annual plan - dpme plan and annual rep… · § the app carries through the policy priorities...
TRANSCRIPT
ANNUALPERFORMANCE
PLAN2017 -2018
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
1
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Annual Performance Plan 2017/18
DATE OF TABLING: MARCH 2017
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
2
The APP 2017/18 of the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation is compiled with the latest available information to the Department.
For more information, please contact:
Clement T. Madale Head of the Office of the Director General
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation
Private Bag X944
Pretoria
0001
South Africa
Tel: +27 12 308 1900
Fax: +27 12 300 5707
www.dpme.gov.za
RP62/2017ISBN: 978-0-621-45241-9Title of Publications: Department of Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation: Annual Performance Plan 2017/2018
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
3
Table of ContentsFOREWORD 5
1) Vision 10
2) Mission 10
3) Updated situational analysis 10
3.1 Performance environment 10
3.2 Organisational environment 11
4) Revisions to legislative and other mandates 12
5) Overview of 2017/18 budget and MTEF estimates 13
5.1 Programme Budget structure 13
5.2 Expenditure Estimates for all programmes 15
6) Programme 1: Administration 18
6.1 Programme Overview 18
6.2 Key Challenges 18
6.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 18
6.4 Sub-programme: Departmental Management 20
6.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 32
7) Programme 2: National Planning Coordination 33
7.1 Purpose of the programme 33
7.2 Key Challenges 33
7.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 33
7.4 Programme 2: National Planning Coordination 35
7.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 42
8) Programme 3: Sector Planning and Monitoring 43
8.1 Purpose of the programme 43
8.2 Key Challenges 43
8.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 43
8.4 Programme 3 44
8.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 48
9) Programme 4: Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity Development 49
9.1 Purpose of the programme 49
9.2 Key Challenges 49
9.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 49
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
4
9.4 Programme 4 50
9.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 55
10) Programme 5: Frontline and Citizen Based Service Delivery Monitoring 56
10.1 Purpose of the programme 56
10.2 Key Challenges 56
10.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 56
10.4 Programme 5 56
10.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 60
11) Programme 6: Evidence and Knowledge Systems 61
11.1 Purpose of the programme 61
11.2 Key Challenges 61
11.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 61
11.4 Programme 6 62
11.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 68
12) Programme 7: National Youth Development 67
12.1 Purpose of the programme 69
12.2 Key Challenges 69
12.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance 69
12.4 Programme 7 70
12.5 Reconciling performance targets with Budget and MTEF 73
13) Links to long term infrastructure and other capital assets 76
14) Conditional grants 76
15) Public entities 76
16) Public private partnerships 76
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
5
Foreword
Minister: Jeff Radebe Deputy Minister: Buti Manamela
I am pleased to present the Annual Performance Plan (APP) for the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation for the 2017-2018 financial year. As we continue to implement the objectives set out in the National Development Plan (2030), the Department continues to review its organisational and operational environments to enhance the effectiveness of its strategies in institutionalising planning and conducting monitoring and evaluation of the implementation government plans and programmes.
This APP is underpinned by the need of the Department to review its strategies for planning, monitoring and evaluation. In this regard, a service delivery framework, together with the related business processes, feature as critical elements for enhancing the performance of government in its endeavour to fight poverty, reduce unemployment and address inequality. To this end, the Department is prioritising various programmes – not only to strengthen the Planning function, but also to review its monitoring and evaluation strategies to address the identified weaknesses.
This APP therefore focuses the work of the Department to address:
§ Coordination of macro-planning to ensure policy coherence and to support the implementation of the NDP priorities through the MTSF as outline in the Green Paper on National Strategic Planning (2009);
§ Coordinate micro-planning through facilitation of the development of strategic sector specific plans to ensure attainment of sustainable development goals. For example, water and energy sectors plans;
§ Assess and support alignment of departments’ strategic and annual plans with the NDP/MTSF and other priorities such as the Nine Point Plan;
§ Working with National Treasury to assess and support alignment of national budgets to the NDP/MTSF and other government priorities;
§ Monitor and evaluate the progress on the implementation of government policies, plans and programmes towards the NDP 2030 goals of addressing poverty, unemployment and inequality, and outline remedial intervention in line with the policy on: Improving Government Performance: Our Approach (2009). This work entails monitoring and evaluating the impact of returns on investment in government programmes such education, health; infrastructure, and including the impact of role of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and Development Finance
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
6
Institutions (DFIs) in eradicating poverty, reducing inequality and promoting unemployment opportunities and economic growth;
§ Expand on the ground monitoring to gather monitoring evidence. This entails the roll-out of programmes such as the Presidential monitoring programmes, as the Presidential Hotline and Frontline Delivery Monitoring visits. Cabinet has taken various decisions on the roll-out of these programmes. For example, monitoring and reporting on payment of suppliers within 30-days of receipts of receipts of valid invoices, reforms in mining towns and labour sending areas, et cetera;
§ Factoring youth development into the work of the department. Youth development is a top policy priority of government to ensure that South Africa can benefit from the demographic dividend of a youthful population.
§ The National Youth Development Agency Act, 2008 (Act 54 of 2008) provides for the establishment of National Youth Agency (NYDA). The Department will review the NYDA Act with a view of locating the policy making function within DPME. The NYDA will continue to be an implementing agent for youth development programmes and initiatives while DPME will be responsible for policy and ensure mainstreaming of the youth development programmes within government and the private sector.
§ The APP carries through the policy priorities outlined in the Strategic Plan. The policy priorities also strengthen our core business and provide avenues to fulfil the goals of the National Development Plan (NDP) and the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) for the remainder of the term of office of the current Administration.
Minister Jeff Radebe (MP) Deputy Minister Manamela (MP)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
7
Official Sign-Off
It is hereby certified that this Annual Performance Plan:
§ Was developed by the management of the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) under the guidance of Minister Jeff Radebe and Deputy Minister Buti Manamela
§ Was prepared in line with the current Strategic Plan of the management of the Department Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation
§ Accurately reflects the performance targets which DPME will endeavour to achieve, given the resources made available in the budget for 2016-2017
Mr. Pieter Pretorius: Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Clement T Madale: Official responsible for Planning
Mr. Tshediso Matona: Accounting Officer (Acting)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
8
PART A
OVERVIEW
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
10
1) Vision
Improved government outcomes and impact on society.
2) Mission
To ensure the implementation of the development goals and objectives of government as embodied in the NDP through effective and dynamic planning, monitoring, evaluation and implementation support.
3) Updated situational analysis
The current performance environment has been characterised by a constant change in the delivery strategies in the quest to create public value to citizens. Since its establishment after the 2014 general elections, the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation strived to integrate the work of the National Planning Commission (NPC) Secretariat and the Department of Planning Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME). The department conducted a strategy review exercise to determine weakness and risks associated with the current strategic focus and organisational arrangements.
The review showed that since the merging of the planning, monitoring and evaluations functions per Government Proclamation No. 47, 2014, no review of the service delivery model, business processes and the organisational structure to support integration of the work of the new department. As a result, the two departments continued to operate independently resulting in duplications and lack of integration.
In addition, the Department has reviewed and rationalised the performance indicators in the revised APP for 2017/18 financial year with a view to make it more strategic in focus.
3.1 Performance environment
The strategic and organisational review of the department during 2016 identified a number of weaknesses. Key amongst these weaknesses were:
§ Lack of rigor in institutionalizing planning across government
§ Monitoring and evaluation instruments have been found not to effectively deal with performance failures
§ Ineffective monitoring of the strategic levers of government such as the impact of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) in tackling the triple challenges of poverty, unemployment and the rising inequality.
§ Lack of requisite skills, competencies, expertise, experience and qualifications to carry out some of the critical elements of monitoring such as budget for effective implementation of NDP priorities
§ Lack of capacity to intervene to unblock challenges in order to meet the desired outcomes and impact of government’s programmes on citizens.
Part A: Strategic Overview
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
11
§ Poor planning, monitoring and evaluation, which affects the design of what government does, and its ability to learn and improve.
To effectively deal with these challenges, DPME will work towards completing the overarching framework for institutionalizing planning and rolling it out for the remainder of the term of the current Administration. Also, the Department will work with the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) to finalise the proclamation to expedite the transfer of the Spatial planning function to DPME.
In addition, the Department will work towards the finalisation of the National Spatial Development Framework(NSDF) and build the capability to develop sector specific plan aligned to the NDP in partnership with relevant sectors -beginning with the finalization of the Water plan by during 2017.
DPME will influence the extent to which the budget is directed towards the NDP/MTSF priorities; proactively monitor SOEs and DFIs; revise its M&E instruments to focus on tracking the impact of government interventions on people lives; strengthen the use of evidence in planning, monitoring and evaluation by working with Statistics South Africa (StatsSA).
3.2 Organisational environment
During the strategy review exercise, the organisational configuration and capacity requirements of the Department were found to be inadequate. For example, the department operate through individuals instead of through cross-functional teams. The results are over reliance on individuals with the consequence that, in the absence of those individuals, the work of the department is compromised. DPME is also over-reliant on evidence coming from co-ordinating departments to validate performance data against the 14 priority outcomes of government. Limited validation done through Frontline Monitoring, Presidential Hotline and Siyahloya programmes is insufficient.
To address these organisational weaknesses and to achieve the strategic outcomes of the department, the operating model and organisational structure of the department have been revised. The table below depicts the changes:
Current Programmes/Branches (As is)
Proposed changed state (To be) Rational for change
Branch 1: Administration Branch 1: Administration Increase capacity and number of programmes and sub-programmes
Branch 4: Planning Branch 2: National Planning Coordination
Supports NPC and coordinates planning functions across government and the department
Branch 2: Outcomes Monitoring and Evaluation (OME)
Branch 3: Sector Planning and Monitoring
Combining the former OME branch as well as sector experts from the planning branch
New Branch 4: Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity Development
Combines Outcomes 9,12 and LGMIM from OME. Management performance monitoring and Capacity development from IPM&E
Branch 3: Institutional Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (IPM&E)
Branch 5: Frontline and Citizen Based Service Delivery Monitoring
Focusses on on-the-ground- monitoring
New Programme 6: Evidence and Knowledge Systems
Formerly part of OME, now reconfigured to support and coordinate evidence, data, knowledge needs of whole department
Branch 5: Youth Development Branch 7: National Youth Development
Creation of capacity for policy co-ordination and facilitating youth integration in government and outside government
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
12
As indicated above, the Department reviewed its Organisational Structure taking into consideration the capacity required to deliver on its current mandate. The revised structure will be implemented, in Phases, over the MTEF in line with the baseline budget allocations.
4) Revisions to legislative and other mandates
The mandate of the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation is derived from section 85(2) (b-c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa which states that the President exercises executive authority, together with the other members of the Cabinet, by developing and implementing national policy and coordinating the functions of state departments and administrations. In addition, the following policy documents outline the mandate of the Department:
LEGISLATION/POLICY
1. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
2. Proclamation no.47 of 2014
3. National Development Plan 2030-Our future make it work (2012)
4. Green Paper on National Strategic Planning (2009)
5. Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans
6. Policy framework for the Government-wide Monitoring and Evaluation Systems 2007)
7. Improving Government Performance: Our Approach (2009).
8. Cabinet decisions
The mandate of DPME has further been given concrete expression by the President in his 2010 and 2011 State of the Nation Addresses (SONA). The Minister for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation also outlined a clear set of political responses that should be weaved into the work of DPME. The APP therefore incorporate both the mandate and the political expectation on service delivery.
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
13
5) Overview of 2017/18 budget and MTEF estimates
5.1 Programme Budget structure
The Department has revised its programme budget structure based on the revised organisational structure as depicted in the table below:
PROGRAMME SUB-PROGRAMME
1. Administration
Purpose: Provide strategic leadership, management and support services to the department
1.1 Ministry
Purpose: Provide executive support to political principals
1.2 Departmental Management
Purpose: Provide strategic leadership and management to the department
1.3 Corporate Services and Financial Administration
Purpose: Render corporate services and financial administration to the department
2. National Planning Coordination
Purpose: Facilitate and coordinate macro and transversal planning across government and coordinate planning functions in the department
2.1 Management: National Planning Coordination
Purpose: Provide programme management and support services to the programme and the National Planning Commission
2.2 Planning Coordination
Purpose: Develop and implement planning frameworks and facilitate the alignment of the planning and budgeting functions across government and in the department.
2.3 Socio Economic Impact Assessment System
Purpose: Conduct socio-economic impact assessments
3. Sector Planning and Monitoring
Purpose: Ensure government policy coherence. Develop, facilitate, support and monitor the implementation of sector plans and intervention strategies
3.1 Management: Sector Planning and Monitoring
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme
3.2 Sector Planning, Monitoring and Intervention Support
Purpose: Support sector planning functions. Ensure government policy alignment in its goals. Facilitate, support and monitor the implementation of sector plans; and of intervention strategies in priority areas.
4. Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity Development
Purpose: Support the implementation of the NDP/medium term strategic framework by monitoring and improving the capacity of state institutions to develop and implement plans, and provide services.
4.1 Public Service Monitoring and Support
Purpose: Review, monitor and support the implementation of MTSF outcome 12 and implement strategic interventions to support and unblock implementation
4.2 Local Government Monitoring and Support
Purpose: Review, monitor and support the implementation of MTSF outcome 9 and implement strategic interventions to support and unblock implementation
4.3 Capacity Development
Purpose: Coordinate capacity development programmes to ensure effective development and application of PM&E policies, tools, systems and guidelines in government
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
14
PROGRAMME SUB-PROGRAMME
5. Frontline and Citizen Based Service Delivery Monitoring
Purpose: Facilitate service delivery improvements through frontline and citizen-based monitoring and effective complaints resolution systems
5.1 Management: Frontline and Citizen Based Service Delivery Mon-itoring
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme
5.2 Frontline and Citizen-based Service Delivery Monitoring and Complaints Resolution
Purpose: Expand frontline monitoring, citizen and community monitoring and complaints resolution systems capable of verifying government performance and implementing strategic interventions to improve performance
6. Evidence and Knowledge Systems
Purpose: Coordinate and support the generation, collation, accessibility and timely use of quality evidence to support performance monitoring and evaluation across government.
6.1 Management: Evidence and Knowledge Systems
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme
6.2 Evaluation, Research, Knowledge and Data Systems
Purpose: Provide evaluation, research, knowledge management and data integration and analysis services
7. National Youth Develop-ment
Purpose: Oversee youth development policy and its implementation. Transfer funds to the National Youth Development Agency.
7.1 Management: National Youth Development
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme
7.2 Youth Development Programmes
Purpose: Facilitate the development and implementation of national youth strategies and policies
7.3 National Youth Development Agency
Purpose: Oversee and transfer funds to the National Youth Development Agency.
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
15
5.2
Expe
ndit
ure
Esti
mat
es fo
r al
l pro
gram
mes
PR
OG
RA
MM
E A
UD
ITED
OU
TC
OM
EA
ENE
REV
ISED
ES
TIM
AT
EM
EDIU
M T
ERM
EX
PEN
DIT
UR
E ES
TIM
AT
ER
and
thou
sand
2013
/14
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
Adm
inis
trat
ion
87,
121
112
,318
1
12,9
32
136
,499
1
34,3
99
168
,305
1
84,5
10
197
,819
Nat
iona
l Pla
nnin
g C
oord
inat
ion
54,
570
82,
711
83,
624
90,
066
88,
981
54,
547
62,
400
66,
214
Sect
or P
lann
ing
and
Mon
itori
ng 3
4,50
9 3
3,93
7 3
2,90
7 4
3,07
8 3
8,27
8 5
2,15
3 5
7,91
1 6
0,95
5
Publ
ic S
ecto
r M
onito
ring
and
Cap
acity
D
evel
opm
ent
26,
513
29,
550
26,
088
29,
642
29,
642
40,
111
45,
951
48,
976
Fron
tline
and
Citi
zen-
base
d Se
rvic
e D
eliv
ery
Mon
itori
ng 3
9,15
2 3
9,84
1 4
7,06
1 5
4,27
9 5
3,07
9 5
6,96
3 6
0,88
4 6
5,49
3
Evid
ence
and
Kno
wle
dge
Syst
ems
31,
297
28,
883
30,
743
33,
841
33,
841
109
,421
6
1,15
1 6
0,55
9
Nat
iona
l You
th D
evel
opm
ent
397
,100
4
13,3
10
415
,422
4
10,2
57
410
,257
4
41,9
96
469
,682
4
95,8
54
Tota
l for
Pro
gram
mes
670
,262
7
40,5
50
748
,777
7
97,6
62
788
,477
92
3,49
6 94
2,48
9 99
5,87
0 Ec
onom
ic c
lass
ifica
tion
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts26
3,17
6 30
0,58
1 3
24,9
64
382
,916
3
73,7
31
471
,748
4
71,9
68
498
,191
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
138,
851
161,
141
176
,910
2
16,4
95
207
,310
2
68,9
37
312
,788
3
31,5
56
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
124,
325
139,
440
148
,054
1
66,4
21
166
,421
2
02,8
11
159
,180
1
66,6
35
Adv
ertis
ing
1,6
97
1,6
25
1,5
98
5,3
05
5,3
05
4,0
22
5,3
74
6,3
95
Aud
it co
sts:
Exte
rnal
2,4
92
2,9
69
2,1
68
2,8
00
2,8
00
2,6
00
2,7
00
2,8
00
Com
mun
icat
ion
(G&
S) 4
,484
4
,303
5
,585
5
,075
5
,075
5
,688
5
,641
5
,890
Com
pute
r se
rvic
es 1
9,86
3 2
1,10
1 2
3,48
5 2
5,18
8 2
5,18
8 2
4,36
5 2
6,78
5 2
8,50
6
Con
sulta
nts:
Busi
ness
and
adv
isor
y se
rvic
es 4
9,85
0 5
2,54
5 5
1,16
8 6
6,87
0 6
6,87
0 8
8,89
7 3
6,04
0 3
4,31
5
Ope
ratin
g le
ases
902
2
,852
6
,655
7
,061
7
,061
1
5,84
0 1
9,18
6 2
0,26
8
Trav
el a
nd s
ubsi
sten
ce 3
0,13
4 2
8,40
8 3
3,16
3 3
0,71
4 3
0,71
4 3
3,97
3 3
5,52
9 3
8,22
2
Ope
ratin
g pa
ymen
ts 5
,875
5
,553
6
,264
5
,613
5
,613
6
,393
6
,756
7
,067
Oth
er g
oods
and
ser
vice
s 9
,028
2
0,08
4 1
7,96
8 1
7,79
5 1
7,79
5 2
1,03
3 2
1,16
9 2
3,17
2
Tra
nsfe
rs a
nd s
ubsi
dies
392,
979
420,
577
410
,062
4
05,9
22
405
,922
4
32,8
06
457
,909
4
83,5
52
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 1
4,05
2 1
9,30
0 1
3,75
1 8
,824
8
,824
1
8,94
2 1
2,61
2 1
4,12
7 Bu
ildin
gs a
nd o
ther
fixe
d st
ruct
ures
-
8,6
76
435
1
17
117
4
,000
3
50
350
Mac
hine
ry a
nd e
quip
men
t 1
2,16
3 9
,493
1
1,89
2 7
,307
7
,307
1
3,29
2 1
0,60
2 1
1,80
7
Soft
war
e an
d ot
her
inta
ngib
le a
sset
s 1
,889
1
,131
1
,424
1
,400
1
,400
1
,650
1
,660
1
,970
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
55
92
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l eco
nom
ic c
lass
ifica
tion
670,
262
740,
550
748
,777
7
97,6
62
788
,477
9
23,4
96
942
,489
9
95,8
70
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
16
PART B
PROGRAMME AND SUB-PROGRAMME PLANS
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
18
6) Programme 1: Administration
The purpose of the programme is to provide strategic leadership, management and support services to the department
6.1 Programme Overview
The Administration Programme is comprised of the following three sub-programmes:
Ministry
The purpose of the programme is to provide executive support to political principals
The sub-programme is comprised of the offices of the Minister and the Deputy Minister
Departmental Management
Purpose: Provide strategic leadership and management to the department
The sub-programme comprises the Office of the Director General
Corporate Services and Financial Administration The purpose of the programme is to render corporate services and financial administration to the department
§ Chief Directorate: CD Strategy, HR and Auxiliary Services
§ Chief Directorate: Chief Financial Officer
§ Chief Directorate: Chief Information Officer
§ Chief Directorate: Marketing and Communications
§ Directorate: Risk, Anti-Corruption and Integrity Management
§ Directorate: Dir Internal Audit
6.2 Key Challenges
The key challenge for the programme is to implement the revised organizational structure and to sustain the clean audit outcomes for the past financial years.
6.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The Key focus for the programme will be:
§ Implementation of the revised organizational structure and recruitment of key personnel
§ Improving the quality of performance information
§ Maintain good financial management practices to sustain clean audit outcomes
§ Strengthen communication around the National Development Plan
Part B: Programme and Sub-Programme Plans
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
19
§ Development and maintenance of ICT infrastructure and integration of business application
§ Effective implementation of risk management and internal Audit processes to mitigate against potential performance lapses
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
20
6.4
Sub
-pro
gram
me:
Dep
artm
enta
l Man
agem
ent
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
1: D
epar
tmen
tal S
trat
egic
Pla
n O
bjec
tive
and
med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts fo
r 20
17/1
8–20
20/2
022
To p
rovi
de s
trat
egic
lead
ersh
ip, m
anag
emen
t an
d su
ppor
t se
rvic
es t
o th
e de
part
men
t
SUB
-PR
OG
RA
MM
E O
BJE
CT
IVES
STR
AT
EGIC
PL
AN
TA
RG
ET
(5-Y
EAR
TA
RG
ET)
AU
DIT
ED
/AC
TU
AL P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
EE
STIM
AT
ED
P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E
2017
-201
8
ME
DIU
M T
ER
M T
AR
GE
TS
2012
-13
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Str
ateg
y, H
R a
nd A
uxili
ary
Serv
ices
1.
To c
oord
inat
e th
e pr
ovis
ion
of s
trat
egy
and
orga
nisa
tiona
l de
velo
pmen
t se
rvic
es
Obt
ain
an
annu
al a
vera
ge
scor
e of
at
3 on
al
l Man
agem
ent
Perf
orm
ance
A
sses
smen
t Too
l (M
PAT
) K
RA
s
--
-O
btai
n a
n av
erag
e sc
ore
of a
t 3
on a
ll K
RA
for
MPA
T
Obt
ain
a n
aver
age
scor
e of
at
3 on
all
KR
A fo
r M
PAT
§O
btai
n a
n av
erag
e sc
ore
of a
t 3
on a
ll K
RA
for
MPA
T
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
per
form
ance
in
form
atio
n on
an
ann
ual b
asis
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
pe
rfor
man
ce
info
rmat
ion
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
pe
rfor
man
ce
info
rmat
ion
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
pe
rfor
man
ce
info
rmat
ion
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
per
form
ance
in
form
atio
n
§U
nqua
lified
au
dit
opin
ion
on p
erfo
rman
ce
info
rmat
ion
§U
nqua
lified
aud
it op
inio
n on
pe
rfor
man
ce in
form
atio
n
2.
To p
rovi
de
hum
an
reso
urce
m
anag
emen
t an
d de
velo
pmen
t se
rvic
es
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A b
y 30
Ju
ne o
f eac
h ye
ar
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A b
y 30
Ju
ne 2
013
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A b
y 30
Ju
ne 2
014
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A b
y 30
Ju
ne 2
015
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A
by 3
0 Ju
ne 2
016
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A
by 3
0 Ju
ne 2
017
HR
Pla
n fo
r de
velo
ped
and
subm
itted
to
DPS
A b
y 30
June
of e
ach
year
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Chi
ef F
inan
cial
Offi
cer
3.
To m
anag
e an
d fa
cilit
ate
the
prov
isio
n of
fina
ncia
l and
su
pply
cha
in
man
agem
ent
serv
ices
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
fina
ncia
l st
atem
ents
Unq
ualifi
ed
opin
ion
on
finan
cial
st
atem
ents
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
fin
anci
al
stat
emen
ts
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
fin
anci
al
stat
emen
ts
Unq
ualifi
ed a
udit
opin
ion
on fi
nanc
ial
stat
emen
ts
Unq
ualifi
ed
audi
t op
inio
n on
fina
ncia
l st
atem
ents
Unq
ualifi
ed a
udit
opin
ion
on fi
nanc
ial
stat
emen
ts
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
21
SUB
-PR
OG
RA
MM
E O
BJE
CT
IVES
STR
AT
EGIC
PL
AN
TA
RG
ET
(5-Y
EAR
TA
RG
ET)
AU
DIT
ED
/AC
TU
AL P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
EE
STIM
AT
ED
P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E
2017
-201
8
ME
DIU
M T
ER
M T
AR
GE
TS
2012
-13
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Chi
ef In
form
atio
n O
ffice
r
4.
To m
anag
e th
e pr
ovis
ion
of
info
rmat
ion,
co
mm
uni-
catio
n an
d te
chno
logy
m
anag
emen
t se
rvic
es
Dev
elop
, im
plem
ent
and
mon
itor
annu
al
ICT
pla
n
--
-Pr
oduc
e an
nual
ICT
plan
and
qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
indi
catin
g 85
% a
chie
vem
ent
of IC
T sy
stem
s st
anda
rds
Prod
uce
annu
al IC
T pl
an a
nd q
uart
erly
re
port
s in
dica
ting
80%
ach
ieve
men
t of
IC
T ta
rget
s in
the
pl
an
Prod
uce
annu
al IC
T pl
an a
nd q
uart
erly
re
port
s in
dica
ting
80%
ach
ieve
men
t of
bu
dget
s in
the
pla
n
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Mar
keti
ng a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns
5.
To p
rovi
de
mar
ketin
g, co
mm
unic
a-tio
n an
d st
ake-
hold
er li
aiso
n se
rvic
es t
o th
e D
epar
tmen
t
Dev
elop
impl
e-m
ent,
revi
ew
com
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
and
pl
an fo
r m
edia
en
gage
men
t, st
akeh
olde
r lia
ison
as
wel
l as
inte
rnal
sta
ff an
nual
ly
--
-D
evel
op/ r
evie
w
com
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
/pla
n fo
r m
edia
eng
agem
ent,
stak
ehol
der
liais
on
and
staf
f ann
ually
an
d m
onito
r im
plem
enta
tion
on a
qu
arte
rly
basi
s
Dev
elop
/ rev
iew
co
mm
unic
atio
n st
rate
gy/p
lan
for
med
ia e
ngag
emen
t, st
akeh
olde
r lia
ison
an
d st
aff a
nnua
lly
and
mon
itor
impl
emen
tatio
n on
a
quar
terl
y ba
sis
Dev
elop
/ rev
iew
com
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
/pl
an fo
r m
edia
eng
agem
ent,
stak
ehol
der
liais
on a
nd s
taff
annu
ally
and
mon
itor
impl
emen
tatio
n on
a q
uart
erly
bas
is
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Ris
k, A
nti-
corr
upti
on a
nd In
tegr
ity
Man
agem
ent
6.
To m
anag
e th
e pr
ovis
ion
of r
isk,
ant
i-co
rrup
tion
and
inte
grity
m
anag
emen
t se
rvic
es.
Con
duct
ann
ual
risk
ass
essm
ents
an
d m
onito
r im
plem
enta
tion
on a
qua
rter
ly
basi
s
Ris
k
asse
ssm
ent
cond
ucte
d an
d qu
arte
rly
impl
emen
ta-
tion
repo
rts
prod
uced
Ris
k
asse
ssm
ent
cond
ucte
d an
d qu
arte
rly
impl
emen
ta-
tion
repo
rts
prod
uced
Ris
k
asse
ssm
ent
cond
ucte
d an
d qu
arte
rly
impl
emen
ta-
tion
repo
rts
prod
uced
Ris
k as
sess
men
t co
nduc
ted
and
quar
terl
y im
plem
enta
tion
repo
rts
prod
uced
Con
duct
ann
ual
risk
ass
essm
ent
and
prod
uce
risk
m
anag
emen
t im
plem
enta
tion
plan
Con
duct
ann
ual r
isk a
sses
smen
t an
d pr
oduc
e ri
sk m
anag
emen
t im
plem
enta
tion
plan
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
22
SUB
-PR
OG
RA
MM
E O
BJE
CT
IVES
STR
AT
EGIC
PL
AN
TA
RG
ET
(5-Y
EAR
TA
RG
ET)
AU
DIT
ED
/AC
TU
AL P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
EE
STIM
AT
ED
P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
P
ER
FOR
MA
NC
E
2017
-201
8
ME
DIU
M T
ER
M T
AR
GE
TS
2012
-13
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Inte
rnal
Aud
it
7.
To m
anag
e th
e pr
ovis
ion
of
inte
rnal
aud
it se
rvic
es.
Prod
uce
an
annu
al 3
-yea
r ro
lling
str
ateg
ic
inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an a
nd s
ubm
it to
the
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
fo
r ap
prov
al b
y ag
reed
due
dat
e
Rol
ling
3-ye
ar
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al a
udit
plan
and
an
nual
aud
it pl
an a
ppro
ved
by A
udit
Com
mitt
ee
by 3
1
Dec
embe
r 20
13
3-ye
ar
stra
tegi
c ro
lling
in
tern
al
audi
t pl
an
and
annu
al
audi
t pl
an
prod
uced
and
su
bmitt
ed
for
appr
oval
by
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
by 31
Aug
ust
2013
3-ye
ar r
ollin
g st
rate
gic
inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an a
nd a
n an
nual
im-
plem
enta
tion
audi
t pl
an
prod
uced
and
su
bmitt
ed
for
appr
ov-
al b
y th
e A
udit
Com
-m
ittee
by
30
June
201
5
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
ro
lling
str
ateg
ic
inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an
and
subm
it to
the
A
udit
Com
mitt
ee
for
appr
oval
by
30
June
201
6
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
ro
lling
str
ateg
ic
inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an
and
subm
it to
the
A
udit
Com
mitt
ee
for
appr
oval
by
30
June
201
7
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
rol
ling
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al
audi
t pl
an a
nd s
ubm
it to
the
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
for
appr
oval
by
30 Ju
ne o
f ea
ch y
ear
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
23
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
AT
OR
/S
AU
DIT
ED/ A
CT
UA
L PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
EST
IMA
TED
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E/
TAR
GET
S
2017
-201
8
MED
IUM
TER
M T
AR
GET
S
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
1: T
o co
ordi
nate
the
pro
visi
on o
f str
ateg
y an
d or
gani
sati
onal
dev
elop
men
t se
rvic
es
1.
App
rove
d A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce P
lan
(APP
)
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
and
Ann
ual
Perf
orm
ance
Pl
an a
ppro
ved
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
and
Ann
ual
Perf
orm
ance
Pl
an a
ppro
ved
Ann
ual
Perf
orm
ance
Pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
Con
duct
ann
ual
revi
ew o
f Str
ateg
ic
Plan
s an
d A
PP a
s pr
escr
ibed
by
the
rele
vant
pla
nnin
g fr
amew
orks
Prod
uce
an A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
acc
ordi
ng t
o pr
escr
ibed
sta
ndar
ds
/fram
ewor
ks a
nd
timel
ines
Prod
uce
an A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
ac
cord
ing
to
pres
crib
ed
stan
dard
s /
fram
ewor
ks
and
timel
ines
Prod
uce
an A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
ac
cord
ing
to
pres
crib
ed
stan
dard
s /
fram
ewor
ks
and
timel
ines
Prod
uce
an A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
ac
cord
ing
to
pres
crib
ed
stan
dard
s /
fram
ewor
ks
and
timel
ines
2.
Num
ber
of q
uart
erly
im
plem
enta
tion
mon
itori
ng r
epor
ts
agai
nst A
PP
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
appr
oved
by
Exec
utin
g A
utho
rity
and
su
bmitt
ed
to N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
(N
T), b
ut
som
e w
ere
subm
itted
af
ter
30 d
ays
afte
r th
e en
d of
the
qua
rter
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
appr
oved
by
Exec
utin
g A
utho
rity
and
su
bmitt
ed
to N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
, but
so
me
wer
e su
bmitt
ed
afte
r 30
day
s af
ter
the
end
of t
he q
uart
er
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
appr
oved
by
Exec
utin
g A
utho
rity
and
su
bmitt
ed
to N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
w
ithin
30
days
fr
om t
he e
nd
of t
he q
uart
er
Qua
rter
ly re
port
s su
bmitt
ed t
o th
e Ex
ecut
ing
Aut
hori
ty,
Nat
iona
l Tre
asur
y an
d D
PME
with
in 3
0 da
ys
from
the
end
of t
he
quar
ter
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pe
rfor
man
ce
mon
itori
ng r
epor
t ag
ains
t APP
30
days
af
ter
end
of t
he
quar
ter
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pe
rfor
man
ce
mon
itori
ng
repo
rt
agai
nst A
PP
30 d
ays
afte
r en
d of
the
qu
arte
r
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pe
rfor
man
ce
mon
itori
ng
repo
rt
agai
nst A
PP
30 d
ays
afte
r en
d of
the
qu
arte
r
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pe
rfor
man
ce
mon
itori
ng
repo
rt
agai
nst A
PP
30 d
ays
afte
r en
d of
the
qu
arte
r
3.
Aud
ited
Ann
ual
Repo
rt (A
R)A
udite
d A
nnua
l R
epor
t (A
R)
appr
oved
and
su
bmitt
ed
to N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
and
Pa
rlia
men
t w
ithin
st
ipul
ated
tim
e fr
ames
Aud
ited
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
appr
oved
and
su
bmitt
ed
to N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
and
Pa
rlia
men
t w
ithin
st
ipul
ated
tim
e fr
ames
Aud
ited
Ann
ual R
epor
t ap
prov
ed a
nd
subm
itted
to
Nat
iona
l Tr
easu
ry a
nd
Parl
iam
ent
with
in
stip
ulat
ed t
ime
fram
es
Aud
ited
Ann
ual
Repo
rt a
ppro
ved
and
subm
itted
to
Nat
iona
l Tre
asur
y an
d Pa
rlia
men
t w
ithin
stip
ulat
ed t
ime
fram
es
Prod
uce
AR
and
su
bmit
to A
GSA
for
audi
t an
d to
NT
and
Pa
rlia
men
t by
due
da
tes
Prod
uce
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
in
acco
rdan
ce
with
pr
escr
ibed
fo
rmat
and
tim
elin
es
Prod
uce
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
in
acco
rdan
ce
with
pr
escr
ibed
fo
rmat
and
tim
elin
es
Prod
uce
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
in
acco
rdan
ce
with
pr
escr
ibed
fo
rmat
and
tim
elin
es
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
24
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
AT
OR
/S
AU
DIT
ED/ A
CT
UA
L PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
EST
IMA
TED
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E/
TAR
GET
S
2017
-201
8
MED
IUM
TER
M T
AR
GET
S
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
2: T
o pr
ovid
e hu
man
res
ourc
e m
anag
emen
t an
d de
velo
pmen
t se
rvic
es
4.
Perc
enta
ge o
f va
canc
ies
agai
nst
fund
ed p
osts
in
PERS
AL
over
a
quar
ter
(vac
ancy
ra
te)
Non
eLe
ss t
han
10%
on
ave
rage
ove
r th
e fu
ll fin
anci
al
year
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
th
e fu
ll fin
anci
al
year
Mai
ntai
n a
vaca
ncy
rate
of
10%
or
less
ann
ually
Mai
ntai
n a
vaca
ncy
rate
of
10%
or
less
ann
ually
Mai
ntai
n a
vaca
ncy
rate
of
10%
or
less
an
nual
ly
Ave
rage
pe
rcen
tage
of
fund
ed p
osts
in
PER
SAL
whi
ch a
re
vaca
nt o
ver
a qu
arte
r (v
acan
cy r
ate)
Ave
rage
pe
rcen
tage
of
fund
ed p
osts
in
PER
SAL
whi
ch a
re
vaca
nt o
ver
a qu
arte
r (v
acan
cy r
ate)
5.
Perc
enta
ge o
f int
erns
en
rolle
d ag
ains
t th
e fu
nded
pos
t
Non
eN
one
Non
e5%
or
mor
e (o
f the
ap
prov
ed fu
nded
pos
t es
tabl
ishm
ent)
of
inte
rns
are
appo
inte
d an
nual
ly in
th
e D
epar
tmen
t
5% o
r m
ore
(of t
he
appr
oved
fund
ed p
ost
esta
blish
men
t) o
f in
tern
s ar
e ap
poin
ted
annu
ally
in t
he
Dep
artm
ent
5% o
r m
ore
(of t
he
appr
oved
fu
nded
pos
t es
tabl
ishm
ent)
of
inte
rns
are
appo
inte
d an
nual
ly in
the
D
epar
tmen
t
Num
ber
of in
tern
s en
rolle
d on
an
annu
al b
asis
Num
ber
of in
tern
s en
rolle
d on
an
annu
al b
asis
6.
Perc
enta
ge o
f pe
rfor
man
ce
agre
emen
ts a
nd
repo
rts
subm
itted
on
time
Non
e10
0%A
chie
ve 9
0%
subm
issio
ns o
f pe
rfor
man
ce
agre
emen
ts,
revi
ews
and
asse
ssm
ents
by
due
date
s
Ach
ieve
90%
su
bmiss
ions
of
perf
orm
ance
ag
reem
ents
, rev
iew
s an
d as
sess
men
ts b
y du
e da
tes
Ach
ieve
90%
su
bmiss
ions
of
perf
orm
ance
ag
reem
ents
, rev
iew
s an
d as
sess
men
ts b
y du
e da
tes
Ach
ieve
90%
su
bmiss
ions
of
perf
orm
ance
ag
reem
ents
, re
view
s an
d as
sess
men
ts
by d
ue d
ates
Perc
enta
ge o
f pe
rfor
man
ce
agre
emen
ts
and
repo
rts
subm
itted
on
time
Perc
enta
ge o
f pe
rfor
man
ce
agre
emen
ts
and
repo
rts
subm
itted
on
time
7.
Perc
enta
ge
achi
evem
ent
of
targ
ets
in t
he
wor
kpla
ce s
kills
pla
n ac
hiev
ed
Ach
ieve
80%
of
targ
ets
in t
he
WSP
by
the
end
of e
ach
the
finan
cial
yea
r
Ach
ieve
80%
of
targ
ets
in t
he
WSP
by
the
end
of e
ach
the
finan
cial
yea
r
Ach
ieve
80%
of t
arge
ts
in t
he W
SP b
y th
e en
d of
eac
h th
e fin
anci
al
year
Ach
ieve
80%
of t
arge
ts
in t
he W
SP b
y th
e en
d of
the
fina
ncia
l yea
r
Ach
ieve
80%
of
tar
gets
in
the
WSP
by
the
end
of
eac
h th
e fin
anci
al y
ear
Ach
ieve
80%
of
tar
gets
in
the
WSP
by
the
end
of
eac
h th
e fin
anci
al y
ear
Ach
ieve
80%
of
tar
gets
in
the
WSP
by
the
end
of
eac
h th
e fin
anci
al y
ear
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
25
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
AT
OR
/S
AU
DIT
ED/ A
CT
UA
L PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
EST
IMA
TED
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E/
TAR
GET
S
2017
-201
8
MED
IUM
TER
M T
AR
GET
S
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
8.
Perc
enta
ge o
f SM
S m
embe
rs s
ubm
ittin
g fin
anci
al d
isclo
sure
s
Non
eN
one
Non
e10
0% c
ompl
ianc
e in
sub
miss
ion
of
finan
cial
inte
rest
s by
all
desig
nate
d em
ploy
ees
with
in t
he s
peci
fied
time
fram
es
100%
com
plia
nce
in s
ubm
issio
n of
fin
anci
al in
tere
sts
by a
ll de
signa
ted
empl
oyee
s w
ithin
the
spe
cifie
d tim
e fr
ames
100%
co
mpl
ianc
e in
sub
miss
ion
of fi
nanc
ial
inte
rest
s by
al
l des
igna
ted
empl
oyee
s w
ithin
the
sp
ecifi
ed t
ime
fram
es
Perc
enta
ge o
f SM
S m
embe
rs
subm
ittin
g fin
anci
al
disc
losu
res
Non
e
Stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ive
4: T
o m
anag
e an
d fa
cilit
ate
the
prov
isio
n of
fina
ncia
l and
sup
ply
chai
n m
anag
emen
t se
rvic
es
9.
Perc
enta
ge o
f va
lid in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys a
nd
case
s w
here
non
-co
mpl
ianc
e le
ads
to
disc
iplin
ary
actio
n
New
N
ew
New
A
ll va
lid in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys10
0% o
f val
id in
voic
es
paid
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
r di
scip
linar
y ac
tion
take
n in
100
% o
f cas
es w
here
in
voic
es a
re n
ot p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys
100%
of v
alid
in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys
or d
iscip
linar
y ac
tion
take
n in
100
% o
f ca
ses
whe
re
invo
ices
are
no
t pa
id
with
in 3
0 da
ys
Perc
enta
ge o
f va
lid in
voic
es
paid
with
in 3
0 da
ys a
nd c
ases
w
here
non
-co
mpl
ianc
e le
ads
to
disc
iplin
ary
actio
n
Non
e
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
5: T
o m
anag
e th
e pr
ovis
ion
of in
form
atio
n, c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d te
chno
logy
man
agem
ent
serv
ices
10. A
ppro
ved
ICT
Plan
98%
sys
tem
s av
aila
bilit
y ac
hiev
ed
App
rove
d bu
sines
s ap
plic
atio
ns
plan
Busin
ess
appl
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
the
CIO
by
30 Ju
ne 2
014
Busin
ess
appl
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
the
CIO
Ann
ual I
CT
Plan
pr
oduc
ed a
nd a
ppro
ved
by t
he C
IO b
y 30
June
Ann
ual I
CT
Plan
pro
duce
d an
d ap
prov
ed
by t
he C
IO b
y 30
June
Ann
ual I
CT
Plan
pro
duce
d an
d ap
prov
ed
by t
he C
IO b
y 30
June
Ann
ual I
CT
Plan
pro
duce
d an
d ap
prov
ed
by t
he C
IO b
y 30
June
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
26
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
AT
OR
/S
AU
DIT
ED/ A
CT
UA
L PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
EST
IMA
TED
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E/
TAR
GET
S
2017
-201
8
MED
IUM
TER
M T
AR
GET
S
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
11. P
erce
ntag
e ac
hiev
emen
t of
ta
rget
s in
the
ICT
Plan
80%
of
activ
ities
in p
lan
impl
emen
ted
by
the
end
of t
he
finan
cial
yea
r
80%
of a
ctiv
ities
in
the
ICT
plan
im
plem
ente
d by
th
e en
d of
the
fin
anci
al y
ear
80%
of a
ctiv
ities
in
the
ICT
plan
im
plem
ente
d by
th
e en
d of
the
fin
anci
al y
ear
80%
of a
ctiv
ities
in t
he
ICT
plan
impl
emen
ted
by t
he e
nd o
f the
fin
anci
al y
ear
Prod
uce
quar
terly
m
onito
ring
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e IC
T pl
an
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
f end
of
the
quar
ter
Prod
uce
quar
terly
m
onito
ring
re
port
s ag
ains
t th
e IC
T pl
an
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
f end
of
the
quar
ter
show
ing
80 p
erce
nt
achi
evem
ent
of t
arge
ts in
th
e Pl
an
Prod
uce
quar
terly
m
onito
ring
re
port
s ag
ains
t th
e IC
T pl
an
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
f end
of
the
quar
ter
show
ing
80 p
erce
nt
achi
evem
ent
of t
arge
ts in
th
e Pl
an
Prod
uce
quar
terly
m
onito
ring
re
port
s ag
ains
t th
e IC
T pl
an
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
f end
of
the
quar
ter
show
ing
80 p
erce
nt
achi
evem
ent
of t
arge
ts in
th
e Pl
an
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
6: T
o pr
ovid
e m
arke
ting
, com
mun
icat
ion
and
stak
ehol
der
liais
on s
ervi
ces
to t
he D
epar
tmen
t
12. A
ppro
ved
annu
al
com
mun
icat
ion
plan
Com
mun
i-ca
tion
plan
ap
prov
ed b
y th
e D
G a
nd
quar
terl
y pr
og-
ress
rep
orts
pr
oduc
ed
80%
of
com
mun
icat
ion
activ
ities
de
scri
bed
in
com
mun
icat
ion
plan
im
plem
ente
d by
the
end
of
the
finan
cial
ye
ar
Ann
ual
com
mun
icat
ion
plan
app
rove
d by
DG
by
30
Apr
il 20
14
App
rove
d an
nual
co
mm
unic
atio
n pl
an
and
quar
terl
y re
port
s on
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e pl
an
Ann
ual
Com
mun
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
head
of
Com
mun
icat
ions
by
30
June
incl
udin
g co
mm
unic
atio
n on
pr
ogre
ss w
ith N
DP
Ann
ual C
om-
mun
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
hea
d of
C
omm
unic
a-tio
ns b
y 30
Ju
ne in
clud
ing
com
mun
i-ca
tion
on
prog
ress
with
N
DP
Ann
ual C
om-
mun
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
hea
d of
C
omm
unic
a-tio
ns b
y 30
Ju
ne in
clud
ing
com
mun
i-ca
tion
on
prog
ress
with
N
DP
Ann
ual C
om-
mun
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
hea
d of
C
omm
unic
a-tio
ns b
y 30
Ju
ne in
clud
ing
com
mun
i-ca
tion
on
prog
ress
with
N
DP
13. P
erce
ntag
e ac
hiev
emen
t of
ta
rget
s in
the
C
omm
unic
atio
n Pl
an
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
80%
of c
omm
unic
atio
n ac
tiviti
es d
escr
ibed
in
the
com
mun
icat
ion
plan
impl
emen
ted
by
the
end
of t
he fi
nanc
ial
year
80%
of c
om-
mun
icat
ion
activ
ities
in
the
com
mu-
nica
tion
plan
im
plem
ente
d by
the
end
of
the
finan
cial
ye
ar
80%
of c
om-
mun
icat
ion
activ
ities
in
the
com
mu-
nica
tion
plan
im
plem
ente
d by
the
end
of
the
finan
cial
ye
ar
80%
of c
om-
mun
icat
ion
activ
ities
in
the
com
mu-
nica
tion
plan
im
plem
ente
d by
the
end
of
the
finan
cial
ye
ar
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
: To
man
age
the
prov
isio
n of
ris
k, a
nti-
corr
upti
on a
nd in
tegr
ity
man
agem
ent
serv
ices
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
27
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E IN
DIC
AT
OR
/S
AU
DIT
ED/ A
CT
UA
L PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
EST
IMA
TED
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE
2016
-201
7
PLA
NN
ED
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E/
TAR
GET
S
2017
-201
8
MED
IUM
TER
M T
AR
GET
S
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
14. A
ppro
ved
Risk
M
anag
emen
t Re
gist
er
App
rove
d R
isk
Reg
iste
rA
ppro
ved
Ris
k R
egis
ter
App
rove
d R
isk
Reg
iste
rA
ppro
ved
Ris
k R
egis
ter
Con
duct
ann
ual r
isk
asse
ssm
ents
and
pr
oduc
e an
nual
risk
pla
n an
d qu
arte
rly p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
Con
duct
an
nual
risk
as
sess
men
ts
and
prod
uce
annu
al r
isk
plan
and
qua
r-te
rly p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
Con
duct
an
nual
risk
as
sess
men
ts
and
prod
uce
annu
al r
isk
plan
and
qua
r-te
rly p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
Con
duct
an
nual
risk
as
sess
men
ts
and
prod
uce
annu
al r
isk
plan
and
qua
r-te
rly p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
15. Q
uart
erly
risk
m
anag
emen
t re
port
sQ
uart
erly
re
port
s pr
oduc
ed
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
prod
uced
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
prod
uced
Qua
rter
ly r
epor
ts
prod
uced
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pro
gres
s re
port
s ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
risk
pla
n
Prod
uce
quar
-te
rly p
rog-
ress
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
ri
sk p
lan
Prod
uce
quar
-te
rly p
rog-
ress
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
ri
sk p
lan
Prod
uce
quar
-te
rly p
rog-
ress
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
ri
sk p
lan
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
: To
man
age
the
prov
isio
n of
inte
rnal
aud
it s
ervi
ces.
16. A
ppro
ved
thre
e ye
ar
rolli
ng In
tern
al A
udit
Plan
Rolli
ng 3
-yea
r st
rate
gic
inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an a
nd
annu
al a
udit
plan
app
rove
d by
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
by
31 M
ay 2
014
Rolli
ng 3
-yea
r st
rate
gic
inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an a
nd
annu
al a
udit
plan
app
rove
d by
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
by
31
Dec
embe
r 20
15
3-ye
ar
stra
tegi
c ro
lling
inte
rnal
au
dit
plan
and
an
nual
aud
it pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
subm
itted
fo
r ap
prov
al
by A
udit
Com
mitt
ee b
y
31 A
ugus
t 20
16
3-ye
ar r
ollin
g st
rate
gic
inte
rnal
au
dit
plan
and
an
annu
al
impl
emen
tatio
n au
dit
plan
pro
duce
d an
d su
bmitt
ed fo
r ap
prov
al b
y th
e A
udit
Com
mitt
ee b
y 30
June
201
6
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
rol
ling
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al a
udit
plan
and
sub
mit
to t
he
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
for
appr
oval
by
30 Ju
ne
2017
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
rol
ling
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al
audi
t pl
an
and
subm
it to
the
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
fo
r ap
prov
al
by 3
0 Ju
ne
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
rol
ling
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al
audi
t pl
an
and
subm
it to
the
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
fo
r ap
prov
al
by 3
0 Ju
ne
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
rol
ling
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al
audi
t pl
an
and
subm
it to
the
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
fo
r ap
prov
al
by 3
0 Ju
ne
17. Q
uart
erly
Inte
rnal
A
udit
(IA)R
epor
tQ
uart
erly
pr
ogre
ss
repo
rts
prod
uced
Qua
rter
ly
prog
ress
re
port
s pr
oduc
ed
Qua
rter
ly
prog
ress
re
port
s pr
oduc
ed
Qua
rter
ly p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
prod
uced
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pro
gres
s re
port
s ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
risk
pla
n
Prod
uce
quar
-te
rly p
rog-
ress
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
ri
sk p
lan
Prod
uce
quar
-te
rly p
rog-
ress
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
ri
sk p
lan
Prod
uce
quar
-te
rly p
rog-
ress
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
ri
sk p
lan
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
28
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gra
mm
e P
erfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r Q
uar
terl
y T
arge
ts (2
017/
18)
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(A
pr-
June
)2n
d
(Jul
y-Se
pt)
3rd
(O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(J
an-M
arch
)
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Str
ateg
y, H
R a
nd A
uxili
ary
Serv
ices
1.
App
rove
d A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
(APP
)
Prod
uce
an A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
acc
ordi
ng t
o pr
escr
ibed
sta
ndar
ds
/fram
ewor
ks a
nd
timel
ines
Qua
rter
lySi
gned
-off
APP
and
/or
str
ateg
ic p
lan
Revi
ew a
nd
prod
uce
1st
draf
t of
str
ateg
ic p
lan
and
APP
and
su
bmit
to N
T an
d D
PME
Revi
ew a
nd
prod
uce
2nd
draf
t of
str
ateg
ic
plan
and
APP
and
su
bmit
to N
T an
d D
PME
Fina
l str
ateg
ic
plan
and
APP
ta
bled
to P
arlia
men
t by
du
e da
te s
et b
y Pa
rlia
men
t
2.
Num
ber
of
quar
terly
im
plem
enta
tion
mon
itori
ng
repo
rts
agai
nst
APP
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pe
rfor
man
ce
mon
itori
ng r
epor
t ag
ains
t APP
30
days
af
ter
end
of t
he
quar
ter
Qua
rter
lyA
ppro
ved
quar
terly
re
port
s
alig
ned
to t
he A
PP
targ
ets
4th
quar
ter
perf
orm
ance
re
port
for
2017
/18
prod
uced
and
ap
prov
ed b
y th
e M
inist
er a
nd
subm
itted
to
NT
1st
quar
ter
perf
orm
ance
re
port
for
2017
/18
prod
uced
and
ap
prov
ed b
y th
e M
inist
er a
nd
subm
itted
to
NT
2nd
quar
ter
perf
orm
ance
re
port
for
2017
/18
prod
uced
an
d ap
prov
ed b
y th
e M
inist
er a
nd
subm
itted
to
NT
3rd
quar
ter
perf
orm
ance
re
port
for
2017
/18
prod
uced
and
ap
prov
ed b
y th
e M
inist
er a
nd
subm
itted
to
NT
3.
Aud
ited
Ann
ual
Repo
rtPr
oduc
e an
Ann
ual
Perf
orm
ance
Pl
an a
ccor
ding
to
pres
crib
ed s
tand
ards
/fr
amew
orks
and
tim
elin
es
Ann
ually
Aud
ited
Ann
ual
Repo
rtA
nnua
l Rep
ort
subm
itted
to
Aud
itor-
Gen
eral
by
31 M
ay 2
017
Aud
ited
Ann
ual
Repo
rt p
rodu
ced
and
subm
itted
to
Nat
iona
l Tre
asur
y an
d Pa
rlia
men
t by
du
e da
te
--
4.
Perc
enta
ge
of v
acan
cies
ag
ains
t fu
nded
po
sts
in
PERS
AL
over
a
quar
ter
(vac
ancy
rat
e)
Mai
ntai
n a
vaca
ncy
rate
of
10%
or
less
ann
ually
Qua
rter
lyPE
RSA
L
Esta
blish
men
t
Repo
rt
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
5.
Perc
enta
ge o
f in
tern
s en
rolle
d ag
ains
t th
e fu
nded
pos
t
5% o
r m
ore
(of t
he
appr
oved
fund
ed p
ost
esta
blish
men
t) o
f in
tern
s ar
e ap
poin
ted
annu
ally
in t
he
Dep
artm
ent
Ann
ually
PERS
AL
repo
rts
and
man
ual d
ata
base
--
-5%
or
mor
e (o
f th
e ap
prov
ed
fund
ed p
ost
esta
blish
men
t)
of in
tern
s ap
poin
ted
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
29
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(A
pr-
June
)2n
d
(Jul
y-Se
pt)
3rd
(O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(J
an-M
arch
)
6.
Perc
enta
ge o
f pe
rfor
man
ce
agre
emen
ts
and
repo
rts
subm
itted
on
time
Ach
ieve
90%
su
bmiss
ions
of
perf
orm
ance
ag
reem
ents
, rev
iew
s an
d as
sess
men
ts b
y du
e da
tes
Qua
rter
lyPM
Ds A
sses
smen
t Re
port
90%
of a
gree
men
ts
conc
lude
d an
d su
bmitt
ed t
o H
R by
31
May
201
7
90%
of p
revi
ous
year
ass
essm
ents
m
oder
ated
and
resu
lts
com
mun
icat
ed b
y 30
Sep
tem
ber
2017
90%
of m
id-t
erm
pe
rfor
man
ce
revi
ews
conc
lude
d by
31
Oct
ober
201
7
90%
of d
raft
perf
orm
ance
ag
reem
ents
su
bmitt
ed t
o H
R by
30
Apr
il 20
18
7.
Perc
enta
ge
achi
evem
ent
of
targ
ets
in t
he
wor
kpla
ce s
kills
pl
an a
chie
ved
Ach
ieve
80%
of t
arge
ts
in t
he W
SP b
y th
e en
d of
the
fina
ncia
l yea
r
Ann
ually
Fina
ncia
l D
isclo
sure
s
e-fil
ling
Syst
em
Repo
rts
100%
--
-
8.
Perc
enta
ge o
f SM
S m
embe
rs
subm
ittin
g fin
anci
al
disc
losu
res
100%
com
plia
nce
in s
ubm
issio
n of
fin
anci
al in
tere
sts
by a
ll de
signa
ted
empl
oyee
s w
ithin
the
spe
cifie
d tim
e fr
ames
Qua
rter
lyPE
RSA
L
Esta
blish
men
t
Repo
rt
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
10%
or
less
on
aver
age
over
the
qu
arte
r
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Chi
ef F
inan
cial
Offi
cer
9.
Perc
enta
ge o
f va
lid in
voic
es
paid
with
in 3
0 da
ys a
nd c
ases
w
here
non
-co
mpl
ianc
e le
ads
to
disc
iplin
ary
actio
n
100%
of v
alid
invo
ices
pa
id w
ithin
30
days
or
disc
iplin
ary
actio
n ta
ken
in 1
00%
of c
ases
w
here
invo
ices
are
not
pa
id w
ithin
30
days
Mon
thly
Exce
ptio
n re
port
on
pay
men
t of
sup
plie
rs
subm
itted
to
AO
and
Nat
iona
l Tr
easu
ry
100%
of v
alid
in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
r di
scip
linar
y ac
tion
take
n in
100
%
of c
ases
whe
re
invo
ices
are
not
pa
id w
ithin
30
days
100%
of v
alid
in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
r di
scip
linar
y ac
tion
take
n in
100
%
of c
ases
whe
re
invo
ices
are
not
pa
id w
ithin
30
days
100%
of v
alid
in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys
or d
isci
plin
ary
actio
n ta
ken
in
100%
of c
ases
w
here
invo
ices
ar
e no
t pa
id
with
in 3
0 da
ys
100%
of v
alid
in
voic
es p
aid
with
in 3
0 da
ys
or d
isci
plin
ary
actio
n ta
ken
in
100%
of c
ases
w
here
invo
ices
ar
e no
t pa
id
with
in 3
0 da
ys
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Chi
ef In
form
atio
n O
ffice
r
10. A
ppro
ved
ICT
Plan
Ann
ual I
CT
Plan
pr
oduc
ed a
nd a
ppro
ved
by h
ead
of IC
T by
30
June
Ann
ually
A
ppro
ved
ICT
Plan
Pr
oduc
e A
nnua
l IC
T by
30
June
--
-
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
30
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(A
pr-
June
)2n
d
(Jul
y-Se
pt)
3rd
(O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(J
an-M
arch
)
11. P
erce
ntag
e ac
hiev
emen
t of
ta
rget
s in
the
IC
T Pl
an
Prod
uce
quar
terly
m
onito
ring
rep
orts
ag
ains
t th
e IC
T pl
an
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
f end
of
the
qua
rter
Qua
rter
ly
Qua
rter
ly r
epor
ts
of IC
T sy
stem
s st
anda
rds
Prod
uce
quar
terly
re
port
Ann
ual
com
mun
icat
ions
re
port
Prod
uce
quar
terly
re
port
Prod
uce
quar
terly
re
port
Prod
uce
quar
terly
rep
ort
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Mar
keti
ng a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns12
. App
rove
d an
nual
co
mm
unic
atio
n pl
an
Ann
ual
Com
mun
icat
ions
pl
an p
rodu
ced
and
appr
oved
by
head
of
Com
mun
icat
ions
by
30
June
incl
udin
g co
mm
unic
atio
n on
pr
ogre
ss w
ith N
DP
Ann
ually
A
ppro
ved
plan
Prod
uce
annu
al
com
mun
icat
ion
plan
by
30
June
--
-
13. P
erce
ntag
e ac
hiev
emen
t of
ta
rget
s in
the
C
omm
unic
atio
n Pl
an
80%
of
com
mun
icat
ion
activ
ities
des
crib
ed in
co
mm
unic
atio
n pl
an
impl
emen
ted
by t
he
end
of t
he fi
nanc
ial
year
Qua
rter
lyQ
uart
erly
pro
gres
s re
port
sPr
oduc
e qu
arte
rly
repo
rt A
nnua
l co
mm
unic
atio
ns
repo
rt
Prod
uce
quar
terly
re
port
Prod
uce
quar
terly
re
port
Prod
uce
quar
terly
rep
ort
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Ris
k, A
nti-
corr
upti
on a
nd In
tegr
ity
Man
agem
ent
14. A
ppro
ved
Risk
M
anag
emen
t Re
gist
er
Con
duct
ann
ual
risk
ass
essm
ents
an
d pr
oduc
e an
nual
ri
sk p
lan
and
quar
terly
pro
gres
s re
port
s
Ann
ually
Risk
impl
emen
tatio
n pl
an
Upd
ated
risk
reg
ister
Prod
uce
risk
re
gist
er a
nd p
lan
for
the
finan
cial
yea
r 20
17/1
8
--
-
15. Q
uart
erly
risk
m
anag
emen
t re
port
s
Prod
uce
quar
terly
pro
gres
s re
port
s ag
ains
t th
e ta
rget
s in
the
risk
pla
n
Qua
rter
lyQ
uart
erly
pro
gres
s re
port
s4th
qua
rter
risk
pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t fo
r 20
16/1
7 pr
oduc
ed
1st q
uart
er r
isk
prog
ress
rep
ort
prod
uced
2nd q
uart
er r
isk
prog
ress
rep
ort
prod
uced
3rd q
uart
er r
isk
prog
ress
rep
ort
prod
uced
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
31
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(A
pr-
June
)2n
d
(Jul
y-Se
pt)
3rd
(O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(J
an-M
arch
)
Sub-
prog
ram
me:
Inte
rnal
Aud
it
16. A
ppro
ved
thre
e ye
ar r
ollin
g In
tern
al A
udit
Plan
Prod
uce
a 3-
year
rol
ling
stra
tegi
c in
tern
al a
udit
plan
and
sub
mit
to t
he
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
for
appr
oval
by
30 Ju
ne
2017
Ann
ually
Inte
rnal
aud
it pl
an
Qua
rter
ly p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
Min
utes
of A
udit
Dev
elop
3-y
ear
stra
tegi
c an
d an
nual
pl
an a
nd s
ubm
it to
A
udit
Com
mitt
ee
for
appr
oval
by
30 Ju
ne 2
016
--
-
17. Q
uart
erly
In
tern
al A
udit
repo
rt
Qua
rter
ly a
udit
impl
emen
tatio
n re
port
s pr
esen
ted
to
Aud
it C
omm
ittee
and
M
anag
emen
t pr
oduc
ed
Qua
rter
lyQ
uart
erly
rep
orts
an
d m
inut
es
indi
catin
g th
at t
he
repo
rts
serv
ed in
th
e A
C
4th
quar
ter
Inte
rnal
A
udit
prog
ress
re
port
pro
duce
d
1st
quar
ter
inte
rnal
aud
it pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t pr
oduc
ed
2nd q
uart
er
inte
rnal
aud
it pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t pr
oduc
ed
3rd q
uart
er
inte
rnal
aud
it pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t pr
oduc
ed
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
32
6.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Aud
ited
Out
com
eA
ene
Rev
ised
Es
tim
ate
Med
ium
Ter
m E
xpen
ditu
re E
stim
ate
Ran
d th
ousa
nd20
13/1
420
14/1
520
15/1
620
16/1
720
16/1
720
17/1
820
18/1
920
19/2
0
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Min
istr
y 2
3,66
7 3
1,40
3 3
6,04
5 3
7,14
8 3
7,14
8 3
5,34
7 3
6,53
5 3
8,51
2
Dep
artm
enta
l Man
agem
ent
9,1
78
8,8
63
5,0
49
4,3
80
2,4
80
5,6
27
5,8
63
6,1
70
Cor
pora
te S
ervi
ces
and
Fina
ncia
l A
dmin
istr
atio
n 5
4,27
6 7
2,05
2 7
1,83
8 9
4,97
1 9
4,77
1 1
27,3
31
142
,112
1
53,1
37
Tota
l 8
7,12
1 1
12,3
18
112
,932
1
36,4
99
134
,399
1
68,3
05
184
,510
1
97,8
19
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
onC
urre
nt p
aym
ents
75,
261
94,
036
104
,603
1
29,4
81
127
,381
1
51,8
35
174
,380
1
86,4
84
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
43,
996
53,
811
53,
817
67,
665
65,
565
82,
018
97,
201
103
,186
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
31,
265
40,
225
50,
786
61,
816
61,
816
69,
817
77,
179
83,
298
Tra
nsfe
rs a
nd s
ubsi
dies
135
3
60
129
3
2 3
2 -
-
-
Pa
ymen
ts fo
r ca
pita
l ass
ets
11,
674
17,
832
8,2
00
6,9
86
6,9
86
16,
470
10,
130
11,
335
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
51
90
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 8
7,12
1 1
12,3
18
112
,932
1
36,4
99
134
,399
1
68,3
05
184
,510
1
97,8
19
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
33
7) Programme 2: National Planning Coordination
7.1 Purpose of the programme
The purpose of the National Planning Coordination branch is to facilitate and coordinate macro and transversal planning across government and coordinate planning functions in the department. The key objective of the programme is to institutionalise planning across government by providing guidance on short, medium and long term planning to support the implementation of the National Development Plan Vision 2030. In addition, the programme also support the work of the National Planning Commission (NPC).
The programme is comprised of the following three sub-programmes:
Management: National Planning Coordination
Purpose: Provide programme management and support services to the programme and the National Planning Commission.
Planning Coordination
Purpose: Develop and implement planning frameworks and facilitate the alignment of the planning and budgeting functions across government and in the department.
Socio Economic Impact Assessment System
Purpose: Facilitate socio-economic impact assessments.
7.2 Key Challenges
The programme need to ensure that planning processes contributes towards better plans, greater policy coherence and clear articulation of long term goals and aspirations. Plans also needs to be informed by evidence. Increasing the use of data is likely to be one of the most effective ways of improving the quality of plans that are produced. To this end, greater cooperation between the Department and StatsSA will ensure that National, Provincial and Local government planning processes are data informed and driven.
The Department has been unable to deliver on key priorities due to capacity constraints.
7.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The focus of the department in the financial year 2017-18 will be on:
§ Finalise framework on the institutionalisation of long term planning;
§ Finalise the revision of planning frameworks and ensure alignment of strategic plans, annual performance plans and MTEF budget allocations to MTSF priorities;
§ Work with the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) to finalise the transfer of the spatial planning function to the DPME;
§ Development of a national spatial development framework (NSDF) with support from the NPC and guide the development of sub-frameworks;
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
34
§ Build the capability to develop sector specific plans aligned to the NDP in partnership with relevant sectors;
§ Work with National Treasury to ensure that national budget is directed towards the NDP/MTSF priorities;
§ Conduct socio-economic impact assessments on new and existing legislation and regulations to ensure alignment with the NDP and mitigation of unintended consequences of new policies;
§ Support the development and implementation of detailed 3-feet plans in key priority areas.
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
35
7.4
Pro
gram
me
2: N
atio
nal P
lann
ing
Coo
rdin
atio
n
Pur
pose
of
the
Pro
gram
me:
To
faci
litat
e an
d co
ordi
nate
mac
ro a
nd t
rans
vers
al p
lann
ing
acro
ss g
over
nmen
t an
d co
ordi
nate
pla
nnin
g fu
nctio
ns in
the
de
part
men
t
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Obj
ecti
ve: P
lans
, pol
icie
s an
d bu
dget
s of
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtm
ents
and
ent
ities
are
alig
ned
and
supp
ort
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
ND
P
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
2: S
trat
egic
obj
ecti
ve a
nd m
ediu
m t
erm
tar
gets
for
2016
/17
– 20
18/1
9
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
s
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
Targ
et (
5-ye
ar
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
per
form
ance
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Per
form
ance
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-14
2014
-201
520
15-2
016
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
1.
To fa
cilit
ate
long
-ter
m
plan
ning
, al
ignm
ent
of b
udge
t al
loca
tions
an
d sh
ort
term
pla
ns a
nd
deve
lop
plan
ning
fr
amew
orks
Dev
elop
a
fram
ewor
k ou
tlini
ng
appr
oach
es t
o in
stitu
tiona
lisat
ion
of lo
ng t
erm
pl
anni
ng in
go
vern
men
t
--
-C
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith g
over
nmen
t de
part
men
ts
on a
dis
cuss
ion
docu
men
t on
ap
proa
ches
to
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
long
ter
m
plan
ning
, in
corp
orat
ing
a fr
amew
ork
for
spat
ial p
lann
ing
Fram
ewor
k on
th
e in
stitu
-tio
naliz
atio
n of
pla
nnin
g fin
alis
ed
Pilo
t im
ple-
men
tatio
n of
th
e fr
ame-
wor
k
Rev
ise
fram
e-w
ork
Rol
l-out
im
plem
enta
-tio
n of
the
fr
amew
ork
Nat
iona
l Sp
atia
l D
evel
opm
ent
Fram
ewor
k (N
SDF)
de
velo
ped
Sect
or p
lans
pr
oduc
ed o
n st
rate
gic
sect
ors
such
wat
er a
nd
ener
gy
--
-D
raft
wat
er
sect
or p
lan
deve
lope
d
Wat
er s
ecto
r pl
an fi
nalis
ed
by D
ecem
ber
2017
Iden
tify
and
supp
ort
1 Se
ctor
Pla
n
Iden
tify
and
supp
ort
1 Se
ctor
Pla
n
Iden
tify
and
supp
ort
1 Se
ctor
Pla
n
2.
To e
nsur
e th
at n
atio
nal
budg
et p
roce
ss
is in
form
ed
by p
rior
ities
id
entifi
ed
annu
ally
for
gove
rnm
ent
plan
s
Dev
elop
ann
ual
budg
et m
anda
te
pape
r to
info
rm
the
budg
et
--
-A
nnua
l bud
get
man
date
pap
er
prod
uced
by
end
of A
pril
Ann
ual
budg
et
man
date
pa
per
prod
uced
by
end
of A
pril
Ann
ual
budg
et
man
date
pa
per
prod
uced
by
end
of A
pril
Ann
ual
budg
et
man
date
pa
per
prod
uced
by
end
of A
pril
Ann
ual
budg
et
man
date
pa
per
prod
uced
by
end
of A
pril
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
36
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
s
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
Targ
et (
5-ye
ar
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
per
form
ance
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Per
form
ance
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-14
2014
-201
520
15-2
016
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
3.
Ann
ual r
epor
t de
taili
ng N
PC
stak
ehol
der
enga
gem
ent
on
the
ND
P
Ann
ual r
epor
t on
sta
keho
lder
en
gage
men
ts a
nd
the
wor
k of
the
N
PC p
rodu
ced
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
on
activ
ities
of t
he
NPC
4.
Res
ults
bas
ed
plan
ning
in
stitu
tiona
lised
in
the
nat
iona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
sp
here
s of
go
vern
men
t
Rol
l out
of
rev
ised
Fr
amew
ork
for
impl
emen
tatio
n by
dep
artm
ents
an
d pu
blic
ent
ities
--
-Re
vise
d fr
ame-
wor
k fo
r st
ra-
tegi
c an
d an
nual
pe
rfor
man
ce p
lans
pr
oduc
ed.
Revi
sion
of
the
revi
sed
fram
ewor
k fo
r st
rate
gic
and
annu
al
perf
orm
ance
pl
ans
base
d on
in
puts
from
co
nsul
tatio
n pr
oces
s
Trai
ning
of d
e-pa
rtm
ents
and
pu
blic
ent
ities
on
the
rev
ised
Fram
ewor
k .
Roll
out
of r
evise
d Fr
amew
ork
for
impl
emen
-ta
tion
by d
e-pa
rtm
ents
and
pu
blic
ent
ities
Roll
out
of r
evise
d Fr
amew
ork
for
impl
e-m
enta
tion
by
depa
rtm
ents
an
d pu
blic
en
titie
s
5.
To e
nhan
ce
cohe
renc
e in
pol
icy
and
plan
ning
Con
duct
soc
io-
econ
omic
impa
ct
asse
ssm
ents
ne
w a
nd e
xist
ing
legi
slat
ion
and
regu
latio
ns t
o en
sure
alig
nmen
t w
ith t
he N
DP
and
miti
gatio
n of
uni
nten
ded
cons
eque
nces
--
-N
ew la
ws
and
regu
latio
ns
unde
rwen
t SE
AIS
New
law
s an
d re
gula
tions
su
bjec
ted
to
SEA
IS p
roce
ss
New
law
s an
d re
gula
tions
su
bjec
ted
to
SEA
IS p
roce
ss
New
pol
icie
s, la
ws
and
regu
latio
ns
unde
rwen
t SE
AIS
New
pol
icie
s, la
ws
and
regu
latio
ns
unde
rwen
t SE
AIS
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
37
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
1 : T
o fa
cilit
ate
long
-ter
m p
lann
ing,
alig
nmen
t of
bud
get
allo
cati
ons
and
shor
t te
rm p
lans
and
dev
elop
pla
nnin
g fr
amew
orks
1.
Cab
inet
app
rove
d fr
amew
ork
for
long
te
rm p
lann
ing
in
gove
rnm
ent
and
long
ter
m s
ecto
r pl
ans
--
-C
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith g
over
nmen
t de
part
men
ts
on a
dis
cuss
ion
docu
men
t on
ap
proa
ches
to
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
long
ter
m
plan
ning
, in
corp
orat
ing
a fr
amew
ork
for
spat
ial p
lann
ing
Cab
inet
app
rove
d fr
amew
ork
for
long
ter
m p
lann
ing
in g
over
nmen
t pr
oduc
ed b
y 31
M
arch
201
8 an
d w
ater
sec
tor
plan
pro
duce
d by
D
ecem
ber
2017
Pilo
t im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he
fram
ewor
k
Rev
ise
fram
ewor
k R
oll-o
ut
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
fr
amew
ork
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
2 :
To e
nsur
e th
at n
atio
nal b
udge
t pr
oces
s is
info
rmed
by
prio
riti
es id
enti
fied
annu
ally
for
gove
rnm
ent
plan
s
2.
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
by A
pril
annu
ally
--
--
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
by
Apr
il 20
17 a
nd
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
for
appr
oval
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
by
Apr
il 20
18
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
by
Apr
il 20
19
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
by
Apr
il 20
20
3.
Ann
ual R
epor
t de
taili
ng t
he
activ
ities
of
the
NPC
and
st
akeh
olde
r en
gage
men
t on
the
N
DP
--
-Pr
oduc
ed a
han
d-ov
er r
epor
t an
d A
nnua
l Rep
ort
on s
take
hold
er
enga
gem
ents
Qua
rter
ly
(act
ivity
rep
ort)
an
d A
nnua
lly(A
R)
prod
uced
Prod
uce
Qua
rter
ly
(act
ivity
re
port
) an
d A
nnua
lly(A
R)
Prod
uce
Qua
rter
ly
(act
ivity
re
port
) an
d A
nnua
lly(A
R)
Prod
uce
Qua
rter
ly
(act
ivity
re
port
) an
d A
nnua
lly(A
R)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
38
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
3: R
esul
ts b
ased
pla
nnin
g in
stit
utio
nalis
ed in
the
nat
iona
l and
pro
vinc
ial s
pher
es o
f gov
ernm
ent
4.
Num
ber
of
asse
ssm
ent
repo
rts
on t
he s
econ
d dr
aft A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce P
lans
pr
ovid
ed t
o na
tiona
l de
part
men
ts b
y 31
Ja
nuar
y 20
18
--
-39
40 a
sses
smen
t re
port
s by
31
Janu
ary
2018
4040
40
5.
Num
ber
of
asse
ssm
ent
repo
rts
on t
he s
econ
d dr
aft
Ann
ual P
erfo
rman
ce
Plan
s pr
ovid
ed
to O
ffice
s of
the
Pr
emie
r by
31
Janu
ary
2018
--
-7
7 as
sess
men
t re
port
s by
31
Janu
ary
2018
Prod
uce
7 as
sess
men
t re
port
s by
31
Janu
ary
2018
77
6.
Qua
rter
ly
Perf
orm
ance
R
epor
ting
Gui
delin
e is
sued
to
all n
atio
nal
depa
rtm
ents
by
15
May
201
7
--
-1
1 G
uide
line
issu
ed b
y 15
May
20
17
11
1
7.
Qua
rter
ly
Perf
orm
ance
R
epor
ting
Gui
delin
e is
sued
to
all O
ffice
s of
the
Pre
mie
r by
15
May
201
7
--
-1
1 G
uide
line
issu
ed b
y 15
May
20
17
11
1
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
39
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
4: T
o en
hanc
e co
here
nce
in p
olic
y an
d pl
anni
ng
8.
Rep
ort
on S
ocio
-Ec
onom
ic Im
pact
A
sses
smen
ts (
SEIA
) co
mpl
eted
for
new
or
am
endm
ents
to
exis
ting
polic
ies,
legi
slat
ion
and
regu
latio
ns
--
--
Ann
ual R
epor
t sh
owin
g su
ppor
t fo
r 80
% o
f re
ques
ted
impa
ct
asse
ssm
ents
by
end
of fi
nanc
ial
year
Prod
uce
Ann
ual R
epor
t sh
owin
g su
ppor
t fo
r 80
% o
f re
ques
ted
impa
ct
asse
ssm
ents
re
ques
ted
Prod
uce
Ann
ual R
epor
t sh
owin
g su
ppor
t fo
r 80
% o
f re
ques
ted
impa
ct
asse
ssm
ents
re
ques
ted
Prod
uce
Ann
ual R
epor
t sh
owin
g su
ppor
t fo
r 80
% o
f re
ques
ted
impa
ct
asse
ssm
ents
re
ques
ted
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
40
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gra
mm
e P
erfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r Q
uar
terl
y T
arge
ts (2
017/
18)
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr-
June
)2n
d (
July
-Sep
t)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
1.
Cab
inet
app
rove
d fr
amew
ork
for
long
te
rm p
lann
ing
in
gove
rnm
ent
and
long
ter
m s
ecto
r pl
ans
Cab
inet
app
rove
d fr
amew
ork
for
long
ter
m p
lann
ing
in g
over
nmen
t pr
oduc
ed b
y 31
M
arch
201
8 an
d w
ater
sec
tor
plan
pro
duce
d by
D
ecem
ber
2017
Ann
ually
A
ppro
ved
Long
te
rm p
lann
ing
fram
ewor
k an
d W
ater
sec
tor
plan
--
Fina
lise
wat
er
sect
or p
lan
fram
ewor
k an
d su
bmit
to C
abin
et
App
rove
d Lo
ng
term
pla
nnin
g fr
amew
ork
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
for
cons
ider
atio
n
2.
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
with
by
Apr
il an
nual
ly
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
by A
pril
2017
and
sub
mitt
ed t
o C
abin
et fo
r ap
prov
al
Ann
ually
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r av
aila
ble
Ann
ual b
udge
t pr
iori
ties
pape
r de
velo
ped
with
N
atio
nal T
reas
ury
by A
pril
2017
--
-
3.
Ann
ual R
epor
t de
taili
ng t
he
activ
ities
of
the
NPC
and
st
akeh
olde
r en
gage
men
t on
the
N
DP
Qua
rter
ly (
activ
ity
repo
rt)
and
Ann
ually
(AR
) pr
oduc
ed
Ann
ually
NPC
qua
rter
ly
activ
ity R
epor
t A
nnua
l Rep
ort
Prod
uce
Qua
rter
ly
(act
ivity
rep
ort)
an
d A
nnua
lly(A
R)
for
finan
cial
yea
r 20
16-1
7
Prod
uce
Qua
rter
ly
activ
ity r
epor
t Pr
oduc
e Q
uart
erly
ac
tivity
rep
ort
Prod
uce
Qua
rter
ly
activ
ity r
epor
t
4.
Num
ber
of
asse
ssm
ent
repo
rts
on t
he s
econ
d dr
aft A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce P
lans
pr
ovid
ed t
o na
tiona
l de
part
men
ts b
y 31
Ja
nuar
y 20
17
40 a
sses
smen
t re
port
s by
31
Janu
ary
2018
Ann
ually
Si
gned
lett
ers
by D
G
and
e-m
ails
(with
as
sess
men
t re
port
s)
sent
to
natio
nal
depa
rtm
ents
--
-40
5.
Num
ber
of
asse
ssm
ent
repo
rts
on t
he s
econ
d dr
aft A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce P
lans
pr
ovid
ed t
o O
ffice
s of
the
Pre
mie
r by
31
Janu
ary
2017
7 as
sess
men
t re
port
s by
31
Janu
ary
2018
Ann
ually
Si
gned
lett
ers
by
DG
and
e-m
ails
with
as
sess
men
t re
port
s se
nt t
o O
ffice
s of
the
Pr
emie
r.
--
-7
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
41
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr-
June
)2n
d (
July
-Sep
t)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
6.
Qua
rter
ly
Perf
orm
ance
R
epor
ting
Gui
delin
e is
sued
to
all
natio
nal
depa
rtm
ents
by
15
May
201
7
1 G
uide
line
issu
ed b
y 15
May
201
7A
nnua
llyEm
ail w
ith a
ttac
hed
QPR
Gui
delin
e se
nt t
o na
tiona
l de
part
men
ts
1-
--
7.
Qua
rter
ly
Perf
orm
ance
R
epor
ting
Gui
delin
e is
sued
to
all O
ffice
s of
the
Pre
mie
r by
15
May
201
7
1 G
uide
line
issu
ed b
y 15
May
201
7A
nnua
llyEm
ail w
ith a
ttac
hed
QPR
Gui
delin
e se
nt
to O
ffice
s of
the
Pr
emie
r
1-
--
8.
Rep
ort
on S
ocio
-Ec
onom
ic Im
pact
A
sses
smen
ts (
SEIA
) co
mpl
eted
for
new
or
am
endm
ents
to
exis
ting
polic
ies,
legi
slat
ion
and
regu
latio
n an
d re
gula
tions
Ann
ual R
epor
t sh
owin
g su
ppor
t fo
r 80
% o
f req
uest
ed
impa
ct a
sses
smen
ts
by e
nd o
f fina
ncia
l ye
ar
Qua
rter
lySE
AIS
Rep
orts
SEIA
S R
epor
ts o
n re
ques
ts r
ecei
ved
in Q
1
SEIA
S R
epor
ts o
n re
ques
ts r
ecei
ved
in Q
2
SEIA
S R
epor
ts o
n re
ques
ts r
ecei
ved
in Q
3
SEIA
S R
epor
ts o
n re
ques
ts r
ecei
ved
in Q
4
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
42
7.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
Nat
iona
l Pla
nnin
g C
oord
inat
ion
Aud
ited
Out
com
eA
ene
Rev
ised
Es
tim
ate
Med
ium
Ter
m E
xpen
ditu
re E
stim
ate
Ran
d th
ousa
nd20
13/1
420
14/1
520
15/1
620
16/1
720
16/1
720
17/1
820
18/1
920
19/2
0
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent:
Nat
iona
l Pla
nnin
g C
oord
inat
ion
10,
450
6,4
88
5,1
13
6,0
85
6,0
85
2,9
41
3,0
66
3,2
27
Plan
ning
Coo
rdin
atio
n 4
4,12
0 6
2,17
3 6
6,64
2 7
5,37
9 7
4,29
4 3
8,05
8 4
4,30
3 4
7,17
0
Soci
o Ec
onom
ic Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
Syst
em -
1
4,05
0 1
1,86
9 8
,602
8
,602
1
3,54
8 1
5,03
1 1
5,81
7
Tota
l 5
4,57
0 8
2,71
1 8
3,62
4 9
0,06
6 8
8,98
1 5
4,54
7 6
2,40
0 6
6,21
4
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
on
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts 5
4,08
3 7
0,60
4 7
9,22
7 8
9,86
6 8
8,78
1 5
3,59
7 6
1,45
0 6
5,26
4
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
17,
225
17,
796
30,
144
29,
369
28,
284
35,
046
41,
398
43,
859
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
36,
858
52,
808
49,
083
60,
497
60,
497
18,
551
20,
052
21,
405
Tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
28
11,
800
35
100
1
00
-
-
-
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 4
59
307
4
,362
1
00
100
9
50
950
9
50
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 5
4,57
0 8
2,71
1 8
3,62
4 9
0,06
6 8
8,98
1 5
4,54
7 6
2,40
0 6
6,21
4
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
43
8) Programme 3: Sector Planning and Monitoring
8.1 Purpose of the programme
The purpose of the programme is to ensure government policy coherence and to develop, facilitate, support and monitor the implementation of sector plans and intervention strategies.
The programme consists of the following two sub-programmes:
Management: Sector Planning and Monitoring
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme.
Sector Planning, Monitoring and Intervention Support
Purpose: Support sector planning functions. Ensure government policy alignment in its goals. Facilitate, support and monitor the implementation of the MTSF, sector plans; and of intervention strategies in priority areas.
8.2 Key Challenges
The key challenges that the programme need to address include the following:
§ MTSF has not been seen to have translated into improvements in the lives of the people;
§ MTSF lacks innovative programmes to address challenges facing the country;
§ MTSF has not interfaced with sub-national plan such as IDPs;
§ DPME does not have adequate authority to direct resources to priority problems;
§ DPME does not adequately monitor front line service delivery across all sectors;
§ DPME have not provided adequate guidance to the implementation of the NDP to government, social partners and private sector.
8.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The focus of the department in the financial year 2017-18 will be on:
§ Complete the Midterm review and present to the July Cabinet Lekgotla of 2017;
§ DPME will sharpen its M&E instruments and focus on tracking the impacts of government interventions on people lives by June 2017;
§ DPME will complete the development of integrated systems and instruments to monitor a larger number of sectors at the coal face particularly in water and sanitation, health and basic education, land restitution, mining licenses;
§ DPME will assist and work with departments to develop programme and project plans to accelerate delivery of key NDP targets in the remaining 2.5 years of the current administration;
§ Progress reports to the Minister and Cabinet on interventions to unblock challenges.
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
44
8.4
Pro
gram
me
3
Pur
pose
of
the
Pro
gram
me:
To
ensu
re g
over
nmen
t po
licy
cohe
renc
e. D
evel
op, f
acili
tate
, sup
port
and
mon
itor
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
sec
tor
plan
s an
d in
terv
entio
n st
rate
gies
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Obj
ecti
ve: E
ffect
ive
M&
E of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
gov
ernm
ent
polic
ies
and
plan
s
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
3: S
trat
egic
obj
ecti
ve a
nd m
ediu
m t
erm
tar
gets
for
2016
/17
– 20
18/1
9
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
Targ
et
(5-y
ear
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
per
form
ance
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Per
form
ance
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2012
-13
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
1.
To p
ursu
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t an
d ad
vanc
emen
t ag
enda
of
gove
rnm
ent
thro
ugh
outc
omes
m
onito
ring
and
re
port
ing
Mon
itor
and
repo
rt o
n th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he M
TSF
Non
eN
one
Non
eRe
view
ed P
OA
, M
TSF
and
Del
iv-
ery
Agr
eem
ent
Prod
uce
quar
terl
y, an
nual
ly a
nd
mid
term
rev
iew
s of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
ag
ains
t N
DP/
MT
SF
Prod
uce
quar
terl
y, an
nual
ly a
nd
mid
term
re
view
s of
go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
Prod
uce
quar
terl
y, an
nual
ly a
nd
mid
term
re
view
s of
go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
Prod
uce
quar
terl
y, an
nual
ly a
nd
mid
term
re
view
s of
go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
2.
To s
uppo
rt
Initi
ativ
es
unde
rtak
en
to u
nblo
ck
prob
lem
s an
d ac
cele
rate
im
plem
enta
tion
in k
ey s
ecto
rs o
f th
e ec
onom
y an
d se
rvic
e de
liver
y
Supp
ort
the
de-
velo
pmen
t an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of d
etai
led
3-fe
et p
lans
in
key
prio
rity
ar
eas.
--
--
Faci
litat
e in
itiat
ives
and
in
terv
entio
ns
aim
ed a
t un
bloc
king
and
se
rvic
e de
liver
y an
d ca
taly
se
impr
ovem
ents
in
iden
tified
are
as
Faci
litat
e in
itiat
ives
and
in
terv
entio
ns
aim
ed a
t un
bloc
king
and
se
rvic
e de
liver
y an
d ca
taly
se
impr
ovem
ents
in
iden
tified
ar
eas
Faci
litat
e in
itiat
ives
and
in
terv
entio
ns
aim
ed a
t un
bloc
king
and
se
rvic
e de
liver
y an
d ca
taly
se
impr
ovem
ents
in
iden
tified
ar
eas
Faci
litat
e in
itiat
ives
and
in
terv
entio
ns
aim
ed a
t un
bloc
king
and
se
rvic
e de
liver
y an
d ca
taly
se
impr
ovem
ents
in
iden
tified
ar
eas
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
45
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an O
bjec
tive
: Sup
plem
enta
ry p
lans
, pol
icie
s an
d fr
amew
orks
to
the
ND
P 20
30 d
evel
oped
and
impl
emen
ted
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive1
: To
faci
litat
e th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he 1
4 na
tiona
l out
com
es(e
xclu
ding
out
com
es 9
and
12)
1.
Mid
term
Rev
iew
of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
(2
014-
2016
) co
mpl
eted
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
Mid
term
rev
iew
co
mpl
eted
by
July
20
17
Rev
ised
MT
SF
Cha
pter
s co
mpl
eted
by
Apr
il 20
18 -i
ncor
pora
ting
findi
ngs
from
the
m
idte
rm r
evie
w
End
of t
erm
rev
iew
of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
co
mpl
eted
by
July
20
19
Rev
ised
MT
SF
Cha
pter
s fo
r th
e
2.
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
Cha
pter
s re
view
ed
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
Cha
pter
s re
view
ed b
y D
ecem
ber
2017
to
inco
rpor
ate
findi
ngs
from
th
e m
idte
rm
revi
ew
Ass
essm
ent
of a
lignm
ent
of A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
s (A
PPs)
of
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtm
ents
to
the
mid
term
re
view
com
plet
ed
by A
pril
2018
and
fe
edba
ck p
rovi
ded
to d
epar
tmen
ts
Ass
essm
ent
of a
lignm
ent
of A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
s (A
PPs)
of
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtm
ents
to
the
mid
term
re
view
com
plet
ed
by A
pril
2019
and
fe
edba
ck p
rovi
ded
to d
epar
tmen
ts
Ass
essm
ent
of a
lignm
ent
of A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
s (A
PPs)
of
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtm
ents
to
the
mid
term
re
view
com
plet
ed
by A
pril
2019
and
fe
edba
ck p
rovi
ded
to d
epar
tmen
ts
3.
Num
ber
of
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et o
n th
e pr
iori
ty
Out
com
es
--
--
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
on
all O
utco
mes
su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et in
June
, Se
ptem
ber
and
Nov
embe
r 20
17
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
on
all (
excl
udin
g ou
tcom
es 9
and
12
) Out
com
es
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
in Ju
ne,
Sept
embe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2017
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
on
all (
excl
udin
g ou
tcom
es 9
and
12
) Out
com
es
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
in Ju
ne,
Sept
embe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2017
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
on
all (
excl
udin
g ou
tcom
es 9
and
12
) Out
com
es
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
in Ju
ne,
Sept
embe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2017
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
46
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an O
bjec
tive
: Sup
plem
enta
ry p
lans
, pol
icie
s an
d fr
amew
orks
to
the
ND
P 20
30 d
evel
oped
and
impl
emen
ted
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
2: T
o su
ppor
t In
itia
tive
s un
dert
aken
to
unbl
ock
prob
lem
s an
d ac
cele
rate
impl
emen
tati
on in
key
sec
tors
of t
he e
cono
my
and
serv
ice
deliv
ery
4.
Num
ber
of
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akis
a Pr
ogre
ss
Rep
orts
pr
oduc
ed
--
--
One
C
ompr
ehen
sive
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akisa
Pro
gres
s Re
port
pro
duce
d qu
arte
rly,
enco
mpa
ssin
g pr
ogre
ss w
ith a
ll 6
deliv
ery
labs
One
C
ompr
ehen
sive
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akisa
Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
t pr
oduc
ed q
uart
erly,
en
com
pass
ing
prog
ress
with
all
6 de
liver
y la
bs
One
C
ompr
ehen
sive
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akisa
Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
t pr
oduc
ed q
uart
erly,
en
com
pass
ing
prog
ress
with
all
deliv
ery
labs
One
C
ompr
ehen
sive
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akisa
Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
t pr
oduc
ed q
uart
erly,
en
com
pass
ing
prog
ress
with
all
deliv
ery
labs
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
47
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gra
mm
e P
erfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r Q
uar
terl
y T
arge
ts (2
017/
18)
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr-
June
)2n
d (
July
-Sep
t)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
1.
Mid
term
R
evie
w o
f go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
(201
4-20
16)
com
plet
ed
Mid
term
rev
iew
co
mpl
eted
by
July
20
17
Ann
ually
M
idte
rm R
evie
w
Rep
ort
2014
-201
6 av
aila
ble
-M
idte
rm R
evie
w
Rep
ort
2014
-201
6 av
aila
ble
by Ju
ly
2017
--
2.
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
Cha
pter
s re
view
ed
MTS
F 20
14-2
019
Cha
pter
s re
view
ed
by D
ecem
ber
2017
to
inco
rpor
ate
findi
ngs
from
the
m
idte
rm r
evie
w
Ann
ually
Rev
iew
ed M
TSF
20
14-2
019
Cha
pter
s
--
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
Cha
pter
s re
view
ed b
y D
ecem
ber
2017
-
3.
Num
ber
of
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et o
n th
e 14
Out
com
es
MT
SF P
rogr
ess
Rep
orts
on
all O
utco
mes
su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et in
June
, Se
ptem
ber
and
Nov
embe
r 20
17
Thr
ee t
imes
a y
ear
MT
SF P
rogr
ess
Rep
orts
ava
ilabl
eM
TSF
Pro
gres
s R
epor
ts o
n O
utco
mes
co
mpl
eted
in Ju
ne
2017
MT
SF P
rogr
ess
Rep
orts
on
Out
com
es
com
plet
ed in
Se
ptem
ber
2017
MT
SF P
rogr
ess
Rep
orts
on
Out
com
es
com
plet
ed in
N
ovem
ber
2017
-
4.
Num
ber
of
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akis
a Pr
ogre
ss
Rep
orts
pr
oduc
ed
One
C
ompr
ehen
sive
Ope
ratio
n Ph
akisa
Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
t pr
oduc
ed q
uart
erly,
en
com
pass
ing
prog
ress
with
all
6 de
liver
y la
bs
Qua
rter
ly Q
uart
erly
O
pera
tion
Phak
isa
Prog
ress
Rep
orts
av
aila
ble
1 co
mpr
ehen
sive
Q
uart
erly
O
pera
tion
Phak
isa
Prog
ress
Rep
ort
prod
uced
1 co
mpr
ehen
sive
Q
uart
erly
O
pera
tion
Phak
isa
Prog
ress
Rep
ort
prod
uced
1 co
mpr
ehen
sive
Q
uart
erly
O
pera
tion
Phak
isa
Prog
ress
Rep
orts
pr
oduc
ed
1 co
mpr
ehen
sive
Q
uart
erly
O
pera
tion
Phak
isa
Prog
ress
Rep
orts
pr
oduc
ed
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
48
8.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
SEC
TO
R P
LAN
NIN
G A
ND
M
ON
ITO
RIN
G
AU
DIT
ED O
UT
CO
ME
AEN
ER
EVIS
ED
EST
IMA
TE
MED
IUM
TER
M E
XPE
ND
ITU
RE
EST
IMA
TE
Ran
d th
ousa
nd20
13/1
420
14/1
520
15/1
620
16/1
720
16/1
720
17/1
820
18/1
920
19/2
0
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent:
Sect
or P
lann
ing
and
Mon
itori
ng 6
,577
3
,182
2
,390
1
,218
4
18
2,5
54
2,6
61
2,7
78
Sect
or P
lann
ing,
Mon
itori
ng a
nd
Inte
rven
tion
Supp
ort
27,
932
30,
755
30,
517
41,
860
37,
860
49,
599
55,
250
58,
177
Tota
l 3
4,50
9 3
3,93
7 3
2,90
7 4
3,07
8 3
8,27
8 5
2,15
3 5
7,91
1 6
0,95
5
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
on
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts 3
4,39
6 3
3,81
1 3
2,86
1 4
3,03
2 3
8,23
2 5
2,05
3 5
7,81
1 6
0,85
5
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
25,
321
28,
913
27,
598
37,
794
32,
994
47,
196
52,
819
55,
744
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
9,0
75
4,8
98
5,2
63
5,2
38
5,2
38
4,8
57
4,9
92
5,1
11
Tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
48
84
-
-
-
-
-
-
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 6
5 4
2 4
6 4
6 4
6 1
00
100
1
00
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 3
4,50
9 3
3,93
7 3
2,90
7 4
3,07
8 3
8,27
8 5
2,15
3 5
7,91
1 6
0,95
5
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
49
9) Programme 4: Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity Development
9.1 Purpose of the programme
The purpose: To support the implementation of the NDP/ Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) by monitoring and improving the capacity of state institutions to develop and implement plans, and provide services.
The programme is made up of the following three sub-programmes:
Public Service Monitoring and Support
Purpose: Review, monitor and support the implementation of MTSF outcome 12 and implement strategic interventions to support and unblock implementation
Local Government Monitoring and Support
Purpose: Review, monitor and support the implementation of MTSF outcome 9 and implement strategic interventions to support and unblock implementation
Capacity Development
Purpose: Coordinate capacity development programmes to ensure effective development and application of PM&E policies, tools, systems and guidelines in government
9.2 Key Challenges
The key challenges that the programme needs to address is to measure and support improved management and operational performance in the three spheres of government through the development, implementation and maintenance of a management improvement models and tools to support the implementation of MTSF outcomes 9 and 12.
9.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The focus of the department in the financial year 2017-18 will be on:
§ Review, monitor and support the implementation of Medium Term Strategic Framework in the public sector and implement strategic interventions to support and unblock implementation
§ Development and implement management performance assessment tools and interventions strategies to unblock implementation challenges in selected NDP targets
§ Development and implement management performance assessment tools and interventions strategies for Metros and Municipalities
§ Coordinate capacity development programmes to ensure effective development and application of PM&E policies, tools, systems and guidelines in government
§ Monitor a range of indicators of the performance of the public service and reports on these to Forum of South Africa Directors-general (FOSAD). This enables FOSAD to focus on reviewing the extent to which weaknesses in the management of national and provincial departments are being addressed
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
50
9.4
Pro
gram
me
4
Pur
pose
of
the
Pro
gram
me:
To
supp
ort
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
med
ium
ter
m s
trat
egic
fram
ewor
k by
mon
itori
ng a
nd im
prov
ing
the
capa
city
of s
tate
in
stitu
tions
to
deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t pl
ans,
and
prov
ide
serv
ices
.
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Obj
ecti
ve: E
ffect
ive
M&
E of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
gov
ernm
ent
polic
ies
and
plan
s
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
4: S
trat
egic
obj
ecti
ve a
nd m
ediu
m t
erm
tar
gets
for
2016
/17
– 20
18/1
9
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
Targ
et (
5-ye
ar
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
per
form
ance
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Per
form
ance
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2012
-13
2013
-20
1420
14-
2015
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
1.
To p
ursu
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t ad
vanc
emen
t ag
enda
of
gove
rnm
ent
thro
ugh
Out
com
e m
onito
ring
an
d re
port
ing
(for
Out
com
e 9
and
12)
and
to im
prov
e th
e ca
paci
ty
of s
tate
in
stitu
tions
Mon
itor
and
repo
rt o
n th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he M
TSF
Non
eN
one
Non
eRe
view
ed
POA
, MTS
F an
d D
eliv
ery
Agr
eem
ent
Prod
uce
quar
terly
, an
nual
and
mid
-te
rm r
evie
w
of g
over
nmen
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
(Out
com
e 9
and
12)
Prod
uce
quar
terly
, ann
ual
and
mid
-ter
m
revi
ew o
f go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
(Out
com
e 9
and
12)
Prod
uce
quar
terly
, ann
ual
and
mid
-ter
m
revi
ew o
f go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
(Out
com
e 9
and
12
Prod
uce
quar
terly
, ann
ual
and
mid
-ter
m
revi
ew o
f go
vern
men
t pe
rfor
man
ce
agai
nst
ND
P/M
TSF
(Out
com
e 9
and
12
2.
To s
uppo
rt
Initi
ativ
es
unde
rtak
en
to u
nblo
ck
prob
lem
s an
d ac
cele
rate
im
plem
enta
tion
of g
ood
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
Dev
elop
an
d us
e ap
prop
riat
e to
ols
to
mon
itor
stat
e of
com
plia
nce
with
m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es
annu
ally
in t
he
thre
e sp
here
s of
gov
ernm
ent
--
-Fa
cilit
ate
asse
ssm
ent
and
prov
ide
supp
ort
to b
uild
te
chni
cal a
nd
wor
k-pl
ace
capa
bilit
ies
to d
eliv
er o
n go
vern
men
t pr
iori
ties.
Faci
litat
e as
sess
men
t an
d pr
ovid
e su
ppor
t to
bu
ild t
echn
ical
an
d w
ork-
plac
e ca
pabi
litie
s to
del
iver
on
gove
rnm
ent
prio
ritie
s.
Faci
litat
e as
sess
men
t an
d pr
ovid
e su
ppor
t to
bu
ild t
echn
ical
an
d w
ork-
plac
e ca
pabi
litie
s to
del
iver
on
gove
rnm
ent
prio
ritie
s.
Faci
litat
e as
sess
men
t an
d pr
ovid
e su
ppor
t to
bui
ld t
echn
ical
an
d w
ork-
plac
e ca
pabi
litie
s to
del
iver
on
gove
rnm
ent
prio
ritie
s.
Faci
litat
e as
sess
men
t an
d pr
ovid
e su
ppor
t to
bu
ild t
echn
ical
an
d w
ork-
plac
e ca
pabi
litie
s to
del
iver
on
gove
rnm
ent
prio
ritie
s.
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
51
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
r/s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
1.
Mid
term
Rev
iew
of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
(201
4-16
) re
late
d to
out
com
es 9
an
d 12
com
plet
ed
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
Mid
term
rev
iew
of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
rel
ated
to
out
com
es 9
and
12
com
plet
ed b
y Ju
ly
2017
Rev
ised
MT
SF
Cha
pter
s co
mpl
eted
by
Apr
il 20
18
-inco
rpor
atin
g fin
ding
s fr
om t
he
mid
term
rev
iew
End
of t
erm
re
view
of
gove
rnm
ent
perf
orm
ance
co
mpl
eted
by
July
201
9
Rev
ised
MT
SF
Cha
pter
s
2.
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
C
hapt
ers
for
outc
omes
9
and
12 r
evie
wed
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
C
hapt
ers
revi
ewed
by
Dec
embe
r 20
17 t
o in
corp
orat
e fin
ding
s fr
om t
he m
idte
rm
revi
ew
Ass
essm
ent
of
alig
nmen
t of
Ann
ual
Perf
orm
ance
Pl
ans
(APP
s)
of g
over
nmen
t de
part
men
ts
to t
he m
idte
rm
revi
ew c
ompl
eted
by
Apr
il 20
18 a
nd
feed
back
pro
vide
d to
dep
artm
ents
Ass
essm
ent
of a
lignm
ent
of A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
s (A
PPs)
of
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtm
ents
to
the
m
idte
rm
revi
ew
com
plet
ed b
y A
pril
2019
an
d fe
edba
ck
prov
ided
to
depa
rtm
ents
Ass
essm
ent
of a
lignm
ent
of A
nnua
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Plan
s (A
PPs)
of
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtm
ents
to
the
m
idte
rm
revi
ew
com
plet
ed b
y A
pril
2020
an
d fe
edba
ck
prov
ided
to
depa
rtm
ents
3.
Num
ber
of Q
uart
erly
R
epor
ts s
ubm
itted
to
Cab
inet
on
outc
omes
9
and
12
--
--
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
ts
outc
omes
9 a
nd 1
2 su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et
in Ju
ne, S
epte
mbe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2017
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
outc
omes
9
and
12 s
ubm
itted
to
Cab
inet
in Ju
ne,
Sept
embe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2018
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
outc
omes
9
and
12
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
in Ju
ne,
Sept
embe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2019
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss
Repo
rts
outc
omes
9
and
12
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
in Ju
ne,
Sept
embe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2020
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
52
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
r/s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
4.
Perc
enta
ge o
f dep
artm
ents
as
sess
ed o
n m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es
156
(42
natio
nal
depa
rtm
ents
an
d 11
4 pr
ovin
cial
de
part
men
ts
com
plet
ed
MPA
T as
sess
men
ts
100%
96%
(147
of
153
) of
depa
rtm
ents
co
mpl
eted
M
PAT
and
signe
d of
f by
the
ir
HO
Ds
by
31 O
ctob
er
2014
90%
of
depa
rtm
ents
co
mpl
ete
MPA
T an
d ha
ve t
hem
sig
ned
off b
y th
eir
HO
Ds
by 3
1 O
ctob
er 2
015
95%
MPA
T as
sess
men
ts
com
plet
ed fo
r na
tiona
l and
pro
vinc
ial
depa
rtm
ents
by
31
Mar
ch 2
018
95%
MPA
T
asse
ssm
ents
co
mpl
eted
fo
r na
tiona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
de
part
men
ts b
y 31
M
arch
201
8
95%
MPA
T
asse
ssm
ents
co
mpl
eted
fo
r na
tiona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
de
part
men
ts
by t
he e
nd o
f fin
anci
al y
ear
95%
MPA
T
asse
ssm
ents
co
mpl
eted
fo
r na
tiona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
de
part
men
ts
by t
he e
nd o
f fin
anci
al y
ear
5.
Num
ber
of L
GM
IM
scor
ecar
ds c
ompl
eted
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
Prod
uce
30 s
core
ca
rds
by e
nd o
f fin
anci
al y
ear
30 s
core
card
s30
sco
reca
rds
30 s
core
card
s
6.
Perc
enta
ge o
f tar
gets
in
the
PM
&E
Cap
acity
D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
ac
hiev
ed
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
Ach
ieve
80%
of
targ
ets
in t
he C
apac
ity
Dev
elop
men
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Plan
Ach
ieve
80%
of
tar
gets
in
the
Cap
acity
D
evel
opm
ent
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
an
Ach
ieve
80%
of
tar
gets
in
the
Cap
acity
D
evel
opm
ent
Impl
emen
ta-
tion
Plan
Ach
ieve
80%
of
tar
gets
in
the
Cap
acity
D
evel
opm
ent
Impl
emen
ta-
tion
Plan
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
53
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gra
mm
e P
erfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r Q
uar
terl
y T
arge
ts (2
017/
18)
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr-
June
)2n
d (
July
-Sep
t)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
1.
Mid
term
Rev
iew
of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
(2
014-
16)
rela
ted
to
outc
omes
9 a
nd 1
2 co
mpl
eted
Mid
term
rev
iew
of
gov
ernm
ent
perf
orm
ance
rel
ated
to
out
com
es 9
and
12
com
plet
ed c
ompl
eted
by
July
201
7
Ann
ual
Mid
-ter
m r
evie
wed
re
port
2014
-201
6 av
aila
ble
-M
id-t
erm
rev
iew
re
port
201
4-16
av
aila
ble
by Ju
ly
2017
--
2.
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
C
hapt
ers
for
outc
omes
9 a
nd 1
2 re
view
ed
MT
SF 2
014-
2019
C
hapt
ers
revi
ewed
by
Dec
embe
r 20
17 t
o in
corp
orat
e fin
ding
s fr
om t
he m
idte
rm
revi
ew
Ann
ually
Rev
iew
ed M
TSF
re
port
201
4-20
19 c
hapt
ers
for
Out
com
es 9
and
12
--
MTS
F 20
14-1
9 C
hapt
ers
(for
Out
com
e 9-
12)
revi
ewed
by
Dec
embe
r 20
17
1 ea
ch fo
r O
utco
mes
9 a
nd
12
3.
Num
ber
of
Qua
rter
ly R
epor
ts
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
on
outc
omes
9 a
nd 1
2
MTS
F Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
ts
outc
omes
9 a
nd 1
2 su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et
in Ju
ne, S
epte
mbe
r an
d N
ovem
ber
2017
3 tim
es a
yea
rM
TSF
pro
gres
s re
port
ava
ilabl
eM
TSF
pro
gres
s re
port
( fo
r O
utco
me
9 an
d 12
) co
mpl
eted
in
June
201
7
MT
SF p
rogr
ess
repo
rt (
for
Out
com
e 9
and
12)
com
plet
ed in
Se
ptem
ber
2017
MTS
F pr
ogre
ss
repo
rt (
for
Out
com
e 9
and
12) c
ompl
eted
in
Nov
embe
r 20
17
-
4.
Perc
enta
ge o
f de
part
men
ts
asse
ssed
on
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
95%
MPA
T as
sess
men
ts
com
plet
ed fo
r na
tiona
l and
pro
vinc
ial
depa
rtm
ents
by
31
Mar
ch 2
018
Ann
ually
MPA
T st
anda
rds
and
guid
elin
es
MPA
T se
lf-as
sess
men
t sy
stem
s re
port
MPA
T m
oder
atio
n sy
stem
s re
port
MPA
T fin
al r
esul
ts
repo
rt
Publ
ish a
ppro
ved
stan
dard
sFa
cilit
ate
self-
asse
ssm
ent
at a
ll na
tiona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
de
part
men
ts
Mod
erat
ion
com
plet
ed fo
r al
l nat
iona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
de
part
men
ts
Com
mun
icat
e fin
al s
core
s to
all
natio
nal
and
prov
inci
al
depa
rtm
ents
5.
Num
ber
of
LGM
IM s
core
card
s co
mpl
eted
Prod
uce
30 s
core
car
ds
by e
nd o
f fina
ncia
l yea
rA
nnua
llySc
orec
ards
ge
nera
ted
--
-30
sco
reca
rds
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
54
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr-
June
)2n
d (
July
-Sep
t)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
6.
Perc
enta
ge o
f ta
rget
s in
the
PM
&E
Cap
acity
D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
ac
hiev
ed
Ach
ieve
80%
of
targ
ets
in t
he C
apac
ity
Dev
elop
men
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Plan
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
Rev
ise
plan
ning
an
d M
&E
capa
city
de
velo
pmen
t st
rate
gy a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n pl
an a
nd s
ubm
it to
DD
G: I
PME
for
appr
oval
by
31
May
201
7
Prod
uce
1 pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t sh
owin
g 20
%
achi
evem
ent
of
targ
ets
in t
he
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
an
Prod
uce
1 pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t sh
owin
g 40
%
achi
evem
ent
of
targ
ets
in t
he
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
an
Prod
uce
1 pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t sh
owin
g 60
%
achi
evem
ent
of
targ
ets
in t
he
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
an
Prod
uce
1 pr
ogre
ss r
epor
t sh
owin
g 80
%
achi
evem
ent
of
targ
ets
in t
he
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
an
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
55
9.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
PUB
LIC
SEC
TO
R M
ON
IRO
TIN
G A
ND
C
APA
CIT
Y D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
A
UD
ITED
OU
TC
OM
EA
ENE
REV
ISED
ES
TIM
AT
EM
EDIU
M T
ERM
EX
PEN
DIT
UR
E ES
TIM
AT
E
Ran
d th
ousa
nd20
13/1
420
14/1
520
15/1
620
16/1
720
16/1
720
17/1
820
18/1
920
19/2
0
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent:
Publ
ic S
ecto
r M
onito
ring
and
C
apac
ity D
evel
opm
ent
-
-
-
-
-
1,1
87
2,7
01
2,8
18
Publ
ic S
ecto
r C
apac
ity D
evel
opm
ent
8,0
27
7,6
99
6,7
27
6,4
11
6,4
11
15,
164
17,
885
18,
979
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce a
nd L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent
Mon
itori
ng a
nd S
uppo
rt 1
8,48
6 2
1,85
1 1
9,36
1 2
3,23
1 2
3,23
1 2
3,76
0 2
5,36
5 2
7,17
9
Tota
l 2
6,51
3 2
9,55
0 2
6,08
8 2
9,64
2 2
9,64
2 4
0,11
1 4
5,95
1 4
8,97
6
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
on
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts 2
5,86
6 2
8,71
4 2
5,06
7 2
8,37
7 2
8,37
7 3
9,17
6 4
5,00
6 4
7,72
1
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
18,
026
22,
452
20,
167
25,
284
25,
284
34,
054
39,
583
41,
953
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
7,8
40
6,2
62
4,9
00
3,0
93
3,0
93
5,1
22
5,4
23
5,7
68
Tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
58
10
53
-
-
-
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 5
89
826
9
68
1,2
65
1,2
65
935
9
45
1,2
55
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 2
6,51
3 2
9,55
0 2
6,08
8 2
9,64
2 2
9,64
2 4
0,11
1 4
5,95
1 4
8,97
6
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
56
10) Programme 5: Frontline and Citizen Based Service Delivery Monitoring
10.1 Purpose of the programme
The purpose of the programme is to facilitate service delivery improvements through frontline and citizen-based monitoring and effective complaints resolution systems.
The programme is made up of the following:
Citizen Based Monitoring; Executive Support Monitoring; Presidential Hotline
10.2 Key Challenges
The key challenges that the programme faces is capacity to expand its reach to as may facilities as possible and to ensure that its monitoring data feeds into the monitoring system for outcomes.
10.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The focus of the department in the financial year 2017-18 will be on:
§ Expand and maintain frontline monitoring systems capable of verifying government performance and implementing strategic interventions to improve performance
§ Facilitate implementation of strategi interventions to improve service delivery
§ Establish, coordinate and enhance citizen and community monitoring and complaints resolution systems
10.4 Programme 5
Purpose of the Programme: Facilitate service delivery improvements through frontline and citizen-based monitoring and effective complaints resolution systems
Strategic Plan Objective: Effective M&E of implementation of government policies and plans
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
57
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
5: S
trat
egic
obj
ecti
ve a
nd m
ediu
m t
erm
tar
gets
for
2016
/17
– 20
18/1
9
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an
Targ
et (
5-ye
ar
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
Per
form
ance
2015
-201
6
Pla
nned
Per
form
ance
2016
-201
7
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
17-2
018
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
To m
onito
r th
e qu
ality
of t
he
serv
ices
pro
vide
d by
gov
ernm
ent
to c
itize
ns a
t in
stitu
tion
and
faci
lity
leve
l
Dev
elop
, rev
iew
an
d im
plem
ent
fron
tline
ser
vice
m
otor
ing
tool
s
Nat
iona
l vi
sits
sche
dule
d fin
alise
d an
d 21
5 vi
sits
wer
e co
nduc
ted
Polic
y fr
amew
ork
for
CBM
ap
prov
ed b
y th
e M
inist
er
196
sites
w
ere
mon
itore
d by
due
dat
e
Citi
zen-
base
d m
onito
ring
pi
lot
initi
ated
in
5 fa
cilit
ies
123
new
faci
litie
s
Citi
zen-
base
d m
onito
ring
pi
lote
d in
3
faci
litie
s
Dev
elop
and
/or
revi
ew fr
ontli
ne
mon
itori
ng t
ools,
im
plem
ent
and
prod
uce
prog
ress
re
port
s
Dev
elop
and
/or
revi
ew fr
ontli
ne
mon
itori
ng t
ools,
im
plem
ent
and
prod
uce
prog
ress
re
port
s
Dev
elop
and
/or
revi
ew fr
ontli
ne
mon
itori
ng
tool
s, im
plem
ent
and
prod
uce
prog
ress
rep
orts
Dev
elop
and
/or
revi
ew fr
ontli
ne
mon
itori
ng t
ools,
im
plem
ent
and
prod
uce
prog
ress
re
port
s
Dev
elop
and
/or
revi
ew fr
ontli
ne
mon
itori
ng
tool
s, im
plem
ent
and
prod
uce
prog
ress
re
port
s
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
58
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
1.
Num
ber
of
mon
itori
ng v
isits
to
sup
port
pol
icy
prio
ritie
s
Nat
iona
l visi
ts
sche
dule
d fin
alise
d an
d 21
5 vi
sits
wer
e co
nduc
ted
196
sites
wer
e m
onito
red
by
due
date
123
new
faci
litie
s w
ere
90 n
ew fa
cilit
ies
mon
itore
d an
d pa
ssed
qua
lity
assu
ranc
e w
ith
site
mon
itori
ng
repo
rts
capt
ured
on
the
M-d
rive
by
31 M
arch
201
6
400
400
400
400
2.
Num
ber
of
depa
rtm
ents
im
plem
entin
g C
BM
Polic
y fr
amew
ork
for
CBM
app
rove
d by
the
Min
ister
Citi
zen-
base
d m
onito
ring
pilo
t in
itiat
ed in
5
faci
litie
s
Citi
zen-
base
d m
onito
ring
pi
lote
d in
3
faci
litie
s
33
33
3
3.
Perc
enta
ge
of t
arge
ts in
th
e A
nnua
l Pr
esid
entia
l H
otlin
e En
hanc
emen
t Pl
an
impl
emen
ted
Not
app
licab
le
for
the
peri
odN
ot a
pplic
able
fo
r th
e pe
riod
Not
app
licab
le
for
the
peri
odPr
oduc
e cu
stom
er
satis
fact
ion
surv
ey
repo
rts
by e
nd o
f ea
ch q
uart
er
80%
ac
hiev
emen
t of
tar
gets
in
Ann
ual
Pres
iden
tial
Enha
ncem
ent
Plan
80%
ac
hiev
emen
t of
tar
gets
in
Ann
ual
Pres
iden
tial
Enha
ncem
ent
Plan
80%
ac
hiev
emen
t of
tar
gets
in
Ann
ual
Pres
iden
tial
Enha
ncem
ent
Plan
80%
ac
hiev
emen
t of
tar
gets
in
Ann
ual
Pres
iden
tial
Enha
ncem
ent
Plan
4.
Num
ber
of
Siya
hlol
a an
d Iz
imbi
zo
coor
dina
ted
for
whi
ch b
riefi
ng
note
s/ r
epor
ts
are
prep
ared
--
--
Con
duct
10
visi
ts a
nd
prod
uce
area
pro
files
/br
iefin
g no
tes/
repo
rts
on
Siya
hlol
a an
d iz
imbi
zo
quar
terl
y
Con
duct
10
visi
ts a
nd
prod
uce
area
pro
files
/br
iefin
g no
tes/
repo
rts
on
Siya
hlol
a an
d iz
imbi
zo
quar
terl
y
Con
duct
10
visi
ts a
nd
prod
uce
area
pro
files
/br
iefin
g no
tes/
repo
rts
on
Siya
hlol
a an
d iz
imbi
zo
quar
terl
y
Con
duct
10
visi
ts a
nd
prod
uce
area
pro
files
/br
iefin
g no
tes/
repo
rts
on
Siya
hlol
a an
d iz
imbi
zo
quar
terl
y
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gra
mm
e P
erfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r Q
uar
terl
y T
arge
ts (2
017/
18)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
59
Perf
orm
ance
In
dic
ato
r/s
Targ
et
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr-
June
)2n
d (
July
-Sep
t)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-M
arch
)
1 N
umbe
r of
m
onito
ring
vis
its
to s
uppo
rt p
olic
y pr
iori
ties
400
Qua
rter
lyPr
ogre
ss r
epor
ts75
150
150
25
2 N
umbe
r of
de
part
men
ts
impl
emen
ting
CBM
3Q
uart
erly
Prog
ress
rep
orts
Part
icip
atin
g de
part
men
ts
sele
cted
by
30 Ju
ne
2017
Plan
ning
and
in
cept
ion
com
plet
ed w
ith
3 (t
hree
) se
ctor
de
part
men
ts b
y 30
Se
ptem
ber
2017
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
C
BM in
terv
entio
ns
by 1
5 D
ecem
ber
2017
Rev
iew
s of
in
terv
entio
ns
com
plet
ed
with
3 (
thre
e)
depa
rtm
ents
by
Mar
ch 2
018
3 Pe
rcen
tage
of
tar
gets
in
the
Ann
ual
Pres
iden
tial
Hot
line
Enha
ncem
ent
Plan
im
plem
ente
d
80%
ach
ieve
men
t of
tar
gets
in
Ann
ual
Pres
iden
tial
Enha
ncem
ent
Plan
Qua
rter
ly
Prog
ress
m
onito
ring
rep
orts
80%
ach
ieve
men
ts
of Q
1 ta
rget
s in
pl
an
80%
ach
ieve
men
ts
of Q
2 ta
rget
s in
pl
an
80%
ach
ieve
men
ts
of Q
3 ta
rget
s in
pl
an
80%
ac
hiev
emen
ts
of Q
4 ta
rget
s in
pl
an
4 N
umbe
r of
Si
yahl
ola
and
Izim
bizo
co
ordi
nate
d fo
r w
hich
bri
efing
no
tes/
rep
orts
are
pr
epar
ed
Con
duct
10
visi
ts
and
prod
uce
area
pr
ofile
s/br
iefin
g no
tes/
repo
rts
on S
iyah
lola
and
iz
imbi
zo q
uart
erly
Qua
rter
lySi
yahl
ola
and
Izim
bizo
rep
orts
/br
iefin
g no
tes/
profi
les
Con
duct
2 v
isits
an
d pr
oduc
e ar
ea
profi
les/
brie
fing
note
s/re
port
s on
Siy
ahlo
la a
nd
izim
bizo
for
the
quar
ter
Con
duct
3 v
isits
an
d pr
oduc
e ar
ea
profi
les/
brie
fing
note
s/re
port
s on
Siy
ahlo
la a
nd
izim
bizo
for
the
quar
ter
Con
duct
2 v
isits
an
d pr
oduc
e ar
ea
profi
les/
brie
fing
note
s/re
port
s on
Siy
ahlo
la a
nd
izim
bizo
for
the
quar
ter
Con
duct
3 v
isits
an
d pr
oduc
e ar
ea
profi
les/
brie
fing
note
s/re
port
s on
Siy
ahlo
la a
nd
izim
bizo
for
the
quar
ter
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
60
10.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
FRO
NT
LIN
E A
ND
CIT
IZE
N-B
ASE
D S
ER
VIC
E
DE
LIV
ER
Y M
ON
ITO
RIN
G
AU
DIT
ED
OU
TC
OM
EA
EN
ER
EV
ISE
D
EST
IMA
TE
ME
DIU
M T
ER
M E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E
EST
IMA
TE
Ran
d th
ous
and
2013
/14
2014
/15
2015
/16
2016
/17
2016
/17
2017
/18
2018
/19
2019
/20
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent:
Fron
tline
and
Citi
zen-
base
d Se
rvic
e D
eliv
ery
Mon
itori
ng 1
,979
1
,954
2
,086
2
,995
1
,795
2
,554
2
,661
2
,778
Fron
tline
and
Citi
zen-
base
d Se
rvic
e D
eliv
ery
Mon
itori
ng
and
Com
plai
nts
Res
olut
ion
37,
173
37,
887
44,
975
51,
284
51,
284
54,
409
58,
223
62,
715
Tota
l 3
9,15
2 3
9,84
1 4
7,06
1 5
4,27
9 5
3,07
9 5
6,96
3 6
0,88
4 6
5,49
3
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
on
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts 3
9,07
6 3
9,65
3 4
6,93
9 5
4,16
9 5
2,96
9 5
6,85
3 6
0,77
4 6
5,38
3
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
20,
506
22,
315
28,
059
35,
799
34,
599
36,
662
39,
808
42,
309
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
18,
570
17,
338
18,
880
18,
370
18,
370
20,
191
20,
966
23,
074
Tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
-
72
37
10
10
-
-
-
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 7
6 1
15
85
100
1
00
110
1
10
110
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 3
9,15
2 3
9,84
1 4
7,06
1 5
4,27
9 5
3,07
9 5
6,96
3 6
0,88
4 6
5,49
3
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
61
11) Programme 6: Evidence and Knowledge Systems
11.1 Purpose of the programme
The purpose of the programme is to coordinate and support the generation, collation, accessibility and timely use of quality evidence to support performance monitoring and evaluation across government coordinate and support the generation, collation, access and timely use of quality evidence to support PM&E across government
The programme is made up of the following two sub-programmes:
Management: Evidence and Knowledge Systems
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme
Evaluation, Research, Knowledge and Data Systems
Purpose: Provide evaluation, research, knowledge management and data integration and analysis services
11.2 Key Challenges
The key challenges that the programme faces is capacity to expand its reach to as may facilities as possible and to ensure that its monitoring data feeds into the monitoring system for outcomes.
11.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The focus of the department in the financial year 2017-18 will be to:
§ coordinate and support the generation, collation, access and timely use of quality evidence to support PM&E across government
§ Coordinate and support a national evaluation system that ensures the use of evidence from regular and quality evaluations of priority government policies, programmes, and systems
§ Provide centralised research and knowledge management support to develop and maintain an evidence base to inform planning, policy development, implementation monitoring and review
§ Provide quality, timely and verified data and analysis of data to support planning, monitoring and evaluation
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
62
11.4
Pro
gram
me
6
Pur
pose
of
the
Pro
gram
me:
To
coor
dina
te a
nd s
uppo
rt t
he g
ener
atio
n, c
olla
tion,
acc
essi
bilit
y an
d tim
ely
use
of q
ualit
y ev
iden
ce t
o su
ppor
t pe
rfor
man
ce
mon
itori
ng a
nd e
valu
atio
n ac
ross
gov
ernm
ent
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Obj
ecti
ve: E
ffect
ive
M&
E of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
gov
ernm
ent
polic
ies
and
plan
s
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
6: S
trat
egic
obj
ecti
ve a
nd m
ediu
m t
erm
tar
gets
for
2016
/17
– 20
18/1
9
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Tar
get
(5-y
ear
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
pe
rfo
rman
ce
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2012
-13
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
2020
-202
1
To s
uppo
rt
evid
ence
ba
sed
Plan
ning
, M
onito
ring
and
Ev
alua
tion
(PM
&E)
Prov
ide
rese
arch
and
ev
alua
tion
serv
ices
--
-8
eval
uatio
ns a
nd
two
rese
arch
pr
ojec
ts c
ompl
eted
Con
duct
res
earc
h an
d ev
alua
tion
to
supp
ort
evid
ence
ba
sed
PM&
E
Con
duct
re
sear
ch a
nd
eval
uatio
n to
sup
port
ev
iden
ce b
ased
PM
&E
Con
duct
re
sear
ch a
nd
eval
uatio
n to
sup
port
ev
iden
ce
base
d PM
&E
Con
duct
re
sear
ch a
nd
eval
uatio
n to
sup
port
ev
iden
ce
base
d PM
&E
Dev
elop
fram
ewor
ks
for
eval
uatio
n,
rese
arch
, kno
wle
dge
man
agem
ent
and
data
har
vest
ing,
stor
age,
ret
riev
al a
nd
anal
ysis
--
-D
evel
op a
con
cept
do
cum
ent
and
proj
ect
plan
for
data
Cen
tre
esta
blish
men
t
Inte
grat
ed
know
ledg
e an
d da
ta s
yste
ms
fram
ewor
k de
velo
ped
Inte
grat
ed
know
ledg
e an
d da
ta s
yste
ms
fram
ewor
k de
velo
ped
Inte
grat
ed
know
ledg
e an
d da
ta
syst
ems
fram
ewor
k de
velo
ped
Inte
grat
ed
know
ledg
e an
d da
ta
syst
ems
fram
ewor
k de
velo
ped
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
63
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Pe
rfo
rman
ce/
Tar
gets
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive:
To
supp
ort
evid
ence
bas
ed P
lann
ing,
Mon
itori
ng a
nd E
valu
atio
n (P
M&
E)
1.
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y ca
bine
t
Ann
ual p
lan
for
2013
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et
Thre
e ye
ar
plan
for
2013
-16
app
rove
d by
Cab
inet
2014
/15
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y D
ecem
ber
2013
2015
/16
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
app
rove
d by
Cab
inet
in
Dec
embe
r 20
14
2016
/17
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y M
arch
20
16
2017
-18
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y M
arch
20
18
Nat
iona
l Eva
luat
ion
Plan
app
rove
d by
C
abin
et b
y M
arch
of
the
prio
r fin
anci
al y
ear
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y M
arch
of t
he
prio
r fin
anci
al
year
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y M
arch
of t
he
prio
r fin
anci
al
year
2.
Num
ber
of
NEP
eva
luat
ion
repo
rts
appr
oved
by
eva
luat
ion
stee
ring
co
mm
ittee
s
17
88
88
88
3.
Num
ber
of
impr
ovem
ent
plan
s pr
oduc
ed
from
NEP
ev
alua
tions
New
64
88
88
8
4.
Num
ber
of
prov
ince
s w
ith
Prov
inci
al
Eval
uatio
n Pl
ans
cove
ring
the
yea
r
New
2 Pr
ovin
ces
have
Ev
alua
tion
Plan
s by
Mar
ch 2
014
5 Pr
ovin
ces
have
Eva
luat
ion
Plan
s by
Mar
ch
2015
(3 n
ew
prov
ince
s)
6 Pr
ovin
cial
Ev
alua
tion
Plan
s co
veri
ng 2
016/
17
appr
oved
by
Dire
ctor
Gen
eral
O
tP o
r EX
CO
by
Mar
ch 2
016
7 Pr
ovin
cial
ev
alua
tion
plan
s co
veri
ng 2
017/
18
7 Pr
ovin
ces
have
Ev
alua
tion
Plan
s co
veri
ng t
he y
ear
in
ques
tion
7 Pr
ovin
ces
have
Eva
luat
ion
Plan
s co
veri
ng
the
year
in
ques
tion
7 Pr
ovin
ces
have
Eva
luat
ion
Plan
s co
veri
ng
the
year
in
ques
tion
5.
Num
ber
of
depa
rtm
ents
with
D
epar
tmen
tal
Eval
uatio
n Pl
ans
cove
ring
the
yea
r
--
--
30 v
erifi
ed D
EPs
as p
er M
PAT
re
sults
30 v
erifi
ed D
EPs
as
per
MPA
T r
esul
ts35
ver
ified
D
EPs
as p
er
MPA
T r
esul
ts
40 v
erifi
ed
DEP
s as
per
M
PAT
res
ults
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
64
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Pe
rfo
rman
ce/
Tar
gets
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
6.
Num
ber
of
stra
tegi
c re
sear
ch
and
synt
hesi
s as
sign
men
ts
com
plet
ed b
y th
e en
d of
the
fin
anci
al y
ear
Gov
erna
nce
stru
ctur
es p
ut
in p
lace
and
22
res
earc
h pa
pers
wer
e re
ceiv
ed b
y th
e en
d of
the
fin
anci
al y
ear
21 r
esea
rch
pape
rs fi
nalis
ed2
2 re
sear
ch
assig
nmen
ts
com
plet
ed
2 R
esea
rch
assi
gnm
ents
and
3
NID
S br
iefs
co
mpl
eted
by
Mar
ch 2
018
3 as
sign
men
ts p
lus
3x N
IDS
rese
arch
pa
pers
5 pl
us 3
x
NID
S re
sear
ch
pape
rs
2 as
sign
men
ts
plus
3x
NID
S re
sear
ch
pape
rs)
7.
DPM
E kn
owle
dge
shar
ing
plat
form
s im
plem
ente
d an
d kn
owle
dge
prod
ucts
di
ssem
inat
ed
--
--
4 D
PME
know
ledg
e sh
arin
g pl
atfo
rms
impl
emen
ted
and
13 k
now
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts
diss
emin
ated
4 th
emat
ic e
vent
s co
nduc
ted;
13 k
now
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts d
evel
oped
an
d di
ssem
inat
ed
4 th
emat
ic
even
ts
cond
ucte
d;
13 k
now
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts
deve
lope
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed
4 th
emat
ic
even
ts
cond
ucte
d;
13 k
now
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts (
e.g.
polic
y br
iefs
or
rep
orts
) de
velo
ped
and
diss
emin
ated
8.
Num
ber
of
Out
com
es
repo
rts
disp
laye
d to
the
pub
lic o
n PO
A s
yste
m
48 q
uart
erly
re
port
s pr
oduc
ed a
nd
subm
itted
4 pe
r ou
tcom
ePr
oduc
e an
d pu
blish
3
repo
rts
for
each
out
com
e (e
xclu
ding
ou
tcom
es
for
whi
ch t
he
repo
rts
are
clas
sified
)
and
have
the
m
disp
layed
to
the
publ
ic o
n th
e w
ebsit
e
3 re
port
s fo
r ea
ch
outc
ome
on t
he
POA
syst
em (e
xclu
ding
ou
tcom
es fo
r w
hich
th
e re
port
s ar
e cl
assifi
ed) b
y 31
M
arch
201
6
3 R
epor
ts fo
r ea
ch o
utco
me
on t
he P
OA
sy
stem
(ex
clud
ing
outc
omes
for
whi
ch t
he r
epor
ts
are
clas
sifie
d) b
y 31
Mar
ch 2
018
3 re
port
s fo
r ea
ch o
utco
me
on
the
POA
sys
tem
(e
xclu
ding
out
com
es
for
whi
ch t
he r
epor
ts
are
clas
sifie
d) b
y 31
M
arch
201
9
3 re
port
s fo
r ea
ch o
utco
me
on t
he P
OA
sy
stem
(e
xclu
ding
ou
tcom
es
for
whi
ch t
he
repo
rts
are
clas
sifie
d) b
y 31
Mar
ch 2
020
3 re
port
s fo
r ea
ch o
utco
me
on t
he P
OA
sy
stem
(e
xclu
ding
ou
tcom
es
for
whi
ch t
he
repo
rts
are
clas
sifie
d) b
y 31
Mar
ch 2
021
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
65
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
2016
-201
7
Pla
nned
Pe
rfo
rman
ce/
Tar
gets
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
9.
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pu
blic
atio
n
N/A
Publ
ished
Ann
ual
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
Com
plet
e A
nnua
l D
evel
opm
ent
Indi
cato
rs
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
by
31 O
ctob
er
2014
and
pu
blish
ed o
n D
PME
web
site
with
in 3
0 da
ys o
f C
abin
et a
ppro
val
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pro
duce
d an
d po
sted
on
DPM
E w
ebsit
e by
31 M
arch
201
6
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pr
oduc
ed a
nd
post
ed o
n D
PME
web
site
by
31
Mar
ch 2
018
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pro
duce
d an
d po
sted
on
DPM
E w
ebsi
te b
y 31
Mar
ch
2019
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pr
oduc
ed a
nd
post
ed o
n D
PME
web
site
by
31
Mar
ch
2020
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pr
oduc
ed a
nd
post
ed o
n D
PME
web
site
by
31
Mar
ch
2021
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
66
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gra
mm
e P
erfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r Q
uar
terl
y T
arge
ts (2
017/
18)
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
r/s
Tar
get
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr
-Jun
e)2n
d (J
uly-
Sept
)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
1.
Nat
iona
l Eva
luat
ion
Plan
app
rove
d by
ca
bine
t
2017
-18
Nat
iona
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et
by M
arch
201
8
Ann
ual
Nat
iona
l Eva
luat
ion
Plan
Cab
inet
min
utes
--
-N
atio
nal E
valu
atio
n Pl
an a
ppro
ved
by C
abin
et b
y M
arch
of t
he p
rior
fin
anci
al y
ear
2.
Num
ber
of N
EP
eval
uatio
n re
port
s ap
prov
ed b
y ev
alua
tion
stee
ring
com
mitt
ees
8A
nnua
lR
epor
ts
Min
utes
of S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ees
--
-8
3.
Num
ber
of
impr
ovem
ent
plan
s pr
oduc
ed fr
om N
EP
eval
uatio
ns
8A
nnua
lIm
prov
emen
t pl
ans
--
-8
4.
Num
ber
of p
rovi
nces
w
ith P
rovi
ncia
l Ev
alua
tion
Plan
s co
veri
ng t
he y
ear
7 Pr
ovin
cial
ev
alua
tion
plan
s co
veri
ng 2
017/
18
Ann
ual
PEPs
--
-7
5.
Num
ber
of
depa
rtm
ents
with
D
epar
tmen
tal
Eval
uatio
n Pl
ans
cove
ring
the
yea
r
30 v
erifi
ed D
EPs
as
per
MPA
T r
esul
tsA
nnua
lD
EPs
--
-30
6.
Num
ber
of s
trat
egic
re
sear
ch a
nd s
ynth
esis
as
sign
men
ts c
ompl
eted
by
the
end
of t
he
finan
cial
yea
r
2 R
esea
rch
assi
gnm
ents
and
3
NID
S br
iefs
co
mpl
eted
by
Mar
ch
2018
Ann
ual
Fina
lized
res
earc
h re
port
s-
--
2 as
sign
men
ts p
lus
3x N
IDS
rese
arch
pa
pers
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
67
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
r/s
Tar
get
2017
-201
8R
epo
rtin
g Pe
rio
dM
eans
of
veri
ficat
ion
1st
(Apr
-Jun
e)2n
d (J
uly-
Sept
)3r
d (O
ct-D
ec)
4th
(Jan
-Mar
ch)
7.
DPM
E kn
owle
dge
shar
ing
plat
form
s im
plem
ente
d an
d kn
owle
dge
prod
ucts
di
ssem
inat
ed
4 D
PME
know
ledg
e sh
arin
g pl
atfo
rms
impl
emen
ted
and
13
know
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts
diss
emin
ated
Ann
ual
Upd
ated
res
earc
h re
posi
tory
(s)
incl
udin
g w
ide
rang
e of
DPM
E ev
iden
ce
gene
rate
d-
2 T
hem
atic
kn
owle
dge
even
ts
cond
ucte
d;
6 D
PME
know
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts
diss
emin
ated
2 th
emat
ic
know
ledg
e ev
ents
co
nduc
ted;
7 D
PME
know
ledg
e pr
oduc
t di
ssem
inat
ed
8.
Num
ber
of O
utco
mes
re
port
s di
spla
yed
to
the
publ
ic o
n PO
A
syst
em
3 R
epor
ts fo
r ea
ch
outc
ome
on t
he P
OA
sy
stem
(ex
clud
ing
outc
omes
for
whi
ch
the
repo
rts
are
clas
sifie
d) b
y 31
M
arch
201
8
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
from
PO
A
IT s
yste
mO
ne r
epor
t fo
r ea
ch o
utco
me
ex
clud
ing
outc
omes
for
whi
ch t
he r
epor
ts
are
clas
sifie
d
One
rep
ort
for
each
out
com
e
excl
udin
g ou
tcom
es fo
r w
hich
the
rep
orts
ar
e cl
assi
fied
-O
ne r
epor
t fo
r ea
ch o
utco
me
ex
clud
ing
outc
omes
for
whi
ch t
he r
epor
ts
are
clas
sifie
d
9.
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pub
licat
ion
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pro
duce
d an
d po
sted
on
DPM
E w
ebsi
te b
y 31
Mar
ch
2018
Ann
ually
Dev
elop
men
t in
dica
tors
Pu
blic
atio
n
Dev
elop
men
t In
dica
tors
pr
oduc
ed a
nd
post
ed o
n D
PME
web
site
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
68
11.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
EVID
ENC
E A
ND
KN
OW
LED
GE
SYST
EMS
AU
DIT
ED O
UT
CO
ME
AEN
ER
EVIS
ED
EST
IMA
TE
MED
IUM
TER
M E
XPE
ND
ITU
RE
FRA
MEW
OR
K
Ran
d th
ousa
nd20
13/1
420
14/1
520
15/1
620
16/1
720
16/1
720
17/1
820
18/1
920
19/2
0
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent:
Evid
ence
and
Kno
wle
dge
Syst
ems
-
-
-
-
-
1,1
47
2,6
61
2,7
78
Eval
uatio
n, R
esea
rch,
Kno
wle
dge
and
Dat
a Sy
stem
s 3
1,29
7 2
8,88
3 3
0,74
3 3
3,84
1 3
3,84
1 1
08,2
74
58,
490
57,
781
Tota
l 3
1,29
7 2
8,88
3 3
0,74
3 3
3,84
1 3
3,84
1 1
09,4
21
61,
151
60,
559
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
on
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts 3
0,18
2 2
8,72
0 3
0,67
2 3
3,53
0 3
3,53
0 1
09,0
84
60,
814
60,
222
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
12,
067
14,
503
15,
605
18,
991
18,
991
28,
322
35,
030
37,
150
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
18,
115
14,
217
15,
067
14,
539
14,
539
80,
762
25,
784
23,
072
Tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
1
4 1
9 1
4 1
4 -
-
-
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 1
,115
1
49
52
297
2
97
337
3
37
337
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 3
1,29
7 2
8,88
3 3
0,74
3 3
3,84
1 3
3,84
1 1
09,4
21
61,
151
60,
559
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
69
12) Programme 7: National Youth Development
12.1 Purpose of the programme
The purpose of the programme is to oversee youth development policy and its implementation and transfer funds to the National Youth Development Agency.
The programme is made up of the following three sub-programmes:
Management: National Youth Development
Purpose: Provide management and support services to the programme
Youth Development Programmes
Purpose: Facilitate the development and implementation of national youth strategies and policies
National Youth Development Agency
Purpose: Oversee and transfer funds to the National Youth Development Agency.
12.2 Key Challenges
The Department has a responsibility to oversee Youth Development in the Country. To this end, government has developed the NYDA Act which led to the establishment of the NYDA. The role of the NYDA is to implement youth development programmes that are not implemented by mainstream departments. The Department is in the process of amending the NYDA legislation in order to improve its responsiveness to the youth’s needs. This already entails the transfer of the policy making function to DPME to enhance influence across government. The key challenge facing the programme is lack of capacity to carry out the functions.
12.3 Key Strategic interventions to improve performance
The focus of the department in the financial year 2017-18 will be on:
§ Implement and review the National Youth Policy
§ Develop supplementary documents i.e. legislation, plans, policies, strategies and frameworks for the NYP 2020
§ Monitor progress on implementation of the NYP and supplementary legislation, policies and strategies and frameworks
§ Develop M&E framework of National Youth Policy and provide support across government
§ Provide oversight on the NYDA and institutions responsible for the implementation of youth development initiatives.
§ Manage, coordinate, and engage stakeholders nationally and internationally
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
70
12.4
Pro
gram
me
7
Pur
pose
of
the
Pro
gram
me:
To
over
see
yout
h de
velo
pmen
t po
licy
and
its im
plem
enta
tion.
Tra
nsfe
r fu
nds
to t
he N
atio
nal Y
outh
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy.
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Obj
ecti
ve: E
ffect
ive
M&
E of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
gov
ernm
ent
polic
ies
and
plan
s
Tab
le 1
: Pro
gram
me
7: S
trat
egic
obj
ecti
ve a
nd m
ediu
m t
erm
tar
gets
for
2016
/17
– 20
18/1
9
Stra
tegi
c O
bjec
tive
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Tar
get
(5-y
ear
targ
et)
Aud
ited
/Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceE
stim
ated
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
2015
-201
6
Est
imat
ed
Perf
orm
ance
2016
-201
7
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2012
-201
320
13-2
014
2014
-201
520
17-2
018
2018
-201
920
19-2
020
To c
oord
inat
e an
d su
ppor
t im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he N
atio
nal
Yout
h Po
licy
acro
ss
gove
rnm
ent
Yout
h po
licy
impl
emen
ted,
m
onito
red
and
revi
ewed
New
N
ew
Nat
iona
l Yo
uth
Polic
y ap
prov
ed
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
an
d re
view
of t
he
Yout
h po
licy
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Yout
h po
licy
Impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
id-t
erm
re
view
of t
he
Yout
h po
licy
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Yout
h po
licy
Revi
ew o
f the
Yo
uth
polic
y
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
71
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
rs a
nd A
nnua
l Tar
gets
(201
7/18
) and
MT
EF T
arge
ts
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
s
Aud
ited
/ Act
ual P
erfo
rman
ceEs
tim
ated
Pe
rfor
man
ce
2016
-201
7
Plan
ned
Perf
orm
ance
/ Ta
rget
s
2017
-201
8
Med
ium
ter
m t
arge
ts
2013
-201
420
14-2
015
2015
-201
620
18-2
019
2019
-202
020
20-2
021
1.
Rev
ised
Nat
iona
l Yo
uth
Polic
y an
d im
plem
enta
tion
repo
rts
Non
eN
one
Non
eM
onito
r im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y
Mon
itor
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e N
atio
nal Y
outh
Po
licy
and
prod
uce
impl
emen
tatio
n re
port
s
Mon
itor
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e N
atio
nal Y
outh
Po
licy
Rev
ise
the
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y
Rev
ised
Nat
iona
l Yo
uth
Polic
y su
bmitt
ed t
o C
abin
et fo
r ap
prov
al
2.
Cab
inet
app
rove
d M
&E
fram
ewor
k fo
r th
e N
atio
nal Y
outh
Po
licy
Non
eN
one
Non
eD
raft
M&
E fr
amew
ork
to m
onito
r im
plem
enta
tion
of t
he N
atio
nal
Yout
h Po
licy
subm
itted
M&
E Fr
amew
ork
for
the
Nat
iona
l Yo
uth
Polic
y ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y 31
M
arch
201
8
Non
eN
one
Rev
ised
M&
E Fr
amew
ork
and
tool
s
3.
Ove
rsig
ht r
epor
ts
on N
YD
A
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
YD
A
perf
orm
ance
re
port
s qu
ality
as
sure
d an
d tr
ansf
er o
f pa
ymen
t m
ade
NY
DA
pe
rfor
man
ce
repo
rts
qual
ity
assu
red
and
tran
sfer
of p
aym
ent
mad
e qu
arte
rly
NY
DA
pe
rfor
man
ce
repo
rts
qual
ity
assu
red
and
tran
sfer
of
paym
ent
mad
e
NY
DA
pe
rfor
man
ce
repo
rts
qual
ity
assu
red
and
tran
sfer
of
paym
ent
mad
e
NY
DA
pe
rfor
man
ce
repo
rts
qual
ity
assu
red
and
tran
sfer
of
paym
ent
mad
e
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
72
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gram
me
Perf
orm
ance
Indi
cato
r Q
uart
erly
Tar
gets
(201
7/18
)
Perf
orm
ance
In
dica
tor/
sT
arge
t
2017
-201
8
Rep
ort
ing
Peri
od
Mea
ns o
f ve
rific
atio
n1s
t (A
pr-J
une)
2nd
(Jul
y-Se
pt)
3rd
(Oct
-Dec
)4t
h (J
an-M
arch
)
1.
Rev
ised
Nat
iona
l Yo
uth
Polic
y an
d im
plem
enta
tion
repo
rts
Mon
itor
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e N
atio
nal Y
outh
Po
licy
and
prod
uce
impl
emen
tatio
n re
port
s
Qua
rter
lyIm
plem
enta
tion
repo
rt P
rodu
ce
Impl
emen
tatio
n m
onito
ring
of t
he
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y
Prod
uce
Impl
emen
tatio
n m
onito
ring
of t
he
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y
Prod
uce
Impl
emen
tatio
n m
onito
ring
of t
he
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y
Prod
uce
Impl
emen
tatio
n m
onito
ring
of t
he
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y
2.
Cab
inet
ap
prov
ed M
&E
fram
ewor
k fo
r th
e N
atio
nal
Yout
h Po
licy
M&
E Fr
amew
ork
for
the
Nat
iona
l You
th
Polic
y ap
prov
ed b
y C
abin
et b
y 31
Mar
ch
2018
Qua
rter
lyD
raft
M&
E fr
amew
ork
Con
sulta
tion
repo
rts
Refi
ne d
raft
M&
E fr
amew
ork
Dra
ft M
&E
Fram
ewor
k co
nsul
ted
M&
E fr
amew
ork
subm
itted
to
Cab
inet
for
appr
oval
M&
E to
ols
deve
lope
d
3.
Ove
rsig
ht
repo
rts
on
NY
DA
NY
DA
per
form
ance
re
port
s qu
ality
as
sure
d an
d tr
ansf
er
of p
aym
ent
mad
e qu
arte
rly
Qua
rter
lyQ
ualit
y as
sure
d A
PP, S
trat
egic
Pl
an, Q
uart
erly
Pe
rfor
man
ce
repo
rts
and
tran
sfer
pay
men
t re
port
s of
the
N
YD
A
Perf
orm
ance
re
port
s of
the
N
YD
A q
ualit
y as
sure
d an
d tr
ansf
er o
f pa
ymen
t m
ade
Perf
orm
ance
re
port
s of
the
N
YD
A q
ualit
y as
sure
d an
d tr
ansf
er o
f pa
ymen
t m
ade
Perf
orm
ance
re
port
s of
the
N
YD
A q
ualit
y as
sure
d an
d tr
ansf
er o
f pa
ymen
t m
ade
Perf
orm
ance
re
port
s of
the
N
YD
A q
ualit
y as
sure
d an
d tr
ansf
er o
f pa
ymen
t m
ade
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
73
12.5
Rec
onci
ling
perf
orm
ance
tar
gets
wit
h B
udge
t an
d M
TEF
NA
TIO
NA
L Y
OU
TH
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T
AG
ENC
Y
AU
DIT
ED O
UT
CO
ME
AEN
ER
EVIS
ED
EST
IMA
TE
MED
IUM
TER
M E
XPE
ND
ITU
RE
EST
IMA
TE
Ran
d th
ousa
nd20
13/1
420
14/1
520
15/1
620
16/1
720
16/1
720
17/1
820
18/1
920
19/2
0
Sub
prog
ram
mes
Man
agem
ent:
Nat
iona
l You
th D
evel
opm
ent
-
-
-
-
-
223
3
84
395
Yout
h D
evel
opm
ent
Prog
ram
mes
4,3
90
5,0
73
5,6
33
4,4
91
4,4
91
8,9
67
11,
389
11,
907
Nat
iona
l You
th D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y 3
92,7
10
408
,237
4
09,7
89
405
,766
4
05,7
66
432
,806
4
57,9
09
483
,552
Tota
l 3
97,1
00
413
,310
4
15,4
22
410
,257
4
10,2
57
441
,996
4
69,6
82
495
,854
Econ
omic
cla
ssifi
cati
on
Cur
rent
pay
men
ts 4
,312
5
,043
5
,595
4
,461
4
,461
9
,150
1
1,73
3 1
2,26
2
Com
pens
atio
n of
em
ploy
ees
1,7
10
1,3
51
1,5
20
1,5
93
1,5
93
5,6
39
6,9
49
7,3
55
Goo
ds a
nd s
ervi
ces
2,6
02
3,6
92
4,0
75
2,8
68
2,8
68
3,5
11
4,7
84
4,9
07
Tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
392
,710
4
08,2
37
409
,789
4
05,7
66
405
,766
4
32,8
06
457
,909
4
83,5
52
Paym
ents
for
capi
tal a
sset
s 7
4 2
9 3
8 3
0 3
0 4
0 4
0 4
0
Paym
ents
for
finan
cial
ass
ets
4
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tota
l 3
97,1
00
413
,310
4
15,4
22
410
,257
4
10,2
57
441
,996
4
69,6
82
495
,854
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
74
PART C
LINKS TO OTHER PLANS
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
76
13) Links to long term infrastructure and other capital assets
This section is not applicable to the Department
14) Conditional grants
This section is not applicable
15) Public entities
The Department has an oversight role with regard to the NYDA. The function is limited to the transfer of funds to the NYDA according to the expenditure against their plans
16) Public private partnerships
This section is not applicable
Part C: Links to Other Plans
ANNEXURE
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
78
Programme 1: Administration
Programme Objectives
Objective Title 1. To coordinate the provision of strategy and organisational development services
Objective Statement Co-ordinate the development of the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation’s (DPME) Strategic and Annual Performance Plans and co-ordinate monitoring of the implementation of plans and report progress on their implementation
Purpose/Importance To manage good practices and corporate governance as fundamentals for efficient and effective service delivery
Source/Collection of Data Planning and M&E policies and terms of reference for management structures in place
Method of Calculation Verification of the compliance of Strategic Plan, Annual Performance Plan and Annual Report with National Treasury (NT) guidelines, approval by the Executing Authority (EA) and proof of submission to Parliament by due date
Data Limitations Inability of programmes to keep and provide valid performance information by due date
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance § 2015-2020 Strategic Plan and 2016/17 APP developed according to National Treasury guidelines and submitted to Parliament by due date
§ Quarterly reports approved by Executing Authority and submitted to National Treasury within 30 days of the end of the quarterProduce AR and submit to the Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA) for audit and to National Treasury and Parliament within stipulated time frames
§ Produce AR and submit to the Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA) for audit and to National Treasury and Parliament within stipulated time frames
Objective Responsibility Head: Office of the DG
Annexure 1: Indicator Descriptors
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
79
Objective Title 2. To provide human resource management and development servicesObjective Statement Recruitment of appropriately skilled staff and maintenance of appropriate skills levels
through training and development
Purpose/Importance HR processes and programmes in place
Source/Collection of Data PERSAL reports and HR manual data bases
Method of Calculation Number of vacancies divided by number of approved posts, expressed as a percentage, showing 10% vacancy rate
Data Limitations Risk of days in filling post due to security clearance delays
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance § Maintain a vacancy rate of less than 10% annually
§ Empower and increase awareness among young people with the necessary workplace skills and experience to ensure that they are marketable to access the labour market
Objective Responsibility Director: Human Resources Management
Objective Title 3. To manage and facilitate the provision of financial and supply chain management services
Objective Statement To promote overall financial efficiency as measured by prudent financial management and compliance with prescripts and policies governing public finance by strengthening financial management practices in the areas of budgeting, expenditure monitoring and reporting
Purpose/Importance To achieve unqualified audit opinion on financial statements with findings
Source/Collection of Data Financial statements and reports on payment of suppliers
Method of Calculation Total number of invoices received and paid within 30 days divided by the total number of invoices received, expressed as a percentage
Unqualified financial statements
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance Achieve unqualified audit opinion on financial statements in the Annual Report and assess the effectiveness of internal control payment compliance and accountability
Objective Responsibility Chief Financial Officer
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
80
Objective Title 4. To manage the provision of information, communication and technology (ICT) management services
Objective Statement To provide ICT Infrastructure and business applications to support the Department to deliver on its mandate
Purpose/Importance To provide effective and efficient departmental operations
Source/Collection of Data Monthly departmental systems health report from service providers and the departmental ICT systemApproved business applications plan and reports indicating percentage of systems availability
Method of Calculation Simple count of the number of reports produced and a systems generated analysis reportReports indicating the number of activities in the business applications plan achieved
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance Annual ICT plan produced and approved by CIO by 30 June
Objective Responsibility Chief Information Officer
Objective Title 5. To provide marketing, communication and stakeholder liaison services to the Department
Objective Statement Develop a communication strategy and plan for media engagement, and stakeholder liaison and communication with the public as well as internal staff
Purpose/Importance To keep the public informed of government programmes
Source/Collection of Data Communication plan and stakeholder engagement activities in place
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the presence of the plans
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance 1 Communication plan and 4 implementation reports
Objective Responsibility Chief Director: Marketing and Communication
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
81
Objective Title 6. To manage the provision of risk, anti-corruption and integrity management services
Objective Statement Periodic risk assessment and audits on compliance with laws and regulations to identify potential risks and governance weakness
Purpose/Importance Compliance with good management and corporate governance principles
Source/Collection of Data Risk management plan, quarterly risk reports, risk registers and minutes of Risk Management Committee
Method of Calculation Verification of risk management plan, internal audit plan, updated risk register and proof of submission to Risk Management and Audit Committee
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance Conduct annual risk assessments, develop annual risk registers and monitor implementation of risks and produce quarterly monitoring reportsProduce a risk based 3-year rolling audit plan
Objective Responsibility Head: Risk and Internal Audit
Objective Title 7. To manage the provision of internal audit servicesObjective Statement Periodic internal audits on compliance with laws and regulations to identify potential
governance weakness
Purpose/Importance Compliance with good management and corporate governance principles
Source/Collection of Data 3-year strategic internal audit plan, quarterly implementation reports and annual audit plan
Method of Calculation Verification of internal audit plan and proof of submission to Audit Committee
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance Produce a risk based 3-year rolling audit plan
Objective Responsibility Head: Internal Audit
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
82
Programme Annual Indicator Descriptors
1. OfficeoftheDG
Indicator Title 1. Approved Annual Performance Plan (APP)Short Definition Ensure that all departmental plans are timely developed and reported in line with planning
frameworks
Purpose/Importance To provide strategic direction for the Department and promote accountability and good corporate governance
Source/Collection of Data Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan filed in the DPME filing system
Method of Calculation Verification of the presence of the plans
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 2015-2020 Strategic Plan reviewed (if required) and 2016/17 APP developed according to National Treasury guidelines and submitted to Parliament by due date
Indicator Responsibility Head: Planning
Indicator Title 2. Number of quarterly implementation monitoring reports against the Annual Performance Plan
Short Definition Quarterly reports showing the performance of the Department against set targets in the Annual Performance Plan
Purpose/Importance To report progress on the departmental objectives and targets
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly reports and Annual Report filed in the DPME filing system
Method of Calculation Verification of the compliance of Annual Performance Plan and reports with National Treasury guidelines, approval by the Executing Authority and proof of submission by due date
Data Limitations Inability of programmes to keep and provide valid performance information by due date
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly and Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance Quarterly reports approved by Executing Authority and submitted to National Treasury within 30 days of the end of the quarter
Indicator Responsibility Head: Planning
Indicator Title 3. Audited Annual Report (AR)
Short Definition Annual Report on departmental activities against its planned targets
Purpose/Importance To report progress on the annual departmental objectives and targets
Source/Collection of Data Audited Annual Report filed in the DPME filing system
Method of Calculation Verification of the compliance of the Annual Report with NT guidelines, approval by EA and proof of submission by due date
Data Limitations Inability of programmes to keep and provide valid performance information by due date
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Produce AR and submit to AGSA for audit and to NT and Parliament by due dates
Indicator Responsibility Head: Planning
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
83
2. HumanResource
Indicator Title 4. Percentage of vacancies against funded posts in PERSAL over a quarter (vacancy rate)
Short Definition Measurement of the average rate of vacancies in the Department
Purpose/Importance To ensure all vacant posts are filled on time
Source/Collection of Data PERSAL reports and manual data base
Method of Calculation Number of vacancies divided by number of approved posts, expressed as a percentage, showing 10% vacancy rate
Data Limitations Risk of delays in filling posts due to security clearance delays
Type of Objective Performance
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Maintain a vacancy rate of 10% or less annually
Indicator Responsibility Director: Human Resources Management
Indicator Title 5. Percentage of interns enrolled against the funded postShort Definition Measure the number of interns enrolled in the Department on an annual basis
Purpose/Importance To provide valuable practical work experience and establish an effective system with
the continuous development of unemployed and qualified youth for appointment in the
labour market
Source/Collection of Data PERSAL reports and manual data base
Method of Calculation Total number of interns divided by total workforce expressed as a percentage
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Performance
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 5% or more (of the approved funded post establishment) of interns are appointed annually in the Department
Indicator Responsibility Director: Human Resources Management
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
84
Indicator Title 6 Percentage of performance agreements and reports submitted on time
Short Definition Measure of the efficiency of performance management processes in the Department
Purpose/Importance To efficiently implement the performance management and development system
Source/Collection of Data Submission analysis report
Method of Calculation Number agreements, reviews and assessments submitted divided by total qualifying staff compliment, expressed as a percentage, showing 90% compliance
Data Limitations Risk of incorrect information being captured and absence of some staff members during submission due dates
Type of Objective Performance
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Achieve 90% submissions of performance agreements, reviews and assessments by due dates
Indicator Responsibility Director: Human Resources Management
Indicator Title 7 Percentage achievement of targets in the Workplace Skills Plan (WSP) achieved
Short Definition Measure whether the Workplace Skills Plan of the Department is being implemented
Purpose/Importance To ensure that staff are appropriately skilled and competent to deliver on the mandate of the Department
Source/Collection of Data Approved WSP and manual training database
Method of Calculation Approved WSP and number of targets achieved, divided by total number of targets in the WSP, expressed as a percentage
Data Limitations Risk of late submission resulting in late or incomplete submission
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance WSP approved by DG by 30 April 2017. Achieve 80% of targets in the WSP by the end of the financial year
Indicator Responsibility Director: Human Resources Management
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
85
Indicator Title 8 Percentage of Senior Management Services (SMS) members submitting financial disclosures
Short Definition All SMS are required to disclose their registerable interests by not later than 30 April of each year. Senior Managers who are appointed after 1 April must make disclosures within 30 days after assumption of duty in respect of the period of 12 months preceding their assumption of duty
Purpose/Importance Designated employees are entrusted with public funds. As such, they need to maintain the highest standards of professional ethics. Their integrity and that of their departments must be beyond question. This framework is aimed at preventing conflict of interests by requiring of designated employees to disclose their financial interests
Source/Collection of Data Financial disclosures e-filing system reports
Method of Calculation Number of financial disclosures submitted, divided by total number of SMS staff compliment, expressed as a percentage
Data Limitations Risk in delay in submission of financial e-disclosures as a result of e-disclosure system not being operational
Type of Objective Performance/compliance
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 100% compliance in submission of financial interests by all designated employees within the specified time frames
Indicator Responsibility Director: Human Resources Management
3. FinancialManagement
Indicator Title 9 Percentage of valid invoices paid within 30 days and cases where non-compliance lead to disciplinary action
Short Definition The indicator measures the number of invoices paid within 30 days according to the NT guidelines
Purpose/Importance To assess the level of compliance with legislation, regulations and accounting standards
Source/Collection of Data Audited annual financial statements
Method of Calculation Number of invoices paid within 30 days divided by the number of valid invoices received on a monthly basis
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 100% of valid invoices paid within 30 days or disciplinary action taken in 100% of cases where invoices are not paid within 30 days
Indicator Responsibility Chief Financial Officer
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
86
4. InformationTechnologySupport
Indicator Title 10 Approved Information Communication and Technology (ICT) Plan Short Definition ICT Plan to guide implementation and alignment of business applications to the needs of
DPME
Purpose/Importance To support efficient achievement of departmental strategic objectives
Source/Collection of Data Approved business applications plan and reports indicating percentage of systems availability
Method of Calculation Reports indicating the number of activities in the business applications plan achieved, divided by total number of targeted activities, expressed as a percentage
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Performance
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance Annual ICT Plan produced and approved by CIO by 30 June
Indicator Responsibility Head: Information Communication and Technology
Indicator Title 11 Percentage achievement of targets in ICT PlanShort Definition Measure implementation and alignment of ICT Plan to the needs of DPME
Purpose/Importance To support efficient achievement of departmental strategic objectives
Source/Collection of Data Reports indicating percentage achievements of targets in the ICT Plan
Method of Calculation Reports indicating the percentage achievement of targets in the ICT plan (number of planned activities achieved, divided by total number of targeted activities, expressed as a percentage)
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Performance
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance Produced quarterly monitoring reports against the ICT plan within 30 days of end of the quarter
Indicator Responsibility Director: Business Intelligence
5. Communications
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
87
Indicator Title 12 Approved annual Communication PlanShort Definition A communication plan to effective communicate the work of the Department and engage
with stakeholders
Purpose/Importance To ensure and enhance effective communication, raise awareness and information sharing on key matters relevant to both internal and external stakeholders
Source/Collection of Data Approved communication plan and reports on activities filed in the DPME filing system
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the presence of the plan
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative (communication plan)and cumulative (implementation reports)
Reporting Cycle Annually (communication plan) and Quarterly (implementation reports)
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Annual Communication plan produced and approved by Head of Communications by 30 June including communication on progress with NDP
Indicator Responsibility Chief Director: Marketing and Communication
Indicator Title 13 Percentage achievement of targets in the Communication PlanShort Definition Communication plan to guide the implementation of the communication strategy of the
Department
Purpose/Importance Effective communication externally to inform the public about the work of the Department, particularly the NDP, and internally within government and the Department
Source/Collection of Data Reports indicating percentage achievements of targets in the Communication Plan
Method of Calculation Reports indicating the 80% achievement of targets in the Communication Plan (number of planned activities achieved, divided by total number of targeted activities, expressed as a percentage)
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Performance
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 80% of communication activities described in the communication plan implemented by the end of the financial year
Indicator Responsibility Head: Communications
6. RiskManagement
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
88
Indicator Title 14 Approved Risk Management RegisterShort Definition Monitor the implementation of risk management plan and produce risk register to identify
accessible risks and mitigating actions
Purpose/Importance To identify and mitigate risks that might hamper achievement of departmental objectives
Source/Collection of Data Risk management plan, quarterly risk reports, risk registers and minutes of Risk Management Committee
Method of Calculation Verification of existence of quarterly reports against risk management plan, updated risk register and proof of submission to Risk Management and Audit Committee
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative (plans) and cumulative (reports)
Reporting Cycle Quarterly and Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Conduct annual risk assessments and produce annual risk plan and quarterly progress reports
Indicator Responsibility Chief Risk Officer
Indicator Title 15 Quarterly Risk Management ReportsShort Definition Monitor the implementation of risk management plan and produce risk register to identify
accessible risks and mitigating actions
Purpose/Importance To identify and mitigate risks that might hamper achievement of departmental objectives
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly risk reports and minutes of Risk Management Committee
Method of Calculation Verification of existence of quarterly reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative (plans) and cumulative (reports)
Reporting Cycle Quarterly and Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Produce quarterly progress reports against the targets in the risk plan
Indicator Responsibility Chief Risk Officer
7. InternalAudit
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
89
Indicator Title 16 Approved three-year rolling Internal Audit PlanShort Definition Plan for conducting internal audits and monitoring reports on the implementation of the
plan
Purpose/Importance To evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and provide internal audit reports to management and Audit Committee
Source/Collection of Data 3-year strategic internal audit plan and annual audit plan
Method of Calculation Verification of the presence of the internal audit plan and simple count of reports produced and proof of submission to Audit Committee
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Produce a 3-year rolling strategic internal audit plan and submit to the Audit Committee for approval by 30 June 2017
Indicator Responsibility Chief Audit Executive
Indicator Title 17 Quarterly Internal Audit (IA)ReportShort Definition Monitoring reports on the implementation of the internal audit plan
Purpose/Importance To evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and provide internal audit reports to management and Audit Committee
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly implementation monitoring reports of the annual audit plan
Method of Calculation Simple count of reports produced and proof of submission to Audit Committee
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Quarterly audit implementation reports presented to Audit Committee and management produced
Indicator Responsibility Chief Audit Executive
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
90
Programme 2: National Planning Coordination
Programme Objectives
Objective Title 1 To facilitate long-term planning, alignment of budget allocations and short term plans and develop planning frameworks
Objective Statement Strengthening and institutionalise planning through facilitation of the development and periodic updating of spatial and long, medium and short term plans of government
Purpose/Importance To inform more effective planning through research, quality of policies and plans
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly reports against the APP
Method of Calculation Verification of audited performance against the APP as reported annually
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective Yes
Desired Performance § Framework on the institutionalisation of planning finalised
§ National Special Development Framework developed
§ Water sector plan finalised by Dec 2017
Objective Responsibility Head: National Planning Coordination
Objective Title 2 To ensure that national budget process is informed by priorities identified annually for government plans
Objective Statement Participation in the budget review process to ensure that national budget supports implementation of identified priorities of government
Purpose/Importance To ensure that government priorities as determined by the NDP and MTSF are adequately budget for
Source/Collection of Data Budget mandate paper
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the presence of budget mandate paper
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Objective New
Desired Performance Annual budget mandate paper produced by April 2017
Objective Responsibility Head: National Planning Coordination
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
91
Objective Title 3 Results based planning institutionalised in the national and provin-cial spheres of government
Objective Statement Results based planning institutionalised in the national and provincial sphere of government through the revision and roll out of the framework for medium term planning and ensuring alignment of medium term plans to government outcomes.
Purpose/Importance To ensure that medium term planning in government is aligned to the MTSF and NDP priorities.
Source/Collection of Data Approved revised Framework for Medium Term Planning
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance Roll out of the Framework for Medium Term Planning implemented by the 2019/20 financial year
Objective Responsibility Head: National Planning Coordination
Objective Title 4 To enhance coherence in policy and planningObjective Statement Implementation of SEIAS across government
Purpose/Importance Elimination of unnecessary regulatory burdens and increased policy coherence fosters investment and economic growth
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly reports against the APP
Method of Calculation Verification of audited performance against the APP as reported annually
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually New Objective No
Desired Performance Conduct socio-economic impact assessments, new and existing legislation and regulations to ensure alignment with the NDP and mitigation of unintended consequences on an annual basis
Objective Responsibility Chief Director: Socio-Economic Assessment ( SEIAS)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
92
Programme Annual Indicator Descriptors
Indicator Title 1 Cabinet approved framework for long term planning in government and long term sector plans
Short Definition Review of the role and effectiveness of the South African Government planning system to inform the institutionalisation of long term planning through engagement with government stakeholders (national, provincial and municipal government) to consult on a draft document on approaches to institutionalisation of long term planning within government, through provincial and other workshops and requests for written inputs.
Purpose/Importance To inform approaches to more effective long term planning and develop frameworks for long term plans in identified sectors such as water and energy sectors
Source/Collection of Data Cabinet approved long term planning framework and water sector plan
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of Cabinet approval
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes (revised)
Desired Performance Cabinet approved framework for long term planning in government produced by 31 March 2018 and water sector plan produced by December 2017
Indicator Responsibility Head: Planning Branch
Indicator Title 2 Annual budget priorities paper developed by April annuallyShort Definition DPME will work with the National Planning Commission, National Treasury and National
Departments responsible for key priorities (education, health, job creation/economy, fraud and corruptions). The intention is to ensure that government priorities for each financial year are adequately budgeted for
Purpose/Importance To ensure that government priorities as determined by the NDP and MTSF are adequately budget for
Source/Collection of Data Budget priority paper
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of Cabinet approval
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Indicator No (revised)
Desired Performance Annual budget priorities paper developed by April 2017 and submitted to Cabinet for approval
Indicator Responsibility Programme Manager: Research and Policy, Planning Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
93
Indicator Title 3 Annual Report detailing the activities of the NPC and stakeholder engagement on the NDP
Short Definition Recording the activities of the NPC
Purpose/Importance To record the work of the NPC in supporting the implementation of the NDP through technical assistance as well as mobilising stakeholders to implement the NDP in their own sectors
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly activity reports on technical work and public engagements
Method of Calculation Verification of the availability of the quarterly activity and Annual Report of the NPC
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly (activity report) and Annually (AR)
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Quarterly (activity report) and Annually(AR) produced
Indicator Responsibility Head: Planning Branch
Indicator Title 4 Number of assessment reports on the second draft Annual Performance Plan provided to national departments by 31 January 2018
Short Definition A report that provides information on the assessment of the second draft national APP. The assessment is based on technical compliance with the framework for Strategic and Annual Performance Plans and alignment to the MTSF
Purpose/Importance To improve medium term planning within national departments and ensure that credible Strategic and Annual Performance Plans are developed in order to accelerate service delivery
Source/Collection of Data § Assessment reports
§ Signed letters by DG and e-mail sent to national departments
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations Non-submission of Annual Performance Plans by national departments
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 40 assessment reports by 31 January 2018
Indicator Responsibility Director: National Departments (GPI)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
94
Indicator Title 5 Number of assessment reports on the second draft Annual Performance Plan provided to Offices of the Premier by 31 January 2018
Short Definition A report that provides information on the assessment of the provincial second draft revised Strategic and Annual Performance Plans. The assessment is based on the technical compliance with the framework for Strategic and Annual Performance Plans and alignment to the MTSF
Purpose/Importance To improve medium term planning within provincial departments and ensure that credible Strategic and Annual Performance Plans are developed in order to accelerate service delivery
Source/Collection of Data § Assessment reports
§ Signed letters by DG and email sent to Offices of the Premier
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations Non-submission of Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans by Offices of the Premier
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 7 assessment reports by 31 January 2018
Indicator Responsibility Director: Provincial Departments (GPI)
Indicator Title 6 Quarterly Performance Reporting Guideline issued to all national departments by 15 May 2017
Short Definition QPR Guidelines outlining reporting dates, roles and responsibilities and quarterly reporting processes for national departments
Purpose/Importance To improve compliance, accountability and institutionalise reporting against the Annual Per-formance Plans within national departments
Source/Collection of Data Email with attached PQR Guideline sent to national departments
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 7 assessment reports by 31 January 2018
Indicator Responsibility Director: National Departments (GPI)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
95
Indicator Title 7 Quarterly Performance Reporting Guideline issued to all Offices of the Premier by 15 May 2017
Short Definition QPR Guidelines outlining reporting dates, roles and responsibilities and quarterly reporting processes for provincial departments
Purpose/Importance To improve compliance, accountability and institutionalise reporting against the Annual Per-formance Plans within provincial department
Source/Collection of Data Email with attached QPR Guidelines sent to all Offices of the Premier
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 1 Guideline issued by 15 May 2017
Indicator Responsibility Director: Provincial Departments (GPI)
Indicator Title 8 Report on Socio-Economic Impact Assessments (SEIA) completed for new or amendments to existing policies, legislation and regulation
Short Definition SEAIS conducted on policy, regulation and legislation
Purpose/Importance To ensure impact assessments are conducted for policies, regulations and legislation
Source/Collection of Data Impact assessment report and Annual Report
Method of Calculation Verification of presence of Annual Report showing the total number of requests attended, divided by requests submitted, expressed as a percentage
Data Limitations Risk of quality of reports
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Annual Report showing support for 80% of requested impact assessments by end of financial year
Indicator Responsibility Chief Directorate: Socio Economic Impact Assessment Unit
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
96
PROGRAMME 3
Objective Indicators
Objective Title 1 To pursue the development and advancement agenda of government through outcomes monitoring and reporting
Objective Statement Government has adopted the NDP as its long term plan to fight poverty, reduce unemployment and inequality. The Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) has been adopted as a five-year implementation plan to pursue the developmental agenda of government as set out in the NDP. The object is to assess progress towards the attainment of the NDP goals through monitoring
Purpose/Importance Assess progress government makes against its long, medium term and short term plans
Source/Collection of Data MTSF monitoring reports
Method of Calculation Simple count of the number of reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Every 4 months
Desired Performance Produce quarterly, annually and midterm reviews of government performance against NDP/MTSF
Objective Responsibility Head: Sector Planning and Monitoring
Objective Title 2 To support initiatives undertaken to unblock problems and accelerate implementation in key sectors of the economy and service delivery
Objective Statement Support the development and implementation of detailed 3-feet plans in key priority areas
Purpose/Importance Unblock identified blockages to support implementation and implement intervention strategies and plans in key priority areas
Source/Collection of Data Operation Phakisa website
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
Desired Performance Facilitate initiatives and interventions aimed at unblocking problems, and service delivery and catalyse improvements in identified areas
Objective Responsibility Head: Sector Planning and Monitoring
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
97
Annual Performance Indicators
Indicator Title 1 Midterm Review of government performance (2014-2016) completed
Short Definition Revision of MTSF and or Delivery Agreements is required to take the prevailing circumstances into account when implementing priority outcomes
Purpose/Importance To review the MTSF and/or related Delivery Agreements to ensure that emerging factors are taken into account during implementation of the 14 outcomes in the MTSF
Source/Collection of Data Mid-term review report of all outcomes.
Method of Calculation Verification of the report
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Produce midterm review by July 2017
Indicator Responsibility DDG: Outcomes Monitoring and Evaluation Branch
Indicator Title 2 MTSF 2014-2019 Chapters reviewed Short Definition Revision of MTSF and or Delivery Agreements is required to take the prevailing
circumstances into account when implementing the 14 priority outcomes
Purpose/Importance To review the MTSF and/or related Delivery Agreements to ensure that emerging factors are taken into account during implementation of the 14 outcomes in the MTSF
Source/Collection of Data Revised MTSF and/or Delivery Agreements documents
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the MTSF chapters and/or Delivery Agreements revised by comparing the previous version with the revised version to identify revised areas
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance MTSF 2014-2019 Chapters reviewed by December 2017 to incorporate findings from the midterm review (excluding Outcomes 9 and 12)
Indicator Responsibility DDG: Outcomes Monitoring and Evaluation Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
98
Indicator Title 3 Number of Quarterly Reports submitted to Cabinet on the priority outcomes
Short Definition Monitoring reports measure progress against targets set in each outcome and are used to inform the relevant Cabinet committees to enable them to take appropriate actions
Purpose/Importance To inform Cabinet on progress with the implementation of the 14 outcomes
Source/Collection of Data 14 monitoring reports (1 for each outcome) and proof of submission to Cabinet
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the presence of the report and proof of submission to Cabinet
Data Limitations Risk of departments providing wrong data
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Three times a year
New Indicator No
Desired Performance MTSF Progress Reports on all (excluding Outcomes 9 and 12) outcomes submitted to Cabinet in June, September and November 2017
Indicator Responsibility DDG: Outcomes Monitoring and Evaluation Branch
Indicator Title 4 Number of Operation Phakisa Progress Reports producedShort Definition Support the development and implementation of detailed 3-feet plans in key priority areas
Purpose/Importance To provide regular feedback to the all stakeholders as well as the general public on the implementation progress on Lab initiatives
Source/Collection of Data Reporting dashboards on the Operation Phakisa website
Method of Calculation Simple count of the number of dashboard reports per Lab
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance One comprehensive Operation Phakisa Progress Report produced quarterly, encompassing progress with all 6 delivery Labs
Indicator Responsibility DDG: Outcomes Monitoring and Evaluation Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
99
Programme 4: Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity
Programme Objectives
ProgrammeObjectives
Objective Title To facilitate the implementation of Outcomes 9 and 12. Support implementation of the MTSF by monitoring and improving the capacity of state institutions to develop and implement plans and provide services
Objective Statement Government has adopted the NDP as its long term plan to fight poverty, reduce unemployment and inequality. The Medium Term Strategic Framework has been adopted as a five-year implementation plan to pursue the developmental agenda of government as set out in the NDP. The object is to assess progress towards the attainment of the NDP goals through monitoring
Purpose/Importance To support and strengthen the capacity to deliver on its mandates
Source/Collection of Data Monitoring reports
Method of Calculation Simple count of the number of reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Every 4 months
New Objective No-revised
Desired Performance § Midterm and end of term reviews of government performance related to Outcomes 9 and 12 completed
§ MTSF 2014-2019 Chapters reviewed
§ Monitoring reports on Outcomes 9 and 12
Objective Responsibility Head: Public Sector Monitoring and Evaluation
Objective Title To support initiatives undertaken to unblock problems and accelerate implementation of good management practices
Objective Statement Facilitate assessment and provide support to build technical and workplace capabilities to deliver on government priorities
Purpose/Importance To support long, medium and short term sector planning functions and monitor, facilitate, support implementation and implement intervention strategies and plans in key priority areas
Source/Collection of Data Data from assessment tools and reports of assessments
Method of Calculation Simple count and data drawn from analysis of reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Simple count
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No-revised
Desired Performance Develop and use appropriate tools to monitor state of compliance with management practices annually in the three spheres of government
Objective Responsibility Head: Public Sector Monitoring and Evaluation
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
100
Programme Indicator Descriptors
Indicator Title 1 Midterm Review of government performance related to Outcomes 9 and 12 completed
Short Definition Monitoring and reporting of government performance on Outcome 9 and 12
Purpose/Importance To evaluate government performance related to Outcomes 9 and 12 and report to the relevant structures
Source/Collection of Data Midterm review report for Outcomes 9 and 12
Method of Calculation Simple count of reports produced for Outcomes 9 and 12
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Bi-annual
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance Midterm review completed by July 2017
Indicator Responsibility DDG: Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity
Indicator Title 2 MTSF 2014-2019 Chapters for Outcomes 9 and 12 reviewedShort Definition Revision of the MTSF for 2014-2019 for Outcomes 9 and 12 compiled
Purpose/Importance To review the MTSF for Outcomes 9 and 12 to ensure that emerging factors are taken into account during implementation
Source/Collection of Data Revised MTSF and/or Delivery Agreements documents related to Outcomes 9 and 12
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the MTSF revised by comparing the previous version with the revised version to identify revised areas for Outcomes 9 and 12
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance MTSF 2014-2019 Chapters reviewed by December 2017 to incorporate findings from the midterm review
Indicator Responsibility DDG: Public Sector Monitoring and Capacity
Indicator Title 3 Number of Quarterly Reports submitted to Cabinet on Outcomes 9 and 12
Short Definition Monitoring reports that assess progress against targets set in Outcomes 9 and 12 and are used to inform the relevant Cabinet committees to enable them to take appropriate actions
Purpose/Importance To inform Cabinet on progress with the implementation of Outcomes 9 and 12
Source/Collection of Data Monitoring reports on Outcomes 9 and 12
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the presence of the report and proof of submission to Cabinet
Data Limitations Risk of departments providing wrong data
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance MTSF Progress Reports on Outcomes 9 and 12 submitted to Cabinet in June, September and November 2017
Indicator Responsibility DDG
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
101
Indicator Title 4 Percentage of departments assessment on management practicesShort Definition This is the percentage of national and provincial departments completing the annual
assessments based on MPAT standards on the MPAT web-based system
Purpose/Importance To ensure continuous self-reflection and learnings by departmental management on management practices
Source/Collection of Data MPAT web-based system
Method of Calculation Number departments completed the self-assessments (provincial and national departments)/total number of departments (provincial and national departments) * 100 (as per the Public Service Act)
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 95% MPAT assessments completed for national and provincial departments by 31 March 2018
Indicator Responsibility Head: Management Performance Monitoring and Support
Indicator Title 5 Number of Local Government Management Improvement Model (LGMIM) scorecards completed
Short Definition Number of municipalities which submitted completed LGMIM self-assessments
Purpose/Importance To assess the level of compliance by municipalities with management practices
Source/Collection of Data Excel based LGMIM self-assessment score cards
Method of Calculation Simple count of the number of completed LGMIM self-assessment score cards submitted to DPME by end of the financial year
Data Limitations Completeness of information informing the assessments as received from municipalities
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Produce 30 score cards by end of financial year
Indicator Responsibility Head: Local Government Performance Assessment: OME Branch
Indicator Title 6 Percentage of targets in the PM&E Capacity Development Plan achieved
Short Definition A comprehensive M&E capacity development strategy and implementation plan covering all areas of M&E capacity building
Purpose/Importance To create a strategic and coordinated approach to M&E capacity development
Source/Collection of Data Approved strategy and plan with specified targets stored in DPME M-drive
Method of Calculation Number of targets achieved in the PM&E Capacity Development Plan expressed as a percentage of total targets
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Achieve 80% of targets in the Capacity Development Implementation Plan
Indicator Responsibility Chief Director: M&E Policy and Capacity Building
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
102
Programme 5: Frontline Monitoring
Programme Objectives
Objective Title 1 To monitor the quality of the services provided by government to citizens at institution and facility level
Objective Statement To conduct on-site monitoring of the quality of frontline service delivery
Purpose/Importance Increased responsiveness of public servants and accountability to citizens
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly reports against the APP
Method of Calculation A count of the number of site reports for each site visited
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No
Desired Performance § Number of monitoring visits to support policy priorities
§ Number of departments implementing CBM
§ Percentage implementation of Annual Presidential Hotline Enhancement Plan
§ Total number of Siyahlola and Izimbizos conducted
Objective Responsibility Director: Frontline Service Delivery Monitoring
Programme Indicator Descriptors
Indicator Title 1 Number of monitoring visits to support policy prioritiesShort Definition A frontline monitoring visit is defined as when a DPME official conducts an on-site visit to a
government facility and/or project site
Purpose/Importance To provide on-sight evidence of the status of service delivery and to support service delivery improvement
Source/Collection of Data Reports
Method of Calculation Monitoring report logged on FSDM system
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 400 monitoring visits
Indicator Responsibility Head: Presidential Frontline Monitoring and Support
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
103
Indicator Title 2 Number of departments implementing CBMShort Definition Department is defined as a national, provincial or local government institution, either
directly delivering services or supporting other government institutions to deliver services. Supported is defined as receiving non-financial technical assistance to plan, implement and review a citizen-based monitoring intervention. Citizen-based monitoring is defined as per the Framework for Strengthening Citizen-Government Partnerships for Monitoring Frontline Service Delivery Monitoring
Purpose/Importance To support government departments to build capacity, knowledge and tools to implement citizen-based monitoring as a means to advance policy priorities
Source/Collection of Data Reports of departments supported
Method of Calculation Simple count
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output indicator
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 3
Indicator Responsibility Director: Citizen Based Monitoring BM
Indicator Title 3 Percentage of targets in the Annual Presidential Hotline Enhancement Plan implemented
Short Definition The Annual Presidential Hotline Enhancement Plan captures all activities and outputs planned for 2017/18 to support continuous improvement in the quality, speed and overall resolution rate of complaints logged with the Presidential Hotline
Purpose/Importance To enhance the Presidential Hotline system through implementing projects focused on en-hancing the inter-departmental case resolution system, the analytical and reporting capability and the communication platform
Source/Collection of Data Quarterly progress monitoring report against Annual Presidential Enhancement Plan
Method of Calculation Number of targets in the Annual Presidential Enhancement Plan expressed as a percentage
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output indicator
Calculation Type Non-cumulative (performance will be measured against quarterly targets of the plan)
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 80% achievement of targets in Annual Presidential Enhancement Plan
Indicator Responsibility Director: Presidential Hotline
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
104
Indicator Title 4 Number of Siyahlola and Izimbizo coordinated for which briefing notes/ reports are prepared
Short Definition Siyahlola and Izimbizo is a programme for political heads to visits communities and to listen and respond to their concerns regarding the quality of public services they receive
Purpose/Importance To provide information about the profiles of the areas/communities being visited by political principals in the form of briefing notes/reports prepared to inform and enable them to conduct monitoring of government services to communities
Source/Collection of Data Reports of visits and area profiles registered in the request register
Method of Calculation Simple count of the total number of reports/area profiles/briefing notes prepared of all areas visited as per request register
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Performance
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Conduct 10 visits and produce area profiles/briefing notes/reports on Siyahlola and Izimbizo quarterly
Indicator Responsibility Chief Directorate: Monitoring Executive Support
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
105
Programme 6: Evidence and Knowledge Systems
Programme Objectives
Objective Title 1 To support evidence-based Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E)
Objective Statement Conduct research and evaluation to support evidence-based PM&E
Purpose/Importance To develop frameworks for evaluation, research, knowledge management and data harvesting, storage, retrieval and analysis
Source/Collection of Data Research and evaluation reports
Method of Calculation Simple count of research and evaluation reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Objective No-revised
Desired Performance National Evaluation Plan approved by Cabinet by March of the prior financial year
8 evaluations and 8 improvement plans
Objective Responsibility Head: Evidence and Knowledge Systems
Programme Indicator Descriptors
Indicator Title 1 National Evaluation plan approved by CabinetShort Definition Approved national evaluation plan to guide the programme of evaluating priority pro-
grammes
Purpose/Importance To ensure that priority evaluations are conducted on government programmes and policies
Source/Collection of Data Approved plan and Cabinet minutes
Method of Calculation Verification of the existence of approved plan by Cabinet
Data Limitations Access to Cabinet minutes is restricted
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No (adapted from previous)
Desired Performance 2018-19 National Evaluation Plan approved by Cabinet by March 2018
Indicator Responsibility Head: Evaluation, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
106
Indicator Title 2 Number of NEP Evaluation Reports approved by Evaluation Steer-ing Committees
Short Definition Indication of number of completed NEP evaluations
Purpose/Importance Indicates how many evaluations have been completed
Source/Collection of Data National evaluation plan and approved evaluation reports
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of evaluation reports approved by the Evaluation Steering Committee
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 8 NEP evaluation reports approved by Evaluation Steering Committees
Indicator Responsibility Head: Evaluation, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Indicator Title 3 Number of Improvement Plans produced from NEP evaluationsShort Definition All evaluations should produce improvement plans after the final report is accepted
Purpose/Importance For evaluations to have impact, it must be translated into improvement plans which show how programmes or policies must be changed
Source/Collection of Data Improvement plans
Method of Calculation Simple count of improvement plans produced
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 8 Improvement plans produced from NEP evaluations
Indicator Responsibility Head: Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Indicator Title 4 Number of provinces with Provincial Evaluation Plans covering the year
Short Definition Number of provinces with current provincial evaluation plans
Purpose/Importance To ensure that priority evaluations are conducted on provincial government programmes and policies
Source/Collection of Data Provincial evaluation plan
Method of Calculation Simple count of number of current provincial evaluation plans
Data Limitations Reliance on provinces
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No (adapted from previous)
Desired Performance 7 Provincial evaluation plans covering 2017/18
Indicator Responsibility Head: Evaluation, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
107
Indicator Title 5 Number of departments with Departmental Evaluation Plans covering the year
Short Definition Number of departments with current departmental evaluation plans
Purpose/Importance To ensure that priority evaluations are conducted on government programmes and policies
Source/Collection of Data Departmental evaluation plan
Method of Calculation Simple count of number of current departmental evaluation plans
Data Limitations Reliance on departments
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No (adapted from previous)
Desired Performance 30 verified Departmental Evaluation Plans as per MPAT results
Indicator Responsibility Head: Evaluation, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Indicator Title 6 Number of strategic research and synthesis assignments completed by the end of the financial year
Short Definition Research assignments and analytical papers completed
Purpose/Importance DPME is using the results of research to inform its work
Source/Collection of Data Research and analytical reports completed
Method of Calculation Simple count of research assignments and analytical papers completed by the end of the financial year
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 2 Research assignments and 3 NIDS briefs completed by March 2018
Indicator Responsibility Head: Research and Knowledge Systems, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Indicator Title 7 DPME knowledge sharing platforms implemented and knowledge products disseminated
Short Definition Sharing platforms run and knowledge products disseminated
Purpose/Importance DPME is sharing its evidence in dynamic ways to influence policy and practice
Source/Collection of Data Events and knowledge products produced by different branches
Method of Calculation Simple count of events run and knowledge products produced
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance 4 DPME knowledge sharing platforms implemented and 13 knowledge products disseminated
Indicator Responsibility Head: Research and Knowledge Systems, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
108
Indicator Title 8 Number of Outcomes reports displayed to the public on POA system
Short Definition Quarterly progress reports on implementation of outcomes displayed to the public (excluding outcomes whose reports are classified)
Purpose/Importance To inform the public on progress made on implementation of government priority outcomes
Source/Collection of Data DPME website and data war-room
Method of Calculation Simple count and verification of the presence of reports in DPME website and data sourced from the war-room
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance 3 Reports for each outcome on the POA system (excluding outcomes for which the reports are classified) by 31 March 2018
Indicator Responsibility Head: Data, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Indicator Title 9 Development Indicators publicationShort Definition Report on selected indicators related to economic and social development in South Africa to
inform the public about the countries progress in meeting the developmental objectives
Purpose/Importance To communicate the country’s progress towards meeting developmental goals
Source/Collection of Data Annual Development Indicators publication booklet and departmental website
Method of Calculation Verification of the presence of Annual Development Indicators publication booklet and posting on the departmental website
Data Limitations None
Type of Indicator Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annual
New Indicator No
Desired Performance Development Indicators produced and posted on DPME website by 31 March 2018
Indicator Responsibility Head: Data, Evidence and Knowledge Systems Branch
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
109
Programme 7
Objective Indicators
Objective Title 1 To coordinate and support implementation of the National Youth Policy across government
Objective Statement Government has an approved National Youth Policy which was adopted by Cabinet. The youth policy is aligned to the NDP, World Programme of Action for the Youth, and the African Youth Charter. It is aimed at guiding stakeholders within and outside of government on how to develop and empower the youth
Purpose/Importance The purpose is to coordinate, support and monitor implementation of prioritised youth development interventions in order to ensure responsiveness to the youth’s needs
Source/Collection of Data Reports
Method of Calculation Simple count of the number of reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Every 4 months
New Objective No
Desired Performance Produce quarterly monitoring reports
Objective Responsibility Head: Youth Development Programme
Annual Performance Indicators
Indicator Title 1 Revised National Youth Policy and implementation reportsShort Definition Midterm Review of the National Youth Policy will be conducted to assess progress on the
status of implementation
Purpose/Importance To review the NYP in order and to make recommendations on areas that require attention when the youth policy continue to be implemented, learn from areas of success, pinpoint priority areas for investment, and track progress over time
Source/Collection of Data M&E tools and Midterm Review report
Method of Calculation Simple assessment of progress made in implementing the National Youth Policy
Data Limitations Wrong data submitted/not submitted by stakeholders
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Annually
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance Monitor implementation of the National Youth Policy and produce implementation reports
Indicator Responsibility Head: Youth Development Programme
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
110
Indicator Title 2 Cabinet approved M&E framework for the National Youth PolicyShort Definition M&E Framework is being developed to guide the stakeholders on the key high level indi-
cators that will be monitored. This will ensure uniformity in reporting, make stakeholders account on the status of progress, and inform Cabinet on areas that require attention
Purpose/Importance To develop M&E Framework to help monitor and evaluate implementation of high impact prioritised interventions across the five key policy imperatives or domains of the National Youth Policy
Source/Collection of Data Cabinet approved M&E Framework
Method of Calculation Verification of the exigence of the M&E Framework
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Non-cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator Yes
Desired Performance M&E Framework for the National Youth Policy approved by Cabinet by 31 March 2018
Indicator Responsibility Head: Youth Development Programme
Indicator Title 3 Oversight reports on NYDAShort Definition As the parent department, the DPME is responsible for overseeing the performance of the
NYDA and transferring funds on quarterly basis
Purpose/Importance To assess and quality assure the performance reports of the NYDA
Source/Collection of Data Annual Performance Plan, Strategic Plan, quarterly reports, annual performance reports, cash flow projections, management accounts
Method of Calculation Simple assessment of reports
Data Limitations None
Type of Objective Output
Calculation Type Cumulative
Reporting Cycle Quarterly
New Indicator No
Desired Performance NYDA performance reports quality assured and transfer of payment made quarterly
Indicator Responsibility Head: Youth Development Programme
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
111
NOTES
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation | AnnuAl PerformAnce PlAn | 2017/18
112
NOTES