# analysis of and numerical schemes for a mouse population model in hantavirus epidemics

Post on 27-Mar-2017

215 views

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago Library]On: 20 November 2014, At: 11:24Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Journal of Difference Equations and ApplicationsPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gdea20

Analysis of and numerical schemes for a mousepopulation model in Hantavirus epidemicsMingxiang Chen a & Dominic P. Clemence aa Department of Mathematics , North Carolina A&T State University , Greenboro, NC, 27411,USAPublished online: 25 Jan 2007.

To cite this article: Mingxiang Chen & Dominic P. Clemence (2006) Analysis of and numerical schemes for a mousepopulation model in Hantavirus epidemics, Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 12:9, 887-899, DOI:10.1080/10236190600779791

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10236190600779791

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gdea20http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/10236190600779791http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10236190600779791http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Analysis of and numerical schemes for a mousepopulation model in Hantavirus epidemics

MINGXIANG CHEN* and DOMINIC P. CLEMENCE

Department of Mathematics, North Carolina A&T State University, Greenboro, NC 27411, USA

(Received 20 February 2006; revised 14 April 2006; in final form 27 April 2006)

This paper considers a non-linear system of ordinary differential equations, which arises in the study ofhantavirus epidemics. The system has the property that the total population obeys the logistic equation.For this system, we use linearization and the dynamical properties of the logistic equation to analyze thedynamics of the subpopulation system. In view of the usual numerical instabilities associated withstandard finite difference methods used for simulating such systems, we construct non-standard finitedifference (NSFD) schemes, which preserve the dynamic properties of the system, and may therefore beused for its simulation.

Keywords: Nonstandard finite difference schemes; Hantavirus epidemics; Finite difference methods;Equilibrium points

1. Introduction

The following basic model of mouse populations has been used in the study of Hantavirus

epidemics [1]:

dMs

dt bM 2 cMs 2MsM

K2 aMsMI 1

dMI

dt 2cMI 2MIM

K aMsMI 2

where Ms $ 0 and MI $ 0 are, respectively, the populations of susceptible and infected

mice, b is the birth rate, c is the death rate, a is the infection rate, and K is related to the

carrying capacity of the environment. Note that for system (1) and (2), the conservation law

describing the dynamics of the total population, M Ms MI, is the logistic equationdM

dt b2 cM 2M

2

K: 3

Therefore, the carrying capacity for the total population is M* (b 2 c)K.Since the closed-form general solutions of the non-linear system (1) and (2), are

not possible, any useful information from the system must be deduced from dynamical

analysis and numerical simulation. The purpose of this note is two-fold: (i) to describe

the dynamical properties of the system (1) and (2), and (ii) to propose two

Journal of Difference Equations and Applications

ISSN 1023-6198 print/ISSN 1563-5120 online q 2006 Taylor & Francis

http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals

DOI: 10.1080/10236190600779791

*Corresponding author. Email: chen@ncat.eduEmail: clemence@ncat.edu

Journal of Difference Equations and Applications,

Vol. 12, No. 9, September 2006, 887899

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f C

hica

go L

ibra

ry]

at 1

1:24

20

Nov

embe

r 20

14

non-standard finite difference (NSFD) [9] schemes which may be used for the simulation of

(1)(3).

It is reasonable to expect that, in order to give reliable simulation results, any finite

difference scheme used for equations (1) and (2) should preserve their dynamic properties.

Standard finite difference numerical schemes, such as the Euler and RungeKutta methods,

are known to yield unstable, or simply incorrect, results even for equation (3) [3,7]. In fact,

numerical simulations show that, even with small step sizes and for some positive initial data,

it takes only a few iterations for Euler and RungeKutta schemes to achieve negative values

and then blow up (see table 1 in section 4). However, a novel class of finite difference

schemes, commonly known as NSFD schemes [6,7], have been shown to remove such

method-dependent instabilities (see, for example, [5] and [7]).

In this note, the proposed NSFD schemes are compared to the standard Euler, RK-2, and

RK-4 methods on their performance in preserving the following properties of the system

(1)(3) for various time-step sizes h and initial conditions:

(P1), Positivity: The scheme does not admit negative solutions with non-negative initial data,

i.e. Ms(0) $ 0, MI(0) $ 0 implies that Ms(t) $ 0, MI(t) $ 0 for all t . 0.; (P2),

Convergence: The scheme produce data that converge to correct equilibria.; (P3), Non-

periodicity: The scheme does not possess solutions which are periodic.

The NSFD schemes are shown to remain faithful to the dynamics of equations (1) and (2) for

much larger h than the standard methods, with one in particular retaining system dynamics

for all h . 0.

In the next section, we describe the details of the global dynamics of the system (1), (2) and

(3), and give the local stability analysis of its equilibria. The biological significance of the

results presented is also discussed. In section 3, we construct two NSFD schemes, which may

be used to simulate equations (1) and (2). Finally, in section 4, the results of the numerical

simulation are given and discussed.

2. Analysis of equilibria

The dynamics of equation (3) with various parameter values are well-known and have the

following features:

. If b c, then equation (3) becomes dM=dt 2M 2=K, which has one stable equilibriumM 0.

. If b c, then equation (3) can be written as dM/dt (b 2 c)M[1 2 (M/K(b 2 c))]. Theequation then has one stable equilibrium M 0 if b , c; and the equation has twoequilibria if b . c: M 0, which is unstable, and M K(b 2 c), which is stable.

Table 1. Comparison of RK-4, RK-2, Euler and NSFD.

Method RK-4 RK-2 Euler NSFD

Result When n 6,(Ms, MI) ! (1, 21)

When n 4,(Ms, MI) ! (1, 21)

When n 7,(Ms, MI) ! (1, 21)

(Ms, MI) ! (10, 10)

K 40, a 0.1, b 1, c 0.5, h 0.1 M0s 200, M0I 230.

M. Chen and D. P. Clemence888

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Uni

vers

ity o

f C

hica

go L

ibra

ry]

at 1

1:24

20

Nov

embe

r 20

14

Using the equilibria M 0 and M K(b 2 c) of equation (3), we observe that the system(1) and (2) has the following non-negative equilibria:

(1) If b # c, then equations (1) and (2) has only a single equilibrium (0, 0);

(2) If b . c, and

if K(b 2 c) 2 (b/a) # 0, then equations (1) and (2) has equilibria (0, 0) and(K(b 2 c), 0);

if K(b 2 c) 2 (b/a) . 0, then equations (1) and (2) has equilibria (0, 0), (K(b 2 c),0) and ((b/a), K(b 2 c) 2 (b/a)).

2.1 Global analysis

To examine the global behavior of the system (1) and (2), we first examine its dynamical flow

on the boundary of the first quadrant.

On the positive MI-axis, Ms 0, MI . 0, so by equation (1), dMs/dt bMI . 0 and theflow is into the first quadrant. On the positive Ms-axis, MI 0, Ms . 0, so by equations (1)and (2), dMs=dt b2 cMs 2 M2s=K, and (dMI/dt) 0, so the flow stays on the Ms-axisand the dynamics is the same as that of the logistic equation (3). By continuity and

uniqueness, the flow is thus invariant in the first quadrant.

We then use the Liapunov function V(Ms, MI) Ms MI $ 0 in the first quadrant. Notethat the derivative of V through equations (1) and (2) is

dV

dt b2 cV 2 V

2

K:

If b # c, then (dV/dt) , 0 for all V . 0, from which we conclude that

Recommended