andrea garavaglia and christian pietsch qualcomm

30
PAGE 1 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012 OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

Upload: others

Post on 25-Feb-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 1 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch – Qualcomm

Page 2: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 2 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Jorge Salinger (Comcast)

Rick Li (Cortina)

Lup Ng (Cortina)

Supported by

Page 3: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 3 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM: motivation and background

OFDM key strengths

How does OFDM work

OFDM for EPoC PHY - numerology

Cyclic Prefix selection

Carrier spacing and symbol duration

Robustness against impairments

OFDMA

OFDMA versus TDMA

Flavors of OFDMA: Downstream and Upstream

Summary

Outline

Page 4: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 4 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM is widely deployed by latest communication systems, e.g.:

DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-C2

LTE

Wireless LAN (IEEE 802.11): a, g, n, ac

Key advantages:

Efficient ways to cope with channel impairments, like for example:

– Time dispersive channels

– Narrowband interference

– Frequency selective channel

– Resilience to burst noise

No inter OFDM symbol interference due to cyclic prefix

Reasonable computational complexity

Less sensitive to time synchronization than a single carrier scheme

Coexistence with legacy services while maintaining high spectral efficiency

– Fine frequency granularity due to subcarriers

– Easily adapted to available bandwidth

OFDM – Motivation

Page 5: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 5 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM is a special scheme for multi-carrier transmission for which the available spectrum is divided into narrowband orthogonal sub-channels each with flat spectral characteristics and each used for transmission of a subcarrier

A high data rate stream is converted into M parallel low data rate streams, each modulating one subcarrier in the frequency domain

A high spectral efficiency is achieved while allowing for a low-complex implementation since subcarrier separation is simple due their orthogonality

OFDM – Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing

frequency

H(f)

OFDM sub-carriers

OFDM sub-channels

Page 6: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 6 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM relies on frequency domain processing:

QAM modulated symbols are placed on each subcarrier in the frequency domain

QAM symbols are received on each subcarrier in the frequency domain

A frequency selective channel is converted into frequency flat sub-channels:

Different sub-channels may observe different channel conditions

Modulation order may be adjusted according to SNR on sub-channels

The OFDM symbol duration is much longer than the channel delay spread:

A requirement for frequency flat sub-channels

Inter OFDM symbol interference is eliminated at marginal costs

The subcarriers are orthogonal:

No interference between subcarriers, i.e. the QAM symbols on the subcarriers may be detected independently

OFDM – How It Works

frequencyOFDM sub-carriers

Page 7: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 7 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM – Block Diagram and Block Processing

Block processing at the transmitter:

QAM symbols for all subcarriers are gathered prior to IFFT

IFFT is carried out jointly for all QAM symbols dedicated to an OFDM symbol

Block processing at the receiver:

An entire OFDM symbol has to be received before processing can start

All QAM symbols become available at the same time after the FFT

MAC layer does not need to be aware of OFDM PHY layer block processing

OFDM Receiver OFDM Transmitter

CP

IFFT

addCP

par

alle

l to

ser

ial

QA

M s

ymb

ols

channel

seri

al t

o p

aral

lel

FFT

QA

M s

ymb

ols

seri

al t

o p

aral

lel

par

alle

l to

ser

ial

block processing block processing

Page 8: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 8 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM for EPoC PHY – Possible Numerology

PHY Parameter Value Comments

Bandwidth 120 MHz • Target Bandwidth

Subcarrier Spacing

(𝑓𝛥)

7.5 kHz • Enable low-cost implementation while

incurring low CP overhead

• OFDM symbol duration = 1/subcarrier spacing

Cyclic Prefix

Duration (𝑇𝐶𝑃)

~1 µs or ~4 µs • Sufficient to cover cable plant micro-

reflections (reflections > -40dB)

• Possible to support multiple CP durations for

different deployments

QAM Modulation

Orders Supported

16-QAM

64-QAM

256-QAM

1024-QAM

4096-QAM

• Support a range of modulation orders from

16-QAM up to 4096 QAM

• Selection of specific QAM-order depends on

SNR achievable in the plant

• Different QAM-order may be used on

downstream and upstream

• Different QAM-order could be possible to/from

different CNUs

Page 9: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 9 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

The CP plays an integral role in the construction of the OFDM signal:

It acts as a guard period and thus eliminates inter OFDM symbol interference

It guarantees orthogonality between subcarriers of the OFDM symbol for time dispersive channels

The length of the CP must be at least as long as the channel delay spread

It is constructed by adding a copy of the last time domain samples of the OFDM symbol to the beginning of the OFDM symbol, see diagram below

An overhead incurs due to the CP: TCP

TCP+TS

Longer OFDM symbols cause less overhead due to the CP

OFDM – Cyclic Prefix (CP)

timeTCP TS TCP TS TCP TS

cyclic prefix generation

Page 10: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 10 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Relationship: 𝑓∆ = 1/𝑇𝑠 - OFDM symbol duration: 𝑇𝑠 - Subcarrier spacing: 𝑓∆ (or sub-channel width)

Example: Two configurations: - A: 𝑇𝑠 = 133.33 𝜇𝑠 - B: 𝑇𝑠 = 33.33 𝜇𝑠 - CP duration: 𝑇𝐶𝑃 = 4.16 𝜇𝑠

Configuration B requires 4 OFDM symbols to transmit the same amount of data as configuration A

Example CP overhead:

- A: 4.16𝜇𝑠

137.5𝜇𝑠= 3%

- B: 4.16𝜇𝑠

33.33𝜇𝑠= 12.5%

- B has (150−137.5)𝜇𝑠

137.5𝜇𝑠= 9% more

CP overhead than A

OFDM Symbol Duration – Subcarrier Spacing (I)

Subcarrier 1

Subcarrier 2

Subcarrier 15999

Subcarrier 16000

Full

ban

dw

idth

: 12

0 M

Hz

Sub

carr

ier

spac

ing:

7.5

kH

z

133.33 μs

1

2

4000

1

2

4000

1

2

4000

1

2

4000

137.5 μs 150 μs

33.33 μs

cycl

ic p

refi

x

cycl

ic p

refi

x

cycl

ic p

refi

x

cycl

ic p

refi

x

cycl

ic p

refi

x

OFD

M s

ymb

ol

OFD

M s

ymb

ol

OFD

M s

ymb

ol

OFD

M s

ymb

ol

OFD

M s

ymb

ol

Sub

carr

ier

spac

ing:

30

kH

z

A B

Page 11: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 11 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

The CP duration must be larger than the maximum channel delay spread (and any additional delay spread added due to filtering and inaccurate synchronization), but only a little larger than this to minimize overhead

Hence, given a certain cable plant that is known to cause a certain maximal delay spread, the optimal CP length is predefined.

The parameter of choice is the OFDM symbol duration, which then influences CP overhead. To minimize overhead it is essential that

Overhead due to Cyclic Prefix

𝑇𝐶𝑃 ≪ 𝑇𝑆

Overhead due to cyclic prefix: TCP

TCP+TS

Page 12: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 12 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM Symbol Duration – Pros/Cons

Feature Pros Cons

Long OFDM

symbols

- More robust against burst

noise (no additional

interleaving needed)

- Less CP overhead

- May impact the end-to-end

delay for cases where no

interleaver would be required

Small

subcarrier

spacing

- Finer granularity for

counteracting narrowband

interference (e.g. notching of

single subcarriers)

- Larger FFT size needed for a

given spectrum

- Higher frequency accuracy

required

Short OFDM

symbols

- Could achieve a smaller end-

to-end delay for cases where

no interleaver is required

- Less robust against burst

noise, requires interleaver

- High CP overhead, impacting

overall spectral efficiency

Large

subcarrier

spacing

- Reduced FFT size sufficient

- Reduced frequency accuracy

- Difficult or inefficient

counteracting of narrow-band

interference

Page 13: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 13 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Narrowband Interference:

Affects a only few subcarriers

Modulation order can be reduced on these subcarriers or affected subcarriers can be easily blanked

A smaller subcarrier spacing provides higher granularity

Burst noise:

Typical burst noise duration: 10 μs

Burst noise affects all subcarriers

Burst noise increases noise level on the subcarriers

The longer the OFDM symbol duration the lower the increase of noise level

Two alternatives for coping with burst noise: - long OFDM symbols - interleaving (see next slide)

Narrowband Interference and Burst Noise

Subcarrier 1

Subcarrier 2

Subcarrier 15999

Subcarrier 16000

Full

ban

dw

idth

: 12

0 M

Hz

7.5

kH

z

133.33 μs

1

2

4000

33.33 μs

30

kH

z

time

Burst noise events:

freq

uen

cyN

arro

wb

and

inte

rfer

ence

:

Noise level without burst noise

no

ise

leve

l o

n

sub

carr

iers

Page 14: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 14 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Each shaded area corresponds to a separate interleaving block or FEC block

For a certain level of resilience against burst noise, the data has to be spread across a certain period of time (e.g. 133 μs)

Interleaving across multiple OFDM symbols is required for short OFDM symbols (B)

With long OFDM symbols no inter OFDM symbol interleaving is needed (A)

The delay due to processing is similar for both alternatives

OFDM Symbols Duration and Interleaving

Subcarrier 1

Subcarrier 2

Subcarrier 15999

Subcarrier 16000

Full

ban

dw

idth

: 12

0 M

Hz

7.5

kH

z

133.33 μs

1

2

4000

1

2

4000

1

2

4000

1

2

4000

137.5 μs 150 μs

33.33 μs

30

kH

z

A B

Page 15: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 15 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM for EPoC PHY – Robustness

Distortion Robustness

Linear Distortion

(Micro-reflections)

• OFDM cyclic prefix (CP) addresses all linear distortions up to the

length of the CP – past the CP micro-reflection power shall be low

Time-variant

Channels

• To provide robustness against time-variant channels, channel

coding is employed together with OFDM

• A Forward Error Correction (FEC) scheme is included for that

• Different coding rate could be used to better adjust to frequency

channel conditions while maximizing the system capacity

Impulse Noise • Burst noise lowers the SNR of affected OFDM symbol(s), but if the

noise burst is significantly shorter than the OFDM symbol period,

the degradation is small and no further interleaver is needed

• Additionally FEC coding provides degradation margin

Narrowband

Interference

• Narrowband interference may cause low SNR on some subcarriers:

• This can be addressed by adaptive modulation which does not

use the same QAM-order on each subcarrier

• Alternatively, receiver may ignore information on certain low

SNR subcarriers – no information sent on those sub-carriers

Page 16: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 16 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Pilot Symbols – Example

At the receiver side, it is necessary for demodulation to estimate the channel

For that, symbols known in advance to the receiver (called pilots) should be included into the data stream

Certain subcarriers are used by pilots and reduce the spectral efficiency

The number of required pilots depends on the frequency and time variability of the channel impulse response

Pilots should be staggered in time and frequency

Pilot structure is a design criterion

Subcarrier idx38

37

36

35

34

33

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

32

31

-3

-4

-5

-6

-7

-8

-9

-10

-11

-12

-13

-14

-15

-16

-17

-18

-19

-20

-21

-22

-1

-2

0 1

0

2 3

1

4 5

2

6 7

3

8 9

4

10 11

5

12 13

6

14 15

7

16 17

8

18 19

9

20 21

10

22 23

11

24 25

12

26 27

13

28 29

14

30 31

15

0 1

0

2 3

1

4

2

Symbol idx

Subframe idx

Frame idx Frame 0 Frame 1

DC subcarrier

Time

Frequency

Page 17: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 17 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM for EPoC PHY – DVB-C2 – LTE

EPoC

example

DVB-C2

(Europe) LTE

Bandwidth span (digital bandwidth) 120 MHz 8 MHz 20 MHz

Symbol duration 133.33 μs 448.03μs 66.67μs

Subcarrier spacing 7.50 kHz 2.232kHz 15kHz

CP duration (typically used) 4.17 μs 7.00μs 4.76μs

CP overhead 3.03% 1.54% 6.66%

FFT size 16384 4096 2048

Highest modulation order 4096 QAM 4096 QAM 64 QAM

Highest code rate 0.9 0.9 0.9

Maximum payload per OFDM symbol 24576 bytes 67205 bytes 9000 bytes

Page 18: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 18 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Adopt OFDM as the basis for the EPoC PHY

Moved by:

Seconded by:

Technical motion (>=75%)

Yes / No / Abstain

Baseline Proposal #1

Page 19: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 19 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Assumptions:

- 120 MHz bandwidth

- up to 4096 QAM

- include pilot/guard tones

Typical amount of user

data per OFDM symbol

~3000-25000 bytes

But the smallest grant

size should be in the

range of 64 bytes to

minimize overhead

A better resource

granularity is needed

How much user data does one OFDM symbol carry?

If the users always get an entire OFDM

symbol, only a very small amount if data

per symbol would limit overhead (~70

bytes → TS = 0.5 μs, which is infeasible)

OFDMA is the answer

Page 20: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 20 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDMA is an access technique for OFDM to effectively achieve multi-

user communication systems for which subcarriers are distributed to

different users at a given point of time

While with TDMA all the subcarriers are assigned to the same user at a

given time, with OFDMA groups of subcarriers are allocated to different

users in the same symbol – see below

– Typically a contiguous group of sub-carrier is allocated to one user

– The same principle can apply for both downstream and upstream

OFDMA – Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access

frequency

user 1 user 2 user 3 user 4

Available Spectrum .

Page 21: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 21 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDM with TDMA

A user gets the entire OFDM symbol

If the user has less data to transmit the remaining resources in the OFDM symbol are wasted – large overhead

OFDM with OFDMA

Multiple users share a single OFDM symbol

Each user can get an amount of resources tailored to the real need, thus minimizing overheads

OFDMA vs. TDMA – Achieving Better Granularity

freq

uen

cy

time

freq

uen

cy

time

TDMA

OFDMA

OFDM symbol duration

OFDM symbol duration

Note: Each color represents a different user

Page 22: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 22 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDMA and MCS – Further Granularity Refinement

Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) describes the combination of modulation order (16-QAM, 64-QAM, etc.) and coding rate which is use to encore and map information bits into OFDM subcarriers in OFDMA

The modulation order determines how many bits can be carried by an OFDM tone – the bits include both information bits and parity bits

– Example: 4096 QAM translates in 12 bits/symbol or 12 bits/sub-carrier

The coding rate determines how many parity bits are added to a given set of information bits and it is typically expressed as ratio between information bits and overall number of bits after encoding

– Example: coding rate 9/10 means 9 information bits encoded in 10 bits

The selection of the appropriate MCS is related to the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) which is perceived over a certain link and frequency spectrum

The higher the SNR, the higher can be the modulation order and the coding rate, as less protection is needed to carry the same information

In the next slide an example of mapping between SNR and MCS is given

Page 23: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 23 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

BER Curves for MCS Selection – Example

Page 24: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 24 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Multiple users multiplexed in the same OFDM symbol, whereby all CNUs can decode the entire information

Same Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS) used for all users

Simpler but less efficient in terms of system performance

Multiple users multiplexed in the same OFDM symbol, whereby it is only guaranteed that each CNU can decode data dedicated to it

User dependent Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS)

Slightly more complex but better system performance

Each FEC block can carry data for either a single CNU or for

multiple CNUs that support the same MCS

OFDMA in Downstream – Simultaneous Reception

Page 25: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 25 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDMA in Upstream - Simultaneous Transmissions

OFDMA supports multiple CNUs transmitting at the same time on different subsets of subcarriers, in a flexible manner

This will keep latency small and under control

The CLT receives an OFDM symbol that is constructed in a distributed fashion by different CNUs

Each CNU is allocated a portion of the spectrum with no overlap

RTT mechanisms as in EPON ensure time synchronization at CLT

The maximum number of simultaneously transmitting CNUs depends on the number of LDPC code blocks within a given OFDM symbol

Since the capacity of each OFDM symbol is large many CNUs will be able to transmit simultaneously

In case a single CNU has sufficient data to effectively fill an entire OFDM symbol, it is possible for a single CNU to transmit at a time

Page 26: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 26 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

OFDMA – Upstream Example

CLT

CNU

CNU

CNU

freq

time

freq

time freq

time

freq

time

Non-overlapping allocation and RTT compensation for

correct symbol at CLT receiver

Page 27: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 27 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

In the upstream each OFDM symbol may contain data from

multiple CNUs

The precise design solution and related details are for further study

In the downstream each OFDM symbol may contain data to

multiple CNUs

The precise design solution and related details are for further study

Moved by:

Seconded by:

Technical motion (>=75%)

Yes / No / Abstain

Baseline Proposal #2

Page 28: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 28 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

The PHY shall support multiple modulation and coding

schemes (MCS) to enable adaptation to different channel

conditions. Each MCS is defined by a particular modulation

order and a coding rate.

Moved by:

Seconded by:

Technical motion (>=75%)

Yes / No / Abstain

Baseline Proposal #3

Page 29: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 29 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Summary

OFDM Features Key Benefits

Wideband • High spectral usage since guard bands are not needed between

bonded channels – high spectral efficiency

Flexibility • Easily adaptable to different spectrum configurations, based on

the availability of RF bandwidth

• Easily extendable to newly available spectrum

Multicarrier • Each subcarrier passes through a flat channel so there is no

need for equalization at the receiver – low complexity

• No inter subcarrier and no inter OFDM symbol interference

Modulation • High-order QAM – each subcarrier modulated with a high-order

QAM leading to very high spectral efficiency

• Adaptive modulation according to subcarrier quality

• Severely impaired subcarriers can be blanked – avoiding the

degradation of the transmission on other subcarriers

OFDMA • Enables utilization of large bandwidths

• Efficient multiuser access technique

• Reduces latency of transmission

Page 30: Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm

PAGE 30 IEEE 802.3bn Geneva, Switzerland 27-28 September 2012

Thank you