annex 3 01

39
Measure 06 typ*: TM length: 5,4 km average traffic volume public transport on measure: 30000 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 38600 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 15000 persons per 24h TM - Tramway TB - comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years investment costs: 19,2 Mio. Person-km/year 347,2 Tsd. Person-h/year -1926,1 t/year 57,8 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no- realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. 4 difference between realization case and no realization case short description: Trolleybus The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. maintenance costs: total costs: Costs for additional need of tram waggons: Tramway line 4 * Types: Tramway track to Sykhiv from the existing end point stop vul. Mushaka vul. V. Stusa, Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny to Sykhiv 137,5 Mio. UAH 7 Mio. UAH 79,7 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 1/13

Upload: investinlviv

Post on 22-Jul-2015

63 views

Category:

Investor Relations


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Annex 3 01

Measure 06

typ*:TM

length:5,4 km

average traffic volumepublic transport

on measure:30000 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volumepublic transport

on measure:38600 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volumepublic transport

on measure:15000 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

investment costs:

19,2 Mio. Person-km/year

347,2 Tsd. Person-h/year

-1926,1 t/year

57,8 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. 4

difference between realization case and norealization case

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

maintenance costs:

total costs:

Costs for additional needof tram waggons:

Tramway line 4

* Types:

Tramway track to Sykhiv from the existing end point stop vul. Mushaka vul. V. Stusa, Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny to Sykhiv

137,5 Mio. UAH

7 Mio. UAH

79,7 Mio. UAH

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 1/13

Page 2: Annex 3 01

Measure 07

typ*:TM

length:3.2 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:15600 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:15600 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:15600 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

Tramway line 4

* Types:

Tramway track: Sykhiv, vul. Vernadskoho, Bus terminal vul. Stryyska

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

49.1 Mio. UAH

6

difference between realization case and norealization case

8.8 Mio. Person-km/year

73.8 Tsd. Person-h/year

-889.4 t/year

21.6 Mio. UAH

70.7 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need

of tram waggons: 3 Mio. UAH

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 2/13

Page 3: Annex 3 01

Measure 08

typ*:TM

length:3.2 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:12700 persons per 24h

(Line 3)9800 persons per 24h

(Line 5)

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:12700 persons per 24h

(Line 3)9800 persons per 24h

(Line 5)

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:12700 persons per 24h

(Line 3)9800 persons per 24h

(Line 5)

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

3

difference between realization case and norealization case

589.8 Tsd. Person-h/year

-3342.9 t/year

33.3 Mio. Person-km/year

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

short description:

Trolleybus

Tramway line 3 and line 5

* Types:

Tramway track: Bus Terminal vul. Stryyska to vul. Knyahyny Olhy

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

40.8 Mio. UAH

18.4 Mio. UAH

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need

of tram waggons:

59.2 Mio. UAH

6 Mio. UAH

investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 3/13

Page 4: Annex 3 01

Measure 09

typ*:TM

length:6.9 km 6.3 km

(Line 2) (Line 6)

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:15900 persons per 24h

(Line 2)9200 persons per 24h

(Line 6)

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:27300 persons per 24h

(Line 2)9600 persons per 24h

(Line 6)

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:2900 persons per 24h

(Line 2)400 persons per 24h

(Line 6)

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

difference between realization case and norealization case

16.7 Mio. Person-km/year

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

Tramway line 2 and line 6

* Types:

Reconstruction of Tramway Line 2 and 6 (EBRD)

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

Trolleybus

12 Mio. UAH

120.0 Mio. UAH

251.2 Tsd. Person-h/year

-1675.2 t/year

141.3 Mio. UAH

261.3 Mio. UAH

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

11

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need

of tram waggons:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 4/13

Page 5: Annex 3 01

Measure 10

typ*:TM

length:6.9 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:15900 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:27300 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:2900 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs:

3.5 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 12

* Types:

49.1 Mio. UAH

Extension Line 12: to vul. Shevchenka

105.7 Tsd. Person-h/year

-453.7 t/year

Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:

difference between realization case and norealization case

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus

investment costs include costs for construction of new road

4.5 Mio. Person-km/year

59.3 Mio. UAH

10

10.2 Mio. UAH

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 5/13

Page 6: Annex 3 01

Measure 11

typ*:TM

length:3.4 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:5900 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:6900 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:5200 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs: 23.1 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

difference between realization case and norealization case

4.7 Mio. Person-km/year

99.4 Tsd. Person-h/year

-470.4 t/year

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional

need of trolleybusses:

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

35.8 Mio. UAH

10.5 Mio. UAH

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

Trolleybus line 24

* Types:

12.7 Mio. UAH

Extension of Line 24: Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny, vul. Khutorivka to vul. Stryyska

The line 24 in the model goes alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14). In case the measure 11 will not be realised it was assumed that all trips go to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14).

investment costs:

5

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 6/13

Page 7: Annex 3 01

Measure 12

typ*:TM

length:4.3 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:2700 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:5100 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:1000 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs:

17.5 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 24

* Types:

16.0 Mio. UAH

Extension Line 11/24: vul. Dzh. Vashyngtona, vul. Pasichna, Mayorivka, vul. Medovoy Pechery

The measure 12 was added to the model as independent sub-line of the trolleybus line 24 from vul. Zelena to the end ofvul. Medovoy Pechery

19.2 Tsd. Person-h/year

-105.4 t/year

Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:

difference between realization case and norealization case

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

1.0 Mio. Person-km/year

45.3 Mio. UAH

13

29.2 Mio. UAH

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 7/13

Page 8: Annex 3 01

Measure 13

typ*:TM

length:1.0 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:7200 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:8700 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:5400 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

difference between realization case and norealization case

1.2 Mio. Person-km/year

18.6 Tsd. Person-h/year

-120.2 t/year

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional

need of trolleybusses:

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

12.6 Mio. UAH

8

3.5 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 24

* Types:

4.5 Mio. UAH

Extension of Trolley bus line 24 for 1 Kilometer from cinema in Zone „Santa Barbara“

The measure 13 was added to model as blind line within the trolleybus line.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 8/13

Page 9: Annex 3 01

Measure 14

typ*:TM

length:3.3 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:1400 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:2000 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:1000 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs: 22.4 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

difference between realization case and norealization case

3.2 Mio. Person-km/year

73.4 Tsd. Person-h/year

-320.5 t/year

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional

need of trolleybusses:

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

34.7 Mio. UAH

9

10.5 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 24

* Types:

12.3 Mio. UAH

Construction of 2.5 km new Trolley bus line from cinema to the existing line on vul. Karbyshev over Sykhiv Bridge for passenger transport from Sykhiv - Novyy Lviv, connection of two highly passenger frequented parts of the city Sykhiv und Novyy Lviv and shortest Line from Sykhiv in the city centre (Pl. Petrushevycha) over vul. Stusa

The trolleybus line 1 is out of order because of the realised tram line 4. The line 24 in the model goes from the cinema alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14).In case the measure 14 is not realised, it was assumed that all trips gotovul. Stryyska (measure 11).

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 9/13

Page 10: Annex 3 01

Measure 16

typ*:TM

length:5.0 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:3100 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:7200 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:900 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs:

7.0 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 2

* Types:

14.9 Mio. UAH

Extension Line 2 to vul. Trolleybusna (circle line in 2 directions: Kulparkivska-Naukova-Trolleybusna, V.Velykoho) - chance to create new lines to connect Sykhiv)

101.6 Tsd. Person-h/year

-434.8 t/year

Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:

difference between realization case and norealization case

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus

4.3 Mio. Person-km/year

42.1 Mio. UAH

7

27.2 Mio. UAH

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 10/13

Page 11: Annex 3 01

Measure 17

typ*:TM

length:1.2 km (8.2 km)shifting (whole line)

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:11000 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:18000 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:3100 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

difference between realization case and norealization case

7.2 Mio. Person-km/year

169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year

-725.5 t/year

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional

need of trolleybusses:

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

12.6 Mio. UAH

1

14.0 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 3

* Types:

4.5 Mio. UAH

Shifting of one line (one direction) from vul. Stryyska to vul. Trolleybusna over vul. V. Velykoho - increase of traffic flows by the double line on vul. Rubachka

Measure 17 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were calculated together with measure 18.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 11/13

Page 12: Annex 3 01

Measure 18

typ*:TM

length:1.2 km (8.2 km)shifting (whole line)

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:11000 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:18000 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:3100 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs:

0.0 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 3

* Types:

4.5 Mio. UAH

Analogue (Measure 17) shifting of the Line in one direction from vul. Trolleybusna to vul. Stryyska over Naukova (right turn is no bar for the other traffic) Line can be an important Trolley bus connection to Bus Terminal and Stadion

Measure 18 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were calculated together with measure 17.

169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year

-725.5 t/year

Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:

difference between realization case and norealization case

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road

total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus

7.2 Mio. Person-km/year

12.6 Mio. UAH

2

8.2 Mio. UAH

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 12/13

Page 13: Annex 3 01

Measure 19

typ*:TM

length:2.0 km

average traffic volume public transport

on measure:1900 persons per 24h

maximum traffic volume public transport

on measure:1900 persons per 24h

minimum traffic volume public transport

on measure:1900 persons per 24h

TM - TramwayTB -

comment:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

maintenance costs: 13.6 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

difference between realization case and norealization case

2.8 Mio. Person-km/year

59.9 Tsd. Person-h/year

-279.5 t/year

investment costs include costs for construction of new road

estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional

need of trolleybusses:

short description:

Trolleybus

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.

73.1 Mio. UAH

12

3.5 Mio. UAH

Trolleybus line 5

* Types:

59.5 Mio. UAH

Future close connection of the Bus terminal to the Stadion by trolley bus

investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

total costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 13/13

Page 14: Annex 3 01

Measure 01

typ*:A

lanes:

length:

tunnel/bridges:

average traffic volume on measure:

maximum traffic volume on measure:

minimum traffic volume on measure:

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

investment costs:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

total costs:

difference between realization case and no realization case

costs:

Completion of the road circle

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

traffic performance:

short description:

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

time in traffic:

Completion of the road circle

national measure not included in urban budget

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 1/26

Page 15: Annex 3 01

Measure 02

typ*:A

lanes:

length:

tunnel/bridges:

average traffic volume on measure:

maximum traffic volume on measure:

minimum traffic volume on measure:

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes

* Types:

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes

national measure not included in urban budget

time in traffic:

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

Motorway/ highway

traffic performance:

difference between realization case and no realization case

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

total costs:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 2/26

Page 16: Annex 3 01

Measure 03

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:10 km

tunnel/bridges:yes / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

42300 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

58500 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

32300 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

Construction of a main road near city centre, which will carry all traffic flows through the city centre in north-south direction (cp. current master plan)Course: from exit to Kiev, vul. Khmelnytskoho, over railway line Lviv-Krasne, over High Castle, with tunneled sections, new section alongside Shevchenkivskyy Gay, crossing vul. Lychakivska, Zelena, Stusa, along vul. Ivana Franka and vul. Stryyska to the exit to Stryy

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

difference between realization case and no realization case

-21 Mio. Veh-km/year

-2038 Tsd. Veh-h/year

234.8 Mio. UAH

6

- 5871 t/year

1399 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

total costs:

investment costs:

Chorda - Axis

1633.8 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 3/26

Page 17: Annex 3 01

Measure 04

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:20 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

36600 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

58300 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

16700 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Small inner circle

- 8221 t/year

1167.5 Mio. UAH

* Types:

4

difference between realization case and no realization case

total costs: 1395.7 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

-27 Mio. Veh-km/year

-4828 Tsd. Veh-h/year

228.2 Mio. UAH

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

Motorway/ highway

The inner circle is planned to proceed from the industrial centre Sykhiv, alongside the railway line Lviv-Khodoriv at vul. Luhanska, crossing the railway line Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, vul. Syayvo, Levandivska, Yeroshenka, Lypynskoho, through the northern industrial zone, crossing the railway line Lviv-Krasne, vul. Bogdanivska (planned) through the south-eastern industrial zone, vul. Pasychna, to the industrial centre Sykhiv

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 4/26

Page 18: Annex 3 01

Measure 05

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:27 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

33100 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

46500 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

18400 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 1631.7 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-6985 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Route: from Sykhiv industrial zone, vul Khutorivka, Naukova, Ryashivska, crossing of vul. Horodotska and railway lines Lviv-Stryy and Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, new main road Roksolyani (planned), near residential area Ryasne, through forest park zone, to the northern residential area Zboyska and to the exit towards Kiev

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

259.2 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Peripheral semi-circle

- 20553 t/year

1372.5 Mio. UAH

3

difference between realization case and no realization case

-79 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 5/26

Page 19: Annex 3 01

Measure 06

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:8.5 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

24500 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

32800 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

11100 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

67 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Exit Ternopil

- 666 t/year

335 Mio. UAH

9

difference between realization case and no realization case

-3 Mio. Veh-km/year

-425 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Exit Ternopil - from band main road alongside Glynyanskyy Trakt to the circle bypass

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 422 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 6/26

Page 20: Annex 3 01

Measure 07

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:6.5 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

25500 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

49100 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

20400 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 354.1 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-203 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Exit Ivano-Frankivsk - from the circle connection and peripheral semi-circle to Sykhiv alongside vul. Zelena to the circle bypass

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

59.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Exit Ivano-Frankivsk

-112 t/year

295 Mio. UAH

14

difference between realization case and no realization case

-0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 7/26

Page 21: Annex 3 01

Measure 08

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:6.8 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

15800 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

18900 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

6800 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

54.9 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Exit Zhovkva

27 t/year

289 Mio. UAH

22

difference between realization case and no realization case

0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year

-274 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Exit Zhovkva - from band main road to the northern bypass motorway

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 343.9 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 8/26

Page 22: Annex 3 01

Measure 09

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:6.2 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

28700 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

57600 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

5200 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 340.1 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-203 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Exit Horodok - from inner circle at vul. Horodotska to Konopnyca

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

58.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Exit Horodok

-376 t/year

282 Mio. UAH

11

difference between realization case and no realization case

-1 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 9/26

Page 23: Annex 3 01

Measure 10

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:8.8 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

20400 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

34300 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

12300 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

86.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Exit Yavoriv

-235 t/year

408 Mio. UAH

13

difference between realization case and no realization case

-1 Mio. Veh-km/year

-231 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Exit Yavoriv - from inner circle at vul. Shevchenka through Ryasne industrial zone to the peripheral circle

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 494.1 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 10/26

Page 24: Annex 3 01

Measure 11

typ*:B

lanes:4

length:4 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

12300 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

14700 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

6500 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 249.4 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-204 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Road construction Vernadskyy Prospekt, 3.2 km length

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

39.9 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Road construction Vernadskyy prospekt

-45 t/year

209.5 Mio. UAH

15

difference between realization case and no realization case

-0.4 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 11/26

Page 25: Annex 3 01

Measure 12

typ*:B

lanes:

length:

tunnel/bridges:no / no

total traffic volumeheading to the node:

84500 Veh/24h

cross sectionwith highest trafficvolume at the node

45200 Veh/24h

cross sectionwith least traffic

volume at the node39000 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

3.6 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

15 Mio. UAH

17

short description:

total costs: 18.6 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

Crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova

* Types:

65 t/year

difference between realization case and no realization case

0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year

-124 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Complete extension of crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova (multilevel solution)

Motorway/ highway

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 12/26

Page 26: Annex 3 01

Measure 16

typ*:C

lanes:4

length:4.5 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

9200 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

9700 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

8400 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

40.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

New main roads in western residential/ industrial areas

-964 t/year

199.5 Mio. UAH

5

difference between realization case and no realization case

-4 Mio. Veh-km/year

-394 Tsd. Veh-h/year

New main roads in the western residential and industrial areas with connection to the motorway Lviv-Mostyska-frontier

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 239.6Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 13/26

Page 27: Annex 3 01

Measure 17

typ*:C

lanes:4

length:2.8 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

16500 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

18900 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

15700 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 142.9Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-260 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Vul. Kulparkivska and Knyahyni Olhy - connection of central urban districts with southern residential areas and Sokilnyky

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

23.4 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Connection of city with southern districts

-178 t/year

119.5 Mio. UAH

10

difference between realization case and no realization case

-0.6 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 14/26

Page 28: Annex 3 01

Measure 18

typ*:D

lanes:2

length:3.8 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

11000 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

20800 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

2000 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

33.5 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Traffic improvement between vul. Zelena/ vul. Sakharova

622 t/year

131.3 Mio. UAH

16

difference between realization case and no realization case

2 Mio. Veh-km/year

28 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Traffic improvement on the section between vul. Zelena and vul. Sakharova (vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Sarytskykh, Vitovskoho, Kopernyka). Planning of one-way-streets at vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Zarytskykh, SaksahanskohoPlanning of reconstruction of vul. Voloska - road extension near Stryyskyy-market to 3 lanes with organisation of one-way-streets and extension of vul. Rustaveli near vul. ArchypenkaReorganisation of bus- and electric public transport

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 164.8 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 15/26

Page 29: Annex 3 01

Measure 19

typ*:D

lanes:2

length:1.1 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

6000 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

15200 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

1500 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 56.1 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-19 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha, at vul. Saksahanskoho and Zelena incl. establishment of one-way-streets and access from vul. Saksahanskoho to Pl. Petrushevycha via vul. Kostomarova (extended by partial demolition of buildings) and traffic light controlled crossings - relief of crossing vul. Zelena – vul. FrankaThe basic traffic scheme provides the establishment of a one-way-street and the effective utilisation of vul. Sarytskykh: Planning of an access to this street from vul. Vitovskoho (left corner of the park, in front of park entrance). inspection of th variant of continuation of vul. Sarytskykh towards vul. Bohuna (perspective 2012-2015).

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

12.5 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha

97 t/year

43.6 Mio. UAH

20

difference between realization case and no realization case

0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 16/26

Page 30: Annex 3 01

Measure 20

typ*:D

lanes:2

length:2 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

8000 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

12200 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

3100 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

19.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Reconstruktion of sections in north-eastern city centre

74 t/year

72 Mio. UAH

21

difference between realization case and no realization case

0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year

27 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Reconstruction of several sections to improve traffic flows in the north-eastern city centre: alongside Lychakivska, Halytskyy place, Prospekt Svoboda and vul. Pidvalna by planned intensified utilisation of the streets Sankovetska, Lysenka, Vynnychenkarequired reconstruction of parts of vul. Lysenka (executed), opening of a small part of vul. Vynnychenka (approx. 70 m), to secure the left-hand exit to vul. Kryvonosa and the ascension to vul. Honta by circumnavigatingperspectively: partial reconstruction of Vynnychenka, to redirect traffic flows from vul. Franka to Honta through Vynnychenka which will relieve Pidvalna. demolition of a salient quoin at vul. Honta to increase the passage capacity

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 91.1 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 17/26

Page 31: Annex 3 01

Measure 21

typ*:D

lanes:3

length:1.4 km

tunnel/bridges:no / yes

average traffic volume on measure:

13300 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

16000 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

10900 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 74.9 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

22 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Radical relief of the city centre from transit traffic on Lychakivska, Mayorivka, Zelena by construction of a 3-lane road as a connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho near Znesinnya park - redirection of traffic flows on vul. Korduba and tunnel entrance to Promyslova and Khmelnytskoho, through Saklynskykh to Kovelska and Polova to the northern district of the city

The 3-laned road construction measure goes via Chorda - Axis (measure 3), for measure 21 only the drives to the Chorda - Axis were modelled as measure.

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

14.2 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

3-lane road connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho

154 t/year

60.7 Mio. UAH

19

difference between realization case and no realization case

0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 18/26

Page 32: Annex 3 01

Measure 22

typ*:D

lanes:2

length:1.2 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

8100 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

10500 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

6200 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

13.0 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Abscission of the corner on crossing Pstrak/ Kleparivska

-53 t/year

46.2 Mio. UAH

12

difference between realization case and no realization case

-0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year

3 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Abscission of the sharp corner at the green area on the street crossing Pstrak and Kleparivska, to allow for an active traffic flow from Horodocka via J.Mudroho to Kleparivska and onto north, radical reconstruction of vul. Y Mudroho (currently under construction)

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 59.2 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 19/26

Page 33: Annex 3 01

Measure 23

typ*:D

lanes:2

length:0.5 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

7500 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

11000 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

4900 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 34.0 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-133 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Reconstruction vul. Chuprynky (partly executed) and Melnyka to intensify traffic flows from Horbachevskoho to Antonovycha for relief of vul. Sakharova and Kopernyka as well as the city centreTraffic from Antonovycha via vul. Bandery, Nevskoho and Ozarkevycha will be directed via Horodotska and Y.Mudroho-Pstraka-Kleparivska to the north of the city.

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

8.5 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Reconstruction Chuprynky and Melnyka

75 t/year

25.5 Mio. UAH

18

difference between realization case and no realization case

0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 20/26

Page 34: Annex 3 01

Measure 24

typ*:D

lanes:3

length:1 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

14200 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

15700 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

8700 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

12.0 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka

-117 t/year

45.5 Mio. UAH

8

difference between realization case and no realization case

-0.5 Mio. Veh-km/year

-46 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka (Kopernyka-Verbytskoho, Kopernyka-Bandery, Kopernyka-Stefanyka) to improve the situation on vul. Sakharova and Vitovskoho towards city centre at the expense of the pavement

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 57.5 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 21/26

Page 35: Annex 3 01

Measure 25

typ*:D

lanes:3

length:0.4 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

13600 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

14100 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

13200 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs: 23.0 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

-59 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Start of the construction of a 3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho through the green area in front of Franko memorial (relocation of the stopping points at university to secure the construction of the south-western circle aroung the city centre and the relief of vul. Sichovykh Striltsiv.

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

4.8 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho

0.2 t/year

18.2 Mio. UAH

23

difference between realization case and no realization case

-0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 22/26

Page 36: Annex 3 01

Measure 26

typ*:D

lanes:2

length:0.3 km

tunnel/bridges:no / no

average traffic volume on measure:

15100 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

16600 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

10800 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

1.4 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Finalisation 1st phase connection Zaliznychna/ Lutskoho

-222 t/year

7,8 Mio. UAH

1

difference between realization case and no realization case

-1 Mio. Veh-km/year

-155 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Finalisation of 1st phase workings for the connection of Zaliznychna and Lutskoho for traffic flows from district Pryvokzalnyy to vul.Shevchenka and relief of Horodotska

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 9.2 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 23/26

Page 37: Annex 3 01

Measure 27

typ*:D

lanes:

length:

tunnel/bridges:no / no

total traffic volumeheading to the node:

42300 Veh/24h

cross sectionwith highest trafficvolume at the node

31000 Veh/24h

cross sectionwith least traffic

volume at the node8100 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

Roundabout at crossing prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom

* Types:

-244 t/year

difference between realization case and no realization case

-1 Mio. Veh-km/year

-81 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Construction of a roundabout instead of crossing Prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom and Kulisha

Motorway/ highway

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

1.7 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

9.9 Mio. UAH

2

short description:

total costs: 11.6 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 24/26

Page 38: Annex 3 01

Measure 28

typ*:D

lanes:

length:

tunnel/bridges:

average traffic volume on measure:

12700 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

16000 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

10200 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

total costs:

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

Organisational measures for the redirection of traffic flows and to activate car and bus traffic through vul. Dzherelna to relieve vul. Kulisha and Chornovola

traffic organisation only

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

Measures for redirection traffic vul. Kulisha/ Chornovola

difference between realization case and no realization case

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 25/26

Page 39: Annex 3 01

Measure 29

typ*:D

lanes:4

length:0.2 km

tunnel/bridges:yes / no

average traffic volume on measure:

15000 Veh/24h

maximum traffic volume on measure:

18000 Veh/24h

minimum traffic volume on measure:

12700 Veh/24h

A - B - Main road network with

moving traffic C - Road network of general

relevance with regulatedtraffic

D - Road and traffic organisation

comment:

tunnel construction under the tramway line

17.9 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years

maintenance costs:

-402 t/year

113 Mio. UAH

7

difference between realization case and no realization case

-2 Mio. Veh-km/year

-150 Tsd. Veh-h/year

Inspection of possibilities for tunnel construction under the tramway line on vul. Khmelnytskoho for activation of the street parallel to vul. Zamarstyniyska

The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change

short description:

* Types:Motorway/ highway

total costs: 130.9 Mio. UAH

The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.

benefit:

traffic performance:

time in traffic:

CO2 - emission:

ranking:

costs: investment costs:

© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 26/26