent Total

1 Khandala Directors 13 16

(88.88)

2

(11.12)

18

(100)

2 Koyana Directors 15 23

(82.14)

5

(17.86)

28

(100)

3 Javali Directors 10 14

(87.50)

2

(12.50)

16

(100)

4 Patan Directors 14 14

(87.50)

2

(12.50)

16

(100)

5 Phaltan Directors 12 13

(81.25)

3

(18.75)

16

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu Directors 7

9

(69.23)

4

(30.77)

13

(100)

7 Total 71 87 18 107

8 Average 12 15 3 18 Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table 5.14 shows the number of meeting held by the directors during the

year 2009-10 and number of directors attending such meetings reflecting the

interest of the director in the affairs of the union. In the year 2009-10 the

maximum number of meeting were held by the Koyana union i.e 15 meetings,

whereas in the case of Shiv-shambhu 7 meetings were held. It is clear from the

above table that except Shiv-shambhu union, the directors meeting were held

regularly per month. It is also noted that except Shiv-shambhu, the average

percentage of directors attending the meeting is almost 85 percent of the total

number of directors. In case of Shiv-shambhu unions the average percentage of

present number is hovering around 70%, it is also good sign.

Page 21: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

175

Table No. 5.15

BOD: appointment, meetings, decisions (2009-10)

Sr.

No. Question asked

Khand

ala Koyana Javali Patan

Phal

tan

Shiv-

Shambhu

1

Whether directors

are elected as per

rule?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

2

Whether directors

are elected by

election/unanimo

usly?

Unanim

ously

Unanim

ously

Unanim

ously

Unanim

ously

Elect

ion

Unanimo

usly

3

Whether

reservation policy

observe in

director body?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

4

Whether meeting

called as per rule

by giving notice

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

5

Whether directors

make decision on

the basis of

majority of

votes?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

6

Whether meeting

minutes written

as per rule?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

7

Whether director

appointed sub

committees for

daily work?

Yes Yes Yes No No No

8

whether secretary

has been given

sufficient rights

for daily work

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

The table no 5.15 highlights the general information about the board of

directors and its functioning. It also indicate how the directors are appointed,

are the meetings are held properly, how the director make the decision, whether

minutes of the meetings are maintained.

According to above table the directors of all the unions are elected as per

the rules and almost all the directors are elected unanimously except Phaltan

union, indicating the political influence, the reservation policies strictly

observed in the constitution of board of directors, All the meetings i.e annual

Page 22: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

176

general meeting, board of directors meeting and other sub committees meeting

are properly held in accordance with the provision of the law. The directors of

all the unions make the decisions on the basis of majority of votes. The minutes

and proceeding of all the meetings are properly maintained. In case of

Khandala, Koyana and Javali union directors appointed sub committees to look

after the daily work. Except Shiv-shambhu the secretary of all other unions has

been given the sufficient rights for carrying out the daily work.

5.5 Employees:

A well motivated employee is an asset of organization. The growths of

any business organization largely depend on a committed work force; in fact

they are the pillar of the organization. It is through them the day to day working

and operation of organization are carried out. Co-operative unions now

exception to this. The ultimate success of all the consumer of all co-operative

union largely depends on the devoted, committed and well groven employees.

They are responsible for implementing all the planned, strategies and policies

of board of directors through the width and length of the organization. The

work force of the union generally consist of manager, assistant manager, clerk,

computer operator, tester, technician and in other employees peon, veterinary

workers, drivers , cleaners etc.

The job profile, the duties and the responsibilities of employees each

category as above are defined by the board of directors.

Manager:

Manager is appointed by the Board of Director. He is the chief

administrative officer of the union. The manager performs the following

function:

1. To call meetings of Board of Directors and Annual General Meeting.

2. To write and maintain minutes and proceeding of the meetings.

3. To insure the cost as per guidance given by the Board of Directors.

4. To maintain Books of Accounts and prepare financial statements in the

prescribed form.

5. To provide information to members of Board of Directors.

6. To compile with the audit report and present it to the board of director.

7. To supervise work of other staff.

Page 23: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

177

8. To control overall working of the union.

9. To fulfill the duties assigned by Board of Directors.

10. Any other work assigned by Act and by-laws.

Table No: 5.16

Employees Working in Various Departments of the Unions (2009-10)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

There are various departments in unions as per the requirement to look

after their routine and other work/ activities. The above table shows the number

of employees working in each department. There are 11 employees in

Khandala dairy co-operative union of which 5 employees are working in

management department as manager, clerk, computer operator, accountant etc.

and 6 employees in procurement department.

Koyana dairy union is the oldest co-operative union having a separate

dairy and dairy related department. The Koyana union has total force of 280

Sr.

No. Department

Khandal

a

Koyan

a Javali Patan

Phalta

n

Shiv-

Shambhu Total

1 Management 5

(45.45)

33

(11.79)

3

(60.00)

10

(33.33)

6

(21.43)

3

(100)

60

(16.81)

2 Procurement 6

(54.55)

19

(6.79)

2

(40.00)

10

(33.33)

19

(67.86) -

56

(15.69)

3 Dairy - 87

(31.07) - - - -

87

(24.37)

4 Milk

Processing -

22

(7.86) - - - -

22

(6.16)

5 Veterinary - 5

(1.79) - - - -

5

(1.40)

6 Sales - 23

(8.21) - - - -

23

(6.44)

7 Store - 3

(1.07) - - - -

3

(0.84)

8 Lab section - 12

(4.29) - -

3

(10.71) -

12

(4.20)

9 Ice Factory - 7

(2.50) - - - -

7

(1.96)

10 Transpor-

tation -

40

(14.29) -

10

(33.33) - -

40

(14.01)

11 Engineering - 29

(1.36) - - -

29

(8.12)

12 Total 11

(100)

280

(100)

5

(100)

30

(100)

28

(100)

3

(100)

357

(100)

Page 24: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

178

employees of which maximum number of employees working in dairy

department (87). 19 employees are working in milk procurement department,

where 33 employees are working in management department. As Koyana union

has a dairy, 22 employees are working in the milk processing department. This

union has also a separate veterinary department where is 5 employees are

working including doctor and other assistant staff for attending the problems of

the live stock of farmer members. It is also separate sales department looking

after the marketing of milk and other dairy products. There are 23 employees

working in the department, 3 employees working in the store, 12 employees in

the lab section. This union has also ice factory where 7 employees are working,

only Koyana and Patan union had separate their own transportation department

where 40 and 10 employees are working respectively. There are 29 employees

in the engineering department of Koyana union. Except Koyana union no other

union have dairy, milk processing, veterinary, sales, store department and also

ice factory. Most of the employees other than Koyana union are working in the

management and procurement department. The Phalatan union has separate lab

section with 3 employees.

Table No. 5.17

Classification of Employees: Designation Wise (For the year 2009-10)

Sr.

No Unions

Secretary /

Manager

Assist. Secretary /

Comp. Clerk/

Operator

Technician Peon/

Others Total

1 Khandala 2

(18.18)

3

(27.27)

1

(9.09)

5

(45.45)

11

(100)

2 Koyana 8

(2.86)

206

(73.57)

16

(5.71)

50

(17.86)

280

(100)

3 Javali 1

(20.00)

2

(40.00)

1

(20.00)

1

(20.00)

5

(100)

4 Patan 2

(6.67)

12

(40.00)

3

(10.00)

13

(43.33)

30

(100)

5 Phaltan 2

(7.14)

13

(46.43)

4

(14.29)

9

(32.14)

28

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambu

1

(33.33)

2

(66.67)

3

(100)

Total 16

(4.48)

238

(66.67)

25

(7.00)

78

(21.85)

357

(100)

Page 25: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

179

Table no 5.17 show the classification of total employees of each union

according to their designation/ status of the total 357 employees of all the

unions under study. Most of the employee’s are working as assistant

secretary/Computer Clerk/Operator (66.66%), where as 21.85 percent

employees are working as Peon. Only 7% employees are technicians.

Considering the union wise data, of 11 employees of Khandala union, 5

employees are working as peon(45.45%) and 3 employees are working as

Assistant Secretary/ clerk (27.27%), two employees have a designation of

Secretary/Manager(18.18%). There is only one technician in this union.

Of 280 employees of Koyana union, most of the employees working in

category of Assistant Secretary/ clerk/ computer operator (206). There are 16

technicians and 50 employees are working as peon/ others. 8 employees

working in the post of secretary/ manager.

In case of Javali, Patan and Phaltan union 40 percent, 40 percent and 46

percent employees respectively are working in the category of Assistant

Secretary/ clerk/ computer operator.

Out of 3 employees of Shiv-shambhu union two employees are working

as clerk and one employees is manager of the union. No employee working as

technision and peon in the union. The table highlights the points that most of

the unions need employees to the category of Secretary, Computer Clerk and

Operator for the smooth operation of the dairy cooperative union.

Page 26: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

180

Table No. 5.18

Employee’s profile: level of Education wise (for 2009-10)

Sr.

No.

Educational

Qualification

Numbers of

Employees Percentage

1 Illiterate - -

2 Up to S.S.C 80 22.41

3 Up to H. S. C 70 19.61

4 H.S.C./ Diploma 56 15.69

5 Graduate 61 17.09

6 Post Graduate 60 16.81

7 Others 30 8.40

Total 357 100.00

The above table 5.18 shows the classification of number of employees

of all the unions based on level of education. Out of 357 employees 80

employees had the education of the SSC level (22.41%), 17 had their education

up to HSC level. 56 employees are HSC/ diploma holders also heartening to

know that 121 employees are graduate and post graduate (61 and 60

respectively). there were no illiterate employees in all the six unions. indicating

the unions are getting qualified employees in their unions.

Table No. 5.19

Salaries Paid to Employees: Category Wise (as on 31/03/2010)

Sr.

No. Categories Khandala Koyana Javali Patan Phaltan

Shiv-

Shambhu

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Manager/ M.D 4800

(20.25)

38000

(26.10)

12000

(55.56)

9250

(35.17)

7500

(36.23) 0

2 Procurement

officer

4500

(18.99)

15437

(10.60) 0

4700

(17.87)

5500

(26.57) 0

3 Dairy Manager 0 13288

(9.13) 0 0 0 0

4 Production

Manager 0

13288

(9.13) 0 0 0 0

5 Veterinary

Officer 0

15648

(10.75) 0 0 0 0

Page 27: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

181

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

6 Chemist 0 9913

(6.81) 0 0 0 0

7 Accountant 4500

(18.99)

11148

(7.66)

6900

(31.94)

3050

(11.60) 0 0

8 Cashier 3450

(14.56)

7255

(4.98) 0

3050

(11.60) 0 0

9 Clerk 3450

(14.56)

5037

(3.46) 0

2750

(10.60)

4500

(21.74) 0

10 Peon 3000

(12.66)

3863

(2.65)

2700

(12.50)

1750

(6.65)

3200

(15.46) 0

11 Attendant 0 3660

(2.51) 0

1750

(6.65) 0 0

12 Driver 0 5227

(3.59) 0 0 0 0

13 Cleaner 0 3822

(2.63) 0 0 0 0

Total 23700

(100)

145586

(100)

21600

(100)

26300

(100)

20700

(100) 0

The above table 5.19 reveals the facts that now salary has been paid the

employees of (3) Shiv-shambhu union as they are basically the employees of

Doulatnagar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Doulatnagar entrusted with the

additional responsibility of looking after the activities of this union. There is

also great degree of disparity in salaries paid to the employees in various

categories. It is also noted that most of the employees of these unions of in

different categories are not getting good salary compared to their counterpart

elsewhere.

Page 28: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

182

Table No. 5.20

Classification of facilities provided to the employees (31/03/2010)

Sr.

No. Categories Khandala Koyana Javali Patan Phaltan

Shiv-

Shambhu

1 Regular

Payment Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

2 Contract base

payment No Yes No No No No

3 Training No Yes No Yes No No

4 Loan from

other Bank No Yes No No No No

5 Medical

Facilities No Yes No No No No

6 Gratuity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

7 Pension No Yes Yes Yes Yes No

8 Provident fund No Yes Yes Yes Yes No

9 Leave Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

10 credit societies No Yes No Yes Yes No

11 Incentives Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

The above table 5.20 shows the job related facilities provided by unions

to the employees except Shiv-shambhu, regular payment is made to the

employees of all the unions. Koyana union make the payment on the contract

basis by hiring employees as and when require for the specific job getting done,

like cleaning of milk cans. Training facilities are provided by only Koyana and

Patan union. The Koyana union make the arrangement for getting the loan for

other bank for their employees (if required), by giving necessary guaranty. No

union other than Koyana providing bank loan facilities. Gratuity is provided to

all employees except shiv-shambhu union. Pension facility is given the

employees of koyana, Jaoli, Patan, Phaltan union and also the provident fund.

The leave and incentive facilities are provided by all the unions. It is noted that

Page 29: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

183

the employees of Koyana union are awaring all the facilities. These unions

contribute a matching share of 12% to the provident fund.

Table No. 5.21

Types of Leave ; Facilities given to the employees

Type of Leave

Sr. No Name of

Unions Casual

Leave

Medical

leave

others

leave Total

1 Khandala 15 10 15 40

2 Koyana 15 10 20 45

3 Javali 12 10 24 46

4 Patan 15 10 20 45

5 Phaltan 12 10 25 47

6 Shiv-

Shambhu - - - -

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table above table 5.21 shows the types of leave facilities the employees

are entity to these unions. It examines whether the unions provide the leave

facility to the employees and what types of leave can be availed by them.

Except the employees of Shiv-shambhu the employees of other union enjoy all

types of leaves provided by the union. (casual, medical and other leaves). It is

also clear from the above table; the employees usually can get about 42 to 45

days leave in years.

Page 30: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

184

Table No. 5.22

Annual Milk Collection: Live Stock Wise (Liters in 000)

Sr.

No

Name of

Co-op.

Union

Category 2005-

06 2006-07

2007-

08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

Cow 1100

(16.22)

1162

(17.13)

937

(13.81)

1757

(25.90)

1827

(26.93)

6783

(100)

1 Khandala

Total 1100

(16.22)

1162

(17.13)

937

(13.81)

1757

(25.90)

1827

(26.93)

6783

(100)

Cow 10154

(17.20)

10233

(17.34)

11396

(19.31)

12096

(20.49)

15146

(25.66)

59025

(100)

Buffalo 10142

(17.71)

10232

(17.87)

11565

(20.20)

12089

(21.11)

13227

(23.10)

57255

(100)

2 Koyana

Total 20296

(17.45)

20465

(17.60)

22961

(19.75)

24185

(20.80)

28373

(24.40)

116280

(100)

Cow 4557

(39.74)

3536

(30.83)

1270

(11.07)

670

(5.84)

1435

(12.51)

11468

(100)

3 Javali

Total 4557

(39.74)

3536

(30.83)

1270

(11.07)

670

(5.84)

1435

(12.51)

11468

(100)

Cow 318

(37.28)

169

(19.81)

101

(11.84)

98

(11.49)

167

(19.58)

853

(100)

Buffalo 3279

(19.78)

3362

(20.26)

3251

(19.59)

3319

(20.00)

3381

(20.38)

16592

(100)

4 Patan

Total 3597

(20.62)

3531

(20.24)

3352

(19.21)

3417

(19.59)

3548

(20.34)

17445

(100)

Cow

10702

(31.18)

7143

(20.81)

3963

(11.55)

7174

(20.90)

5343

(15.57)

34325

(100)

5 Phaltan

Total 10702

(39.37)

7143

(19.82)

3963

(14.58)

7174

(26.39)

5343

(19.66)

27182

(100)

Cow - 36

(16.74)

45

(20.93)

75

(34.88)

59

(27.44)

215

(100)

Buffalo - 157

(9.53)

641

(38.90)

751

(45.57)

99

(6.01)

1648

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

Total - 193

(10.36)

686

(36.82)

826

(44.34)

158

(8.48)

1863

(100)

Cow 26831

(23.81)

22279

(19.77)

17712

(15.72)

21870

(19.41)

23977

(21.28)

112669

(100)

Buffalo 13421

(17.78)

13751

(18.21)

15457

(20.47)

16159

(21.40)

16707

(22.13)

75495

(100)

Total

Total 40252

(21.39)

36030

(19.15)

33169

(17.63)

38029

(20.21)

40684

(21.62)

188164

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.22 shows light on annual collection of milk live stock

wise of the unions under study over the years 2005-06 to 2009-10. It is clear

from the above table that the annual collection of milk shows the increasing

trend.

Page 31: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

185

In case of Khandala, Jaoli and Phaltan union only caw milk collected, in

case of Khandala union the annual milk collection shows increasing trend,

during 2005-06 to 2009-10. However in case of Jaoli and Phaltan union it

shows the decreasing trend.

In case of Koyana union the annual milk collection of both the live stock

also shows the increasing trend over the years.

In case of Patan union the annual collection of cow milk also shows

decreasing trend i.e. 27.28% in 2008-06 to 19.58 in 2009-10. Whereas the

annual collection of buffalo milk shows a steady increased.

In case of Shiv-shambhu union there was no milk collection in the year

2005-06. The annual collection of cow milk shows wide fluctuation. Where as

in case of buffalo milk an increasing trend was notice during 2007-08 and

2008-09 compared to milk collection in 2006-07. However the share of buffalo

milk collection has gone down the year 2009-10 (6.01%). The overall picture

of milk collection of all the six unions shows the steady increasing trend.

Page 32: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

186

Table No. 5.23

Average annual Collection of Total Milk:

Milk Provider’s Society Wise

(in liter)

Sr.

No

Name of the

Co-op

Union

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

2009-

10 Total

1 Khandala 36678

(9.84)

46486

(12.55)

50613

(12.82)

103381

(19.74)

96181

(15.14)

333340

(14.51)

2 Koyana 112133

(30.09)

119683

(32.31)

134270

(34.02)

143958

(27.48)

164966

(25.91)

675010

(29.39)

3 Javali

65102

(17.47)

49117

(13.26)

30234

(7.66)

55825

(10.66)

119569

(18.82)

319846

(13.93)

4 Patan 34267

(9.19)

35667

(9.63)

38982

(9.88)

39740

(7.59)

42238

(6.65)

190894

(8.31)

5 Phaltan 124444

(33.40)

95247

(25.71)

52840

(13.39)

163329

(31.18)

109049

(17.16)

544909

(23.72)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

-

24182

(6.53)

87656

(22.22)

17554

(3.55)

103306

(16.26)

232697

(10.13)

Total 372624

(100)

370381

(100)

394594

(100)

523787

(100)

635310

(100)

2296696

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.23 show the average annual collection of milk of the

member of societies of each union.(i.e. total milk collected ÷ number of milk

provider societies of each union) the average annual collection of total milk per

society was 36678 liters (11%) the year 2005-06 and there were30 milk

providing societies. In the year 2006-07 the percentage has increased 30.94%as

the number of milk providing societies has gone down to 25%.In the year

2007-08 the total average annual milk collected was 15.18%.This is against

because of the number of milk providing societies has gone down to 23%.In the

year 2008-09and 2009-10 increasing trend was noticed as number of milk

providing societies gone down.

In case of Koyana union an increasing trend in the average collection of

milk per society is noticed (i.e from 16.65 in the year 2005-06 to 24.43 in the

year 2009-10)

Page 33: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

187

In case of Javali union the average annual collection of milk was 65102

litre (20.35%) in the year 2005-06.The percentage has gone down to15.35% in

the year2006-07, However in the year 2007-08 the percentage was 9.45%

because of decrease in the number of milk providing societies (42%) and less

collection of total milk compared to year 2006-07.where as the percentage has

gone up to 17.45% in the year 2008-09 because of more collection of milk and

less number of milk providing societies(12 %) in the year 2009 -10.The

percentage has gone to37.38% because of more average collection of milk and

less number of milk providing societies (12%) there in an increasing trend

noticed in the case of Patan union.

In case of Phaltan union wide fluctuation noticed in the average

collection of milk per society. It is because of decrease in the number of milk

providing societies and variation in average collection of milk over the years.

In case of Shivshambhu union the highest average annual collection of milk

was in the year 2009-10 and lowest in 2008-09.

The overall picture which emerges from the above table that the average

annual collection of the total milk that there is an increasing trend noticed in

collection of total milk per society.

Page 34: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

188

Table No 5.24

Total milk Collection; Live stock wise

( liters in 000)

Sr.

No Categories 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Cow

%

26831

(66.66)

22279

(61.83)

17712

(53.40)

21870

(57.51)

24175

(58.27)

112867

(59.73)

2 Buffalo

%

13421

(33.34)

13751

(38.17)

15457

(46.60)

16159

(42.49)

17312

(41.73)

76100

(40.27)

3 Total

%

40252

(100)

36030

(100)

33169

(100)

38029

(100)

41487

(100)

188967

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table no 5.24 shows the share of cow and Buffalo milk in the total milk

collection of all the unions. Khandala,Javali and Phaltan union collect only

Cow milk, where as other unions are collect both Cow and Buffalo milk from

the year 2005-06 to 2009-10.It is noticed from the above table that the

percentage of Cow milk in the total milk collection is more than that of buffalo

milk over the year from 2005-06 to 2009-10,However it is also noticed the

share of cow milk coming down and that of buffalo milk showing increasing

trend compared to the year 2005-06.

Page 35: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

189

Table No. 5.25

Per Day total Milk Collection: Year Wise (Figures in liters)

Sr.

No

Name of the

Cooperative

Union

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

2009-

10 Total

1 Khandala 3014

(2.73)

3184

(3.23)

3189

(3.23)

4815

(4.62)

5006

(4.49)

19208

(3.72)

2 Koyana 55604

(50.42)

56070

(56.80)

62804

(68.53)

66260

(63.61)

77736

(69.74)

318474

(61.69)

3 Javali 12485

(11.32)

9689

(9.82)

3479

(3.80)

1835

(1.76)

3931

(3.53)

31419

(6.09)

4 Patan 9858

(8.94)

9674

(9.80)

9160

(10.00)

9364

(8.99)

9721

(8.72)

47777

(9.25)

5 Phaltan 29321

(26.59)

19562

(19.82)

10857

(11.85)

19633

(18.85)

14640

(13.13)

94013

(18.21)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

-

530

(0.54)

2155

(2.35)

2264

(2.17)

432

(0.39)

5381

(1.04)

Total 110282

(100)

98709

(100)

91644

(100)

104171

(100)

111466

(100)

516272

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table No.5.25 examine the per day total milk collection of the each

union from 2005-06 to 2009-10. There is increasing trend notice in per day

total milk collection, in the case of Koyana union and also Khandala union.

However it show the wide fluctuation in the per day collection in the rest of

other unions. The per day milk collection of Koyana union is the highest

compared to other unions asset has highest of milk providing societies.

Graph No. 5.25

Page 36: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

190

Table No. 5.26

Sales; Category wise (Yes/No)

Sr

no Catagary Khandala Koyana Javali Patan Phaltan Shivshambhu

1 Co-op

sale

No Yes Yes No Yes Yes

2 Govt sale Yes Yes Yes No Yes No

3 Private

sale

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

4 Local sale No Yes Yes No Yes No

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table 5.31shows the profile (port folio) of all the unions under the study

i.e to whome the sales are made by the union .Koyana ,Javali, Phaltan and

shivshambhu unions sell the milk to other co-operative unions. The milk is sold

to government by Khandala, Koyana, Javali and Phaltan union. Except

Shivshambhu union all other unions make the private sales. The local sales are

made by Koyana, Javali and Phaltan.

Table No. 5.27 (A)

Total Milk Sale; Year Wise

(Figars in Ltr)

Sr.

No

Year

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Khandala

1100362

(2.73)

(16.23)

1162064

(3.22)

(17.15)

934729

(2.87)

(13.79)

1753369

(4.65)

(25.87)

1825835

(4.41)

(26.94)

6776359

(3.60)

(100)

2 Koyana

20302124

(50.36)

(17.39)

20521064

(56.58)

(17.58)

22936371

(70.50)

(19.65)

24501800

(65.03)

(21.00)

28459086

(68.68)

(24.38)

116720445

(62.07)

(100)

3 Javali

4602439

(11.42)

(40.37)

3530073

(9.78)

(30.97)

1161312

(3.57)

(10.19)

669512

(1.78)

(5.87)

1434828

(3.46)

(12.58)

11398164

(6.06)

(100)

4 Patan

3598091

(8.93)

(20.62)

3531062

(9.79)

(20.23)

3352537

(10.30)

(19.22)

3417678

(9.07)

(19.59)

3548019

(8.56)

(20.33)

17447387

(9.28)

(100)

5 Phaltan

10705620

(26.55)

(31.18)

7140290

(19.79)

(20.80)

3963034

(12.18)

(11.55)

7173699

(19.04)

(20.90)

5343427

(12.90)

(15.56)

34326070

(18.25)

(100)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu -

193454

(0.53)

(14.18)

186847

(0.57)

(13.69)

157990

(0.42)

(11.58)

826155

(1.99)

(60.55)

1364446

(0.72)

(100)

Total

40308636

(100)

(21.83)

3607800

(100)

(19.19)

32534830

(100)

(17.30)

37674048

(100)

(20.03)

41437350

(100)

(22.03)

188032871

(100)

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 37: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

191

The above table 5.27(A) show the total sales of all the union over the

last last five years i,e from 2005-06 to 2009-10 and increasing trend is noticed

in total milk sale yearwise, in case of Khandala, Koyana and Shivshambhu

union, whereas as a declining trend is noticed in respect of sales of Javali,

Patan Phaltan.

In the year 2005-06 the sales were the highest in case of Koyana

union(50.36%) and this trend also noticed in the following years up to 2009-

10.Being oldest and having larger number of members, Koyana union has sold

maximum liters of milk.

Page 38: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

192

Table No. 5.27 (B)

Classification of Total sale according to categories and Year (Figures in Rs)

Sr.

No

Year

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Khandala 9872374

(2.16)

12617307

(2.64)

14439152

(2.73)

23493348

(3.67)

25474868

(3.24)

85897049

(2.97)

2 Koyana 257427129

(56.22)

300978589

(63.07)

387298296

(73.12)

441316726

(69.02)

579718961

(73.74)

1966739701

(68.04)

3 Javali 36979428

(8.08)

32180452

(6.74)

12449135

(2.35)

8070464

(1.26)

17715425

(2.25)

107394904

(3.72)

4 Patan 47971537

(10.48)

52774156

(11.06)

55717362

(10.52)

63607077

(9.95)

72909447

(9.27)

292979579

(10.14)

5 Phaltan 105635230

(23.07)

75878256

(15.90)

47791296

(9.02)

87186480

(13.64)

73353518

(9.33)

389844780

(13.14)

6 Shiv-

Shambhu

2747993

(0.56)

12006094

(2.27)

15704120

(2.46)

17045417

(2.17)

47503624

(1.64)

Total 457885698

(100)

477176753

(100)

529701335

(100)

639378215

(100)

786217636

(100)

2890359637

(100)

This table also shows the same result as above

Table No.5. 28

Proportion of local sales to total sale

(Liter in 000)

Sr.

No

Year

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

2008-

09

2009-

10

Local sale 17739 15566 13178 10714 11013 1 Koyana

Total sale 20302 20521 22936 24501 28459

% of( i-ii) 87.37 75.85 57.46 43.72 38.69

Local sale 112 85 21 1.5 - 2 Javali

Total sale 4602 3530 1161 669 1434

% of( i-ii) 2.43 2.40 1.81 2.40 0

Local sale 12 8.4 7.4 3.8 7.1 3 Phaltan

Total sale 10705 7140 3969 7173 5343

% of( i-ii) 0.11 0.11 0.18 0.05 0.13

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 39: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

193

Table: 5.28 Koyana, Javali and Phaltan unions make the local sale .The

above table shows that the Koyana union has the highest proportion of local

sale to total sale, however it is showing the declining trend. The average

percentage of local sales to total sale of this union over the last 5 Years is

60.61%. It indicates that local sales form the major portion of the total sale. In

case of Javali union the average portion of local sale to total sales is 2.22,

forming meager share in the total sale .In case of Phaltan union the proportion

of local sale is below 1%of the total sale.

Page 40: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

194

Table No 5. 29

Proportion of Co-operative Sale to Total Sale.

(Liters In 000 )

Sr.

No

Year

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Co-op.

Sale 2116 4627 9176 7226 11509

Total sale 20302 20521 22936 24501 28459 1 Koyana

%of i/-ii 10.42 22.54 40.00 29.49 40.44

Co-op.

Sale 772 1354 38 121 -

Total sale 4602 3530 1161 669 1434 2 Javali

%of i/-ii 16.77 38.35 3.27 18.08 0

Co-op.

Sale 2302 2018 3213 3122 3088

Total sale 10705 7140 3963 7173 5343 3 Phaltan

%of i/-ii 21.50 28.26 81.07 43.52 57.79

Co-op.

Sale - 193 186 157 826

Total sale - 193 186 157 826 4 Shiv-

Shambhu

%of i/-ii - 100 100 100 100

Co-op. Sale 5190 8192 13114 11295 14708

Total sale 35609 31384 28246 32500 36262

%of i/-ii 14.57 26.10 26.42 34.75 40.78

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table No.5.29 shows the sale to other cooperative union units by

Koyana, Javali, Phaltan and Shivshambu and the percentage of Cooperative

sale to total sale of each union, during the last 5 years i.e 2005-06 to 2009-

10.The sale to the other co-operative union by Koyana union show increasing

trend during the year 2006-07 and 2007-08, however it has come down to

29.49% in the year 2008-09 but again it increased to 40.44%.

In case of Javali union decreasing the percentage of Cooperative sale to

the total sale has increase to 38.35% compared to 16.77% in 2005-06.In the

year 2007-08 it has decrease to 3.27% and again increase to 18.08% in the year

2008-09,however in the year 2009.-10 this union has not sold the milk to other

cooperative union. So far as Phaltan union is concerned the percentage shows

Page 41: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

195

the increasing trend. It was highest in the year 2007-08 (81.07%) It is

interesting to note that the Shivshambhu union has sold the entire milk

collected to other co-operative union.

It is evident from the above table that Shivshambhu union sales to other

co-operative union. The over all picture emerges is that percentage of co-

operative union sale to total sale show increasing trend.

Table No. 5.30

Profile of Government Sale to Total Sale

(Liters in 000) Sr.

No

Year

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

2009-

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Government.

Sale 989 1162 935 1753 1825

Total sale 1100 1162 9347 1753 1825 1 Khandala

%of i/-ii 89.90 100 10 100 100

Government.

Sale 446 - - 1295 170

Total sale 20302 20521 22936 24501 28459 2 Koyana

%of i/-ii 2.19 0 0 5.28 0.59

Page 42: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

196

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Government.

Sale 3518 2062 1112 438 1434

Total sale 4602 3530 1161 669 1434 3 Javali

%of i/-ii 76.44 58.41 95.77 65.47 100

Government.

Sale 2899 851 11 3771 1104

Total sale 10705 7140 3963 7173 5343 5 Phaltan

%of i/-ii 27.08 11.91 0.02 52.57 20.66

Government.

Sale 7852 4075 2058 6657 4534

Total sale 36709 32353 37407 34096 36761 6 Total

%of i/-ii 21.38 12.59 5.50 19.52 12.30

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.30 show proportion of Government sale to the total

sale of Khandala,Koyana,Javali and Phaltan union. In case of Khandala union

the Percentage Government sale to the total sale was 89.90% in the year 2005-

06and in the year 2006-07 it was 100%, whereas year 2007-08 it was just

10%,in the year 2008-09 and 2009-10 the total sale consisted of government

sale.

The Koyana union has sold the milk to the government in the year 2005-

06,2008-09 and 2009-10,as compared to the government sale the year 2005-06

(2.19%) increase to 5.28% in the year 2008-09 and has come down to just

below 1%.

So far as Javali union is concerned government sale to the total sale was

76.44% which come down to 58.41% in the year 2006-07,increase to 95.77%

in the year 2007-08 and again decrease in the year 2008-09(65.47%) in the

year2009-10. It was all Government sale.

In case of Phaltan union the proportion of Government sale to the total

sale was highest in the year 2008-09(52.57%) and lowest in the year 2007-

Page 43: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

197

08(0.02%) The above table highlight the point that there is wide fluctuation

notice in the share of government sale to the total sale of the union.

Table No. 5.31

Profile of Private Sales to Total Sale . (Liters in 000 )

Sr.

No

Year

Union

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

2009-

10

Private Sale 110 - - - - 1 Khandala

Total sale 1100 - - - -

%of i/-ii 10 0 0 0 0

Private Sale - 328 582 5287 5367

Total sale 20302 20521 22936 24501 28459 2 Koyana

%of i/-ii 0 1.60 2.53 21.57 22.37

Private Sale - 28.6 9.5 2.1 -

Total sale 4602 35305 1161 669 1434 3 Javali

%of i/-ii 0 0.81 0.81 0.31 0

Private Sale 3598 3531 3352 3417 3548

Total sale 3598 3531 3352 3417 3548 4 Patan

%of i/-ii 100 100 100 100 100

Private Sale - 3367 731 275 1143

Total sale 10705 7140 3963 7173 5343 5 Phaltan

%of i/-ii 0 47.15 18.44 3.83 21.39

Total Private Sale 3708 7254.6 4674.5 8982.1 10058

Total Sale 40307 35884 40759 37513 40609

Per liter rate 9.19 20.21 11.46 23.94 24.76

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 44: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

198

The above table 5.31 highlight the sale of Khandala, Koyana, Javali,

Patan and Phaltan union, show the percentage of private sale to the total sale of

each union, from the year 2005-06 to 2009-10.

The Khandala union made the private sale in the year 2005-06 only,

forming just 10% of the total sale where as from the year 2006-07 to 209-10

there ware no private sale.

In case of Koyana union it started making private sale from the year

2006-07 onward and the percentage of private sale to the total sales of the

Koyana union shows the increasing trend

So far as Javali union is concerned the percentage of private sale to the

total sale is just negligible, below 1% it made no private sale in the year 2005-

06 to 2009-10

The total sale of Patan union is made up of private sale only (100%) In

case of Patan union the percentage shows the decreasing trend.

Priv

ate

Sa

le

Page 45: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

199

Table No.5.32

Average Milk Purchase Rate of Dairy Co-operative Unions

Sr.

No Year Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Cost (Rs) 8362010 10206323 9960949 21204381 22989405

Liter 1100362 1162148 1164121 1757485 1827456 1 Khandala

(Cow Milk)

Per liter

cost 7.60 8.78 8.56 12.07 12.58

Cost (Rs) 221150604 259233678 326851201 387796186 521708481

Liter 20296101 20465912 22960221 24185020 28374142 2

Koyana

Cow &

Buffalo) Per liter

cost 10.90 12.67 14.24 16.03 18.39

Cost (Rs) 35659203 31561936 13401813 7990428 17753975

Liter 4557196 3536431 1269827 669906 1434828 3 Javali

(Cow Milk)

Per liter

cost 7.82 8.92 10.55 11.93 12.37

Cost (Rs) 41055798 46882927 48888235 56313623 63969535

Liter 3598091 3531062 3352537 3417678 3548019 4

Patan

(Cow &

Buffalo) Per liter

cost 11.41 13.28 14.58 16.48 18.03

Cost (Rs) 86096462 62503768 38328890 78398302 63101355

Liter 10702191 7143531 3963034 7839830 5343427 5 Phaltan

(Cow)

Per liter

cost 8.04 8.75 9.67 10.0 11.81

Cost (Rs) 2747993 12006094 2700806 15704120

Liter 193454 788906 157990 826455 6

Shiv-

Shambhu

(Cow &

Buffalo) Per liter

cost 14.20 15.22 17.09 19.00

The table 5.32 shows the procurement/purchase rate of dairy co-

operative union over the last five years i.e. year 2005-06 to 2009-10.(Total cost

of procurement/purchase – Total milk collected in each year) From the above

table it is noticed that procurement/purchase rate of Cow milk in case of

Khandala, Javali and Phaltan union is showing the increasing trend compared

to the base year of 2005-06.

Page 46: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

200

In case of Koyana, Patan and shivshambhu union the average rate at

which milk collected (both cow and buffalo) also shows increasing trend. It is

to be noted that the procurement/purchase rate is the rate at which the milk

being collected. It include no other cost.

Table No. 5.33

Average Milk Sales Rate

Sr.

No

Union/

Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Rupees 9872374 12617304 14439152 23493348 25474868

Liter 1100362 1162064 934729 1753369 1825835 1

Khandala

(Cow

Milk) Average

Rate 8.97 10.86 15.44 13.39 13.95

Rupees 257427129 300978589 387298296 441316726 579718961

Liter 20302124 20521064 22936371 24501800 28459086 2

Koyana

(Cow &

Buffalo) Average

Rate 12.68 14.67 16.89 18.01 20.37

Rupees 36979428 32180452 12449135 8070464 17715425

Liter 4602439 3530073 1161312 669512 1434828 3

Javali

(Cow

Milk) Average

Rate 8.03 9.67 10.72 12.05 12.35

Page 47: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

201

Sr.

No

Union/

Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Rupees 47971537 52774156 55717362 63607077 72909447

Liter 3598091 3531062 3352537 3417678 3548019 4

Patan

(Cow &

Buffalo) Average

Rate 13.33 14.95 16.62 18.61 20.55

Rupees 105635230 75878256 47791296 87186480 73353518

Liter 10705620 7140290 3963034 7173699 5343427 5 Phaltan

(Cow) Average

Rate 9.86 10.62 12.05 12.15 13.72

Rupees 2747992 12006094 15704120 17045417

Liter 193454 735217 918906 826155 6

Shiv-

Shambhu

(Cow &

Buffalo) Average

Rate 14.20 16.33 18.09 20.63

Source- Annual report of concerning union.

The table 5.33 shows the average milk sale rate of all the co-operative

unions under study from 2005-06 to 2009-10 (yearly sale / total liter of milk

sold) form the above table it is pointed out that the average milk sale rate of all

Page 48: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

202

the unions is also showing the increasing trend over the last 5 years as the table

5.37 also show the same trend in the average purchase rate.

Koyana, Patan and Shiv-shambhu unions are selling both cow and

buffalo milk. In the year 2009-10 the average milk sales rate is the highest in

case of Shiv-shambhu union Rs.20.63. In case of Khandala, Javali and Phaltan,

selling cow milk, the average milk sales rate in case of Khandala union in the

year 2009-10 is the highest. However, to the year 2007-08 it was 15.44 and

13.95 in the year 2009-10.

Table No.5.34

Average Purchase, Sales Rate: Margin Comparison

Sr.

No

Year

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Sales rate 8.97 10.86 15.44 13.39 13.95

Purchase

rate 7.60 8.78 10.22 12.07 12.58 1 Khandala

Margin 1.37 2.08 5.22 1.32 1.37

Sales rate 12.68 14.67 16.89 18.01 20.37

Purchase

rate 10.90 12.67 14.24 16.03 18.39 2 Koyana

Margin 1.78 2.00 2.65 1.98 1.98

Sales rate 8.03 9.67 10.72 12.05 12.35

Purchase

rate 7.82 8.92 10.55 11.93 12.37 3 Javali

Margin 0.21 0.75 0.17 0.12 0.15

Sales rate 13.33 14.95 16.62 18.61 20.55

Purchase

rate 11.41 13.28 14.58 16.48 18.03 4 Patan

Margin 1.92 1.67 2.04 2.13 2.52

Sales rate 9.86 10.62 12.05 12.15 13.72

Purchase

rate 8.04 8.75 9.67 9.89 10.27 5 Phaltan

Margin 1.82 1.87 2.38 2.56 3.45

Sales rate 14.20 16.33 18.09 20.63

Purchase

rate 14.20 15.22 17.09 18.95 6

Shiv-

Shambhu

Margin 0.00 1.11 1.00 1.68

Page 49: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

203

Table 5.34 shows the comparison of average purchase rate to sales rate

and margin of the six dairy co-operative unions. The average sells and purchase

rate are higher in case of Koyana, Patan and Shiv-shambhu union as compared

to Khandala, Javali and Phaltan union.

Patan union has higher margin 2.52 paisa in 2009-10 as compared to

0.10 paisa in 2005-06, follow that Koyana union margin is 1.98 paisa in 2009-

10 as compared to 1.78 paisa in 2005-06. Khandala and Phaltan union margin

is fluctuating year by year 1.12 paisa to 2.08 paisa. There is lowest margin of

Javali and Shiv-shambhu union.

From this table we can conclude that except Koyana union all other

unions procure milk, process it and sell it to other unions. Only Koyana union

manufactured milk by products just like Lassi, Flavour milk, Pedha, Ice-cream

etc.

Page 50: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

204

Table No. 5.35

Unions Producing Milk by Product (Yes/ No)

Sr. No. Name Of Unions Milk By Product

1 Khandala No

2 Koyana Yes

3 Javali No

4 Patan No

5 Phaltan No

6 Shiv-Shambu No

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table 5.35 shows union producing milk by – products.(Yes/No) The

above table shows whether the union under study, produce by products like

Amrakhand, Basundi, Shrikhand etc. The above table points out the facts that

only Koyana union produces wide range of milk by- product.

Table No.5.36

Milk Product Profile of Koyana Dairy Co-operative Union Karad.

Sr.

No Product Name 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Shrikhand

Use of Milk (Liter) 73350 65350 73100 70100 107570

Production and sale

(Kg) 34076 31578 35358 41477 51595

Production

Expenses((Rs) 197100 191724 209608 56812 663569

Total

Expenditure(Rs) 1498120 1629425 1380469 1913800 3245927

Sale(Rs) 2045160

(0.79)

1894680

(0.62)

1944690

(0.50)

2903390

(0.65)

4643550

(0.80)

Profit(Rs) 286322

(0.11)

265255

(0.08)

291703

(0.07)

580678

(0.13)

722330

(0.12)

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

Page 51: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

205

Sr.

No Product Name 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

2 Amrakhand

Use of Milk (Liter) 73350 65350 73100 77100 107500

Production and sale

(Kg) 5932 6402 6980 8863 10734

Production Expenses

(Rs) 32387 191724 41378 56812 138050

Total

Expenditure(Rs) 260718 330343 272517 4089449 675293

Sale(Rs) 355920

(0.13)

384120

(0.12)

376920

(0.09)

614519

(0.13)

966060

(0.16)

Profit(Rs) 49828

(0.01)

53776

(0.01)

56538

(0.01)

132945

(0.03)

150276

(0.02)

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

3 Basundi

Use of Milk (Liter) 47120 77910 70836 91712 69600

Production and sale

(Kg) 20211 21304 24245 26646 31375

Production Expenses

(Rs) 923103 209731 376198 412278 679850

Total

Expenditure(Rs) 1912623 1923751 1792917 2797830 2698250

Sale(Rs) 2223980

(0.86)

2236920

(0.74)

2109315

(0.54)

3197520

(0.72)

3137500

(0.54)

Profit(Rs)

311357

(0.12)

313168

(0.10)

316397

(0.08)

399690

(0.09)

439250

(0.07)

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

4 Pedha

Use of Milk (Liter) 78760 74750 51120 69915 122840

Production and sale

(Kg) 19090 22018 25702 28247 30939

Production Expenses

(Rs) 1559653 154370 179168 271083 1418819

Page 52: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

206

Sr.

No Product Name 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Total Expenditure

(Rs) 1559653 1798871 1201568 1949043 4981179

Sale (Rs)

1813550

(0.70)

2091710

(0.69)

1413610

()

2259760

(0.51)

5414325

(0.93)

Profit (Rs)

253897

(0.09)

925839

(0.30)

212041

(0.36)

310717

(0.07)

433146

(0.07)

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

5 Lassi

Use of Milk (Liter) 6282 12100 10100 15115 11600

Production and sale

(Liter) 13792 17436 17436 27517 23947

Production Expenses

(Rs) 296140 108074 94412 157350 238328

Total Expenditure

(Rs) 296140 374874 296412 550340 574728

Sale (Rs)

3488400

(1.35)

435900

(0.14)

348720

(0.09)

963095

(0.21)

909986

(0.15)

Profit (Rs)

52260

(0.02)

61026

(0.02)

52308

(0.01)

412755

(0.09)

335258

(0.05)

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

6 Flavor Milk

Use of Milk (Liter) 37832 40414 40612 45475 40714

Production and

sale(Kg) 36832 36488 41463 457272 42352

Production Expenses 819512 205678 120568 90078 291786

Total Expenditure

(Rs) 819512 81858 729748 1134528 1228208

Sale (Rs)

920800

(0.35)

912200

(0.30)

829260

(0.21)

1654520

(0.37)

1736432

(0.29)

Profit (Rs)

101288

(0.03)

100342

(0.03)

99511

(0.02)

519992

(0.11)

508224

(0.08)

Page 53: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

207

Sr.

No Product Name 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

7 Butter

Use of Milk (Liter) 375105 547404 233310 199813 46980

Production and sale 113091 113598 71882 79038 12542

Production Expenses 4752572 768823 833538 2005574 482004

Total Expenditure 12629777 12811711 5499358 9800712 1844424

Sale

13435933

(5.21)

13629480

(4.52)

6470280

(1.67)

1024940

(0.23)

1882050

(0.32)

Profit

806156

(0.31)

817768

(0.27)

970542

(0.25)

474228

(0.10)

37626

(0.01)

Total sale(Rs) 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

Total by product Profit

1861109

(0.72)

1904177

(0.63)

1999041

(0.51)

2831005

(0.64)

2626110

(0.45)

Total by product Sale

24283743

(9.43)

21585010

(7.17)

13492795

(3.48)

12617744

(2.85)

18689903

(3.22)

Total sale 257427129

(100)

300978589

(100)

387298296

(100)

441316726

(100)

579718961

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table No.5.36 examines the milk product produces by Koyana union

Karad. There were seven milk by product produced by Koyana union these are

Shrikhand, Amrakhand, Basundi, Pedha, lassi, flavour milk and butter etc.

Referring horizontal figures of profit of all milk products as well as total

profit implies that Koyana union was successful in getting profit during 2005-

06 to 2009-10.

In case of Shrikhand sales price is higher than total expenditure in all

years due to union is having profit i.e. Rs.722330 in 2009-10 as compared to

Rs.286322 in 2005-06. Considering the second milk product Amrakhand shows

Page 54: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

208

total sales price was greater than expenditure. So firm was success to achieve

Rs.150276 in 2009-10 as compared to Rs.49828 in 2005-06. It net added to

profit Rs.100448 during 200-06 to 2009-10.

In case of Basundi the growth rate is 41 percent from 2005-06 to 2009-

10. The profit was Rs 439250 in 2009-10 as compared to Rs.311357 in 2005-

06.

In respect of Pedha profit was increased Rs.433146 in 2009-10 as

compared to Rs.253897 in total profit in 2005-06. It means 70 percent increase

in total profit in 2009-10. As well as in case of lassi profit figures indicate that

there was fluctuating trend was found i.e. Rs.52260 in 2005-06, Rs.61026 in

2006-07, Rs.52308 in 2007-08, Rs.412755 in 2008-09 and Rs. 335258 in 2009-

10 respectively.

It is observed from the flavour milk product figure profit was Rs.508224

in 2009-10 as compared to Rs.101288 in Koyana union. In other words, 401

percent increase in profit.

The last one milk product butter shows profit from butter was

continuously decreasing i.e.Rs.806156 in 2005-06, Rs.817768 in 2006-07,

Rs.970542 in 2007-08, Rs.474228 in 2008-09 and Rs.37626 in 2009-10. The

net decrease in profit is Rs.468530 from 2005-06 to 2009-10.

Considering profit figures of all milk products together, out of seven

products six products are continuously increasing trend in profit but the butter

is exception for that because profit was decreased 95 in 2009-10 as compared

to 2005-06. Remaining milk products such as lassi and flavour milk are

achieving profit more than 400 percent. In case of Shrikhand, Amrakhand

growth is more than 150 percent and finally, Basundi and Pedha are having 41

percent and 70 percent growth from 2005-06 to 2009-10

Page 55: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

209

Table No.5.37

Facilities Provided by the Unions; Department Wise

Sr.

No.

Name Of

Unions Transportation

Petrol

Pump

Ice

Factory

Cattle

Feed

Veterinary

Department

1 Khandala No No No No No

2 Koyana Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

3 Javali No No Yes Yes No

4 Patan No No No Yes Yes

5 Phaltan No No Yes Yes No

6 Shiv-

Shambu No No No No No

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table 5.37 shows the various facilities provided by the union under

study. Such as Transportation, Petrol pump, ice factory, cattle feed, Veterinary

services etc. From the above table it is cleared that Khandala and shivshambhu

union do not provide any of the above facilities/services. Koyana union provide

all the facilities .Javali union has only ice factory and cattle feed provisions. In

case of Patan union, cattle feed, Veterinary facilities are provided. There is

provision for ice factory and cattle feed in Phaltan union.

Table No.5. 38

Ice Factory; Cost comparison.

(150 kg Per Cube)

Ice Factory

Production Category 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

2008-

09 2009-10

Production 148394 107154 22968.89 2474 1724.194

Cost ( Rs) 8903690 6429260 1447040 160780 124142 Koyana

Per Ice cube

Cost ( Rs) 60.00 60.00 63.00 65.00 72.00

Production 11625 10586 6622 490 -

Cost ( Rs) 723907 915340 775800 62230 - Javali

Per Ice cube

Cost 62.27 86.47 117.15 127.00

Production 6457 4055 130 986 -

Cost ( Rs) 451990 373060 15860 142970 - Phaltan

Per Ice cube

Cost ( Rs) 70.00 92.00 122.00 145.00

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 56: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

210

Table No.5.38 Shows Koyana, Javali and Phaltan unions have there own

separate ice factory, The table shows the production and the cost per ice cube

of these unions .From the above table it is clear that the cost per ice cube in all

these unions showing increasing trend year to year, in the year 2009-10 the ice

factory of Javali and Phaltan has not been working/operating, where as the ice

factory of Phaltan union lease to the private union. The production of ice being

used in Koyana union only.

Table No.5.39

Koyana Petrol Pump; Comparative statements (Figures in Rs)

Sr.

No Petrol Pump 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Petrol ( Rs) 11967021

(20.08)

14015567

(24.19)

15015711

(26.08)

17942383

(28.20)

19659812

(29.90)

2 Diesel ( Rs) 47295628

(79.38)

43223721

(74.61)

42058498

(73.05)

44864968

(70.52)

45247723

(68.81)

3 Oil ( Rs) 321905

(0.54)

692644

(1.20)

503064

(0.87)

814062

(1.28)

852059

(1.30)

4 Total Purchase

( Rs)

59584554

(100)

57931932

(100)

57577273

(100)

63621413

(100)

65759594

(100)

5 Management

Expenses 41229o9 419299 412899 435810 484172

6 Total

Expenses 60916175 58546061 58543228 64295567 66533836

7 Total Sale 61018735 58894682 58910407 64854452 67144180

8 Loss/profit

% to sale

102560

(0.16)

348621

(0.59)

367179

(0.62)

558885

(0.86)

610344

(0.90) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table No.5.39 Shows the Koyana union has its own petrol pump. The

above table is a comparative statement of total purchase of Petrol, Diesel, Oil.

Total expenses incurred and total sales made ,and income earn on year 2005-06

to 2009-10.The total purchases and total expenses, sales and profit show the

increasing trend over all the year

Page 57: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

211

Table No.5.40

Purchase, Sales and Profit of Cattle Feed Department

(Figures in Rs)

Sr.

No

Cattle Feed

Department Category 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Total Sale 3816733

(92.94)

5161119

(92.93)

5670591

(97.09)

4600008

(99.80)

4337629

(100)

Total

Porches

3574783

(93.03)

4874822

(92.34)

5446766

(97.02)

4518629

(99.82)

3955574

(100) 1 Koyana

Profit 241950

(91.63)

286297

(99.66)

223825

(96.10)

81379

(98.88)

382055

(100)

Total Sale 234547

(5.71)

157688

(2.84)

149847

(2.57)

2800

(0.06)

Total

Perches

219000

(5.70)

165506

(3.14)

140760

(2.51)

2700

(0.06) 2 Javali

Profit 15547

(5.89)

-7818

9087

(3.90)

100

(0.12)

Total Sale 31500

(0.77)

48900

(0.88)

6320

(0.14)

Total

Parches

26200

(0.68)

47920

(0.91)

5500

(0.12) 3 Patan

Profit 5300

(2.01)

980

(0.34)

820

(1.00)

Total Sale 23971

(0.58)

185888

(3.35)

20219

(0.35)

Total

Perches

22719

(0.59)

191046

(3.62)

26432

(0.47) 4 Phaltan

Profit 1252

(0.47)

-5158

-6213

Total Sale 4106751

(100)

5553595

(100)

5840657

(100)

4609128

(100)

4337629

(100)

Total

Parches

3842702

(100)

5279294

(100)

5613958

(100)

4526829

(100)

3955574

(100) Total

Profit 264049

(100)

287277

(100)

232912

(100)

82299

(100)

382055

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Table No.5.40 ana1yze that the Koyana, Javali, Patan and Phaltan union

have the own separate cattle feed department ,shows purchase and sale of cattle

feed are made, The percentage of profit margin from this department is highest

in case of Koyana union, Where as it is hovering around 1% to 6% in case of

other unions.

Page 58: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

212

Table No.5.41

Live Stock development Facilities Provided to the member in 2009-2010

(Numbers)

Sr.

No

Name of

Union Category

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

2009-

10

1 Koyana Insemination 17441 18870 18093 17491 25062

Purchase of

Cow/Buffalo 149 112

Veterinary

services 512

Vaccination 1507 2262 2530 500 5582

Conferences 3 5 20 25 27

Demo 6 10 14 20 8

Kadba kutti

Machine 272 292 58

2 Patan Insemination

Purchase of

Cow/Buffalo 106 11 41 144 171

Conferences 1 1

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.41 shows the facilities provided by the unions to their

members for the development and maintenance of live stock. Like (cross

fertilization, purchase of Cow and buffalos, provision of veterinary services,

demonstrations, conferences, kadaba crashing machine etc. vaccination etc. of

the 6 unions under the study only two unions i.e. Koyana and Patan are

providing the various facilities for the purpose of development and

maintenances of the live stock in case of Koyana union it is observed that it is

taking keen interest in cross fertilization, vaccination and for orientation of its

members, holding conferences and organizing demonstrations.

The Patan union acts as a guarantor on the behalf of its members for the

purchase of Cow and Buffalos. This union is not providing the facilities such as

Page 59: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

213

vaccination, veterinary services, cross fertilization etc. for the maintenances

and development of the live stock.

Table No. 5.42

Services: Level of member’s satisfaction

(Figures in number)

Sr. No Name of Union Satisfied Unsatisfied Total

1 Khandala 5 12 17

2 Koyana 12 50 62

3 Javali 6 13 19

4 Patan 8 12 20

5 Phaltan 5 10 15

6 Shiv-Shambhu 0 12 12

total 36 109 145

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table highlights the level of members satisfaction i.e. satisfied

/ unsatisfied in respect of various services rendered by their respective unions.

In order to find out the level of members satisfaction 20 percent of the member

societies of each union were interviewed by the researcher. The table 5.42

points out that of the 145 members societies interviewed, 109 member societies

expressed dissatisfaction in respect of services given by their respective unions

(75 %). It indicates that most of the members are not satisfied with the services

render and the quality of services rendered.

Table No 5.43

The audit class of the Unions: Year wise

Audit Class obtained

Sr.

no

Name of

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala .B B B B .B

2 Koyana A. A A A A

3 Javali B B B C B

4 Patan A. A A A A

5 Phaltan .B B B B .B

6 Shiv-

Shambhu C C C C C Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 60: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

214

The annual accounts of the co-operative unit are audited by the co-

operative department and based on audit report each co-operative unit is

awarded with the audit class, For example A, B and C. The above table shows

the audit class of each union during the last 5 year i.e. 2005-06 to 2009-10.

From the above table it is observed that only Koyana and Patan unions are in

the ‘A’ audit class indicating financial soundness and transparency of activities

of these union. The Khandala and Phaltan unions are in ‘B’ audit class from the

year 2005-06 to 2009-10. The Shivshambhu union has always being in ‘C’

audit class indicating irregularities of the activities and economically non

variable.

B Financial Analysis:

Introduction:

This part of the present chapter deals with financial aspects/ analysis of

all the unions under study base on comparative statement and ratio analysis.

Table No.5.44

Paid-up Share Capital

(Figures in Rs.)

Sr.no Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Khandala

members

650710

(19.47)

78

662010

(19.17)

83

666910

(19.95)

83

675110

(20.20)

83

688510

(20.54)

83

3341250

(100)

2 Koyana

members

3615500

(17.69)

332

3924200

(19.20)

331

4238100

(20.73)

331

4539600

(22.20)

343

4118700

(20.15)

308

20436100

(100)

3 Javali

members

1735600

(19.17)

96

1731650

(19.82)

96

1751650

(20.05)

96

1756950

(20.11)

96

1756950

(20.11)

96

8732800

(100)

4 Patan

members

400100

(16.01)

107

457700

(18.32)

108

495660

(19.84)

96

546700

(21.88)

99

597900

(23.93)

99

2498000

(100)

5 Phaltan

members

3542200

(22.39)

289

3644600

(23.04)

289

3692700

(23.34)

289

3734800

(23.61)

290

1918000

(7.57)

72

15816300

(100)

6 Shivshambhu

members

63000

(20.00)

63

63000

(20.00)

63

63000

(20.00)

63

63000

(20.00)

63

63000

(20.00)

63

315000

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 61: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

215

The share capital of each union consist of

i) Capital provided by the members (Number of shares held by each

member and face value of the shares).

ii) Contribution by each member at the rate of 0.02 paisa per liter of milk

supplied by the members credited towards share capital amount ( this

amount is deducted while making the payment to the members for

the total milk supply)

iii) The amount of the share capital of each union varies in accordance with

the number of membership and milk supplied by its members. The

above table 5.41 Shows that the Koyana union has the highest share

capital compared to that of other unions. It has highest number of

members and the highest collection of milk. Being less number of

members, the Shiv-shambhu union has the lowest amount of share

capital and which remain same for the last 5 years i.e. no. increase in

the share capital in the subsequent years.

The face value of each share is Rs.10. However the Koyana union

has increased the face value of the share from Rs.10 to 100 in the last

two year.

Table No.5.45

Statutory Reserve Fund

Sr.no Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala 225398 225417 328770 328770 328770

2 Koyana 2324639 2388538 2695886 3003686 4751568

3 Javali 906952 906952 906952 906952 906952

4 Patan 262770 379620 401968 444895 517068

5 Phaltan 379775 379775 381654 381659 381659

6 Shivshambhu 21415 21415 21415 21415 21415

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Every union as per co-operative laws requires to transfer 25% of current

profit to statutory reserve fund. The above table shows the transfer made to the

reserve fund by each union from the year 2005-06 to 2009-10. The above table

Page 62: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

216

points out that Khandala, Javali, Phaltan and Shiv-shambhu unions have not

transfered 25% of current profit to the reserve fund as these union has

accumulated huge losses and current year profit adjusted to right these losses,

Koyana and Patan union had no accumulated losses and hence the regularly

transfered 25% of the current profit to the reserve fund. The reserve fund of

these unions also show an increasing trend over the last 5 years being increased

profit.

Table No.5.46

Total Reserve Fund

Sr

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Khandala 1866840

(20.06)

1856859

(19.95)

1860212

(19.99)

1860212

(19.99)

1860212

(19.99)

9304335

(100)

2 Koyana 33447482

(10.17)

87866764

(26.73)

87696389

(26.68)

58590447

(17.83)

61003771

(18.56)

328604853

(100)

3 Javali 5447169

(19.83)

5501547

(19.93)

5549438

(20.10)

5550393

(20.11)

5550488

(20.11)

27599035

(100)

4 Patan 1646837

(16.29)

1884296

(18.64)

1992619

(19.71)

2164360

(21.22)

2517183

(23.92)

1015295

(100)

5 Phaltan 9105143

(17.41)

9582461

(18.32)

13757620

(26.30)

9770413

(18.68)

10081146

(19.27)

52296783

(100)

6 Shivshambhu 21415

(20.00)

21415

(20.00)

21415

(20.00)

21415

(20.00)

21415

(20.00)

107075

(100)

Total 51534886

(12.04)

106713342

(24.93)

110877693

(25.90)

77957240

(18.21)

80934215

(18.90)

428017376

(100)

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The total reserve fund of each union consist of the statuary reserve fund

and other reserve like, building and equipment fund investment allowance

fund, dividend equalization fund, Rebate etc. the above table 5.46 Shows the

size of total reserve funds of all the unions in the district from the above table.

It is observed that there is no significant change in the size of total reserve fund

of Khandala, Javali, Phaltan and Shivshambhu union as they had huge

accumulated losses. In case of Koyana and Patan unions an increasing trend is

noticed in the size of total reserve fund.

Page 63: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

217

Table No.5.47

Deposits

Sr.No Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala - - - - -

2 Koyana 2171725 2161596 2168457 2556381 4205757

3 Javali - - - - -

4 Patan - - - - -

5 Phaltan - - - - -

6 Shivshambhu - - - - -

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.47 shows deposits accepted by the unions from the

above table it is observed that except Koyana union no other union has

accepted the deposits. The Koyana union accepts saving bank deposits, other

deposits and deposits from the member societies. The table also highlight the

points that the liabilities in respect of deposits shows the increasing trend.

Table No. 5.48

Loans of the unions (liability side)

Sr. no Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala - - - - -

2 Koyana 17878487

(80.70)

(100)

12607545

(69.22)

(70.51)

15840153

(80.84)

(88.60)

18761736

(85.29)

(104.94)

35933455

(92.53)

(200.78)

3 Javali 1164704

(5.26)

(100)

1823153

(10.01)

(156.53)

1325650

(6.76)

(113.82)

1427720

(6.49)

(122.58

1256184

(3.23)

(107.85)

4 Patan - - - - -

5 Phaltan 3110849

(14.04)

(100)

3782442

(20.76)

(121.59)

2429678

(12.40)

(70.10)

1808603

(8.22)

(58.13)

1644994

(4.23)

(52.87)

6 Shivshambhu - - - - -

Total 22154040

(100)

18213140

(100)

19595481

(100)

21998059

(100)

38834633

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 64: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

218

The above table shows the loan position of the unions under study for

the last 5 year i.e. 2005-06 to 2009-10. The Khandala, Patan and Shiv-shambhu

have no liability in respect of loan indicating that these unions has not obtain

any sort of loans. In case of Koyana union the loan amount showing the most

uneven trend in the year 2009-10 the amount of loan was Rs.3,59,33,455

almost double of the loan of 2005-06. There was so in uneven trend noticed in

case of Javali and Phaltan union.

Table No. 5.49

Net Profit

Sr.No. Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala - 5437 19258 90246 26089

2 Koyana 214633 780612 215475 584494 794143

3 Javali 101184 - - - -

4 Patan 177816 89205 171576 178499 220160

5 Phaltan - - - 1468220 352990

6 Shivshambhu - - - - 39918

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.49 highlights the profit made by each union during the

last 5 years i.e. 2005-06 to 2009-10.

The Khandala union had no net profit in the year 2005-06 in the year

2006-07 it made. Profit of Rs. 5437 (after having adjusted Rs. 400,000 against

accumulated losses 2005-06) which increase to 26089 in the year 2009-10,

showing on increasing trend.

In the year 2005-06 Koyana union made a profit of Rs. 214633. Which

increase to Rs. 794143 in the year 2009-10 i.e. almost 3 times increased. The

net profit of this union indicates an increasing trend.

Javali union made a profit of Rs.101,184 in the year 2005-06 however,

there was no profit from the year 2006-07 onwards.

Page 65: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

219

The net profit of Patan union shows an increasing trend i.e. from

Rs.1,77,816 in the year 2005-06 to Rs. 2,20,160 in the year 2009-10 i.e almost

1.5 times increase.

There was no net profit for the first three year i.e. 2005-06 to 2007-08 in

case of the Phaltan union made profit in the year 2008-09 and 2009-10.In the

year 2008-09 profit was Rs. 14,68,220 which graphically reduce to Rs.

3,52,990 in the year 2009-10.

The Shiv-shambhu union made a negligible profit in the year 2009-10.

Thus it is clear from the above table that except Koyana and Patan unions no

other union has made significant profit.

Table No. 5.50

Accumulated Losses

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table shows the accumulated losses of the union. The

accumulated losses are made of last year balance plus (debit balance) the

current years losses. The Koyana and Patan union have no accumulated losses

which indeed is a good sign.

The Khandala union had accumulated losses of Rs. 6,90,559 in the year

2005-06, in the year 2006-07 it reduced to Rs. 2,90,559 after being Rs. 400,000

adjusted from P/L account. Which remained the same against 2007-08.

However, it again increased in the year 2008-09 and 2009-10. This indicate the

Khandala union has accumulated huge losses.

The accumulated losses of Javali union are also showing increasing

trend of the accumulated losses.

Sr.no Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala 690559 290559 290559 690559 1090559

2 Koyana - - - - -

3 Javali 973876 1722664 5631839 6102573 6268868

4 Patan - - - - -

5 Phaltan 8282078 11921118 14680273 13266094 12913109

6 Shivshambhu 1158308 1173139 1203126 1203126 1203126

Page 66: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

220

The accumulated losses in case of Phaltan union are after adjusting the

PLC on sale of scrap i.e. the profit or loss are adjusted towards the accumulated

losses ( deducted and added respectively). It is also showing increasing trend.

In case of Shiv-shambhu union the accumulated losses also show

increasing trend. Thus except Koyana and Patan union all of the unions are

facing the serious problem of accumulated losses. It throws light on the

working of these unions.

Table No.5.51

Total Current Liabilities: Union and year wise

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Khandala 1659954

(4.09)

(100)

1220209

(2.61)

(73.50)

1219758

(2.00)

(73.48)

1793360

(2.78)

(108.03)

1497249

(2.13)

(90.20)

2.73

2 Koyana 20080374

(49.53)

(100)

23509932

(50.32)

(117.08)

34078901

(55.89)

(169.71)

36566319

(56.77)

(182.10)

40131487

(57.29)

(199.85)

53.96

3 Javali 1152517

(2.84)

(100)

1856856

(3.97)

(161.11)

6412447

(10.51)

(556.38)

4355620

(6.76)

(377.92)

4761394

(6.80)

(413.13)

6.17

4 Patan 4533739

(11.18)

(100)

4482954

(9.59)

(98.88)

5079216

(8.33)

(112.03)

5259442

(8.16)

(116.00)

9947066

(14.20)

(219.40)

10.29

5 Phaltan 12170229

(30.02)

(100)

14407813

(30.83)

(118.38)

12738590

(20.89)

(104.67)

14896935

(23.13)

(122.40)

13440636

(19.19)

(110.43)

24.81

6 Shivshambhu 947144

(2.33)

(100)

1243767

(2.66)

(131.31)

1447861

(2.37)

(152.86)

1539127

(2.39)

(162.50)

270248

(0.38)

(28.53)

2.03

Total 40543957

(100)

46721531

(100)

60976773

(100)

64410803

(100)

70048080

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The current liabilities represent the short term obligations of the concern

to be met within the span of 12 months. The current liabilities include the short

term liabilities and provisions.

The above table Shows the total current liabilities of the each union in

the district and the year wise percentage of each unions current liabilities to

total current liabilities of all the unions and also the average percentage of

current liabilities over the last 5 years i.e. 2005-06 to 2009-10.

Page 67: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

221

In the year 2005-06 Koyana union has almost 50 percent of the total

current liabilities of all the unions in the district. Which is followed by the

Phaltan union (30 percent ) and this trend is continues for the rest of the years,

the current liabilities of Koyana are showing increasing trend i.e. 49.53 percent

in the year 2005-06 to 57.29 percent in the year 2009-10. And the current

liabilities of Koyana itself has almost doubled in the year 2009-10 to (199.85)

compared to the current liabilities of this union of the year 2005-06. The

current liabilities seem to be major problem of Javali and Patan union. In case

of Javali its current liabilities has increased almost 4 times in the year 2009-10

compared to the year 2005-06. In case of Phaltan union current liabilities are

showing decreasing trend over the years. The current liabilities of Khandala

union are also showing decreasing trend.

Table No. 5.52

Total Current Assets

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total

1 Khandala 2507128

(5.44)

(100)

2672761

(5.55)

(106.60)

2691701

(5.42)

(107.36)

2820527

(5.32)

(112.50)

2186626

(3.83)

(87.21)

5.07

2 Koyana 25103443

(54.48)

(100)

26479344

(54.99)

(105.48)

31189498

(62.84)

(124.24)

29846972

(56.34)

(118.89)

38014893

(63.09)

(151.43)

58.35

3 Javali 7638738

(16.57)

(100)

7644509

(15.87)

(100.07)

6048693

(12.18)

(79.18)

6217904

(11.74)

(81.40)

6189563

(10.27)

(81.03)

13.33

4 Patan 3039086

(6.60)

(100)

3948388

(8.20)

(129.92)

5243009

(10.56)

(172.51)

5471497

(10.33)

(180.03)

9973741

(16.55)

(328.18)

10.45

5 Phaltan 6788020

(14.73)

(100)

6173503

(12.82)

(90.94)

3046800

(6.14)

(44.88)

7115598

(13.43)

(104.82)

3507982

(5.82)

(51.67)

10.58

6 Shivshambhu 996732

(2.16)

(100)

1233810

(2.56)

(123.78)

1408572

(2.83)

(141.32)

1503233

(2.84)

(150.81)

381955

(0.63)

(38.32)

2.20

Total 46073147

(100)

48152315

(100)

49628272

(100)

52975731

(100)

60254760

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.52 Show year wise total current assets. Of each union

in the district over the last 5 years and also shows the year wise percentage of

current assets of each union to the total current assets of all the unions in the

district.

Page 68: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

222

Considering the percentage of current asset to the total current asset the

table shows that the Koyana union has largest size of current assets as

compared to other union in the district. Which is followed by the Javali union.

The percentage of Shiv-shambhu current asset is very less if compared with

that of other unions.

The total current asset of Khandala unions shows the increasing trend

from the year 2005-06 to 2008-09 i.e (100 to 112.50). However the current

asset of this union declined to 87.21 percent in the year 2009-10.

The current asset of Koyana union are increasing year by year except

2008-09. The overall it shows increasing trend (100 in the year 2005-06 to

151.43 in the year 2009-10). The current asset of Patan union almost three

times (2009-10) current asset of the year 2005-06. The uneven trend in the

current asset is noticed in the case of Phaltan, Javali and Shiv-shambhu unions.

Current Assets of each unions:

Table No. 5.53

1) Khandala

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Average

%

1 Cash and Bank

balance

3027

(0.12)

320175

(11.98)

12615

(0.46)

105505

(3.74)

656878

(30.04)

9.26

2 Other Assets 424824

(16.94)

388644

(14.54)

390283

(14.50)

333053

(11.81)

308095

(14.08)

14.37

3 Debtors/

Receivables

1858349

(74.12)

1873478

(70.09)

2288803

(85.03)

2381969

(84.45)

1221653

(55.87)

73.91

4 Closing Stock 220928

(8.81)

90464

(3.38)

- - -

5 Total 2507128

(100)

2672761

(100)

2691701

(100)

2820527

(100)

2186626

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

In the year 2005-06 the debtors constitute the major proportion of the

total current asset of the union (74.12). The percent of stock to the total current

asset of the union is just 8.81 this indicate that the large amount is due to the

union from the debtors.

In the year 2006-07 the highest percent is that of debtors (70-09). The

percent of stock to the current asset reduce to 3.38. However, there is no stock

for the year 2007-08 to 2009-10.

Page 69: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

223

In the year 2007-08 the total current asset of this union is made up off.

Major proportion of debtors (85.03). In the year 2008-09 the percent of debtor

to the total current asset is also highest (84.85). This percent has reduced to

55.87 in the year 2009-10 from the above table it is clear that debtors the major

current asset of this union. Therefore Khandala union should pay serious

attention toward collection of debtors. The good sign is that this union has no

stock in the current asset. The percent of cash and bank balance shows uneven

trend i.e. from 0.12 in the year 2005-06 to 30.04 the year 2009-10. The average

proportion of debtors is almost 74 percent of the total current asset which is

matter of serious concern.

Table No.5.54

2) Koyana

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Average

%

1 Cash and

Bank

balance

5028636

(20.03)

3117068

(11.77)

2964230

(9.50)

4491587

(15.05)

2573055

(6.77)

12.62

2 Other

Assets

8096167

(32.25)

8044846

(30.30)

8587582

(27.53)

5721882

(19.17)

5804238

(15.26)

24.90

3 Debtors/

Receivables

8300288

(33.06)

11358188

(42.89)

14937326

(47.89)

14954487

(50.10)

25000028

(65.76)

47.94

4 Closing

Stock

3678352

(14.65)

3979242

(15.03)

4700360

(15.07)

4679016

(15.68)

4637572

(12.20)

14.52

5 Total 25103443

(100)

26479344

(100)

31189498

(100)

29846972

(100)

38014893

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

In the year 2005-06 the percent of debtors to the current asset is the

highest (33-06) followed by the percent of other current asset 32.25. The stock

occupies almost 15 percent of the current asset. In the year (2006-07) the

debtors are 42.89 percent to the total current asset and the percent of stock

remain somewhat same.

From the above table it is pointed out that the stock form 15 percent,

debtors 48 percent and other assets nearly 25 percent. The percent of debtors to

the current asset shows increasing trend, where as uneven trend is noticed in

other current asset. From the above table the management of debtors /

receivables and inventory are major problem of the union.

Page 70: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

224

Table No.5.55

3) Javali

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Average

%

1 Cash and Bank

balance

454439

(5.95)

117974

(1.54)

94637

(1.56)

88682

(1.42)

584564

(9.44)

3.98

2 Other Assets 4394456

(57.52)

4166374

(54.50)

3899146

(64.46)

3688491

(59.32)

3502852

(56.59)

58.48

3 Debtors/

Receivables

2707274

(35.44)

3228359

(42.33)

2035143

(33.64)

2424157

(38.98)

2085573

(33.69)

36.79

4 Closing Stock 82569

(1.08)

131802

(1.72)

19767

(0.33)

16574

(0.27)

16574

(0.27)

0.73

5 Total 7638738

(100)

7644509

(100)

6048693

(100)

6217904

(100)

6189563

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The total current asset of Javali is made upon to major current asset i.e.

other current asset (58.48) 36.79 average percent. The inventory management

is not serious problem as an inventory stock is showing decreasing trend over

the years. The average percent of cash and bank balances to the current asset of

the union is almost 4 percent, showing uneven trend, this trend is also noticed

in case of debtors / receivers and stock.

Table No.5.56

4) Patan

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Average

%

1 Cash and

Bank balance

310748

(10.22)

130962

(3.32)

533792

(10.18)

226079

(4.13)

320220

(3.21)

6.21

2 Other Assets 797576

(26.24)

952964

(24.13)

1220594

(23.28)

1363214

(24.91)

1334590

(13.38)

22.38

3 Debtors/

Receivables

1895026

(62.35)

2796007

(70.81)

3459388

(65.98)

3866069

(70.66)

8285283

(83.07)

70.55

4 Closing Stock 35700

(1.17)

68455

(1.73)

29235

(0.55)

16135

(0.29)

33648

(0.33)

0.81

5 Total 3039086

(100)

3948388

(100)

5243009

(100)

5471497

(100)

9973741

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

In case of Patan union also debtors and other current assets the major

portion. The receivables are showing increasing trend where as uneven trend is

notice in case of stock. In this union also debtors and other current asset is the

major current asset.

Page 71: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

225

Table No.5.57

5) Phaltan

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Average

%

1 Cash and Bank

balance

413571

(6.19)

306083

(5.02)

81188

(2.73)

75854

(1.09)

102296

(2.97)

3.06

2 Other Assets 59624

(0.89)

57107

(0.92)

35675

(1.20)

35674

(0.51)

35675

(1.03)

0.91

3 Debtors/

Receivables

6089843

(91.23)

5655885

(92.77)

2771909

(93.40)

6706278

96.26)

3228537

(93.92)

93.51

4 Closing Stock 112491

(1.68)

77214

(1.27)

79014

(2.66)

148896

(2.13)

70737

(2.06)

1.96

5 Total 6675529

(100)

6096289

100)

2967786

100)

6966702

100)

3437245

100)

100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Most of the current assets Phaltan union are made up of debtors /

Receivables. The major percent of debtors to total current asset over the last 5

years has been 93.51 percent, cash and bank balances, other current assets and

stock form a small proportion of the total current asset of the Phaltan union.

From all the above table of the respective unions, debtors / Receivables

emerge as the major current asset of all the unions. The large amount of current

asset is locked up in debtors / receivables. Interestingly the stock as a current

asset is not that much matter of serious concern.

Table No.5.58

6) Shivshambhu

Sr.

no

Union 2005-

06

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-

10

Average

%

1 Cash and Bank

balance

9172

(0.92)

7245

(0.58)

22254

(1.57)

23895

(1.59)

15175

(3.97)

1.72

2 Other Assets 244161

(24.50)

218503

(17.71)

163921

(11.64)

126789

(8.43)

126789

(33.19)

19.09

3 Debtors/

Receivables

743399

(74.58)

1008062

(81.70)

1222397

(86.78)

1352549

(89.97)

239991

(62.83)

79.17

4 Closing Stock - - - - - -

5 Total 996732

(100)

1233810

(100)

1408572

(100)

1503233

(100)

381955

(100)

(100) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

In case of Shiv-shambhu union the major current asset is debtor /

receivables, this asset accounted for almost 75 percent in the year 2005-06.

This asset also show increasing trend from the year 2005-06 (62.89) in the year

Page 72: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

226

2009-10 and average percent of debtors / receivables over the last 5 years is

79.17 percent, cash and bank balance showing increasing trend year by year. It

is clear that cash management and receivable management is a matter concern

for this union.

Table No. 5.59

Working Capital

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala 857052

(100)

1342943

(156.69)

1501686

(175.21)

1036710

(120.96)

692559

(80.80)

2 Koyana 7886219

(100)

5342654

(67.74)

21524161

(272.93)

2817568

(35.75)

17343523

(219.92)

3 Javali 7245086

(100)

6543139

(90.31)

1896851

(26.18)

1986875

(27.42)

1563369

(21.57)

4 Patan 21294

(100)

353112

(1658.26)

634516

(2979.78)

904095

(4245.77)

1266611

(5948.20)

5 Phaltan -508259 -8127203 -9556115 -7575662 -9596990

6 Shivshambhu 7604 -9957 -39289 -33894 248283

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table 5.56 shows the working capital position of all the

unions from the last 5 years, i.e. 2005-06 to 2009-10. From the above table it is

clear that the working capital position of Khandala, Javali unions is satisfactory

and adequate. The working capital position of Koyana union is satisfactory

during the first 4 year i.e from 2005-06 to 2008-09 in the year 2009-10 as the

current liabilities are more than the current asset. It has inadequate working

capital i.e minus working capital.

In case of Patan union there was no working capital. In the year 2005-06

and 2006-07. It has adequate working capital for the remaining three years but

showing decline trend in the size of the working capital. The management

therefore should pay attention toward the management of current asset and

current liabilities.

The Phaltan union has no working capital for all the years and not only

that and increasing trend is noticed in decline working capital. The working

capital position of the Phaltan union is adequate and satisfactory. The

Page 73: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

227

management therefore should find out the ways and means to improve the

working capital position of the union.

In case of Shiv-shambhu union it has the working capital in the year

2005-06 and 2009-10 but there was no working capital during the year 2006-07

to 2008-09.

Table No. 5.60

Total Annual Turn over

Sr.

no

Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala 10093382

(100)

12617307

(125.00)

14439152

(143.05)

23493348

(232.75)

25474868

(252.39)

2 Koyana 365499542

(100)

406664564

(111.26)

472455293

(129.26)

539997944

(147.74)

674729368

(184.60)

3 Javali 43348755

(100)

7064984

(16.29)

17634370

(40.68)

8362284

(19.29)

20877504

(48.16)

4 Patan 48114611

(100)

52981986

(110.11)

55847272

(116.07)

63677253

(132.34)

73006109

(151.73)

5 Phaltan 106181840

(100)

77007904

(72.52)

48037602

(45.24)

87524307

(82.42)

73641396

(69.35)

6 Shivshambhu Nil 2747993

(100)

12054232

(438.65)

16250204

(591.34)

17532033

(637.99) Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The above table shows the total turn over per annum of all the unions

over the last 5 year i.e. 2005-06 to 2009-10. Except Javali, Phaltan unions the

annual turn over of other unions showing increasing trend over the years. The

annual tern over of Javali union is most fickle and showing uneven trend.

Which is also in the case of Phaltan union.

Table No. 5.61

Dividend

Sr.No Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala - - - - -

2 Koyana 2% 3% 2% 4% 6%

3 Javali - - -- - -

4 Patan 15% 15% 15% 15% 15%

5 Phaltan - - - - -

6 Shivshambhu - - - - -

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 74: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

228

The above table shows the rate at which the dividend has been paid by

each union during the last 5 years. From the above table it is pointed out that

only Koyana and Patan union have paid the dividend to the members from year

2005-06 to 2009-10. The dividend rate in case of Koyana union was just 2

percent in the year 2005-06 which increased to 6 percent in the year 2009-10.

The Patan union is able to pay stable dividend rate of 15 percent per annum.

Table No. 5.62

Current Ratio

Sr.

no Union

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

2009-

10 AGR

1 Khandala 1.51:1 1.98:1 2.33:1 1.57:1 1.46:1 1.75

2 Koyana 1.39:1 1.22:1 2.75:1 1.09:1 1.57:1 1.60

3 Javali 7.28:1 4.32:1 1.44:1 1.45:1 1.32:1 3.20

4 Patan 1.00:1 1.07:1 1.12:1 1.17:1 1.12:1 1.09

5 Phaltan 0.59:1 0.43:1 0.24:1 0.49:1 0.28:1 0.40

6 Shivshambhu 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.97 1.91 1.16

Table 5.62 the above table shows the current ratio of each dairy co-

operative union for the last 5 year i.e. from 2005-06 to 2009-10.

In case of Khandala union the current ratio has increased from 1.51 in

the year 2005-06 to 1.98, 2.33 in 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively. However

the current ratio is showing declining trend for the year 2008-09 and 2009-10

i.e. 1.57 and 1.46 respectively. The average current ratio of this union for the

last 5 year is 1.75. The accepted standard ratio is 2:1.

In case of Koyana union the current ratio is showing declining trend and

the average current ratio of the 5 years is just 1.60 which is below the accepted

standard, indicating delicate solvency position of Koyana. This is because of

the fact that the current liabilities are increasing year by year.

In case of Javali union the current ratio was highest in the year 2005-06

(7.28) and 4.32 in the year 2006-07 but this current ratio has declined over the

next 3 years i.e. 2007-08 to 2009-10. However, overall average current ratio is

3.20 which is well above the normal standard specified, indicating sound

solvency position of this union.

Page 75: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

229

In case of Patan union the current ratio is showing increasing trend.

However the overall average current rate of the 5 years is 1.09 indicating that

solvency position of Patan is not all that sound. This is because of the fact that

the current liabilities of this union are increasing year by year.

The current ratio of Phaltan is a matter of concern as the average current

ratio is just 0.40 well below the normal standard of current ratio. Solvency

position of Phaltan union is also not sound and facing the problem of solvency.

In case of Shiv-shambhu union the average current ratio is 0.40 which is

also well below the standard ration of 2:1. This also suggest that the short term

financial position is not all that sound.

From the above table the solvency position of Javali and Khandala union

is satisfactory.

Table No.5.63

Quick Ratio

Sr.

no Union

2005-

06

2006-

07

2007-

08

2008-

09

2009-

10 AGR

1 Khandala 1.37:1 2.11:1 2.20:1 1.57:1 1.46:1 1.74:1

2 Koyana 1.16:1 0.95:1 0.92:1 0.85:1 0.83:1 0.94:1

3 Javali 6.55:1 7.40:1 1.08:1 1.83:1 1.58:1 3.68:1

4 Patan 0.66:1 0.86:1 1.02:1 1.03:1 1.00:1 0.91:1

5 Phaltan 0.70:1 0.52:1 0.26:1 0.50:1 0.28:1 0.45:1

6 Shivshambhu 1.00:1 0.99:1 0.97:1 0.97:1 1.41:1 1.07:1

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

The quick ratio is the ratio between quick asset and quick liabilities

expressing the liquidity or short term financial position of the concern. The

average quick ratio of Khandala union is 1.74. Indicating the sound liquidity

position of the union, the ideal quick ration is 1.:1.

The quick ratio of Koyana union is continuously showing declining

trend from the year 2005-06 to 2009-10 i.e. from 1.16 to 0.83. The average

quick ratio is 0.94 which well below the standard ratio of 1:1.

In case of Javali union the quick ratio was highest in the year 2006-07

(7.40) and it was 6.55 in the year 2005-06. However, this ratio is showing

Page 76: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

230

decreasing trend from the year 2007-08 to 2009-10. However the average quick

ratio, 3.68 indicating sound liquidity position of the union.

In case of Patan union the average quick ratio is 0.91 which is also

below the standard ratio of 1:1.

The quick ratio of Phaltan union is showing uneven trend and the

average quick ratio of last 5 year is 0.45.

The quick ratio of Shiv-shambhu the average quick ratio is 1.07

indicating a thin liquidity position. From the above table it is clear that the

quick ratio of Koyana, Patan and Phaltan union is not all that satisfactory and

the management of the respective unions should find out the ways and means

to improve the short term liquidity position.

Table No. 5.64

Gross Profit Ratio

Union Cate-

gory 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 AGR

Gross

profit

248099 874114 489213 833467 947734

Net sale 9872454 12611307 14439152 23493348 25474868

Khandala

Ratio 2.5% 6% 3% 3% 3%

3.5%

Gross

profit

26568886 30502136 28987243 32759703 37513077

Net sale 362648351 403883537 469424950 536674208 671489489

Koyana

Ratio 7% 7% 6% 6% 5%

6.2%

Gross

profit

1585157 332633 - 173557 733121

Net sale 44266185 40316080 - 9263254 20860930

Javali

Ratio 3.5% 08% - 1.8% 3.5%

2.4%

Gross

profit

2387544 1771592 2401598 2383585 3585279

Net sale 48078911 52913530 55818037 63661117 72972461

Patan

Ratio 4% 3% 4% 3% 4%

3.5%

Gross

profit

635254 - 841290 2089650 775426

Net sale 106069349 - 47958588 87375411 73570659

Phaltan

Ratio 0.5 - 1.7 2 1

1.3

Gross

profit

- - 48138 115813 95038

Net sale - - 12006094 15704120 17045417

Shiv

shambhu

Ratio - - 0.4 0.7 0.5

0.3

Source- Annual report of concerning unions

Page 77: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

231

The above table 5.64 shows the gross profit and the net sale of each

union and the ratio of gross profit to net sales for the last 5 years and also the

average gross profit ratio. The gross profit ratio of Khandala union is the

highest in the year 2006-07 i.e. (6 percent) and the average gross profit ratio of

the union is 3.5. This ratio is not all that satisfactory. The gross profit of

Koyana union is showing decreasing trend from 7 percent in the year 2005-06

to 5 percent in the year 2009-10. The average gross profit ratio of the last 5

years is 6:2. There is no gross profit in the year 2007-08 in case of Javali union.

However, the ratio is showing increasing trend. The average gross profit ratio is

2.40.

The average gross profit ratio of Patan is 3.5, hovering around 3 percent

to 4 percent. There was no gross profit in the year 2006-07 in case of Phaltan

union and the gross profit ratio is most flexible. The average gross profit ratio

of Phaltan is just 1.3 percent shiv-shambhu union made no gross profit for the

first two years and begin making gross profit from the year 2007-08 onward

and the average gross profit ratio of this union is below 1 percent.

Table No. 5.65

Net Profit Ratio

Sr.no Union 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

1 Khandala Loss 0.04% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1%

2 Koyana 0.05% 0.19% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1%

3 Javali 0.2% Loss Loss Loss Loss

4 Patan 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3%

5 Phaltan Loss Loss Loss 1.6% 0.4%

6 Shivshambhu - Loss Loss Loss 0.2%

The above table shows the net profit ratio of each union. The Khandala

union had no net profit during the year 2005-06 where as Javali had the net

profit in this year and no net profit for the remaining years of the study.

Page 78: Analysis and Interpretation of Dairy Co-operative Unions ...shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/34954/12/12_chapter_05.pdfThe Khandala co-operative union had 78 members in the

232

The Phaltan union had also no net profit made for the first three years.

The Shiv-shambhu union made net profit only in the last year 2009-10. Only

Koyana and Patan union have made net profit from the year 2005-06 to 2009-

10. However, it is evidence of the above table that the net profit ratio of all the

unions is just 1 percent or even below 1 percent.