analysis of third-semester students’ grammatical

16
ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL ERROR IN DAILY ROUTINE SPEAKING PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT OF UMM THESIS By: Anang Dwi Yulianto 201610100311139 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG 2021

Upload: others

Post on 26-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

ERROR IN DAILY ROUTINE SPEAKING PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH

LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT OF UMM

THESIS

By:

Anang Dwi Yulianto

201610100311139

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2021

Page 2: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’

GRAMMATICAL ERROR IN DAILY ROUTINE SPEAKING

PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT OF

UMM

THESIS

This thesis is submitted to meet one of the requirements to achieve

Sarjana Degree in English Language Education

By:

Anang Dwi Yulianto

201610100311136

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

2021

Page 3: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

iii

This thesis was written by Anang Dwi Yulianto and was approved on 2 June 2021

By:

Advisor II, Advisor I,

Nina Inayati, S.Pd., M.Ed Erly Wahyuni, Dra. Hj., M. Si

Page 4: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

iv

Bayu Hendro Wicaksono, M.Ed.,

Ph.D

UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS Kampus III: Jl. Raya Tlogomas No. 246 Malang Telp (0341) 464318 - 319 Ext. 121 Malang

65144 E-mail: [email protected] / Website: www.english.umm.ac.id

SURAT KETERANGAN

E.5.a/258/B.Ing-FKIP/UMM/VII/2021

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:

Nama : Budi Hendro Wicaksono, M.Ed., Ph.D

Jabatan : Ketua Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Menerangkan bahwa mahasiswa:

Nama : Anang Dwi Yulianto

NIM : 201610100311139

Judul Skripsi : Analysis of Third-Semester Students’ Grammatical Error in Daily Routine Speaking

Performance in English Language Department of UMM

adalah benar-benar mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FKIP-UMM yang telah

melaksanakan proses ujian skripsi pada Periode III 2021. Mahasiswa tersebut telah dinyatakan lulus

ujian skripsi dengan nilai B+ dan telah melakukan revisi yang telah disetujui oleh para penguji.

Demikian surat keterangan ini dibuat, agar digunakan sebagaimana semestinya.

Malang, 10 Juli 2021

Ketua Prodi,

Visi: Menjadi Prodi yang terkemuka di tingkat internasional dalam penyelenggaraan

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris berdasarkan nilai-nilai keprofesionalan dan ke-Islaman

Page 5: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

v

MOTTO AND DEDICATIONS

MOTTO

“Meaningless fate, sooner or later will collapse when facing reality”. – freya

(Mobile legend game)

“If you hear a voice within you saying, ‘you are not a painter’, then by all means

paint… and that voice will be silenced”. – Vincent van gogh

DEDICATIONS

I dedicate this thesis to:

Me, my family, my friends, and my dearest advisor Mrs. Erly and Mrs. Nina

Page 6: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

vi

Page 7: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

vii

ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

ERROR IN DAILY ROUTINE SPEAKING PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH

LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT OF UMM

ABSTRACT

Grammar error is an error made by learners in grammar. In learning language, mastery of

grammar is needed because it gives knowledge for learner to convey information clearly and to

use correct sentence patterns. Mastering grammar knowledge will help speaking English, because

learners will understand how to arrange words in the sentence, what tense will be used, and how

to use appropriate utterance. In this context, the researcher attempted to analyze what grammatical

errors made by third-semester student of the English Language Department in a teaching and

learning English activity. The aim of this research was to find grammatical errors made by third-

semester student of the English Language Department in a teaching and learning English activity.

The researcher used descriptive qualitative approach and surface strategy taxonomy by

Dulay (1982) to categorize the grammatical error. The participant of this study were 10 students

on third-semester student that asked to record their speaking performance of daily routine for 1-2

minutes. The record data of third-semester students showed that the researcher obtained 125

grammatical errors from the dialogue of the students’ speaking performance; 28 omission, 40

addition, 50 misformation, and 7 misordering. The researcher hopes this study can be a good

material to ease the teacher sets the better way of teaching English speaking in order to improve

students’ ability.

Keywords: Speaking, Error, Daily Routine

Advisor I The Researcher

Erly Wahyuni, Dra. Hj., M. Si Anang Dwi Yulianto

Page 8: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

viii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

First and foremost, bless and praises to the almighty god Allah SWT for

bringing me to this stage and giving me favor to complete this research.

I would like honor and deliver my big gratitude to Erly Wahyuni, Dra. Hj., M.

Si and Mrs. Nina Inayati, S.Pd., M.Ed for always support and help me to complete my

thesis. I am pleasured to be under their guidance.

Last but not least, the biggest thanks to my beloved family for their love, their

sacrifices, and limitless prayers for supporting and educating me. I would to say big

thanks to all my friends for sacrifices their time in completing this thesis.

Page 9: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MOTTO AND DEDICATIONS v

ABSTRACT vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS ix

LIST OF TABLES xi

LIST OF APPENDICES xii

CHAPTER I 1

Background of Study 1

Research Question 3

Purpose of the study 3

Significance of the study 3

Scope and limitation 3

Definition of key terms 4

Speaking 4

Error 4

Grammatical Error 4

Daily Routine 5

CHAPTER II 6

Error 6

Sources of error 7

Error analysis 8

Types of Error 9

Omission 9

Addition 10

Misformation (error of selection) 11

Misordering 12

2.5 Grammar Error 13

2.6 Speaking Skill 13

2.7 Daily routine 14

CHAPTER III 15

3.1 Research Design 15

3.2 Research Subject 16

3.3 Data Collection 16

Page 10: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

x

3.4 Data Analysis 17

CHAPTER IV 18

4.1 FINDINGS 18

Tabulation of Grammatical Error Frequency 18

Sample 1 20

Sample 2 20

Sample 3 22

4.2 DISCUSSIONS 22

CHAPTER V 24

5.1 CONCLUSION 24

5.2 SUGGESTIONS 24

REFERENCES

APPENDICES

Page 11: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

xi

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Tabulation of Grammatical Error Frequency 18

Table 2.1 Grammatical Error Features Error Made by Sample 1 20

Table 2.2 Grammatical Error Features Error Made by Sample 2 20

Table 2.3 Grammatical Error Features Error Made by Sample 3 22

Page 12: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

xii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1 : Data Collection 26

Appendix 2 : Transform Data into Written Dialogue 26

Sample 1 26

Sample 2 27

Sample 3 29

Sample 4 31

Sample 5 33

Sample 6 35

Sample 7 36

Sample 8 38

Sample 9 39

Sample 10 42

Page 13: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

REFERENCES

Adib, Qowimul. 2012. “Grammatical Error Analysis of Speaking of English Department

Students.” 1–76.

Aliaga, M. and Gunderson, B. (2003). Interactive Statistics (Second Edition). Upper Saddle River,

NJ: Prentice Hall.

Adib, Qowimul. 2012. “Grammatical Error Analysis of Speaking of English Department

Students.” 1–76.

Al-Mekhlafi, Abdu Mohammed, and Ramani Perur Nagaratnam. 2011. “Difficulties in Teaching

and Learning Grammar in an Efl Context.” International Journal of Instruction 4(2):69–92.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. “Principles of Language Learning and Teaching.”

Ciesielkiewicz, Monika, and Elena Marquez. 2015. “Error Analysis and Its Relevance to

Teaching ESL Composition.” International Journal of Linguistics 7(5):119. doi:

10.5296/ijl.v7i5.8076.

Collins Dictionary. (2021). Retrieved from

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/daily-routine

Danurwindo, Fegupa. 2014. “Grammatical Error Analysis in Speaking of the Second English

Students of IAIN Tulungagung Academic Year 2013-2014.”

Dulay, Heidi, Marina Burt, and Stephen Krashen. 1982. “Language Two. Newyork: Oxford

University Press.”

Dulay, Heidi, Marina Burt, and Krashen Stephen. 1982. “Language Two.” 313.

Endang, Fauziati. 2009. “The Effects of Error Treatment on Interlanguage of Indonesian

Learners Learning English as a Foreign Language.” 21(1):55–66.

Hairus, Salikin, and Zulfiqar Bin Tahir Saidna. 2017. “The Social Media-Based Approach in

Teaching Writing at Jember University, Indonesia.” International Journal of English

Linguistics 7(3):46. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v7n3p46.

Hanieh, Sepahvand. 2014. “The Effect of Oral Reproduction of Short Stories on Speaking Skill

Page 14: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

in Iranian High School Students (Case Study: Khorram Abad, Iran).” International

Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 3(7):1847–51.

Hojati, Alireza. 2013. “An Investigation of Errors in the Oral Performance of Advanced-Level

Iranian EFL Students.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4(4):171–79. doi:

10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n4p171.

Hsu, Hsiu-ling. 2013. “Interaction between Markedness and Transfer in English Coda Nasals:

Taiwanese Learning English as a Foreign Language.” Studies in Media and Communication

1(1):64–90. doi: 10.11114/smc.v1i1.95.

Jakobs, Eva Maria, and Daniel Perrin. 2008. Training of Writing and Reading. Vol. 1.

Kamil, Dairabi. 2017. “TEFL Students’ Language Learning Strategies: The Case of One State

Islamic Institute in Indonesia.” Ta’dib : Journal of Islamic Education 22(2):70–76. doi:

10.19109/tjie.v22i2.1641.

Kuning, Dewi Sri. 2019. “Technology in Teaching Speaking Skill.” Journal of English

Education, Literature and Linguistics 2(1):50–59. doi: 10.31540/jeell.v2i1.243.

Kusmaryati, Sri Endang. 2008. “Improving English Speaking Ability through Classroom

Discussion for Students of MA NU Banat Kudus in the Academic Year 2008 / 2009.”

Journal Sosbud 1–16.

Mukminantus, Zuhriyah. 2017. “Storytelling to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill.” 10(1):119.

Mukminin, Amirul, Masbirorotni Masbirorotni, Noprival Noprival, Sutarno Sutarno, Nelly Arif,

and Maimunah Maimunah. 2015. “EFL Speaking Anxiety among Senior High School

Students and Policy Recommendations.” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)

9(3):217. doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.1828.

Mustikareni, Dyah. 2013. Error Analysis on English Diphthongs Pronounced by the Students of

SMA Negeri 1 Comal and SMA Negeri 1 Banjarnegara in English Debate on " Relax " Tv

Program of TVRI.

Nurhayati. 2011. “Teaching Story Telling Using Mind Mapping in Speaking Class.” Journal

Unindra 3(3):226–37.

Page 15: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

Peter, Robinson, and Nick C. Ellis. 2008. “Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second

Language Acquisition.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de

Linguistique 55(3):425–27. doi: 10.1017/s000841310000164x.

Puspitasari, Dewi. 2013. “Grammatical Errors Made by the Second Semester Students in Writing

II Subject in the English Education Department of Yogyakarta State University in the

Accademic Year of 2012/ 2013.” 1–165.

Rula, Tahsin Tarawneh, and Mousa Almomani Islam. 2013. “The Spoken Errors and Mistakes

Committed by Senior English Students at Princess Alia University College.” Theory and

Practice in Language Studies 3(3):497–502. doi: 10.4304/tpls.3.3.497-502.

Rustipa, Katharina. 2011. “Contrastive Analysis , Error Analysis, Interlanguage and the

Implication to Language Teaching.” Pengembangan Humaniora 11(1):16–22.

Wicaksono, Agung. 2014. “Sources of Grammatical Error : A Case Study on Intralingual ,

Interlingual , Context of Learning and Communication Strategies Factors.” 01:188–91.

Wu, Hsiao-ping, and Esther V. Garza. 2014. “Types and Attributes of English Writing Errors in

the EFL Context—A Study of Error Analysis.” Journal of Language Teaching and

Research 5(6):1256–62. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.6.1256-1262.

Page 16: ANALYSIS OF THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL

LEMBAR HASIL CEK PLAGIASI

Koordinator Plagiasi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FKIP UMM menyatakan bahwa:

*Nama : Anang Dwi Yuli

*NIM : 201610100311139

Telah melakukan uji kesamaan Karya Ilmiah dalam bentuk Tugas Akhir (Skripsi) dengan hasil

sebagai berikut:

Bagian Skripsi (CHAPTER) Prosentase Hasil Kesamaan

CHAPTER I Introduction 9%

CHAPTER II Review of Related Literature 24%

CHAPTER III Research Method 21%

CHAPTER IV Findings and Discussion 6%

CHAPTER V Conclusion and Suggestions 4%

Berdasarkan prosentase hasil uji kesamaan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil deteksi plagiasi telah

memenuhi syarat dan ketentuan yang telah diatur pada Peraturan Rektor No. 2 Tahun 2017.

Malang, 31 Mei 2021

Koordinator Plagiasi Prodi,

Prihadi Dwi Nurcahyanto, M.Pd

Catatan *Wajib diisi dengan hasil ketikan bukan tulisan tangan *Mohon menunjukkan hasil prosentase sebelum meminta tanda tangan