ankit final report

Variable Axis Hybrid Layered

Manufacturing

Thesis

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Technology

by

Ankit Desai (133100069)

under the supervision of

Prof. K. P. Karunakaran

Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Bombay

June 2015

Declaration

I declare that this thesis represents my own ideas in my own words and where

others ideas or words have been included, I have adequately cited and references

the original sources. I also declare that I have adhered to all principles of academic

honesty and integrity and have not misrepresented or fabricated or falsified any

idea/data/fact/source in my submission. I understand than any violation of the

above will be cause for disciplinary action by the institute and can also evoke penal

action from the source which has thus not been properly cited or from whom proper

permission has not been taken when needed.

Ankit Desai

M.Tech Student

Roll No. 133100069

Approval Sheet

This Thesis entitled Variable Axis Hybrid Layered Manufacturing by Ankit

Desai (Roll No. 133100069) is approved for the final submission of M.Tech Project

at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, IIT Bombay.

Examiners

________________________

________________________

Supervisor

________________________

Chairman

________________________

Date:____________

Place:____________

i

Abstract

Hybrid Layered Manufacturing (HLM) is an Additive Manufacturing (AM) process of metals

which combines the benefits of both additive and subtractive manufacturing techniques. The

integration is in such a manner that the weld-deposition can act as an additional feature to

an existing CNC machine without disturbing its other capabilities . The deposition of metal

according to the generated toolpath is done using a Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) gun.

After the deposition of near net shape, the machining process is used for achieving the

dimensional accuracy.

The main goal of the present work is to solve the current issues in HLM and increase the

capabilities. Like any other AM processes, HLM proceeds in a layer by layer manner. CAD

model of the desired component is sliced into thin layers and toolpath is generated for each

layer. In HLM process, no support material is used for deposition of undercuts/overhang

features. The need for support mechanism is eliminated using 5-Axis deposition. The featured

based deposition AM can fabricate the complex geometries by 5-Axis HLM process. Also the

implementation of this method can save material and time during deposition. The capability

of this novel method is proved by an example of complex IC-7 housing component.

Instead of starting the deposition from base metal plate and remove it by machining after

deposition, if we use the plate as integral substrate then it increases the strength of the

component. Also the efficiency of the AM process increases if we get the best engagement

of the substrate with the component by reducing the wastage material. New deposition

method with integral substrate has been introduced and discussed in detail with the example

of turbine blade.

In CNC machine the available workspace for deposition is reduced because of offset in

mounting the gun. For tool steel and exotic materials (Ni and Tin alloys), preheating, stress

relieving and inspection after every deposition are required. Conceptual and final design for

the integrated multi-station HLM has been suggested which can be resolve the existing

issues.

The residual stresses are one of the main issue in HLM process which can be overcome

by mechanical pining process. A pneumatic hammer has been used for this purpose which is

modified as per the requirement and retrofitted on the same CNC machine. A model has been

developed to predict the hammer frequency and compared with the measured frequency by

experiments. The main purpose of calculating the frequency is to find out the optimal feed

rate of hammer.

ii

GTAW process can give a better quality of bead as compare to GMAW process. Hence

this process has been explored in this work and experiment are performed for different

process parameters. The experiments are divided into three major parts: Single bead

experiments, Multi bead experiments and Multi layer experiments.

Keywords: Rapid Manufacturing, Rapid Prototyping, Hybrid Layered Manufacturing,

Feature Based Slicing, Integral Substrate, Multi-Station HLM, 5-axis, Cold working,

GMAW, GTAW

ii

Contents

Abstract i

Contents ii

List of Figures iv

List of Tables vii

1. Introduction

1.1 Rapid Manufacturing 1-1

1.1.1 Laser-based AM processes 1-4

1.1.2 Electron beam-based AM processes 1-6

1.1.3 Arc-based AM processes 1-7

1.2 Hybrid Layered Manufacturing 1-10

1.2.1 Modes of HLM 1-11

1.2.2 Capabilities of HLM 1-14

1.2.3 Software feature required 1-16

1.2.4 Need for DelCAM 1-17

1.2.5 Existing issues with HLM 1-18

1.3 Problem Definition 1-19

1.4 Organization of the Report 1-19

2. Variable Axis Deposition

2.1 Introduction 2-1

2.2 Planar Deposition 2-1

2.2.1 3-axis deposition 2-1

2.2.2 5-axis deposition 2-3

2.3 Featured Based Deposition 2-9

2.3.1 Implementation procedure for a complex part 2-10

iii

2.4 Summary 2-19

3. Integral Substrate Method


3.2 Methodology 3-1

3.2.1 Maximum consumable volume of substrate 3-1

3.2.2 Slicing and near net CAD model 3-4

3.2.3 Toolpath generation 3-5

3.3 Implementation Details in a CAM Package 3-6

3.4 Result Analysis 3-8

3.5 Summary 3-11

4. An Integrated Multi-Station HLM


4.2 Need for Integrated Multi-Station HLM 4-1

4.3 Facilities in Integrated Multi-Station HLM 4-2

4.3.1 Preheating / TIG deposition 4-2

4.3.2 MIG deposition 4-3

4.3.3 Face milling 4-4

4.3.4 Inspection 4-4

4.3.5 Cold working 4-5

4.4 Proposed Conceptual Design of Integrated Multi-Station HLM 4-6

4.5 Final Design of Integrated Multi-Station HLM 4-8

4.5.1 Advantages of lead screw mechanism over scissor lift 4-11

4.6 Summary 4-11

5. In-situ CNC Integrated Pneumatic Hammer


5.2 Need of Pneumatic Hammer in HLM 5-1

5.3 Principle of Operation of a Pneumatic Hammer 5-2

5.3.1 Air pass operations in pneumatic hammer 5-3

iv

5.4 Experimental Setup on CNC Machine 5-5

5.4.1 Process parameters for pneumatic hammer peening 5-6

5.5 Frequency Measurement of Pneumatic Hammer 5-7

5.6 Advantage and Limitation of the Pneumatic Hammer Peening 5-11

5.7 Summary 5-12

6. GTAW for Hybrid Layered Manufacturing


6.2 Single Bead Experiments 6-2

6.3 Multi Bead Experiments 6-5

6.4 Multi Layer Experiments 6-5

6.4.1 Hardness test 6-6

6.4.2 Microstructure analysis 6-6

6.4.3 X-ray results 6-9

6.5 Directional Problem in GTAW Deposition 6-10

6.6 Summary 6-11

7. Conclusion and Future Scope

7.1 Conclusion 7-1

7.2 Future Scope 7-2

References R-1

iv

List of Figures

1.1 Rapid Prototyping Process Flow 1-2

1.2 Classification of Rapid Manufacturing Technologies 1-3

1.3 Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS) 1-5

1.4 Boeing components made using LAM 1-6

1.5 Gas Metal Arc Welding process 1-8

1.6 Schematic of CMT equipment 1-10

1.7 3-Axis HLM - CNC Machine and the welding gun retrofitment 1-12

1.8 5-Axis HLM - CNC Machine and the welding gun retrofitment 1-13

1.9 Capabilities of HLM 1-14

1.10 CAD model of the Impeller 1-15

1.11 Impeller: (a) Near net shape (b) after finish-machining 1-16

2.1 (a) Orientation 1: Conceptually easy to build using HLM. (b) Orientation

2: Impossible to build using HLM due to absence of support.

2-2

2.2 Slicing - layer thickness adjustment for locally topmost slices: (a)

original solid model, (b) sliced model with constant layer thickness, and

(c) sliced model with adjusted layer thickness

2-3

2.3 (a) Normal position - Greater overhang. Droplet falls off. (b) Tilted

position - Overhang in line with the torch. The table is tilted to capture

the falling droplet

2-4

2.4 Torch vector computed as a cross product of the normal and direction

vectors

2-5

2.5 (a) Object to be sliced. Total Z-height = 60mm (b) After slicing is

complete. The loops in all slice layers combined

2-7

2.6 (a) The 21 slice planes. (b) An intermediate slice 2-7

2.7 (a) The loops in two close slices (b) Re-pointed loops 2-8

2.8 The ruled surfaces between the two slices. The short yellow lines depict

the torch vector

2-8

v

2.9 (a) An example for sharp overhang in part (b) Planar slicing of the part 2-9

2.10 (a) Sub-volume 1 that can be built in +Z direction (b) Sub-volume 2 that

can be built in radial direction

2-10

2.11 Different view of a complex IC-7 housing part 2-11

2.12 Sharp overhang in the part while deposition is taking place in +z

direction

2-11

2.13 Deposited few planar layers and supporting cap for the overhang portion 2-12

2.14 Identification of the base cylinder 2-12

2.15 Decomposed complex part into four sub-volumes 2-13

2-16 (a) 3-Axis Slicing of the base cylinder for deposition (b) An intermediate

slice with toolpath (contour parallel strategy)

2-14

2.17 (a) Selection of the base surface (b) Adding the selected layer into

another level

2-15

2.18 (a) Scaling the base surface (b) Copy of offset surfaces 2-15

2.19 (a) Complete slicing of the part (b) Selected slice to intersect with the

part (c) An intermediate slice with the intersection

2-16

2.20 (a) Strategy selection (b) Generate of tool path in a conformal slice 2-17

2.21 (a) Upper cylinder on top of radial part (b) 3-Axis planar slice of the

upper cylinder

2-18

3.1 (a) CAD model of the turbine blade, (b) The integral substrate at centre

of component

3-2

3.2 Best position finding 3-3

3.3 (a) Best position of the substrate with work piece at z=-1 (b) Volume of

component covered by substrate

3-3

3.4 (a) Sliced component by Gati-Nirman (b) Sliced component with

substrate (substrate slices are removed)

3-4

3.5 (a) Contours on each Slice of the component from both face of the

substrate (b) Extruded volume of the contours on each slice (near net

CAD model)

3-5

3.6 Toolpath generation for entire component by Gati-Nirman 3-5

vi

3.7 Contour parallel toolpath (a) 1st layer with 1 contour (b) 8th layer with 4

contour (c) 1st extruded volume (d) 8th extruded volume

3-6

3.8 Flow chart for generalized CAM package implementation 3-7

3.9 Bounding box calculation for subtractive process 3-8

3.10 Central consumable substrate 3-9

3.11 Deposited layers of turbine blade by integral substrate method 3-11

4.1 Maximum temperatures (K) during the deposition of the first track for the

preheated and non-preheated substrates

4-3

4.2 Defected parts (a) Porosity defect, (b) Unfilled area 4-4

4.3 Current setup for shot peening hammer 4-6

4.4 Conceptual Design of Multi-Station HLM 4-6

4.5 Table with 4-axis motion 4-7

4.6 A scissor lift to achieve the Z motion 4-8

4.7 (a) and (b) Final Design of Multi-Station HLM 4-9

4.8 Deposition station with hydraulic arrangement 4-9

4.9 (a) Base with slots for lead screw and guide rods (b) Ground with slotting

for installing

4-10

5.1 (a) Different components of in-situ pneumatic hammer (b) CAD model of

pneumatic hammer (c) In-situ CNC integrated pneumatic hammer

5-2

5.2 Different air pass operations 5-5

5.3 (a) and (b) Design option of housing and clamping for hammer on CNC

machine, (c) Drilled holes to attach with machine, (d) Circular track to

provide circular motion

5-6

5.4 (a) Aluminum long plate for marking the indent (b) Indentation marks on

plate at different pressure

5-7

5.5 (a) Cross section view of the air cylinder of the pneumatic hammer (b)

Free body diagram of piston

5-8

5.6 (a) Graph of displacement vs time for 1 bar air pressure (b) Zoom portion

of the same graph

5-9

5.7 (a) Graph of displacement vs time for 3.5 bar air pressure (b) Zoom

portion of the same graph

5-10

vii

5.8 Graph for comparison of the experimental and predicted frequency 5-10

5.9 Graph for diameter of indentation at different pressure 5-11

6.1 Optimal Nozzle and wire position for 1.2 mm diameter 6-2

6.2 Image obtained from the stereo microscope of the single bead cut section 6-3

6.3 Results of penetration, width and height for single weld bead for different

wire feeds

6-4

6.4 Layer thickness with stepover increment 6-5

6.5 (a) Microstructure of top layer (grain size 4.39 m) (b) Microstructure of

bottom layer (grain size 8.9 m) (c) Microstructure of middle layers (grain

size 5.33 m and 6.75 m)

6-8

6.6 X-ray results of the multi layer block (a) from top surface (b) from side 6-9

6.7 (a) Standoff distace 5 mm which is optimal (b) standoff distance 7mm 6-10

6.8 Height and width of circular weld bead at different points 6-10

vii

List of Tables

1.2 Various deposition-based RM processes according the energy source used 1-4

1.3 Specifications of the weld-deposition unit 1-10

3.1 Volume of the component covered by the substrate at different level 3-2

3.2 Extruded volume of each layer 3-9

5.1 Comparison of the experimental and predictable frequency for different

pressure values

5-10

6.1 Parameters influencing the experiments 6-1

6.2 Results of hardness test on the sample 6-6

6.3 Grain size of different layers 6-9

Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1 Rapid Manufacturing

Rapid Prototyping (RP) is a relatively old technology with the earliest references as old as 25

years ago. It was in the late 1980s that this term grabbed the attention of researchers worldwide.

In 1988 the first commercial Rapid Prototyping system was born. The development was closely

related to the development of applications of computers in industry. RP was a follow up of the

development in CAD, CAM and CNC technologies. Also known as Layered Manufacturing (LM)

or sometimes as Additive Manufacturing (AM) depending on the context, RP uses a very simple

approach of manufacturing complex 3D objects. The complex geometry is first divided into 2D

slices that individually are very easy to manufacture. These slices are then combined using

different techniques to realise the complete geometry. Initially as the name suggests, RP was used

primarily for prototypes only. Even today these prototypes are used as visualization tools, to

evaluate the feasibility of shapes and to realise assemblies before actual manufacture. Prototypes

play several important roles during product development including learning and experimentation,

testing and proving, communication and interaction, synthesis and integration. Queries regarding

design issues can be addressed by constructing and studying prototypes [1]. A schematic diagram

of the Rapid Prototyping process flow is shown in Figure 1.1. The main reasons that restricted RP

to prototyping and tooling alone were:

Low accuracy or poor quality of the prototype produced,

Relatively large time required to produce the prototype inspite of its 'rapidity', and

High cost of each component.

Though RP greatly accelerated the conventional prototyping process, it was still not fast,

cheap and accurate enough to be classified as a suitable technique for manufacturing parts on a

large scale. These are the major bottlenecks that hinder the evolution of RP into Rapid

Manufacturing (RM).

In spite of its limitations in the earlier years, RP still plays a major role as a time compression

technology. Presence of RP techniques greatly accelerates the product development cycle and

reduces the time between the concept and the final product.

Chapter 1 Introduction

1-2

Figure: 1.1 Rapid Prototyping Process Flow [2]

RP has effected several direct benefits to product designers, tooling and manufacturing

engineers, and indirect benefits to marketing and the consumers. This encouraged creativity on

the part of the manufacturers and allowed them to be agile to consumer demands. RP sources its

greatest strengths from:

The simplicity of its 'divide and conquer' concept in manufacturing various shapes

Maximal automation of the fabrication process with minimalistic human intervention.

As a user of this technology, one only has to generate a CAD model of the desired product

which should clearly define the volume enclosed. The closed solid or surface model is then

triangulated and transformed into a Stereo-lithography (STL) format. Then a computer program

slices the model in cross-sections at various Z-levels. Each cross-section is then individually built

by solidification of liquid or powder or deposition of materials and they are then combined to

form a 3D model.

With advancement in technology, availability of accurate deposition techniques and new

deposition materials, the RP process has become faster and accurate over the years. Today AM is

just one aspect in a greater set of RM technologies.

Classification of Rapid Manufacturing

Rapid Manufacturing can be classified into six different groups [3] as shown in Figure 1.2:

CNC Machining: It is a purely subtractive process with outstanding product quality. Completely

automated process and when combined with intelligent CAM programs transforms into a

computer-aided process planning and execution system.

Laminated Manufacturing: In this process objects are built up layer-by-layer. Each layer

typically consists of adhesive-coated paper or plastic and is glued to the preceding layer.


1-3

Power-bed technologies: This process uses layer by layer of additive manufacturing with powder

as raw material. Common joining methods employ use of lasers (Selective laser sintering),

electron beam (Arcam's EBM), electric arc, liquid binder (3D Printing).

Deposition technologies: The material on a layer is deposited by heating and extrusion through a

nozzle as in the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) process. Sacrificial support mechanism is

necessary for building overhanging features.

Hybrid technologies: These combine the advantages of both additive and subtractive processes.

The Hybrid Layered Manufacturing process which is the focus of this report features in this

section.

Rapid Casting technologies: These include pattern-less casting methods in which the mould is

produced without the use of a pattern. Besides RP processes can also be used to make reusable

patterns and consumable patterns (for investment casting).

Many of the AM techniques are popularly generalized as 3D printing methods today.

Recently with the availability of desktop 3D printers at low costs, it has become possible for the

common public to purchase and use this technology. This has led to the birth and growth of

several creative projects. 3D printing of even food is envisaged. Such examples highlight the

tremendous potential of AM technology. Manufacturing today is no longer limited to the shop

floors or industries but can also be done by ordinary users on their desktops.

Figure: 1.2 Classification of Rapid Manufacturing Technologies [3]


1-4

In additive manufacturing using deposition, the metal is deposited only in the required regions

in a layer-by-layer manner. The material can be fed either in the form of wire or powder. The

deposition technologies employ laser, electron beam or electric arc as the sources of thermal

energy for melting the metal, in the order of their present popularity. Table 1.2 lists various

existing technologies in each category. These three groups of deposition processes are discussed

further in the following sub-sections.

Table 1.1 Various deposition-based RM processes according the energy source used [4]

Energy Source Name

Laser

Direct Metal Deposition (DMD)

Directed Light Fabrication (DLF)

Laser Additive Manufacturing (LAM)

Laser Aided Manufacturing Process (LAMP)

Laser Based Additive Manufacturing (LBAM)

Laser Based Direct Metal Deposition (LBDMD)

Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS)

Rapid Direct Metal Deposition

Electron Beam Electron Beam Freeforming

Arc

3D Micro Welding (3DMW)

3D Welding

3D Welding and Milling

Hybrid Layered Manufacturing (HLM)

Hybrid Plasma Deposition and Milling (HPDM)

Micro-Plasma Arc Welding (MPAW)

Shape Deposition Manufacturing (SDM)

1.1.1 Laser-based RM processes

Laser Engineered Net-Shaping (LENS) originally developed at Sandia National Laboratory, USA,

and further developed and marketed by OptoMec, USA, is the most popular commercial laser-

based RM process [5]. LENS is capable of handling a variety of metallic powders including Ti. Its

deposition head uses 1 kW or 2 kW laser which is at the centre. It is surrounded by 2 or 4 nozzles

(Figure 1.3b). This head is mounted on a XYZ manipulator. When the head is moved over a

substrate, it create a moving weld pool into which the powders from the nozzles dive and get

integrated (Figure 1.3a). As the powder used is fine, fluidized feeding using argon is employed.

By moving the welding head along appropriate raster and contouring paths, the object is built in


1-5

layers. It permits usage of different powders through different nozzles with the ability to control

their flow rate independently. Thus, LENS is capable of building gradient objects.

(a) (b)

Figure 1.3 Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS) (a) Schematic of the LENS process (b) Wall-

shaped build in progress using the LENS process [6]

Directed Light Fabrication (DLF) developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory is also very

similar to LENS. Interestingly, it is designed as a retrofitment to an existing CNC machine,

similar to HLM process.

Laser Additive manufacturing (LAM), developed by AeroMet corp, USA is a similar RM

method aimed at producing large parts from reactive materials such as titanium for aerospace

applications. Preliminary work done by AeroMet indicates that the process is capable of

producing sound Ti-6Al-4V material with acceptable mechanical properties for a multitude of

aerospace applications [7]. They have also supplied non-critical Titanium components for Boeing

with significant success (Figure 1.4). The undercuts of the CAD model were suppressed and

suitable machining allowance was added. This near-net shape was built using an 18 kW laser on a

2.5 axis machine.

To overcome the height control problem and ensure accuracy without any need of feed-back

control, Choi et al., of Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) introduced face milling


1-6

for every layer after metal deposition. The near-net shape obtained is finish milled on the same

platform. Its hybrid nature is similar to HLM. They have used this process to successfully

manufacture injection moulds. They also claim using wire as the raw material instead of

powdered metal.

Figure 1.4 Boeing components made using LAM [7]

1.1.2 Electron beam-based RM processes

Fluidized powder feeding uses pressurized argon. Therefore, this method of feeding powder is not

suitable for electron beam deposition which has to maintain a very high vacuum in the build

environment. Hence, in the case of electron beam, only powder-bed technology and not

deposition technology is popular. The RM process of Wanjara et al., of Institute for Aerospace

Research, Canada is one of the early attempts of electron beam based deposition. They have

overcome the problem of fluidized feeding of the powder by using a solid wire feed [8]. Electron

beam based deposition has the potential for a higher quality deposit, i.e. build-ups with: (1) lower

porosity and (2) fewer inclusions from the natural oxide present at the surface of powder materials

for aerospace grades. However, controlling the interaction between the electron beam and a thin

wire in the fusion zone requires particular regulation of the wire feeding rate, angle and height in

relation to the beam parameters in order to obtain a sound deposit is a major challenge in this

method.


1-7

1.1.3 Arc-based RM processes

Arc-based RM processes contains GTAW, GMAW and PAW. Some of the researcher combines

the GTAM and PAW. The GMAW is mainly use in RM lab which has been described in detail. A

novel freeform fabrication method named 3D Micro Welding (3DMW) has been developed using

an idea to combine freeform fabrication method with GTAW by researchers of Osaka University,

Japan [9-10]. When pulsed micro-arcs are emitted, the tip of a thin metal wire with a diameter of

0.10.3mm is fused and a micro metal bead is formed instantaneously. A fused bead is welded to

a metal substrate or previously formed beads. By continuing this process and building up hot

beads layer by layer under the control of CAD/CAM system, 3D metal objects can be produced. It

can be applied not only to titanium, but to other refractory metals such as tantalum, tungsten due

to the high dense energy beam of the micro arc. When two different thin metal wires such as Ti

and Ni, Ni and Al are fed alternately from the opposed spools, it is possible to build 3D complex

structures and components composed of their alloys or inter-metallic compounds [10].

KIST also has worked in GMAW based hybrid RM process. In fact, they had mounted on the

spindle head of the same CNC machine a laser torch and two GMAW torches [11]. Thus, this

platform could be used for both laser and arc deposition studies. The substrate plate is fixed on

top of a preheating fixture mounted on the machine table. Two different welding wire

sizes/materials are used in these torches. Use of different diameter wires permits the interior of the

layer to be filled fast by the thick wire and the periphery by the thin wire accurately. Face milling

is performed after depositing each layer. Although the layers may be deposited in uniform

thicknesses, face milling is used to obtain adaptive layers; however, this is at the expense of

material wastage. In milling operation, the top as well as the sides of the slice is machined to a

specified height and width before depositing new layer upon the previous one. This procedure is

repeated until the entire part is complete.

Direct Metal Deposition (DMD) developed at Southern Methodist University, USA is another

3D Welding process which uses Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) instead of GMAW [12].

Although they used GMAW in the beginning, they subsequently shifted to GTAW as they found

it much more controllable process for deposition with fewer problems of sputtering, intensive

heating, smoke etc. They have also used variable polarity GTAW for rapid prototyping of

aluminium alloy.


1-8

Gas Metal Arc Welding

In Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) a continuous and consumable wire electrode and a shielding

gas are fed through a welding torch. An electric arc established between the work piece and the

consumable wire electrode continuously melts the wire as it is fed into the weld puddle. The

molten pool is masked by the shielding gas.

Figure 1.5 Gas Metal Arc Welding process [13]

The arc, known as plasma, is a column of electrically and thermally excited gas atoms

and ionized metal vapours from the electrode material (Figure 1.5). This plasma is as hot

as 6,000C. This intense heat causes the gas atoms in the arc to break into positive ions

and electrons. Electrons move from cathode to anode and the positive ions move from

anode to cathode. Although both AC and DC power can be used for arc welding, the most

preferred in GMAW is DC either in continuous or pulse form.

Welding gas is used for shielding or masking the weld pool from atmospheric contamination

as well as to provide lower Ionization Potential (IP). Depending on the welding gas used, GMAW

may be known as Metal Inert Gas (MIG) or Metal Activated Gas (MAG) welding. In MIG

welding, the shielding gas is an inert gas like He or Ar or their mixture. MAG welding uses active

gases such as CO2, H2 and O2 and their mixture. When 100% CO2 is used, the MIG welding is

also known as CO2 welding.


1-9

CMT Pulsed DC with appropriate ramps is preferable to continuous DC as it gives stable arc

even at a lower mean current, thus reducing the heat input. However, in pulsed GMAW, the

operator is required to set the background current, peak current and their durations apart from the

parameters required to be controlled for successful operation in normal GMAW. As the

relationships among these parameters are too complex, setting their optimal values manually is

too difficult. This led to the development of synergic GMAW.

In synergic control, when an optimal combination of pulse parameters is set once for a given

wire feed rate and wire diameter, the system maintains the optimality for any change in the wire

feed rate. This implies that the burn off rate matches exactly the wire feed rate as dictated by the

initially set parameters. Thus it becomes a single knob control. The optimum applications

parameters are usually tuned into the welding machine by means of a microprocessor and a

software program. It is possible to achieve high torch speeds while keeping the spatter low

through synergic control. Accordingly, Fronius TPS-4000, a pulsed synergic GMAW was chosen.

This equipment, bought in 2001, was adequate for building monolithic objects. Building

composite objects requires two or more weld-deposition units. Therefore, Fronius TPS 2700

CMT, a next generation TPS GMAW machine was procured. Table 2.3 lists the specifications of

these two weld-deposition units.

Table 1.3 Specifications of the weld-deposition unit [4]

Feature CMT 2700

Make Fronius

Model TransPuls Synergic 2700 CMT

Torch Push-pull CMT type

Modes of operation Pulsed, synergic, CMT

Input power 3 400V 50/60Hz 6.6 kVA

Welding current range 3-270 A

Open circuit voltage 50 V

Working voltage 14.2 27.5 V

Efficiency 87%

In CMT the wire feeder is located near the welding torch thus eliminating the error due to

slacking of the wire. This also gives greater control over the movement of the wire. A wire buffer

located between the wire feeder and the welding tip decouples the two wire-drives from one


1-10

another and provides extra storage capacity for the wire. Figure 1.6 shows the schematic diagram

of CMT welding equipment.

Figure 1.6 Schematic of CMT equipment [14]

1.2 Hybrid Layered Manufacturing

Subtractive manufacturing or CNC machining can produce very accurate parts. But the process is

costly, may result in large wastage of material as chips and is slow due to human intervention in

the process planning. Besides it is not possible to CNC machine certain interior geometries, for

example, to manufacture conformal cooling channels in moulds. On the other hand, AM has total

automation but has poor quality of the component. Hybrid Layered Manufacturing (HLM)

process combines the better features of both these techniques. In this process, first the near-net

shape of the object is manufactured by layered deposition (Addition). The near-net shape is then

finish machined using CNC machining (Subtraction) [3].

Typically HLM may be achieved by the combination of CNC machining with either of

Laminated Manufacturing, Powder-bed technology, or Deposition technology. Deposition

processes commonly use arc, laser or electron beam as the energy source for metal deposition.

Powder based processes also use laser (SLS, 3D Systems, USA; EoS, Germany), electron beam

(Arcam, Sweden) or a jet of liquid binder (3DP, MIT, USA) for joining of layers.

In deposition based AM process; laser as a heat source has high precision but very poor

energy efficiency. Electron beam has better energy efficiency but is very costly due its

requirement for vacuum in working environment. Arc based deposition on the other hand has very


1-11

high energy density, excellent efficiency and is the cheapest of all the three. Deposition method is

very suitable for gradient objects and the component produced is fully dense as melting is

involved [4]. Powder-based techniques on the other hand may require post-process densification

through hot isostatic pressing (HIP). However unlike power-based, deposition method also

requires an explicit sacrificial support mechanism.

IIT Bombay's HLM is a RM technology that uses pulsed synergic Gas Metal Arc Weld

(GMAW) deposition of metal layers. Use of arc welding for RM of metallic objects was first seen

in 3D welding developed at the University of Nottingham (UK) and in Shape Deposition

Manufacturing (SDM) developed at CMU (USA) (Spencer et al. 1998; Merz et al. 1994). CMU's

SDM also uses deposition and milling. Two materials are used for deposition - one for the actual

model and the other as a support material. Typically, steel models employ the use of copper as

support. In sections of the model where the normal are oriented downwards, the deposition of

support material is required. SDM requires path planning and 5-Axis kinematics [15].

In IITB, GMAW deposition based facility for HLM exists. Composite injection molds with

conformal cooling channels have been manufactured using this process. Presently procurement of

GTAW equipment is in progress and the facility should be in effect soon.

1.2.1 Modes of HLM

One can classify the HLM process into two major modes: 3-Axis HLM and continuous 5-Axis

HLM. A third mode may be classified as indexed 5-Axis.

3-Axis HLM

The main steps involved in 3-Axis HLM are:

1. The CAD model is sliced into layers depending on the layer thickness value. The

intersection contours are generated in each layer.

2. For each layer, first the outer contours are deposited by a 2.5D planar toolpath.


1-12

3. Then the interior area of each layer is filled again by a 2.5D area-filling toolpath. The

toolpath may be either direction-parallel or contour-parallel.

4. Finally the top face of the area is face-milled using a large diameter end-mill cutter to

maintain the Z-accuracy of the build. Then the next layer is created, and this process

continues until the top most layer is reached.

Figure: 1.7 3-Axis HLM - CNC Machine and the welding gun retrofitment [4]

Experimental Setup: The 3-Axis HLM system comprises of a 3-Axis CNC machining centre

Argo 1050P and a Fronius TPS 4000 welding equipment. The Fronius welding gun is fitted on the

tool post without interfering with any other functionality of the machine (Figure 1.7). To enable

switchover from machining mode to ArcHLM mode and vice-versa a DPDT switch is introduced

in the controller circuitry. The switch routes the output of the coolant control relay to the welding

input. When in the ArcHLM mode the coolant on/off machine codes (M08, M09) caused the

welding to switch on and off respectively. Thus the coolant is disabled when using HLM on the 3-

Axis CNC machine. Only a single material can be deposited thus there is no provision for a

support mechanism.

5-Axis HLM

5-Axis kinematics is used to alleviate the need for a support mechanism. The main steps involved

in 5-Axis HLM are:


1-13

1. The CAD model is sliced into layers depending on the layer thickness value. The

intersection contours are generated in each layer. The surface normal data at each point on

the contour is also stored along with the contours. Storage of normal distinguishes this

slicing strategy that is termed as 5-Axis slicing.

2. For each layer, first the outer contours are deposited by a 5-Axis deposition toolpath.

During this deposition the welding-gun is aligned along the torch vector at that point on

the contour.

3. The interior area of each layer is filled by deposition by a simple 2.5D area-filling

toolpath as in the case of 3-Axis deposition.

4. Finally the top surface is face-milled for Z accuracy and the process is continued until the

top most layer is reached.

Thus in 5-Axis HLM, unlike 3-Axis, the welding gun is not always vertical. In both the cases,

the final product is obtained by finish machining the near-net shape.

Figure: 1.8 5-Axis HLM - CNC Machine and the welding gun retrofitment [16]


1-14

Experimental Setup: Any existing CNC machine can be modified with suitable retrofitment to

transform it into a HLM system without altering its original capabilities. The new 5-Axis HLM

system uses a 5-Axis Hermle C30U CNC machine along with the Fronius welding equipment

allowing both deposition and finish machining to be performed using all five axes. (Figure: 1.8).

Since the 5-Axis CNC has additional machine-code controlled relays the need for a mode-

changing switch was eliminated. Thus the machine is capable of both simultaneous subtractive

and additive manufacturing without any hardware reconfiguration and switching. This opens up

avenues to manufacture extremely complex components also. In fact the presence of additional

relays allows the possibility of controlled multiple material deposition. Thus we can have an

independent support mechanism and also manufacture objects with functional gradient of

material.

1.2.2 Capabilities of HLM

This hybrid route saves both time and cost by eliminating the need for roughing operation of a

purely subtractive process thus conserving material. The material is deposited only as per

requirement with only a slight allowance for finishing. The NC programming effort is also

reduced as the tool-paths to be generated for the deposition are planar and often simpler

depending on the strategy employed. As the object made is dense, it can be used functionally

rather than just as a prototype.

Figure: 1.9 Capabilities of HLM [16]


1-15

There are several prototyping, tooling and end-product manufacturing applications of GMAW

HLM that have already been realised. A summary of the capabilities of HLM is depicted in the

case studies shown in Figure 1.9. Using 3-Axis HLM alone the following have already been

manufactured:

Monolithic dies: Egg template of a Refrigerator

Dies with conformal cooling channels: Triangular cooling ducts in objects

Composite objects: Composite mould for rear light holder of a Bajaj Bike

Components without undercuts: Tall Al part for the Segmented Object Manufacturing

Machine

Components with undercuts: Monolithic Al-Si5 propeller

Using positional 5-Axis HLM components have been manufactured with several 3-Axis

features in different orientations. Example of a product of positional 5-Axis HLM is the

Aluminium casing for a pressure cooker.

Using continuous 5-Axis HLM complicated components such as impellers, blisks can also be

manufactured. This is especially useful for components with high overhang which cannot be

manufactured on 3-Axis machines. One of the greatest drawbacks of the HLM process is the

absence of support material. But it has been overcome to a large extent by the 5-Axis method.

Figure: 1.10 CAD model of the Impeller


1-16

As an exercise to demonstrate the 5-Axis HLM process to manufacture a complex geometric

component an impeller was manufactured. Manufacture is possible by CNC machining it out of a

cylindrical block. But as stated earlier it is a time consuming process and results in wastage of a

lot of material. A snap-shot of the impeller CAD model is shown in Figure 1.10. The near-net

shape and the final shape of the impeller are shown in Figures 1.11 (a) and 1.11 (b) respectively.

(a)

(b)

Figure: 1.11 Impeller: (a) Near net shape (b) after finish-machining

1.2.3 Software Feature Requirements

The following are the basic feature requirements of the software:

1. It should generate complete NC programs for both 3-Axis and 5-Axis HLM

2. It should accept parameters of the process (maximum layer thickness, welding speed,

welding current, range of permitted step over values etc) and the solid model as the input.

It should give a NC-program (or a set of NC-programs) for near net deposition as the

output

3. Given any solid model, it should be able to automatically slice the model and obtain the

layer-wise contours

4. If the process is 5-Axis HLM, then for each level it should be able to generate the

following


1-17

5-Axis toolpath of the outer contour with the welding gun aligned along the torch

vector

2.5-Axis area-filling toolpath that will fill the entire area inside the outer contour. The

area filling toolpath may be of any type - direction parallel (raster), contour parallel or

fractal based

5. If the process is 3-Axis HLM, then for each level it should be able to generate the

following

2.5-Axis toolpath of the outer contour with the welding gun aligned along the vertical

2.5-Axis area-filling toolpath that will fill the entire area inside the outer contour. The

area filling toolpath may be of any type - direction parallel (raster), contour parallel or

fractal based

1.2.4 Need for DelCAM

With a view to completely automate the near-net shape generation process, it is of paramount

importance that the deposition path of each layer is flawless. Hence the possibility of using a

professional CAM package for generating HLM toolpaths was explored. All conventional CAM

packages generate toolpaths for CNC machining. Professional CAM software for deposition are

rare. The challenge is in making the machining tool-paths double up as tool-paths for AM.

DelCAM's PowerMILL (CAM) and PowerSHAPE (CAD) are used for HLM. Use of PowerMILL

provides specific advantages over the existing HLM software system Gati. They are:

1. Proven functions: PowerMILL is a widely used software with proven toolpath generation

capabilities. It has several machining strategies including 2D strategies for slice area

clearance, which with certain changes can be used for the deposition toolpath.

2. In-built post processing: This reduces the hassles in generating the final NC program for

deposition and is irrespective of the CNC machine or controller used. Using DelCAM the

HLM software does not remain machine specific.


1-18

3. Integrated package for Addition and Subtraction: PowerMILL generates 5-Axis toolpaths.

Hence 5-Axis HLM and finish machining are also possible with this software. This is a

welcome change in terms of convenience as compared to the earlier situation when two

different softwares were used for deposition and finishing.

4. Smooth geometries: PowerMILL and PowerSHAPE work with smooth geometries.

Consequently the accuracy of the deposition toolpath along the contours is better.

1.2.5 Existing Issues with HLM

1. Gati-Nirman is an existing software developed in-house specifically for the HLM process

for slicing and then toolpath is generated in PowerMILL. The toolpath for planar slicing

can be generated and component can be produced by 3-axis and 5-axis. But there is no

such method for produce toolpath for continues 5-axis conformal slicing.

2. The base metal plate has been used for deposition which was removed by end milling

after near net shape part is formed. Due to this, difficulties have been occurred in re-

clamping and also base material is wasted which reduced efficiency of the HLM process.

3. Present HLM has only one station where deposition using GMAW and face milling is

done. Since the spindle axis and torch axis are apart by about 250 mm, this much traverse

is lost.

4. Currently there is no inspection system by which we can check the component defects

after each layer. Due to this, many times we come to know about defects after completing

whole part.

5. Due to thermal cycles (heat and phase change), warping takes place and cracking occurs

due to high stresses during deposition.

6. In MIG based deposition process spatter is a major issue with the component quality.

Also the wire feed is synergic with current so there is no independent control on the wire

feed rate.


1-19

1.3 Problem Definition

Based on the current capabilities and issues with HLM the aim of the project is to increase the

capability of current HLM facilities. This involves:

Exploration of building different geometric features including undercuts and to develop a

new Feature Based Conformal Additive Manufacturing method which can be produce

complex geometry parts.

Developing a new method with integral substrate, which can eliminate the requirement of

base metal and save deposited material as well as time by best fit of the substrate with the

component.

To design a new integrated multi-station HLM which contains preheating, stress relieving

and inspection by which we can reduce the current issues and produce defect less final

parts.

Pneumatic hammering is found to be the suitable solution for stress relieving of the

component. To find the optimal feed rate, a prediction model has to be developed for

calculation of the frequency of the hammer.

The new GTAW setup has to be installed and explored to make it suitable for HLM

process. Its parameters which influence the weld bead geometry and quality has to be

identified and optimized.

1.4 Organization of the Report

In this chapter, RM, its classification and the place of HLM in RM was briefly discussed. Some

other research groups using metal deposition for RM were identified. The 3-Axis and 5-Axis

HLM facility at IIT Bombay was described and its capabilities were summarised.

Chapter 2 is dedicated for conformal/non-planar slicing of the complex geometries. The major

part of this chapter describe the non-planar slicing procedure for complex IC-7 housing

component.


1-20

Chapter 3 describes new integral substrate method to reduce the wastage material in base

metal with the example of turbine blade.

Chapter 4 deals with new design for a new integrated multi-station HLM which can reduces

the defects with the help of preheating, stress relieving and inspection facilities in a same setup.

Chapter 5 describe an in-situ CNC integrated pneumatic hammer operation and its

requirements. Also a prediction model for frequency measurement of hammer is discussed.

Chapter 6 gives the process parameter optimization for new GTAW for HLM and various

experimental results for input and output parameters.

Chapter 7 provides a conclusion to this report and discusses the future scope.

Chapter 2

Variable Axis Deposition

2.1 Introduction

In HLM, the CAD model of the component has been sliced and tool path has been generated for

each slice before starting the deposition. The required layer for each slice of the component has

been built by moving the welding torch along the toolpath. The area-filling may follow any

suitable pattern. The deposition is mainly depend on the slicing orientation. This chapter describes

the slicing methods for various planar and non-planar deposition process

2.2 Planar Deposition

Planar deposition is adequate for simple applications such as dies and moulds and requires only

2.5-axis kinematics. In planar deposition, the deposition takes place in a single plane for all slices.

The planar slicing for 3-axis and 5-axis deposition process has been discussed below.

2.2.1 3-axis deposition

'Slicing for 3-Axis deposition' or sometimes called as '2D Slicing' is the simplest slicing approach

used to generate slice data for 3-Axis HLM. The model is scaled as per the required build

dimensions and accuracy and is oriented with respect to the build area. Typical parameters to be

considered when deciding the scaling and the orientation are the feasibility, ease of deposition,

build time, surface quality and distortion [17]. Since HLM does not use any support material, the

orientation assumes great importance as the build feasibility varies drastically from one

orientation to another. A sample object to be built using HLM is shown in Figure 2.1 (a). If

oriented in the way it is shown in the same figure, the object can be very easily built from bottom

to top. On the contrary, the same object kept in the orientation shown in Figure 2.1 (b) is

impossible to build using HLM due to the absence of support.

The build direction to be used while processing the CAD either must be set to the default Z

direction (as is the case in Gati-Nirman) or must be specified explicitly in the software. The Z-

direction mentioned here corresponds to the active workplane coordinate system of the CAD. In

machine coordinate terms the build direction is always along the positive Z axis.

Chapter 2 Variable Axis Deposition

2-2

(a) (b)

Figure 2.1 (a) Orientation 1: Conceptually easy to build using HLM. No undercuts. (b)

Orientation 2: Impossible to build using HLM due to absence of support.

Uniform or Adaptive Slicing

Slicing can be broadly classified as uniform and adaptive as described. In uniform slicing, as is

evident from the name, the thickness of each slice is the same throughout the model. Adaptive

slicing on the other hand uses a geometry-dependent value for layer thickness. Adaptive slicing

strategies lead to better surface finish as they reduce the staircasing effect commonly observed in

uniform slicing. But since finish machining is performed post deposition in HLM, the staircasing

effect is not at all seen in the final object irrespective of the slicing technique used and because of

HLM's inability to deposit layers of varying thicknesses, uniform slicing is preferred. Layer

thickness can be controlled to some extent by changing certain parameters like welding current,

wire feed rate and welding speed. But there is no electronic control of welding current or wire

feed. If the welding parameters for a layer are changed, other parameters like step-over value of

the tool-path in that layer will also have to be changed. This leads to unnecessary complications.

Hence uniform slicing is chosen for HLM.

Top-most slice considerations

In short 2D slicing of objects is done using DelCAM while keeping a uniform slice thickness.

Some potential pitfalls of the strategy occur when we have to slice the topmost layer of the model.

The actual material thickness in the last slice (on the top-most layer) of the model can be exactly


2-3

equal to the layer thickness or be less than that. Thus it is possible that the deposition thickness of

the last slice is not the same as the rest. As a result material may not get deposited. One solution is

to alter the layer thickness for that particular layer as in Figure 2.2 [17]. Since it is not possible to

deposit a layer of different thickness, as a work around, the loops of the lower slice are used as the

pattern to deposit in that layer. This ensures that without altering the layer thickness extra material

is deposited in such cases rather than lesser material. This extra material can then be removed

during the finished machining operation.

Figure 2.2 Slicing - layer thickness adjustment for locally topmost slices: (a) original solid

model, (b) sliced model with constant layer thickness, and (c) sliced model with adjusted layer

thickness [17]

2.2.2 5-axis deposition

The slicing method for 5-axis deposition is different from the 2D slicing described in the previous

topic as it also uses the surface normal data at the points in a sliced loop. This is used for 5-Axis

deposition of metal along the contour in each slice.

Need for 5-axis slicing

GMAW based HLM process uses only a single material for deposition and does not provide for a

supporting material. If the gun is constrained to remain vertical while deposition, the types of

components the process can manufacture get severely limited. When a layer above encompasses a

larger area than the layer below deposition becomes difficult without support. 3-axis deposition

allows a maximum upward and outward (or inward and downward) draft angles of 60 [18]

beyond which the weld droplet just falls off due to gravity. Hence due to the absence of support

system components with a very high over hang are difficult to build in 3-axis.


2-4

The solution to this problem is 5-axis deposition of the boundary contours. In 5-axis HLM at

IIT Bombay, the welding gun relative to the work plane has continuously variable five degrees of

freedom along the X, Y, Z, A and C axes. When depositing along the contours in a slice, the

welding nozzle aligns itself such that it points along the torch vector. The deposition becomes

undercut-free. This ensures that when a droplet of metal from the nozzle falls under gravity it is

incident at the right spot on the component being built. In short the table is titled to capture the

falling droplet. This not only increases the manufacturing capability of HLM to a variety of

objects but also produces a more accurate near-net shape as compared to the 3-axis deposition.

Figure 2.3 (a) shows the part orientation during 3-axis deposition, while Figure 5.1 (b) shows

actually how the part would orient during 5-axis deposition. 5-axis deposition requires the

computation of the torch vector and that brings 5-axis slicing into perspective.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2.3 (a) Normal position - Greater overhang. Droplet falls off. (b) Tilted position -

Overhang in line with the torch. The table is tilted to capture the falling droplet [19].

Methods of 5-axis slicing [19]

The essence of 5-axis HLM is to align the welding gun along the torch vector during deposition

along the contours. In the 5-axis Hermle C30U CNC machine, the toolpost always remains

vertical with respect to the earth while the bed moves along the A and C axes to provide 5-axis


2-5

control. During depositing the weld droplet falls vertically downwards due to gravity. The build

object is tilted such that the normal to the model surface becomes horizontal and thus orthogonal

to the welding gun. Here two methods for 5-axis slices are discussed as below.

(a) Cross product method

The torch vector at a point on a loop is calculated as the cross product of the surface normal

vector at that point on the object and the direction vector. The direction vector specifies the

direction in which the nozzle moves in X and Y. It is the position vector from that vertex on the

loop to the next vertex. Thus position vector is obtained from the slice contour itself and is always

in the slice plane. If the surface of the object is vertical and the slicing plane is parallel to the XY

plane, the torch vector is also vertical (in the positive Z direction).

To get the normal vector surface information is needed. In case the object is in the form of a

triangulated mesh the facet normal data is already stored in the STL file. When parsing the STL

file, along with the coordinates of the vertices, the normal of each triangle can be accessed. Gati-

Nirman which works on the STL file format uses this technique.

A schematic of the torch vector as a cross product is shown in Figure 2.4. Each loop is given

by a series of points:

= [ ]

Figure 2.4 Torch vector computed as a cross product of the normal and direction vectors [19].


2-6

where z remains constant for a slice. Each of these points is additionally associated with a

torch vector:

= [ ]

It is calculated as follows:

= pi+1 p

pi+1 p

(b) Double Slice Method

In some cases, the normal data to a point may not be easily accessible. For example, in

DelCAM, when slicing an object consisting of free-form surfaces, the normal at the slice points

can be found from the surface on which the point lies. This surface has to be identified first. If the

object contains a large number of such surfaces (a common occurrence in complex geometries)

then the task becomes tedious. Instead of calculating the torch vector via the cross product route,

one looks for other options to estimate the same. Intuitively the torch vector shows the direction

and the degree to which the model surface is inclined to the X-Y plane.

In the double slice method another slice is created at a small offset (example 0.1 mm) above

the slicing plane. For every ith contour on the lower slice say 0 there should exist a

corresponding contour on the slice above 1. If this condition is not satisfied, then a reduced or a

negative offset value is chosen. The two curves 0 and

1 are then repointed together so that they

are discretized into equal number of segments. They define a ruled surface between them. The

longitudes of the ruled surface give the direction of the torch vector. Another analogy that can be

drawn is that of a wireframe swarf. The tool axis or the gun is constrained to lie along the

longitudes.

The following examples with the set of figures better illustrate the working of this method.

The entire procedure was carried out in DelCAM PowerSHAPE. The object to be sliced is in

Figure 2.5 (a). The total Z-height of the object is 60mm and the object is broken into slices 3mm

thick. There are a total of 21 slicing planes as shown in Figure 2.6. The slice loops obtained are

shown in Figure 2.5 (b) - there are one or two loops per slicing plane. This is the result of the

conventional 2D Slicing described in the previous chapter. Next for every slice plane an

additional slice is created at a distance of 1.5mm above it.


2-7

(a) (b)

Figure 2.5 (a) Object to be sliced. Total Z-height = 60mm (b) After slicing is complete. The

loops in all slice layers combined [19].

Figure 2.6 (a) The 21 slice planes. (b) An intermediate slice [19].

The corresponding curves on the two slices are then re-pointed together (Figure 2.7). In this

case, the outer two curves are re-pointed to a 100 points, while the inner two curves are re-pointed


2-8

to 90 points. The numbers are arbitrary, but a typical re-pointing strategy would be to select the

number of points in proportion to the length of the curve. The hypothetical ruled surface between

the curves is given in Figure 2.8. The short yellow lines that connect the lower curves to the upper

curves give the approximate directions of the torch vector. The welding gun must be oriented

along these lines during deposition. The ruled surfaces are only for easy visualization of the torch

vector lines. During the execution of the program these surfaces are not actually created.

Figure 2.7 (a) The loops in two close slices (b) Re-pointed loops [19].

Figure 2.8 The ruled surfaces between the two slices. The short yellow lines depict the torch

Vector [19].


2-9

2.3 Feature Based Deposition

In the previous section only 2D planar slices were used for deposition in which first the outer

contour was deposited by 5-Axis and then the inside area filled by 3-Axis. The double slice

method can handle the overhang feature within certain limits. If the overhang angle is near 900

then this method is not capable of making the part. An example of annular shape is shown in

Figure 2.9(a) in which there is a sudden 900 overhang in the next layer as shown in Figure 2.9(b).

(a) (b)

Figure 2.9 (a) An example for sharp overhang in part (b) Planar slicing of the part

To overcome this problem a combined method is proposed which can utilize the advantages

of both planar as well as conformal slices to deposit such shapes. If the same component is built

using this combined strategy of planar and conformal slicing the part can be built in a single

setting. In order to do this, the part is first divided into two sub-volumes according to their build

directions. The decomposition done on the basis of the ease of deposition.

Figure 2.10 shows the two sub volumes of the component in (a) and (b). It can be noted that

the first sub volume can built in +Z direction by planar deposition only while the other sub

volume is deposited by cylindrical deposition. Hence the entire component can be deposited on a

5-Axis machine by HLM process in single setting and without any support material. Here the

slices of the second sub-volume are cylindrical due to cylindrical base; they may be different if

the base is of a different shape.


2-10

(a) (b)

Figure 2.10 (a) Sub-volume 1 that can be built in +Z direction (b) Sub-volume 2 that can be

built in radial direction

Feature-based slicing is important due to the following points:

1. Sharp undercuts and overhang feature can be realized on 5-Axis machine without any support

material.

2. The combined strategy can save the time and material during deposition as compared to

planar slicing.

3. A separate CAM module can be developed for similar shapes such as Impeller, Blisk, and Fan

etc. so that the process can become more generalized, automated and optimized for these

components.

2.3.1 Implementation Procedure for a Complex Part

In this section the process planning for conformal slicing and feature based deposition for a

complex IC-7 housing part is explained. The complex part is shown in Figure 2.11 which has

sharp overhang and undercut features. One method of manufacturing this component is by a

subtraction process where the part can be machined out from its bounding box but that will lead to

waste material and time. The other method is by additive manufacturing where the material is

deposited only where it is required. It can be observed that the part cannot be manufactured

without using any support material if the growth direction is in one single direction (+Z or any

other direction) due to the sharp overhangs as shown in Figure 2.12.


2-11

Figure 2.11 Different view of a complex IC-7 housing part

Another method that has been used many times in RM Lab, IIT Bombay (which is a definite

solution for such conditions) is the placement of a cap or a plate as a support structure where it is

required. These supporting caps are of the same material as the object so there is no need to

remove them. But these caps need to be made separately by machining or AM process that

required extra time on software as well as on machine. Also the placement of these supporting

caps interrupts the otherwise continuous fabrication process. An attempt has been made toward

this strategy as shown in Figure 2.13, the material deposited up to the starting of first sharp

overhang and the supporting cap to be placed on it.

Figure 2.12 Sharp overhang in the part while deposition is taking place in +z direction


2-12

\

Figure 2.13 Deposited few planar layers and supporting cap for the overhang portion

It can be observed that if the slices are conformal (cylindrical in this case), the part can be

manufactured without using any support mechanism. To avail the advantage of multi-axis

deposition so that the support can be eliminated this part should be built radially instead of in the

+Z direction. In Figure 2.14 the highlighted cylinder shows the base cylinder on which the next

sub-volume should be deposited radially.

Figure 2.14 Identification of the base cylinder

However the entire component cannot be built by depositing only in the radial direction, only

the portion that has no sharp overhang in radial direction can be built. The decomposed sub-


2-13

volumes are shown in Figure 2.15; these are shown according to their build sequence with their

build direction.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure 2.15 Decomposed complex part into four sub-volumes (a) base cylinder, +z build

direction (b) 2nd part, radial build direction (c) Upper cylinder +z build direction (d) Lower

cylinder -z build direction

Deposition of base Cylinder

The base cylinder shown in Figure 2.15 (a), this cylinder can be fabricated by 3-Axis deposition

on a base plate (rectangular/circular plate mounted on fixture) or the base itself could be a

cylinder in which case there is no need of the deposition. To deposit this cylinder simple planar

slicing will be required as there is no overhang/undercut; hence Gati-Nirman can be used to

generate the required NC programs. The minimum height of this cylinder should be greater than

its original height by diameter (+tolerance) of the welding gun so that the bottom most sub-

volume can be built on it without collision. Post deposition, the finish machining can be done to

its periphery to maintain the radial accuracy for the deposition of the next part. Figure 2.16 (a)


2-14

shows the planar slicing of the cylinder in Gati-Nirman and Figure 2.16 (b) shows an intermediate

layer with area filling toolpath (contour parallel).

(a) (b)

Figure 2.16 (a) 3-Axis Slicing of the base cylinder for deposition (b) An intermediate slice with

toolpath (contour parallel strategy)

Deposition of radial part

After finishing of the deposited base cylinder the radial part is deposited for which the cylindrical

slices are required (the required slices are cylindrical here because the base is a cylinder, in a

generalized way the slicing should be offset to the base shape). To make the process automatic for

conformal slicing the offset of the base is a generalized method. PowerSHAPE simplified this

process after exploring the various options, the steps for generating the conformal slices in

PowerSHAPE are:

1. Select the inner surface of the part (or outer surface of the base cylinder) and use the option

'Copy the selected face' form 'Solid Edit' toolbar (Figure 2.17 (a))

2. Select the copied surface and add it to another level for example Level 2 (Figure 2.17 (b))

3. Change the height of the surface so that it becomes longer then the part. This can be done by

using the Scale option in the 'Modelling Mode' toolbar (here remember to lock the x and y

dimensions so that they do not get scaled) (Figure 2.18 (a))


2-15

4. Select the surface and use the offset option from the 'Modelling Mode' toolbar (remember to

change the offset direction to outward). In this option the distance of offset slices is equal to

the thickness of layer (1mm presently); number of copies can be calculated by measuring the

radial distance of the outer most point from the first surface divided by the thickness. (Figure

2.18 (b))

5. Find the intersecting curve between all the conformal slices and the part, it can be done by

selecting all the conformal slices with part and using the option 'Surface, Solid or Mesh

intersection' in 'Curve' toolbar. (Figure 2.19 (a))

6. Select each conformal slice with the intersecting curve with the option of boolean operation

and import it into PowerMILL to generate the toolpath (Figure 2.19 (b & c))

(a) (b)

Figure 2.17 (a) Selection of the base surface (b) Adding the selected layer into another level

(a) (b)

Figure 2.18 (a) Scaling the base surface (b) Copy of offset surfaces


2-16

(a)

(b) (c)

Figure 2.19 (a) Complete slicing of the part (b) Selected slice to intersect with the part (c) An

intermediate slice after intersection

After completing the slicing procedure in PowerSHAPE, each conformal slice imported in

PowerMILL one by one, to generate the toolpath for deposition. The steps for generating the

toolpath by current method are given in the following steps:

1. Calculate the bounding box of the current slice and increase its diameter by 1mm; create a

Ball end Mill tool.

2. Select the toolpath strategy called 'Surface Finishing', with two direction options U and V

(Figure 2.20 (a))


2-17

3. Toolpath generation after selecting proper parameters (Figure 2.20 (b))

4. The above three steps are repeated for all the conformal layers

(a)

(b)

Figure 2.20 (a) Strategy selection (b) Generate of tool path in a conformal slice


2-18

Many toolpath strategies have been explored in PowerMILL after option of pattern but still no

satisfactory method has yet been found. There are two option for toolpath generation, one in U

direction (horizontal direction Figure 2.20 (b)) and another in V direction vertical but there is no

combined strategy is there. In the selected strategy 94 lifts have been took place which is not

acceptable. If we find the combination of two strategy in U and V direction, then optimal toolpath

with less number of lifts can be generate.

Deposition of Upper Cylinder

After the deposition of the radial part the third part 'Upper Cylinder' is deposited on its top which

is sliced in the +Z direction and deposited by 3-Axis. Figure 2.21 shows the upper part on top of

radial part.

(a) (b)

Figure 2.21 (a) Upper cylinder on top of radial part (b) 3-Axis planar slice of the upper cylinder

Deposition of Lower Cylinder

It can be observed that the lower cylinder is not possible to deposit on lower face of radial part in

the current position. Hence to deposit the final fourth part the job has to be removed from the

fixture and the substrate and fixed upside down. But before changing the orientation of the job

from the current setting the finish machining should be done of the upper visible part on 5-Axis.

Then after changing the orientation the lower part should be deposited and finish machining

should be performed on lower part also.


2-19

2.4 Summary

In this Chapter various planar and non-planar slicing methods were explored, the conformal

slicing or feature based slicing was introduced. The feature based conformal AM can fabricate the

complex geometries without using any support mechanism, the capability was proved by taking

an example of complex IC-7 housing part.

Chapter 3

Integral Substrate Method

3.1 Introduction

Several deposition methods have been studied in the previous chapter. In all of them the deposition

has been started from some base metal plate which has been removed by face milling after

deposition. It has been seen that if we use integral substrate which become part of the deposited

component then it increases strength of the part as the forged/rolled substrate is reinforced and it

can be worked as skeleton for the component. The same clamping setup can be used for machining

as well as deposition so, the final component can be produce without changing the clamping

arrangement. Also the substrate can be use with best engagement in the component, so the

efficiency can be increase by using less material. In this chapter a new integral substrate method

has been explain by an example of turbine blade.

3.2 Methodology

In HLM process the basic steps are as import the CAD model in CAM package, slicing of the CAD

model in Gati-Nirman, generate tool path for each layer and deposit each layer. Here in integral

substrate method few steps have been changed which discussed in detail as below.

3.2.1 Maximum consumable volume of substrate

The CAD model of turbine blade is shown in Figure 3.1(a). After import the CAD model, the

suitable integral substrate has been selected of particular size and shape which is shown in Figure

3.1(b) which is placed at the centre of component. Now, for maximum use of the substrate in the

final component it has been required to find the maximum engagement of the substrate with the

component.

The maximum engagement of the substrate with the component has been found by sliding it

along the component. Here, the work plane of the substrate has been changed by 1 mm in both

direction. Then, volume occupied by the substrate of the component has been found by boolean

operation. Table 3.1 shows the volume of the component covered by substrate at different level.

Chapter 3 Integral Substrate Method

3-2

Here (+ve) layer position describes above the centre level and (-ve) layer position describes below

the centre level.

(a)

(b)

Figure: 3.1 (a) CAD model of the turbine blade, (b) The integral substrate at centre of component

Table: 3.1 Volume of the component covered by the substrate at different level

Substrate Layer Position Volume

-5 3.296618

-4 3.515716

-3 3.674435

-2 3.777121

-1 3.814848

0 3.802898

1 3.743719

2 3.657091

3 3.52497

4 3.366994

5 3.310502


3-3

Figure 3.2 shows the graph for volume of component occupied by substrate and different level.

It has been seen from the graph that at (-1) level, maximum volume is occupied. So we have placed

the substrate at (-1) level as shown in Figure 3.3(a) and Figure 3.3(b) shows the part of component

covered by substrate

Figure: 3.2 Best position finding

(a) (b)

Figure: 3.3 (a) Best position of the substrate with work piece at z=-1 (b) Volume of component

covered by substrate

Position of substrate from center

Vo

lum

e o

ccu

pie

d b

y s

ub

stra

te x

10

4


3-4

3.2.2 Slicing and near net CAD model

The slicing of the component has been done in Gati-Nirman as shown in Figure 3.4(a). The

unnecessary slices of the component covered by the substrate has been removed because it is not

required to form slices on the substrate as shown in Figure 3.4(b). Now one can observe that there

are two groups of slices, one is on the upper face of the substrate and another is under the lower

face of the substrate. Hence it is required to change the build direction of the slices in the lower

group before generating the toolpath. Therefore, the slices which are in upper group require + Z

build direction and the slices which are in lower group require Z build direction.

(a)

(b)

Figure: 3.4 (a) Sliced component by Gati-Nirman (b) Sliced component with substrate

(substrate slices are removed)

After removing the unnecessary slices (33 slices are remaining), the contours are generated by

intersection of the slices with component as shown in Figure 3.5(a). These contours are then

extruded by the required layer thickness (1mm in this case) in their build directions. Stacking all

these sub volumes together, a near net CAD model can be obtained as shown in Figure 3.5(b). This

CAD model can be used to calculate the deposited volume of the component which is explained in

section to analyse the material efficiency.


3-5

(a) (b)

Figure: 3.5 (a) Contours on each Slice of the component from both face of the substrate (b)

Extruded volume of the contours on each slice (near net CAD model)

3.2.3 Toolpath generation

The toolpath for each layers has been created in Gati-Nirman. Figure 3.6 shows toolpath for entire

component. Here, the contour parallel strategy has been used.

Figure: 3.6 Toolpath generation for entire component by Gati-Nirman

The number of contours produced for every layer are different. The first layer of the upper

group of slices contains only one contour whereas the eighth layer contains four contours as shown

in Figure 3.7 (a, b) and Figure 3.7 (c, d) shows the extruded contours by the required layer thickness

(1mm in this case) in their build directions.


3-6

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure: 3.7 Contour parallel toolpath (a) 1st layer with 1 contour (b) 8th layer with 4 contour (c)

1st extruded volume (d) 8th extruded volume

3.3 Implementation Details in a CAM Package

Here we used DelCAM but the generally the steps are same for any CAM package. There are

some differences in DelCAM steps which shows below.

CAD model has been imported in .psmodel format then suitable integral substrate was

selected.

The workplane of substrate was sifted by 1 mm in both direction from centre and intersected

volume of substrate and component has been calculated by solid[name].volume command

until the maximum fit has been found.

Slicing has been done in Gati-Nirman and the unnecessary slices were deleted.

Each slices have been moved to different windows in PowerMILL and toolpath for all slices

has been produced which gave the NC codes.


3-7

The generalized steps for any CAM package is shown in the form of flowchart in Figure 3.8.

Start

Import CAD model of the component in suitable format

Select the suitable integral substrate

Find the position of the substrate within the component with best fit

Input parameters such as layer thickness (t), machining allowance (m), stepover (s) and torch speed (v)

Slicing of the component (Gati-Nirman)

Change the build direction of desired slices & remove the unnecessary slices

Extrude each slice by 1 mm in desired build direction

Calculate the deposited volume of on each slice and find total near net volume

Generate toolpath for deposition of each slice

Generate the NC codes for deposition and milling for each slice

End

Figure: 3.8 Flow chart for generalized CAM package implementation

Optional


3-8

3.4 Result Analysis

Turbine blades are generally manufactured by conventional subtractive processes, in which the

machining start from the bounding box. The volume of the bounding box for the blade is shown in

Figure 3.9 which has been calculated using the Delcams PowerMILL module.

Figure: 3.9 Bounding box calculation for subtractive process

The calculated bounding box volume is:

= 50 70 250 = 875000 3

The volume of the component which is measured from the CAD model is :

= 154089.79 3

So, the wastage in the subtractive process is:

= 875000 154089.79

= 720910.03 3 82.38 %

The dimension of the integral substrate used for this method is shown in Figure 3.10.


3-9

Figure: 3.10 Central consumable substrate

Now, the volume of the integral substrate is,

= 5 70 250 = 87500 3

Table 3.2 shows the volumes of each layers which has been required to deposite. Each layer

has different number of contours which are specified by different volumes. The total volume used

by this integral substance AM method is also calculated.

Table: 3.2 Extruded volume of each layer

Layer No. Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3 Volume 4 Total

Volume

1 263 263

2 776.63 776.63

3 776.56 776.56

4 776.5 776.5

5 764.4 764.4

6 786.4 1438.2 2224.6

7 807 2462 3269

8 864.51 3761.6 4626.11

9 998.73 3769.66 4768.39

10 1078.7 3787.62 4866.32

11 1638.15 3824.96 5463.11

12 2067.29 3882.2 5949.49

13 6580.73 6580.73

14 7060.25 7060.25

70

250

5


3-10

15 7413.23 7413.23

16 7712.84 7712.84

17 7974.25 7974.25

18

Integrated Substrate 19

20

21

22 8152.98 8152.98

23 7863.8 7863.8

24 7429.89 7429.89

25 6784.19 6784.19

26 4804.63 1381.19 6185.82

27 4548.97 1226.93 5775.9

28 4336.06 333.22 776.05 5445.33

29 3770.12 384.69 180.3 776.08 5111.19

30 3760.67 218.27 776.1 4755.04

31 2357.91 776.5 776.14 3910.55

32 1396.8 776.17 2172.97

33 776.21 776.21

34 776.25 776.25

35 776.3 776.3

36 776.35 776.35

37 194.68 194.68

Deposited Volume 138152.9

Substrate Volume 87500

Total 225652.9

As we know total volume used in subtractive process is,

= 875000 3

= 154089.79 3

The wastage in the integral substrate method is:

= 225652.9 154089.79

= 71563.11 3 31.71 %

So, the save in material by the method compare to subtractive process is,

=720910.03 71563.11

720910.03

= 90.07 %


3-11

Efficiency of the integral substrate AM method,

= 68.29 %

Figure 3.11 shows the deposited turbine blade by the integral substrate method.

Figure: 3.11 Deposited layers of turbine blade by integral substrate method

3.5 Summary

In this chapter a new integral substrate method was described in detail with the algorithm to find

best fit of the substance. Comparison of the conventional subtractive process and this new AM

process was also discussed for the example of turbine blade. The efficiency of this process was

68.29 % and wastage was 31.71 % calculated.

Chapter 4

An Integrated Multi-Station HLM

4.1 Introduction

This chapter describes the requirement to develop an integrated multi-station multi-axis Hybrid

Layered Manufacturing facility for producing exotic metallic components through an optimal

combination of MIG and TIG (PAW) deposition. Which can be help to build simple monolithic

objects out of Fe, Al, Ni and Ti alloys, characterize them and fine-tune th

ankit final report

Documents

ANKIT Final Dissertation

A Project Report Ankit Patel

Ankit project report final

Report on oltc by Ankit

ANKIT a Synopsis Report

Ankit Energy Audit Report

ankit final report(ankit)HIET1.doc

Ankit mr report

Ankit SIP Report for Indian Oil

Ankit Final Sip Report-2 (1).docx

Ankit Jaiswal Final

33394625 FINAL Project of Stock Market Ankit

Ankit Report

Research Internship Thesis - Final Report - Ankit Kukreja

Nitish Kumar Kumar Ankit (B.Tech Final year) SCE DEHRADUN … · 2018-01-17 · Nitish Kumar Kumar Ankit (B.Tech Final year) SCE DEHRADUN Astt Prof. Ashish Pathani ... International

Final Rep-Ankit Baghel

Hp ISS report 2010 Ankit Singh Bhandari

Final Ankit

Ankit Interim Report

MRP Ankit Kanugo Updated 14-9-11 Final

Sparse Matrix Vector Multiply Algorithms and Optimizations on Modern Architectures Ankit Jain, Vasily Volkov CS252 Final Presentation 5/9/2007 ankit@eecs.berkeley.edu

Thermal Report Ankit

UK Country Report Ankit

FINAL REPORT Team 1, Section 001umich.edu/~desci501/2010/Team01/APD2010_team01_FINALREPORT.pdfFINAL REPORT . Team 1, Section 001 . Ankit Dhingra: ... It’s a sunny, ... Spain is 36,739,712

31 Ankit Report of Samsung

Ankit Working Capital Project Report

Ankit Poddar Final Project Report

Airtel Ankit Proj Final

E.E D.l.W training report BY Ankit Kumar EN 2 year

FINAL Project of Stock Market (Ankit)

Final Project .Doc Ankit

ANKIT final

Ankit Gupta Training Report

Final Assignment- Sheridan College Showcase Loungetrantor.sheridanc.on.ca/student/shaankit/Images/Final Project.pdf · Final Assignment- Sheridan College Showcase Lounge By- Ankit

Ankit- NTPC Training Report