analysis of information security

8/10/2019 Analysis of Information Security

1/20

L O G O

A. BUDI SETIAWAN

AN ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SECURITYGOVERNANCE READINESS IN GOVERNMENTINSTITUTION

The Center of Research and Development of InformaticApplication.Agency of Human Resource Research and Development,Ministry of ICT Indonesia

Delivered at 4 th International Symposium on ChaosRevolution in Science, Technology and SocietyAu ust 28-29 2013 in Jakarta Indonesia


2/20


3/20


4/20

Recent Risk Report in Indonesia

Distributed Denial of Service attack on the system of Domain Name Service(DNS) ccTLD-ID indicates that the attack on the domain "go.id" is the most

(source: Zone-h, 2012)

(source: Id-SIRTII, 2012)

Number of attacks to domain id website onOctober 2012

THREAT


5/20

Observe the readiness of Information Security Governanceimplementation in government agencies

Analysis was performed by using index of e-Government Rank(PeGI) and Information Security Index (Index KAMI

The Study of IT Security Readiness in Government

PeGI

IndexKAMI

Trianggulation:Expert

judgemnet(FGD)


6/20

Indonesias Statistics

Internet users: 55,000,000 Internet users as of June.30, 2012, and22.1% penetration.(source : http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm#id)Internet subs: 2,3 millions


7/20

Cyber Security Legal Framework in Indonesia


8/20

National Policy and Law on Internet Security

Indonesias Act

Indonesias Telecommunication Act

(UU Telekomunikasi)

Information & Electronic Transaction Act (UU ITE)

No. 29/PER/M.KOMINFO/10 /2010 aboutSecuring Telecommunication NetworkUtilization based on Internet Protocol

Number: 133/KEP/M/KOMINFO/04/2010

Number: 01/SE/M.KOMINFO/02/2011

Regulation of Minister of CIT

Decree of Minister of CIT

Circular of Minister of CIT


9/20

Information Security Index


10/20

The Index of Indonesian e-Government Rank

No. Dimensions

1 Policy

2 Institutional

3 Infrastructure

4 Application

5 Planning

5 Dimensions of Indonesian e-Government Rank :

Provides a reference for the development and utilization of ICT in public sector Provide impetus for the development of ICT in the government through the

evaluation of a large, balanced, and objective

Provides map of the environment conditions of the use of ICT in the nationalgovernment

Goals :


11/20

Indonesian e-Government Rank 2012 :

Ministries


12/20

NO Ministries

DIMENSION SCORE

CATEGORYPOLICY INSTITUTIONAL

INFRASTRUCT

UREAPPLICATION PLANNING AVERAGE

1 Kementerian Keuangan 3.50 3.53 3.52 3.37 3.63 3.51 Good

2 Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum 3.10 3.52 3.11 3.34 3.52 3.32 Good

3 Kementerian Perindustrian 3.13 3.50 3.48 3.40 3.00 3.30 Good

4 Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 3.17 3.27 3.40 3.22 3.13 3.24 Good

5 Kementerian Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi 3.10 2.96 2.83 2.94 3.16 3.00 Good

6 Kementerian Perhubungan 2.79 2.70 2.90 2.92 2.77 2.82 Good

7 Kementerian Perdagangan 2.73 2.73 3.19 2.92 2.40 2.79 Good

8 Kementerian Pertahanan 2.84 3.10 2.68 2.50 2.75 2.77 Good

9 Kementerian Pemuda dan Olah Raga 2.44 2.73 2.95 2.73 2.83 2.74 Good

10 Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional 2.10 2.43 3.14 2.90 2.73 2.66 Good

11 Kementerian Kesehatan 2.23 2.88 2.74 2.70 2.52 2.61 Good

12 Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral 1.98 2.63 2.98 2.67 2.73 2.60 Good

13 Kementerian Kehutanan 2.54 2.80 2.93 2.62 1.67 2.51 Poor

14 Kementerian Pertanian 2.63 3.03 2.69 2.37 1.67 2.48 Poor

15 Kementerian Luar Negeri 2.15 2.44 2.77 2.40 2.40 2.43 Poor

16 Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2.17 2.33 2.26 2.63 2.70 2.42 Poor

17 Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat 2.38 2.70 2.36 2.27 2.27 2.39 Poor

18 Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi 2.10 2.87 2.55 2.60 1.70 2.36 Poor

19 Kementerian Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah 2.25 2.28 2.37 2.58 2.20 2.34 Poor

20 Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara 1.55 2.28 2.40 2.64 2.40 2.25 Poor

21 Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian 2.40 2.60 2.10 2.45 1.57 2.22 Poor

22 Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif 2.19 2.57 2.24 2.03 1.67 2.14 Poor

23 Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan 2.02 2.67 2.07 2.38 1.40 2.11 Poor

24Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan PerlindunganAnak

2.03 2.44 1.80 2.08 1.44 1.96 Poor

25Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum, danKeamanan

1.50 2.00 1.94 2.10 2.12 1.93 Poor

26 Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup 1.44 1.90 2.24 2.18 1.83 1.92 Poor

27 Kementerian Agama 1.43 2.04 2.46 1.88 1.48 1.86 Poor

28 Kementerian Perumahan Rakyat 1.38 1.83 1.90 2.23 1.30 1.73 Poor

29 Kementerian Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal 1.21 1.63 1.57 1.80 1.40 1.52 Very PoorAVERAGE 2.29 2.63 2.61 2.58 2.29 2.48 Poor


13/20

Indonesian e-Government Rank 2012 :

Local Government (Provinces)


14/20

NO Provinces

DIMENSION SCORE

CATEGORYPOLICY INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE APPLICATION PLANNING AVERAGE

1 Jawa Barat 3.46 3.53 3.33 3.10 3.47 3.38 Good2 Jawa Timur 3.17 3.47 3.10 2.73 2.67 3.03 Good3 DKI Jakarta 2.88 2.73 2.90 2.77 2.80 2.82 Good4 Yogyakarta 2.79 2.67 2.90 2.73 2.80 2.78 Good

5 Aceh 2.42 2.87 3.05 2.77 2.47 2.71 Good6 Bangka Belitung 2.67 3.07 2.38 2.27 2.73 2.62 Good7 Sumatera Selatan 2.71 2.60 2.67 2.40 2.67 2.61 Good8 Gorontalo 2.42 2.47 2.48 2.60 2.87 2.57 Poor9 Jambi 1.83 2.73 2.24 2.53 2.47 2.36 Poor

10 Jawa Tengah 2.08 2.67 2.67 2.40 1.80 2.32 Poor11 Kalimantan Timur 2.00 2.40 2.43 2.23 2.20 2.25 Poor12 Kalimantan Tengah 2.21 2.40 2.00 2.03 2.40 2.21 Poor13 Nusa Tenggara Barat 2.29 2.13 1.71 2.43 1.67 2.05 Poor14 Sumatera Barat 2.38 2.13 2.05 1.77 1.60 1.98 Poor15 Kalimantan Barat 1.92 2.20 1.95 2.00 1.80 1.97 Poor16 Papua 1.67 1.90 1.93 1.98 2.27 1.95 Poor17 Sulawesi Utara 2.00 2.20 1.67 2.37 1.20 1.89 Poor18 Kepulauan Riau 1.38 2.47 1.48 1.80 2.13 1.85 Poor19 Sumatera Utara 1.21 2.20 1.86 1.77 1.47 1.70 Poor20 Sulawesi Barat 1.50 1.70 1.90 1.70 1.47 1.65 Poor21 Lampung 1.21 2.07 1.43 1.90 1.47 1.61 Poor

22 Bengkulu 1.50 1.73 1.19 1.63 1.33 1.48Very Poor

Poor

23 Sulawesi Tengah 1.33 1.80 1.24 1.63 1.00 1.40 Very PoorPoor

24 Kalimantan Selatan 1.00 1.47 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.23Very Poor

PoorAVERAGE 2.08 2.40 2.15 2.22 2.07 2.18 Poor


15/20

Analysis of Indonesian e-Government Rank

Ministries

31.03%

48.28%

20.69%

Dimension: Policy

Good Poor Very Poor

58.62%41.38%

0%

Dimension: Institutional

Good Poor Very Poor

51.72%44.83%

3.45%

Dimension:Infrastructure

Good Poor Very Poor

51.72%68.28%

0%

Dimension: Application

Good Poor Very Poor

3.45%

34.48%

41.38%

20.69%

Dimension: Planning

Very Good Good

Poor Very Poor


16/20

Analysis of Indonesian e-Government Rank

Local Government (Provinces)

25.00%

45.83%

29.17%

Dimension: Policy

Good Poor Very Poor

37.50%

58.33%

4%

Dimension: Institutional

Good Poor Very Poor

29.17%

50.00%

20.83%

Dimension: Infrastructure

Good Poor Very Poor

20.83%

79.17%

0%

Dimension: Application

Good Poor Very Poor

0.00% 29.17%

41.67%

29.17%

Dimension: Planning

Very Good Good Poor Very Poor


17/20

Source: Directorate ofInformation Security

Information Security Index 2012


18/20

1. Coordination between government agencies is still weakin terms of cyber security

2. The levels of internet safety and cyber securityawareness of government agencies and public are stilllow

3. Implementation of ICT security in Indonesia is stillrunning on silo system

4. ICT governance and information security management

systems in government agencies do not operateeffectively

Cyber Security Readiness in Government


19/20

1. Need strong commitment form all level management ingovernment institution related to implement IT Securitygovernance

2. Information security should become the spirit for all ICTregulation and policy3. Need particular policy from the highest level government

management which is mandate for all governmentinstitution to implement IT Security governance

Recommendation for Cyber Security Readinessin Government


20/20

THANK YOU

A. BUDI SETIAWANICT Researcher at Center of R&D of Informatic ApplicationHuman Resource R&D Agency, Ministry of ICT Indonesia

[email protected] ahmed setiawan007@yahoo com
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

analysis of information security

Documents