annual network operations report 2014 - eurocontrol · eurocontrol annex ii - acc annual network...

EUROCONTROL

Annex II - ACC

Annual NetworkOperations Report 2014

EUROCONTROL

Network Managernominated by the European Commission

Annual Network Operations Report – Annex II - ACC Page 1

1. INTRODUCTION The following annex provides a detailed analysis of ATC capacity evolution in 2014 for ACCs within the ECAC States for which data is available. The source of statistics is the NMOC unless otherwise indicated. The analysis covers:

• Traffic & Delay The chart and data table provide comprehensive information concerning the evolution of traffic and delay from 2010 to 2014 (where data is available). It includes the following values:

• Peak day traffic is the number of flight entries to the ACC on the peak day of each year. • Summer & Yearly Traffic is the daily average number of flight entries during the summer season (May to October inclusive) and

over the whole year (January to December). • Summer & Yearly En-route Delay is the average en-route delay per flight (including weather and special events e.g. industrial

action), attributed to the ACC during the summer season (May to October inclusive) and over the whole year (January to December).

• 2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan • Traffic Evolution gives the percentage difference between the total traffic (number of flight entries) in 2014 compared to 2013,

for the summer and the full year. • En-route Delay gives the number of minutes per flight of en-route delay attributed to all causes and also excluding delays

attributed to weather and special events. Values are provided for the summer and the full year. • ACC Reference value per ACC is the delay breakdown to achieve the European delay target of 0.5 min/flight for the full year, and

0.7 min/flight in the Summer season, as published in the NOP 2014-2018/19. • ACC Capacity Baseline – Offered: • ACCESS or Reverse CASA was used to measure the capacity actually offered by the ACC during the reference periods (2-15 June

2014, 7-20 July 2014). This is calculated from actual delay (Reverse CASA) or from projected delay (ACCESS). Projected delay is obtained by increasing the traffic and creating a regulation scheme for the studied ACC using traffic volume capacities and configuration data (sector opening schemes) provided by ANSPs.

• Capacity Plan (increase for Summer 2014) is the percentage value provided by ANSPs in the Network Operations Plan 2014-2018/19. This figure represents the ANSP commitment to increasing ACC capacity for Summer 2014, when compared to Summer 2013.

• Capacity enhancement: planned enablers • This information was taken from the local capacity plan in the Network Operations Plan 2014-2018/19. An indication is given as to

whether each measure was implemented as planned. • Summer 2014 Performance Assessment • This provides an analysis of the observed performance and of the achievement of the planned capacity increase. ACC

performance has been assessed by analysing traffic and delay statistics for each ACC and the evolution of the capacity baseline. Where relevant, other significant factors were also taken into account, such as industrial action or planned major events that resulted in a temporary reduction in capacity.

• Allocation of and reasons for En-route delay • The table lists the reference locations (sectors) causing most of the ACC delay, the number of minutes of en-route delay

attributed to each location and the percentage of the total ACC en-route delay. The graph shows the total ATFM en-route delay generated by each ACC, broken down into the 5 most significant reasons given for the delay in 2014 compared to 2013.

Note: The scale on all graphs varies from ACC to ACC - graphs should not be directly compared.


ALBANIA TIRANA ACC 1.

Traffic & Delay

2014 Realisation of Capacity Plan

The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 5% Achieved Comments ATS route network improvements No No requirements

Availability of new ATCOs (14 OJT in 2014) Yes Major part have finished successfully OJT

Standby and flexible shifts No No due to lack of staff. Planned 2015

Longer periods with 4 sectors open (3 + 1) if needed Yes But no requirements

Maximum configuration: 3/4 ENR + 1 APP sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65, the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 55 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 49.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Peak Day Traffic 831 880 926 984 959Summer Traffic 617 671 666 704 692Yearly Traffic 497 541 533 550 543Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LAAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Tirana LAAA ACC

Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) En-route Delay (min. per flight)

Capacity gap?

ACC Capacity Baseline (% difference v 2013)

Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference

Value Current Routes Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.8% B: 0.7 % L: -0.6%

-19% -1.2% 0.00 0.20

Summer -1.7% 0.00 0.27 No 65 (0%)


ARMENIA YEREVAN ACC 2.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Comments

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated with CAPAN at 40. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 12 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 9.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Summer Traffic 150 162 156 143 140Yearly Traffic 145 157 153 143 139Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

125

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

165

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

UDDDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Yerevan UDDD ACC


Capacity gap?



Value Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year H: 12.0% B: 9.4% L: 7.9%

No significant impact

-3.3% 0.00 0.06

Summer -2.5% 0.00 0.09 No 40 (+60%)


AUSTRIA VIENNA ACC 3.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.3 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 7 % Achieved Comments Enhanced sectorization according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Yes

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes

6 additional controllers Yes

Re-assessment of sector capacities according to CAPAN study Yes

Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels Yes

Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects Yes

Improved procedures with EDDM APP Yes DCTs H24/7 345+ in parallel ops with ATS routes Yes

Maximum configuration: 13 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 189, 6% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 178 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 165.

Allocation of and Reasons for En-route Delay


0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.4

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LOVVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

YearReference Location

Avg Daily ER Delays

% of Total ACC ER Delay

2014 LOVVSOU 13 24.9%2014 LOVVELUH 12 21.6%2014 LOVVSHT 8 14.4%2014 LOVVEAL1 4 7.1%2014 LOVVWB5T 3 5.9%2014 LOVVNCR 3 5.4%

0

50

100

150

200

250

CAPACITY STAFFING DISRUPTION EVENTS WEATHERAvg

daily

del

ay (m

in)

Vienna ACC en-route delays in 2014

Vienna LOVV ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.0% B: 0.3% L: -1.3%

+16% +7.3% 0.03 0.23

Summer +9.1% 0.04 0.24 No 189 (+6%)


AZERBAIJAN BAKU ACC 4.

Traffic & Delay

Data Source: STATFOR


The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments ATS route network optimisation - an on-going process in co-operation with neighboring States Yes

Building of new Baku ATC Center. Installation of new ATC system Final Phase Yes

Operations from new ATCC have been launched since March 01, 2014

Resectorisation of airspace structure Implementation Yes

Resectorisation has been implemented since March 06, 2014

Maximum configuration: 5 + 3APP Yes

New configuration has been implemented since March 06, 2014

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 32 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 18.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Summer Traffic 337 354 367 354 353Yearly Traffic 329 339 356 352 348Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Yearly enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

310

320

330

340

350

360

370

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

UBBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Baku UBBA ACC


Capacity gap?




Year H: 5.6% B: 3.8% L: 1.5%


-1.2% 0.00 0.23 Summer -0.2% 0.00 0.21 No 65 (+63%)


BELGIUM BRUSSELS ACC 5.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.13 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.03 minutes per flight in 2014.

Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Dynamic use of sector configurations Yes

Enhancement of ATFCM procedures Yes

Improved use of the route network as a result of FUA enhancement No

Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 125 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 111.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EBBUACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EBBUEEC 10 35.7%2014 EBBUNWC 6 21.0%2014 EBBUALL 5 17.9%2014 EBBUESC 3 10.9%2014 EBBUHLC 2 7.7%2014 EBBRTA 1 3.5%

0

20

40

60

80

100


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Brussels ACC en-route delays in 2014

Brussels EBBU ACC


Capacity gap?




Year H: 1.1% B: 0.8% L: -0.8%

-6% +2.9% 0.02 0.21

Summer +3.5% 0.03 0.29 No 131 (0%)


BULGARIA SOFIA ACC 6.

Traffic & Delay


Sofia LBSR ACC


Capacity gap?




Year H: 5.4% B: 3.5% L: 1.5%

-4% +24.8% 0.00 0.12

Summer +25.9% 0.00 0.18 No 172 (+15%)

The en-route delay per flight remained at zero during Summer 2014.

Planned capacity increase: sufficient capacity Achieved Comments ATS route network development and increase of maximum sector configurations available Yes

Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 10 sectors was sufficient

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 172. During the period June/July, the average peak 1 hour demand was 163 flights and the average peak 3 hour demand was 150 flights.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LBSRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


CROATIA ZAGREB ACC 7.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.14 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.49 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 43% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 39% for weather, 10% for ATC Equipment and 7% for ATC Staffing. Capacity plan: 1% Achieved Comments

10 additional ATCOs Yes

Optimization of manpower planning Yes

Enhanced ATFM techniques through cooperative traffic management Yes

Implementation of Mode S – DAP functionality (COOPANS) No Postponed to February 2015

Modernisation of ATM system with enhanced functionalities (SESAR compliant) Yes

Improved sector opening times Yes

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

Further cross-border FRA evolutions, optimisation of ATS route network Yes

Maximum configuration: 10/11 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 10 sectors

Summer 2014 performance assessment

The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 143. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 143, and the average peak 3 hour demand was 129.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LDZOACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LDZOULW 111 25.0%2014 LDZON 78 17.4%2014 LDZOTHW 58 13.1%2014 LDZOULA 48 10.7%2014 LDZOTHS 33 7.5%2014 LDZOTHN 29 6.6%

0

50

100

150

200

250


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Zagreb ACC en-route delays in 2014

Zagreb LDZO ACC


Capacity gap?




Year H: 2.6% B: 0.8% L: -0.8%

+6% +5.8% 0.33 0.21

Summer +6.5% 0.49 0.27 Yes 143 (+1%)


CYPRUS NICOSIA ACC 8.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 2.7 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 1.38 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 44% of delays were due to ATC capacity, 43% due to airspace management, and 9% due to ATC staffing. Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Continuous improvement of ATS route network Yes Through Blue Med & Ten-T FRA project

Implementation of TOPSKY (Sept 2013) Yes Finalised in February 2014

New ATC tools and new safety nets Yes TOP SKY C Tools

Improved ATFCM, including more flexibility in sector configuration openings Yes New sector configurations introduced and applied

Reduction of 4 sector opening hours due to reduction of overtime budget No Up to 5 sectors were opened

Improve Civil-Military cooperation in the South-East part of the FIR Yes Due to short notice given for activation/deactivation of D-areas, pre-tactical or tactical planning was not optimised. This was primarily due to the Israel-Gaza situation and the operation of RAF-LCRA

OLDI with Athens and Egypt No Done with Athens, November 2014

Benefits from CPR exchange with NM No Partly FSA completed. CPR is planned for early 2015 due to delay by NM (SITA)

Revision of sector capacities Yes Revised on 8 October 2014

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Up to 5 sectors were opened

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 55, 15% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 59 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 52.

Allocation of and Reasons for Enroute Delay


0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LCCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Nicosia LCCC ACC

Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013) Enroute Delay (min. per flight)

Capacity gap?




Year H: 11.1% B: 9.7% L: 7.5%


+9.8% 1.91 0.30 Summer +11.8% 1.38 0.29 Yes 55 (+15%)


CZECH REPUBLIC PRAGUE ACC 9.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.02 minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments

Improved flow and capacity management techniques, including STAM Yes

Adaptation of sector opening times depending on available staff Yes

Improved ATS route network – Stepped implementation of FRA Yes

Additional controllers No

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

Minor improvements of system functionalities Yes

New sectorisation (Autumn 2013) Yes Implemented in Oct 2013, adjusted in Spring 2014

Datalink No

Maximum configuration: 9/10 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS and was assessed to be at 162. The peak 1 hour demand was 159 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 146 flights.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LKAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LKAAM 8 35.7%2014 LKAANM 3 16.5%2014 LKAAL 3 12.4%2014 LKAANSHT 2 9.8%2014 LKAASM 1 5.4%2014 LKAAWM 1 4.4%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Prague ACC en-route delays in 2014

Prague LKAA ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.4% B: 0.0% L: -2.0%

-13% +2.5% 0.01 0.15

Summer +2.8% 0.02 0.25 No 162 (+1%)


DENMARK COPENHAGEN ACC 10.

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan 1 % Achieved Comments Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes

Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes

Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes

Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 8 sectors Yes

Minor updates of COOPANS Yes

Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3 (W) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 117 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 108.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EKDKACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Copenhagen EKDK ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.0% B: 0.4% L: -1.3%

+3% +0.3% 0.00 0.07

Summer -0.6% 0.00 0.12 No 125 (0%)


ESTONIA TALLINN ACC 11.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained at almost zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments New routes Yes

Adaptation of sector opening times Yes

Additional OLDI functions Yes

Maximum configuration: 2 (+1 FEEDER) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 63 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 53 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 47.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EETTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EETTFED 9 56.7%2014 EETTEST 5 28.7%2014 EETTWES 1 7.6%2014 EETTALL 1 6.5%2014 EETNTA 0 0.5% 0

5

10

15

20


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Tallinn ACC en-route delays in 2014

Tallinn EETT ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.7% B: 0.1% L: -1.2%


+4.7% 0.03 0.22 Summer +5.6% 0.05 0.30 No 63 (+2%)


EUROCONTROL MAASTRICHT ACC 12.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.25 minutes per flight in 2014. 51% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 30% for Weather, and 19% for Other. Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments Stepped implementation of MARS2 (including Dynamic Sectorisation) No Stopped

Traffic Management System (TMS) Level 2 No Renamed iFMP – planned for 2015

CPDLC monitoring concept & reduction in verbal coordination No

Improved ATFCM including STAM Yes

LUX High Implementation Yes

VDFL DECO Sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 20 sectors (Possible if required according to traffic levels) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 329. During the same period, the peak 3 hour demand was 335 and the peak 1 hour was 317.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EDYYUAC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EDYYB3EH 211 27.5%2014 EDYYB3WH 141 18.3%2014 EDYYBOLN 74 9.6%2014 EDYYD4WH 61 8.0%2014 EDYYB3WL 44 5.7%2014 EDYYB3LL 39 5.0%

0

100

200

300

400


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Maastricht UAC en-route delays in 2014

Maastricht EDYY UAC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.0% B: -0.1% L: -1.5%

+5% +2.4% 0.17 0.22

Summer +2.1% 0.25 0.24 No 329 (-2%)


FINLAND TAMPERE ACC 13.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Maintain number of controllers Yes

Maximum configuration: 6 + 3 feeders Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 40 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 33.



0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EFINCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EFINABCDEF 34 44.6%2014 EFINEFG 8 10.9%2014 EFINALL 8 10.3%2014 EFINGKLMN 7 0.0932014 EFINABCD 5 0.0672014 EFIN7AG 4 0.059

0

20

40

60

80


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Tampere ACC en-route delays in 2014

Tampere EFIN CTA


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.9% B: -0.6% L: -2.2%


+1.8% 0.16 0.16 Summer +3.0% 0.00 0.12 No 58 (0%)


FRANCE BORDEAUX ACC 14.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.5 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.3 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 34% of the delays were due to the reason Special Event, 24% due to ATC Capacity, 24% due to Industrial Action (ATC), 8% due to Equipment (ATC) and 9% due to Weather. Capacity Plan 0 % Achieved Comments Improved Airspace Management / FUA Yes

Staff deployment / Flexible rostering Yes

Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes

ESSO project study No Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface

Improvement of profiles for LFPO arrivals from the south-west (IBBP) – Dualisation of UN859 Yes

FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No

Maximum configuration: 21 UCESO Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 196 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 185.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LFBBALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LFBBP123 92 17.6%2014 LFBBRL12 77 14.6%2014 LFBBR4 56 10.7%2014 LFBBX4 46 8.7%2014 LFBBUSUD 39 7.4%2014 LFBBRL 29 5.4%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Bordeaux ACC en-route delays in 2014

Bordeaux LFBB ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.9% B: 0.7% L: -0.3%

+4% +2.0% 0.23 0.13

Summer +2.0% 0.34 0.20 No 201 (0%)


FRANCE BREST ACC 15.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay increased from 0.5 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.6 minutes per flight over the same period in 2014. 52% of the delays were due to the reason Industrial Action (ATC), and 42% due to ATC Capacity. Capacity Plan 2 % Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes

Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes

Improvement of ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes

DFL change in V, W and K sectors Yes

Change to G and A sectors limits Yes Improvement of profiles for LFPO arrivals from the south-west (IBBP) – Dualisation of UN859 Yes

IBP project - New interface between France & UK No

FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No

Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO No Maximum configuration: 17 UCESO Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 209, 1% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 221 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 207.



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LFRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LFRREST 159 11.7%2014 LFRRMZU 136 10.0%2014 LFRRMZS 95 7.0%2014 LFRRN 93 6.9%2014 LFRRNU 81 5.9%2014 LFRRNGA 79 5.8%

0

200

400

600

800


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Brest ACC en-route delays in 2014

Brest LFRR ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.4% B: 2.2% L: 0.9%

No sig. impact

+4.2% 0.53 0.08 Summer +4.6% 0.63 0.11 Yes 209 (+1%)


FRANCE MARSEILLE ACC 16.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay increased from 0.7 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.9 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 48% of the delays were due to the reason Industrial Action (ATC), 32% due to ATC Capacity, 8% due to Equipment (ATC), 6% due to Weather and 4% due to ATC Staffing. Capacity Plan 3% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes Improved ATFM procedures and STAM Yes

Reorganisation of interface with LECB (LUMAS) Phase 2 Partially

Improved airspace availability around D54 during 15 June – 15 Sept period Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface

Reorganisation of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145 No New upper level of sectors ML, LO and LS Partially Done for ML Creation of 4th layer Yes Done for the West FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No Maximum configuration: 28 UCESO Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 252 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 233.



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LFMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LFMMWM 205 13.2%2014 LFMMFDZ 178 11.5%2014 LFMMMALY 156 10.0%2014 LFMMB3 128 8.2%2014 LFMMRAEE 114 7.3%2014 LFMMGY 94 6.0%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Marseille ACC en-route delays in 2014

Marseille LFMM ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.4% B: -0.8% L: -1.7%

No sig. impact

-0.6% 0.57 0.10 Summer -0.1% 0.86 0.17 Yes 238 (0%)


FRANCE PARIS ACC 17.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay remained at 0.2 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 39% of the delays were due to the reason Weather, 38% due to ATC Capacity, 13% due to Industrial Action (ATC), and 5% due to Airspace Management. Capacity Plan 3% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM / GF project* Yes Reorganisation of lower airspace and delegation of ATS to APP units below FL145 (for relevant airspace) Yes Improvement of profiles for LFPO arrivals from the south-west (IBBP) Yes IBP project - New interface between France & UK Yes Phase 1 completed Point Merge NW Yes FABEC FRA Step 1 : WE DCTs No Maximum configuration: 22 UCESO No Maximum configuration:21 sectors Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 254 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 231.



0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.2

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LFFFALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LFFFTE 148 27.4%2014 LFFFUJ 106 19.7%2014 LFFFLMH 100 18.5%2014 LFFFTNTB 14 2.5%2014 LFFFMHPT 13 2.5%2014 LFFFUKUZ 12 2.2%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Paris ACC en-route delays in 2014

Paris LFFF ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.7% B: 1.0% L: -0.1%

No sig. impact

+0.6% 0.17 0.20 Summer +1.3% 0.20 0.20 No 268 (0%)


FRANCE REIMS ACC 18.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay increased from 0.5 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.6 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 80% of the delays were due to ATC Capacity, and 14% due to Weather. Capacity Plan 3% Achieved Comments Improved airspace management / FUA Yes Staff redeployment / flexible rostering Yes Improved ATFCM procedures and STAM Yes Reorganisation of lower airspace ELLX interface No Upgraded ops room Yes FABEC FRA Step 1: WE DCTs No Maximum configuration: 18 UCESO No Maximum configuration: 16 UCESO Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 186. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 199 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 186.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LFEEACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LFEEHYR 266 25.0%2014 LFEEUXR 113 10.7%2014 LFEE4E 90 8.4%2014 LFEEKR 76 7.1%2014 LFEEKD 68 6.4%2014 LFEEXR 63 5.9%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Reims ACC en-route delays in 2014

Reims LFEE ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.3% B: 0.4% L: -0.8%

+11% +3.8% 0.42 0.14

Summer +4.2% 0.60 0.21 Yes 186 (-3%)


FYROM SKOPJE ACC 19.

Traffic & Delay


The delays remained at zero during Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 10% Achieved Comments Controller ratings Yes

New sector configurations and revised DFL Yes

Dynamic changing of DFL is needed – current system capabilities are limited, full dynamic DFL is expected with the new system in 2017

Revised sector capacities Yes Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period the average peak 1 hour was 45 and the average peak 1 hour was 40.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LWSSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Skopje LWSS ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 6.4% B: 5.3% L: 4.3%

+61% +29.5% 0.00 0.14

Summer +33.4% 0.00 0.19 No 59 (0%)


GERMANY BREMEN ACC 20.

Traffic & Delay



The summer traffic increased by 3.4%. The Average ATFM Delay En-route per Movement was stable at 0.1 min/flight in Summer 2014. The delays were mainly due to ATC Staffing (16%), ATC Capacity (32%) and Weather (45%).

It is assessed that the offered capacity was the same as 2013. The ADM Summer is nearly by the EU reference value. There no capacity deficit was observed.

A maximum configuration of 17+4 consists of 14 en-route sectors and 3 en-route/APP- sectors (Hamburg, Hannover) and 4 APP/TMA- sectors (Berlin). The offered configuration of 14+4 with 11 en-route sectors was opened during the whole

year. The ALLER LOW sector was combined, the sectors EIDER EAST and MÜRITZ LOW were only open for military exercises.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EDWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EDWWHAMC 35 23.8%2014 EDWWHEIC 30 21.0%2014 EDWWDBAS 28 19.6%2014 EDWWDBAN 25 17.5%2014 EDWWHEI 11 7.8%2014 EDWWFLG 11 7.7%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Bremen ACC en-route delays in 2014

Bremen EDWW ACC


Capacity gap?


Traffic Forecast Actual Traffic All reasons

ACC Reference Value

Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.2% B: -0.9% L: -2.7%


+3.4% 0.09 0.10 Summer

+3.4% 0.11 0.10 No 151 (0%)


GERMANY KARLSRUHE ACC 21.

Traffic & Delay


Planned Measures Achieved Comments

SENEKA Phase I Dual ATS routes (09.01.2014) The realisation was completed successfully on 09.01.2014

FRAMaK Free Route Airspace Karlsruhe/Maastricht Phase 4 The realisation was completed

successfully on 01.05.2014

Reduction of staffing problems

FABEC South East SWAP postponed

Testing extension ED R307 (EUFI) Prolonged until the end of 2016


The summer traffic growth reaches 3.1% and is significantly higher than expected. The Average ATFM Delay en-route per Movement increased slightly to 0.3 min./flight compare to the previous summer period. The delays were mainly due to

ATC Staffing (15%), ATC Capacity (17%) and Weather (56%). The high summer delay was generated primarily by Weather. No capacity deficit was observed

The offered capacity increased continuously in 2014. A maximum configuration of 40 en-route sectors was available; the OSTSEE sector was mostly combined (offered configuration of 39 sectors).



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EDUUUAC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EDUUNTM33 127 13.5%2014 EDUUALP13 86 9.2%2014 EDUUCHI1K 56 5.9%2014 EDUUWUR34 49 5.2%2014 EDUUTGO2C 47 5.0%2014 EDUUSPE1P 41 4.4%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Karlsruhe UAC en-route delays in 2014

Karlsruhe EDUU ACC


Capacity gap?



ACC Reference Value

Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.6% B: -0.7% L: -2.2%

+5% +2.9% 0.20 0.20

Summer +3.1% 0.34 0.22 No 347 (+4%)


GERMANY LANGEN ACC 22.

Traffic & Delay



Upgrade of P1/ATCAS system (PSS) EBG03/04 The realisation was completed successfully on 13.04.2014

Upgrade of P1/ATCAS system (PSS) EBG05/06 The realisation was completed successfully on Sep./Dec.2014

Reduction of staffing problems The share of delay caused by ATC Staffing decreased from 30% in 2013 to 20% in 2014


The summer traffic increased in 2014 compared to 2013 by 0.1%. The Average ATFM Delay en-route per Movement was increased slightly to 0.35 min/flight in Summer 2014 compared to the last year. The delays were mainly due to ATC Staffing (20%), ATC Capacity (22%) and

Weather (35%). The offered capacity was also stable in 2014. The ADM in summer is higher than the reference value. No capacity deficit was observed.

A maximum configuration of 23+13 consists of 23 en-route sectors (including 3 sectors with predominantly military traffic) and 2 en-route /APP- sectors (Stuttgart) and 11 APP/TMA- sectors (Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Cologne/Bonn – 2 sectors always combined). The offered configuration is

23+12 sectors.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EDGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EDGGSITA 105 12.9%2014 EDGGKNG 83 10.3%2014 EDGGPAD 69 8.6%2014 EDGG1 66 8.2%2014 EDGG7 61 7.6%2014 EDGGDLA 57 7.0%

0

100

200

300

400


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Langen ACC en-route delays in 2014

Langen EDGG ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: -0.1% B: -1.5% L: -2.8%


+0.0% 0.24 0.17 Summer

+0.1% 0.34 0.20 No 254 (0%)


GERMANY MUNICH ACC 23.

Traffic & Delay



Re-structure airspace – FÜSSEN, ZUGSPITZE and STARNBERG sector (2013) The realisation was completed successfully on

31.12.2013

Testing extension ED R207 (EUFI) The realisation was completed successfully on 10.12.2014


The summer traffic decreased by 0.9%. The Average ATFM Delay En-route per Movement is nearly 0.0 minutes/flight, as in the previous summer period. The delays were mainly due to Weather (95%), ATC Capacity and ATC Staffing (3%). The ADM summer 2014 was below the

reference value. The maximum configuration of 18+4 sectors consists of 15 en-route sectors and 3 en-route /APP- sectors (Nuremberg, Dresden and Leipzig)

and 4 APP/TMA- sectors (Munich). The offered configuration has 15+4 sectors – three en-route sectors (FRANKEN Upper/High, NÖRDLINGEN/WALDA and SACHSEN Low/ High) are mostly combined.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EDMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EDMMFRKHU 21 31.6%2014 EDMMCN2 12 18.5%2014 EDMMFUE 5 7.3%2014 EDMMSAS 5 6.9%2014 EDMMZUS 4 6.5%2014 EDMMTEG 4 5.7%

0

50

100

150


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Munich ACC en-route delays in 2014

Munich EDMM ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.2% B: -1.2% L: -2.5%

-10% -1.1% 0.02 0.21

Summer -0.9% 0.04 0.24 No 246 (0%)


GREECE ATHENS ACC 24.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.11 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.67 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 55% of delays were due to the reason ATC staffing and 43% due ATC capacity. Capacity Plan 1% Achieved Comments Improved ATS route network and airspace management Yes Improved civil/military coordination Yes ATFCM actions (traffic volume monitoring, traffic management scenarios etc…) Yes 4 additional OLDI messages for silent radar transfers No OLDI with Nicosia (Athens ready) No Implemented November 2014 FDPS upgrade including FPL 2012 No Maximum configuration: 5/6 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 118, 4% lower than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 120 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 111.



0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.5

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LGGGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LGGGKFPL 137 23.7%2014 LGGGMIL 129 22.2%2014 LGGGRDS 106 18.2%2014 LGGGMILL 103 17.8%2014 LGGGRDSL 65 11.2%2014 LGGGW 15 2.6%

0

100

200

300

400


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Athens ACC en-route delays in 2014

Athens LGGG ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.1% B: 2.1% L: 0.4%


+8.0% 0.45 0.20 Summer

+10.2% 0.67 0.27 Yes 118 (-4%)


GREECE MAKEDONIA ACC 25.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay increased to 0.24 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 43% of delays were due to the reason ATC staffing, 43% due ATC capacity and 11% due to Equipment (ATC). Capacity Plan 1% Achieved Comments Improved ATS route network and airspace management Yes Improved civil/military coordination Yes ATFCM actions (traffic volume monitoring, traffic management scenarios etc…) Yes 4 additional OLDI messages for silent radar transfers No Resectorisation resulting from the opening of KFOR sector Yes FDPS upgrade including FPL 2012 No Maximum configuration: 4/5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 100, 2% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 99 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 90.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LGMDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LGMDW 86 49.1%2014 LGMDKVL 31 17.5%2014 LGMDEL 18 10.6%2014 LGMDELM 18 10.1%2014 LGMDEUM 15 8.6%2014 LGMDKVLU 2 1.1%

0

20

40

60

80


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Makedonia ACC en-route delays in 2014

Makedonia LGMD ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.3% B: 3.7% L: 2.3%

+3% +9.8% 0.17 0.21

Summer +11.8% 0.24 0.28 No 100 (+2%)


HUNGARY BUDAPEST ACC 26.

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan +2.5% Achieved Comments Optimization of airspace structure Yes FRA (H24, all levels) from 2015.02.05.

Recruitment and training of controllers Yes 6 ACC trainees licenced in 2014, 6 will start OJT in early 2015

Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes Max 8 sector configuration was required in 2014

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 177, 7% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 165 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 147.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LHCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Budapest LHCC ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.1% B: 2.5% L: 0.5%

-11% +12.0% 0.00 0.07

Summer +12.7% 0.00 0.11 No 177 (+7%)


IRELAND DUBLIN ACC 27.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014 as in 2013.

Capacity Plan: 0% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes On-going recruitment to maintain staff levels Yes Cross rating training Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. The peak 1 hour demand was 48 and the peak 3 hour demand was 40.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EIDWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Dublin EIDW ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.0% B: 0.7% L: 0.0%


+5.4% 0.00 0.23 Summer

+4.8% 0.00 0.31 No 59 (0%)


IRELAND SHANNON ACC 28.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014 as in 2013.

Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments Extra sectors as required – Dynamic sectorisation available Yes FAB dynamic sectorisation - Trials Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes CPDLC Yes On-going recruitment to maintain staff levels Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes Developing Queue Management programme Yes Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACCESS measured baseline of 124 indicates the capacity available during the measured period. The peak 1 hour demand was 106 and the peak 3 hour demand was 97.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EISNACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Shannon EISN ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.9% B: 1.0% L: 0.5%


+1.1% 0.00 0.08 Summer

+4.3% 0.00 0.15 No 124 (0%)


ITALY BRINDISI ACC 29.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013. Note: The area of responsibility of Brindisi ACC changed in April 2014. Capacity: 71 Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes

Free-route implementation program Yes Mode S implementation Yes Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 82. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 69 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 62.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Brindisi LIBB ACC


Capacity gap?


Traffic Forecast

Actual Traffic All reasons ACC Reference


Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.0% (-14%) B: 2.3% (-14%) L: 0.1% (-14%)

+3%

-7.1% 0.01 0.03 Summer

-8.0% 0.01 0.05 No 82 (-30%)


ITALY MILAN ACC 30.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013. Note: the area of responsibility of Milano ACC changed in May 2014. Capacity: 185 Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation Yes Mode S implementation (Dec 2013) Yes Free-route implementation program Yes Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes Implementation of CDO in LIML according to ENV01 Yes PBN Program Yes Maximum configuration: 19 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 188. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 183 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 171.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LIMME 27 45.1%2014 LIMMWC 23 37.8%2014 LIMMALL 10 17.0%

0

20

40

60

80


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Milano ACC en-route delays in 2014

Milan LIMM ACC


Capacity gap?


Traffic Forecast



Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.3% (+32%) B: -0.2% (+32%) L: -1.7% (+32%)

No sig. impact

+25.9% 0.03 0.09 Summer

+39.2% 0.00 0.16 No 188 (+15%)


ITALY PADOVA ACC 31.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013.

Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes

Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Implementation of CDO in LIPZ according to ENV01 Yes Mode S implementation Yes Free-route implementation program Yes PBN Program Yes Maximum configuration: 12 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 193, showing a 3% growth compared to Summer 2013. During the measured period (June and July) the average peak 1 hour demand was 182 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 169.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIPPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LIPPCTA 10 100.0%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Padova ACC en-route delays in 2014

Padova LIPP ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.8% B: 0.2% L: -1.6%


+1.8% 0.01 0.10 Summer

+2.6% 0.01 0.16 No 193 (+3%)


ITALY ROME ACC 32.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, the same as during Summer 2013. Note: the area of responsibility of Rome ACC changed in May 2014. Capacity Plan: Capacity: 184 Achieved Comments Flexible opening scheme according to traffic demand and system enablers implementation Yes

Airspace management and ATS route assessment and/or improvements according to network needs, Airspace Users expectations, ENAV’s Flight Efficiency Plan and/or BLUEMED FAB implementation

Yes

Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Implementation of CDO in LIRF according to ENV01 Yes Free-route implementation program Yes Airspace and configuration re-organization Yes PBN Program Yes Maximum configuration: 19/21 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed measured at 198. During the measured period (June and July), the average peak 1 hour demand was 188 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 173.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LIRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Rome LIRR ACC


Capacity gap?


Traffic Forecast



Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.8% (-19%) B: -0.5% (-19%) L: -2.2% (-19%)

No sig. impact

-12.7% 0.00 0.06 Summer

-18.9% 0.00 0.10 No 198 (-19%)


LATVIA RIGA ACC 33.

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Various ATM system improvements Yes Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 APP Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as in 2012. The average peak 1 hour demand was 68 and the peak 3 hour demand was 61 flights during the measured period, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet the demand.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EVRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Riga EVRR ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.4% B: 0.4% L: -1.5%


+2.6% 0.00 0.05 Summer

+3.3% 0.00 0.05 No 85 (0%)


LITHUANIA VILNIUS ACC 34.

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. The peak 1 hour demand was 55 and the peak 3 hour demand was 51 during the measured period.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EYVCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Vilnius EYVC ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.1% B: 3.0% L: 1.2%


+5.7% 0.00 0.06 Summer

+6.1% 0.00 0.09 No 77 (0%)


MALTA MALTA ACC 35.

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments 1 new Mode S radar Yes Maximum configuration: 2 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS. During June and July, the average peak 1 hour demand was 25 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 21 flights per hour.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LMMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Malta LMMM ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.2% B: 4.4% L: -0.4%

-4% -7.1% 0.00 0.05

Summer -10.4% 0.00 0.06 No 39 (0%)


MOLDOVA CHISINAU ACC 36.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes Maximum configuration: 2 sectors Sufficient to meet the traffic demand

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 40. The peak 1 hour demand was 18 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 15.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LUUUACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Chisinau LUUU ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.5% B: 2.1% L: 0.3%


-24.8% 0.00 0.00 Summer

-31.7% 0.00 0.00 No 40 (0%)


THE NETHERLANDS AMSTERDAM ACC 37.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight slightly increased from 0.15 minutes per flight during Summer 2013 to 0.17 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 68% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 28% for reason Weather. Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 137, representing the delivered capacity. This was sufficient to accommodate the traffic demand, with an average peak 1 hour of 120 during the measured period and an average peak 3 hour of 108.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EHAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EHAACBAS 187 97.6%2014 EHAASECT2 5 2.4%

0

50

100

150

200


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Amsterdam ACC en-route delays in 2014

Amsterdam EHAA ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.5% B: -0.1% L: -0.4%


+2.3% 0.13 0.18 Summer

+2.0% 0.17 0.20 No 137 (0%)


NORWAY BODO ACC 38.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.0 min/flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Achieved Comments Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes

New ATM system in Bodo Oceanic No The system failed before implementation, still work in progress.

Maximum configuration: 6 + 1 oceanic Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak hour demand was 47 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 43.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

ENBDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 ENBDS 6 46.2%2014 ENBDALL 3 27.9%2014 ENBDNLE 2 13.8%2014 ENBDCHETA 1 10.2%2014 ENOBOA80 0 2.0% 0

5

10

15


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Bodo ACC en-route delays in 2014

Bodo ENBD ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.9% B: 1.4% L: 0.9%


+4.1% 0.02 0.02 Summer

+3.6% 0.04 0.00 No 57 (0%)


NORWAY OSLO ACC 39.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Additional controllers No New rostering, better efficiency. Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Enhanced sector configurations No Re-assessment of sector capacities following CAPAN study Yes Work in progress.

Maximum configuration: 5 (Summer), 7 (Winter) No Traffic during summer is equivalent or greater than winter, should be 7 for both.

Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity offered was measured with ACCESS at a level of 91, for an average peak demand of 82 (peak 1 hour) and 76 (peak 3 hour).



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

ENOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 ENOS1267 4 45.8%2014 ENOSFAR 3 38.4%2014 ENOS345 1 8.2%2014 ENOS67 1 7.6%2014 ENOS3458 0 0.0% 0

2

4

6

8

10


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Oslo ACC en-route delays in 2014

Oslo ENOS ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.5% B: 3.2% L: 2.1%


+1.2% 0.01 0.01 Summer

+0.7% 0.01 0.01 No 91 (+6%)


NORWAY STAVANGER ACC 40.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes ADSB offshore Yes First to implement world wide New Voice Com System March 14 Yes Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 helicopter Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 63 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak demand was 57 (peak 1 hour) and 52 (peak 3 hour).



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

ENSVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 ENSVSSX 28 88.6%2014 ENSV3 2 5.3%2014 ENZVTA 1 3.2%2014 ENSVE 0 1.4%2014 ENSV4 0 1.4%2014 ENSVN 0 0.1%

0

10

20

30

40

50


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Stavanger ACC en-route delays in 2014

Stavanger ENSV ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.8% B: 3.0% L: 2.2%


+2.0% 0.05 0.09 Summer

+1.6% 0.08 0.11 No 63 (+9%)


POLAND WARSAW ACC 41.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.51 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 1.14 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 63% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 13% for ATC Staffing, 10% for Weather and 9% for Special Event. Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments Mode S Yes

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes Flexible sector’s RATE and occupancy management. Successful usage of MCP

New ATM system in operation (Nov 2013) Yes Reached full flat performance in May 2014

4 ATCOs less Yes Improved sector configurations and management of configurations Yes

Increased number of available and useful configurations

Re-evaluation of sector capacities Yes

Maximum configuration: 9 sectors Yes 9 sector configuration used on demand up to 90 min. of duration

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/Reverse CASA at 135, 4% lower than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 150 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 141.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EPWWACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EPWWJ 345 23.0%2014 EPWWG 319 21.3%2014 EPWWR 164 10.9%2014 EPWWD 147 9.8%2014 EPWWTC 138 9.2%2014 EPWWBD 106 7.1%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Warsaw ACC en-route delays in 2014

Warsaw EPWW ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.3% B: 0.2% L: -1.7%


+1.2% 0.81 0.26 Summer

+2.1% 1.14 0.28 Yes 135 (-4%)


PORTUGAL LISBON ACC 42.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.2 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.29 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 63% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 33% for ATC Staffing. Capacity Plan 8 % Achieved Comments Flexible rostering and sector opening schemes Yes Enhanced ATFCM procedures Yes Free route extension to LECM FIR Yes Reduction of separation minima from 8 to 5 NM No Postponed to Winter 2014/15 Update traffic volume definition to take new traffic pattern into account in line with the free route extension to LECM FIR Yes Vertical Split of West sector Yes Increase capacity in MAD sector Yes Area Proximity warning (APW) No Postponed to Winter 2014/15 Maximum configuration: 9 (7 ENR+2 TMA) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 94, 7% higher than in 2013. During the measured period (June and July AIRAC cycles), the average peak 1 hour demand was 94 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 85.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LPPCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LPPCNORTH 151 23.0%2014 LPPCWEST 117 17.8%2014 LPPCNXUPP 116 17.7%2014 LPPCCEU 62 9.5%2014 LPPCSOUTH 51 7.8%2014 LPPCCEN 38 5.9%

0

100

200

300

400

500


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Lisbon ACC en-route delays in 2014

Lisbon LPPC ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 6.8% B: 5.1% L: 3.7%


+6.9% 0.53 0.16 Summer

+8.2% 0.29 0.21 Yes 94 (+7%)


ROMANIA BUCHAREST ACC 43.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route ATFM delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014, the same as in Summer 2013.

Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments ATS route network and sectorisation improvements Yes Maximum configuration: 20 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. It was calculated with NEVAC, giving the potential capacity of the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 144 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 133.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LRBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Bucharest LRBB ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.4% B: 2.7% L: 0.6%


+16.9% 0.00 0.00 Summer

+17.9% 0.00 0.00 No 183 (0%)


SERBIA & MONTENEGRO BELGRADE ACC 44.

Traffic & Delay


En-route delay remained at zero in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 0% Achieved Comments New sectorisation Yes FUA No Full regulatory framework still missing Maximum configuration: 10 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 165. The peak 1 hour demand was 145 and the peak 3 hour demand was 131 during the measurement period.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LYBAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Belgrade LYBA ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 4.3% B: 2.7% L: 1.2%


+7.0% 0.00 0.13 Summer

+7.7% 0.00 0.20 No 165 (+1%)


SLOVAK REPUBLIC BRATISLAVA ACC 45.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight increased to 0.2 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 63% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 15% for ATC Staffing, 10% for Airspace Management, 7% for Weather and 5% for Equipment (ATC). Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments Continuous improvements of the route network and sectorisation Yes

Optimisation of sector opening times Yes Improved flow and capacity management techniques Yes Continuous recruitment to increase staff level Yes Enhanced sectorisation according to the FABCE airspace plan Yes Mode S in Backup ATM System No Planned for Winter 2014 Maximum configuration: 5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 119, 8% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 118 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 102.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LZBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Bratislava LZBB ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.9% B: 2.5% L: 0.5%

-16% +10.0% 0.14 0.19

Summer +11.2% 0.23 0.29 No 119 (+8%)


SLOVENIA LJUBLJANA ACC 46.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained zero in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 5% Achieved Comments

New sector configurations and revised DFL Yes New DFLs were added and 5th sector implemented

Enhanced ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes OTMVs defined, occupancy used Additional ATCOs will be recruited as necessary Yes Training for mixed licenses is ongoing. ATS route network and traffic organisation changes Yes DCTs H24 implemented in March 2014 Enhanced sectorization according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan, including FRA Yes Flexible sector configurations Yes

Mode S Ongoing New RDR being implemented, declaration of ModeS airspace expected by 2016.

System upgrades as necessary Yes Maximum configuration: 4/5 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS, representing the delivered capacity (87). The peak 1 hour demand was 78 and the peak 3 hour demand was 70 during the measurement period.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enr

oute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LJLAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Ljubljana LJLA ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.8% B: -0.8% L: -2.4%

+25% +5.7% 0.00 0.22

Summer +8.0% 0.00 0.28 No 87 (0%)


SPAIN BARCELONA ACC 47.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.67 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.55 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 71% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 28% for Weather. Capacity Plan: 2% Achieved Comments Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Optimised sector configurations Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes

SWFAB/FABEC Marseille interface, including LUMAS Partially

Improved airspace availability around D54 during 15 June – 15 Sept period Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface

SWFAB/FABEC Bordeaux interface Partially Re-alignment with the projects related to the French-Spanish interface

Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 11 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 144. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 144 and the peak 3 hour demand was 136.



0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LECBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LECBP1U 134 17.5%2014 LECBCCC 115 15.1%2014 LEBLT1E 91 12.0%2014 LEBLF07 76 10.0%2014 LECBBAS 69 9.1%2014 LEBLXAL 61 7.9%

0

200

400

600

800

1000


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Barcelona ACC en-route delays in 2014

Barcelona LECB ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.9% B: 0.7% L: -4.9%


+1.8% 0.37 0.13 Summer

+2.6% 0.55 0.20 Yes 144 (+4%)


SPAIN CANARIAS ACC 48.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.14 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.39 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 77% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, and 19% for Weather. Capacity Plan: 0% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 9 (5 APP/3+1ENR) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 68. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 63 and the peak 3 hour demand was 56.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

GCCCACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 GCCCAAC 145 44.8%2014 GCCCRNE 52 16.0%2014 GCCCINB 50 15.6%2014 GCCCRC2 45 13.8%2014 GCCCRU6 11 3.3%2014 GCCCRE2 9 2.7%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Canarias ACC en-route delays in 2014

Canarias GCCC ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 13.2% B: 10.8% L: 8.7%


+6.9% 0.42 0.28 Summer

+8.5% 0.39 0.26 Yes 68 (+5%)


SPAIN MADRID ACC 49.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.25 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.09 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 48% of the delays were for the reason Other, 31% for ATC Capacity, and 16% for Equipment. Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes Safety nets On-going Free route in SAN and ASI sectors (FRASAI) Yes Maximum configuration: 17 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 199. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 188 and the peak 3 hour demand was 175.



0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LECMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 BEGAS 46 26.6%2014 LECMBLI 19 11.1%2014 LECMSAN 18 10.3%2014 LECMCTA 14 7.8%2014 LECMTLU 11 6.3%2014 LECMPAU 9 5.2%

0

100

200

300

400


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Madrid ACC en-route delays in 2014

Madrid LECM ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.7% B: 2.4% L: 1.0%


+5.0% 0.07 0.22 Summer

+5.5% 0.09 0.19 No 199 (+9%)


SPAIN PALMA ACC 50.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.17 minutes in Summer 2013 to 0.15 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 98% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity. Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Additional staff from TWR liberalization process Yes Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 7/8 (3/4 APP + 4 ENR) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS/REVERSE CASA at 92. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 91, the peak 3 hour demand was 81.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LECPACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LECPMXX 62 79.2%2014 LECPIRX 7 8.3%2014 LECPIXX 5 5.8%2014 LECP12O 3 3.2%2014 LECPIAX 1 1.4%2014 LECPGMX 1 1.4%

0

20

40

60

80

100


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Palma ACC en-route delays in 2014

Palma LECP ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.5% B: -0.4% L: -1.5%


+3.1% 0.11 0.14 Summer

+4.8% 0.15 0.19 No 92 (0%)


SPAIN SEVILLA ACC 51.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay decreased from 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: 0% Achieved Comments Optimised sector configurations Yes Improved ATFCM Yes Potential additional staff from TWR liberalization process No Minor ATC system upgrades Yes Safety nets On-going Maximum configuration: 7 (5 ACC+2 APP) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 89. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 79 and the peak 3 hour demand was 69.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LECSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LECSSEV 10 44.8%2014 LECSNCS 4 16.8%2014 LECSCES 3 12.9%2014 LECSNOR 2 7.7%2014 LECSNO1 2 6.8%2014 LECSMA4 1 6.1%

0

10

20

30

40

50


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Seville ACC en-route delays in 2014

Sevilla LECS ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.8% B: 3.3% L: 2.3%

No sig. impact

+2.5% 0.03 0.29 Summer +1.2% 0.02 0.32 No 89 (0%)


SWEDEN MALMO ACC 52.

Traffic & Delay



Capacity Plan 1 % Achieved Comments Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes Minor updates of COOPANS Yes Maximum configuration: 4/5 (E) + 3/4 (W) +2 (L) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 120 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 109.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

ESMMACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 ESMM2 5 51.8%2014 ESMM2W 2 21.2%2014 ESMM89 1 11.4%2014 ESMM67Y 1 5.6%2014 ESMMKL 0 3.3%2014 ESMM67 0 3.2%

0

1

2

3

4

5


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Malmo ACC en-route delays in 2014

Malmo ESMM ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 3.2% B: 1.1% L: -0.6%

+4% +0.6% 0.01 0.07

Summer +1.1% 0.01 0.10 No 124 (0%)


SWEDEN STOCKHOLM ACC 53.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight slightly increased to 0.09 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 58% of the delays were for the reason Equipment (ATC) and 33% for Weather. Capacity Plan 1 % Achieved Comments Continuous improvements on the ATS route network Yes Optimizing the use of FRA when military areas are active Yes Sector configurations adapted to traffic demand Yes Maintain appropriate level of staffing to open up to 11 sectors Yes Minor updates of COOPANS Yes Maximum configuration: 3 (M) + 4 (N) + 4 (S) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was estimated to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 82 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 75.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

ESOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 ESSATMA 18 31.8%2014 ESSAE 18 31.2%2014 ESSAW 12 21.7%2014 ESOS2 5 8.0%2014 ESSAS 2 2.8%2014 NILUG 1 2.4%

0

10

20

30

40


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Stockholm ACC en-route delays in 2014

Stockholm ESOS ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 2.9% B: 1.2% L: -0.2%

+4% +0.8% 0.05 0.00

Summer +0.6% 0.09 0.00 No 112 (0%)


SWITZERLAND GENEVA ACC 54.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight remained at the same level as in 2013. 35% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 33% for ATC Staffing, 26% for Weather reasons and 6% due to ATC Equipment. Capacity Plan 2% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes Stripless INI step 2 Yes Cross qualification of ATCOs (Upper/Lower) Yes Flight Plan adherence Yes Enhanced Mode S Yes Maximum configuration: 8/9 sectors (5/6 + 3) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 151, which represents the capacity delivered during the Summer season in the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 144, and the peak 3 hour demand was 135.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LSAGACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LSAGSE 32 18.9%2014 LSAGL4 27 16.1%2014 LSAGL12 22 13.2%2014 LSAGL5 18 11.0%2014 LSAGN 18 10.7%2014 LSAGL34 15 9.0%

0

20

40

60

80


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Geveva ACC en-route delays in 2014

Geneva LSAG ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.8% B: -1.0% L: -1.9%

+4% +1.7% 0.10 0.13

Summer +2.1% 0.15 0.18 No 151 (+2%)


SWITZERLAND ZURICH ACC 55.

Traffic & Delay


The average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.21 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.11 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 71% of delays were for the reason ATC Capacity, 20% for Weather, 7% for ATC Equipment and 2% for ATC Staffing. Capacity Plan 1% Achieved Comments Improved ATFCM Procedures and STAM Yes Crystal – Traffic and complexity prediction tool Yes Stripless step 2 Yes Flight Plan adherence Yes Revised sector capacities following CAPAN study No CAPAN confirmed the existing capacities Enhanced Mode S Yes

Maximum configuration: 10 sectors No Maximum configuration: 9 sectors 10 sector configuration was not required

Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS at 174. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 165, and the peak 3 hour demand was 155.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LSAZACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LSAZM4 48 29.9%2014 LSAZM5 32 19.8%2014 LSAZM123 20 12.4%2014 LSZBTA 17 10.7%2014 LSZBAOR 16 10.2%2014 LSZHTMA 10 6.2%

0

50

100

150

200

250


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Zurich ACC en-route delays in 2014

Zurich LSAZ ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: -0.6% B: -2.0% L: -3.2%

+4% +0.5% 0.08 0.10

Summer +1.4% 0.11 0.16 No 174 (+2%)


TURKEY ANKARA /ISTANBUL ACC 56.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight in Ankara ACC remained at 0.1 minutes per flight in Summer 2014. 60% of the delays were for the reason ATC Capacity and 40% for the reason Other. Capacity Plan Achieved Comments Improved civil/military coordination Yes ATS route structure development Yes Additional controllers (45 per year for en-route) Yes

New Ankara ACC (Max 25 physical sectors + 5 optional) - Implementation of SMART system Ongoing

Provisional Site Acceptance Tests completed – Preparation for transition on-going


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

LTBBACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Ankara LTAA ACC


Capacity gap?



ACC Reference Value

Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year

H: 8.2% B: 6.7% L: 4.8%

No sig. impact

Ankara: 13.0% Istanbul: 11.7%

Ankara: 0.12% Istanbul: 0.00% 0.13

Summer Ankara: +13.6% Istanbul: +11.8%

Ankara: 0.11% Istanbul: 0.00% 0.19 No Ankara: 227 (+51%)


Mode S Yes To be operational with SMART Maximum configuration: 20 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment Ankara: The capacity baseline of 161 was calculated with ACCESS, representing the capacity offered during the measured period. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 156 and the peak 3 hour demand was 141. A maximum configuration of 11 sectors was opened. Istanbul: The capacity baseline of 154 was calculated with ACCESS, representing the capacity offered during the measured period. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 147 and the peak 3 hour demand was 139. A maximum configuration of 3 sectors was opened. Izmir: The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 60 and the peak 3 hour demand was 53. A maximum configuration of 6 sectors was opened, including APP sectors.



Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 LTAASET 127 45.7%2014 NINVA 58 20.9%2014 LTAANOU 51 18.5%2014 LTAANOC 22 7.9%2014 LTAANOZ 13 4.7%2014 LTAAWEY 3 1.0%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Ankara ACC en-route delays in 2014


UKRAINE DNIPROPRETROVSK ACC 57.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2013.

Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives No

Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. The related ATM system adjustments are in progress. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)

ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014

Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors No

The area of responsibility of Dnipropetrovsk ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (6 sectors)

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 54, 10% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 28 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 24.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

UKDVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Dnipro-petrovsk UKDV ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 8.3% B: 6.4% L: 4.5%


-50.1% 0.00 0.19 Summer

-63.0% 0.00 0.29 No 54 (+10%)


UKRAINE KYIV ACC 58.

Traffic & Delay



Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development Yes

Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives Yes

Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)

ATFCM training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL No

Training of ATCO/FMP personnel at EUROCONTROL was suspended by UkSATSE since April 2014

Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 73, 1% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 58 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 50.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

UKBVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Kyiv UKBV ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 7.6% B: 5.5% L: 4.0%


-18.2% 0.00 0.08 Summer

-22.8% 0.00 0.12 No 73 (+1%)


UKRAINE L’VIV ACC 59.

Traffic & Delay






Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives

No

Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 (operational FSAs and CPRs) will be possible after the commencement of operations from the new ATM system. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)

Installation of new ATM system (training and transition periods – from August to November 2014) No

The commencement of operations from the new ATM system was shifted to March 2015

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2013. The peak 1 hour demand was 45 flights, and the peak 3 hour demand was 40 flights.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

UKLVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

L’viv UKLV ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 5.0% B: 3.6% L: 2.1%


-27.7% 0.00 0.00 Summer

-34.0% 0.00 0.00 No 72 (0%)


UKRAINE ODESA ACC 60.

Traffic & Delay




Implementation of FCM01 and FCM03 objectives

No

Implementation of FCM01 is partially implemented; the implementation of CPRs was temporally postponed (since April 2014) and then it was resumed. Full implementation of FCM03 is conditioned by the terms of implementation of AMHS (ESSIP COM10)




The area of responsibility of Odesa ACC was changed which lead to change of maximum configuration (5 sectors)

Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured at 61 in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 33 flights and the the peak 3 hour demand was 28 flights.


0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

UKOVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

Odesa UKOV ACC

Traffic Evolution (2014 v 2013)

En-route Delay (min. per flight)

Capacity gap?



ACC Reference Value

Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year H: 6.2% B: 3.7% L: 2.1%

+3%

-4.9% 0.00 0.00 Summer

-6.9% 0.00 0.00 No 61 (+3%)


UNITED KINGDOM LONDON ACC 61.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.12 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to 0.07 minutes per flight in Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive). Capacity Plan: 4% Achieved Comments Traffic Management Improvements Yes Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes Flexible use of existing staff (including cross-sector training) more closely related to sector demand Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes Further benefits from the implementation of iFACTS (Nov 2011) Yes FAB dynamic sectorisation Trials Yes CPDLC Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes Developing Queue Management programme Yes On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes Maximum configuration: 23 sectors Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity of 410 was calculated with ACCESS. During the period June/July, the peak hour demand was 410, the peak 3 hour demand was 371.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EGTTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EGTT17LYD 73 28.1%2014 EGTT02LUE 28 10.6%2014 EGTTDVR 21 8.1%2014 EGTT01LUW 18 6.8%2014 EGTTNOR 10 4.0%2014 EGTTBCB 10 3.9%

0

100

200

300

400


daily

del

ay (m

in)

London ACC en-route delays in 2014

London EGTT ACC


Capacity gap?



ACC Reference Value

Current Routes

Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.3% B: 0.4% L: -0.9%


+2.2% 0.05 0.14 Summer

+2.2% 0.07 0.24 No 410 (+3%)


UNITED KINGDOM LONDON TC 62.

Traffic & Delay


Average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Traffic Management Improvements Yes Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes Flexible use of existing staff Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes Developing Queue Management programme Yes Collaborative TMA developments No TC sector improvements No On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes Maximum configuration: 22 (14 ENR + 8 APP) Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCES at 285, 3% higher that Summer 2013. During the period June/July, the peak hour demand was 282, the peak 3 hour demand was 254.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EGTTTC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EGTTLOR 17 35.1%2014 EGTTTMS 14 27.8%2014 LAM 10 21.1%2014 EGTTWEL 6 12.3%2014 EGTTOCKC 2 3.7% 0

10

20

30

40


daily

del

ay (m

in)

London TMA TC en-route delays in 2014

London EGTT TC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 1.9% B: 1.3% L: -0.1%


+3.0% 0.01 0.11 Summer

+2.8% 0.02 0.14 No 285 (+3%)


UNITED KINGDOM PRESTWICK ACC 63.

Traffic & Delay


The delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan: 1% Achieved Comments Traffic Management Improvements Yes Adaptation of sector configurations to demand Yes Flexible use of existing staff Yes Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes Complexity reduction and improved traffic presentation between sectors / ANSPs Yes FAB dynamic sectorisation Trials Yes CPDLC Yes UK / Ireland FAB initiatives Yes On-going recruitment to maintain agreed business service levels Yes


Maximum configuration: 25 sectors is sufficient for traffic demand following resectorisation

Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline of 225 was measured with ACCESS. During the period June/July, the peak 1 hour demand was 204, the peak 3 hour demand was 186.



0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Enro

ute

Del

ay (m

inut

es p

er fl

ight

)

IFR

flig

hts

(Dai

ly A

vera

ge)

EGPXALL - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays


Avg Daily ER Delays


2014 EGCCEE 24 57.0%2014 EGPXHUM 11 25.0%2014 EGPXCEN 6 13.3%2014 EGPXMOC 1 2.9%2014 EGCCIOM 1 1.6%2014 EGPXMOH 0 0.3%

0

10

20

30

40


daily

del

ay (m

in)

Scottish ACC en-route delays in 2014

Prestwick EGPX ACC


Capacity gap?




Shortest Routes

Year H: 0.1% B: -1.0% L: -2.1%


+0.2% 0.02 0.20 Summer

-0.9% 0.03 0.26 No 225 (0%)

NM Annual Network Operations Report 2014 Page 1

If you any questions on the content of this report or require further information on network performance reporting of the European ATM network, please contact us at: Operational Analysis & Reporting, Performance, Forecasts and Relations (PFR) Unit, Network Manager Directorate (NMD), EUROCONTROL, 96 Rue de la Fusée, B - 1130 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 729 1155 Fax: +32 (0)2 729 9189 mailto:[email protected] http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/network-operations-monitoring-and-reporting

mailto:[email protected]?subject=Annual%20Network%20Operations%20Report%202014%20Annex%20II%20-%20Contact

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/network-operations-monitoring-and-reporting

EUROCONTROL

June 2015 - © European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL)

This document is published by EUROCONTROL for information purposes. It may be copied in

whole or in part, provided that EUROCONTROL is mentioned as the source and it is not used for

commercial purposes (i.e. for financial gain). The information in this document may not be modified

without prior written permission from EUROCONTROL.

www.eurocontrol.int

annual network operations report 2014 - eurocontrol · eurocontrol annex ii - acc annual network...

Documents