animal feed science and technology volume 63 issue 1-4 1996 [doi...

Upload: belinda-angel

Post on 04-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Animal Feed Science and Technology Volume 63 Issue 1-4 1996 [Doi 10.1016%2Fs0377-8401%2896%2901011-5] S. Giger-Reverdin; N. Bezault; D. Sauv

    1/14

    NIM L FEEDSC IENC E ND

    TECHNO LOG Y

    ELSEXIER Animal Feed Science Technology 63 (19 96) 149- 162

    Effects of a probiotic yeast in lactating ruminants:interaction with dietary nitrogen level

    S. Giger-Reverdin a* N. Bezault a, D. Sauvant a, G. Bertin b

    a Laborat oire de Nut ri t ion et Al imentati on (INR A) de l IN A-PG , 16 rue Claude Bernard, 7.5231 Paris Cedex05, Fran ceb SAN TEL Sante nimale Di rect io n R D, 85 rue Anat ol e France, 92300 Leuall ois-P err et , France

    Accepted5 M arch 1996

    Abstract

    This study was designed to test the effects of a probiotic yeast(Saccharom yces cereui sia eI -1077) at two levels of nitrogen intake in early lactation, expressedas PDI (Protein truly

    Digestible in the small Intestine) at normal levels of 108gPD Ikg- DM (dry matter) vs. lowlevels of 78 g P I kg- DM , on dry matter intake, milk production and composition and on bloodparam eters. Twenty-eight dairy goats received a comp lete diet including alfalfa hay (25% of drymatter), press ed sugar beet pulp silage (50% ) and a compoun d feed (25%). S upplying yeastdecreas ed energy and nitrogen balances during the first 6 week s after parturition. Yeas t seemed tofacilitate increased m obilization of body reserves and to increase milk fatty acid production. Thus,fat-corrected milk yield increased during the period when animals are very susceptible tonutritional stress.

    Keyw ords: Probiotic yeast; Dairy ruminants; Metabolism; Milk yield

    1. Introduction

    The ability of probiotic yeasts to increase dry matter (DM) intake, modify rumenstoichiometry, and increase m ilk yield and milk protein content in lactating rum inantshas been established for early lactating ruminants (Giinther, 1989; Harris and Webb,1990; Williams et al., 1991). However, not all studies have found these effects (Arambeland Kent, 1990; Wohlt et al., 1991). Nevertheless, researchers agree that yeast limits thedecrease in pH when large quantities of easily fermentable carbohydrates are ingested,

    Corresponding author.

    0377-8401/96/ 1_5.00Copyright 0 1996Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.PI I SO377-8401(96)01011-5

  • 8/13/2019 Animal Feed Science and Technology Volume 63 Issue 1-4 1996 [Doi 10.1016%2Fs0377-8401%2896%2901011-5] S. Giger-Reverdin; N. Bezault; D. Sauv

    2/14

    150 S. Giger-Reverdin et al./Animal Feed Science Technology 63 1996) 149-162

    and seems to stimulate microbial activity, especially that of the cellulolytic microflora(Arambel and Kent, 1990; Williams and Newbold, 1990; Williams et al., 1991).

    The a im of this study w as to clarify the effects of a probiotic yeast (Succharomycescereuisiae I- 1077) whose positive influence on ruminal production of volatile fatty acids

    has already been shown (Jouany et al., 1991) in ruminants at the onset of lactation, whenanimals are affected by negative nutritive balances, and are thus more susceptible tobenefit from the use of such products (Chase, 1989). This study used two nitrogen (N)levels to test potential interactions (yeastX N supply), and especially to investigate thepossible beneficial effects of yeast with nitrogen-deficient diets. In addition to thedifferent effects of yeast on fundam ental zootechnical parameters (e.g. intake, milkyield), nutritional balances, blood parameters and fatty acids secretion in milk weremeasured in the same animals.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Experi mental design and t reatm ent s

    The study w as conducted on 28 dairy goats in the experimental herd of the Nutritionand Feeding Station (INRA) of the Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon.Alpine or Saanen goats were assigned to seven blocks of four animals each as a functionof parity (two blocks for the first lactation), prior milk production for multiparous goatsand estimated production for primiparous, type of aS1 casein, and liveweight.

    Animals within each block were randomized among the following four groups: CLw-control, low nitrogen: CNl-control, normal nitrogen; YLw -yeast, low nitrogen;YN I-yeast, normal nitrogen. The four groups made up a 2X 2 factorial design, withinwhich each of the three effects (yeast, nitrogen, parity) w ere tested in 14 pairs.

    2.2. Diets

    All goats were fed on alfalfa hay (25% of DM), pressed sugar beet pulp silage (50%)and a compound feed (25%), in which the composition was varied according to the

    Table 1Composition of compound feeds

    glcg- Diet

    Low in nitrogen (Lw) Normal in nitrogen (NI)

    Barley 370 18.5

    Maize grain 370 92

    Oats 185 185

    Soyabean meal 0 463

    Sodium bicarbonate 45 45

    Mineral and vitamin premix a 30 30

    Premix contained P 20.0 . Ca O.O , Mg 5.0 , S 2.0 , Cu ISOOppm, Fe 3000ppm, Zn 7500ppm. Mn

    4500ppm, Vitamin A 45OoOOIU, Vitamin D, 15OOOOIU, Vitamin E 3001U.

  • 8/13/2019 Animal Feed Science and Technology Volume 63 Issue 1-4 1996 [Doi 10.1016%2Fs0377-8401%2896%2901011-5] S. Giger-Reverdin; N. Bezault; D. Sauv

    3/14

  • 8/13/2019 Animal Feed Science and Technology Volume 63 Issue 1-4 1996 [Doi 10.1016%2Fs0377-8401%2896%2901011-5] S. Giger-Reverdin; N. Bezault; D. Sauv

    4/14

    T

    e3

    Mkpo

    o

    c

    aesc

    og

    s

    B

    De

    Pmpo

    M

    po

    SM

    Sg

    c

    E &

    YW

    CW

    Y

    C

    Y

    N

    Y

    P

    Y

    Y

    e3

    Mkcm

    o

    (gk

    2

    F

    41ab

    46a

    46a

    49b

    40

    40

    17

    *

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    5

    Poen

    30a

    32a

    39a

    31a

    34

    32

    07

    N

    N

    N

    N

    *

    *

    g

    L

    o

    45a

    48a

    46

    42a

    57u

    43u

    07

    N

    N

    N

    **

    N

    N

    e

    Ah

    78a

    76a

    77a

    80

    78

    78

    02

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    $

    Dym

    e

    1

    3a

    1

    2a

    1

    1a

    1

    8a

    1

    4

    1

    9

    27

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    B

    Ue

    02

    a

    03=

    04

    b

    04

    b

    03

    03

    @

    00

    N

    **

    N

    N

    N

    Yedp

    d

    g

    M

    )

    %

    Mk

    1

    a

    1

    a

    1

    a

    1

    a

    1

    1

    1

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    2

    FCM

    1

    1

    b

    2

    a

    1

    ab

    1

    1

    1

    *

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    %

    F

    79

    ab

    57

    a

    83

    b

    66

    ab

    68

    74

    07

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    g

    Poen

    59

    a

    44

    a

    57

    a

    57a

    53

    55

    05

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    F 2

    L

    o

    86

    a

    67

    a

    88

    a

    82

    a

    80

    82

    07

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    N

    z

    Yw

    Y

    a

    ow

    nno

    Cw

    c

    o

    a

    ow

    nno

    Y

    y

    a

    nm

    nno

    C

    c

    o

    a

    nm

    nno

    YY

    Nno

    P

    g2

    p

    yM

    M

    a

    cwg

    FCM

    3gk

    acee

    mkM

    n

    b

    n

    thsm

    su

    p

    lee

    whn

    ow

    aesg

    c

    y

    dee

    (P